2024 IHC judges' letter

Last updated

The 2024 IHC judges' letter exposes allegations from the six incumbent judges of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) regarding interference by the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in judicial affairs. This unprecedented disclosure, implicating executive interference in judicial matters, ignited a significant controversy in Pakistan in April 2024. [1]

Contents

Timeline

On 26 March 2024, six serving judges of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) wrote a letter to the Supreme Judicial Council of Pakistan (SJCP), alleging interference by the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in judicial matters. The letter, authored by six judges: Mohsin Akhtar Kayani (senior puisne judge), Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Babar Sattar, Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan, Arbab Muhammad Tahir and Saman Rafat Imtiaz, documented instances of pressure on judges through the abduction and torture of their relatives and secret surveillance within their residences. Additionally, they questioned the existence of a state policy aimed at intimidating and coercing judges. The six judges also stated in the letter that they had raised the issue with the Chief Justice of the IHC Aamer Farooq before who had informed the six judges that he had "spoken to the DG-C of ISI and had been assured that no official from ISI will approach the judges of the IHC". [2] However, despite this assurance from the IHC Chief Justice, the six judges wrote that interference by intelligence operatives persisted. [3] [2] [4] Judges specifically cited Tyrian White case as one of the only matters that attracted "pressure" from intelligence officials. Judges wrote "considerable pressure was brought to bear on judges who had opined that the petition was not maintainable, by operatives of the ISI, through friends and relatives of these judges.” [5]

Subsequently, the next day on 27 March, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa convened a full court session to investigate the allegations raised by the judges. [6] [7] On that very day, former Prime Minister and founder of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Imran Khan, released a statement commending the six judges. He praised the six judges who have drawn attention to the concerning condition of the higher judiciary, and advocated for an impartial investigation into the issue. Former Islamabad High Court (IHC) judge Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui also remarked that the complaint lodged by the six judges served as validation for him. He noted that when he raised similar concerns in 2018, he was isolated. [7]

On 28 March, in a highly anticipated response, CJP Qazi Faez Isa said that the “interference by the executive” in the affairs and judicial workings of judges “will not be tolerated”. The same day, a meeting was held between CJP Isa and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif which also raised widespread concerns, with legal experts noting its unusual nature. Following this meeting, CJP Isa convened a second full court session to address the issue. During the meeting, a proposal was made to establish an inquiry commission led by a retired judge of "impeccable integrity" to investigate the matter. [8] [9]

On 30 March, the PM Shehbaz Sharif in a cabinet meeting approved the formation of an inquiry commission chaired by former Chief Justice of Pakistan Tassaduq Hussain Jillani. [10] [11] However, the oppositional (PTI) rejected the government's decision to establish an inquiry commission. [12] [8] and demanded the resignation of the CJP Isa as well Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court Aamer Farooq due to their perceived "inaction" regarding the interference of intelligence agencies in judicial affairs. [13] [14]

In a collective letter signed by over 300 lawyers and more than a dozen members of civil society, a large group of lawyers dismissed the appointment of a "powerless" one-man commission by the federal cabinet to probe these claims and urged the Supreme Court to initiate suo motu proceedings to investigate the allegations. Furthermore, they called on the Pakistan Bar Council and all bar associations to promptly convene a convention of lawyers to decide on a unified approach for preserving the independence of the judiciary. [15]

On 1 April, Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, in a letter to PM Shehbaz, withdrew from heading an inquiry commission to investigate the allegations. Concurrently, the Supreme Court took suo motu notice of the allegations raised by the six IHC judges and established a seven-member bench, including the CJP Isa, Justices Mansoor Ali Shah, Justices Yahya Afridi, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Musarrat Hilali, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, to adjudicate the issue. [16] However, PTI rejected the seven-member bench led by the CJP and insisted that the matter be heard by the full court rather than "like-minded judges." Additionally, they demanded for the proceedings to be telecast live. [17] The same day, during a session of the National Assembly, PTI leaders also brought up the issue and urged for the discussion of the judges' letter in parliament, with its chairman Gohar Ali Khan suggested that parliament should adopt a resolution condemning the interference of intelligence agencies. However, Speaker of the National Assembly Ayaz Sadiq stated that considering the sensitivity of the matter, he suggests that if the issue was under judicial consideration, it would be prudent to await the outcome of the case. [18]

