Universal Jobmatch

Last updated

Universal Jobmatch was a British website for finding job vacancies. The site was developed in a collaboration between the Department for Work and Pensions and Monster. [1]

Contents

History

The concept

The website replaced the JobCentre Plus' Job Search Tool and Employer Services Direct, which were part of the Directgov online system set up in the UK's New Deal employment system. The service has been introduced as part of a Government campaign to assist the DWP to monitor client's jobsearch activities directly, and as part of the "Digital By Default" agenda to migrate more British citizens to subscribe to an online process when claiming both unemployed and in-work benefits. [2] The service was switched prematurely live through an AlphaTesting System in November 2012, was commended as being a perfect system by Secretary of State for Work and Pensions George Iain Duncan Smith in November 2012,[ citation needed ] but remains a work in progress. Whereas, in parallel to the switching of Universal Jobmatch, the DWP closed its existing processes supporting Job Search and Employer Services Direct, migrating its customers to the new system, and reported that 460,000 employers posting jobs and the site receiving over 6 million searches per day. By February 2013 there were some 2 million registered users., [3] although ambiguity remains with these figures. When Universal Jobmatch was introduced, the DWP migrated existing users of its Employer Services Direct service to Universal Jobmatch, thereby inflating the database of registered users.

Development

However, from the outset of the Alpha Testing System being promoted as being live in November 2012, whereas Universal Jobmatch may generate a number of job leads, and whereas each Job Lead may require candidates to apply for a job through an external website, there is no guarantee that, upon visiting the web site, the Job Lead will still exist. Indeed, some jobs advertised on Universal Jobmatch result in multiple clicks and multiple tabs as they initially open a job aggregating website which links to a recruitment agency website which then links to an employers website and the application made is not recorded in the Universal Job Match necessitating the user to have to manually type in a report of their application. The Monster Corporation (which operates the system on behalf of the Department of Works and Pensions) makes it clear when candidates sign up to the system that "they do not accept liability or responsibility for any financial consequences".[ citation needed ]

Early teething problems

Early controversy has arisen due to people having registered with Universal Jobmatch and then finding that they are targeted by dubious organisations and individuals in financial scams. [4] Channel 4 news ran a feature, in December 2012, which explained how this new government service was being used to obtain personal details of jobseekers. [5] Instead of resolving this issue, the Monster Corporation which operates the system on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) require all users, when creating an account, to accept a number of terms and conditions of use, [6] including the clause that they "don't accept liability for loss or damage incurred by users of the website.

The Universal Jobmatch states regularly as of January 2013 that users must "Never ever give out things like scanned passports, national insurance numbers or bank account details until a job offer has officially been made." on their relevant web pages. [7] [8] [9] [10] The site was also made a lot more user-friendly and less verbose in mid 2013. [4]

Tender Controversy

On 12 February 2014, it was revealed in a Freedom of Information Act request [11] that Monster didn't win the Universal Jobmatch Tender falling into last place on value and second to last place on evaluation scoring; [12] until the service was put back out to tender. [13]

The Government paid Methods Consulting Limited and Jobsite UK (Worldwide) Limited £950,000 compensation, [14] who should have won both tenders, when the new contract was awarded. To date, the Government hasn't specified its reason for placing the contract back out to tender but the fact it paid compensation seems to suggest it wasn't the private company at fault.

Concerns are raised how Monsters "satisfactory" evaluation score and high bid in the first tender, resulted in a near-perfect evaluation score in the second tender and a bid of under half the original which in turn made them competitive. Allegations of insider dealing and corruption has been made because of this. [12]

Mooted demise

According to a report in The Guardian in March 2014, leaked documents from the DWP indicate that the government had formulated plans to scrap Universal Jobmatch when the contract for the site was up for renewal in 2016, due to the numbers of fake and repeat job adverts posted to the site and because of cost concerns. [15]

Replacement

On 26 April 2018 a message was placed on the home page saying the service would be replaced by 'Find a job' on 14 May 2018. [16] Users were advised to save their information by 17 June 2018 as logins would not be moved to the new system. [17] [16]

Who can use it and why

It was not a requirement to register, and anonymous searches could be made by people looking for jobs and applications made directly to companies that had posted their contact details. However, as of 1 March 2013 JobCentre Plus advisers could, if giving a good reason, require Jobseeker's Allowance claimants to use the site through a JobSeeker Direction. If they refused to comply, they could be recommended for a benefit sanction. A decision-maker took the final decision over whether benefit should be removed, which as a consequence of the UK Governments Welfare Reform Bill of 2012, may have led to a loss in State Benefits for up to 3 years. [8] [18] [19]

Registered users had the option to allow the DWP to have access to their account to allow the department to monitor their activity. Whilst this was not mandatory, claimants were threatened with a sanction for not doing so. [20]

Hacktivists

Additionally, hacktivists have created an plug-in addition for the Chrome Browser which will allow the automatic distribution of CVs to any recruiters through Universal Jobmatch. [21]

Related Research Articles

Unemployment benefits, also called unemployment insurance, unemployment payment, unemployment compensation, or simply unemployment, are payments made by authorized bodies to unemployed people. In the United States, benefits are funded by a compulsory governmental insurance system, not taxes on individual citizens. Depending on the jurisdiction and the status of the person, those sums may be small, covering only basic needs, or may compensate the lost time proportionally to the previous earned salary.

