Strategic control

Last updated

Strategic control is the process used by organizations to control the formation and execution of strategic plans; it is a specialised form of management control, and differs from other forms of management control (in particular from operational control) in respects of its need to handle uncertainty and ambiguity at various points in the control process. [1]

Contents

Strategic control is also focused on the achievement of future goals, rather than the evaluation of past performance. Vis:

The purpose of control at the strategic level is not to answer the question:' 'Have we made the right strategic choices at some time in the past?" but rather "How well are we doing now and how well will we be doing in the immediate future for which reliable information is available?" The point is not to bring to light past errors but to identify needed corrections to steer the corporation in the desired direction. And this determination must be made with respect to currently desirable long-range goals and not against the goals or plans that were established at some time in the past. [1]

As with other control processes, strategic control processes are at their core cybernetic in nature: [2] using one or more 'closed loop' controls to ensure that any observed deviations from expected activity or outcomes are highlighted to managers who can then intervene to correct / adjust the organisation's future activities. John Preble noted the need for these controls to be 'forward looking' when used to control strategy, to give controls that are "future-directed and anticipatory".

Strategic control systems cannot "...wait for a strategy to be executed before getting any feedback on how well it is working. Since this might take several years..." [3]

A related concern for strategic control processes is the amount of time and effort required for the process to work: if either is too great the process will either be ineffective or be ignored by the organisation. [3] [4]

Various authors have proposed that all strategic control systems necessarily comprise a small set of standard elements, the absence of any one of which makes strategic control impossible to achieve (e.g. Goold & Quinn, [5] Muralidharan [6] ). The four elements proposed by Muralidharan are:

These elements imply an active involvement by senior managers in the determination of the strategic activities pursued by the component parts of an organisation, and this has led some to observe that strategic control is most effective in organisations that focus on a single market or area of activity. [7] In organisations undertaking a mix of diverse / unrelated activities (e.g. traditional conglomerates) simpler forms of financial control are more common and perhaps more effective. [8]

History

Although control was one of the six 'functions of management' [9] listed by Henri Fayol in 1917, [10] [11] the idea of strategic control as a distinct activity does not appear in the management literature until the late 1970s (e.g. "Strategic Control: a new task for top management" by J H Horovitz, [12] which was published in 1979, is a candidate for first paper to explicitly discuss the topic), but the first definition of strategic control in a form consistent with modern usage of the term is probably in a paper by Reufli and Sarrazin published in 1981. [1]

As Reufli and Sarrazin observed, the key issue with strategic control mechanisms is the need to deal with uncertainty and ambiguity. [1] A landmark study by Michael Goold and Andrew Campbell [13] identified that a variety of control methods are used across a continuum ranging from purely financial controls at one extreme, through to detailed strategic planning systems at the other. [14] They observed a series of trade-offs between these extremes – financial controls being simpler and therefore cheaper and more flexible to operate, but providing less scope for co-ordination between components of an organisation, strategic planning being time-consuming and expensive to operate, but providing the greatest scope to push for maximum strategic advantage. In the middle of this range, Goold and Campbell described strategic control as allowing firms to "balance competitive and financial ambitions". [13] This idea of a spectrum of control has since been widely adopted. [14] [5] [7]

Although strategic control is a general management topic rather than a prescriptive tool, its reliance on feedback on organisational performance has resulted in a long association with performance management tools such as the balanced scorecard and its derivatives such as the Performance Prism, and with related strategy implementation / execution frameworks such as the ACME framework, [15] the five step process that proposed by Hrebiniak and Joyce., [16] or the approach proposed by Kaplan and Norton in 2001. [17]

Related Research Articles

Project management is the process of leading the work of a team to achieve all project goals within the given constraints. This information is usually described in project documentation, created at the beginning of the development process. The primary constraints are scope, time, and budget. The secondary challenge is to optimize the allocation of necessary inputs and apply them to meet pre-defined objectives.

Strategy is a general plan to achieve one or more long-term or overall goals under conditions of uncertainty. In the sense of the "art of the general", which included several subsets of skills including military tactics, siegecraft, logistics etc., the term came into use in the 6th century C.E. in Eastern Roman terminology, and was translated into Western vernacular languages only in the 18th century. From then until the 20th century, the word "strategy" came to denote "a comprehensive way to try to pursue political ends, including the threat or actual use of force, in a dialectic of wills" in a military conflict, in which both adversaries interact.

