The Human Predicament

Last updated
The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life’s Biggest Questions
The Human Predicament.jpg
Author David Benatar
Country South Africa
LanguageEnglish
Subject Philosophical pessimism
Genre Philosophy
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publication date
June 7, 2017
Pages288
ISBN 978-0190633813
OCLC 974566754

The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life's Biggest Questions is a philosophy book by David Benatar, which makes a case for philosophical pessimism, published by Oxford University Press in 2017. [1] [2] The book presents Benatar's views on a range of philosophical issues, arguing, among other topics, that having children is immoral, that death is bad despite much of human life being spent in suffering, and that suicide may be a morally justified action more often than is commonly assumed. [3] [4] The Human Predicament has been favorably compared to The Conspiracy Against the Human Race by Thomas Ligotti, the worldview presented in Ecclesiastes, and the works of philosopher Thomas Metzinger. [5] [6]

Contents

Summary

Benatar posits that there are multiple types of meaning, ranging from the cosmic to the terrestrial perspectives. Terrestrial meaning is obtainable (by having importance to family or community, for example), but there is no cosmic meaning to human existence. He argues that the world is more bad than good, but most people don't recognize it as such. Here's why: (x). One might think that if existence is of such poor quality, then death would be a good. Benatar opposes such an ideology, and argues that death is in fact bad for the following reasons: (x). He then discusses the issue of immortality, concludes that it would be a good option to be able to have in certain conditions. Not having that option is part of the human predicament. Benatar then discusses suicide, and its moral status. Benatar dismisses it as a solution to the human predicament, but holds that it may sometimes be rational, in cases where the bad of death is less horrific than the bad of continued life. Suicide is, however, always tragic, due to both its effect on others and because it involves the annihilation of an individual. Benetar then considers other possible responses to the human predicament, and defends his overall worldview.

Background

In 1997, Benatar published the paper Why It Is Better Never to Come into Existence, [7] arguing that "being brought into existence is not a benefit but always a harm," [8] and that as such, procreation is—in most situations—morally wrong. As a consequence, Benatar argued that it would be optimal for the human race to voluntarily go extinct.

Reception

Colorized version of "King Solomon in Old Age" by Gustave Dore (1866); a depiction of the purported author of Ecclesiastes, according to rabbinic tradition. Colorized King Solomon in Old Age.png
Colorized version of "King Solomon in Old Age" by Gustave Doré (1866); a depiction of the purported author of Ecclesiastes, according to rabbinic tradition.

In a review in The Philosophical Quarterly , David Matheson praised the book's analysis of the practical implications of accepting philosophical pessimism, but took issue with what he calls "the perfectionist criterion" inherent in many of Benatar's arguments for the badness of life itself:

Let ‘BADNESSm’ be shorthand for ‘things that fall on the negative side of a relevant measure m’....If the BADNESSm of a (human) life l is significantly greater than the BADNESSm of the best (human) life we can conceive of, then l is bad when judged by measure m. [3]

Matheson points out that such a criterion would not be accepted as plausible in other fields of philosophy, using aesthetics as an example: If one posits that all art which is in some way "worse" (in an aesthetic sense) than the greatest work of art conceivable is bad, then that would lead to the conclusion that all non-perfect existing artwork is aesthetically bad, which doesn't align with typical definitions of "badness". [3]

In an earlier 2017 paper The Incoherence of Soft Nihilism, [2] Matheson classifies Benatar—together with Arthur Schopenhauer, Albert Camus, and Thomas Nagel—as a proponent of what he refers to as "soft nihilism," or the belief that there is overall negative value in being alive (as compared to what Matheson calls "affirmationism," which holds the reverse), but that "it can be better, all things considered, for us to continue living in a certain way than for us to cease living altogether." [2] He contrasts this with what he calls "hard nihilism," a nihilistic position that holds death or suicide to be the (perhaps only) logical response to the human predicament. Matheson proceeds to argue that soft nihilism is incoherent, via the following argument:

