Sunita Sah

Last updated

Sunita Sah
Sunita Sah.jpg
OccupationProfessor and author
SubjectManagement psychology
Website
www.sunitasah.com

Sunita Sah is a professor of management and organizations at Cornell University's SC Johnson Graduate School of Management, and a core faculty fellow in the new Cornell Health Policy Center. [1] Her book, Defy: The Power of No in a World that Demands Yes, will be published by Penguin Random House in January 2025. [2] Sah is the director of Cornell University's Academic Leadership Institute. She was formerly the KPMG Professor of Management Studies at Cambridge Judge Business School of the University of Cambridge, where she remains an Honorary Fellow. [3]

Contents

Early life and education

Sah grew up in England and attended Greenhead College in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire. She attended Edinburgh University and earned a B.Sc. (Hons) in psychology and a MBChB (UK equivalent of the US MD) in medicine and surgery. [4] [5] She worked as a junior doctor at the Western General Hospital before moving into management consultancy. She moved to the United States in 2008 and earned an M.S. and Ph.D. in organizational behavior in 2010 at Carnegie Mellon University's Tepper School of Business.

Career

Sah is known internationally for her research on conflicts of interest and disclosure, behavioral ethics, influence, compliance, and defiance. She identified the "panhandler effect" and "insinuation anxiety" in advisor-advisee dynamics. [6] [7] She revealed how conflict of interest disclosures can increase compliance and have unintended effects. [8] [9] Her research on forensic science demonstrates how a lack of scientific rigor in forensic processes can lead to improper conviction and incarceration. [10] [11]

Among her speaking engagements, Sah was the keynote speaker at Morgan Stanley's 2024 Women in Leadership Summit. [12] She also keynoted at the Executive MSc Programme Graduation and Alumni Event for the London School of Economics. [13]

Selected awards

Selected publications

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social science</span> Branch of science that studies society and its relationships

Social science is one of the branches of science, devoted to the study of societies and the relationships among members within those societies. The term was formerly used to refer to the field of sociology, the original "science of society", established in the 18th century. In addition to sociology, it now encompasses a wide array of academic disciplines, including anthropology, archaeology, economics, geography, linguistics, management, communication studies, psychology, culturology and political science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scientific misconduct</span> Violation of codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in scientific research

Scientific misconduct is the violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in the publication of professional scientific research. It is violation of scientific integrity: violation of the scientific method and of research ethics in science, including in the design, conduct, and reporting of research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of academic disciplines</span> Academic fields of study or professions

An academic discipline or field of study is a branch of knowledge, taught and researched as part of higher education. A scholar's discipline is commonly defined by the university faculties and learned societies to which they belong and the academic journals in which they publish research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Applied science</span> Practical application of scientific knowledge

Applied science is the application of the scientific method and scientific knowledge to attain practical goals. It includes a broad range of disciplines, such as engineering and medicine. Applied science is often contrasted with basic science, which is focused on advancing scientific theories and laws that explain and predict natural or other phenomena.

Forensic psychology is the application of scientific knowledge and methods to help answer legal questions arising in criminal, civil, contractual, or other judicial proceedings. Forensic psychology includes research on various psychology-law topics, such as jury selection, reducing systemic racism in criminal law; eyewitness testimony, evaluating competency to stand trial; or assessing military veterans for service-connected disability compensation. The American Psychological Association's Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists reference several psychology subdisciplines, such as social, clinical, experimental, counseling, and neuropsychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic psychiatry</span> Subspeciality of psychiatry, related to criminology

Forensic psychiatry is a subspeciality of psychiatry and is related to criminology. It encompasses the interface between law and psychiatry. According to the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, it is defined as "a subspecialty of psychiatry in which scientific and clinical expertise is applied in legal contexts involving civil, criminal, correctional, regulatory, or legislative matters, and in specialized clinical consultations in areas such as risk assessment or employment." A forensic psychiatrist provides services – such as determination of competency to stand trial – to a court of law to facilitate the adjudicative process and provide treatment, such as medications and psychotherapy, to criminals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American College of Physicians</span> American medical-specialty organization

The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a Philadelphia-based national organization of internal medicine physicians, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. With 161,000 members, ACP is the largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States. Its flagship journal, the Annals of Internal Medicine, is among the most widely cited peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.

