The Globalization of World Politics

Last updated

The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations (6th ed)
The Globalization of World Politics.jpg
First edition
EditorsPatricia Owens, John Baylis, Steve Smith
LanguageEnglish
GenreNonfiction
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publication date
1997
Media type Paperback, Hardback
Pages648
ISBN 978-0-19-965617-2
OCLC 174500731
327 22
LC Class JZ1242 .G58 2008

The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations is an introduction to international relations (IR) and offers comprehensive coverage of key theories and global issues.Edited by John Baylis, Patricia Owens, and Steve Smith. [1] It has eight editions, [2] first published in 1997, in this book leading scholars in the field introduce readers to the history, theory, structures, and key issues in IR, providing students with an ideal introduction and a constant guide throughout their studies. [3]

Contents

About the Author

Patricia Owens is author and professor. She is a Tutorial Fellow at Somerville College, Oxford and a professor of International Relations at University of Oxford. [4]

John Baylis is Emeritus Professor of Politics and International Relations and a former Pro Vice Chancellor at Swansea University. [5]

Steve Smith is the former Vice Chancellor of the University of Exeter and Professor of International Studies. [6] [ circular reference ]

Table of contents

Part One: International Relations In A Global Era

"Introduction" — John Baylis, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens

  • 1. "Globalization and global politics" — Anthony McGrew

Part Two: The Historical Context

  • 2. "The evolution of international society" — David Armstrong
  • 3. "International history, 1900-1999" — Len Scott
  • 4. "From the end of the cold war to the new global era" — Michael Cox
  • 5. "Rising powers and the emerging global order" — Andrew Hurrell

Part Three: Theories of World Politics

  • 6. "Realism" — Tim Dunne and Brian C. Schmidt
  • 7. "Liberalism" — Tim Dunne
  • 8. "Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism" — Steven L. Lamy
  • 9. "Marxist theories of international relations" — Stephen Hobden and Richard Wyn Jones
  • 10. "Social constructivism" — Michael Barnett
  • 11. "Post structuralism" — Lene Hansen
  • 12. "Post-colonialism" — Christine Sylvester
  • 13. "International ethics" — Richard Shapcott

Part Four: Structures & Processes

  • 14. "The changing character of war" — Mike Sheehan
  • 15. "International and global security" — John Baylis
  • 16. "International political economy in an age of globalization" — Ngaire Woods
  • 17. "Gender in world politics" — J. Ann Tickner
  • 18. "International law" — Christian Reus-Smit
  • 19. "International regimes" — Richard Little
  • 20. "The United Nations" — Paul Taylor and Devon Curtis
  • 21. "Transnational actors and international organizations in global politics" — Peter Willetts

Part Five: International Issues

  • 22. "Environmental issues" — John Vogler
  • 22. "Terrorism and globalization" — James D. Kiras
  • 23. "Nuclear proliferation" — Sheena Chestnut Greitens
  • 24. "Nationalism" — John Breuilly
  • 25. "Regionalism in international affairs" — Edward Best and Thomas Christiansen
  • 26. "Global trade and global finance" — Matthew Watson
  • 27. "Poverty, development, and hunger" — Tony Evans and Caroline Thomas
  • 28. "Human security" — Amitav Acharya
  • 29. "Human rights" — Jack Donnelly
  • 30. "Humanitarian intervention in world politics" — Alex J. Bellamy and Nicholas J. Wheeler

Part Six: Globalization in The Future

  • 31. "Globalization and the transformation of political community" — Andrew Linklater
  • 32. "Globalization and the post-cold war order" — Ian Clark

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International relations</span> Study of relationships between two or more states

International Relations (IR) are the interactions among sovereign states. The scientific study of those interactions is called international studies, international politics, or international affairs. In a broader sense, it concerns all activities among states—such as war, diplomacy, trade, and foreign policy—as well as relations with and among other international actors, such as intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs), international legal bodies, and multinational corporations (MNCs). There are several schools of thought within IR, of which the most prominent are realism, liberalism, and constructivism.

International relations theory is the study of international relations (IR) from a theoretical perspective. It seeks to explain behaviors and outcomes in international politics. The four most prominent schools of thought are realism, liberalism, constructivism, and rational choice. Whereas realism and liberalism make broad and specific predictions about international relations, constructivism and rational choice are methodological approaches that focus on certain types of social explanation for phenomena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steve Smith (political scientist)</span>

Sir Steven Murray Smith, FAcSS, FRSA, FLSW is an English international relations theorist and long serving university leader. He is the former Vice Chancellor of the University of Exeter and Professor of International Studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International security</span> Measures taken by states and international organizations to ensure mutual safety and survival

International security is a term which refers to the measures taken by states and international organizations, such as the United Nations, European Union, and others, to ensure mutual survival and safety. These measures include military action and diplomatic agreements such as treaties and conventions. International and national security are invariably linked. International security is national security or state security in the global arena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Realism (international relations)</span> Belief that world politics is always and necessarily a field of conflict among actors pursuing power

In international relations theory, realism is one of the dominant schools of thought, theoretically formalizing the statesmanship of Realpolitik of early modern Europe. Although a highly diverse body of thought, realism is unified by the belief that world politics is always and necessarily a field of conflict among actors pursuing wealth and power. The theories of realism contrast with the cooperative ideals of liberalism in international relations.

