Texas Alliance for Life

Last updated

The Texas Alliance for Life is an anti-abortion lobbying organization in the State of Texas. [1] The group opposes "the advocacy and practice of abortion (except to preserve the mother's life)." [2] The group also opposes euthanasia and "all forms of assisted suicide." [2] It is based in Austin, Texas. [3]

Contents

Leadership and political activities

Joe Pojman is the founder and executive director of Texas Alliance for Life. [4] He is a registered lobbyist in Texas, [5] and in 2013 said that he had "been lobbying the Capitol for 26 years." [6]

Texas Alliance for Life helped draft a strict state anti-abortion law (House Bill 2 of 2013) that imposed targeted regulation of abortion providers, leading to the closure more than two dozen clinics across Texas. [7] The legislation was struck down as unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt in 2016. [8] After the ruling, the Texas Alliance for Life shifted its focus to pushing for "increasing funding to the state's Alternatives to Abortion program." [9]

The group has pushed for the defunding of Planned Parenthood. [10] [11] In the 2012 session, Pojman said the group's top priority was to "'continue to defund Planned Parenthood' by banning health providers affiliated with abortion providers from participating in the state's Medicaid program." [12] In 2015, Pojman celebrated the Texas Legislature's passage of legislation laws that the group had pushed for to expel Planned Parenthood from a joint state-federal cancer screening program "and cut off the last bit of taxpayer money the organization received." [13] Planned Parenthood clinics that had previous received cancer screening funds under the program were already barred from performing abortions." [13]

Pojman supported Texas's highly controversial proposed "fetal remains" regulation, which sought to compel the "cremation or interment of aborted or miscarried fetuses." [14] [15]

The group has often clashed with another Texas anti-abortion group, the Texas Right to Life PAC. [1] [3] [16] [10] The Dallas News reported: "The policy differences the groups deem insurmountable would probably be imperceptible to most people. A bill by Texas Alliance for Life is more likely to include exceptions in extreme circumstances, whereas those supported by Texas Right to Life are usually more uncompromising." [1] For example, Texas Alliance for Life has sponsored legislation to restrict or ban abortion with "exceptions for rape, incest or fetal anomalies" while Texas Right to Life PAC "opposes abortion in all circumstances." Texas Alliance for Life PAC "has primarily allied itself with establishment incumbents, some in key leadership positions" while the more hardline Texas Right to Life PAC "has thrown its weight behind ultra-conservative newcomers." [1]

Brain death controversy

Pojman argued for continuation of artificial life support for the body of Marlise Munoz. [17] She was 14 weeks pregnant when her husband found her unconscious in November, possibly from a blood clot. Munoz subsequently died from brain death. [18] Prior to her death, Munoz had indicated that she would not like to be kept artificially alive if brain dead. [19] The fetus had suffered from oxygen deprivation and was suspected to be non-viable; the fetus's lower extremities were deformed to the extent that the gender couldn't be determined, had fluid building up inside the skull (hydrocephalus); and possibly had a heart problem. [20] [21] An attorney who had helped rewrite the Texas state law being used to keep her body on life support at John Peter Smith Hospital said that there was a problem with the application of the law to a patient that was no longer alive. [22] Her husband Eric, with the support of her family, successfully sued the hospital for withdrawing treatment. [23]

Numerous states have adopted laws restricting the ability of doctors to end artificial life support for terminally ill pregnant patients with 12 of those states (including Texas) with the most restrictive such laws, which automatically invalidate a woman’s advance directive if she is pregnant stating that, regardless of the progression of the pregnancy, a woman must remain on life sustaining treatment until she gives birth with no exception for patients who will be in prolonged severe pain or who will be physically harmed by continuing life sustaining treatment. [24] Pojman, who was also involved in the drafting of the law, said the hospital is correctly abiding by the law's goal of protecting the rights of an unborn child. [25]

Related Research Articles

United States abortion-rights movement Support for womens right to elective abortion

The United States abortion-rights movement is a sociopolitical movement in the United States supporting the view that a woman should have the legal right to an elective abortion, meaning the right to terminate her pregnancy, and is part of a broader global abortion-rights movement. The movement consists of a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body.

