Symbolic self-completion theory

Last updated

The theory of symbolic self-completion is a psychological theory which holds that individuals seek to acquire and display symbols that are strongly related to what they perceive as the ideal self. [1] For example, relatively effeminate boys who want to appear macho may use products associated with manliness—such as a strong cologne or a silver watch—in hopes of symbolically fulfilling their self-definitions, i.e. becoming manly. Such cases of symbolic self-completion are seen in internet communication, marketing and advertising, and consumer behavior.

Contents

Origins

The theory of symbolic self-completion has its origins in the symbolic interactionist school of thought. As expressed by George Mead in Mind, Self and Society, symbolic interactionism suggests that the self is defined by the way that society responds to the individual. [2] This idea helped shape the central ideas put forth in the book Symbolic Self-Completion, which states that individuals tend to define themselves using symbols of accomplishment and that they use symbols to communicate their self-definitions to society. [1] Depending on the area of self-definition to which these symbols pertain, a different self-definition is thus exhibited. [1]

Key concepts

Self-definitional symbols

Self-definitional symbols are the objects that individuals use to communicate their self-definitions to society. Symbols can be both material and non-material, including anything ranging from utterances, behaviors, and socially recognized markers such as material possessions and social status. [3] They are defined as "any facet of the person that has the potential to signal to others (who understand the symbol as related to the identity) that one possesses the identity in question." [3] Because it is through these symbols that individuals build their self-definitions around and communicate them to society, symbols are "the building blocks of self-definition." [1] Thus, symbols are meaningful to individuals only insofar as they adequately represent individuals' self-definitions, regarding the status of accomplishment in the areas individuals believe are important to their self-definitions. When individuals lack symbols to express their self-definitions, they seek to "display alternative symbols of attainment." [4]

Research has shown that when individuals are deficient in any self-definitional area, this deficiency produces a state of tension and a sense of incompleteness in their self-definitions. [1] Individuals are motivated to reduce this tension by using alternate symbols of accomplishment in the relevant self-definitional area. [1] In the study "Symbolic Self-completion, Attempted Influence, and Self-Deprecation," Robert Wicklund, Peter Gollwitzer and James Hilton asked participants to write an essay teaching people how to perform an activity important to them and then indicate how many people should be required to revise their essays. Results of this study showed that the fewer the years of education or experience participants seemed to have in their respective activities, the higher the number of people participants thought should be required to revise their essays. [5] The higher this number was, the more participants put themselves in a position to influence others; researchers interpreted this relationship as a means of symbolic compensation for lacking the relevant self-definitional area. [5]

An additional part of this study asked a group of men to make a statement about their ability in the self-definitional area. Results of this part of the study showed that the less education and experience the men had, the less willing they were to provide a negative evaluation of themselves. [5] This behavior remained consistent, even when the men were told that the attractive female confederate preferred men who were critical of themselves. [5] This finding shows people are willing to self-symbolize even when they know the self-symbolizing behavior will be negatively received by society. [5] Such findings indicate that individuals are more concerned with whether their behaviors will be reflective of their self-definitions than with whether the behaviors induce positive or negative judgments from others. Altogether, these findings indicate that "influencing others, as well as positive self-descriptions, can further the individual's sense of having a complete self-definition." [5]

Self-definitional threats

Individuals' self-definitions can change for purposes of self-esteem protection and maintenance. These changes are likely to occur in consideration of the "relative performance and the psychological similarity (closeness) and dissimilarity (distance) of others." [6] Certain dimensions of individuals' self-definitions can become "less self-definitional" when others who are psychologically similar to them outperforms them in those areas. [6] As such, self-definitions lend themselves to change—however, individuals may opt to strengthen their self-definitions in the face of self-definitional threats. Self-definitional threat refers to a situation in which individuals feel their identities are uncertain or threatened or they feel insecure in an identity they are committed to. [7] In such cases, individuals are more likely to value symbols that reinforce those identities. [7]

The study "Reactions to self-discrepant feedback: Feminist attitude and symbolic self-completion" shows how a threat to one's identity also motivates individuals to engage in symbolic self-completion as a means of reducing the tension it causes. [8] The researchers Rudolf Schiffmann and Doris Nelkenbrecher asked a group of feminist participants to subscribe to a feminist journal after being given feedback on their feminist attitudes. [8] The women who were described as less feminist were more likely to subscribe to the feminist journal as a means of symbolically "completing" their self-definition. [8]

