Ad Fontes Media

Last updated

Ad Fontes Media, Inc.
Formation2018;6 years ago (2018)
FounderVanessa Otero
Legal statusActive
ProductsMedia Bias Chart
Website www.adfontesmedia.com

Ad Fontes Media, Inc. is a Colorado-based, media watchdog, public benefit corporation [1] primarily known for its Media Bias Chart, which rates media sources in terms of political bias and reliability. The organization was founded in 2018 by patent attorney Vanessa Otero with the goal of combating political polarization and media bias. Ad Fontes Media uses a panel of analysts across the political spectrum to evaluate articles for the Chart.

Contents

History

Vanessa Otero speaking at the Colorado Press Association convention in 2019 Vanessa Otero Speaking Photo (cropped).jpg
Vanessa Otero speaking at the Colorado Press Association convention in 2019

Ad Fontes Media has its origins in a blog called All Generalizations are False which was written by patent attorney Vanessa Otero from Denver, Colorado. Otero first published the Media Bias Chart, a graphic which helped viewers visualize media bias in the United States, on the blog. The Media Bias Chart became a viral phenomenon on the Imgur image sharing service in December 2016, [2] and Otero founded Ad Fontes Media to serve as the publisher of the chart. [3] One of Otero's reasons for creating the organization was that "many sources people consider to be 'news sources' are actually dominated by analysis and opinion pieces," and that "extreme sources play on people's worst instincts, like fear and tribalism, and take advantage of people's confirmation biases." [4] In an interview with Newsy, she stated that "If people understood that the sources they are consuming are actively making them angrier and polarizing them, then they might choose to consume less of that." [5]

In 2018, Ad Fontes successfully launched a crowdfunding campaign to improve the technology behind the chart, increase the number of analysts, and make the site's methodology more transparent. [5]

Otero chose the name "Ad Fontes" because it is Latin for "to the source"; her method is to go to a media source itself and rate its bias and reliability "by analyzing the source and its actual content." [6] [7]

Media Bias Chart

Version 4.0.1 (August 2018) Media-Bias-Chart 4.0.1 WikiMedia Commons Copy.jpg
Version 4.0.1 (August 2018)

The Media Bias Chart by Ad Fontes Media rates various media sources on two different scales: political bias (left to right) on the horizontal axis and reliability on the vertical axis. [5] [8] On the chart, sources are concentrated in an "inverted-U" shape as media sources with a neutral bias are generally reliable in their original fact reporting, while sources with an extreme bias on either side often contain factually inaccurate information and propaganda. [8] [9]

Ad Fontes is non-partisan. [10] During the September 2020 media bias project, nearly 1800 individual articles and TV news shows were rated by at least three analysts with different political views (left, right and center). There were 120 analysts, each reviewed about 370 articles and about 17 TV shows. Each analyst rated approximately three articles from each of the over 100 news sources available for viewing on the Chart. As a result, there were nearly 7,000 individual ratings. [11]

Otero sees the Media Bias Chart as an "anchor" that counteracts political polarization in news media, and aspires for Ad Fontes to become a " Consumer Reports for media ratings". [5] She compared low-quality news sources to junk food, [12] and described sources with extreme bias as "very toxic and damaging to the country". [4]

Methodology

As of 2021:

The Ad Fontes methodology consists of multi-analyst ratings of news sources along seven categories of bias and eight of reliability. Each source is rated by an equal number of politically left-leaning, politically right-leaning, and politically centrist analysts, whose scores along each dimension are averaged (after any notable score discrepancies are discussed and scores adjusted if the outlier is convinced) (Otero, 2021).

Each analyst completes a political identity assessment; all analysts hold at least a bachelor’s degree—and most hold a graduate degree—with one-third holding or in the process of obtaining a doctoral degree (Otero, 2021).

Analysts are selected by a panel of application reviewers consulting a rubric of candidate qualifications—including education, political/civic engagement, familiarity with news sources and United States government systems, reading comprehension and analytical skills, among others (Otero, 2021).