On 2 April, all eight judges of the IHC, including the Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court Aamer Farooq and the six who authored the letter, received threatening letters containing a "chemical powder" from an unknown sender. The Chief Justice Farooq noted that the high court had been threatened. [19] Simultaneously, judges of the Supreme Court as well of the Lahore High Court (LHC) also reported receiving similar letters. [20] [21] PM Shehbaz announced that the government would initiate an investigation into the letters containing "suspicious powder" received by judges of the Supreme Court, LHC and IHC. [22] On 5 April, Prime Minister Shehbaz, CJP Isa as well Chief Minister Punjab Maryam Nawaz also received similar threatening letters. [23] PTI called for a inquiry into the threatening letters sent to judges and alleged that "sending threatening letters to judges is part of the government’s plot to intimidate and scare them so they could not give decisions based on justice and law." [24]

On 3 April, a seven-member bench of the Supreme Court convened to address the allegations. CJP Isa emphasized that any threats to the judiciary's independence would not be tolerated and suggested the possibility of convening a full court for a suo motu case in the next scheduled hearing on 29 April. [25] Supreme Court Justice Athar Minallah remarked that the letter addressed ongoing issues in Pakistan spanning the past 76 years and emphasized that "We can’t bury our heads like ostrich in the sands". [1] The same day, PTI held a press conference and demanded that CJP Isa should not be part of the bench, stating that they believed his meeting with PM Shehbaz had made the case and his own conduct controversial. [26]

On 5 April, The Pakistan Bar Council demanded a judicial commission composed of serving Supreme Court judges to investigate the matter impartially. [27]

On 8 April, a former general secretary of the Islamabad High Court Bar Association (IHCBA) lodged a reference with the SJCP against senior puisne judge of IHC, Justice Kayani. The allegation stated that Justice Kayani "waged a war against the forces of Pakistan in a planned manner by inducing and convincing other judges of high court". [28] Following this, the Islamabad Bar Council criticized the petition, denouncing it as "Baseless" and describing the reference as an egregious misuse of the legal system and a deliberate effort to undermine the judiciary. [29] The IHCBA also petitioned the Supreme Court, and urged it to conduct an investigation into the letter. [30]

On 19 April, Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court (LHC) Malik Shehzad Ahmed Khan also called for a full court meeting of LHC judges on 22 April to address concerns regarding the preservation of judicial independence following allegations raised by IHC judges. [31]

On 24 April, a full-court session of the IHC unanimously decided to implement various measures, including the reactivation of 'empowered' inspection teams, aimed at curbing the purported interference of intelligence officials in judicial matters. [32] Before the Supreme Court hearing on 30 April, the court consolidated a total of ten petitions seeking the court's intervention regarding the letter. [33]

Judicial sources also observed a rise in mudslinging targeting judges, especially following the publication of the letter. [34] On 28 April, IHC denounced what it termed as a 'malicious' social media campaign against Justice Babar Sattar - one of the six judges who authored the letter. The court strongly condemned the dissemination of confidential information, including the Sattar's family travel documents, which were leaked online.″ [35]

On 1 May, the Peshawar High Court in its report to the SC acknowledged interference by intelligence agencies in judicial matters. It disclosed that some judges had reported direct approaches from intelligence officials seeking favors in political cases and also acknowledged that judges faced life threats from "non-state actors" in Afghanistan when those political cases were decided impartially. [36] [37] The LHC in its reply submitted in the SC also acknowledged intelligence agencies' interference in judicial affairs. [38] The Sindh High Court in its proposal submitted to the SC, emphasized the necessity of investigating interference in the judiciary by intelligence agencies and suggested prohibiting direct access to judges. While the Balochistan High Court noted that the grievances of IHC judges should have been addressed at the high court level. [39]

