The Missing Billionaires

Last updated

The Missing Billionaires: A Guide to Better Financial Decisions is a 2023 book by James White and Victor Haghani. Haghani was a founding partner of Long-Term Capital Management.

Vladimir V. Piterbarg wrote "the authors convincingly argue that the Expected Utility framework is the right one for decision making for the bulk of financial decisions." [1] A review in The Economist wrote "The authors' great success is in offering a consistent and explicit framework within which to do all this. At its core is the concept of 'expected utility'". [2] However, a review in The Economic Times of India wrote that the book is simply an argument for diversification: "That's all there is to it." [3]

Synopsis

The introduction questions why there are so few US billionaires descended from historical wealthy people. If historical wealthy families had invested the money in the US stock market and spent at reasonable rates, even accounting for family growth, there would be many "old money" billionaires today, but there are not. The authors suggest this is because of "taking too much or too little risk, spending more than their wealth could support, and not adjusting their spending as their wealth fluctuated". Even in a good investment environment (the US stock market over the 20th century), these wealthy people performed poorly. The authors suggest sizing of investments is crucial. Renaissance Technologies were only successful with their bets 50.75% of the time, [4] but were able to generate enormous returns by sizing their bets appropriately.

The authors describe an experiment they made. Subjects were given the opportunity to bet on a biased coin, which came up Heads 60% of the time. Starting with a $25 bankroll, they were given 30 minutes to try to achieve a pay-out capped at $250. Despite these favourable conditions, one third of the participants finished with less money than they started with, and 28% went bust. The correct strategy is a Kelly bet or a fraction thereof. The Kelly criterion suggests betting 20% of bankroll each time, adjusting the amount of each bet as the player's bankroll goes up and down. Assuming a player can make 300 bets in 30 minutes, betting 20% or 10% of bankroll both have a 94% probability of reaching the cap. A risk averse person will bet some fraction of the full Kelly bet. In this example, betting 10% of bankroll gets most of the expected return for only half the risk.

The authors argue that people should not try to maximise expected wealth. Rather, one should maximise expected utility. The authors recommend the use of surveys to quantify an individual's risk aversion.

The authors advocate dynamic portfolio management using CAPE to estimate the yield on equities, and allocating a portion of a portfolio to inflation protected bonds such as US TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities). On historical data, this strategy outperformed a 100% allocation to equities, with lower risk.

The authors point out that, due to economic growth, a person whose spending power increased only with inflation would feel a reduction in welfare. They suggest using inflation + 1.5% as a benchmark to calculate excess returns.

Returns must increase with the square of risk. A quadrupling of return is required to compensate for a doubling of risk. Money managers must produce outsize returns to justify their greater fees and risk.

A retired person who spends a fixed dollar amount of their wealth each year is quite likely to go bust, whereas a person who spends a fixed percentage of their wealth each year cannot go bust. Such a person must be willing to reduce their spending 90% if the stock market declines 90%. "If you cannot abide changing your total spending, including gifts, as your wealth changes through time, then it is inconsistent for you to take investment risk in your portfolio."

For retired individuals who want to ensure a level of income until their death, the authors recommend buying an annuity, assuming it is reasonably priced, because "bearing one's own longevity risk does not offer compensation in the form of a risk premium". They can then give their remaining wealth to their children or to charity, avoiding inheritance tax. For an endowment, or a family managing generational wealth, the authors suggest an endowment which spends 2.4% of its wealth each year is unlikely to decline in value over time, and will maximise its expected utility.

Investing a large portion of your wealth in one company is unlikely to be sensible. Similarly, an entrepreneur raising money for their company may be wise to raise more money and give up a larger portion of equity, reducing their expected return but potentially increasing their expected utility.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Risk aversion</span> Economics theory

In economics and finance, risk aversion is the tendency of people to prefer outcomes with low uncertainty to those outcomes with high uncertainty, even if the average outcome of the latter is equal to or higher in monetary value than the more certain outcome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Personal finance</span> Budgeting and expenses

Personal finance is the financial management that an individual or a family unit performs to budget, save, and spend monetary resources in a controlled manner, taking into account various financial risks and future life events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">St. Petersburg paradox</span> Paradox involving a game with repeated coin flipping

The St. Petersburg paradox or St. Petersburg lottery is a paradox involving the game of flipping a coin where the expected payoff of the lottery game is infinite but nevertheless seems to be worth only a very small amount to the participants. The St. Petersburg paradox is a situation where a naïve decision criterion that takes only the expected value into account predicts a course of action that presumably no actual person would be willing to take. Several resolutions to the paradox have been proposed, including the impossible amount of money a casino would need to continue the game indefinitely.

The expected utility hypothesis is a foundational assumption in mathematical economics concerning decision making under uncertainty. It postulates that rational agents maximize utility, meaning the subjective desirability of their actions. Rational choice theory, a cornerstone of microeconomics, builds this postulate to model aggregate social behaviour.

In finance, the Sharpe ratio measures the performance of an investment such as a security or portfolio compared to a risk-free asset, after adjusting for its risk. It is defined as the difference between the returns of the investment and the risk-free return, divided by the standard deviation of the investment returns. It represents the additional amount of return that an investor receives per unit of increase in risk.

Equity risk is "the financial risk involved in holding equity in a particular investment." Equity risk is a type of market risk that applies to investing in shares. The market price of stocks fluctuates all the time, depending on supply and demand. The risk of losing money due to a reduction in the market price of shares is known as equity risk.

