1420

Last updated

Millennium: 2nd millennium
Centuries:
Decades:
Years:
1420 in various calendars
Gregorian calendar 1420
MCDXX
Ab urbe condita 2173
Armenian calendar 869
ԹՎ ՊԿԹ
Assyrian calendar 6170
Balinese saka calendar 1341–1342
Bengali calendar 827
Berber calendar 2370
English Regnal year 7  Hen. 5   8  Hen. 5
Buddhist calendar 1964
Burmese calendar 782
Byzantine calendar 6928–6929
Chinese calendar 己亥年 (Earth  Pig)
4116 or 4056
     to 
庚子年 (Metal  Rat)
4117 or 4057
Coptic calendar 1136–1137
Discordian calendar 2586
Ethiopian calendar 1412–1413
Hebrew calendar 5180–5181
Hindu calendars
 - Vikram Samvat 1476–1477
 - Shaka Samvat 1341–1342
 - Kali Yuga 4520–4521
Holocene calendar 11420
Igbo calendar 420–421
Iranian calendar 798–799
Islamic calendar 822–823
Japanese calendar Ōei 27
(応永27年)
Javanese calendar 1334–1335
Julian calendar 1420
MCDXX
Korean calendar 3753
Minguo calendar 492 before ROC
民前492年
Nanakshahi calendar −48
Thai solar calendar 1962–1963
Tibetan calendar 阴土猪年
(female Earth-Pig)
1546 or 1165 or 393
     to 
阳金鼠年
(male Iron-Rat)
1547 or 1166 or 394

Year 1420 ( MCDXX ) was a leap year starting on Monday (link will display the full calendar) of the Julian calendar.

Contents

Events

JanuaryDecember

Date unknown

Births

Deaths

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">15th century</span>

The 15th century was the century which spans the Julian dates from 1 January 1401 to 31 December 1500 (MD).

Year 1403 (MCDIII) was a common year starting on Monday of the Julian calendar.

Year 1421 (MCDXXI) was a common year starting on Wednesday of the Julian calendar.

The 1380s was a decade of the Julian Calendar which began on January 1, 1380, and ended on December 31, 1389.

The 1360s was a decade of the Julian Calendar which began on January 1, 1360, and ended on December 31, 1369.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1394</span> Calendar year

Year 1394 (MCCCXCIV) was a common year starting on Thursday of the Julian calendar.

The 1420s decade ran from January 1, 1420, to December 31, 1429.

The 1410s decade ran from January 1, 1410, to December 31, 1419.

The 1390s was a decade of the Julian Calendar which began on January 1, 1390, and ended on December 31, 1399.

The 1370s was a decade of the Julian Calendar which began on January 1, 1370, and ended on December 31, 1379.

Year 1377 (MCCCLXXVII) was a common year starting on Thursday of the Julian calendar.

Year 1407 (MCDVII) was a common year starting on Saturday of the Julian calendar.

Year 1408 (MCDVIII) was a leap year starting on Sunday of the Julian calendar.

Year 1411 (MCDXI) was a common year starting on Thursday of the Julian calendar.

Year 1414 (MCDXIV) was a common year starting on Monday of the Julian calendar.

Year 1419 (MCDXIX) was a common year starting on Sunday of the Julian calendar.

Year 1443 (MCDXLIII) was a common year starting on Tuesday of the Julian calendar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yongle Emperor</span> 3rd emperor of the Ming dynasty (r. 1402–1424)

The Yongle Emperor, personal name Zhu Di, was the third emperor of the Ming dynasty, reigning from 1402 to 1424.

The 1400s ran from January 1, 1400, to December 31, 1409.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ming–Tibet relations</span> Relations between Ming-dynasty China and Tibet

The Ming dynasty considered Tibet to be part of the Western Regions. While the Ming dynasty at its height had some degree of influence in Tibet, the exact nature of their relations is under dispute by modern scholars. Analysis of the relationship is further complicated by modern political conflicts and the application of Westphalian sovereignty to a time when the concept did not exist. The Historical Status of China's Tibet, a book published by the People's Republic of China, asserts that the Ming dynasty had unquestioned sovereignty over Tibet by pointing to the Ming court's issuing of various titles to Tibetan leaders, Tibetans' full acceptance of the titles, and a renewal process for successors of these titles that involved traveling to the Ming capital. Scholars in China also argue that Tibet has been an integral part of China since the 13th century and so it was a part of the Ming Empire. However, most scholars outside China, such as Turrell V. Wylie, Melvin C. Goldstein, and Helmut Hoffman, say that the relationship was one of suzerainty, Ming titles were only nominal, Tibet remained an independent region outside Ming control, and it simply paid tribute until the Jiajing Emperor, who ceased relations with Tibet.

References

  1. Arthur Hassall (1919). France, Mediaeval and Modern: A History. Clarendon Press. p. 64. ISBN   978-0-598-86435-2.
  2. Keith Dockray (2004). Henry V. Tempus. p. 185. ISBN   978-0-7524-3046-1.
  3. Guzmán, L. (February 14, 2019). "Encuentran registros de megaterremoto ocurrido hace seis siglos en el norte de Chile". El Mercurio (in Spanish). Santiago, Chile. Retrieved June 8, 2019.
  4. Manuel Abad, Tatiana Izquierdo, Miguel Cáceres, Enrique Bernárdez and Joaquín Rodríguez-Vidal (2018). Coastal boulder deposit as evidence of an ocean-wide prehistoric tsunami originated on the Atacama Desert coast (northern Chile). Sedimentology. Publication: december, 13th, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12570
  5. Lily Xiao Hong Lee, Sue Wiles: Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Women, Volume II: Tang Through Ming 618 - 1644
  6. The Encyclopedia Americana. Grolier Incorporated. 1999. p. 516. ISBN   978-0-7172-0131-0.
  7. Anne Commire (October 8, 1999). Women in World History. Gale. p. 361. ISBN   978-0-7876-4061-3.
  8. Iris Lilian Whitman (1927). Longfellow and Spain. Lancaster Press Incorporated. p. 214.
  9. Dek, A.W.E. (1970). Genealogie van het Vorstenhuis Nassau (in Dutch). Zaltbommel: Europese Bibliotheek. p. 66.
  10. James Grant Wilson (1876). From Thomas the Rhymer to Richard Gall. Harper & brothers. p. 8.
  11. Henrik Birnbaum; Michael S. Flier (1984). California Slavic Studies. University of California Press. p. 60. ISBN   978-0-520-08638-8.