Once hired, analysts complete a minimum of 20 training hours to learn the content analysis procedure before contributing ratings to the data set (Otero, 2021). [13]

According to Natasha Strydhorst of the College of Media & Communication, Texas Tech University, the ratings system provides "a viable operationalization of audiences' media selections". However, "It does not (and cannot) measure objective media bias and reliability, but it also shares this limitation with other available measures of the phenomena." [13]

Reception

The chart has been criticized by people on the left and the right. According to Otero, "A lot of people on the left will call us neoliberal shills, and then a bunch of people that are on the right are like, 'Oh, you guys are a bunch of leftists yourselves.'" [14]

In 2018, a Columbia Journalism Review article questioned the thoroughness of the Media Bias Chart (when it was based solely on Otero's opinions) and similar initiatives, stating that "the five to 20 stories typically judged on these sites represent but a drop of mainstream news outlets' production". [15]

In 2021, an article on the Association of College and Research Libraries' blog argued that the Media Bias Chart is detrimental to media literacy efforts because it "promotes a false equivalency between left and right, lionizes a political 'center' as being without bias, and reinforces harmful perceptions about what constitutes 'news' in our media ecosystem, and is ignored by anyone that doesn't already hold a comparable view of the media landscape." [16]

News sources that were rated as "heavily biased" on the Media Bias Chart have been critical of the chart. Alex Jones, the founder of right-wing conspiracy theory site InfoWars , said in 2018 that Ad Fontes' chart represented the "dying dinosaur media's extreme liberal bias" after the chart classified InfoWars as "nonsense damaging to public discourse". [4] InfoWars responded with a chart of their own, putting themselves as "independent" and representing "freedom" while labeling news sources like the Associated Press as "tyranny" and "state-run corporate/foreign influences"; InfoWars's chart was widely criticized by journalists on Twitter. [4] [17]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fox News</span> American conservative cable news channel

The Fox News Channel (FNC), commonly known as Fox News, is an American multinational conservative news and political commentary television channel and website based in New York City. It is owned by Fox News Media, which itself is owned by the Fox Corporation. It is the most-watched cable network in the U.S., and as of 2023 generates approximately 70% of its parent company's pre-tax profit. The channel broadcasts primarily from studios at 1211 Avenue of the Americas in Midtown Manhattan. Fox News provides a service to 86 countries and territories, with international broadcasts featuring Fox Extra segments during advertising breaks.

Media bias is the bias of journalists and news producers within the mass media in the selection of many events and stories that are reported and how they are covered. The term "media bias" implies a pervasive or widespread bias contravening of the standards of journalism, rather than the perspective of an individual journalist or article. The direction and degree of media bias in various countries is widely disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom House</span> American non-profit organization

Freedom House is a non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C. It is best known for political advocacy surrounding issues of democracy, political freedom, and human rights. Freedom House was founded in October 1941, with Wendell Willkie and Eleanor Roosevelt serving as its first honorary chairpersons. Its mission is to expand and defend freedom globally, and its vision is a world where all are free. Most of the organization's funding comes from the U.S. State Department and other government grants. It also receives funds from various semi-public and private foundations, as well as individual contributions.

MSNBC is an American news-based television channel and website headquartered in New York City. It is owned by NBCUniversal — a subsidiary of Comcast — and provides news coverage and political commentary. The network produces live broadcasts for its channel from studios at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in Manhattan, New York City, and aggregates its coverage and commentary on its website, msnbc.com.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drudge Report</span> American news aggregation website

The Drudge Report is a U.S.-based news aggregation website founded by Matt Drudge, and run with the help of Charles Hurt and Daniel Halper. The site was generally regarded as a conservative publication, though its ownership and political leanings have been questioned following business model changes in mid-to-late 2019. The site consists mainly of links to news stories from other outlets about politics, entertainment, and current events; it also has links to many columnists.

