Standard-Model Extension

Last updated

Standard-Model Extension (SME) is an effective field theory that contains the Standard Model, general relativity, and all possible operators that break Lorentz symmetry. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Violations of this fundamental symmetry can be studied within this general framework. CPT violation implies the breaking of Lorentz symmetry, [9] and the SME includes operators that both break and preserve CPT symmetry. [10] [11] [12]

Contents

Development

In 1989, Alan Kostelecký and Stuart Samuel proved that interactions in string theories could lead to the spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry. [13] Later studies have indicated that loop-quantum gravity, non-commutative field theories, brane-world scenarios, and random dynamics models also involve the breakdown of Lorentz invariance. [14] Interest in Lorentz violation has grown rapidly in the last decades because it can arise in these and other candidate theories for quantum gravity. In the early 1990s, it was shown in the context of bosonic superstrings that string interactions can also spontaneously break CPT symmetry. This work [15] suggested that experiments with kaon interferometry would be promising for seeking possible signals of CPT violation due to their high sensitivity.

The SME was conceived to facilitate experimental investigations of Lorentz and CPT symmetry, given the theoretical motivation for violation of these symmetries. An initial step, in 1995, was the introduction of effective interactions. [16] [17] Although Lorentz-breaking interactions are motivated by constructs such as string theory, the low-energy effective action appearing in the SME is independent of the underlying theory. Each term in the effective theory involves the expectation of a tensor field in the underlying theory. These coefficients are small due to Planck-scale suppression, and in principle are measurable in experiments. The first case considered the mixing of neutral mesons, because their interferometric nature makes them highly sensitive to suppressed effects.

In 1997 and 1998, two papers by Don Colladay and Alan Kostelecký gave birth to the minimal SME in flat spacetime. [1] [2] This provided a framework for Lorentz violation across the spectrum of standard-model particles, and provided information about types of signals for potential new experimental searches. [18] [19] [20] [21] [22]

In 2004, the leading Lorentz-breaking terms in curved spacetimes were published, [3] thereby completing the picture for the minimal SME. In 1999, Sidney Coleman and Sheldon Glashow presented a special isotropic limit of the SME. [23] Higher-order Lorentz violating terms have been studied in various contexts, including electrodynamics. [24]

Lorentz transformations: observer vs. particle

The distinction between particle and observer transformations is essential to understanding Lorentz violation in physics because Lorentz violation implies a measurable difference between two systems differing only by a particle Lorentz transformation.

In special relativity, observer Lorentz transformations relate measurements made in reference frames with differing velocities and orientations. The coordinates in the one system are related to those in the other by an observer Lorentz transformation—a rotation, a boost, or a combination of both. Each observer will agree on the laws of physics, since this transformation is simply a change of coordinates. On the other hand, identical experiments can be rotated or boosted relative to each other, while being studied by the same inertial observer. These transformations are called particle transformations, because the matter and fields of the experiment are physically transformed into the new configuration.

In a conventional vacuum, observer and particle transformations can be related to each other in a simple way—basically one is the inverse of the other. This apparent equivalence is often expressed using the terminology of active and passive transformations. The equivalence fails in Lorentz-violating theories, however, because fixed background fields are the source of the symmetry breaking. These background fields are tensor-like quantities, creating preferred directions and boost-dependent effects. The fields extend over all space and time, and are essentially frozen. When an experiment sensitive to one of the background fields is rotated or boosted, i.e. particle transformed, the background fields remain unchanged, and measurable effects are possible. Observer Lorentz symmetry is expected for all theories, including Lorentz violating ones, since a change in the coordinates cannot affect the physics[ clarification needed ]. This invariance is implemented in field theories by writing a scalar lagrangian, with properly contracted spacetime indices. Particle Lorentz breaking enters if the theory includes fixed SME background fields filling the universe.