Professional responsibility is a set of duties within the concept of professional ethics for those who exercise a unique set of knowledge and skill as professionals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ICMJE recommendations</span>

The ICMJE recommendations are a set of guidelines produced by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for standardising the ethics, preparation and formatting of manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals for publication. Compliance with the ICMJE recommendations is required by most leading biomedical journals. Levels of real compliance are subject to debate. As of 9 January 2020, 5570 journals worldwide claim to follow the ICMJE recommendations.

In science, priority is the credit given to the individual or group of individuals who first made the discovery or proposed the theory. Fame and honours usually go to the first person or group to publish a new finding, even if several researchers arrived at the same conclusion independently and at the same time. Thus, between two or more independent discoverers, the first to publish is the legitimate winner. Hence, the tradition is often referred to as the priority rule, the procedure of which is nicely summed up in a phrase "publish or perish", because there are no second prizes. In a way, the race to be first inspires risk-taking that can lead to scientific breakthroughs which is beneficial to the society. On the other hand, it can create unhealthy competition and incentives to publish low-quality findings, which can lead to an unreliable published literature and harm scientific progress.

Guglielmo Gulotta has been a full professor at the University of Turin, Department of Psychology. He continues his career in law as a criminal barrister of the Milan Court, and his law activity takes him all around Italy. He is a psychologist and a psychotherapist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Rothman (medical historian)</span> American medical historian (1937–2020)

David Jay Rothman was professor of History at Columbia University and of Social Medicine at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. He founded and served as the president of the Institute on Medicine as a Profession (IMAP). Rothman's work focused on American social history, the history of medicine and current health care practices. His research also explored human rights in medicine, including organ trafficking, AIDS, and the ethics of research in developing countries.

Frontiers Media SA is a publisher of peer-reviewed, open access, scientific journals currently active in science, technology, and medicine. It was founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry Markram. Frontiers is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with offices in the United Kingdom, Spain, and China. In 2022, Frontiers employed more than 1,400 people, across 14 countries. All Frontiers journals are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Nudge theory is a concept in behavioral economics, decision making, behavioral policy, social psychology, consumer behavior, and related behavioral sciences that proposes adaptive designs of the decision environment as ways to influence the behavior and decision-making of groups or individuals. Nudging contrasts with other ways to achieve compliance, such as education, legislation or enforcement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eldar Shafir</span>

Eldar Shafir is an American behavioral scientist, and the co-author of Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. He is the Class of 1987 Professor in Behavioral Science and Public Policy; Professor of Psychology and Public Affairs at Princeton University Department of Psychology and the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, and Inaugural Director of Princeton’s Kahneman-Treisman Center for Behavioral Science and Public Policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arturo Casadevall</span> Cuban-American scientist

Arturo Casadevall is a Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology and Infectious Diseases at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and the Alfred and Jill Sommer Professor and Chair of the W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. He is an internationally recognized expert in infectious disease research, with a focus on fungal and bacterial pathogenesis and basic immunology of antibody structure-function. He was elected a member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2022.

Metascience is the use of scientific methodology to study science itself. Metascience seeks to increase the quality of scientific research while reducing inefficiency. It is also known as "research on research" and "the science of science", as it uses research methods to study how research is done and find where improvements can be made. Metascience concerns itself with all fields of research and has been described as "a bird's eye view of science". In the words of John Ioannidis, "Science is the best thing that has happened to human beings ... but we can do it better."

