Abortion in South Korea

Last updated
Abortion 5 (cropped).jpg
A crowd at a landmark ruling
Abortion 1.jpg
Protest sign
Constitutional Court of South Korea, 11 April 2019, 65-year-old-ban on abortion overturned.

Abortion in South Korea was decriminalized, effective 1 January 2021, by a 2019 order of the Constitutional Court of Korea. It is currently legal throughout pregnancy, as no new law has been enacted [1] . Thus there are no gestational limits or other restrictions.

Contents

From 1953 through 2020, abortion was illegal in most circumstances, but illegal abortions were widespread and commonly performed at hospitals and clinics. [2] On 11 April 2019, the Constitutional Court ruled the abortion ban unconstitutional and ordered the law's revision by the end of 2020. [3] [4] Revisions to the law were proposed in October 2020, but not voted on by the deadline of 31 December 2020. [5]

The government of South Korea criminalized abortion in the 1953 Criminal Code in all circumstances. The law was amended by the Maternal and Child Health Law of 1973 to permit a physician to perform an abortion if the pregnant woman or her spouse has a certain hereditary or communicable diseases, if the pregnancy results from rape or incest, or if continuing the pregnancy would jeopardize the woman's health. Any physician who violated the law could be punished by two years' imprisonment. Self-induced abortions could be punished by a fine or imprisonment. [6] [7]

The abortion law was not strongly enforced, especially during campaigns to lower South Korea's high fertility rate in the 1970s and 1980s. As the fertility rate dropped in the 2000s, the government and anti-abortion campaigners turned their attention to illegal abortions [8] [7] and the government stepped up enforcement of the abortion law in response. [9]

Sex-selective abortion, attributed to a cultural preference for sons, was common until the early 1990s but today has all but disappeared. [8] Despite a 1987 revision of the Medical Code prohibiting physicians from using prenatal testing to reveal the sex of the child, the ratio of boys to girls at birth continued to climb into the early the 1990s, but the trend has reversed ever since. The 1987 law was ruled unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court in 2008. [10]

History

The Korean Criminal Code (1953)

Abortion in South Korea was originally criminalized with the introduction of the Korean Criminal Code (also known as The Penal Code in South Korea) in 1953, particularly because of Article 269 and 270 of the Criminal Code. [7] [11] Article 269 outlaws both self-induced abortions by the pregnant woman herself and abortions performed by medical professionals with the pregnant woman's request or consent, stating criminal penalty for each condition. [7] [12] Article 270 specifically prohibits medical practitioners, licensed doctors or other medical professionals from performing abortions, even with the pregnant woman's request or consent. [7] [12]

The criminal penalty varies from one year's imprisonment or a fine of 2 million won (approximately $1,750) if the abortion is self-induced by the pregnant woman herself, and ten years imprisonment if the abortion is performed by medical practitioners, with or without the pregnant woman's request or consent, causing the death of the woman. [7] [12] In general, criminal penalties for medical professionals who perform abortions are much stronger than for pregnant women. Additionally, if a doctor is involved in abortion, the license of the doctor will be suspended for a maximum of seven years. [7]

In 1992, a special congressional committee tried to pass the revised Articles 269 and 270 by introducing lessened thresholds and penalties pertaining to abortion. However, its attempt failed to pass the Conservative-controlled National Assembly. [7]

The Korean Criminal Code was first introduced in 1953, the year the Korean War ended. The post-war conditions included a drastic population decline and general social instability. Many explanations tracing the history and legislative purpose of Article 269 and 270 propose that the two provisions were designed to address post-Korean War conditions by promoting the sanctity of lives and population growth. [11]

The Mother and Child Health Act (1973)

Introduced in 1973, the Mother and Child Health Act states five special circumstances under which the abortion is legally allowed. [11] The five circumstances are:

  1. when the pregnant woman or her spouse has any eugenic or genetic disability or disease;
  2. when the pregnant woman or her spouse has any infectious disease;
  3. when the pregnancy is a result of rape or quasi-rape;
  4. when the pregnancy happens between two individuals who are legally unable to marry (such as blood relatives in incestuous relationships);
  5. when the continuation of pregnancy could potentially harm the health of the pregnant woman. [7] [11]

