Archaeology of religion and ritual

Last updated

The archaeology of religion and ritual is a growing field of study within archaeology that applies ideas from religious studies, theory and methods, anthropological theory, and archaeological and historical methods and theories to the study of religion and ritual in past human societies from a material perspective.

Contents

Definitions

Religion may be defined as "a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs," [1] whereas ritual is "an established or prescribed procedure for a religious or other rite." [2] Archaeologists may study the material traces of religious ritual (for example, the ritual destruction of ceramic vessels during the Aztec New Fire ceremony [3] ) or the material correlates of religion as a totalized worldview (for example, Elizabeth Kyder-Reid's study of the Southern Redemptorists’ reconfiguration of landscape and artifacts to reflect their ideals of community and poverty in material form [4] ).

As in religious studies and the Anthropology of religion, many archaeologists differentiate between "world religions," and "traditional" or "indigenous religions." "World religions" are defined by Bowie (2000: 26) [5] as:

  1. Based on written scriptures.
  2. Has a notion of salvation, often from outside.
  3. Universal, or potentially universal.
  4. Can subsume or supplant primal religions.
  5. Often forms a separate sphere of activity.

while indigenous religions are defined as:

  1. Oral, or if literate, lacks written/formal scriptures and creeds.
  2. ‘This worldly’.
  3. Confined to a single language or ethnic group.
  4. Form basis from which world religions have developed.
  5. Religious and social life are inseparable. [5]

However, Timothy Insoll (2004: 9) [6] has argued that these categorizations arise from a much-critiqued neo-evolutionary perspective. Strict dichotomies of religious forms may also contribute to skewing research toward state religions, leaving household religious practice, and the relationships between these, under-investigated (a trend noted by Elson and Smith, 2001 [7] ). Insoll (2004:9) argues that archaeologists may contribute to blurring the boundaries of world and indigenous religions.

The archaeology of religion also incorporates related anthropological or religious concepts and terms such as magic, tradition, symbolism, and the sacred.

Theory

Anthropology of religion

Theory within the archaeology of religion borrows heavily from the Anthropology of religion, which encompasses a broad range of perspectives. These include: Émile Durkheim's functionalist understanding of religion as serving to separate the sacred and the profane; [8] Karl Marx's idea of religion as "the opium of the masses" or a false consciousness, [9] Clifford Geertz's loose definition of religion as a "system of symbols" that orders the world, [10] Victor Turner's work on ritual, including rites of passage and liminality, [11] Max Weber's religious types [12] and thoughts on the relationship between economics and religion; [13] Claude Lévi-Strauss’ structuralist understandings of totemism and myth; [14] and Mary Douglas’ idea of the division of "purity and danger". [15]

Religion, identity, and practice

Archaeological studies of religion increasingly recognize religion as an organizing principle in social life, rather than as a separate sphere of activity. They include religion as an axis of identity that structures social life and personal experience. Therefore, entire artifact assemblages (rather than specifically "religious" artifacts, such as rosary beads) can be interpreted according to the ways that they simultaneously create, display, and constrain notions of self according to religious ideas. For example, John Chenoweth (2009) [16] interpreted ceramic assemblages and burials according to Quaker ideals of plainness and modesty.

Because social identity is both imposed and negotiated through social practice, including material practice, archaeologies of religion increasingly incorporate practice-based theory. Building upon Anthony Giddens’ idea of structuration [17] and Pierre Bourdieu's ideas of both practice [18] and cultural capital, [19] theories of material practice posit that people use material goods to negotiate their places within social structures. Examples of the archaeological interpretation of religion and ritual as part of social negotiation, transformation or reinforcement include Chenoweth's work on Quaker religious practice, [16] Kyder-Reid's work on the Southern Redemptorists, [4] and Timothy Pauketat's work on feasting in Cahokia (Pauketat et al., 2002 [20] ).