Allegiance bias in behavioral sciences is a bias resulted from the investigator's or researcher's allegiance to a specific school of thought. Researchers/investigators have been exposed to many types of branches of psychology or schools of thought. Naturally they adopt a school or branch that fits with their paradigm of thinking. More specifically, allegiance bias is when this leads therapists, researchers, etc. believing that their school of thought or treatment is superior to others. Their superior belief to these certain schools of thought can bias their research in effective treatments trials or investigative situations leading to allegiance bias. Reason being is that they may have devoted their thinking to certain treatments they have seen work in their past experiences. This can lead to errors in interpreting the results of their research. Their “pledge” to stay within their own paradigm of thinking may affect their ability to find more effective treatments to help the patient or situation they are investigating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conflicts of interest in academic publishing</span>

Conflicts of interest (COIs) often arise in academic publishing. Such conflicts may cause wrongdoing and make it more likely. Ethical standards in academic publishing exist to avoid and deal with conflicts of interest, and the field continues to develop new standards. Standards vary between journals and are unevenly applied. According to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, "[a]uthors have a responsibility to evaluate the integrity, history, practices and reputation of the journals to which they submit manuscripts".

References

  1. Johnson, Cornell SC. "Faculty Profile". Cornell SC Johnson. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  2. "Sunita Sah". PenguinRandomhouse.com. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  3. Brown, Cordelia (6 April 2021). "Professor Sunita Sah has been elected as a Fellow of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology". University of Cambridge, news and awards. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  4. "Sunita Sah". The Conversation. 25 August 2016. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  5. "Sunita Sah – Cornell Institute for Healthy Futures". ihf.cornell.edu. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  6. Sah, Sunita; Malaviya, Prashant; Thompson, Debora (1 July 2018). "Conflict of interest disclosure as an expertise cue: Differential effects due to automatic versus deliberative processing". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 147: 127–146. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.05.008. ISSN   0749-5978.
  7. 1 2 Sah, Sunita (22 October 2019). "Opinion: Why you find it so hard to resist taking bad advice". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  8. Sah, Sunita (22 December 2023). "The paradox of disclosure: shifting policies from revealing to resolving conflicts of interest". Behavioural Public Policy: 1–12. doi: 10.1017/bpp.2023.37 . ISSN   2398-063X.
  9. Sah, Sunita (8 July 2016). "Gray Matter: The Paradox of Disclosure". The New York Times.
  10. 1 2 Bell, Suzanne; Sah, Sunita; Albright, Thomas D.; Gates, S. James; Denton, M. Bonner; Casadevall, Arturo (May 2018). "A call for more science in forensic science". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (18): 4541–4544. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.4541B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712161115 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   5939058 . PMID   29650539.
  11. Sah, Sunita (2017). "Forensic Science Must Be Scientific". Scientific American. 317 (4): 12–13. Bibcode:2017SciAm.317d..12S. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1017-12. ISSN   0036-8733. JSTOR   27109318. PMID   29565868.
  12. Musa, Ileana. "Morgan Stanley, 2024 Women's Leadership Summit".
  13. Banerjee, Sanchayan; Zimmermann, Laura; Hortal, Alejandro; Dold, Malte; Ivchenko, Andriy; Lades, Leonhard; McDonald, Rebecca; Savani, Manu M (14 March 2024). "Recent developments in Behavioural Public Policy: IBPPC 2022". Behavioural Public Policy. 8 (4): 633–638. doi:10.1017/bpp.2024.12. ISSN   2398-063X.
  14. "Fellows | SPSP". spsp.org. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  15. "Sunita Sah | RSF". www.russellsage.org. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  16. "Department of Justice and The National Institute of Standards and Technology Name Six Experts as New Members of National Commission on Forensic Science". United States Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs. 6 August 2015.