However, there are several reasons why the applicability of Mother and Child Health Act might be narrow in practical cases. First, in some cases, the Supreme Court ruled that an abortion was regarded as illegal if the fetus was diagnosed with Down syndrome. [7] Second, in regards to the third condition (when the pregnancy is a result of rape or quasi-rape), the stigma associated with rape might prevent pregnant women in South Korea from openly seeking legalization of their abortions, [7] and the legal concept of rape has limited meanings that could potentially dismiss many cases. [13]

The Mother and Child Health Act requires spousal consent in for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion based on these circumstances, which might create practical complications for women to obtain legal abortions. [7] The fifth condition (where the continuation of pregnancy could potentially harm the health of pregnant women) narrows the "harm" of pregnancy to merely harm of the woman's health, ignoring the possible socio-economic reasons for which a pregnant woman might seek an abortion. [7] [13] [11]

The Korean Medical Service Act (revisions in 1987 and 1994)

The revision of the Korean Medical Service Act in 1987 prohibits medical practitioners from examining or assisting in examining pregnant women to determine the sex of the fetus. [13] [11] Further, the medical provider is banned from disclosing the sex of the fetus to the pregnant woman, members in her family, or any other people during the pregnancy. [7] [11] Although this provision does not explicitly mention abortion, it potentially prohibits sex-selective abortions that are largely the result of the preference for male children in South Korea. South Korea underwent rapid economic and social development in the 1980s, during which time the birth rate decreased significantly. Many people in South Korea started to determine the sex of the fetus with the help of diagnostic technology, resulting in female feticide. [13]

In 1994, the Korean Medical Service Act was revised to provide criminal penalties for medical professions. Medical professionals who disclose the sex of the fetus could be punished with a maximum of three years imprisonment or a fine of 10 million won (approximately $8,450). [13] The South Korean sex ratio at birth (male to female) has changed from 1.14 (114 boys were born at birth for every 100 girls) in 1986 to 1.07 (107 boys were born at birth for every 100 girls) in 2016, which suggests a decline of male preference. [13]

Growing debate (1994–2019)

Debate concerning the future of abortion regulation in South Korea has gained traction both in internet chatrooms and government offices. Until South Korea's recent ruling that declared anti-abortion laws unconstitutional, the anti-abortion camp in South Korea predominately advocated for a general crackdown on abortions. [14]

In 2009, legislators took a small step towards cracking down on abortions in South Korea by "removing certain diseases off the list justified for the use of legal abortions and revising the deadline for legal abortions to twenty-four weeks from conception instead of twenty-eight weeks." [14]

Key political players in South Korea were responsible for extensive anti-abortion campaigns. The Minister of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Jeon Jae-hee, stated that "even if [the government doesn't] intend to hold anyone accountable for all ... illegal abortions in the past, [they] must crack down on them from now on." Similarly, Rep. Chang Yoon-seok, of the Grand National Party, stated that "[t]he most important thing will be for the doctors to understand that abortion is a serious crime." [14]

In January 2010, President Lee Myung-bak decided it was "time to start the debate" on revising the Mother and Child Health Law and scheduled public hearings. This, along with shifting public opinion, encouraged the government to commence a public relations campaign to discourage abortions, which included subway posters that read: "With abortion, you are aborting the future." [14]

The topic of abortion was never discussed as a human rights issue in South Korea. The National Human Rights Commission (TNHRC), a national advocacy institution for human rights since its founding in 2002, noted that the issue of abortion was a "controversial issue in the 'Right to Life' section of its 2007 National Action Plan." [14]

Aside from TNHRC, major non-governmental human rights advocacy groups, like Minbyun–Lawyers for a Democratic Society and People's Society for Participatory Democracy, have ignored the issue. [14]

Obstetricians later emerged as a powerful voice for anti-abortion sentiment in Korea as a product of ethical and moral concerns. [15]

Much of the ensuing debate has focused on whether the government should crack down on illegal abortions, and whether the law should be modified. [10] [7] In September 2017, campaigners filed a petition on the website of Moon Jae-in, the President of South Korea, calling on the government to amend the law by permitting the sale of the abortion pill mifepristone. [9] The petition was signed by more than 235,000 people. [16] In November 2017, the office of the president announced in response that the government would review the abortion law. [17]

In late 2018, a poll released by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs revealed that 75% of women aged 15 to 44 thought of abortion law as unfair and wanted it to be revised. [18] [16] Among the respondents, 20% of women stated that they had obtained an abortion even though it was illegal. [18]