As the Supreme Court reconvened with a six-judge bench on 30 April to address the judges' letter case, diverging opinions emerged. CJP Isa proposed legislation to regulate intelligence agencies, while two other senior judges, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Athar Minallah, advocated judicial intervention to prevent future intrusions. [40] Following the proceedings, PTI voiced its dissatisfaction with CJP Isa's conduct during the hearing of the case and alleged a divide within the judiciary, with the CJP Isa on one side and also demanded his disassociation from the bench. [41]

Reaction

An official of Intelligence agency denied the claims made in the letter and said that “the accusations made by the honourable judges of IHC are frivolous in nature and out of context. The cases against the former prime minister Imran Khan are purely legal and have nothing to do with law enforcement agencies." [1]

Reception

This letter was acknowledged as a "strongest act of defiance", since the judges' stance against Pervez Musharraf's imposition of emergency rule in 2007. [42]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Pakistan</span> Highest authority court of Pakistan

The Supreme Court of Pakistan is the apex court in the judicial hierarchy of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Justice of Pakistan</span> Presiding judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan

The chief justice of Pakistan is the chief judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan and is the highest-ranking officer of the Pakistani judiciary. The officeholder is the senior most of 17 justices of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Athar Minallah</span> Pakistani judge (born 1961)

Athar Minallah is a Pakistani lawyer, and jurist who is serving as a judge of Supreme Court of Pakistan since 11 November 2022. Before his appointment to the Supreme Court of Pakistan, he was a judge of the Islamabad High Court for 8 years, and also served as its 5th Chief Justice from 28 November 2018 to 10 November 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tassaduq Hussain Jillani</span> Pakistani judge (born 1949)

Tassaduq Hussain Jillani is a Pakistani judge who served as the 21st Chief Justice of Pakistan from 2013 to 2014. He previously served as a justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan from 2004, after being nominated as a justice of the Lahore High Court by Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto in 1994.

Qazi Faez Isa is a Pakistani jurist who is currently serving as the 29th Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) since 17 September 2023. He was appointed as a justice of the Supreme Court in 2014, having previously served as the chief justice of Balochistan High Court from 2009 to 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 Pakistani general election</span>

General elections were held in Pakistan on 25 July 2018 to elect the members of the 15th National Assembly and the four Provincial Assemblies. The three major parties were Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), led by Imran Khan, the Pakistan Muslim League, led by Shehbaz Sharif, and the Pakistan People's Party, led by Bilawal Bhutto. The PTI won the most seats in the National Assembly but fell short of a majority; the party subsequently formed a coalition government with several smaller parties. At the provincial level, the PTI remained the largest party in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP); the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) retained its dominance in Sindh; and the newly formed Balochistan Awami Party (BAP) emerged as the largest party in Balochistan. In Punjab, the result was a hung parliament, with the Pakistan Muslim League (N) winning the most seats. However, after several independent MPAs joined the PTI, the latter became the largest party and was able to form a government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saqib Nisar</span> Pakistani judge (born 1954)

Mian Saqib Nisar is a Pakistani jurist who served as the 25th Chief Justice of Pakistan from 31 December 2016 till 17 January 2019. He has previously served as the Law Secretary. He also served as a visiting professor of law at the University of the Punjab, where he provided instructions on constitutional law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mansoor Ali Shah</span> Pakistani judge

Syed Mansoor Ali Shah is a Pakistani jurist who is serving as a Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. He formerly served as the 45th Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court.

For other people named Shaukat Aziz, see Shaukat Aziz (disambiguation).

Umar Ata Bandial is a Pakistani jurist who served as the 28th Chief Justice of Pakistan from February 2022 to September 2023. He was appointed as the Chief Justice after the approval by President Arif Alvi on 13 January 2022, after which he assumed his office on 2 February 2022 and retired on 16 September 2023.

Mohsin Akhtar Kayani is a Pakistani jurist who has been Justice of the Islamabad High Court since 22 December 2015.

Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri is a Pakistani jurist who has been Justice of the Islamabad High Court, since 28 December 2020.