  1. If soft nihilism is true, then nihilism is true.
  2. If nihilism is true, then no lives are, all things considered, better lived than not lived.
  3. If soft nihilism is true, then it can be better, all things considered, for us to continue living in a certain way than for us to cease living altogether.
  4. If it can be better, all things considered, for us to continue living in a certain way than for us to cease living altogether, then some lives are, all things considered, better lived than not lived.
  5. If soft nihilism is true, then no lives are, all things considered, better lived than not lived. (From steps 1 and 2.)
  6. If soft nihilism is true, then some lives are, all things considered, better lived than not lived. (From steps 3 and 4.)
  7. If soft nihilism is true, then no lives are, all things considered, better lived than not lived and – contradiction – some lives are, all things considered, better lived than not lived. (From steps 5 and 6.)
  8. Soft nihilism is false. (From step 7.) [2]

Andrew Spalding of the Centre for Christian Apologetics, Scholarship and Education (CASE) gave a qualified defense of Benatar's work from the perspective of Christian apologetics, noting that "a lot of what he says resonates strongly with the biblical pessimist known as Qohelet (or Ecclesiastes)," [6] in Benatar's assessment of the low quality of human life, and in his advice to use distraction as a coping mechanism. However, Spalding criticizes Benatar's anti-natalist conclusion, noting that while his logic is solid if one does not believe in God, the absurdity of his conclusions should have led him to rethink his base atheistic assumptions. [6]

Ema Sullivan-Bissett of The American Journal of Bioethics praised The Human Predicament for its "compassionate exposition of the appalling nature of our lives, extremely careful argumentation, and persuasive style." [10] At the same time, she questioned Benatar's stance on suicide on the grounds that while suicide does not fully solve the human predicament, it may resolve some issues, and "partial solutions can be appropriate" [10] as a rational response to one's predicament. She also criticized Benatar's stance that if life "feels worth continuing, then it is obviously not so burdensome as to make one prefer death, even if objectively one would be better off dead,” (188) as being self-contradictory, as Benatar also holds that "the rationality of procreation based on objective quality of the life brought into existence cannot be trumped by the perceived quality of the life created. All lives are appalling, so all lives are not worth starting (thoroughly defended in Benatar 2006). This is the case even if one knew that one’s child would subjectively evaluate her life extremely positively." [10] However, if Benatar genuinely holds the aforementioned views on suicide, "then why does Benatar think that is it not permissible to create people who would also not take their lives to be sufficiently burdensome so that they prefer death? Or even to create people who prefer that they had come into existence?" [10]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Existentialism</span> Philosophical form of enquiry into subjective existence

Existentialism is a form of philosophical inquiry that explores the issue of human existence. Existentialist philosophers explore questions related to the meaning, purpose, and value of human existence. Common concepts in existentialist thought include existential crisis, dread, and anxiety in the face of an absurd world, as well as authenticity, courage, and virtue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meaning of life</span> Philosophical and spiritual question

The meaning of life pertains to the significance of living or existence in general. Many other related questions include: "Why are we here?", "What is life all about?", or "What is the purpose of existence?" There have been many proposed answers to these questions from many different cultural and ideological backgrounds. The search for life's meaning has produced much philosophical, scientific, theological, and metaphysical speculation throughout history. Different people and cultures believe different things for the answer to this question.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nihilism</span> Philosophy antithetical to concepts of meaningfulness

Nihilism is a family of views within philosophy that rejects generally accepted or fundamental aspects of human existence, such as knowledge, morality, or meaning. The term was popularized by Ivan Turgenev and more specifically by his character Bazarov in the novel Fathers and Sons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pessimism</span> Negative mental attitude

Pessimism is a mental attitude in which an undesirable outcome is anticipated from a given situation. Pessimists tend to focus on the negatives of life in general. A common question asked to test for pessimism is "Is the glass half empty or half full?"; in this situation, a pessimist is said to see the glass as half empty, or in extreme cases completely empty, while an optimist is said to see the glass as half full. Throughout history, the pessimistic disposition has had effects on all major areas of thinking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Misanthropy</span> General dislike of humanity