Related to this study is "Psychological Antecedents of Conspicuous Consumption" by Ottmar L. Braun and Wicklund. This study was conducted in six separate studies, the first of which involved interviews of law students and attorneys. This first part of the study found that law students were more likely than practicing attorneys to think that it is important to have the "outward manifestations of an attorney," supporting the idea that individuals "striving toward a particular identity" and are "more inexperienced in that identity realm" are more prone to claim that they "can be recognized as belonging to that identity." [3]

Applications

Symbolic self-completion in Internet communication

More recent studies have shown how symbolic self-completion influences individuals' communication in online media platforms. For example, Cindy and Eddie Harmon-Jones and Brandon Schmeichel have shown how individuals' need for self-definition affects whether they share symbols of self-definitional attainment online. [9] These researchers examined academic web pages and email signature files to see what types of academic departments and professors were more likely to enlist professional titles. [9] The researchers found that the lower an academic department was ranked within National Research Council Rankings, the higher the number of professional titles the professors in that department displayed in their websites. [9] Similarly, the lower the annual rate of publications and citations professors seemed to have, the higher the number of professional titles they enlisted in their email signatures. These correlations suggest that the enlistment of professional titles online serve as alternate symbols of accomplishment in their self-definitional areas; the more they felt they were lacking in a certain area, the more likely they were to engage in symbolic self-completion online regarding that particular area. [9]

Symbolic self-completion in advertising

Old spice deodorant body spray Old spice deodorant body spray.jpg
Old spice deodorant body spray

The theory of symbolic self-completion has direct application in the advertisement industry. The media leads consumers to equate advertised products targeting their feelings of "incompleteness" with self-definitional symbols to make up for that incompleteness. [10] Although the symbols that each consumer ascribes to may be different in every case, these symbols as a whole can nonetheless be used to improve the individual consumers' perception of themselves. The product-symbols give some consumers a sense of completeness, since "self-perceptions are influenced by product use/ownership when the product has a strong user image and the consumer does not have a well formed self-image." [11] For example, a deodorant advertisement may appeal to a male consumer's self-definitional need for masculinity, by suggesting that he will become more masculine if he uses the deodorant advertised. [7] The Old Spice brand famously uses phrases such as "smell like a man, man" when advertising their products. The "Smell Like A Man, Man" campaign led to Old Spice becoming the number one brand of deodorant. [12] By displaying these product-symbols, consumers improve their sense of self and feel more confident about how others might perceive them. [7]

Symbolic self-completion and materialism

Braun and Wicklund suggest that there is a "compensatory relation between person's security" and certain kinds of conspicuous consumption, but that these relations cannot exist without individuals' perceived "incompleteness [of]" and "commitment to the identity in question." [3] Thus, much of what is colloquially referred to as the "mid-life crisis" can be explained by the theory of symbolic self-completion. A classic example of the mid-life crisis is a 40-year-old man buying a red sports car. The man is unsure as to whether he has made the right choices in his life and if he has been leading a successful career. The man then counters his insecurity by purchasing a material object that functions as a status symbol, something that both he and others will recognize as a mark of success. [7]

The relationship between self-completion theory and materialism is further shown through individuals' tendency to externalize their concerns about their lives by acquiring symbol-objects that reinforce and improve their self-definitions. [7] In terms of goods/objects as individuals' status symbols, greater emphasis is placed on tangible, material objects, as they can be recognized and understood as status symbols by a wider audience than are intangible and abstract ideas. In the same vein, materialism reinforces symbolic self-completion particularly in a societies that are structured in such a way that the consumption of prestigious objects is seen as the best remedy for insecurity. This reinforcement is due to the fact that in such societies, individuals see material wealth as the best source of comforting reassurance to counter insecurity [7]

Related Research Articles

Behavior or behaviour is the range of actions and mannerisms made by individuals, organisms, systems or artificial entities in some environment. These systems can include other systems or organisms as well as the inanimate physical environment. It is the computed response of the system or organism to various stimuli or inputs, whether internal or external, conscious or subconscious, overt or covert, and voluntary or involuntary.

Cognitive dissonance Stress from contradictory beliefs

In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is the perception of contradictory information. Relevant items of information include a person's actions, feelings, ideas, beliefs, values, and things in the environment. Cognitive dissonance is typically experienced as psychological stress when persons participate in an action that goes against one or more of those things. According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not psychologically consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent. The discomfort is triggered by the person's belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein the individual tries to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.

