Apocalypse of Pseudo-Ezra

Last updated
The start of the Apocalypse (indicated by red ink) in the manuscript Mingana 11 Birmingham, Cadbury Research Library, Mingana Syriac 11, folio 102r.jpg
The start of the Apocalypse (indicated by red ink) in the manuscript Mingana 11

The Apocalypse of Pseudo-Ezra is a set of visions of the end times composed in the Syriac language sometime between the 7th and 12th centuries. It is a pseudepigraphon falsely attributed to Ezra. It is a short text of about seven manuscript pages. It recapitulates history in the form of prophecy using obscure animal imagery. Written to console Christians living under Islamic rule, it predicts the end of such rule in the Near East.

Contents

The actual author of the text is anonymous. As the text lacks theological specifics, it cannot be determined to which confession the author belonged. The text itself is often seen as the work of an editor stitching together two preexisting apocalypses, but there is no scholarly agreement on the date of the final text. The Syriac text is preserved in at least sixteen manuscripts, all quite late. Additionally, there is an Arabic recension preserved in a single late manuscript. The Syriac version has been published several times and translated into English.

Title and genre

The title supplied to the Apocalypse by the scribes is some variant of "the question that Ezra asked when he was in the desert with his disciple", with Ezra often qualified as "the scribe" and the disciple named as "Carpus". [1] The full Syriac title is Shēltā d-shēl ʿĀzrā sāprā kad hwā b-madbrā w-talmideh ʿameh da-shmeh Qarpus. [2] Modern convention is to call the work the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Ezra, [2] [3] the Syriac Apocalypse of Ezra [4] [5] or the Syriac Esdras Apocalypse. [6] Richard Gottheil calls it the Revelation of Ezra. [7]

The work is classified as an apocalypse because it is a revelation about the future. It is firmly rooted in this world, however, and has nothing to say about heaven or hell. [8] It may be classified with the Syriac historical apocalypses that were popular in the first century of Islam, the purpose of which was to "console Christians who had become the subjects of a new empire and religion." [9] Michael Stone classifies it as one of the "political" Ezra apocalypses, along with the Ethiopic Apocalypse of Ezra . [10] The scribal title does not indicate the work as an apocalypse or vision. [1] The explicit or superscription, however, identifies the work as "the vision of Ezra the scribe". [11] The fuller form of the explicit in Syriac reads Ḥezwā da-ḥzā ʿĀzrā sāprā ʿal malkutā d-Ishmaʿlāyē ("the vision of Ezra the Scribe which he saw concerning the kingdom of the Ishmaelites"). [2] The title and the explicit are rubricated (i.e., in red ink) in the manuscript Mingana 11. [12]

Synopsis

The Apocalypse takes up only about seven pages in the manuscripts. [2] It begins in the third person, describing how Ezra asked God to reveal what will happen in "the end times of the Ishmaelites", [1] a Christian term for Arabs or Muslims. [4] The text then switches to the first person as Ezra describes what he read and saw in a series of visions. [4] He first describes to his disciple Carpus (Qarpos) how he had a vision in which an angel in the form of a young man in white handed him a scroll containing the answer to his question. [13] There rest of text can be divided into two sets of visions. [14] [15] The visions themselves consist of "very obscure" [14] and "bewildering" animal imagery. [15]

First part

In the first vision, a serpent with twelve horns on its head and nine smaller horns on its tail comes up from the desert to devour all of creation. An angel dressed in flames tears off its twelve horns, fulfililng the "prophecy of Moses" ( Genesis 17:20). A great horn then springs up from the tail, having two small horns of its own. An eagle from the south then devours all the horns, but a whirlwind tears off its two talons. [16]

A viper then comes from the east, poisoning everything "up to the border of the Promise" (probably the Promised Land). There is an earthquake and a voice from heaven calls for the release of "those four kings who are bound on the great river Euphrates, those who are prepared to destroy one out of three people." They are released. Ravens from the east attack the viper, which flees to Egypt with its two "chicks". At the behest of the younger chick, the lion cub sends for the leopard of the south to protect the vipers. [17]