Constitutional Court ruling decriminalizing abortion (11 April 2019)

In 2018, the Constitutional Court heard a case which challenged the constitutionality of the abortion law. [19] [20] The court's ruling was delayed until court vacancies were filled. [21]

On 11 April 2019, seven out of nine judges in the Constitutional Court of Korea ruled that criminalizing abortion in South Korea is unconstitutional. The Court granted lawmakers until 31 December 2020, to revise the laws, until which time the provisions of the Korean Criminal Code would remain in effect. [22] If legislators did not successfully revise the abortion law before this deadline, the provisions in the Korean Criminal Code that criminalize abortion in South Korea would become null and void. [18] [16]

In October 2020, the government announced draft legislation that would decriminalize abortion until the 14th week of the pregnancy. In addition, abortions between the 14th and 24th week would be permitted if the pregnancy was due to rape or for social, economic, or health reasons. [23] [24] [25] [26] Members of the National Assembly also proposed revisions. However, the National Assembly did not vote on any revisions by the deadline of 31 December 2020. At this point, Article 269 and 270 of the Criminal Code became null and void. [27]

Abortion rate

Using a 2005 survey of 25 hospitals and 176 private clinics, one study estimated that 342,433 induced abortions were performed that year (about 330,000 of them illegal), which would imply an abortion rate of 29.8 abortions per 1000 women aged 15–44. The rate was higher among single women than among married women. [28] The Ministry of Health and Welfare estimated that 169,000 induced abortions were performed in 2010. Other researchers, including Park Myung-bae of Pai Chai University, have estimated numbers much higher: 500,000 [19] [29] or 1 million abortions per year. [7]

According to more recent estimates by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 241,411 abortions were performed in 2008, with a much lower rate in recent years: 23,175 in 2018, 26,985 in 2019, and 32,063 in 2020. [30]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in the United States</span> Termination of a pregnancy in the United States

Abortion is a divisive issue in the United States. The issue of abortion is prevalent in American politics and culture wars, though a majority of Americans support continued access to abortion. There are widely different abortion laws depending on state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in Canada</span> Overview of the legality and prevalence of abortions in Canada

Abortion in Canada is legal throughout pregnancy and is publicly funded as a medical procedure under the combined effects of the federal Canada Health Act and provincial health-care systems. However, access to services and resources varies by region. While some restrictions exist, Canada is one of the few nations with no criminal restrictions on abortion. Abortion is subject to provincial healthcare regulatory rules and guidelines for physicians. No provinces offer abortion on request at 24 weeks and beyond, although there are exceptions for certain medical complications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law</span> Laws that allow, prohibit, or regulate abortion

Abortion laws vary widely among countries and territories, and have changed over time. Such laws range from abortion being freely available on request, to regulation or restrictions of various kinds, to outright prohibition in all circumstances. Many countries and territories that allow abortion have gestational limits for the procedure depending on the reason; with the majority being up to 12 weeks for abortion on request, up to 24 weeks for rape, incest, or socioeconomic reasons, and more for fetal impairment or risk to the woman's health or life. As of 2022, countries that legally allow abortion on request or for socioeconomic reasons comprise about 60% of the world's population. In 2024, France became the first country to explicitly protect abortion rights in its constitution.

Abortion in Germany is decriminalized on demand during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy upon condition of mandatory counseling. The same goes later in pregnancy in cases that the pregnancy poses an important danger to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman. In the case that the abortion is because of a rape counseling is not mandatory. The woman needs to receive counseling, called Schwangerschaftskonfliktberatung, at least three days prior to the abortion and must take place at a state-approved centre, which afterwards gives the applicant a Beratungsschein.

Abortion in Brazil is a crime, with penalties of 1 to 3 years of imprisonment for the pregnant woman, and 1 to 4 years of imprisonment for the doctor or any other person who performs the abortion on someone else. In three specific situations in Brazil, induced abortion is not punishable by law: in cases of risk to woman's life; when the pregnancy is the result of rape; and if the fetus is anencephalic. In these cases, the Brazilian government provides the abortion procedure free of charge through the Sistema Único de Saúde. This does not mean that the law regards abortion in these cases as a right, but only that women who receive abortions under these circumstances, and the doctors, will not be punished. The punishment for a woman who performs an abortion on herself or consents to an abortion performed by another outside these legal exceptions is one to three years of detention. The base penalty for a third party that performs an illegal abortion with the consent of the patient, ranges from one to four years of detention, with the possibility of increase by a third if the woman comes to any physical harm, and can be doubled if she dies. Criminal penalties fixed at four years or less can be converted to non-incarceration punishments, such as community service and compulsory donation to charity.