Building the SME

The SME can be expressed as a Lagrangian with various terms. Each Lorentz-violating term is an observer scalar constructed by contracting standard field operators with controlling coefficients called coefficients for Lorentz violation. These are not parameters, but rather predictions of the theory, since they can in principle be measured by appropriate experiments. The coefficients are expected to be small because of the Planck-scale suppression, so perturbative methods are appropriate. In some cases[ which? ], other suppression mechanisms could mask large Lorentz violations. For instance, large violations that may exist in gravity could have gone undetected so far because of couplings with weak gravitational fields. [25] Stability and causality of the theory have been studied in detail. [26]

Spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking

In field theory, there are two possible ways to implement the breaking of a symmetry: explicit and spontaneous. A key result in the formal theory of Lorentz violation, published by Kostelecký in 2004, is that explicit Lorentz violation leads to incompatibility of the Bianchi identities with the covariant conservation laws for the energy–momentum and spin-density tensors, whereas spontaneous Lorentz breaking evades this difficulty. [3] This theorem requires[ clarification needed ] that any breaking of Lorentz symmetry must be dynamical. Formal studies of the possible causes of the breakdown of Lorentz symmetry include investigations of the fate of the expected Nambu–Goldstone modes. Goldstone's theorem implies that the spontaneous breaking must be accompanied by massless bosons. These modes might be identified with the photon, [27] the graviton, [28] [29] spin-dependent interactions, [30] and spin-independent interactions. [25]

Experimental searches

The possible signals of Lorentz violation in any experiment can be calculated from the SME. [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] It has therefore proven to be a remarkable tool in the search for Lorentz violation across the landscape of experimental physics. Up until the present, experimental results have taken the form of upper bounds on the SME coefficients. Since the results will be numerically different for different inertial reference frames, the standard frame adopted for reporting results is the Sun-centered frame. This frame is a practical and appropriate choice, since it is accessible and inertial on the time scale of hundreds of years.

Typical experiments seek couplings between the background fields and various particle properties such as spin, or propagation direction. One of the key signals of Lorentz violation arises because experiments on Earth are unavoidably rotating and revolving relative to the Sun-centered frame. These motions lead to both annual and sidereal variations of the measured coefficients for Lorentz violation. Since the translational motion of the Earth around the Sun is nonrelativistic, annual variations are typically suppressed by a factor 10−4. This makes sidereal variations the leading time-dependent effect to look for in experimental data. [37]

Measurements of SME coefficients have been done with experiments involving:

All experimental results for SME coefficients are tabulated in the Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation. [38]

See also

Related Research Articles

Faster-than-light travel and communication are the conjectural propagation of matter or information faster than the speed of light. The special theory of relativity implies that only particles with zero rest mass may travel at the speed of light, and that nothing may travel faster.

A tachyon or tachyonic particle is a hypothetical particle that always travels faster than light. Physicists believe that faster-than-light particles cannot exist because they are inconsistent with the known laws of physics. If such particles did exist they could be used to send signals faster than light. According to the theory of relativity this would violate causality, leading to logical paradoxes such as the grandfather paradox. Tachyons would exhibit the unusual property of increasing in speed as their energy decreases, and would require infinite energy to slow to the speed of light. No verifiable experimental evidence for the existence of such particles has been found.

Charge, parity, and time reversal symmetry is a fundamental symmetry of physical laws under the simultaneous transformations of charge conjugation (C), parity transformation (P), and time reversal (T). CPT is the only combination of C, P, and T that is observed to be an exact symmetry of nature at the fundamental level. The CPT theorem says that CPT symmetry holds for all physical phenomena, or more precisely, that any Lorentz invariant local quantum field theory with a Hermitian Hamiltonian must have CPT symmetry.

Doubly special relativity (DSR) – also called deformed special relativity or, by some, extra-special relativity – is a modified theory of special relativity in which there is not only an observer-independent maximum velocity, but also, an observer-independent maximum energy scale and/or a minimum length scale. This contrasts with other Lorentz-violating theories, such as the Standard-Model Extension, where Lorentz invariance is instead broken by the presence of a preferred frame. The main motivation for this theory is that the Planck energy should be the scale where as yet unknown quantum gravity effects become important and, due to invariance of physical laws, this scale should remain fixed in all inertial frames.

In theoretical physics, the Einstein–Cartan theory, also known as the Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory, is a classical theory of gravitation similar to general relativity. The theory was first proposed by Élie Cartan in 1922. Einstein–Cartan theory is the simplest Poincaré gauge theory.