Misanthropy is the general hatred, dislike, or distrust of the human species, human behavior, or human nature. A misanthrope or misanthropist is someone who holds such views or feelings. Misanthropy involves a negative evaluative attitude toward humanity that is based on humankind's flaws. Misanthropes hold that these flaws characterize all or at least the great majority of human beings. They claim that there is no easy way to rectify them short of a complete transformation of the dominant way of life. Various types of misanthropy are distinguished in the academic literature based on what attitude is involved, at whom it is directed, and how it is expressed. Either emotions or theoretical judgments can serve as the foundation of the attitude. It can be directed at all humans without exception or exclude a few idealized people. In this regard, some misanthropes condemn themselves while others consider themselves superior to everyone else. Misanthropy is sometimes associated with a destructive outlook aiming to hurt other people or an attempt to flee society. Other types of misanthropic stances include activism by trying to improve humanity, quietism in the form of resignation, and humor mocking the absurdity of the human condition.

Solipsism is the philosophical idea that only one's mind is sure to exist. As an epistemological position, solipsism holds that knowledge of anything outside one's own mind is unsure; the external world and other minds cannot be known and might not exist outside the mind.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Absurdism</span> Theory that life in general is meaningless

Absurdism is the philosophical theory that the universe is irrational and meaningless. It states that trying to find meaning leads people into a conflict with the world. This conflict can be between rational man and an irrational universe, between intention and outcome, or between subjective assessment and objective worth. But the precise definition of the term is disputed. Absurdism claims that the world as a whole is absurd. It differs in this regard from the less global thesis that some particular situations, persons, or phases in life are absurd.

Moral nihilism is the meta-ethical view that nothing is morally right or morally wrong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hegesias of Cyrene</span> Cyrenaic philosopher (active 290 BC)

Hegesias of Cyrene was a Cyrenaic philosopher. He argued that eudaimonia (happiness) is impossible to achieve, and that the goal of life should be the avoidance of pain and sorrow. Conventional values such as wealth, poverty, freedom, and slavery are all indifferent and produce no more pleasure than pain. Cicero claims that Hegesias wrote a book called ἀποκαρτερῶν, which persuaded so many people that death is more desirable than life that Hegesias was banned from teaching in Alexandria. It has been thought by some that Hegesias was influenced by Buddhist teachings.

In ethics and other branches of philosophy, suicide poses difficult questions, answered differently by various philosophers. The French Algerian essayist, novelist, and playwright Albert Camus (1913–1960) began his philosophical essay The Myth of Sisyphus with the famous line "There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide.".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glossary of philosophy</span> List of definitions of terms and concepts commonly used in philosophy

This glossary of philosophy is a list of definitions of terms and concepts relevant to philosophy and related disciplines, including logic, ethics, and theology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antinatalism</span> Moral objection to procreation

Antinatalism or anti-natalism is the philosophical position that assigns a negative value judgement to birth and views procreation as immoral. Antinatalists thus argue that humans should abstain from procreating.

Raymond Brassier is a British philosopher. He is member of the philosophy faculty at the American University of Beirut, Lebanon, known for his work in philosophical realism. He was formerly Research Fellow at the Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy at Middlesex University, London, England.

David Benatar is a South African philosopher, academic, and author. He is best known for his advocacy of antinatalism in his book Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence, in which he argues that coming into existence is serious harm, regardless of the feelings of the existing being once brought into existence, and that, as a consequence, it is always morally wrong to create more sentient beings.

Existential nihilism is the philosophical theory that life has no objective meaning or purpose. The inherent meaninglessness of life is largely explored in the philosophical school of existentialism, where one can potentially create their own subjective 'meaning' or 'purpose'. The supposed conflict between our desire for meaning and the reality of a meaningless world is explored in the philosophical school of absurdism. Of all types of nihilism, existential nihilism has received the most literary and philosophical attention.

Eugene Thacker is an American philosopher, poet, and author. He is Professor of Media Studies at The New School in New York City. His writing is often associated with the philosophy of nihilism and pessimism. Thacker's books include In the Dust of This Planet and Infinite Resignation.

<i>Better Never to Have Been</i> 2006 book by David Benatar

Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence is a 2006 book by South African philosopher David Benatar, best known for being associated with antinatalism and philosophical pessimism. The book was preceded by Benatar's 1997 paper "Why It Is Better Never to Come into Existence", where he expounded on what would eventually become the book's major concepts.