Abortion is illegal in El Salvador. The law formerly permitted an abortion to be performed under some limited circumstances, but in 1998 all exceptions were removed when a new abortion law went into effect.

The timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting) represents formal changes and reforms regarding women's rights. The changes include actual law reforms, as well as other formal changes (e.g. reforms through new interpretations of laws by precedents). The right to vote is exempted from the timeline: for that right, see Timeline of women's suffrage. The timeline excludes ideological changes and events within feminism and antifeminism; for that, see Timeline of feminism.

Since 2021, abortion has no longer been a federal crime in Mexico. However, the criminal law in Mexico varies by state. On 7 September 2023, the Mexican Supreme Court unanimously ruled that penalising abortion is unconstitutional, setting a precedent across the whole country. Before 2019, abortion had been severely restricted outside of Mexico City, where it was legalized on-request in 2007. As of August 2023, abortion is available on request to any woman during the first twelve weeks of a pregnancy in Mexico City and the states of Oaxaca, Hidalgo, Veracruz, Coahuila, Colima, Baja California, Sinaloa, Guerrero, Baja California Sur, Quintana Roo, and Aguascalientes. However, even in states where abortion is legal, there continue to be women in pre-trial detention for murder due to spontaneous miscarriage.

This is a timeline of reproductive rights legislation, a chronological list of laws and legal decisions affecting human reproductive rights. Reproductive rights are a sub-set of human rights pertaining to issues of reproduction and reproductive health. These rights may include some or all of the following: the right to legal or safe abortion, the right to birth control, the right to access quality reproductive healthcare, and the right to education and access in order to make reproductive choices free from coercion, discrimination, and violence. Reproductive rights may also include the right to receive education about contraception and sexually transmitted infections, and freedom from coerced sterilization, abortion, and contraception, and protection from practices such as female genital mutilation (FGM).

Abortion in Japan is allowed under a term limit of 22 weeks for endangerment to the health of the pregnant woman, economic hardship, or rape. Chapter XXIX of the Penal Code of Japan makes abortion de jure illegal in the country, but exceptions to the law are broad enough that it is widely accepted and practiced. Exceptions to the prohibition of abortion are regulated by the Maternal Health Protection Law that allows approved doctors to practice abortion on a woman if the pregnancy was the result of rape or if the continuation of the pregnancy endangers the maternal health because of physical or economic reasons. Anyone trying to practice abortion without the consent of the woman will be prosecuted, including the doctors. If a woman is married, consent from her spouse is also needed to approve abortions for socioeconomic reasons, although the rule doesn't apply if she is in a broken marriage, suffering abuse, or other domestic issues. Despite the partner's consent not being necessary for unmarried women and women who were impregnated by abusive partners or through rape, many doctors and medical institutions seek a signature from the man believed to have made the woman pregnant for fear of getting into legal trouble, rights advocates say.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in Colombia</span>

Abortion in Colombia is freely available on request up to the 24th week of pregnancy, due to a ruling by the Constitutional Court on February 21, 2022. Later in pregnancy, it is only allowed in cases of risk of death to the pregnant woman, fetal malformation, or rape, according to a Constitutional Court ruling in 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law in the United States by state</span> Termination of pregnancy in states of the United States

The legality of abortion in the United States and the various restrictions imposed on the procedure vary significantly depending on the laws of each state or other jurisdiction. Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy with few exceptions, others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, while others allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictions on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counseling requirements.

The Dominican Republic is one of 24 countries in the world and one of six in Latin America that has a complete ban on abortion. This complete ban includes situations in which a pregnant person’s life is at risk.

Foeticide, or feticide, is the act of killing a fetus, or causing a miscarriage. Definitions differ between legal and medical applications, whereas in law, feticide frequently refers to a criminal offense, in medicine the term generally refers to a part of an abortion procedure in which a provider intentionally induces fetal demise to avoid the chance of an unintended live birth, or as a standalone procedure in the case of selective reduction.