Claims of media bias have increased in the United States as the two-party system has become more polarized, including claims of liberal and conservative bias. " The U.S. media has come under intense scrutiny, with analysts, politicians, and even journalists themselves accusing it of bias and sensationalism". These claims generally focus on the idea of media outlets skewing information, such as reporting news in a way that conflicts with standards of professional journalism, or promoting a political agenda through entertainment media, on bias in reporting to favor the corporate owners, and on mainstream bias, a tendency of the media to focus on certain "hot" stories and ignore news of more substance. As "Americans’ concerns about media bias deepen, even as they see it as vital for democracy." A variety of watchdog groups attempt to combat bias by fact-checking biased reporting and also unfounded claims of bias. Researchers in a variety of scholarly disciplines study media bias.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Croatian Wikipedia</span> The Croatian-language version of Wikipedia

The Croatian Wikipedia is the Croatian language version of Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, started on February 16, 2003. This version has 218,353 articles and a total of 6.8 million edits have been made. It has 307,101 registered users, out of which 517 have been active in the last 30 days, and 13 administrators. Throughout 2014, fewer than two dozen editors made more than 100 edits a month; around 150 made more than 5 edits a month. Around 750 articles are ranked as featured.

<i>Freedom in the World</i> Annual survey by Freedom House

Freedom in the World is a yearly survey and report by the U.S.-based non-governmental organization Freedom House that measures the degree of civil liberties and political rights in every nation and significant related and disputed territories around the world.

Rasmussen Reports is an American polling company founded in 2003. The company engages in political commentary and the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information. Rasmussen Reports conducts nightly tracking, at national and state levels, of elections, politics, current events, consumer confidence, business topics, and the United States president's job approval ratings. Surveys by the company are conducted using a combination of automated public opinion polling involving pre-recorded telephone inquiries and an online survey. The company generates revenue by selling advertising and subscriptions to its polling survey data.

In statistics, inter-rater reliability is the degree of agreement among independent observers who rate, code, or assess the same phenomenon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sharyl Attkisson</span> American writer, journalist, television reporter/correspondent

Sharyl Attkisson is an American journalist and television correspondent. She hosts the Sinclair Broadcast Group TV show Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson.

Nielsen Media Research (NMR) is an American firm that measures media audiences, including television, radio, theatre, films, and newspapers. Headquartered in New York City, it is best known for the Nielsen ratings, an audience measurement system of television viewership that for years has been the deciding factor in canceling or renewing television shows by television networks. As of May 2012, it is part of Nielsen Holdings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States cable news</span> News disseminated through cable television networks

Cable news channels are television networks devoted to television news broadcasts, with the name deriving from the proliferation of such networks during the 1980s with the advent of cable television.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PolitiFact</span> American nonprofit fact-checking website

PolitiFact.com is an American nonprofit project operated by the Poynter Institute in St. Petersburg, Florida, with offices there and in Washington, D.C. It began in 2007 as a project of the Tampa Bay Times, with reporters and editors from the newspaper and its affiliated news media partners reporting on the accuracy of statements made by elected officials, candidates, their staffs, lobbyists, interest groups and others involved in U.S. politics. Its journalists select original statements to evaluate and then publish their findings on the PolitiFact.com website, where each statement receives a "Truth-O-Meter" rating. The ratings range from "True" for statements the journalists deem as accurate to "Pants on Fire" for claims the journalists deem as "not accurate and makes a ridiculous claim".

Mainstreet Research is a Canadian market research and polling firm with headquarters in Toronto, and offices in Montreal and Ottawa. The company was founded in 2010 by Quito Maggi, who currently serves as its president.

Perceived ideological bias on Wikipedia, especially on its English-language edition, has been the subject of academic analysis and public criticism of the project. Questions relate to whether its content is biased due to the political, religious, or other ideologies its volunteer editors may adhere to. These all draw concerns as to the possible effects this may have on the encyclopedia's reliability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Media Bias/Fact Check</span> American website

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by Dave M. Van Zandt. MBFC uses an explicit methodology to rate media outlets. It considers four main categories and multiple subcategories in assessing the "Political bias" and "Factual Reporting" of each source.