Sexual objectification Disregarding personality or dignity; reducing a person to a commodity or sex object

Sexual objectification is the act of treating a person solely as an object of sexual desire. Objectification more broadly means treating a person as a commodity or an object without regard to their personality or dignity. Objectification is most commonly examined at the level of a society, but can also refer to the behavior of individuals and is a type of dehumanization.

Symbolic interactionism Sociological theory focused on cultural symbols exchanged during interpersonal interactions

Symbolic interactionism is a sociological theory that develops from practical considerations and alludes to particular effects of communication and interaction in people to make images and normal implications, for deduction and correspondence with others. According to Macionis, symbolic interactionism is "a framework for building theory that sees society as the product of everyday interactions of individuals". In other words, it is a frame of reference to better understand how individuals interact with one another to create symbolic worlds, and in return, how these worlds shape individual behaviors. It is a framework that helps understand how society is preserved and created through repeated interactions between individuals. The interpretation process that occurs between interactions helps create and recreate meaning. It is the shared understanding and interpretations of meaning that affect the interaction between individuals. Individuals act on the premise of a shared understanding of meaning within their social context. Thus, interaction and behavior is framed through the shared meaning that objects and concepts have attached to them. From this view, people live in both natural and symbolic environments.

In-group favoritism, sometimes known as in-group–out-group bias, in-group bias, intergroup bias, or in-group preference, is a pattern of favoring members of one's in-group over out-group members. This can be expressed in evaluation of others, in allocation of resources, and in many other ways.

Terror management theory Social and evolutionary psychology theory

Terror management theory (TMT) is both a social and evolutionary psychology theory originally proposed by Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, and Tom Pyszczynski and codified in their book The Worm at the Core: On the Role of Death in Life (2015). It proposes that a basic psychological conflict results from having a self-preservation instinct while realizing that death is inevitable and to some extent unpredictable. This conflict produces terror, which is managed through a combination of escapism and cultural beliefs that act to counter biological reality with more significant and enduring forms of meaning and value.

Social psychology (sociology)

In sociology, social psychology studies the relationship between the individual and society. Although studying many of the same substantive topics as its counterpart in the field of psychology, sociological social psychology places relatively more emphasis on the influence of social structure and culture on individual outcomes, such as personality, behavior, and one's position in social hierarchies. Researchers broadly focus on higher levels of analysis, directing attention mainly to groups and the arrangement of relationships among people. This subfield of sociology is broadly recognized as having three major perspectives: Symbolic interactionism, social structure and personality, and structural social psychology.

Ego depletion refers to the idea that self-control or willpower draws upon a limited pool of mental resources that can be used up. When the energy for mental activity is low, self-control is typically impaired, which would be considered a state of ego depletion. In particular, experiencing a state of ego depletion impairs the ability to control oneself later on. A depleting task requiring self-control can have a hindering effect on a subsequent self-control task, even if the tasks are seemingly unrelated. Self-control plays a valuable role in the functioning of the self on both individualistic and interpersonal levels. Ego depletion is therefore a critical topic in experimental psychology, specifically social psychology, because it is a mechanism that contributes to the understanding of the processes of human self-control. There have both been studies to support and to question the validity of ego-depletion as a theory.

Social identity is the portion of an individual's self-concept derived from perceived membership in a relevant social group.

Throughout the long history of consumer research, there has been much interest regarding how consumers choose which brand to buy and why they continue to purchase these brands. Self-branding describes the process in which consumers match their own self-concept with the images of a certain brand.

Feminist psychology is a form of psychology centered on social structures and gender. Feminist psychology critiques historical psychological research as done from a male perspective with the view that males are the norm. Feminist psychology is oriented on the values and principles of feminism.

The hedonic music consumption model was created by music researchers Kathleen Lacher and Richard Mizeski in 1994. Their goal was to use this model to examine the responses that listening to rock music creates, and to find if these responses influenced the listener's intention to later purchase the music. The article begins with a discussion of why the issue of music consumption is important. Music is then explored as an aesthetic product, prior to a discussion of what hedonic consumption is, as well as its origins, and concludes with an in-depth look at the model itself.

Consumer culture theory (CCT) is the study of consumption choices and behaviors from a social and cultural point of view, as opposed to an economic or psychological one.

Peter Max Gollwitzer is a German professor of psychology in the Psychology Department at New York University. His research centers on how goals and plans affect cognition, emotion, and behavior.

