This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations .(April 2009) |

**Time-bin encoding** is a technique used in quantum information science to encode a qubit of information on a photon. Quantum information science makes use of qubits as a basic resource similar to bits in classical computing. Qubits are any two-level quantum mechanical system; there are many different physical implementations of qubits, one of which is time-bin encoding.

While the time-bin encoding technique is very robust against decoherence, it does not allow easy interaction between the different qubits. As such, it is much more useful in quantum communication (such as quantum teleportation and quantum key distribution) than in quantum computation.

Time-bin encoding is done by having a single-photon go through a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZ), shown in black here. The photon coming from the left is guided through one of two paths (shown in blue and red); the guiding can be made by optical fiber or simply in free space using mirrors and polarising cubes. One of the two paths is longer than the other. The difference in path length must be longer than the coherence length of the photon to make sure the path taken can be unambiguously distinguished. The interferometer has to keep a stable phase, which means that the path length difference must vary by much less than the wavelength of light during the experiment. This usually requires active temperature stabilization.

If the photon takes the short path, it is said to be in the state ; if it takes the long path, it is said to be in the state . If the photon has a non-zero probability to take either path, then it is in a coherent superposition of the two states:

These coherent superpositions of the two possible states are called qubits and are the basic ingredient of Quantum information science.

In general, it is easy to vary the phase gained by the photon between the two paths, for example by stretching the fiber, while it is much more difficult to vary the amplitudes which are therefore fixed, typically at 50%. The created qubit is then

which covers only a subset of all possible qubits.

Measurement in the basis is done by measuring the time of arrival of the photon. Measurement in other bases can be achieved by letting the photon go through a second MZ before measurement, though, similar to the state preparation, the possible measurement setups are restricted to only a small subset of possible qubit measurements.

Time-bin qubits do not suffer from depolarization or polarization mode-dispersion, making them better suited to fiber optics applications than polarization encoding. Photon loss is easily detectable since the absence of photons does not correspond to an allowed state, making it better suited than a photon-number based encoding.

**Quantum teleportation** is a technique for transferring quantum information from a sender at one location to a receiver some distance away. While teleportation is commonly portrayed in science fiction as a means to transfer physical objects from one location to the next, quantum teleportation only transfers quantum information. The sender does not have to know the particular quantum state being transferred. Moreover, the location of the recipient can be unknown, but to complete the quantum teleportation, classical information needs to be sent from sender to receiver. Because classical information needs to be sent, quantum teleportation cannot occur faster than the speed of light.

**Quantum entanglement** is the phenomenon that occurs when a group of particles are generated, interact, or share spatial proximity in a way such that the quantum state of each particle of the group cannot be described independently of the state of the others, including when the particles are separated by a large distance. The topic of quantum entanglement is at the heart of the disparity between classical and quantum physics: entanglement is a primary feature of quantum mechanics not present in classical mechanics.

In physics, a **squeezed coherent state** is a quantum state that is usually described by two non-commuting observables having continuous spectra of eigenvalues. Examples are position and momentum of a particle, and the (dimension-less) electric field in the amplitude and in the mode of a light wave. The product of the standard deviations of two such operators obeys the uncertainty principle:

A **Bell test**, also known as **Bell inequality test** or **Bell experiment**, is a real-world physics experiment designed to test the theory of quantum mechanics in relation to Albert Einstein's concept of local realism. Named for John Stewart Bell, the experiments test whether or not the real world satisfies local realism, which requires the presence of some additional local variables to explain the behavior of particles like photons and electrons. To date, all Bell tests have found that the hypothesis of local hidden variables is inconsistent with the way that physical systems behave.

**Quantum error correction** (**QEC**) is used in quantum computing to protect quantum information from errors due to decoherence and other quantum noise. Quantum error correction is theorised as essential to achieve fault tolerant quantum computing that can reduce the effects of noise on stored quantum information, faulty quantum gates, faulty quantum preparation, and faulty measurements. This would allow algorithms of greater circuit depth.

A **trapped ion quantum computer** is one proposed approach to a large-scale quantum computer. Ions, or charged atomic particles, can be confined and suspended in free space using electromagnetic fields. Qubits are stored in stable electronic states of each ion, and quantum information can be transferred through the collective quantized motion of the ions in a shared trap. Lasers are applied to induce coupling between the qubit states or coupling between the internal qubit states and the external motional states.

**Quantum networks** form an important element of quantum computing and quantum communication systems. Quantum networks facilitate the transmission of information in the form of quantum bits, also called qubits, between physically separated quantum processors. A quantum processor is a small quantum computer being able to perform quantum logic gates on a certain number of qubits. Quantum networks work in a similar way to classical networks. The main difference is that quantum networking, like quantum computing, is better at solving certain problems, such as modeling quantum systems.

**BB84** is a quantum key distribution scheme developed by Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard in 1984. It is the first quantum cryptography protocol. The protocol is provably secure, relying on two conditions: (1) the quantum property that information gain is only possible at the expense of disturbing the signal if the two states one is trying to distinguish are not orthogonal ; and (2) the existence of an authenticated public classical channel. It is usually explained as a method of securely communicating a private key from one party to another for use in one-time pad encryption.