Lettergate is an American-Pakistani political affair set off by a conversation at a farewell lunch for Asad Majeed Khan, then-Pakistani ambassador to the United States, on 7 March 2022 at Khan's official residence known as the Pakistan House. A diplomatic telegram was sent by Ambassador Khan to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs based on the notes taken by a note-taker from the embassy of Pakistan based in Washington, D.C. The telegram allegedly stated that in the course of the meeting, the United States had expressed a desire to the government of Pakistan for prime minister Imran Khan to be removed from office because of his neutral stance on the war between Russia and Ukraine and refusal to back the Ukrainians, promising warmer relations if Pakistan agrees while threatening isolation if it does not. The lunch was attended by US officials including then US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu and Deputy Assistant Secretary Lesslie Viguerie. The Pakistani diplomats attending the lunch meeting included Deputy Chief of Mission Syed Naveed Bokhari and the defence attaché.

The Pakistan audio leaks controversy stems from several leaked audio conversations involving Pakistan's prime minister Shehbaz Sharif and former prime minister Imran Khan among others. The leaks began on 24 September 2022, when multiple audio files of purported conversations, allegedly recorded in the Prime Minister's Office, surfaced online. On 28 September 2022, a National Security Committee (NSC) meeting was convened to discuss matters related to national security, including the audio leaks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Irfan Qadir</span> Pakistani lawyer and jurist (born 1956)

Irfan Qadir is a Pakistani lawyer and jurist who is incumbent Special Assistant to the Prime Minister for Law since 30 April 2024. Previously he served as the Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Accountability and Interior from September 2022 to August 2023. He also served as the 29th Attorney-General for Pakistan from April 2012 to June 2013, and was a Justice of the Lahore High Court in 2009.

Arbab Muhammad Tahir is a Pakistani jurist who has been Justice of the Islamabad High Court, since 17 December 2021.

Saman Rafat Imtiaz is a Pakistani jurist and has held the position of Justice at the Islamabad High Court (IHC) since 17 December 2021. She is the second woman judge to be appointed to the IHC, following Lubna Saleem Pervez.

Babar Sattar, serves as a Pakistani jurist and has held the position of Justice at the Islamabad High Court (IHC) since 30 December 2020.

Abul Hasnat Muhammad Zulqarnain, is a Pakistani jurist who is a District and Sessions Judge in the service of Islamabad Judicial Service.

Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan is a Pakistani jurist who has been Justice of the Islamabad High Court since 17 December 2021 .

