Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham

Last updated August 01, 2025

It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:

This page isn't very useful as it stands, with no context nor sources that can be checked to learn more. I couldn't find any information on Google either. (proposed by 7804j )

If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it .

The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for seven days, i.e., after 15:11, 7 August 2025 (UTC).

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy.
Find sources: "Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page . (Learn how and when to remove these messages)

This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article by providing more context for the reader.(June 2023) ( Learn how and when to remove this message )

This article needs additional citations for verification . Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2023) ( Learn how and when to remove this message )

This article relies largely or entirely on a single source . Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2023)

( Learn how and when to remove this message )

Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham

Court	High Court of New Zealand
Court membership
Judge sitting	Wild J

Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the common law remedy of rectification.^[1]

References

↑ Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006). An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. p. ^{[ page needed ]}. ISBN 0-86472-555-8.

This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.