AB v CD (Australia)

Last updated

AB v CD; EF v CD
Coat of Arms of Australia.svg
Court High Court of Australia
Full case nameAB (a pseudonym) v CD (a pseudonym); EF (a pseudonym) v CD (a pseudonym)
Decided5 November 2018
Citation(s) [2018] HCA 58
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon & Edelman JJ
Case opinions
special leave to appeal revoked
(per Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon & Edelman JJ)

AB v CD; EF v CD is a decision of the High Court of Australia.

Contents

The decision is notable for revealing the 'Lawyer X' scandal to the Australian public. At issue was the use of the criminal barrister Nicola Gobbo as a secret informant by the Victorian Police.

Gobbo's assistance as an informant enabled a large number of prosecutions by the Victorian Crown; especially against organised criminals. [1] Her assistance was in breach of numerous legal duties she owed to her clients.

In its reasons, the High Court declared that the public interest in maintaining the anonymity of police informants was outweighed by the public interest in disclosing the details of what had occurred. In its view, the 'agency of police informer' had been 'so abused as to corrupt the criminal justice system'. [2] The High Court therefore revoked special leave and affirmed the Court of Appeal's judgement. [3]

Details of the case became public one month after the judgement. [4] This ignited significant public debate, especially due to concerns that following the judgement, numerous convictions related to the Melbourne gangland killings and other organised crime would be expunged. [5] Following calls for a public inquiry, Daniel Andrews the Premier of Victoria announced in December 2018 the creation of the Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants to investigate the scandal. [6]

Facts

Victoria Police officers The thin blue line at Parliament House.jpg
Victoria Police officers

In February 2015 the Victorian IBAC provided a report to the Victorian Police (AB) and Victorian Director of Public Prosecutions (CD). The report concerned the way Victoria Police had deployed Nicola Gobbo (EF) as a police informant in obtaining criminal convictions against Tony Mokbel and six criminal associates. [Note 1] In the report, it was found that while Gobbo had been purporting to act as counsel for the convicted persons; she had provided information to the Victorian Police which undermined their ability to defend themselves at trial. [7] Following this report, John Champion as director determined that he was under a duty to disclose some of the information contained within the IBAC report to the persons who had been convicted. [7]

In the months which followed, Victoria Police undertook an assessment of the risk to Gobbo if the director disclosed the information. They concluded that the risk of death would be 'almost certain'. On 10 June 2016, the police commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court seeking declarations that the information CD proposed to disclose was subject to public interest immunity. On 11 November Gobbo was added as plaintiff. On 15 November Gobbo instituted a separate proceeding on the basis of an equitable obligation of confidence. [8]

Both proceedings were heard together in camera without notice to the convicted persons. Nevertheless, advocates presented arguments on those persons' behalf as amici curiae; the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions both intervened after being granted leave, and advocated for disclosure. [9]

On 19 June 2017 Ginnane J gave judgement at first instance dismissing the arguments of the Police and Gobbo. In his judgement, the public interest in preserving the anonymity of police informers and the welfare of Gobbo and her children was outweighed by those favoring disclosure. Reasons favoring disclosure included the assistance the information might afford to the convicted persons in having their convictions overturned, and the maintenance of public confidence in the integrity of the criminal justice system. [10]

On 21 November 2017 the Court of Appeal (Ferguson CJ, Osborn J, and McLeish JJA) dismissed AB & EF's appeals, on the basis of similar reasons to the trial judge. [11]

On 9 May 2018, AB was granted special leave to appeal to the High court. [12]

Judgment

After receiving extensive written submissions, the High Court regarded the 'only arguable issue' underpinning the various grounds of appeal was whether 'it was no longer possible adequately to protect the safety of EF and her children in the event of disclosure'. The court invited arguments from the Police as to further detailed evidence of what could be done to secure the safety of Gobbo and her children in the event of disclosure. In effect, the police submitted that Gobbo agreeing to enter into a witness protection program would be a possible solution to that issue. [13]

Following that submission, the High Court invited oral arguments, and subsequently delivered a unanimous judgement ordering that special leave be revoked. [14]

The court said of the Lawyer X scandal generally; 'it is greatly to be hoped that it will never be repeated'. They went on to say: [15]

'(Gobbo's) actions in purporting to act as counsel for the Convicted Persons while covertly informing against them were fundamental and appalling breaches of (her) obligations as counsel to her clients and of (her) duties to the court. Likewise, Victoria Police were guilty of reprehensible conduct in knowingly encouraging (Gobbo) to do as she did and were involved in sanctioning atrocious breaches of the sworn duty of every police officer to discharge all duties imposed on them faithfully and according to law without favour or affection, malice or ill-will.