NewsGuard is a rating system for news and information websites. It is accessible via browser extensions and mobile apps. NewsGuard Technologies Inc., the company behind the tool, also provides services such as misinformation tracking and brand safety for advertisers, search engines, social media platforms, cybersecurity firms, and government agencies.

Our.News was a fact-checking platform that provided "nutritional labels" combining automated and user-assigned scores to rate the reliability of news articles.

AllSides Technologies Inc., is an American-based company that estimates the perceived political bias of content on online written news outlets, and then presents different versions of similar news stories from sources AllSides rates as being on the political right, left, and center, with a mission to show readers news outside their filter bubble and expose media bias. AllSides is the brainchild of John Gable who has been the company's CEO and primary owner since its first iteration.

References

  1. ↑ Lin, Hause; Lasser, Jana; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Cole, Rocky; Gully, Andrew; Rand, David G; Pennycook, Gordon (September 5, 2023). "High level of correspondence across different news domain quality rating sets". PNAS Nexus. 2 (9): pgad286. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad286. PMC   10500312 . PMID   37719749.
  2. ↑ Little, Hannah Byrd (September–October 2018). "Media Literacy: A Moving Target" (PDF). Knowledge Quest. American Association of School Librarians. 48 (1): 18–20. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved April 24, 2020.
  3. ↑ Peck, Andrea (June 2019). "A Boulder Lawyer Wants to Help You Become a Smarter News Consumer". 5280 . Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved May 14, 2020.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Langlois, Shawn (April 21, 2018). "How biased is your news source? You probably won't agree with this chart". MarketWatch . Retrieved March 30, 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Thomas, Evan (December 28, 2018). "This Map Can Help Navigate The Partisan Media Landscape". Newsy . Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2020.
  6. ↑ "The Media Bias Chart®," ad fontes media Inc., 2022. Retrieved 14 May 2022.
  7. ↑ Sheridan, Jake. "Should you trust media bias charts?" Poynter.org, 2 Nov 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2022.
  8. 1 2 "Intro to the Media Bias Chart". Ad Fontes Media. Retrieved March 30, 2020.
  9. ↑ Kreidler, Marc (March 19, 2019). "Who Are More Biased: Liberals or Conservatives?". Skeptical Inquirer . Retrieved April 24, 2020.
  10. ↑ Halpern, Sue (December 19, 2018). "The Search for Anti-Conservative Bias on Google". The New Yorker . Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2020.
  11. ↑ "Methodology". Ad Fontes Media. Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved September 12, 2020.
  12. ↑ Jojola, Jeremy (February 10, 2020). "We set up 3 laptops with 3 different newsfeeds. Here's what we've seen so far". 9 News . Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved March 31, 2020.
  13. 1 2 Strydhorst, Natasha; Morales-Riech, Javier; Landrum, Asheley R (October 10, 2023). "Exploring partisans' biased and unreliable media consumption and their misinformed health-related beliefs" (PDF). Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. 4 (5). Retrieved December 1, 2023.
  14. ↑ Sheridan, Jake (October 4, 2021). "Should you trust media bias charts?". Poynter . Archived from the original on February 3, 2021. Retrieved October 30, 2021.
  15. ↑ Wilner, Tamar (January 9, 2018). "We can probably measure media bias. But do we want to?". Columbia Journalism Review . Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved March 31, 2020. A similar effort is "The Media Bias Chart," or simply, "The Chart." Created by Colorado patent attorney Vanessa Otero, the chart has gone through several methodological iterations, but currently is based on her evaluation of outlets' stories on dimensions of veracity, fairness, and expression.
  16. ↑ Benjes-Small, Candice and Nathan Elwood (2021). "Complex or clickbait: The problematic Media Bias Chart". ACRLog. Archived from the original on February 23, 2021.
  17. ↑ Tani, Maxwell (December 14, 2016). "Outlandish InfoWars chart attempts to classify media outlets by how 'tyrannical' or 'independent' they are". Business Insider . Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.