Pran Nath is a theoretical physicist working at Northeastern University, with research focus in elementary particle physics. He holds a Matthews Distinguished University Professor chair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pervez Hoodbhoy</span> Pakistani nuclear physicist and activist (born 1950)

Pervez Amirali Hoodbhoy is a Pakistani nuclear physicist, author, media commentator, and social activist. He is generally considered one of the most vocal, progressive and liberal members of the Pakistani intelligentsia. Hoodbhoy is known for his opposition to nuclear weapons and vocal defence of secularism, freedom of speech, scientific temper and education in Pakistan. Some senior journalists, political and army figures have leveled accusations of treason and unbelief against him but he has rebutted them. Instead he regards himself as a global citizen. His physics-math course lectures, as well as on popular science topics, are widely watched and available online.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Physics beyond the Standard Model</span> Theories trying to extend known physics

Physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) refers to the theoretical developments needed to explain the deficiencies of the Standard Model, such as the inability to explain the fundamental parameters of the standard model, the strong CP problem, neutrino oscillations, matter–antimatter asymmetry, and the nature of dark matter and dark energy. Another problem lies within the mathematical framework of the Standard Model itself: the Standard Model is inconsistent with that of general relativity, and one or both theories break down under certain conditions, such as spacetime singularities like the Big Bang and black hole event horizons.

Test theories of special relativity give a mathematical framework for analyzing results of experiments to verify special relativity.

High-precision experiments could reveal small previously unseen differences between the behavior of matter and antimatter. This prospect is appealing to physicists because it may show that nature is not Lorentz symmetric.

Lorentz-violating neutrino oscillation refers to the quantum phenomenon of neutrino oscillations described in a framework that allows the breakdown of Lorentz invariance. Today, neutrino oscillation or change of one type of neutrino into another is an experimentally verified fact; however, the details of the underlying theory responsible for these processes remain an open issue and an active field of study. The conventional model of neutrino oscillations assumes that neutrinos are massive, which provides a successful description of a wide variety of experiments; however, there are a few oscillation signals that cannot be accommodated within this model, which motivates the study of other descriptions. In a theory with Lorentz violation, neutrinos can oscillate with and without masses and many other novel effects described below appear. The generalization of the theory by incorporating Lorentz violation has shown to provide alternative scenarios to explain all the established experimental data through the construction of global models.

Bumblebee models are effective field theories describing a vector field with a vacuum expectation value that spontaneously breaks Lorentz symmetry. A bumblebee model is the simplest case of a theory with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking.

V. Alan Kostelecký is a theoretical physicist who is a distinguished professor of physics at Indiana University, Bloomington. He is noted for his work on Lorentz symmetry breaking in particle physics. He has been described as the world's leading authority on violations of space-time symmetry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Relativistic images</span> Images of gravitational lensing

Relativistic images are images of gravitational lensing which result due to light deflections by angles .

In physical cosmology, warm inflation is one of two dynamical realizations of cosmological inflation. The other is the standard scenario, sometimes called cold inflation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hughes–Drever experiment</span>

Hughes–Drever experiments are spectroscopic tests of the isotropy of mass and space. Although originally conceived of as a test of Mach's principle, they are now understood to be an important test of Lorentz invariance. As in Michelson–Morley experiments, the existence of a preferred frame of reference or other deviations from Lorentz invariance can be tested, which also affects the validity of the equivalence principle. Thus these experiments concern fundamental aspects of both special and general relativity. Unlike Michelson–Morley type experiments, Hughes–Drever experiments test the isotropy of the interactions of matter itself, that is, of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The accuracy achieved makes this kind of experiment one of the most accurate confirmations of relativity .

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Superfluid vacuum theory</span> Theory of fundamental physics

Superfluid vacuum theory (SVT), sometimes known as the BEC vacuum theory, is an approach in theoretical physics and quantum mechanics where the fundamental physical vacuum is considered as a superfluid or as a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modern searches for Lorentz violation</span> Overview about the modern searches for Lorentz violation

Modern searches for Lorentz violation are scientific studies that look for deviations from Lorentz invariance or symmetry, a set of fundamental frameworks that underpin modern science and fundamental physics in particular. These studies try to determine whether violations or exceptions might exist for well-known physical laws such as special relativity and CPT symmetry, as predicted by some variations of quantum gravity, string theory, and some alternatives to general relativity.