Second part

A bull with three horns, who is the king of the ravens, is ravaging the land of the west. He will make war on the lion cub "and much blood will be shed between the two mighty men" before the bull contends with "the seven hills and the great city of Constantine." The youngest viper will then lead an army from Tarqono (possibly Trachonitis [18] or Thrace [19] ) to ravage Damascus while his father leads an army of the Kushites to ravage Egypt. [20]

The lion cub will ravage the land of the ravens from Antioch to the east. A leopard leading a people like locusts out of the north meets the lion cub at the Euphrates to march on Persia. The bull meets them and the lion cub breaks off its horns. The ravens flee and their land is utterly destroyed "until they fall and die, without diseases or illnesses, from the fear that rules over them." The lion cub then subjects the Promised Land to tribute, builds a wall around Phoenicia, destroys Damascus, enters Jerusalem in triumph and returns to his royal city. [21]

There follows a lull of three and a half weeks before a "mighty man will come out of the south with a great nation" to reign in peace over the Promised Land for three years and seven months. After this, "the four winds of heaven will be stirred up" and Earth will descend into civil war. God sends "a fearsome angel [to] take hold of the point of the destroying sword" and end the tribulation. [22]

Then "the children of the north ... will go out from the house of Gog and Magog" to commit new atrocities. Two tribes of Ishmaelites and "those who have become sooty at the base of the mountain of the south" go up to Jerusalem and are destroyed by the archangel Michael. "At that time a year is like a month, a month like a week, a week like a day, and a day like an hour." The false messiah will then appear. He will kill Enoch and Elijah on the altar. Finally, angels will cast the Son of Perdition into Gehenna. [23]

Interpretation

The text is usually treated as mostly vaticinium ex eventu (prophecy after the fact), with scholars seeking to identify the specifics of the visions with historical events that came before. [24] It does, however, contain genuine prophecy (predictions) about the future. [8]

According to Robert Hoyland, the first part "is too terse to be sure of its meaning." [25] Michael Stone likens it to the four empires of Daniel. [26] Wilhelm Bousset offers a scheme based on the Arabic Apocalypse of Peter , which he thought represented a version of the source text for the first part. [27] He identifies the animals with a sequence of Islamic dynasties. The serpent is the Umayyads, the eagle the Abbasids, the viper the Fatimids and the four kings the various Turk dynasties. The lion cub represents the Crusaders. [25] [24] The geography of Pseudo-Ezra, however, does not match the supposed source and is historically inaccurate. The historical Fatimids are associated with Egypt (not the east) and the Abbasids with the east (not south). [27] Likewise, the Crusaders never took Damascus, although this may reflect an actual prediction of the author. [25]

According to Bousset and Hoyland, the second part recounts the Roman–Sasanian War of 602–628. The bull is the Sasanian king Khosrow II, the lion cub the Roman emperor Heraclius and the leopard the latter's Turkish allies. On this view, the text is not a unity, but a compilation, with the latter part having been composed first and the first part later grafted onto it. [25] [27] The bull is not mentioned in the first part. The reference to him as "king of the ravens" suggests an attempt to knit together two independent texts. [28] In the first part, the native Syriac word for "leopard" is used, but in the second part the word translated "leopard" is a Greek borrowing. [29]

The end of the Apocalypse (indicated by red ink) in the manuscript Mingana 11 Birmingham, Cadbury Research Library, Mingana Syriac 11, folio 105v.jpg
The end of the Apocalypse (indicated by red ink) in the manuscript Mingana 11

Lisbeth Fried, treating the text as a unitary composition, regards the bull as the Ishmaelites and the lion cub as the Messiah. The "seven hills" probably refers to the Seven Hills of Rome and the "great city of Constantine" is the city of Constantinople. Those lands which submitted to the Arabs in the 7th century, from Egypt to the Euphrates, are set for destruction, with the cities of Damascus and Antioch singled out. [4]