Critical international relations theory is a diverse set of schools of thought in international relations (IR) that have criticized the theoretical, meta-theoretical and/or political status quo, both in IR theory and in international politics more broadly – from positivist as well as postpositivist positions. Positivist critiques include Marxist and neo-Marxist approaches and certain ("conventional") strands of social constructivism. Postpositivist critiques include poststructuralist, postcolonial, "critical" constructivist, critical theory, neo-Gramscian, most feminist, and some English School approaches, as well as non-Weberian historical sociology, "international political sociology", "critical geopolitics", and the so-called "new materialism". All of these latter approaches differ from both realism and liberalism in their epistemological and ontological premises.

In international relations (IR), constructivism is a social theory that asserts that significant aspects of international relations are shaped by ideational factors. The most important ideational factors are those that are collectively held; these collectively held beliefs construct the interests and identities of actors.

In international relations theory, the concept of anarchy is the idea that the world lacks any supreme authority or sovereignty. In an anarchic state, there is no hierarchically superior, coercive power that can resolve disputes, enforce law, or order the system of international politics. In international relations, anarchy is widely accepted as the starting point for international relations theory.

Daniel Horace Deudney is an American political scientist and Professor of Political Science at Johns Hopkins University. His published work is mainly in the fields of international relations and political theory, with an emphasis on geopolitics and republicanism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Cox (academic)</span> British academic

Michael E. Cox is a British academic and international relations scholar. He is currently Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the London School of Economics (LSE) and Director of LSE IDEAS. He also teaches for the TRIUM Global Executive MBA Program, an alliance of NYU Stern and the London School of Economics and HEC School of Management.

Timothy J. Dunne is a British scholar of international relations, currently serving as Provost and Senior Vice-President at the University of Surrey. He is also an Emeritus Professor at the University of Queensland, where he was previously Deputy Provost and Dean of Humanities and Social Sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jennifer Sterling-Folker</span> American political scientist

Jennifer Sterling-Folker is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Connecticut. She was the Alan R. Bennett Honors Professor of Political Science. She is a specialist in International Relations theory.

Neoclassical realism is a theory of international relations and an approach to foreign policy analysis. Initially coined by Gideon Rose in a 1998 World Politics review article, it is a combination of classical realist and neorealist – particularly defensive realist – theories.

International ethics is an area of international relations theory which in one way or another concerns the extent and scope of ethical obligations between states in an era of globalization. Schools of thought include cosmopolitanism and anti-cosmopolitanism. Realism, Liberalism, and Marxism are ethical traditions that conceptually address moral issues in international relations.

In international relations theory, the Great Debates refer to a series of disagreements between international relations scholars. Ashworth describes how the discipline of international relations has been heavily influenced by historical narratives and that "no single idea has been more influential" than the notion that there was a debate between utopian and realist thinking.

Green theory is a theory of International Relations (IR). In contrast to mainstream theories of IR, it posits environmental issues as central to the study of international relations. According to green theory, mainstream theories like neorealism and neoliberalism fail to understand environmental problems through their rationalist and state-centric frameworks of analysis. Green theory focuses on the study of global justice, international development, modernization, and security. Green perspectives in IR emerged in the 1970s as a response to the increase of transnational issues related to the environment. By the end of the 20th century, green theory had established itself within the discipline. Green theory aligns itself with postpositivism that emerged from the so-called third debate of IR. The theory can be divided into an International political economy (IPE) oriented wing and a cosmopolitan wing. Initially, the IPE wing, mainly interested in environmental regimes, was stronger, but subsequently many cosmopolitan theorists, like David Held, Andrew Linklater, Henry Shue, and Thomas Pogge, have made contributions related to environmental issues.

The Orthodox Development view equates economic growth with 'development'. The gross national product of a country has continually been used by intergovernmental organisations such as the UN, to equate their economical stance to their level of 'development'. This approach to human progress has been critiqued consistently throughout its history, especially by economists such as Dambisa Moyo, with the main criticisms being that the approach is ethnocentric and one-dimensional.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Classical realism (international relations)</span> Theory of international relations

Classical realism is an international relations theory from the realist school of thought. Realism makes the following assumptions: states are the main actors in the international relations system, there is no supranational international authority, states act in their own self-interest, and states want power for self-preservation. Classical realism differs from other forms of realism in that it places specific emphasis on human nature and domestic politics as the key factor in explaining state behavior and the causes of inter-state conflict. Classical realist theory adopts a pessimistic view of human nature and argues that humans are not inherently benevolent but instead they are self-interested and act out of fear or aggression. Furthermore, it emphasizes that this human nature is reflected by states in international politics due to international anarchy.

Richard K. Ashley is a postmodernist scholar of International relations. He is an associate professor at the Arizona State University's School of Politics and Global Studies.

Patricia Owens is a London-Irish academic, author and professor. She is a Tutorial Fellow at Somerville College, Oxford and a professor of International Relations at University of Oxford. She is best known for her work on the history and theory of counterinsurgency warfare, women and the history of international thought, the history of social and political thought, and for her earlier work on war and international relations in the thought of the German-American political theorist Hannah Arendt.

References