Libertarians promote individual liberty and seek to minimize the role of the state. The abortion debate is mainly within right-libertarianism between cultural liberals and social conservatives as left-libertarians generally see it as a non-issue as they support legal access to abortion as part of their general support for individual rights, especially in regard to what they consider to be a woman's right to control her body. Religious right and intellectual conservatives have attacked such libertarians for supporting abortion rights, especially since the demise of the Soviet Union. Libertarian conservatives claim libertarian principles such as the non-aggression principle (NAP) apply to human beings from conception and that the universal right to life applies to fetuses in the womb. Thus, some of those individuals express opposition to legal abortion.

Abortion is legal throughout the United States and its territories, although restrictions and accessibility vary from state to state. Abortion is a controversial and divisive issue in the society, culture and politics of the U.S., and various anti-abortion laws have been in force in each state since at least 1900. Since 1976, the Republican Party has generally sought to restrict abortion access or criminalize abortion, whereas the Democratic Party has generally defended access to abortion and has made contraception easier to obtain.

The abortion debate is the ongoing controversy surrounding the moral, legal, and religious status of induced abortion. In English-speaking countries, the sides involved in the debate are the self-described "pro-choice" and "pro-life" movements. Pro-choice emphasizes the woman's choice whether to terminate a pregnancy. Pro-life proposes the right of the embryo or fetus to gestate to term and be born. Both terms are considered loaded in mainstream media, where terms such as "abortion rights" or "anti-abortion" are generally preferred. Each movement has, with varying results, sought to influence public opinion and to attain legal support for its position.

Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act 2003 controversial U.S. federal law banning partial-birth abortion

The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 is a United States law prohibiting a form of late termination of pregnancy called "partial-birth abortion", referred to in medical literature as intact dilation and extraction. Under this law, any physician "who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both". The law was enacted in 2003, and in 2007 its constitutionality was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart.

<i>The Silent Scream</i> 1984 film

The Silent Scream is a 1984 anti-abortion film directed by Jack Duane Dabner, narrated by Bernard Nathanson, and produced in partnership with the National Right to Life Committee. The film depicts the abortion process via ultrasound and shows an abortion taking place in the uterus. During the abortion process, the fetus is described as appearing to make outcries of pain and discomfort. The video has been a popular tool used by the anti-abortion campaign in arguing against abortion, but it has been criticized as misleading by members of the medical community.

Abortion in the United States is legal, subject to balancing tests tying state regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy, via the landmark 1973 case of Roe v. Wade, the first abortion case to be taken to the Supreme Court. Every state has at least one abortion clinic. However, individual states can regulate and limit the use of abortion or create "trigger laws", which would make abortion illegal within the first and second trimesters if Roe were overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States. Eight states—Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, West Virginia and Wisconsin—still have unenforced pre-Roe abortion bans in their laws, which could be enforced if Roe were overturned. In accordance with the US Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), states cannot place legal restrictions posing an undue burden for "the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus."

John Peter Smith Hospital is a Level 1 Trauma Center, 573-bed county hospital located in Fort Worth, Texas that provides inpatient, outpatient and behavioral healthcare.

Stephen Broden

Stephen Edward Broden is a former Republican political candidate from the state of Texas in the 30th congressional district for the United States House of Representatives. He was defeated by Democratic incumbent Eddie Bernice Johnson. Broden is a businessman, political commentator, former professor, and an activist for anti-abortion causes.

Heartbeat bill Legislation banning abortions after the conceptus heartbeat can be detected

A heartbeat bill or fetal heartbeat bill is a form of abortion restriction legislation in the United States which makes abortions illegal as soon as the embryonic or fetal heartbeat can be detected.

