2011 Wisconsin Act 23

Last updated

The 2011 Wisconsin Act 23 established a requirement for nearly all voters to present approved photo identification to cast a ballot. It was one of many new voter ID laws in the United States. Act 23 was developed by Republican Governor Scott Walker and the Republican controlled Wisconsin Legislature during a walkout by Democratic lawmakers as part of the 2011 Wisconsin protests.

Contents

Approved forms of identification

Section 1 of Act 23 specifies that only the following forms of photo identification are acceptable: [1]

Implementation

In July 2011, the Associated Press reported that the Scott Walker administration was planning to close some DMV locations that could issue identification under the voter ID law and increase the hours that other DMVs were available. The changes were made to comply with a requirement that every county have a DMV location open at least 20 hours per week. A Democratic legislator said that the closures would occur in primarily Democratic areas, while the expansions would occur in primarily Republican areas. [3] Two weeks later, the plan was replaced with a plan to maintain all existing DMV offices and create four new ones. [4]

In July 2011, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) sent an internal memo instructing employees that an applicant for an ID card must pay the $28 fee unless the applicant requests that the ID be issued for free. [5] In September 2011, the DMV began posting signs instructing applicants seeking free "ID cards used for voting" to check the appropriate box on the application form. [6]

As initially implemented, an applicant for an identification card was required to present a birth certificate. The Division of Motor Vehicles maintains form MV3002, which allows identification cards to be issued without a birth certificate. The form is not mentioned in publicly available materials published by the DMV, and a high-ranking DMV official was unfamiliar with the form. [7] In September 2014, a procedure was implemented where applicants could supply birth information that would be verified with the State Vital Records Office for free. [8] [9]

On December 13, 2011, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed the lawsuit Frank v. Walker in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin seeking to block the Act as a violation of the U.S. Constitution. [10] In April 2014, U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman in Milwaukee issued a permanent injunction against the Act, ruling that the Act was unconstitutional as well as a violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. [11] Adelman said that it was not shown that voters without acceptable identification could obtain it under the Act and that the state failed to show evidence of recent voter impersonation fraud. [12] Adelman's ruling marked that first time that a voter ID law had been found to violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Adelman found a violation of Section 2 on the basis of racial minorities not only being more likely to lack acceptable identification, but also facing additional barriers to acquiring acceptable identification. [13]

In a separate litigation, on July 31, 2014, the Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the Act by giving the Wisconsin Department of Motor Vehicles discretion to waive fees, over dissent by Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson, and Justices N. Patrick Crooks and Ann Walsh Bradley. [14] [15]

The state appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and asked for a stay of Judge Adelman's injunction. [16] On September 12, 2014, the same day oral arguments were held, a Seventh Circuit panel stayed Adelman's injunction, allowing the Act to immediately take effect, and Wisconsin officials announced plans to implement the Act for the November 2014 election. [17] Judge Frank H. Easterbrook was joined by Judges Diane S. Sykes and John Daniel Tinder. [18] On October 10, an equally divided circuit voted 5–5 to deny rehearing en banc, over written dissent by Judge Richard Posner. [14] [19]

On October 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated the stay imposed by the Seventh Circuit, and thus temporarily barred the state from implementing the voter id law, due to the proximity of the upcoming general election and the fact that absentee ballots were sent out without any notation that proof of photo identification must be submitted, over written dissent by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [20] [21] [22] [23]

On March 23, 2015, the Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs' petition for a writ of certiorari . [24]

On October 19, 2015, Judge Adelman, entered the order denying the injunction. However, on April 12, 2016, the Seventh Circuit reversed and remanded, with Judge Easterbrook finding the plaintiffs could now challenge the law as it had been applied individually. [14] [25] On July 19, Judge Adelman found that the state was applying the Act unconstitutionally, ordering the state to allow anyone who makes an affidavit of their eligibility to vote in the November general election. [26]

On July 29, 2016, in a separate trial in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in Madison, U.S. District Judge James D. Peterson also found the Act was applied unconstitutionally but ordering more limited oversight. [27] On August 10, 2016, the Seventh Circuit stayed Judge Adelman's injunction, leaving in place Judge Peterson's order. [28]