Sources and influences

The basic setting of the Apocalypse comes from 4 Ezra . [8] The latter was "the oldest and most popular of Ezra pseudepigrapha" and its portrayal of Ezra, rather than that of the biblical Book of Ezra , is the basis for the Syriac Apocalypse. [30] The Apocalypse draws heavily on the Book of Revelation and the Book of Daniel , [2] [8] [25] but also the four canonical Gospels, [2] [31] the Book of Ezekiel , [8] and the epistles of Romans and 2 Thessalonians . [31] The biblical language used is that of the standard Syriac bible, the Peshitta. [8]

The Apocalypse of Pseudo-Ezra was influenced, directly or indirectly, by the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius . Pseudo-Methodian materials include the probable Last Roman Emperor motif and the influence of legends about Alexander the Great on the understanding of Gog and Magog. [32] Three distinctive features of the Arabic Apocalypse of Peter are also present in some form in Pseudo-Ezra: a messianic lion cub, twelve kings followed by nine little kings and the rebuilding of the walls of Phoenicia. There are other less distinctive commonalities. [33] The textual relationship between the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Ezra and the Apocalypse of Peter is unclear because the latter has not been comprehensively studied. It may be that the latter is based on the former. [34]

Date

There is no agreement among scholars on the date of the Apocalypse. [14] The first modern scholar to take note of it, Giuseppe Simone Assemani (1687–1768), identified it as pseudonymous because it refers to Constantinople, a name that only came into usage after AD 324. [11] The earliest surviving manuscript is no earlier than the late 17th century. [35] Between these dates, Assemani placed its composition shortly after the fall of Constantinople (1453). [25] [24]

In an 1887 study, Ludwig Iselin  [ pl ] proposed that the Apocalypse is a Christian revision of an originally Jewish work that drew on an Aramaic source also used by the author of the biblical Revelation. His proposals have not gained acceptance. [36] In 1894, Jean-Baptiste Chabot argued that the Apocalypse is an original Christian composition of the 7th or 8th century, written in response to the rise of Islam. [37] In 1896, Bousset, settled on a date after the First Crusade (1095–1099). [38]

Robert Hoyland believes that it is the work of a redactor who combined two apocalypses into a single work using Revelation and Daniel to plug gaps. [25] Like Bousset, Hoyland accepts a late date for the final redaction, situating it in the context of the Fatimid–Seljuk wars of the late 11th century or the Fatimid–Ayyubid wars of the late 12th century. [39] He argues that a focus on Egypt and the use of Revelation both point to a late rather than early medieval date. [25] Revelation is not accepted as canonical in the Syriac churches and was not part of the original Peshitta, but it was included in the Harklean version and would have been available by the late 7th century. [40] Both Hoyland and Bousset, accept an early 7th-century date for the original apocalypse on which the second part is based. [41]

Muriel Debié, on the other hand, puts forward arguments in favour of Chabot's dating, suggesting that the genre of the text belongs to the first century of Islam and "the allusion to attacks on Constantinople might suggest a date after one of the unsuccessful sieges", either the siege of 669 or the siege of 717. [42] Lisbeth Fried also prefers a date "in the last quarter of the seventh century." [8] Sergey Minov expresses "little doubt" that it dates from "the very beginning of the Muslim era, perhaps in the early eighth century." [43]

Laura Estes suggests the first siege of Constantinople (669/674) as the earliest possible date. [24] If the Arabic Apocalypse of Peter made use of Pseudo-Ezra as a source, then the latter was written no later than 1176–1177, the date of the earliest known copy of the Arabic Apocalypse. [44]