The New Deal was a workfare programme introduced in the United Kingdom by the first New Labour government in 1998, initially funded by a one-off £5 billion windfall tax on privatised utility companies. The stated purpose was to reduce unemployment by providing training, subsidised employment and voluntary work to the unemployed. Spending on the New Deal was £1.3 billion in 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Department for Work and Pensions</span> Ministerial department of the UK Government

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is a United Kingdom government department of His Majesty's Government responsible for welfare, pensions and child maintenance policy. As the UK's biggest public service department it administers the State Pension and a range of working age, disability and ill health benefits to around 20 million claimants and customers. It is the second largest governmental department in terms of employees, and the largest in terms of expenditure (£187bn).

Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) is an unemployment benefit paid by the Government of the United Kingdom to people who are unemployed and actively seeking work. It is part of the social security benefits system and is intended to cover living expenses while the claimant is out of work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jobcentre Plus</span> Brand used by the Department for Work and Pensions in the UK

Jobcentre Plus is a brand used by the Department for Work and Pensions in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Directgov</span>

Directgov was the British government's digital service for people in the United Kingdom, which from 2004 provided a single point of access to public sector information and services. The site's portal was replaced by the new GOV.UK website on 17 October 2012, although migration of all services to GOV.UK branding took several years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Workforce Australia</span> Australian government unemployment service

Workforce Australia is an Australian Government-funded network of organisations that are contracted by the Australian Government, through the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR), to deliver employment services to unemployed job seekers on Government income support payments and employers.

Social security, in Australia, refers to a system of social welfare payments provided by Australian Government to eligible Australian citizens, permanent residents, and limited international visitors. These payments are almost always administered by Centrelink, a program of Services Australia. In Australia, most payments are means tested.

Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) is a United Kingdom welfare payment for adults younger than the State Pension age who are having difficulty finding work because of their long-term medical condition or a disability. It is a basic income-replacement benefit paid in lieu of wages. It is currently being phased out and replaced with Universal Credit for claimants on low incomes, although the contribution-based element remains available.

Incapacity Benefit was a British social security benefit that was paid to people facing extra barriers to work because of their long-term illness or their disability. It replaced Invalidity Benefit in 1995. The government began to phase out Incapacity Benefit in 2008 by making it unavailable to new claimants, and later moved almost all the remaining long-term recipients onto Employment and Support Allowance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">A4e</span> For-profit welfare-to-work company based in the United Kingdom

A4e was a for-profit, welfare-to-work company based in the United Kingdom. The company began in Sheffield in 1991 with the objective to provide redundant steelworkers with the training required to obtain new jobs.

Universal Credit is a United Kingdom social security payment. It is means-tested and is replacing and combining six benefits for working-age households with a low income: income-related Employment and Support Allowance, income-based Jobseeker's Allowance, and Income Support; Child Tax Credit and Working Tax Credit; and Housing Benefit. An award of UC is made up of different elements, which become payable to the claimant if relevant criteria apply: a standard allowance for singles or couples, child elements and disabled child elements for children in the household, housing cost element, childcare costs element, as well as elements for being a carer or having an illness or disability and therefore having limited capability to work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AfterCollege</span>

AfterCollege is an online service that connects job-seeking college students and alumni with employers who want to hire them through faculty and career networks at colleges and universities in the U.S. The service uses a patented matching process to deliver jobs to jobseekers, basing matches in part on a user's academic affiliation and field of study. Recruitology is a division of AfterCollege created in 2016, serving media companies and employers.

<i>R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions</i>

R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] UKSC 68 is a United Kingdom constitutional law and labour law case that found the conduct of the Department for Work and Pensions "workfare" policy was unlawful. Caitlin Reilly, an unemployed geology graduate, and Jamieson Wilson, an unemployed driver, challenged the Jobcentre policy of making the unemployed work for private companies to get unemployment income. The outcome of the case affects over 3,000 claimants and entails around £130m unpaid benefits.

Mandatory Work Activity (MWA) was a workfare programme in the United Kingdom whereby individuals had to work for their benefits or risk being "sanctioned" and losing them. MWA started in May 2011, but in November 2015 the DWP confirmed it was "not renewing" it. An academic analysis by the Department of Work and Pensions cast doubt on the effectiveness of MWA, and despite finding "little evidence" that workfare improved claimants gaining paid employment, the DWP ignored the findings of the study, and in June 2012, the scheme received a £5m expansion. A similar but little-known scheme "Jobseeker Mandatory Activity" (JMA) was piloted by New Labour in 2006, but did not last beyond 2008. JMA targeted those claimants 25 and over, who had been unemployed for 6 months or more and made claimants liable to "sanction" for non-compliance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Workfare in the United Kingdom</span> System of welfare regulations

Workfare in the United Kingdom is a system of welfare regulations put into effect by UK governments at various times. Individuals subject to workfare must undertake work in return for their welfare benefit payments or risk losing them. Workfare policies are politically controversial. Supporters claim that such policies help people move off welfare and into employment whereas critics argue that they are analogous to slavery or indentured servitude and counterproductive in decreasing unemployment.