As a result, the prosecution of each Convicted Person was corrupted in a manner which debased fundamental premises of the criminal justice system.'

...

the maintenance of the integrity of the criminal justice system demands that the information be disclosed and that the propriety of each Convicted Person's conviction be re-examined in light of the information. The public interest in preserving EF's anonymity must be subordinated to the integrity of the criminal justice system.

The court then acknowledged the 'grave risk of harm' if Gobbo refused to enter witness protection. It also acknowledged why Gobbo had declined to do so thus far, [Note 2] and the 'large measure of responsibility' the Victorian Police had for the whole situation. [Note 3] Nevertheless, the court ordered that it was 'essential in the public interest' for the information to be disclosed. [16]

Speaking generally, the court concluded by saying it is of the 'utmost importance' that anonymity assurances be honoured; and as such be ordinarily protected by public interest immunity. However, 'where ... the agency of police informer has been so abused as to corrupt the criminal justice system, there arises a greater public interest in disclosure to which the informer anonymity must yield'. [2]

The court concluded by commenting that if Gobbo was unwilling to enter the witness protection program, she would be 'bound by the consequences'; and that in the interests of protecting her children, the Government could take them away from her. [2]

Significance and aftermath

The judgement was made public one month after the court's decision. [4] Once publicly revealed, the lawyer X scandal generated significant outcry visible across Australian news media. Concerns were raised that due to the revealed police behavior numerous convictions related to the Melbourne gangland killings would be expunged. [5] Estimates as to the number of cases affected by the affair range between 386 and 600. [1] [6]

Prominent silks publicly called for a formal public inquiry following the judgement. [17] On December 5 a Royal Commission was ordered by the Victorian Government into the scandal. [6] The 'Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants' is due to deliver its final report in on November 30, 2020. [18]

Nicola Gobbo's name was not formally revealed to the public until 5 February 2019. Nevertheless Melbourne Law School Criminal Law professor Jeremy Gans described Gobbo's name as a 'theoretical secret'; [19] and it is clear from reporting at the time of the judgement that Gobbo's name was already widely known. [20]

The role that the judiciary played in the 'Lawyer X' scandal has also been criticized by academics. In a contemporaneous blog post hosted by the University of Melbourne, Professor Gans wrote: [19]

'Amidst the many ramifications of the scandal, I hope that Victoria's courts will themselves reflect on two indirect roles they played in these events. First, in the midst of the police's use of EF as an informant against her clients, Victoria's courts (and the High Court) ruled in favour of novel policing methods, despite concerns that their use would override suspects' common law rights and invite police corruption. Second, throughout the aftermath of Melbourne's gangland war, Victoria's courts imposed extensive suppression orders that, while well-intentioned, have largely prevented the public from gaining a full understanding of the methods used by Victoria Police in response.'

Nevertheless, much of the public commentary regarding the case has focused upon the actions of the Victorian Police and Gobbo. [1] [5] [6] [20] It is anticipated that the final report of the royal commission will declare that Tony Mokbel did not receive a fair trial as a result of the affair, and perhaps also Pat Barbaro. [21] [6]

Notable quashed convictions

On 26 July 2019, Faruk Orman was released from gaol after 12 years in prison. He was the first person to have their conviction quashed as a result of the scandal. Orman was found guilty by a jury in 2002 for his role as getaway driver in the killing of Victor Peirce. [22]

On 30 October 2020, Zlate Cvetanovski was released after 11 years in prison. He had been convicted for drug trafficking. [23]

Notes

  1. ↑ Gobbo's codename as police informant was 'witness 3838'
  2. ↑ Gobbo did not trust the police to maintain her confidentiality. She apparently was more willing to bear the risk of going without protection than subject herself to the limitations and burdens of such a program.
  3. ↑ Victoria Police were responsible in the words of the court for having 'initially encouraged her to inform against her clients as she did'

Related Research Articles

The Melbourne gangland killings were the murders of 36 underworld figures in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, between January 1998 and August 2010. The murders were retributive killings involving underworld groups. The deaths caused a power vacuum within Melbourne's criminal community, and rival factions fought for control and influence. Many of the murders remain unsolved, although detectives from the Purana Taskforce believe that Carl Williams was responsible for at least ten of them. The period culminated in the arrest of Williams, who pleaded guilty on 28 February 2007 to three of the murders.

