Atmosfair

Last updated
Atmosfair
Formation2005
TypeIndependent German non-profit (gGmbH)
PurposeClimate compensation
HeadquartersBonn
Services Carbon offsetting
Budget
€7.1 Million [1]
Staff
31 [1]
Website www.atmosfair.de/en

Atmosfair is an independent German non-profit organization which offers offsets for greenhouse gases emitted by aircraft, cruise ships, long-distance coaches, and events. The organization, founded in 2005, develops and finances small-scale energy efficiency and renewable energy projects in developing countries, which lead to reduced carbon emissions. Atmosfair has repeatedly won acclaim for operating with a high degree of transparency and accountability, as well as efficient use of funds. [2]

Contents

Its sole shareholder, the Stiftung Zukunftsfähigkeit (Foundation for Sustainability), was born from a joint research project by the Federal Ministry of the Environment and the organization Germanwatch. Atmosfair's acting patrons are Klaus Töpfer, Mojib Latif and Hartmut Graßl. Furthermore, the organization is a signatory of the Initiative for a transparent civil society (Initiative transparente Zivilgesellschaft). [3]

Atmosfair is registered in Bonn and is run from its office in Berlin.

Method

Atmosfair has developed an emission calculator that calculates the different greenhouse gases emitted when travelling and translates them into a corresponding amount of carbon-dioxide based on their climate impact. [4] For flights, the calculations are based on the departure and arrival airports as well as flight class and plane model. For cruises the defining factors are the type of ship, type of cabin and the number of days spent at sea. [5] Calculations also include climate-relevant emissions other than carbon dioxide, such as nitrogen oxides and sooty particles, which contribute to the greenhouse effect, especially at high altitudes (e.g. through ozone buildup or condensation trails). According to a study led by the German Federal Ministry of the Environment, this accounts for a factor of 3–5, meaning that a liter of aviation fuel has a warming effect that is 3–5 times stronger as the effects of its carbon-dioxide emissions alone. [6]

The calculator is available on the Atmosfair website and free to use. [7] After calculating their emissions, the customer can make a donation corresponding to the amount of emissions they want to offset. The corresponding amount of emissions will then be cut elsewhere through climate change mitigation projects.

All projects run by Atmosfair exclusively supports climate change mitigation projects that fall within the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM, Kyoto protocol) [8] and comply with the Gold Standard. [9] Projects supported by Atmosfair therefore generate Gold Standard CERs (Certified Emissions Reductions) that are then retired accordingly. Atmosfair's policy does not provide for the inclusion of Verified Emission Reduction (VERs), as they do not require the liability of an external auditor. [10]

Beyond flights and cruise ships, Atmosfair also offers carbon offsets for events such as conferences or conventions (MICE).

Funding

The organization is predominantly financed by donations, backed with interest incomes from reserves as well as incomes generated by the sale of carbon emissions calculations software. Climate change mitigation projects and technology purchases led on behalf of customers are an additional source of revenue.

According to the annual reports of 2009 to 2017, at least 90% of donations to Atmosfair were spent directly on projects in developing countries. Since projects are planned to run for many years, payments are made according to need. It can take up to two years for a donation to reach its intended project.

Thus, Atmosfair has greatly exceeded its goal of limiting expenditures for project staff, customer service staff and administration (rent, IT etc.) to 20%.

YearRevenue
DonationsOther
2005166.160 €144 €
2006 [11] 190.113 €4.263 €
2007 [12] 1.328.208 €46.310 €
2008 [10] 2.036.912 €114.198 €
2009 [13] 2.255.464 €381.899 €
2010 [14] 2.153.162 €978.485 €
2011 [15] 1.913.851 €2.163.050 €
2012 [16] 1.962.374 €1.298.283 €
2013 [17] 2.297.204 €1.641.127 €
2014 [18] 3.657.294 €935.657 €
2015 [19] 2.873.114 €478.520 €
2016 [20] 3.509.649 €675.717 €
2017 [1] 6.553.822 €562.337 €

Projects

In 2017, Atmosfair financed projects in the following four categories:

Stove "Save-80" for efficient biomass usage for cooking Save-80-Stove-Atmosfair.JPG
Stove "Save-80" for efficient biomass usage for cooking

Awards

In 2010 a study conducted by the Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development reviewing carbon offset providers in Germany determined Atmosfair as the only provider to achieve the overall rating "very good" ("sehr gut"). In the categories "realistic calculation", "offsetting quality" and "consumer communication", Atmosfair scored the rating "very good". [21]

In 2006 the climate department of the American Tufts University reviewed 13 organizations offering carbon offsetting. Evaluation criteria were transparency, precision of the calculations, offset prices and administration costs. Atmosfair was awarded the rating "very good" along with three other providers. [22]

Furthermore, Atmosfair was awarded first place in following rankings: [23]

Atmosfair is consistently listed among front runners in other rankings and comparative studies. [23]

Environmental integrity

The advisory board, made by representatives of the Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), acts to ensure the organization's compliance with the standards stated in the annual reports. [29] These include refusing donations from donors whose carbon calculations do not comply with Atmosfair standards. All projects must comply with CDM and Gold Standard; the climate effect of flights must be calculated according to the latest scientific findings and trivializing terms such as "climate neutral" must be avoided.