Judge Peterson held a new hearing after reading news reports in The Nation magazine that the state was ignoring his order. [29] [30] On October 13, 2016, Judge Peterson entered an order expanding his oversight but still not permitting voters to swear eligibility by affidavit. [29] The United States presidential election in Wisconsin, 2016 was held on November 8. After a long appellate process, Judge Peterson's ruling was reversed by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in June 2020. [31]

Related Research Articles

Scott Walker (politician) 45th Governor of Wisconsin

Scott Kevin Walker is an American politician who served as the 45th Governor of Wisconsin from 2011 to 2019. He is a member of the Republican Party.

Real ID Act 2005 US federal law

The Real ID Act of 2005 is an Act of Congress that modifies U.S. federal law pertaining to security, authentication, and issuance procedure standards for drivers' licenses and identity documents, as well as various immigration issues pertaining to terrorism.

Diane S. Sykes American judge

Diane Schwerm Sykes is an American jurist and lawyer who serves as the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. She served as a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court from 1999 to 2004.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Highest court in the U.S. state of Wisconsin

The Wisconsin Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in Wisconsin. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over original actions, appeals from lower courts, and regulation or administration of the practice of law in Wisconsin.

Voter registration in the United States Requirement for most elections in the United States of America

Voter registration in the United States is required for voting in federal, state and local elections in the United States. The only exception is North Dakota, although cities in North Dakota may register voters for city elections. Voter registration takes place at the county level in many states and at the municipal level in several states. Most states set cutoff dates for voter registration and to update details, ranging from 2 to 4 weeks before an election; while a third of states have Election Day or "same-day" voter registration which enables eligible citizens to register or update their registration when they vote before or on election day.

Brennan Center for Justice

The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a nonprofit law and public policy institute. The organization is named after Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan Jr. Generally considered liberal, the Brennan Center advocates for a number of progressive public policy positions, including raising the minimum wage, opposing voter ID laws, and calling for public funding of elections. The organization opposed the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. FEC, which held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent political expenditures by nonprofits.

Same-sex marriage in Wisconsin has been legally recognized since October 6, 2014, upon the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage. On October 6, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of an appellate court ruling in Wolf v. Walker that had found Wisconsin's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. The appellate court issued its order prohibiting enforcement of the state's ban on same-sex marriage the next day and Wisconsin counties began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples immediately. Wisconsin had previously recognized domestic partnerships, which afforded limited legal rights to same-sex couples, from August 2009 until they were discontinued in April 2018.

Rudolph Thomas Randa was an American judge. He was a United States district judge in the Eastern District of Wisconsin for the last 24 years of his life. He was Chief Judge of the Eastern District of Wisconsin from 2002 until October 2009. Prior to his appointment to the federal court, he was a Wisconsin Circuit Court Judge and served one year on the Wisconsin Court of Appeals.

Lynn Adelman American lawyer, judge and politician

Lynn S. Adelman is an American lawyer, judge, and former politician. He has served as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, since December 1997. Earlier in his career, he served 20 years in the Wisconsin State Senate, representing southwest Milwaukee County and neighboring municipalities.

<i>Appling v. Walker</i>

Appling v. Walker was a state court lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of Wisconsin's domestic partnership registry. The action began as a petition for original action before the Wisconsin Supreme Court asking the Court for a declaration that the registry is unconstitutional and for a permanent injunction against the registry, which began registering couples on August 3, 2009. On November 4, 2009, the Court declined to take the case. Petitioners then refiled in state circuit court and the court ruled in June 2011 that the registry is constitutional. That decision was affirmed by a state appeals court in December 2012, and by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in July 2014.

John Theodore Chisholm is an American prosecutor and politician who has served as Milwaukee County District Attorney since 2007. A career prosecutor, Chisholm specialized in complex conspiracy prosecutions before his election as district attorney in 2006.