Social identity approach Research and theory pertaining to two intertwined, but distinct, social psychological theories.[

The term social identity approach refers to research and theory pertaining to social identity theory and self-categorization theory—two intertwined, but distinct, social psychological theories. The term "social identity approach" arose as an attempt to mitigate against the tendency to conflate the two theories, as well as the tendency to mistakenly believe one theory to be a component of the other. These theories should be thought of as overlapping. While there are similarities, self categorisation theory has greater explanatory scope and has been investigated in a broader range of empirical conditions. Self-categorization theory can also be thought of as developed to address limitations of social identity theory. Specifically the limited manner in which social identity theory deals with the cognitive processes that underpin the behaviour it describes. Although this term may be useful when contrasting broad social psychological movements, when applying either theory it is thought of as beneficial to distinguish carefully between the two theories in such a way that their specific characteristics can be retained.

In cultural studies, media culture refers to the current Western capitalist society that emerged and developed from the 20th century, under the influence of mass media. The term alludes to the overall impact and intellectual guidance exerted by the media, not only on public opinion but also on tastes and values.

Psychology of eating meat Psychology surrounding human consumption of meat

The psychology of eating meat is a complex area of study illustrating the confluence of morality, emotions, cognition, and personality characteristics. Research into the psychological and cultural factors of meat-eating suggests correlations with masculinity; support for hierarchical values; and reduced openness to experience. Because meat eating is widely practiced but is sometimes associated with ambivalence, it has been used as a case study in moral psychology to illustrate theories of cognitive dissonance and moral disengagement. Research into the consumer psychology of meat is relevant both to meat industry marketing and to advocates of reduced meat consumption.

Objective self-awareness is attention focused on the self as a socially evaluable object, as defined by Shell

Consumer stereotyping is a process of creation of generalizations about consumption objects of members from a particular social category.

Consumer identity is the consumption pattern through which a consumer describes themselves.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wicklund, Robert A.; Gollwitzer, Peter M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates: L. Erlbaum Associates. ISBN   978-0898592139.
  2. ↑ Mead, George (1997). Mind, Self and Society (PDF). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. ISBN   9780226516684 . Retrieved 6 November 2014.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Braun, Ottmar L.; Wicklund, Robert A. (1989). "Psychological Antecedents of Conspicuous Consumption". Journal of Economic Psychology. 10 (2): 161–187. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(89)90018-4.
  4. ↑ Harmon-Jones, Cindy; Schmeichel, Brandon J.; Harmon-Jones, Eddie (2009). "Symbolic self-completion in academia: Evidence from department web pages and email signature files" (PDF). European Journal of Social Psychology. 39 (2): 311–316. doi:10.1002/ejsp.541.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Gollwitzer, Peter; Wicklund, Robert (1981). "Symbolic Self-Completion, Attempted Influence, and Self-Depreciation" (PDF). Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2 (2): 89–114. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0202_2 . Retrieved 2 November 2014.
  6. 1 2 Tesser, Abraham; Campbell, Jennifer (Sep 1980). "Self-Definition: The Impact of the Relative Performance and Similarity of Others". Social Psychology Quarterly. 43 (3): 341–347. doi:10.2307/3033737. JSTOR   3033737.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Moss, Dr. Simon. "Symbolic Self Completion Theory". Psychlopedia. Retrieved 31 October 2014.
  8. 1 2 3 Schiffmann, Rudolf; Nelkenbrecher, Doris (1994). "Reactions to self-discrepant feedback: Feminist attitude and symbolic self-completion". European Journal of Social Psychology. 24 (2): 317–327. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240209.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Harmon-Jones, Cindy; Harmon-Jones, Eddie; Brandon, Schmeichel (June 2008). "Symbolic self-completion in academia: Evidence from department web pages and email signature files" (PDF). European Journal of Social Psychology. 39 (2): 311–316. doi:10.1002/ejsp.541 . Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  10. ↑ Elliott, Richard; Wattanasuwan, Kritsadarat (1998). "Consumption and the Symbolic Project of the Self". Acr European Advances. E-03. Retrieved 31 October 2014.
  11. ↑ Wright, Newell; Claiborne, C.; Sirgy, M. (1992). "The Effects of Product Symbolism on Consumer Self Concept". Acr North American Advances. NA-19. Retrieved 31 October 2014.
  12. ↑ "The Smell Like A Man, Man Campaign" (PDF). P&G. Procter and Gamble. Retrieved 21 November 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.