In 2008, the introduction of additional pollutants into the emissions calculations rendered a cooperation between Atmosfair and Lufthansa impossible. The stance adopted by Atmosfair was well received by the scientific and environmental protection communities as well as by the media. [30]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global warming potential</span> Potential heat absorbed by a greenhouse gas

Global warming potential or greenhouse warming potential (GWP) is a measure of how much infrared thermal radiation a greenhouse gas added to the atmosphere would absorb over a given time frame, as a multiple of the radiation that would be absorbed by the same mass of added carbon dioxide. GWP is 1 for CO2. For other gases it depends on how strongly the gas absorbs infrared thermal radiation, how quickly the gas leaves the atmosphere, and the time frame being considered. The carbon dioxide equivalent is calculated from GWP. For any gas, it is the mass of CO2 that would warm the earth as much as the mass of that gas. Thus it provides a common scale for measuring the climate effects of different gases. It is calculated as GWP times mass of the other gas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emission intensity</span> Emission rate of a pollutant

An emission intensity is the emission rate of a given pollutant relative to the intensity of a specific activity, or an industrial production process; for example grams of carbon dioxide released per megajoule of energy produced, or the ratio of greenhouse gas emissions produced to gross domestic product (GDP). Emission intensities are used to derive estimates of air pollutant or greenhouse gas emissions based on the amount of fuel combusted, the number of animals in animal husbandry, on industrial production levels, distances traveled or similar activity data. Emission intensities may also be used to compare the environmental impact of different fuels or activities. In some case the related terms emission factor and carbon intensity are used interchangeably. The jargon used can be different, for different fields/industrial sectors; normally the term "carbon" excludes other pollutants, such as particulate emissions. One commonly used figure is carbon intensity per kilowatt-hour (CIPK), which is used to compare emissions from different sources of electrical power.

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is a United Nations-run carbon offset scheme allowing countries to fund greenhouse gas emissions-reducing projects in other countries and claim the saved emissions as part of their own efforts to meet international emissions targets. It is one of the three Flexible Mechanisms defined in the Kyoto Protocol. The CDM, defined in Article 12 of the Protocol, was intended to meet two objectives: (1) to assist non-Annex I countries achieve sustainable development and reduce their carbon footprints; and (2) to assist Annex I countries in achieving compliance with their emissions reduction commitments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon offsets and credits</span> Carbon dioxide reduction scheme

A carbon offset is a reduction or removal of emissions of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases in order to compensate for emissions made elsewhere. A carbon credit or offset credit is a transferrable financial instrument, that is a derivative of an underlying commodity. Governments or independent certification bodies certify it as representing an emission reduction that can then be bought or sold. We measure both offsets and credits in tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO2e). One carbon offset or credit represents the reduction or removal of one tonne of carbon dioxide or its equivalent in other greenhouse gases.

Carbon finance is a branch of environmental finance that covers financial tools such as carbon emission trading to reduce the impact of greenhouse gases (GHG) on the environment by giving carbon emissions a price.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon accounting</span> Processes used to measure how much carbon dioxide equivalents an organization sequesters or emits

Carbon accounting is a framework of methods to measure and track how much greenhouse gas (GHG) an organization emits. It can also be used to track projects or actions to reduce emissions in sectors such as forestry or renewable energy. Corporations, cities and other groups use these techniques to help limit climate change. Organizations will often set an emissions baseline, create targets for reducing emissions, and track progress towards them. The accounting methods enable them to do this in a more consistent and transparent manner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alliance to Save Energy</span> A How to Save Energy

The Alliance to Save Energy is a bipartisan, nonprofit coalition of business, government, environmental, and consumer groups based in Washington, D.C. The Alliance states that it advocates for "energy-efficiency policies that minimize costs to society and individual consumers, and that lessen greenhouse gas emissions and their impact on the global climate." The Alliance's chief activities include public relations, research, and lobbying to change U.S. energy policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental effects of aviation</span> Effect of emissions from aircraft engines

Aircraft engines produce gases, noise, and particulates from fossil fuel combustion, raising environmental concerns over their global effects and their effects on local air quality. Jet airliners contribute to climate change by emitting carbon dioxide, the best understood greenhouse gas, and, with less scientific understanding, nitrogen oxides, contrails and particulates. Their radiative forcing is estimated at 1.3–1.4 that of CO2 alone, excluding induced cirrus cloud with a very low level of scientific understanding. In 2018, global commercial operations generated 2.4% of all CO2 emissions.