Investment management is the professional asset management of various securities, including shareholdings, bonds, and other assets, such as real estate, to meet specified investment goals for the benefit of investors. Investors may be institutions, such as insurance companies, pension funds, corporations, charities, educational establishments, or private investors, either directly via investment contracts/mandates or via collective investment schemes like mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, or Real estate investment trusts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GIC (sovereign wealth fund)</span> Singaporean sovereign wealth fund

GIC Private Limited is a Singaporean sovereign wealth fund that manages the country's foreign reserves. Established by the Government of Singapore in 1981 as the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation, from which the acronym "GIC" is derived, its mission is to preserve and enhance the international purchasing power of the reserves, with the aim to achieve good long-term returns above global inflation over the investment time horizon of 20 years.

In finance, an investment strategy is a set of rules, behaviors or procedures, designed to guide an investor's selection of an investment portfolio. Individuals have different profit objectives, and their individual skills make different tactics and strategies appropriate. Some choices involve a tradeoff between risk and return. Most investors fall somewhere in between, accepting some risk for the expectation of higher returns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asset allocation</span> Investment strategy

Asset allocation is the implementation of an investment strategy that attempts to balance risk versus reward by adjusting the percentage of each asset in an investment portfolio according to the investor's risk tolerance, goals and investment time frame. The focus is on the characteristics of the overall portfolio. Such a strategy contrasts with an approach that focuses on individual assets.

In finance, an asset class is a group of marketable financial assets that have similar financial characteristics and behave similarly in the marketplace. We can often break these instruments into those having to do with real assets and those having to do with financial assets. Often, assets within the same asset class are subject to the same laws and regulations; however, this is not always true. For instance, futures on an asset are often considered part of the same asset class as the underlying instrument but are subject to different regulations than the underlying instrument.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kelly criterion</span> Bet sizing formula for long-term growth

In probability theory, the Kelly criterion is a formula for sizing a sequence of bets by maximizing the long-term expected value of the logarithm of wealth, which is equivalent to maximizing the long-term expected geometric growth rate. John Larry Kelly Jr., a researcher at Bell Labs, described the criterion in 1956.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alternative investment</span> Investments other than stocks, bonds and cash

An alternative investment, also known as an alternative asset or alternative investment fund (AIF), is an investment in any asset class excluding capital stocks, bonds, and cash.

Asset location (AL) is a term used in personal finance to refer to how investors distribute their investments across savings vehicles including taxable accounts, tax-exempt accounts, tax-deferred accounts, trust accounts, variable life insurance policies, foundations, and onshore vs. offshore accounts.

Goals-Based Investing or Goal-Driven Investing is the use of financial markets to fund goals within a specified period of time. Traditional portfolio construction balances expected portfolio variance with return and uses a risk aversion metric to select the optimal mix of investments. By contrast, GBI optimizes an investment mix to minimize the probability of failing to achieve a minimum wealth level within a set period of time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Investment fund</span> Way of investing money alongside other investors

An investment fund is a way of investing money alongside other investors in order to benefit from the inherent advantages of working as part of a group such as reducing the risks of the investment by a significant percentage. These advantages include an ability to:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government Pension Investment Fund</span> Administrative agency in Japan

Government Pension Investment Fund, or GPIF, is an incorporated administrative agency, established by the Japanese government. It is the largest pool of retirement savings in the world. Japan's GPIF is the largest public fund investor in Japan by assets and is a major proponent of the Stewardship Principles.

Intertemporal portfolio choice is the process of allocating one's investable wealth to various assets, especially financial assets, repeatedly over time, in such a way as to optimize some criterion. The set of asset proportions at any time defines a portfolio. Since the returns on almost all assets are not fully predictable, the criterion has to take financial risk into account. Typically the criterion is the expected value of some concave function of the value of the portfolio after a certain number of time periods—that is, the expected utility of final wealth. Alternatively, it may be a function of the various levels of goods and services consumption that are attained by withdrawing some funds from the portfolio after each time period.

Philippe J.S. De Brouwer is a European investment and banking professional as well as academician in finance and investing. As a scientist he is mostly known for his solution to the Fallacy of Large Numbers and his formulation of the Maslowian Portfolio Theory in the field of investment advice.

Ergodicity economics is a research programme aimed at reworking the theoretical foundations of economics around the concept of ergodicity. The programme's main goal is to understand how traditional economic theory, framed in terms of the expectation values, changes when replacing expectation value with time averages. In particular, the programme is interested in understanding the effect of non-ergodic processes in economics, that is processes where the expectation value of an observable does not equal its time average.

References

  1. Piterbarg, Vladimir V. (3 October 2023). "Book review: The Missing Billionaires: A Guide to Better Financial Decisions, by Victor Haghani and James White, Wiley (2023). Hardback. ISBN 978-1119747918". Quantitative Finance. 23 (10): 1395–1396. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2023.2205452 . ISSN   1469-7688.
  2. "How to avoid a common investment mistake". The Economist.
  3. Kumar, Dhirendra (9 October 2023). "Don't be a missing billionaire: Know how to diversify investments to grow your money". The Economic Times. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
  4. https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/2bswymr8cih3jeaslxc00/portfolio/famed-medallion-fund-stretches-explanation-to-the-limit-professor-claims