<i>The Conspiracy Against the Human Race</i> Non-fiction book by Thomas Ligotti

The Conspiracy Against the Human Race: A Contrivance of Horror is a 2010 non-fiction book by American author Thomas Ligotti. Better known as a horror fiction author, with Conspiracy Ligotti offers a series of essays exploring his philosophical pessimism and antinatalist views. Among other sources, Ligotti cites Peter Wessel Zapffe's essay "The Last Messiah" and the writings of Emil Cioran (1911–1995) and Philipp Mainländer (1841–1876) as inspirations for his philosophical outlook. The book is noted for its repeated usage of the phrase "malignantly useless," as well as for the manner "in which philosophical thought and literary analysis converge" in his writings. In 2018, the book was re-released, with a new preface.

Importance is a property of entities that matter or make a difference. For example, World War II was an important event and Albert Einstein was an important person because of how they affected the world. There are disagreements in the academic literature about what type of difference is required. According to the causal impact view, something is important if it has a big causal impact on the world. This view is rejected by various theorists, who insist that an additional aspect is required: that the impact in question makes a value difference. This is often understood in terms of how the important thing affects the well-being of people. So in this view, World War II was important, not just because it brought about many wide-ranging changes but because these changes had severe negative impacts on the well-being of the people involved. The difference in question is usually understood counterfactually as the contrast between how the world is and how the world would have been without the existence of the important entity. It is often argued that importance claims are context- or domain-dependent. This means that they either explicitly or implicitly assume a certain domain in relation to which something matters. For example, studying for an exam is important in the context of academic success but not in the context of world history. Importance comes in degrees: to be important usually means to matter more within the domain in question than most of the other entities within this domain.

Philosophical pessimism is a family of philosophical views that assign a negative value to life or existence. Philosophical pessimists commonly argue that the world contains an empirical prevalence of pains over pleasures, that existence is ontologically or metaphysically adverse to living beings, and that life is fundamentally meaningless or without purpose. Their responses to this condition, however, are widely varied and can be life-affirming.

References

  1. Benatar, David (June 7, 2017). The human predicament : a candid guide to life's biggest questions. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-063381-3. OCLC   974566754.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Matheson, David (2017). "The Incoherence of Soft Nihilism". Think . 16 (47): 127–135. doi:10.1017/S1477175617000252. ISSN   1477-1756. S2CID   172109061.
  3. 1 2 3 Matheson, David (2018-07-01). "The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life's Biggest Questions". The Philosophical Quarterly. 68 (272): 639–641. doi: 10.1093/pq/pqx045 . ISSN   0031-8094 . Retrieved July 6, 2021.
  4. James, Rachel M.; Shackelford, Todd K. (March 2018). "The Harms of Existence: A Review of David Benatar, The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life's Biggest Questions". Evolutionary Psychological Science. 4 (3): 347–349. doi:10.1007/s40806-018-0146-8. ISSN   2198-9885. S2CID   158563884 . Retrieved July 6, 2021.
  5. Rothman, Joshua (November 27, 2017). "The Case for Not Being Born". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2021-07-07.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  6. 1 2 3 Spalding, Andrew (November 23, 2017). "Book Review: The Human Predicament". CASE. Retrieved 2021-07-07.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  7. Benatar, David (1997). "Why It Is Better Never to Come into Existence". American Philosophical Quarterly. 34 (3): 345–355. ISSN   0003-0481. JSTOR   20009904.
  8. Benatar 1997, p. 345.
  9. Brown, William P. (2000). Ecclesiastes. Louisville, Ky.: John Knox Press. p. 11. ISBN   0-585-33826-4. OCLC   45885583.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Sullivan-Bissett, Ema (2018-07-03). "Review of David Benatar, The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life's Biggest Questions". The American Journal of Bioethics. 18 (7): W4–W6. doi:10.1080/15265161.2018.1478019. ISSN   1526-5161. PMID   30040549. S2CID   51716650 . Retrieved July 6, 2021.