Authorship and provenance

Modern scholarship has always regarded the connection of the Apocalypse to Ezra as spurious. [11] The actual author is anonymous. [2] He is conventionally known as Pseudo-Ezra. [3] [15] He may be regarded as a mere redactor or editor of preexisting texts, as by Iselin and Hoyland. [25] Although the work is a pseudepigraphon, [30] [45] it was explicitly excluded as Old Testament pseudepigrapha by the editors of The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha series for being "far removed from the Old Testament in date and character." [46]

The original language of the Apocalypse is Syriac. [2] All known manuscripts were copied in East Syriac script and originate in northern Iraq, between Zawita and Mosul. [35] This suggests that the work itself was composed in an East Syriac context, i.e., by members of the Church of the East. [2] [35] The work is devoid of Christian doctrinal statements that would implicate any particular confession. [47] Internal evidence has been held to suggest a Melkite or Miaphysite provenance, depending on whether the portrayal of the lion cub (i.e., the Roman emperor) is taken as positive or negative. [48] [49] The prominence of Egypt and Ethiopia could also suggest a Miaphysite connection. [48]

Manuscripts

There are sixteen manuscripts that contain the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Ezra. [50] Listed from oldest to latest, those in western collections are:

In addition, there are several manuscripts last known to have been in eastern collections. Addai Scher catalogued Seert 113, copied in the 18th century and last known to have been in the library of the Chaldean Catholic Eparchy of Seert. [61] Jacques-Marie Vosté  [ fr ] catalogued six manuscripts containing the Apocalypse. MS 12 in the library of the Chaldean Catholic Archeparchy of Kirkuk is Vosté 9 (=Haddad 15), copied near Alqosh in April 1791 by Abdisho bar Iaunan. [61] [5] The other five manuscripts were formerly of the monastery of Notre-Dame-des-Semences and may have been moved to the Chaldean monastery in Baghdad. All of these were copied in Alqosh. They are numbered 38–42:

Translations and editions

Start of the Arabic recension in its only known copy Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France, Arabe 150, folio 14r.png
Start of the Arabic recension in its only known copy

Arabic version

There is an Arabic recension of the Apocalypse in which the visions are ascribed to Daniel, who relays them to his disciple, Ezra. [1] It is preserved in a single manuscript copied in 1606, now in Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Ar. 150 (olim 107). [64] It is shorter than the Syriac text, essentially containing only the horned serpent vision, which probably circulated independently. [65] [66] This story, however, is much embellished, [7] making the Arabic text "one of the longest of the apocryphal Daniel apocalypses." [67]

The date of the Arabic version is uncertain. It has the disjointed structure of a composite work. Gerbern Oegema dates it to the period of the Crusades. [67] It is untitled in the manuscript, but Lorenzo DiTommaso adopts the title The Vision of Daniel as Related to Ezra, His Pupil, since the text describes what Daniel saw as a "vision". Most earlier studies adopt some version of Arabic Daniel Apocalypse, an ambiguous title since the publication of another Arabic apocalypse attributed to Daniel in 2002. [68] Gottheil published a partial edition of the Arabic text with a translation into English in 1887. [69] In 1904, Frédéric Macler transcribed the entire text and translated it into French. [70]

Modern editions

In 1886, Isaac Hall published the first translation of the Apocalypse into a modern European language, an English translation based on the manuscript UTS 23, which had been copied in 1884 from a now lost manuscript dated 1756 in Rabban Hormizd Monastery. [71] Later that year, Friedrich Baethgen published an edition and German translation of the Apocalypse based on the manuscript Sachau 101. [72] In 1896, Chabot published a French translation based on the manuscript BnF 326. [37]

Ten of the manuscripts of the Apocalypse are connected with Rabban Hormizd Monastery, possibly copied during the construction of the nearby Notre-Dame-des-Semences in preparation for the transfer of the monastery's manuscripts. [73] In all but two manuscripts, it is copied alongside the Cave of Treasures . It may have been perceived as an update that brought the Cave's theocentric interpretation of history down to the time of its author. [74]