Forced abortion is a form of reproductive coercion that refers to the act of compelling a woman to undergo termination of a pregnancy against her will or without explicit consent. Forced abortion may also be defined as coerced abortion, and may occur due to a variety of outside forces such as societal pressure, or due to intervention by perpetrators such as an intimate partner, parental guardian, medical practitioners, or others who may cause abortion by force, threat or coercion. It may also occur by taking advantage of a situation where a pregnant individual is unable to give consent, or when valid consent is in question due to duress. This may also include the instances when the conduct was neither justified by medical or hospital treatment, which does not include instances in which the pregnant individual is at risk of life threatening injury due to unsustainable pregnancy. Similar to other forms of reproductive coercion such as forced sterilization, forced abortion may include a physical invasion of female reproductive organs, therefore creating the possibly of causing long term threat or injury preventing viable future pregnancies. Forced abortion is considered a human rights violation by the United Nations due to its failure to comply with the human right to reproductive choice and control without coercion, discrimination, and violence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion-rights movements</span> Social movement advocating for legal access to abortion

Abortion-rights movements, also self-styled as pro-choice movements, advocate for the right to have legal access to induced abortion services including elective abortion. They seek to represent and support women who wish to terminate their pregnancy without fear of legal or social backlash. These movements are in direct opposition to anti-abortion movements.

Timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting) represents formal changes and reforms regarding women's rights. That includes actual law reforms as well as other formal changes, such as reforms through new interpretations of laws by precedents. The right to vote is exempted from the timeline: for that right, see Timeline of women's suffrage. The timeline also excludes ideological changes and events within feminism and antifeminism: for that, see Timeline of feminism.

Abortion in Georgia is legal up to the detection of embryonic cardiac-cell activity, which typically begins in the 5th or 6th week after the onset of the last menstrual period (LMP), two to three weeks after implantation, when many women are not yet aware that they are pregnant.

As of 2024, abortion is currently illegal in Indiana. It's only legal in cases involving fatal fetal abnormalities, to preserve the life and physical health of the mother, and in cases of rape or incest up to 10 weeks of pregnancy. Previously abortion in Indiana was legal up to 20 weeks; a near-total ban that was scheduled to take effect on August 1 was placed on hold due to further legal challenges, but is set to take place, after the Indiana Supreme Court denied an appeal by the ACLU, and once it certifies a previous ruling, that an abortion ban doesn't violate the state constitution. In the wake of the 2022 Dobbs Supreme Court ruling, abortion in Indiana remained legal despite Indiana lawmakers voting in favor of a near-total abortion ban on August 5, 2022. Governor Eric Holcomb signed this bill into law the same day. The new law became effective on September 15, 2022. But on September 22, 2022, Special Judge Kelsey B. Hanlon of the Monroe County Circuit Court granted a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the ban. Her ruling allows the state's previous abortion law, which allows abortions up to 20 weeks after fertilization with exceptions for rape and incest, to remain in effect.

Abortion in Ohio is legal up to the point of fetal viability. A six week ban enacted prior to the passage of November 2023 Ohio Issue 1 is being challenged in court following abortion rights being placed into the Ohio State Constitution. In November 2023, a constitutional amendment was approved by a majority of voters that enshrined access to abortion in the Ohio Constitution. Despite the constitutional amendment, the Republican leaders of Ohio have defended the six-week abortion ban in courts.