In quantum optics, a **NOON state** or **N00N state** is a quantum-mechanical many-body entangled state:

**Quantum cloning** is a process that takes an arbitrary, unknown quantum state and makes an exact copy without altering the original state in any way. Quantum cloning is forbidden by the laws of quantum mechanics as shown by the no cloning theorem, which states that there is no operation for cloning any arbitrary state perfectly. In Dirac notation, the process of quantum cloning is described by:

The **one-way** or **measurement-based quantum computer** (**MBQC**) is a method of quantum computing that first prepares an entangled *resource state*, usually a cluster state or graph state, then performs single qubit measurements on it. It is "one-way" because the resource state is destroyed by the measurements.

In quantum information and quantum computing, a **cluster state** is a type of highly entangled state of multiple qubits. Cluster states are generated in lattices of qubits with Ising type interactions. A cluster *C* is a connected subset of a *d*-dimensional lattice, and a cluster state is a pure state of the qubits located on *C*. They are different from other types of entangled states such as GHZ states or W states in that it is more difficult to eliminate quantum entanglement in the case of cluster states. Another way of thinking of cluster states is as a particular instance of graph states, where the underlying graph is a connected subset of a *d*-dimensional lattice. Cluster states are especially useful in the context of the one-way quantum computer. For a comprehensible introduction to the topic see.

**SARG04** is a 2004 quantum cryptography protocol derived from the first protocol of that kind, BB84.

**Quantum cryptography** is the science of exploiting quantum mechanical properties to perform cryptographic tasks. The best known example of quantum cryptography is quantum key distribution which offers an information-theoretically secure solution to the key exchange problem. The advantage of quantum cryptography lies in the fact that it allows the completion of various cryptographic tasks that are proven or conjectured to be impossible using only classical communication. For example, it is impossible to copy data encoded in a quantum state. If one attempts to read the encoded data, the quantum state will be changed due to wave function collapse. This could be used to detect eavesdropping in quantum key distribution (QKD).

In quantum mechanics, the **cat state**, named after Schrödinger's cat, is a quantum state composed of two diametrically opposed conditions *at the same time*, such as the possibilities that a cat is alive and dead at the same time.

**Linear optical quantum computing** or **linear optics quantum computation** (**LOQC**) is a paradigm of quantum computation, allowing universal quantum computation. LOQC uses photons as information carriers, mainly uses linear optical elements, or optical instruments to process quantum information, and uses photon detectors and quantum memories to detect and store quantum information.

**Nicolas Gisin** is a Swiss physicist and professor at the University of Geneva working on the foundations of quantum mechanics, quantum information and communication. His work includes both experimental and theoretical physics. He has contributed work in the fields of experimental quantum cryptography and long distance quantum communication over standard telecom optical fibers. He also has co-founded ID Quantique, a company that provides quantum-based technologies.

The **six-state protocol (SSP)** is the quantum cryptography protocol that is the version of BB84 that uses a six-state polarization scheme on three orthogonal bases.

The **KLM scheme** or **KLM protocol** is an implementation of linear optical quantum computing (LOQC), developed in 2000 by Emanuel Knill, Raymond Laflamme and Gerard J. Milburn. This protocol makes it possible to create universal quantum computers solely with linear optical tools. The KLM protocol uses linear optical elements, single-photon sources and photon detectors as resources to construct a quantum computation scheme involving only ancilla resources, quantum teleportations and error corrections.

**Magic state distillation** is a method for creating more accurate quantum states from multiple noisy ones, which is important for building fault tolerant quantum computers. It has also been linked to quantum contextuality, a concept thought to contribute to quantum computers' power.

- Marcikic, I.; De Riedmatten, H.; Tittel, W.; Scarani, V.; Zbinden, H.; Gisin, N. (2002). "Time-bin entangled qubits for quantum communication created by femtosecond pulses".
*Physical Review A*.**66**(6): 062308. arXiv: quant-ph/0205144 . Bibcode:2002PhRvA..66f2308M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.66.062308. S2CID 118932433. - Donohue, John M.; Agnew, Megan; Lavoie, Jonathan; Resch, Kevin J. (2013). "Coherent Ultrafast Measurement of Time-Bin Encoded Photons".
*Physical Review Letters*.**111**(15): 153602. arXiv: 1306.1250 . Bibcode:2013PhRvL.111o3602D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.153602. PMID 24160599. S2CID 42286193. - Martin, A.; Kaiser, F.; Vernier, A.; Beveratos, A.; Scarani, V.; Tanzilli, S. (2013). "Cross time-bin photonic entanglement for quantum key distribution".
*Physical Review A*.**87**(2): 020301. arXiv: 1207.6586 . Bibcode:2013PhRvA..87b0301M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.87.020301. S2CID 11312035. - Marcikic, I.; De Riedmatten, H.; Tittel, W.; Zbinden, H.; Legré, M.; Gisin, N. (2004). "Distribution of Time-Bin Entangled Qubits over 50 km of Optical Fiber".
*Physical Review Letters*.**93**(18): 180502. arXiv: quant-ph/0404124 . Bibcode:2004PhRvL..93r0502M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.180502. PMID 15525142. S2CID 13120600. - Pittman, Todd (2013). "It's a Good Time for Time-Bin Qubits".
*Physics*.**6**: 110. Bibcode:2013PhyOJ...6..110P. doi: 10.1103/Physics.6.110 . hdl: 11603/19318 . - Gündoǧan, Mustafa; Ledingham, Patrick M.; Kutluer, Kutlu; Mazzera, Margherita; De Riedmatten, Hugues (2015). "Solid State Spin-Wave Quantum Memory for Time-Bin Qubits".
*Physical Review Letters*.**114**(23): 230501. arXiv: 1501.03980 . Bibcode:2015PhRvL.114w0501G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.230501. PMID 26196784. S2CID 17555337.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.