For her master's thesis at Abilene Christian University, Laura Estes produced a critical edition of the Syriac text and an English translation based on five manuscripts (Mingana 11, BL 25875, Sachau 131, UTS 23, BnF 326). [75]

There is no standard versification of the text. Baethgen and Estes number their sections differently, while Chabot numbered his lines. [76]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 Estes 2016, p. 3.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Debié 2008, p. 239.
  3. 1 2 Estes 2016, p. 1.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Fried 2014, p. 112.
  5. 1 2 DiTommaso 2018, p. 302.
  6. ↑ Stone 1982, p. 3.
  7. 1 2 Gottheil 1887, p. 14.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fried 2014, p. 113.
  9. ↑ Debié 2008, pp. 240–241.
  10. ↑ Stone 1982, p. 4.
  11. 1 2 3 Estes 2016, p. 15.
  12. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 40.
  13. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 54–55.
  14. 1 2 3 Debié 2008, p. 240.
  15. 1 2 3 Hoyland 1997, p. 276.
  16. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 55–56.
  17. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 56–57.
  18. ↑ Hall 1886, p. 539.
  19. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 58.
  20. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 57–58.
  21. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 58–60.
  22. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 60–61.
  23. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 61–62.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Estes 2016, p. 31.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hoyland 1997, p. 278.
  26. ↑ Stone 1983, p. 563.
  27. 1 2 3 Bousset 1896, pp. 75–76.
  28. ↑ Bousset 1896, p. 76.
  29. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 57.
  30. 1 2 Bauckham 2013, pp. 510–511.
  31. 1 2 See the notes to the translation at Estes 2016 , pp. 54–63.
  32. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 32–33.
  33. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 34–35.
  34. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 35–36.
  35. 1 2 3 Estes 2016, p. 28.
  36. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 16–17.
  37. 1 2 Estes 2016, p. 17.
  38. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 18.
  39. ↑ Hoyland 1997 , p. 278: "the contest between the Fatimids and Seljuk or Mamluk Turks in the late eleventh and late twelfth centuries respectively." Debié 2008 , p. 240, when mentioning Hoyland's dating, refers to "the 12th–13th centuries".
  40. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 33–34.
  41. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 32.
  42. ↑ Debié 2008 , p. 240. The date of the first siege is debated. Estes 2016 , p. 31, accepts a date of 674.
  43. 1 2 Minov 2019, p. 117.
  44. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 36–37.
  45. ↑ DiTommaso 2018 , p. 302, calls the Arabic recension "epi-pseudepigrapha".
  46. ↑ Charlesworth 1983, p. xxvi.
  47. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 28–29.
  48. 1 2 Estes 2016, p. 29.
  49. ↑ Hoyland 1997, p. 277.
  50. ↑ Estes 2016 , p. 19, lists fifteen. Minov 2019 , p. 117, says "seventeen", but lists sixteen.
  51. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 23–24.
  52. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 19–20.
  53. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 25.
  54. 1 2 3 4 Debié 2008, p. 241.
  55. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 20–21.
  56. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 25–26.
  57. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 21–22.
  58. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 22–23.
  59. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 22.
  60. ↑ Stone 1982, p. 4n.
  61. 1 2 Estes 2016, p. 26.
  62. 1 2 3 Estes 2016, p. 27.
  63. 1 2 Estes 2016, pp. 27–28.
  64. ↑ DiTommaso 2005, p. 176.
  65. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 3–5.
  66. ↑ DiTommaso 2018, pp. 302–303.
  67. 1 2 DiTommaso 2005, p. 177.
  68. ↑ DiTommaso 2005, pp. 174–175.
  69. ↑ Gottheil 1887, pp. 15–17.
  70. ↑ Macler 1904.
  71. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 15–16.
  72. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 16.
  73. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 29–30.
  74. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 30.
  75. ↑ Estes 2016, p. 19.
  76. ↑ Estes 2016, pp. 39–40.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Book of Jubilees</span> Ancient Jewish religious work of 50 chapters