  17. "Best Paper Awards - Managerial and Organizational Cognition Division". moc.aom.org. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  18. "Sunita Sah | Edmond & Lily Safra Center for Ethics". ethics.harvard.edu. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  19. "Experimental and Empirical Research in Monet Business Ethics II" (PDF). The Society for Business Ethics Newsletter. XXI (1): 12. Summer 2010.
  20. Sah, Sunita (June 2024). "Deep Professionalism: Charting a Path for Effective Conflict-of-Interest Management in Medicine". Journal of General Internal Medicine. 39 (8): 1503–1505. doi:10.1007/s11606-024-08668-z. ISSN   0884-8734. PMC   11169382 . PMID   38336957.
  21. Sah, Sunita (22 December 2023). "The paradox of disclosure: shifting policies from revealing to resolving conflicts of interest". Behavioural Public Policy: 1–12. doi: 10.1017/bpp.2023.37 . ISSN   2398-063X.
  22. Sah, Sunita (August 2022). "The Professionalism Paradox: A Sense of Professionalism Increases Vulnerability to Conflicts of Interest". Academy of Management Perspectives. 36 (3): 896–918. doi:10.5465/amp.2021.0033. ISSN   1558-9080.
  23. Rose, Susannah L.; Sah, Sunita; Dweik, Raed; Schmidt, Cory; Mercer, MaryBeth; Mitchum, Ariane; Kattan, Michael; Karafa, Matthew; Robertson, Christopher (1 September 2021). "Patient responses to physician disclosures of industry conflicts of interest: A randomized field experiment". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Behavioral Field Evidence on Ethics and Misconduct. 166: 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.005. ISSN   0749-5978.
  24. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3134477
  25. Jatoi, Ismail; Sah, Sunita (18 March 2019). "Clinical practice guidelines and the overuse of health care services: need for reform". Canadian Medical Association Journal. 191 (11): E297–E298. doi:10.1503/cmaj.181496. ISSN   0820-3946. PMC   6422782 . PMID   30885967.
  26. Sah, Sunita (November 2017). "Policy solutions to conflicts of interest: the value of professional norms". Behavioural Public Policy. 1 (2): 177–189. doi:10.1017/bpp.2016.9. ISSN   2398-063X.
  27. Sah, Sunita (1 October 2017). "Let's Keep the Science in Forensic Science". Scientific American. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  28. Sah, Sunita (1 March 2015). "Investigations Before Examinations: "This Is How We Practice Medicine Here"". JAMA Internal Medicine. 175 (3): 342–343. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7549. ISSN   2168-6106. PMID   25599225.
  29. Sah, Sunita; Fugh-Berman, Adriane (October 2013). "Physicians under the Influence: Social Psychology and Industry Marketing Strategies". Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 41 (3): 665–672. doi:10.1111/jlme.12076. ISSN   1073-1105. PMID   24088157.
  30. Sah, Sunita (21 November 2023). "Speak Up at Thanksgiving. Your Health Demands It". The New York Times: Opinion.
  31. Sah, Sunita. "Most people believe they don't see color–but only empirically proven 'blinding' policies can reduce discrimination in the labor market and criminal justice system". Fortune. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  32. Sah, Sunita. "For Justice, Forensic Science Must Be Scientific: The Case Of Kevin Keith". Forbes. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  33. Sah, Sunita (26 October 2021). "What to Do About "Back to the Office" Jitters". Harvard Business Review. ISSN   0017-8012 . Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  34. Sah, Sunita (3 June 2021). "Mental health: pressure to return to the office could be making employees more anxious". The Conversation. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  35. "Research: Missing Product Information Doesn't Bother Consumers as Much as It Should". Harvard Business Review. 28 September 2017. ISSN   0017-8012 . Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  36. Sah, Sunita; Casadevall, Arturo; Bell, Suzanne; Gates Jr., S. James; Albright, Thomas D.; Denton, M. Bonner. "We Must Strengthen the "Science" in Forensic Science". Scientific American. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  37. Sah, Sunita (10 July 2016). "The Paradox of Disclosure". The New York Times.