References

  1. 1 2 3 Baloch, Shah Meer (3 April 2024). "Pakistani judges say intelligence agency threatened them over Imran Khan". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
  2. 1 2 Asad, Malik (27 March 2024). "IHC judges detail 'brazen meddling' in letter to Supreme Judicial Council". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
  3. ↑ Hussain, Abid. "Judges vs spies: Pakistan's jurists accuse intel agency ISI of intimidation". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  4. ↑ "Six IHC judges seek SJC's action over spy agencies interference". The Express Tribune. 27 March 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  5. ↑ Asad, Malik (15 April 2024). "'Meddling' claims bring Tyrian White case back into limelight". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
  6. ↑ "Allegations of judicial interference spark calls for probe". The Express Tribune. 27 March 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  7. 1 2 "Calls for probe into letter by 6 IHC judges on 'brazen meddling' in judicial affairs". DAWN.COM. 27 March 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  8. 1 2 "Interference of executive in judicial affairs will not be tolerated: CJP Isa". DAWN.COM. 28 March 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  9. ↑ "SC endorses inquiry over judges' letter". The Express Tribune. 28 March 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  10. ↑ "Ex-CJ Jillani to helm IHC letter inquiry". The Express Tribune. 30 March 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  11. ↑ Tahir, Zulqernain (31 March 2024). "Ex-CJP Jillani picked to probe meddling claims". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  12. ↑ "PTI rejects inquiry commission on judges' letter". The Express Tribune. 28 March 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  13. ↑ Asad, Malik (30 March 2024). "PTI calls on SC, IHC CJs to resign for 'inaction' over meddling". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  14. ↑ "PTI targets top justices amid letter turmoil". The Express Tribune. 29 March 2024. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  15. ↑ Abbasi, Kashif (1 April 2024). "Lawyers say yes to 'suo motu', no to 'powerless commission'". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
  16. ↑ "IHC judges' letter: Jillani recuses himself from inquiry commission as SC takes suo motu notice". DAWN.COM. 1 April 2024. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
  17. ↑ Junaidi, Ikram (2 April 2024). "PTI rejects 'like-minded' bench, demands full court". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
  18. ↑ Wasim, Amir (2 April 2024). "Chaos in NA as opposition stopped from debating letter". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
  19. ↑ Burney, Umer (2 April 2024). "FIR registered as all 8 IHC judges receive threatening letters laced with 'white powder'". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
  20. ↑ Bilal, Rana (3 April 2024). "4 LHC judges also receive letters; official refrains from commenting on nature of missives". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 3 April 2024.
  21. ↑ "Nine more judges receive 'toxic' mail". DAWN.COM. 4 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
  22. ↑ "Govt will probe letters laced with 'suspicious powder' received by judges: PM Shehbaz". DAWN.COM. 4 April 2024. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
  23. ↑ "More judges receive letters with 'toxic' powder". DAWN.COM. 6 April 2024. Retrieved 6 April 2024.
  24. ↑ Raza, Syed Irfan (6 April 2024). "PTI demands thorough probe into threat letters to judges". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 6 April 2024.
  25. ↑ Bhatti, Haseeb (3 April 2024). "CJP says attack on judiciary's independence won't be tolerated, hints at full court for suo motu case". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 3 April 2024.
  26. ↑ Junaidi, Ikram (4 April 2024). "Even in protest, PTI to take parliamentary route, says Gohar". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
  27. ↑ Iqbal, Nasir (6 April 2024). "Pakistan Bar Council proposes sitting SC judges' commission on 'meddling' issue". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 6 April 2024.
  28. ↑ Asad, Malik (9 April 2024). "Complaint against IHC judge Mohsin Akhtar Kayani lands before Supreme Judicial Council". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 9 April 2024.
  29. ↑ "Islamabad Bar Council Condemns 'Baseless' Reference Filed Against Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani". The Friday Times. 9 April 2024. Retrieved 9 April 2024.
  30. ↑ "IHCBA Urges SC To Order Probe Into IHC Judges' Letter". The Friday Times. 18 April 2024. Retrieved 18 April 2024.
  31. ↑ Bilal, Rana (19 April 2024). "LHC top judge summons full court on Monday to discuss protection of judicial independence". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 19 April 2024.
  32. ↑ Asad, Malik (24 April 2024). "IHC judges look to create bulwark against meddling". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 27 April 2024.
  33. ↑ "SC clubs petitions on 'meddling' by spy agencies". Dawn. 27 April 2024. Retrieved 27 April 2024.
  34. ↑ Asad, Malik (3 May 2024). "IHC set to take up anonymous complaint against senior judge Mohsin Kayani". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 3 May 2024.
  35. ↑ Burney, Umer (28 April 2024). "IHC condemns 'malicious' social media campaign against Justice Babar Sattar". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 28 April 2024.
  36. ↑ "PHC proposes legislation for stipulating mandate of intelligence agencies". Dawn . 2 May 2024. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  37. ↑ Malik, Hasnaat (1 May 2024). "PHC also admits spy agencies 'interfere' in cases". The Express Tribune. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  38. ↑ Maik, Hasnat (2 May 2024). "Punjab judiciary seeks end to executive control". The Express Tribune. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  39. ↑ "Interference In Judiciary By Security Agencies Needs To Be Probed: SHC". The Friday Times. 2 May 2024. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  40. ↑ Iqbal, Nasir (1 May 2024). "SC judges differ on measures to curb 'meddling'". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  41. ↑ Junaidi, Ikram (2 May 2024). "PTI alleges CJP not on judiciary side over meddling controversy". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  42. ↑ Murtaza, Dr. Niaz (29 April 2024). "Judges And Spies". The Friday Times. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.