Searches for Lorentz violation involving photons provide one possible test of relativity. Examples range from modern versions of the classic Michelson–Morley experiment that utilize highly stable electromagnetic resonant cavities to searches for tiny deviations from c in the speed of light emitted by distant astrophysical sources. Due to the extreme distances involved, astrophysical studies have achieved sensitivities on the order of parts in 1038.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daya Shankar Kulshreshtha</span> Indian theoretical physicist

Daya Shankar Kulshreshtha is an Indian theoretical physicist, specializing in formal aspects of quantum field theory, string theory, supersymmetry, supergravity and superstring theory, Dirac's instant-form and light-front quantization of field theories and D-brane actions. His work on the models of gravity focuses on the studies of charged compact boson stars and boson shells.

References

  1. 1 2 Colladay, Don; Kostelecký, V. Alan (1997-06-01). "CPT violation and the standard model". Physical Review D. 55 (11): 6760–6774. arXiv: hep-ph/9703464 . Bibcode:1997PhRvD..55.6760C. doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.6760. ISSN   0556-2821. S2CID   7651433.
  2. 1 2 Colladay, D.; Kostelecký, V. Alan (1998-10-26). "Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model". Physical Review D. 58 (11): 116002. arXiv: hep-ph/9809521 . Bibcode:1998PhRvD..58k6002C. doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.116002. ISSN   0556-2821. S2CID   4013391.
  3. 1 2 3 Kostelecký, V. Alan (2004-05-17). "Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model". Physical Review D. 69 (10): 105009. arXiv: hep-th/0312310 . Bibcode:2004PhRvD..69j5009K. doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.105009. ISSN   1550-7998. S2CID   55185765.
  4. ↑ Is Special Relativity Wrong? by Phil Schewe and Ben Stein, AIP Physics News Update Number 712 #1, December 13, 2004.
  5. ↑ Cho, A. (2005-02-11). "Special Relativity Reconsidered". Science. 307 (5711): 866–868. doi: 10.1126/science.307.5711.866 . ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   15705835. S2CID   28092885.
  6. ↑ Has time run out on Einstein's theory? , CNN, June 5, 2002.
  7. ↑ Was Einstein Wrong? Space Station Research May Find Out , JPL News, May 29, 2002.
  8. ↑ Peering Over Einstein's Shoulders by J.R. Minkel, Scientific American, June 24, 2002.
  9. ↑ Greenberg, O. W. (2002-11-18). "CPT Violation Implies Violation of Lorentz Invariance". Physical Review Letters. 89 (23): 231602. arXiv: hep-ph/0201258 . Bibcode:2002PhRvL..89w1602G. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.231602. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   12484997. S2CID   9409237.
  10. ↑ Kostelecký, Alan. The Search for Relativity Violations . Scientific American.
  11. ↑ Russell, Neil. Fabric of the final frontier , New Scientist Magazine issue 2408, 16 August 2003.
  12. ↑ Time Slows When You're on the Fly by Elizabeth Quill, Science, November 13, 2007.
  13. ↑ Kostelecký, V. Alan; Samuel, Stuart (1989-01-15). "Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory". Physical Review D. 39 (2): 683–685. Bibcode:1989PhRvD..39..683K. doi:10.1103/physrevd.39.683. hdl: 2022/18649 . ISSN   0556-2821. PMID   9959689.
  14. ↑ Breaking Lorentz symmetry, Physics World, Mar 10, 2004.
  15. ↑ Alan Kostelecký, V.; Potting, Robertus (1991). "CPT and strings". Nuclear Physics B. 359 (2–3): 545–570. Bibcode:1991NuPhB.359..545A. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90071-5. hdl: 2022/20736 . ISSN   0550-3213.
  16. ↑ Kostelecký, V. Alan; Potting, Robertus (1995-04-01). "CPT, strings, and meson factories". Physical Review D. 51 (7): 3923–3935. arXiv: hep-ph/9501341 . Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51.3923K. doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.3923. ISSN   0556-2821. PMID   10018860. S2CID   1472647.
  17. ↑ IU Physicist offers foundation for uprooting a hallowed principle of physics Archived 2012-09-29 at the Wayback Machine , Indiana University News Room, January 5, 2009.