2012 Wisconsin gubernatorial recall election 2012 attempt to remove Governor Scott Walker from office

The 2012 Wisconsin gubernatorial recall election was a special election to elect the governor and lieutenant governor of Wisconsin. It resulted in voters re-electing incumbent Republican governor Scott Walker over the Democratic candidate Tom Barrett by a larger margin than he had in 2010, in which Walker had also faced Barrett. Recall organizers opposed Walker's agenda, particularly his limiting of collective bargaining rights for state employees and they collected over 900,000 signatures to initiate the recall election process. There was also a recall for Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Kleefisch. She won her race, defeating Democrat Mahlon Mitchell, making her the first lieutenant governor to run in and survive a recall.

Voter identification laws in the United States Laws regarding the IDs that are required for voting in the US

Voter ID laws in the United States are laws that require a person to provide some form of official identification before they are permitted to register to vote, receive a ballot for an election, or to actually vote in elections in the United States.

Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and Section 4(b), which contains the coverage formula that determines which jurisdictions are subject to preclearance based on their histories of discrimination in voting.

Voter suppression in the United States is various legal and illegal efforts to prevent eligible voters from exercising their right to vote. Where found, such voter suppression efforts vary by state, local government, precinct, and election. Voter suppression has historically been used for racial, economic, gender, age and disability discrimination. Before and during the American Civil War, most African-Americans had not been able to vote. After the Civil War, all African-Americans were granted voting rights, causing some Southern Democrats and former Confederate states to institute actions such as poll taxes or language tests that were ostensibly not in contradiction to the U.S. Constitution at the time, but were used to limit and suppress voting access, most notably African American communities that made up large proportions of the population in those areas, but in many regions the majority of the electorate as a whole was functionally or officially unable to register to vote or unable to cast a ballot. African Americans' access to registration and voting in the South was often difficult until the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and continues to be a subject of debate. American women did not have a constitutionally protected right to vote until the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920, while Native Americans' right to vote was not enacted fully until 1924 with the Indian Citizenship Act. Until 1971, with the passage of the Twenty-sixth Amendment, the minimum voting age in the United states was 21, not 18. A constitutional amendment improving voting accessibility for the elderly and handicapped was passed in 1984. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, as of March 24, 2021, more than 361 bills that would restrict voting access have been introduced in 47 states.

<i>Wolf v. Walker</i>

Wolf v. Walker is a federal lawsuit filed in February 2014 that challenged Wisconsin's refusal to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples, its refusal to recognize same-sex marriages established in other jurisdictions, and related statutes. In June 2014, Judge Barbara Crabb of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin ruled for the plaintiffs. And in the week before she stayed her decision county clerks in 60 of the state's 72 counties issued marriage licenses to same-sex couples and some performed marriage ceremonies for them. The state appealed her decision to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed her opinion in a unanimous decision on September 4. The state requested a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court, which was denied on October 6. Same-sex marriages resumed after the Seventh Circuit issued its mandate the next day.

2018 Wisconsin elections 2018 U.S. midterm elections in Wisconsin

The 2018 Wisconsin Fall General Election was held in the U.S. state of Wisconsin on November 6, 2018. All of Wisconsin's partisan executive and administrative offices were up for election as well as one of Wisconsin's U.S. Senate seats, Wisconsin's eight seats in the United States House of Representatives, seventeen seats in the Wisconsin State Senate, and all 99 seats in the Wisconsin State Assembly. The 2018 Wisconsin Fall Partisan Primary was held August 14, 2018. There were also special elections held during 2018 for three State Assembly seats and two State Senate seats.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL) is a nonprofit conservative law firm based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The group was founded by lawyer Rick Esenberg in 2011.

Matthew Alejandro Barreto is a political scientist. and co-founder of the national polling and research firm Barreto Segura Partners Research.

Paul V. Malloy is the presiding circuit court judge for Ozaukee County, Wisconsin.