Religion, power, and inequality

Because religion and political power are often intertwined [21] [22] particularly in early states, the archaeology of religion may also engage theories of power and inequality. John Janusek's study of Tiwanaku religion, for example, explored the ways that religion served to integrate societies within the Andean state. [23] Colonial regimes frequently justified expansion through a commitment to religious conversion; archaeologies of coloniality may therefore intersect with the archaeology of religion. James Delle's 2001 article on missions and landscape in Jamaica [24] and Barbara Voss’ work on missions, sexuality and empire [25] demonstrate how religion has intersected with colonial regimes.

Historical method and theory

Historical archaeologists have made major contributions to the understanding of the religion and ritual of peoples who have remained underrepresented (or misrepresented) in the historical record, such as colonized peoples, indigenous peoples, and enslaved peoples. Mandatory religious conversion was common in many colonial situations (e.g. the Spanish colonization of the Americas), which led to syncretic religious practice, rejection or resistance to new religions, covert practice of indigenous religions, and/or misunderstandings and misinterpretations of both indigenous and colonizer religions (Hanks 2010 [26] Klor de Alva 1982, [27] Wernke 2007 [28] ).

This research combines archaeological and anthropological method and theory with historical method and theory. In addition to recovering, recording, and analyzing material culture, historical archaeologists use archives, oral histories, ethnohistorical accounts. Researchers read texts critically, emphasizing the historical context of the documents (especially regarding underrepresented peoples whose voices may be distorted or missing) in order to better understand religious practices that may have been discouraged or even severely punished. Combined archaeological, historical, and anthropological data sets may contradict each other, or the material record may illuminate the details of covert or syncretic religious practice, as well as resistance to dominant religious forms. For example, our understanding of the religious practice of enslaved peoples in the United States (e.g. Leone and Frye 2001, [29] Fennell 2007 [30] ) has increased dramatically thanks to research in historical archaeology.

Material correlates

Because archaeology studies human history through objects, buildings, bodies, and spaces, archaeologists must engage theories that connect anthropological and sociological theories of religion to material culture and landscapes. Theories of materiality [31] and landscape [32] serve to connect human activities, experiences, and behaviors to social practices, including religion. Theories of embodiment [33] also serve to interpret human remains as they relate to religion and ritual.

The archaeology of religion makes use of the same material evidence as other branches of archaeology, but certain artifact classes are particularly emphasized in studying religion and ritual in the past:

Examples of research by area

Africa

Americas

Asia

Europe

Australia/South Pacific

Modern debates

Modern religious use of archaeological sites

Contemporary religious groups often claim archaeological sites as part of their heritage, and make use of archaeological sites and artifacts in their religious practice (e.g. Wallis 2003 [57] ). These practices and religious interpretations of sites may clash with archaeological interpretations, leading to disputes about heritage, preservation, use of sites, and the "ownership" of history (Bender 1999 [58] ).

Biblical archaeology

Biblical archaeology is a field of archaeology that seeks to correlate events in the Bible with concrete archaeological sites and artifacts (Meyers 1984, [59] Richardson 1916 [60] ).

See also

Related Research Articles

Pseudoarchaeology—also known as alternative archaeology, fringe archaeology, fantastic archaeology, cult archaeology, and spooky archaeology—is the interpretation of the past by people who are not professional archaeologists and who reject or ignore the accepted data gathering and analytical methods of the discipline. These pseudoscientific interpretations involve the use of artifacts, sites or materials to construct scientifically insubstantial theories to strengthen the pseudoarchaeologists' claims. Methods include exaggeration of evidence, dramatic or romanticized conclusions, use of fallacious arguments, and fabrication of evidence.

Environmental archaeology is a sub-field of archaeology which emerged in 1970s and is the science of reconstructing the relationships between past societies and the environments they lived in. The field represents an archaeological-palaeoecological approach to studying the palaeoenvironment through the methods of human palaeoecology. Reconstructing past environments and past peoples' relationships and interactions with the landscapes they inhabited provides archaeologists with insights into the origin and evolution of anthropogenic environments, and prehistoric adaptations and economic practices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bloodletting in Mesoamerica</span>