Business administration, also known as business management, is the administration of a commercial enterprise. It includes all aspects of overseeing and supervising the business operations of an organization. From the point of view of management and leadership, it also covers fields that include office building administration, accounting, finance, designing, development, quality assurance, data analysis, sales, project management, information-technology management, research and development, marketing and communication studies.

Strategic planning is an organization's process of defining its strategy or direction, and making decisions on allocating its resources to attain strategic goals.

In the field of management, strategic management involves the formulation and implementation of the major goals and initiatives taken by an organization's managers on behalf of stakeholders, based on consideration of resources and an assessment of the internal and external environments in which the organization operates. Strategic management provides overall direction to an enterprise and involves specifying the organization's objectives, developing policies and plans to achieve those objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the plans. Academics and practicing managers have developed numerous models and frameworks to assist in strategic decision-making in the context of complex environments and competitive dynamics. Strategic management is not static in nature; the models can include a feedback loop to monitor execution and to inform the next round of planning.

Middle management is the intermediate management level of a hierarchical organization that is subordinate to the executive management and responsible for ‘team leading’ line managers and/or ‘specialist’ line managers. Middle management is indirectly responsible for junior staff performance and productivity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SWOT analysis</span> Business planning and analysis technique

SWOT analysis is a strategic planning and strategic management technique used to help a person or organization identify Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats related to business competition or project planning. It is sometimes called situational assessment or situational analysis. Additional acronyms using the same components include TOWS and WOTS-UP.

Marketing strategy is an organization's promotional efforts to allocate its resources across a wide range of platforms, channels to increase its sales and achieve sustainable competitive advantage within its corresponding market.

A balanced scorecard is a strategy performance management tool – a well-structured report used to keep track of the execution of activities by staff and to monitor the consequences arising from these actions.

Information technology (IT)governance is a subset discipline of corporate governance, focused on information technology (IT) and its performance and risk management. The interest in IT governance is due to the ongoing need within organizations to focus value creation efforts on an organization's strategic objectives and to better manage the performance of those responsible for creating this value in the best interest of all stakeholders. It has evolved from The Principles of Scientific Management, Total Quality Management and ISO 9001 Quality management system.

The resource-based view (RBV) is a managerial framework used to determine the strategic resources a firm can exploit to achieve sustainable competitive advantage.

The Strategic Management Society (SMS) is a professional society for the advancement of strategic management. The society consists of nearly 3,000 members representing various backgrounds and perspectives from more than eighty different countries. Membership is composed of academics, business practitioners, and consultants. The society has been credited with being a factor in the development of strategic management as a legitimate field of scholarly endeavor. The SMS publishes the Strategic Management Journal, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal and the Global Strategy Journal.

Strategy implementation is the activities within a workplace or organisation designed to manage the activities associated with the delivery of a strategic plan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henri Fayol</span> French mining engineer and executive, developer of "Fayolism"

Henri Fayol was a French mining engineer, mining executive, author and director of mines who developed a general theory of business administration that is often called Fayolism. He and his colleagues developed this theory independently of scientific management but roughly contemporaneously. Like his contemporary Frederick Winslow Taylor, he is widely acknowledged as a founder of modern management methods.

Geoffrey P. Chamberlain's theory of strategy was first published in 2010. The theory draws on the work of Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., Kenneth R. Andrews, Henry Mintzberg and James Brian Quinn but is more specific and attempts to cover the main areas they did not address. Chamberlain analyzes the strategy construct by treating it as a combination of four factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fayolism</span> Management theory developed by Henri Fayol

Fayolism was a theory of management that analyzed and synthesized the role of management in organizations, developed around 1900 by the French manager and management theorist Henri Fayol (1841–1925). It was through Fayol's work as a philosopher of administration that he contributed most widely to the theory and practice of organizational management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shaker Zahra</span>

Shaker A. Zahra is the Robert E. Buuck Chair of Entrepreneurship and professor of strategy and entrepreneurship, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota. He is also the academic director of the Gary S. Holmes Entrepreneurship Center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raymond-Alain Thietart</span> French business school professor (born 1944)

Raymond-Alain Thietart is a French business school professor. He is the author of eight books on strategy and management and over a hundred articles in the same field. His research and teaching focus on organization theory and strategic management.