Marlise Nicole Muñoz was an American woman at the center of a medical ethics controversy between November 2013 and January 2014. She suffered a suspected pulmonary embolism and was declared brain dead. Because she was pregnant, doctors at a Texas hospital kept her body on a ventilator in the intensive care unit despite the determination of brain death. Muñoz's husband entered a legal battle to have her removed from organ support. A Texas law restricts the application of advance directives in pregnant patients, but Muñoz's husband argued that the law was not applicable because his wife was legally dead. A judge ordered the hospital to remove organ support and her cardiac functions stopped on January 26, 2014.

Maternal somatic support after brain death occurs when a brain dead patient is pregnant and their body is kept alive to deliver a fetus. It occurs very rarely internationally. Even among brain dead patients, in a U.S. study of 252 brain dead patients from 1990–96, only 5 (2.8%) cases involved pregnant women between 15 and 45 years of age.

In 2015, an anti-abortion organization named the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) released several videos that had been secretly recorded. Members of the CMP posed as representatives of a biotechnology company in order to gain access to both meetings with abortion providers and abortion facilities. The videos showed how abortion providers made fetal tissue available to researchers, although no problems were found with the legality of the process. All of the videos were found to be altered, according to analysis by Fusion GPS and its co-founder Glenn R. Simpson, a former investigative reporter for The Wall Street Journal. The CMP disputed this finding, attributing the alterations to the editing out of "bathroom breaks and waiting periods." CMP had represented a longer version of the tapes as being "complete", as well as a shorter, edited version. The analysis by Fusion GPS concluded that the longer version was also edited, with skips and missing footage. Nonetheless, the videos attracted widespread media coverage; after the release of the first video, conservative lawmakers in Congress singled out Planned Parenthood and began to push bills that would strip the organization of federal family planning funding. No such attempts by Congress to cut federal family planning money from Planned Parenthood have become law. Conservative politicians in several states have also used this as an opportunity to cut or attempt to cut family planning funding at the state level.

As of September 1, 2021, abortion is prohibited in Texas once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which may be as early as 6 weeks into a woman's pregnancy, due to the Texas Heartbeat Act enacted by the Republican-controlled 87th Texas Legislature during its regular session. The Act, introduced as Senate Bill 8, was signed into law by Texas Governor Greg Abbott on May 15, 2021.

Abortion in Missouri is legal. There is one abortion clinic in Missouri. Abortion is available up to 22 weeks, and past if the woman's health is in jeopardy.

Abortion is currently available in Arkansas up to 20 weeks of gestation. But the Arkansas Unborn Child Protection Act has outlawed and criminalized abortion statewide unless the abortion is performed to save the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency. Any person who performs an abortion in violation of the Arkansas Unborn Child Protection Act, other than the pregnant woman upon whom the abortion is performed, is subject to punishment of up to 10 years imprisonment and a fine not to exceed $100,000. Any person who aids or abets an abortion in Arkansas is subject to the same punishment.

Abortion in Indiana is legal. 43% of adults said in a poll by the Pew Research Center that abortion should be legal in all or most cases. By 1950, the state legislature had tried to pass a law criminalizing women seeking or having abortions. By the early 2000s, the state had passed a law banning abortions after 22 weeks because they alleged that the fetus can feel pain. In 2007, the state had a customary informed consent provision for abortions in place. In 2018, the state legislature tried and failed to make abortion illegal in almost all cases.

Abortion in Ohio is legal until a fetal heartbeat is detectable, except in the city of Lebanon, Ohio, where abortion at all stages of pregnancy has been outlawed by local ordinance.

Abortion in Tennessee Overview of the legality and prevalence of abortions in the U.S. state of Tennessee

Abortion in Tennessee is legal.

Abortion in Iowa is legal. 52% of adults said in a poll by the Pew Research Center that abortion should be legal in all or most cases. By 2012, the state was trying to ban abortion in almost all cases on a yearly basis. 