The Book of Jubilees, sometimes called Lesser Genesis or Leptogenesis, is an ancient Jewish apocryphal text of 50 chapters, considered canonical by the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church as well as Beta Israel, where it is known as the Book of Division. Jubilees is considered one of the pseudepigrapha by the Eastern Orthodox, Catholic, and Protestant churches. Apart from the Beta Israel community, the book is not considered canonical within any of the denominations of Judaism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pseudepigrapha</span> Falsely attributed works

Pseudepigrapha are falsely attributed works, texts whose claimed author is not the true author, or a work whose real author attributed it to a figure of the past. The name of the author to whom the work is falsely attributed is often prefixed with the particle "pseudo-", such as for example "pseudo-Aristotle" or "pseudo-Dionysius": these terms refer to the anonymous authors of works falsely attributed to Aristotle and Dionysius the Areopagite, respectively.

The Testament of Adam is a Christian work of Old Testament pseudepigrapha that dates from the 2nd to 5th centuries AD in origin, perhaps composed within the Christian communities of Syria. It purports to relate the final words of Adam to his son Seth; Seth records the Testament and then buries the account in the legendary Cave of Treasures. Adam speaks of prayer and which parts of Creation praise God each hour of the day; he then prophesies both the coming of the Messiah and the Great Flood; and finally, a description of the celestial hierarchy of angels is given.

Pseudo-Philo is the name commonly used for the unknown, anonymous author of the Biblical Antiquities. This text is also commonly known today under the Latin title Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum, a title that is not found in the Latin manuscripts. Although probably originally written in Hebrew, it is preserved today only through a Latin translation found in 18 complete and 3 fragmentary manuscripts that date between the eleventh and fifteenth centuries CE. In addition, material paralleling that in the Biblical Antiquities is also found in the Chronicles of Jerahmeel, a 14th-century Hebrew composition. The Latin text of the Biblical Antiquities circulated alongside Latin translations of the authentic writings of Philo of Alexandria. Scholars have long recognized the pseudonymous character of the text now known as the Biblical Antiquities. Primary in this regard is a vastly differing approach to and use of the Jewish scriptures. For the sake of convenience, scholars continue to follow the lead of Leopold Cohn in calling the unknown author "Pseudo-Philo".

The Clementine literature is a late antique third-century Christiance romance or "novel" containing a fictitious account of the conversion of Clement of Rome to Christianity, his subsequent life and travels with the apostle Peter and an account of how they became traveling companions, Peter's discourses, and finally Clement's family history and eventual reunion with his family. To reflect the pseudonymous nature of the authorship, the author is sometimes referred to as Pseudo-Clement. In all likelihood, the original text went by the name of Periodoi Petrou or Circuits of Peter; sometimes historians refer to it as the "Basic Writing" or "Grundschrift".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2 Esdras</span> Apocalyptic appendix to Vulgate (70-218 CE)

2 Esdras is an apocalyptic book in some English versions of the Bible. Tradition ascribes it to Ezra, a scribe and priest of the fifth century BC, whom the book identifies with the sixth-century figure Shealtiel.

The name "Esdras" is found in the title of four texts attributed to, or associated with, the prophet Ezra. The naming convention of the four books of Esdras differs between church traditions; and has changed over time.

<i>Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius</i> 7th-century Syriac Christian text

Written in Syriac in the late seventh century, the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius shaped and influenced Christian eschatological thinking in the Middle Ages. Falsely attributed to Methodius of Olympus, a fourth century Church Father, the work attempts to make sense of the Islamic conquest of the Near East.

<i>Joseph and Aseneth</i> 1st-century Christian text in Greek

Joseph and Asenath is a narrative that dates from between 200 BCE and 200 CE. It concerns the Hebrew patriarch Joseph and his marriage to Asenath, expanding the fleeting mentions of their relationship in the Book of Genesis. The text was translated widely, including into Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Early Modern German, Latin, Middle English, Old French, Romanian, Serbian and Syriac.