Competitive landscape is a business analysis method that identifies direct or indirect competitors to help comprehend their mission, vision, core values, niche market, strengths, and weaknesses. Based on the volatile nature of the business world, where companies represent a competition to others, this analysis helps to establish a new mind-set which facilitates the creation of strategic competitiveness.

Strategic planning and uncertainty intertwine in a realistic framework where companies and organizations are bounded to develop and compete in a world dominated by complexity, ambiguity, and uncertainty in which unpredictable, unstoppable and, sometimes, meaningless circumstances may have a direct impact on the expected outcomes. In this scenario, formal planning systems are criticized by a number of academics, who argue that conventional methods, based on classic analytical tools, fail to shape a strategy that can adjust to the changing market and enhance the competitiveness of each business unit, which is the basic principle of a competitive business strategy. Strategy planning systems are supposed to produce the best approaches to concretize long-term objectives. However, since strategy deals with the upcoming future, the strategic context of an organization will always be uncertain, therefore the first choice an organisation has to make is when to act; acting now or when the uncertainty has been resolved.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Reufli, Timothy; Sarrazin, J. (October 1981). "Strategic control of corporate development under ambiguous circumstances". Management Science. 27 (10): 1158–1170. doi:10.1287/mnsc.27.10.1158.
  2. ↑ Beer, Stafford (March 1972). Brain of the Firm: Managerial Cybernetics of Organization. Allen Lane. ISBN   978-0713902198.
  3. 1 2 Preble, John F. (1992). "Towards a Comprehensive System of Strategic Control". The Journal of Management Studies. 29 (4): 391–409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00671.x.
  4. ↑ Goold, Michael; Quinn J. J. (1990). "The Paradox Of Strategic Controls". Strategic Management Journal. 11 (1): 43–57. doi:10.1002/smj.4250110104.
  5. 1 2 Goold, Michael; Quinn J. J. (September 1990). Strategic Control - Milestones for Long Term Performance . Random House. ISBN   978-0631158295.
  6. ↑ Muralidharan, Raman (2004). "A framework for designing strategy content controls". International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 53 (7): 590–601. doi:10.1108/17410400410561213. hdl: 2022/23514 .
  7. 1 2 Hill, Charles. W. L.; Hitt M. A.; Hoskisson R. E. (November 1992). "Cooperative versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms". Organization Science. 3 (4): 501–521. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.4.501.
  8. ↑ Hoskisson, Robert E.; Hitt M. A. (November–December 1988). "Strategic Control Systems and Relative R&D Investment in Large Multiproduct Firms". Strategic Management Journal. 9 (6): 605–621. doi:10.1002/smj.4250090607.
  9. ↑ Forecasting, Planning, Organising, Commanding, Co-ordinating, Controlling
  10. ↑ Fayol, Henri (1916). "Administration industrielle et générale". Bulletin de la Société de l'Industrie Minérale . 10 (3): 5–162.
  11. ↑ Henri Fayol (1949). General and Industrial Management. New York: Pitman Publishing. pp. 107–109. OCLC   825227.
  12. ↑ Horovitz, Jacques H. (1979). "Strategic Control: a new task for top management". Long Range Planning. 12 (1): 2–7. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(79)80001-1.
  13. 1 2 Goold, Michael; Campbell, A. (1987). Strategies and Styles, The role of the centre in managing diversified corporations . Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford. ISBN   978-0631158295.
  14. 1 2 Micheli, Pietro; Mura M.; Agliati M. (2011). "Exploring the roles of performance measurement systems in strategy implementation". International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 31 (10): 1115–1139. doi:10.1108/01443571111172453.
  15. ↑ "ACME Framework". 2GC Active Management. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  16. ↑ Hrebiniak, Lawrence G.; Joyce W.F. (1984). Implementing Strategy. Macmillan, New York. ISBN   978-0023572906.
  17. ↑ Kaplan, Robert S; Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy Focused Organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment . Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN   1-57851-250-6.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.