Carl Anthony Williams was an Australian convicted murderer and drug trafficker from Melbourne, Victoria. He was a central figure in the Melbourne gangland killings as well as their final victim.

Victor George Peirce was an Australian gangster from Melbourne, Victoria. Peirce was a member of the Pettingill family, which was headed by matriarch and former Richmond brothel owner Kath Pettingill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tony Mokbel</span> Australian criminal (born 1965)

Antonios Sajih Mokbel is an Australian criminal who has been convicted of a number of offences, most prominently commercial drug trafficking. He has spent most of his life in Melbourne, Australia. Operation Purana alleged that he is the mastermind behind the Melbourne amphetamine trade. He has been linked to Carl Williams, and charged but not convicted of two murders in the Melbourne gangland war. He disappeared from Melbourne while on trial in March 2006, and was arrested by Greek police in Athens on 5 June 2007. Since being brought back to Australia he has remained incarcerated.

Christopher Murray Maxwell is an Australian jurist. He succeeded Justice John Winneke as President of the Victorian Court of Appeal on 16 July 2005.

Zarah Garde-Wilson is an Australian solicitor in Victoria who rose to prominence after she acted for many persons under investigation by Victoria Police in relation to the Melbourne gangland killings of 1998–2006.

The Catholic sexual abuse scandal in Victoria is part of the Catholic clerical sexual abuse in Australia and the much wider Catholic sexual abuse scandal in general, which involves charges, convictions, trials and ongoing investigations into allegations of sex crimes committed by Catholic priests and members of religious orders. The Catholic Church in Victoria has been implicated in a reported 40 suicides among about 620 sexual abuse victims acknowledged to the public after internal investigations by the Catholic Church in Victoria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Margaret McMurdo</span> Australian judge

Margaret Anne McMurdo is the former president of the Queensland Court of Appeal. Appointed on 30 July 1998, she was the first female president of an appellate court in Australia. She resigned effective 24 March 2017 after more than 18 years as a justice of the Court of Appeal.

Jill Hennessy is a former Australian politician. She has been a Labor Party member of the Victorian Legislative Assembly between February 2010 and November 2022, representing the seat of Altona. She was Minister for Health in the Andrews Ministry from December 2014 to November 2018, and was Attorney-General from November 2018 to December 2020, the second female Attorney-General in Victoria's history.

Nicola Maree Gobbo, sometimes known as Nikki Gobbo, is an Australian former criminal defence barrister and police informant.

In 2004 the murders of Terence and Christine Hodson caused the Victorian government to establish the Office of Police Integrity to investigate probable Victoria Police involvement in the murders and to investigate the leaking of sensitive police information to the Melbourne underworld.

<i>Tuckiar v The King</i> 1934 Australian High Court case

Tuckiar v The King is a landmark 1934 judgment of the High Court of Australia. The matter examined the behaviour of the judge and lawyers in the trial of Yolngu man Dhakiyarr (Tuckiar) Wirrpanda in the Northern Territory Supreme Court a year earlier for one of the Caledon Bay murders, and overturned the judgment which had found the appellant guilty and sentenced him to death.

Noble cause corruption is corruption caused by the adherence to a teleological ethical system, suggesting that people will use unethical or illegal means to attain desirable goals, a result which appears to benefit the greater good. Where traditional corruption is defined by personal gain, noble cause corruption forms when someone is convinced of their righteousness, and will do anything within their powers to achieve the desired result. An example of noble cause corruption is police misconduct "committed in the name of good ends" or neglect of due process through "a moral commitment to make the world a safer place to live."