Bloodletting was the ritualized practice of self-cutting or piercing of an individual's body that served a number of ideological and cultural functions within ancient Mesoamerican societies, in particular the Maya. When performed by ruling elites, the act of bloodletting was crucial to the maintenance of sociocultural and political structure. Bound within the Mesoamerican belief systems, bloodletting was used as a tool to legitimize the ruling lineage's socio-political position and, when enacted, was important to the perceived well-being of a given society or settlement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pyramid of the Sun</span> Pyramid structure in Mexico

The Pyramid of the Sun is the largest building in Teotihuacan, and one of the largest in Mesoamerica. It is believed to have been constructed about 200 CE. Found along the Avenue of the Dead, in between the Pyramid of the Moon and the Ciudadela, and in the shadow of the mountain Cerro Gordo, the pyramid is part of a large complex in the heart of the city.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spiro Mounds</span> Precontact Indigenous ceremonial site in Oklahoma

Spiro Mounds is an Indigenous archaeological site located in present-day eastern Oklahoma. The site was built by people from the Arkansas Valley Caddoan culture. that remains from an American Indian culture that was part of the major northern Caddoan Mississippian culture. The 80-acre site is located within a floodplain on the southern side of the Arkansas River. The modern town of Spiro developed approximately seven miles to the south.

Entheogenic drugs have been used by various groups for thousands of years. There are numerous historical reports as well as modern, contemporary reports of indigenous groups using entheogens, chemical substances used in a religious, shamanic, or spiritual context.

Timothy R. Pauketat is an American archaeologist, director of the Illinois State Archaeological Survey, the Illinois State Archaeologist, and professor of anthropology and medieval studies at the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana. He is known for his historical theories and his investigations at Cahokia, the major center of precolonial Mississippian culture in the American Bottom region of Illinois near St. Louis, Missouri.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paleolithic religion</span> Religions thought to have appeared during the Paleolithic time period

Paleolithic religions are a set of spiritual beliefs and practices that are theorized to have appeared during the Paleolithic time period. Paleoanthropologists Andre Leroi-Gourhan and Annette Michelson believe unmistakably religious behavior emerged by the Upper Paleolithic, before 30,000 years ago at the latest, but behavioral patterns such as burial rites that one might characterize as religious — or as ancestral to religious behavior — reach back into the Middle Paleolithic, as early as 300,000 years ago, coinciding with the first appearance of Homo neanderthalensis and possibly Homo naledi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaeology</span> Study of human activity via material culture

Archaeology or archeology is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes. Archaeology can be considered both a social science and a branch of the humanities. It is usually considered an independent academic discipline, but may also be classified as part of anthropology, history or geography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maya cave sites</span>

Mayan cave sites are associated with the Mayan civilization of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica. Beliefs and observances connected with these cave sites persist among some contemporary Mayan communities. Many of the Mayan caves served religious purposes. For this reason, the artifacts found there, alongside the epigraphic, iconographic, and ethnographic studies, help build the modern-day understanding of the Mayan religion and society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indigenous archaeology</span> Sub-discipline of western archaeological theory

Indigenous archaeology is a sub-discipline of Western archaeological theory that seeks to engage and empower indigenous people in the preservation of their heritage and to correct perceived inequalities in modern archaeology. It also attempts to incorporate non-material elements of cultures, like oral traditions, into the wider historical narrative. This methodology came out of the global anti-colonial movements of the 1970s and 1980s led by aboriginal and indigenous people in settler-colonial nations, like the United States, Canada, and Australia. Major issues the sub-discipline attempts to address include the repatriation of indigenous remains to their respective peoples, the perceived biases that western archaeology's imperialistic roots have imparted into its modern practices, and the stewardship and preservation of indigenous people's cultures and heritage sites. This has encouraged the development of more collaborative relationships between archaeologists and indigenous people and has increased the involvement of indigenous people in archaeology and its related policies.

Household archaeology has a long history of anthropological inquiry. Archaeological investigations of the household serve as a microcosm for the greater social universe. The household serves as a space for socialization processes. Household archaeology focuses on the household as a social unit, and involves research on the household's dwelling and other related architecture, material culture, features, and larger sociopolitical organizations that are associated with a specific culture. Household social relationships have been associated as serving as an "atom" for society. Therefore, household studied effectively convey information pertaining to flexible economic and ecological conditions Household activity encompasses spheres of activity related to function and how people act. Household archaeology redefines the notion of the household and the domestic by challenging notions of what households are, how they operate and the social implications of such analysis. The material culture provides information about such activities. Households are families, domestic groups, and co-habitations. Households function in a variety of fashions.