The Work Programme (WP) was a UK government welfare-to-work programme introduced in Great Britain in June 2011. It was the flagship welfare-to-work scheme of the 2010–2015 UK coalition government. Under the Work Programme the task of getting the long-term unemployed into work was outsourced to a range of public sector, private sector and third sector organisations. The scheme replaced a range of schemes which existed under previous New Labour governments including Employment Zones, New Deal, Flexible New Deal and the now abolished Future Jobs Fund scheme which aimed to tackle youth unemployment. Despite being the flagship welfare-to-work scheme of the Conservative-led coalition government, and then the incumbent Conservative government from May 2015, the DWP announced, in November 2015, that it was replacing the Work Programme and Work Choice with a new Work and Health Programme for the longer-term unemployed and those with health conditions. The DWP also announced that it would not be renewing Mandatory Work Activity and Help to Work which included Community Work Placements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welfare Reform Act 2012</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Welfare Reform Act 2012 is an Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom which makes changes to the rules concerning a number of benefits offered within the British social security system. It was enacted by the Parliament of the United Kingdom on 8 March 2012.

Community Work Placements were a UK Government workfare scheme under which unemployed claimants had to work for up to 26 weeks/30 hours in order to continue to receive Jobseekers Allowance The policy has been criticized by a number of organizations. Community Work Placements (CWPs) were launched at the start of 2014, but it was announced in November 2015, that the DWP was "not renewing" them.

Disability in the United Kingdom covers a wide range of conditions and experiences, deeply impacting the lives of millions of people. Defined by the Equality Act 2010 as a physical or mental impairment with a substantial and long-term adverse effect on a person's ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities, it encompasses various aspects of life, including demographics, legislation, healthcare, employment, and culture. Despite numerous advancements in policy and social attitudes, individuals with disabilities often encounter unique challenges and disparities.

References

  1. "Joint letter from Neil Couling (Head of Jobcentre Plus, DWP) and Sal Iannuzzi (CEO, Monster)".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  2. "DWP's Digital Strategy" (PDF). gov.uk. December 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. "Universal Jobmatch service getting '6 million searches daily'". Chartered Management Institute. Archived from the original on 2 November 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  4. 1 2 "Universal Jobmatch: How On Earth Can It Work?". Ipswich Unemployed Action. 15 November 2012. Archived from the original on 6 November 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  5. "Universal Jobmatch Alternative - We Respect Your Privacy". Universal Jobmatch Plus. Archived from the original on 27 September 2015.
  6. "Universal Jobmatch jobs and skills search -". direct.gov.uk.
  7. "JobSeeker's Allowance (JSA)". www.gov.uk.
  8. 1 2 "JobSeeker's Allowance (JSA)". www.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 11 October 2015.
  9. "Safer Jobs". safer-jobs.com. Archived from the original on 6 November 2015.
  10. "Universal Jobmatch jobs and skills search - Help". direct.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 29 January 2018.
  11. "Universal Jobmatch procurement (first tender)". whatdotheyknow.com. Archived from the original on 21 February 2014.
  12. 1 2 "Universal Jobmatch – Tender Scam - Ipswich Unemployed Action". Ipswich Unemployed Action. Archived from the original on 3 March 2014.
  13. "Universal Jobmatch procurement (first tender) - a Freedom of Information request to Department for Work and Pensions" (PDF). 19 March 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016.
  14. "Contact (for personal messages only, not advice or guidance)". refuted.org.uk. Archived from the original on 17 February 2014.
  15. Malik, Shiv (16 March 2014). "DWP draws up plans to ditch ridiculed jobs website". theguardian.com . Archived from the original on 19 March 2014. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
  16. 1 2 "Universal Jobmatch (homepage)". Universal Jobmatch. Archived from the original on 11 May 2018. Retrieved 11 May 2018. Universal Jobmatch will be replaced by the Find a job service on 14 May 2018. Important: If you have an existing Universal Jobmatch account it will not move to the new service. Save any information you want to keep, like your CV, cover letters and application history by 17 June 2018.
  17. "Adzuna Wins Contract for Universal Jobmatch service – Blog". www.adzuna.co.uk.
  18. "JobSeekers required to use Universal Jobmatch". Department for Work and Pensions. 4 March 2013. Archived from the original on 11 April 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  19. "Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) - GOV.UK". Archived from the original on 11 October 2015. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  20. "Log on or stop signing on, Iain Duncan Smith says in warning to job seekers". Metro (British newspaper) . 20 December 2012. Archived from the original on 6 November 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  21. Alex Hern. "Jobseekers' site spammed with CVs by activists". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 September 2016.
  1. https://www.gov.uk/jobseekers-allowance
  2. https://www.gov.uk/jobsearch
  3. https://jobsearch.direct.gov.uk/Home.aspx