Graham Leonard Ashton is an Australian police officer who was the Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police from 2015 to 2020. He also served in the Australian Federal Police for a long period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission</span> Australian police oversight organisation

The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) is Victoria's anti-corruption integrity agency with jurisdiction over the public sector. It does this by:

Criminal activity in Victoria, Australia is combated by the Victoria Police and the Victorian court system, while statistics about crime are managed by the Crime Statistics Agency. Modern Australian states and cities, including Victoria, have some of the lowest crime rates recorded globally with Australia ranked the 13th safest nation and Melbourne ranked the 5th safest city globally. As of September 2018 the CBD of Melbourne had the highest rate of overall criminal incidents in the state (15,949.9), followed by Latrobe (12,896.1) and Yarra (11,119.2). Rural areas have comparatively high crime rates, with towns such as Mildura (9,222.0) and Greater Shepparton (9,111.8) having some of the highest crime rates in the state.

Informer 3838 is an Australian television series focusing on criminal barrister-turned police informer Nicola Gobbo and her involvement in the Melbourne gangland killings. It is a spin-off of the Underbelly franchise, with various actors reprising their role from previous series. Commissioned by the Nine Network and produced by Screentime, it was broadcast between 20 and 27 April 2020.

Joseph Acquaro also known as Joe Acquaro or Pino was a Melbourne lawyer, businessman and former president of Melbourne's Italian Chamber of Commerce and the Reggio Calabria Club who was shot to death on 15 March 2016 at age 54.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants</span> Victorian Royal Commission

The Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants - An inquiry into Victoria Police’s use of Nicola Gobbo as a human source, referred to in the press as Lawyer X Royal Commission, was a royal commission in Victoria, Australia set up to examine the actions of Nicola Gobbo and Victoria Police whilst Gobbo, also referred to as Informer 3838, Lawyer X (media), and EF (litigation), was working as a lawyer and acting as a registered informer. It was announced on 3 December 2018, in response to the High Court AB v CD; EF v CD judgement, and was established on 13 December 2018 under Hon Margaret McMurdo to examine the adequacy and effectiveness of the processes of Victoria Police for the recruitment, handling and management of human sources who are subject to legal obligations of confidentiality or privilege and the effect of using such sources on past cases.

The Kellem review was an Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) inquiry undertaken by Murray Kellam from July 2014 to February 2015 into Victoria Police human source management. The review was initiated in response to newspaper reports about the actions of lawyer Nicola Gobbo in providing information to police.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Melbourne gangland lawyer explains why she became a police informant". www.abc.net.au. 4 December 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 12
  3. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 13
  4. 1 2 "The Travesty in the Background to AB (a pseudonym) v CD (a pseudonym); EF (a pseudonym) v CD (a pseudonym): JB v The Queen | Opinions on High". 10 December 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 "Gangsters, cops and Lawyer X: the police informant scandal that has shocked Australia". the Guardian. 5 December 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 "Gangland driver to be first murderer to appeal over Lawyer X". www.heraldsun.com.au. 4 December 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  7. 1 2 AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 1
  8. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 2
  9. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 3
  10. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 4
  11. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 5
  12. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 6
  13. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 7
  14. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 8
  15. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 10
  16. ↑ AB v CD [2018] HCA 58 at para. 11
  17. ↑ "Call for inquiry into Melbourne gangland convictions". www.theaustralian.com.au. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  18. ↑ "Key dates | Royal Commission into Management of Police Informants Content Management System". www.rcmpi.vic.gov.au. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  19. 1 2 "News: The Court reveals a legal scandal | Opinions on High". 3 December 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  20. 1 2 "The 'Lawyer X' scandal is an astounding snapshot of Melbourne's gangland past". Crikey. 4 December 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  21. ↑ "Royal commission lawyers lay out potentially 'catastrophic consequences' of Lawyer X scandal". www.abc.net.au. 1 September 2020. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  22. ↑ "Gangland figure wipes away tears as court grants freedom due to Lawyer X". www.abc.net.au. 26 July 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  23. ↑ "Informer 3838: Second underworld conviction overturned in wake of Lawyer X scandal". amp-theage-com-au.cdn.ampproject.org. 30 October 2020. Archived from the original on 31 October 2020. Retrieved 30 October 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.