| Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising | |
|---|---|
| |
| Enacted | March 2024 |
| Commenced | Autumn 2025 (most provisions) |
| Status: In force | |
Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising refers to Regulation (EU) 2024/900, a European Union law adopted in March 2024 that introduces harmonised rules for transparency and targeting in political advertising across all EU member states. [1]
The regulation complements the Digital Services Act, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation. It responds to increasing concerns about the influence of microtargeting in elections, especially by third-country actors. [1]
The regulation broadly defines political advertising to include the preparation, placement, promotion, delivery, or dissemination of messages that are:
Covered actors include political parties, campaign organisations, elected officials, and issue-based groups. Even civil society campaigns are affected if they relate to political or legislative outcomes. [1]
The regulation introduces the following core obligations:
A central EU repository for online political advertising will include metadata standards, authentication protocols, APIs for third-party access, and allow stakeholders (e.g. journalists, researchers, civil society) to request machine-readable data from providers under Article 17.
Google announced its exit from the EU political ad market in late 2024, highlighting the regulation’s broad scope and lack of reliable electoral data. [3]
Meta Platforms announced that it will suspend all political and issue-based ads on its platforms in the EU from October 2025, citing "legal uncertainty" and "operational challenges". [4]
Critics argue the regulation risks conflating civil society with political parties, placing excessive burdens on NGOs, grassroots campaigns, and issue-driven communication. Groups have warned this may chill speech on topics like abortion or domestic violence when connected to legislative processes. [3]
Observers have flagged issues including, overly broad definitions of “political advertising”, lack of technical guidance ahead of enforcement, disproportionate impacts on small and medium enterprises, risk of democratic distortion due to reliance on dominant platforms like Meta. [3]