<i>Incidents of Travel in Chichen Itza</i>

Incidents of Travel in Chichén Itzá is an ethnographic film . Jeff Himpele and Quetzil E. Castañeda, filmmakers and producers. Production 1995 and 1997. Postproduction release: 1997.

<i>Signals of Belief in Early England</i> Book edited by Martin Carver, Alex Sanmark and Sarah Semple

Signals of Belief in Early England: Anglo-Saxon Paganism Revisited is an academic anthology edited by the British archaeologists Martin Carver, Alex Sanmark and Sarah Semple which was first published by Oxbow Books in 2010. Containing nine separate papers produced by various scholars working in the fields of Anglo-Saxon archaeology and Anglo-Saxon history, the book presents a number of new perspectives on Anglo-Saxon paganism and, to a lesser extent, early Anglo-Saxon Christianity. The collection – published in honour of the archaeologist Audrey Meaney – was put together on the basis of a conference on "Paganism and Popular Practice" held at the University of Oxford in 2005.

<i>The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic</i> Book by Ralph Merrifield

The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic is an archaeological study of the material evidence for ritual and magical practices in Europe, containing a particular emphasis on London and South East England. It was written by the English archaeologist Ralph Merrifield, the former deputy director of the Museum of London, and first published by B.T. Batsford in 1987.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timothy Insoll</span> British archaeologist and academic (born 1967)

Timothy Insoll is a British archaeologist and Africanist and Islamic Studies scholar. Since 2016 he has been Al-Qasimi Professor of African and Islamic Archaeology at the University of Exeter. He is also founder and director of the Centre for Islamic Archaeology. Previously he was at the Department of Archaeology at the University of Manchester (1999–2016).

The archaeology of trade and exchange is a sub-discipline of archaeology that identifies how material goods and ideas moved across human populations. The terms “trade” and “exchange” have slightly different connotations: trade focuses on the long-distance circulation of material goods; exchange considers the transfer of persons and ideas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maya dedication rituals</span>

The Classic Maya used dedication rituals to sanctify their living spaces and family members by associating their physical world with supernatural concepts through religious practice. The existence of such rituals is inferred from the frequent occurrence of so-called 'dedication' or 'votive' cache deposits in an archaeological context.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistoric religion</span> Religion before written records

Prehistoric religion is the religious practice of prehistoric cultures. Prehistory, the period before written records, makes up the bulk of human experience; over 99% of human experience occurred during the Paleolithic period alone. Prehistoric cultures spanned the globe and existed for over two and a half million years; their religious practices were many and varied, and the study of them is difficult due to the lack of written records describing the details of their faiths.

Funerary archaeology is a branch of archaeology that studies the treatment and commemoration of the dead. It includes the study of human remains, their burial contexts, and from single grave goods through to monumental landscapes. Funerary archaeology might be considered a sub-set of the study of religion and belief. A wide range of expert areas contribute to funerary archaeology, including epigraphy, material culture studies, thanatology, human osteology, zooarchaeology and stable isotope analysis.