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Brittney Martin, Anti-abortion groups' political endorsement differences show power struggle in Texas GOP, Dallas News (February 2016).
  2. 1 2 About Us: Mission Statement, Texas Alliance for Life (accessed April 8, 2017).
  3. 1 2 Brad Kennedy, Leader against abortion is under attack from the right, Fort Worth Star-Telegram (September 23, 2016).
  4. ↑ Staff reports, Founder of Texas Alliance for Life to speak to Denton Republican Women, Lewisville Reader (January 19, 2016).
  5. ↑ Lobbyists Directory, Texas Ethics Commission (search for Joseph Pojman).
  6. ↑ Shefali Luthra, Visibility Climbs for Groups on Both Sides of Abortion Debate, Texas Tribune (July 23, 2013).
  7. ↑ J. David McSwane, Texas abortion law upheld by federal court, Austin American-Statesman (June 9, 2015).
  8. ↑ Alexa Ura, U.S. Supreme Court Overturns Texas Abortion Restrictions, Texas Tribune (June 27, 2016).
  9. ↑ Alexa Ura & Aneri Pattani, Divided Anti-Abortion Groups Map New Strategies, Texas Tribune (July 7, 2016).
  10. 1 2 Patrick Svitek, Cruz's Planned Parenthood Offensive Divides Texas Anti-Abortion Forces, Texas Tribune (September 29, 2015).
  11. ↑ Nicole Chavez, Anti-abortion rally at Texas Capitol targets Planned Parenthood, Austin American-Statesman (July 28, 2015).
  12. ↑ Becca Aaronson * Audrey White, Abortion Opponents Back Fetal Pain Bill, More Physician Restrictions, Texas Tribune (November 23, 2012).
  13. 1 2 Alexa Ura, In a More Conservative Legislature, Few Anti-Abortion Bills Passed, Texas Tribune (June 2, 2015).
  14. ↑ Marissa Evans, State officials hear more testimony on fetal remains rule, Texas Tribune (November 9, 2016).
  15. ↑ Alexa Ura, Sharp Disagreements at Fetal Remains Hearing, Texas Tribune (August 4, 2016).
  16. ↑ Alexa Garcia-Ditta & Andrea Grimes, Who's the 'Life' of the Party?: Anti-abortion infighting makes for mud-slinging Texas House races in the Republican primary, Texas Observer (February 23, 2016).
  17. ↑ Kennedy, Bud (10 January 2014). "Marlise Muñoz and the politics of life and death in Tarrant County, Texas". Star Telegram. Retrieved 26 January 2014.
  18. ↑ Dart, Tom (24 January 2014). "Texas hospital acknowledges brain-dead status of pregnant woman". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
  19. ↑ Luscombe, Belinda. "Why the Dad Has No Say in Tragic Texas Brain Death Case". Time. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
  20. ↑ Bazelon, Emily. "Brain-Dead Marlise Munoz's Fetus Is "Distinctly Abnormal." Please, Texas, Let This Nightmare End". Slate.com. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
  21. ↑ "Brain-dead Tarrant woman's fetus is 'distinctly abnormal,' attorneys say". The Associated Press/ The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
  22. ↑ Max B. Baker and Elizabeth Campbell. "Texas law didn't anticipate Muñoz case, drafters say". star telegram. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
  23. ↑ "Family cries as judge rules Munoz off life support". USA Today. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
  24. ↑ Megan Greene and Leslie R. Wolfe. "REPRODUCTIVE LAWS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY PAPERS CENTER FOR WOMEN POLICY STUDIES:Pregnancy Exclusions in State Living Will and Medical Proxy Statutes" (PDF). Center for Women Policy Studies in Washington. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 January 2014. Retrieved 26 January 2014.
  25. ↑ Koppel, Nathan. "Texas Judge Orders Pregnant Woman Removed From Life Support Family Said Hospital Kept Her Alive Against Her Wishes". WSJ. Retrieved 26 January 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.