References

  1. [ full citation needed ]
  2. Stein, Jason (27 December 2011). "Your new photo IDs will arrive via mail". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel . Retrieved 31 July 2016.
  3. "Wis. DMV says closure decisions aren't final". Associated Press. 2011-07-22. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
  4. Roller, Emma (2011-08-04). "State puts brakes on plan to close DMV sites". Journal Sentinel. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
  5. Venegren, Jessica; Doherty, Shawn (2011-09-07). "Top DOT official tells staff not to mention free voter ID cards to the public — unless they ask". Capital Times. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
  6. Marley, Patrick (2011-09-07). "DMV employees told not to volunteer information on free IDs". Journal Sentinel. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
  7. Vielmetti, Bruce (2013-12-24). "Legal filings hone arguments over Wisconsin voter ID law". Journal Sentinel.
  8. Henzl, Ann-Elise (2014-09-15). "Voter ID: No Birth Certificate Needed to Apply for Wisconsin ID at DMV Office". WUWM. Retrieved 22 September 2014.
  9. Pitrof, Marge (2014-09-12). "Walker Approves New Rules for Obtaining Voter ID, While Court Considers Law's Status". WUWM. Retrieved 22 September 2014.
  10. Glauber, Bill (2011-12-14). "At 84, she lacks identification, but not will to fight voter ID law". Journal Sentinel. Retrieved 22 September 2014.
  11. O'Brien, Brendan (April 29, 2014). "Federal judge strikes down Wisconsin voter ID law". Chicago Tribune. Reuters.
  12. Blake, Aaron (April 29, 2014). "Judge Strikes down Wisconsin Voter ID law". The Washington Post.
  13. Hall, Dee J.; Defour, Matthew (May 1, 2014). "Legislature cannot fix voter ID law before November election, leader says". Wisconsin State Journal.
  14. 1 2 3 Richard L. Hasen, Softening Voter ID Laws Through Litigation: Is It Enough?, 2016 Wis. L. Rev. Forward 100
  15. Milwaukee Branch of NAACP v. Walker, 851 N.W.2d 262, 2014 W.I. 98, 357 Wis. 2d 469 (2014).
  16. DeFour, Matthew (Jul 16, 2014). "U.S. attorney general wades into Wisconsin voter ID court battle". Wisconsin State Journal.
  17. Richmond, Todd; Tarm, Michael (2014-09-12). "Appeals Court Reinstates Wisconsin's Voter ID Law". Associated Press. Retrieved 22 September 2014.
  18. Frank v. Walker, 768 F.3d 744 (7th Cir. 2014).
  19. Frank v. Walker, 773 F.3d 783 (7th Cir. 2014).
  20. "High court blocks Wisconsin voter ID law". WPLG Local 10. 2014-10-09. Archived from the original on 2014-10-16. Retrieved 2014-10-10.
  21. Liptak, Adam (October 9, 2014) - "Courts Strike Down Voter ID Laws in Wisconsin and Texas". The New York Times. Retrieved December 26, 2014.
  22. Barnes, Robert (October 9, 2014) - "Supreme Court Blocks Wisconsin Voter ID Law". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 26, 2014.
  23. Frank v. Walker, 135 S. Ct. 7 (2014).
  24. SCOTUS (March 23, 2015). "ORDER LIST: 575 U.S.:CERTIORARI DENIED" (PDF). p. 3. Retrieved March 23, 2015.[ non-primary source needed ]
  25. Frank v. Walker, No. 11-C-1128 (E.D. Wis. July 19, 2016).
  26. Barnes, Robert. "Federal judge rules that Wisconsinites without ID can sign affidavit to vote". The Washington Post . Retrieved 25 November 2016.
  27. Zapotosky, Matt (30 September 2016). "Post Nation Federal judge orders investigation into Wisconsin's voter ID system". The Washington Post . Retrieved 25 November 2016.
  28. Michael Wines (11 August 2016). "Appeals Court Prevents Voting Without ID in Wisconsin". The New York Times . p. A10. Retrieved 25 November 2016.
  29. 1 2 Michael Wines (26 October 2016). "As ID Laws Fall, Voters See New Barriers Rise". The New York Times . p. A1. Retrieved 25 November 2016.
  30. Berman, Ari (29 September 2016). "Wisconsin Is Systematically Failing to Provide the Photo IDs Required to Vote in November". The Nation . Retrieved 25 November 2016.
  31. Neuman, Scott (29 June 2020). "Federal Court In Wisconsin Upholds Voting Restrictions Favored By Republicans". NPR . Retrieved 4 November 2020.