Psalms 152 to 155 are additional Psalms found in two Syriac biblical manuscripts to date and several manuscripts of Elijah of Anbar's "Book of Discipline", first identified by the orientalist librarian Giuseppe Simone Assemani in 1759. Together with Psalm 151 they are also called the Five Apocryphal Psalms of David or the "Five Syriac Psalms".

The Cave of Treasures, sometimes referred to simply as The Treasure, is an apocryphal and pseudoepigraphical work, that contains various narratives related to the Christian Bible. It was written in the Syriac language, approximately at the end of the 6th, or at the beginning of the 7th century. Its authorship was traditionally attributed to Ephrem of Edessa, but modern scholarly analyses have shown that the true author was some other person, who also lived in Upper Mesopotamia, but much later.

2 Baruch is a Jewish pseudepigraphical text thought to have been written in the late 1st century CE or early 2nd century CE, after the destruction of the Temple in CE 70. It is attributed to the biblical figure Baruch ben Neriah and so is associated with the Old Testament, but not regarded as scripture by Jews or by most Christian groups. It is included in some editions of the Peshitta, and is part of the Bible in the Syriac Orthodox tradition. It has 87 sections (chapters).

<i>Seeing Islam as Others Saw It</i> Book by Robert G. Hoyland

Seeing Islam As Others Saw It: A Survey and Evaluation of Christian, Jewish and Zoroastrian Writings on Early Islam from the Studies in Late Antiquity and Early Islam series is a book by scholar of the Middle East Robert G. Hoyland.

Thomas the Presbyter was a Syriac Orthodox priest from the vicinity of Reshaina in Upper Mesopotamia who wrote the Syriac Chronicle of 640, which is also known by many other names.

The Greek Apocalypse of Daniel is a Christian pseudepigraphic text attributed to the Biblical Daniel and so associated with the Hebrew Bible. No Jewish or Christian groups regard this text as canonical or as authoritative scripture. The canonical Book of Daniel has much apocalyptic imagery, and this apocalyptic-style text deals with a similar subject, describing one particular vision of Daniel regarding the appearance and activities of the Antichrist before the Day of Judgement.

The Apocalypse of Peter or Vision of Peter, also known as the Book of the Rolls and other titles, is a Miaphysite Christian work probably written in the 10th century; the late 9th century and 11th century are also considered plausible. Around 40 manuscripts of it have been preserved and found. It is pseudepigraphically attributed to Clement of Rome, relating a vision experienced by the Apostle Peter of the resurrected Jesus; the actual author is unknown. The work was originally written in Arabic; many Ethiopic manuscripts exist as well, with the reworked Ethiopic version in the work Clement along with other stories of Clementine literature.

<i>Ethiopic Apocalypse of Ezra</i> Apocalypse written in GeĘżez (Ethiopic)

The Ethiopic Apocalypse of Ezra, also called the Falasha Apocalypse of Ezra, is an apocalypse written in Geʿez (Ethiopic) that circulated among the Beta Israel (Falasha) and foretold the divine destruction of Islam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kalandologion</span>

A kalandologion is a type of omen text that purports to predict the effects of the beginning of the year falling on a certain day of the week or in a certain sign of the zodiac. The predictions are meteorological, agricultural, epidemiological, social and political. Kalandologia are found in Greek, Syriac, Mandaic, Ethiopic, Latin, Coptic and Arabic. Before the end of the Middle Ages versions had appeared in many western vernaculars.

The Song of Alexander is a Christian Syriac text written between the 6th and 7th centuries AD concerning legends about Alexander the Great. It had been falsely attributed nearly unanimously in the manuscript tradition to Jacob of Serugh (451–521), and for this reason, the author is sometimes referred to as Pseudo-Jacob. It is also presently thought to have been written closely after and have been influenced by the Syriac Alexander Legend, and so its date is closely tied to when the latter is dated.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.