  18. ↑ New Ways Suggested to Probe Lorentz Violation , American Physical Society News, June 2008.
  19. ↑ Ball, Philip (2004). "Back to the future". Nature. 427 (6974): 482–484. doi: 10.1038/427482a . ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   14765166. S2CID   29609511.
  20. ↑ Lorentz Violations? Not Yet by Phil Schewe, James Riordon, and Ben Stein, Number 623 #2, February 5, 2003.
  21. ↑ Lamoreaux, Steve K. (2002). "Testing times in space". Nature. 416 (6883): 803–804. doi: 10.1038/416803a . ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   11976666. S2CID   28341801.
  22. ↑ Catching relativity violations with atoms by Quentin G. Bailey, APS Viewpoint, Physics 2, 58 (2009).
  23. ↑ Coleman, Sidney; Glashow, Sheldon L. (1999-04-28). "High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance". Physical Review D. 59 (11): 116008. arXiv: hep-ph/9812418 . Bibcode:1999PhRvD..59k6008C. doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.116008. ISSN   0556-2821. S2CID   1273409.
  24. ↑ Kostelecký, V. Alan; Mewes, Matthew (2009-07-29). "Electrodynamics with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension". Physical Review D. 80 (1): 015020. arXiv: 0905.0031 . Bibcode:2009PhRvD..80a5020K. doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.015020. ISSN   1550-7998. S2CID   119241509.
  25. 1 2 Kostelecký, V. Alan; Tasson, Jay D. (2009-01-05). "Prospects for Large Relativity Violations in Matter-Gravity Couplings". Physical Review Letters. 102 (1): 010402. arXiv: 0810.1459 . Bibcode:2009PhRvL.102a0402K. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.010402. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   19257171. S2CID   15236830.
  26. ↑ Kostelecký, V. Alan; Lehnert, Ralf (2001-02-13). "Stability, causality, and Lorentz and CPT violation". Physical Review D. 63 (6): 065008. arXiv: hep-th/0012060 . Bibcode:2001PhRvD..63f5008K. doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.065008. ISSN   0556-2821. S2CID   119074843.
  27. ↑ Bluhm, Robert; Kostelecký, V. Alan (2005-03-22). "Spontaneous Lorentz violation, Nambu-Goldstone modes, and gravity". Physical Review D. 71 (6): 065008. arXiv: hep-th/0412320 . Bibcode:2005PhRvD..71f5008B. doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.065008. ISSN   1550-7998. S2CID   119354909.
  28. ↑ Kostelecký, V. Alan; Potting, Robertus (2009-03-19). "Gravity from spontaneous Lorentz violation". Physical Review D. 79 (6): 065018. arXiv: 0901.0662 . Bibcode:2009PhRvD..79f5018K. doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.065018. ISSN   1550-7998. S2CID   119229843.
  29. ↑ V.A. Kostelecký and R. Potting, Gravity from Local Lorentz Violation, Gen. Rel. Grav. 37, 1675 (2005).
  30. ↑ N. Arkani-Hamed, H.C. Cheng, M. Luty, and J. Thaler, Universal dynamics of spontaneous Lorentz violation and a new spin-dependent inverse-square law force, JHEP 0507, 029 (2005).
  31. ↑ Unification could be ripe for the picking , Physics World, Jan 13, 2009.
  32. ↑ Michelson–Morley experiment is best yet by Hamish Johnston, Physics World, Sep 14, 2009.
  33. ↑ Neutrinos: The key to a theory of everything by Marcus Chown, New Scientist Magazine issue 2615, 1 August 2007.
  34. ↑ Einstein's relativity survives neutrino test , Indiana University News Room, October 15, 2008.
  35. ↑ Relativity violations may make light by Francis Reddy, Astronomy Magazine, June 21, 2005.
  36. ↑ Antimatter and matter may have different properties Archived 2005-11-08 at the Wayback Machine , Indiana University News Room.
  37. ↑ Lorentz symmetry stays intact , Physics World, Feb 25, 2003.
  38. ↑ Kostelecký, V. Alan; Russell, Neil (2011-03-10). "Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation". Reviews of Modern Physics. 83 (1): 11–31. arXiv: 0801.0287 . Bibcode:2011RvMP...83...11K. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.11. ISSN   0034-6861. S2CID   3236027.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.