References

  1. Dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Religion) Based on the Random House Dictionary, Random House, Inc. 2010
  2. Dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ritual) Based on the Random House Dictionary, Random House, Inc. 2010
  3. Elson, Christina and Michael E. Smith (2001) Archaeological Deposits from the Aztec New Fire Ceremony. Ancient Mesoamerica, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 157–174
  4. 1 2 Kyder-Reid, Elizabeth (1996) The Construction of Sanctity: Landscape and Ritual in a Religious Community. In Landscape Archaeology: Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape. Rebecca Yamin and Karen Bescherer Metheny, eds. University of Tennessee Press.
  5. 1 2 Bowie, F. (2000) The Anthropology of religion. Oxford: Blackwell. Quoted in Insoll, Timothy (2004) Archaeology, Religion, Ritual. New York: Routeledge, page 8
  6. Insoll, Timothy (2004) Archaeology, Religion, Ritual. New York: Routeledge
  7. Elson, Christina and Michael E. Smith (2001:157) Archaeological Deposits from the Aztec New Fire Ceremony. Ancient Mesoamerica, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 157–174
  8. Durkheim, Émile. (1998) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford University Press
  9. Marx, Karl (1992) Early Writings. Penguin Classics.
  10. Geertz, Clifford (1973:90) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. P. 90
  11. Turner, Victor (1995) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Aldine Transaction.
  12. Heydebrand, Wolf (1994) Sociological Writings: Max Weber. Continuum Press.
  13. Weber, Max (2002) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: and Other Writings. Trans. Peter Baehr. Penguin Classics.
  14. Tremlett, Paul-François (2008) Lévi-Strauss on Religion: The Structuring Mind (Key Thinkers in the Study of Religion). Equionox Publishing.
  15. Douglas, Mary (2003 [1966]) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concept of Pullution and Taboo. Routledge Classics
  16. 1 2 Chenoweth, John M. (2009) Social identity, material culture, and the archaeology of religion: Quaker practices in context. Journal of Social Archaeology 9: 319
  17. Giddens, Anthony (1986) The Constitution of Society: Outline of A Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  18. Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Bourdieu, Pierre (1987) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press.
  20. Pauketat, Timothy, Lucretia S. Kelly, Gayle J. Fritz, Neal H. Lopinot, Scott Elias, and Eve Hargrave (2002) The Residues of Feasting and Public Ritual at Cahokia. American Antiquity, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 257–279
  21. Firth, Raymond (1981) Spiritual Aroma: Religion and Politics. American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 582–601
  22. Wolf, Eric (1991) Religious Regimes and State Formation: Perspectives From European Ethnography. State University of New York Press (August 13, 1991) ISBN   978-0791406519
  23. 1 2 Janusek, John Wayne (2006) The changing ‘nature’ of Tiwanaku religion and the rise of the Andean state. World Archaeology Vol. 38(3): 469–492
  24. Delle, James (2001) Race, Missionaries, and the Struggle to Free Jamaica. In Race and the Archaeology of Identity. Charles E. Orser, Jr., ed. Pp. 177–195. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press
  25. Voss, Barbara (2008) Domesticating Imperialism: Sexual Politics and the Archaeology of Empire. American Anthropologist 110(2): 191–203
  26. William F. Hanks, Converting Words: Maya in the Age of the Cross (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010).
  27. J. Jorge Klor de Alva, "Spiritual Conflict and Accommodation in New Spain: Toward a Typology of Aztec Responses to Christianity", in The Inca and Aztec States, 1400–1800: Anthropology and History, eds. George A. Collier, Renato Rosaldo, & John D. Wirth (New York: Academic Press, 1982).
  28. 1 2 Steven Wernke, "Analogy or Erasure? Dialectics of Religious Transformation in the Early Doctrinas of the Colca Valley, Peru", International Journal of Historical Archaeology, vol. 11, no. 2 (June 2007).
  29. 1 2 Mark P. Leone & Gladys Marie Frye, "A Coherent Religion among African Slaves," in Race and the Archaeology of Identity, ed. By C. Orser (University of Utah Press, 2001).
  30. 1 2 Christopher Fennell, Crossroads and Cosmologies: Diasporas and Ethnogenesis in the New World (University of Florida Press, 2007).
  31. Meskell, Lynn (2005) Archaeologies of Materiality. Wiley-Blackwell.
  32. Johnson, Matthew (2006) Ideas of Landscape. Wiley-Blackwell
  33. Hammelkis, Yannis, Mark Pluciennik, and Sarah Tarlow (eds) (2001) Thinking Through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. Springer.
