Related Research Articles
The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) is the statute establishing federal U.S. drug policy under which the manufacture, importation, possession, use, and distribution of certain substances is regulated. It was passed by the 91st United States Congress as Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 and signed into law by President Richard Nixon. The Act also served as the national implementing legislation for the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.
In the law of the United States, the Code of Laws of the United States of America is the official compilation and codification of the general and permanent federal statutes. It contains 53 titles. The main edition is published every six years by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives, and cumulative supplements are published annually. The official version of these laws appears in the United States Statutes at Large, a chronological, uncodified compilation.
The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) is a United States labor law requiring covered employers to provide employees with job-protected, unpaid leave for qualified medical and family reasons. The FMLA was a major part of President Bill Clinton's first-term domestic agenda, and he signed it into law on February 5, 1993. The FMLA is administered by the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor.
In the United States, the removal of cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act is a proposed legal and administrative change in cannabis-related law at the federal level. It has been proposed repeatedly since 1972. The category is the most tightly restricted category reserved for drugs that have "no currently accepted medical use.”
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC), formally the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, is the domestic portion of federal statutory tax law in the United States, published in various volumes of the United States Statutes at Large, and separately as Title 26 of the United States Code (USC). It is organized topically, into subtitles and sections, covering income tax in the United States, payroll taxes, estate taxes, gift taxes, and excise taxes; as well as procedure and administration. The Code's implementing federal agency is the Internal Revenue Service.
The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. 91–513, 84 Stat. 1236, enacted October 27, 1970, is a United States federal law that, with subsequent modifications, requires the pharmaceutical industry to maintain physical security and strict record keeping for certain types of drugs. Controlled substances are divided into five schedules on the basis of their potential for abuse, accepted medical use, and accepted safety under medical supervision. Substances in Schedule I have a high potential for abuse, no accredited medical use, and a lack of accepted safety. From Schedules II to V, substances decrease in potential for abuse. The schedule a substance is placed in determines how it must be controlled. Prescriptions for drugs in all schedules must bear the physician's federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) license number, but some drugs in Schedule V do not require a prescription. State schedules may vary from federal schedules.
Fair debt collection broadly refers to regulation of the United States debt collection industry at both the federal and state level. At the Federal level, it is primarily governed by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). In addition, many U.S. states also have debt collection laws that regulate the credit and collection industry and give consumer debtors protection from abusive and deceptive practices. Many state laws track the language of the FDCPA, so that they are sometimes referred to as mini-FDCPAs.
Title 21 is the portion of the Code of Federal Regulations that governs food and drugs within the United States for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP).
The drug policy in the United States is the activity of the federal government relating to the regulation of drugs. Starting in the early 1900s the United States government began enforcing drug policies. These policies criminalized drugs such as opium, morphine, heroine, and cocaine outside of medical use. The drug policies put into place are enforced by the Food and Drug Administration and the Drug Enforcement Administration. Classification of Drugs are defined and enforced using the Controlled Substance Act, which lists different drugs into their respective substances based on its potential of abuse and potential for medical use. Four different categories of drugs are Alcohol, Cannabis, Opioids, and Stimulants.
The alcohol laws of Missouri are among the most permissive in the United States. Missouri is known throughout the Midwest for its largely laissez-faire approach to alcohol regulation, in sharp contrast to the very strict alcohol laws of some of its neighbors, like Kansas and Oklahoma.
Drug policy of California refers to the policy on various classes and kinds of drugs in the U.S. state of California. Cannabis possession has been legalized with the Adult Use of Marijuana Act, passed in November 2016, with recreational sales starting January of the next year. With respect to many controlled substances, terms such as illegal and prohibited do not include their authorized possession or sale as laid out by applicable laws.
Cousin marriage laws in the United States vary considerably from one state to another, ranging from cousin marriages being legal in some to being a criminal offense in others. However, even in the states where it is legal, the practice is not widespread.
In the United States, the law for murder varies by jurisdiction. In many US jurisdictions there is a hierarchy of acts, known collectively as homicide, of which first-degree murder and felony murder are the most serious, followed by second-degree murder and, in a few states, third-degree murder, followed by voluntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter which are not as serious, followed by reckless homicide and negligent homicide which are the least serious, and ending finally in justifiable homicide, which is not a crime. However, because there are at least 52 relevant jurisdictions, each with its own criminal code, this is a considerable simplification.
State v. Elliott, 616 A.2d 210, is a decision of the Vermont Supreme Court holding that all aboriginal title in Vermont was extinguished "by the increasing weight of history." The Vermont Supreme Court has clarified that its holding in Elliott applies to the entire state.
The Crimes Act of 1790, formally titled An Act for the Punishment of Certain Crimes Against the United States, defined some of the first federal crimes in the United States and expanded on the criminal procedure provisions of the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Crimes Act was a "comprehensive statute defining an impressive variety of federal crimes".
The Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act is a series of federal marijuana decriminalization bills that have been introduced multiple times in the United States Congress.