References

  1. ↑ Kim, Sunhye (2023-02-07). "From Population Control to Reproductive Justice: Decriminalization of Abortion in South Korea". Verfassungsblog.
  2. ↑ "How to make abortion rarer". The Economist. 3 December 2016. Retrieved 25 December 2017.
  3. ↑ "S Korea must end abortion ban - court". BBC News . 2019-04-11. Retrieved 2019-04-11.
  4. ↑ Case 2017-127. Text: https://ecourt.ccourt.go.kr/coelec/websquare/websquare.html?w2xPath=/ui/coelec/dta/casesrch/EP4100_M01.xml&eventno=2017%ED%97%8C%EB%B0%94127
  5. ↑ Murray, Christine; Chandran, Rina (31 December 2020). "From Poland to South Korea: 9 abortion rights hotspots in 2021". Thomson Reuters Foundation . Retrieved 1 January 2021.
  6. ↑ "Republic of Korea". Abortion Policies: A Global Review (DOC). Vol. 2. United Nations Population Division. 2002. Retrieved 25 December 2017.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Sung, Woong Kyu (1 December 2012). "Abortion in South Korea: The Law and the Reality". International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 26 (3): 278–305. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebs011.
  8. 1 2 Choe, Sang-Hun (5 January 2010). "South Korea Confronts Open Secret of Abortion". The New York Times . Retrieved 25 December 2017.
  9. 1 2 "A campaign to legalise abortion is gaining ground in South Korea". The Economist. 9 November 2017. Retrieved 25 December 2017.
  10. 1 2 Wolman, Andrew (2010). "Abortion in Korea: A Human Rights Perspective on the Current Debate Over Enforcement of the Laws Prohibiting Abortion". Journal of International Business and Law. 9 (1).
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Kim, Naryung (1999). "Breaking Free from Patriarchy: A Comparative Study of Sex Selection Abortions in Korea and the United States". Pacific Basin Law Journal. 17 (2–3).
  12. 1 2 3 Mueller, Gerhard O. W., ed. (2004). The Korean Criminal Code. The American Series of Foreign Penal Codes. Translated by Ryu, Paul. Buffalo, New York: William S. Hein & Co. Retrieved 2019-12-29.{{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kim, Hyosin; Bae, Hyun-A. (2018-01-02). "A critical assessment of abortion law and its implementation in South Korea". Asian Journal of Women's Studies. 24 (1): 71–87. doi:10.1080/12259276.2018.1427534. ISSN   1225-9276. S2CID   158960818.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "South Korea: Stop criminalization of abortion". Amnesty International. 28 October 2016. doi:10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9211-2016094 . Retrieved 29 December 2019.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. ↑ Choe, S. H. (January 10, 2010). "A Korean Doctors' Group Wants to Halt Abortions". The New York Times . ProQuest   1467516088 . Retrieved May 27, 2019.
  16. 1 2 3 "Women in South Korea Demand an End to Dangerous Abortion Ban". Time. 2019-04-10. Retrieved 2019-06-14.
  17. ↑ "South Korea to review whether or not to abolish anti-abortion law". Reuters. 26 November 2017. Retrieved 25 December 2017.
  18. 1 2 3 Seo, Yoonjung (2019-04-11). "South Korea to legalize abortion after 66-year ban". CNN. Retrieved 2019-06-14.
  19. 1 2 Rich, Motoko (13 January 2018). "Push to End South Korea Abortion Ban Gains Strength, and Signatures". The New York Times . Retrieved 15 January 2018.
  20. ↑ Lee, Claire (24 May 2018). "Abortion ban challenged at Supreme Court". The Korea Herald . Retrieved 22 December 2018.
  21. ↑ Haas, Benjamin (11 November 2018). "South Korea's nascent feminist movement turns to abortion ban". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 December 2018.
  22. ↑ "S Korea must end abortion ban - court". BBC News . 2019-04-11. Retrieved 2020-05-22.
  23. ↑ "South Korea's government is making it easier to get an abortion". The Economist . 21 November 2020. Retrieved 1 January 2021.
  24. ↑ "South Korea Partially Recognizes Reproductive Rights". Human Rights Watch . 12 October 2020. Retrieved 1 January 2021.
  25. ↑ Cha, Sangmi (7 October 2020). "South Korea proposes compromise abortion law after landmark court ruling". Reuters . Retrieved 1 January 2021.
  26. ↑ Ryall, Julian (13 October 2020). "South Korea's abortion law revision plan sparks controversy". Deutsche Welle . Retrieved 1 January 2021.
  27. ↑ "South Korea: Abortion Decriminalized since January 1, 2021". Library of Congress. Retrieved 2022-08-09.
  28. ↑ Ahn, Hyeong Sik; Seol, Hyun-Joo; Lim, Ji-Eun; Hong, Sung-hee; Lee, Sun Young; Park, Moon-Il; Kim, Soon Duck; Kim, Hai-Joong (January 2012). "Estimates of induced abortion in South Korea: Health facilities survey". Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 38 (1): 324–328. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01701.x. PMID   22136060. S2CID   205511323.
  29. ↑ McCurry, Justin (11 April 2019). "South Korean court rules abortion ban must be lifted". The Guardian . Retrieved 29 December 2019.
  30. ↑ Arin, Kim (2022-06-30). "Decriminalizing abortion did not reverse declining trend in Korea". The Korea Herald . Retrieved 2023-02-27.

Commons-logo.svg Media related to Abortion in South Korea at Wikimedia Commons

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.