  34. Carr, Christopher (1995) Mortuary Practices: Their Social, Philosophical-Religious, Circumstantial, and Physical Determinants. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 105–200
  35. Lohmann, Roger Ivar (2005) The Afterlife of Asabano Corpses: Relationships with the Deceased in Papua New Guinea. Ethnology, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 189–206
  36. Barnes, Gina L. (1995) An Introduction to Buddhist Archaeology. World Archaeology, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 165–182
  37. Graham, Elizabeth (1998) Mission Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 27, pp. 25–62
  38. Reid, Andrew, Paul Lane, Alinah Segobye, Lowe Borjeson, Nonofo Mathibidi, and Princess Sekgarametso (1997) Tswana Architecture and Responses to Colonialism. World Archaeology, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 370–392
  39. 1 2 Clendinnen, Inga (1980) Landscape and Worldview: The Survival of Yucatec Maya Culture under Spanish Conquest. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 374–393
  40. Kyder-Reid, Elizabeth (1996) The Construction of Sanctity: Landscape and Ritual in a Religious Community. In Landscape Archaeology: Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape. Rebecca Yamin and Karen Bescherer Metheny, eds. University of Tennessee Press.
  41. Robb, John E. (1998) The Archaeology of Symbols. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 27, pp. 329–346
  42. Clendinnen, Inga (1980) Landscape and Worldview: The Survival of Yucatec Maya Culture under Spanish Conquest. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 374–393
  43. Elson, Christina and Michael E. Smith (2001:157) Archaeological Deposits from the Aztec New Fire Ceremony. Ancient Mesoamerica, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 157–174
  44. Morehart, Christopher T., David L. Lentz, and Keith M. Prufer (2005) Wood of the Gods: The Ritual Use of Pine (PINUS SPP.) by the Ancient Lowland Maya. Latin American Antiquity, 16(3), pp. 255–274
  45. Baines, John (1987) Practical Religion and Piety. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 73, pp. 79–98
  46. Hakansson, N. Thomas (1998) Rulers and Rainmakers in Pre-colonial South Pare, Tanzania: Exchange and Ritual Experts in Political Centralization. Ethnology, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 263–283
  47. Reid, Andrew, Paul Lane, Alinah Segobye, Lowe Borjeson, Nonofo Mathibidi, and Prinecss Sekgarametso (1997) Tswana Architecture and Responses to Colonialism. World Archaeology, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 370–392
  48. Brown, Linda A. (2004) Dangerous Places and Wild Spaces: Creating Meaning with Materials at Contemporary Maya Shrines on El Duende Mountain
  49. Graham, Elizabeth (1998) Mission Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 27, pp. 25–62
  50. Barnes, Gina L. (1995) An Introduction to Buddhist Archaeology. World Archaeology, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 165–182
  51. Hooja, Rima. Icons, Artifacts, and Interpretations of the Past: Early Hinduism in Rejasthan. World Archaeology, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 360–377
  52. Crawford, Sally (2004) Votive Deposition, Religion, and the Anglo-Saxon Furnished Burial Ritual. World Archaeology, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 87–102
  53. Herva, Vesa-Pekka (2006) Flower Lovers, after all? Rethinking Religion and Human-Environment Relations in Minoan Crete. World Archaeology, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 568–598
  54. Gilchrist, Roberta (2008) Nurturing the dead: Medieval women as family undertakers. In Monton-subias, S. and Sanchez-Romero, M. (eds) Engendering Social Dynamics: the Archaeology of Maintenance Activities. British Archaeological Report International Series, Oxford, pp. 41–47.
  55. Lohmann, Roger Ivar (2005) The Afterlife of Asabano Corpses: Relationships with the Deceased in Papua New Guinea. Ethnology, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 189–206
  56. McNiven, Ian J. (2003) Saltwater People: Spiritscapes, Maritime Rituals and the Archaeology of Australian Indigenous Seascapes. World Archaeology, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 329–349
  57. Wallis, Robert J. and Jenny Blain (2003) Sites, Sacredness, and Stories: Interactions of Archaeology and Contemporary Paganism. Folklore, Vol. 114, No. 3, pp. 307–321
  58. Bender, Barbara (1999) Stonehenge: Making Space. Berg Publishers
  59. Meyers, Eric M. (1984) The Bible and Archaeology. The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 36–40
  60. Richardson, G.H. (1916) The Value of Biblical Archaeology. The Biblical World, Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 381–387