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) currently consists of the following articles:
Article 13 of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, guarantees a prohibition against banishment and the right to freedom of movement.
Two main questions arise in the law surrounding driving after having ingested cannabis: (1) whether cannabis actually impairs driving ability, and (2) whether the common practice of testing for THC is a reliable means to measure impairment. On the first question, studies are mixed. Several recent, extensive studies–including one conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and one conducted by the American Automobile Association (AAA)–show that drivers with detectable THC in their blood are no more likely to cause car crashes than drivers with no amount of THC in their blood. Others show that cannabis can impair certain abilities important to safe driving –but no studies have been able to show that this increases the actual risk of crashing, or that drivers with THC in their blood cause a disproportionate number of crashes. On the second question, the studies that have been conducted so far have consistently found that THC blood levels and degree of impairment are not closely related. No known relationship between blood levels of THC and increased relative crash risk, or THC blood levels and level of driving impairment, has been shown by single-crash or classic-control studies. Thus, even though it is possible that cannabis impairs driving ability to some extent, there are currently no reliable means to test or measure whether a driver was actually impaired.
A constituency statute is a term in US corporate law for a rule that requires a board of directors to pay regard to the interests of all corporate stakeholders in their decision making. A constituency statute is intended to give directors of corporations the discretion to balance the interests of stakeholders, rather than have to solely focus on maximizing shareholder value in a way that could damage the long-term sustainability of the enterprise.
References
- 1 2 The 1970 Act: Don't Sit There, Amend Something
- ↑ Ala. Code §§ 20–2–1 to 20–2–93 (1975) Alaska Stat. §§ 11.71.010 to 11.71.900, 17.30.010 to 17.30.900 (1962) Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 36–2501 to 36–2553 (1956) Ark.Stat.Ann. §§ 5–64–101 to 5–64–906 Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 11000 to 11651 (1975) Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 12–22–301 to 12–22–322 (1985) Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. §§ 21a–240 to 21a–308 (1987) Del. Code Ann. tit. 16, §§ 4701 to 4796 (1983) D.C. Code Ann. §§ 33–501, to 33–567 (1981) Fla.Stat.Ann. §§ 893.1–893.15 (1976) Ga. Code Ann. §§ 16–13–20 to 16–13–56 Haw.Rev.Stat. §§ 329–1 to 329–58 (1985) Idaho Code §§ 37–2701 to 37–2751 (1977) Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 56 ½, ¶ 1100 to 1603 (Smith–Hurd 1985) Ind. Code Ann. §§ 35–48–1–1 to 35–48–4–14 (Burns 1985) Iowa Code Ann. §§ 204.101 to 204.602 (1987) Kan.Stat.Ann. §§ 65–4101 to 65–4140 (1985) Ky.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 218A.010 to 218A.990 (Michie 1982) La.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 40:961 to 40:995 (1977) Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 17–A §§ 1101 to 1116, tit. 22, §§ 2361 to 2387 (1983) Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. Ch. 94C, §§ 1 to 48 (1985) Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. §§ 333.7101 to 333.7545 (1980) Minn.Stat.Ann §§ 152.01 to 152.20 (1988) Miss. Code Ann. §§ 41–29–101 to 41–29–185 (1972) Mo.Rev.Stat. §§ 195.010 to 195.320 (1968) Mont.Code Ann. §§ 50–32–101 to 50–32–405 (1987) Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 28–401 to 28–445 (1943) Nev.Rev.Stat. §§ 453.011 to 453.361 (1986) N.J.Stat.Ann §§ 24:21–1 to 24:21–53 (1988) N.M.Stat.Ann. §§ 30–31–1 to 30–31–41 (1978) N.Y.Pub.Health §§ 3300–3396 (1987) N.C.Gen.Stat. §§ 90–86 to 90–113.8 (1987) N.D.Cent.Code §§ 19–03.1–01 to 19–03.1–43 (1981) Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §§ 3719.01 to 3719.99 (1980) Oka.Stat.Ann. tit. 63 §§ 2–101 to 2–610 (1984) Or.Rev.Stat. §§ 475.005 to 475.285, 475.992 to 475.995 (1987) Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 35, §§ 780–101 to 780–144 (1977) R.I.Gen.Laws §§ 21–28–1.01 to 21–28–6.02 (1956) S.C. Code Ann. §§ 44–53–110 to 44–53–590 (1976) S.D. Codified Laws Ann. §§ 34–20B–1 to 34–20B–114 (1986) Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39–6–401 to 39–6–419, 53–11–301 to 53–11–414 (1983) Tex. Code Ann. §§ 4476–15 (Vernon 1976) Utah Code Ann. §§ 58–37–1 to 58–37–19 (1953) Va. Code Ann. §§ 54–524.1 et seq. (1950) Wash.Rev.Code §§ 69.50–101 to 69.50–607 (1985) W.Va. Code §§ 60A–1–101 to 60A–6–605 (1984) Wis.Stat.Ann. §§ 161.001 to 161.62 (1986) Wyo.Stat. §§ 35–7–1001 to 35–7–1057 (1977).
 | This United States federal legislation article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |