Zwickler v. Koota

Last updated

Zwickler v. Koota
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided December 5, 1967
Full case nameZwickler v. Koota
Citations389 U.S. 241 ( more )
Holding
A federal court cannot use the abstention doctrine to avoid a constitutional issue merely because it determines that the plaintiff is unlikely to receive the relief they requested.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black  · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II  · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart  · Byron White
Abe Fortas  · Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
MajorityBrennan
ConcurrenceHarlan

Zwickler v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a federal court cannot use the abstention doctrine to avoid a constitutional issue merely because it determines that the plaintiff is unlikely to receive the relief they requested. [1] The underlying case was about an anonymous handbill law that the Court believed was overbroad. [2]

References

  1. Zwickler v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241 (1967)
  2. Lieberman, Jethro K. (1999). "Overbreadth Doctrine". A Practical Companion to the Constitution. p. 338.