The Gold Standard (GS), or Gold Standard for the Global Goals, is a standard and logo certification mark program, for non-governmental emission reductions projects in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), the Voluntary Carbon Market and other climate and development interventions. It is published and administered by the Gold Standard Foundation, a non-profit foundation headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. It was designed with an intent to ensure that carbon credits are real, verifiable, and that projects make measurable contributions to sustainable development. The objective of the GS is to add branding, with a quality label, to carbon credits generated by projects which can then be bought and traded by countries that have a binding legal commitment according to the Kyoto Protocol, businesses, or other organizations for carbon offsetting purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions</span> Sources and amounts of greenhouse gases emitted to the atmosphere from human activities

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human activities intensify the greenhouse effect. This contributes to climate change. Carbon dioxide, from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, is one of the most important factors in causing climate change. The largest emitters are China followed by the United States. The United States has higher emissions per capita. The main producers fueling the emissions globally are large oil and gas companies. Emissions from human activities have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide by about 50% over pre-industrial levels. The growing levels of emissions have varied, but have been consistent among all greenhouse gases. Emissions in the 2010s averaged 56 billion tons a year, higher than any decade before. Total cumulative emissions from 1870 to 2017 were 425±20 GtC from fossil fuels and industry, and 180±60 GtC from land use change. Land-use change, such as deforestation, caused about 31% of cumulative emissions over 1870–2017, coal 32%, oil 25%, and gas 10%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon price</span> CO2 Emission Market

Carbon pricing is a method for nations to address climate change. The cost is applied to greenhouse gas emissions in order to encourage polluters to reduce the combustion of coal, oil and gas – the main driver of climate change. The method is widely agreed and considered to be efficient. Carbon pricing seeks to address the economic problem that emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases (GHG) are a negative externality – a detrimental product that is not charged for by any market.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States</span> Climate changing gases from the North American country

The United States produced 5.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020, the second largest in the world after greenhouse gas emissions by China and among the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person. In 2019 China is estimated to have emitted 27% of world GHG, followed by the United States with 11%, then India with 6.6%. In total the United States has emitted a quarter of world GHG, more than any other country. Annual emissions are over 15 tons per person and, amongst the top eight emitters, is the highest country by greenhouse gas emissions per person. However, the IEA estimates that the richest decile in the US emits over 55 tonnes of CO2 per capita each year. Because coal-fired power stations are gradually shutting down, in the 2010s emissions from electricity generation fell to second place behind transportation which is now the largest single source. In 2020, 27% of the GHG emissions of the United States were from transportation, 25% from electricity, 24% from industry, 13% from commercial and residential buildings and 11% from agriculture. In 2021, the electric power sector was the second largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for 25% of the U.S. total. These greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to climate change in the United States, as well as worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ClimateCare</span>

ClimateCare is a profit for purpose environmental and social impact company known for its role providing carbon offset services, with a particular focus on using carbon and other results based finance to support its 'Climate+Care Projects'. It also provides businesses and governments with sustainable development programmes, environmental and social impact measurement and project development.

<i>Livestocks Long Shadow</i> United Nations report

Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options is a United Nations report, released by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations on 29 November 2006, that "aims to assess the full impact of the livestock sector on environmental problems, along with potential technical and policy approaches to mitigation". It stated that livestock accounts for 18% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, a figure which FAO changed to 14.5% in its 2013 study Tackling climate change through livestock.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage</span>

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is the process of extracting bioenergy from biomass and capturing and storing the carbon, thereby removing it from the atmosphere. BECCS can be a "negative emissions technology" (NET). The carbon in the biomass comes from the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) which is extracted from the atmosphere by the biomass when it grows. Energy ("bioenergy") is extracted in useful forms (electricity, heat, biofuels, etc.) as the biomass is utilized through combustion, fermentation, pyrolysis or other conversion methods.

myclimate

myclimate was spun off from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich in 2002 as a nonprofit climate protection organisation based in Switzerland to enable climate protection with economic mechanisms such as price-tagging carbon dioxide and integrating the externality into the market. They promote climate protection on three levels: avoidance techniques such as capacity building and teaching, reduction and carbon offsetting. myclimate advocates for the development of a carbon market while setting new standards in carbon emissions and in designing a sustainable society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation and climate change</span> Relationship between deforestation and global warming

Deforestation is a primary contributor to climate change, and climate change affects forests. Land use changes, especially in the form of deforestation, are the second largest anthropogenic source of atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions, after fossil fuel combustion. Greenhouse gases are emitted during combustion of forest biomass and decomposition of remaining plant material and soil carbon. Global models and national greenhouse gas inventories give similar results for deforestation emissions. As of 2019, deforestation is responsible for about 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation are accelerating. Growing forests are a carbon sink with additional potential to mitigate the effects of climate change. Some of the effects of climate change, such as more wildfires, insect outbreaks, invasive species, and storms are factors that increase deforestation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon budget</span> Limit on carbon dioxide emission for a given climate impact

A carbon budget is a concept used in climate policy to help set emissions reduction targets in a fair and effective way. It looks at "the maximum amount of cumulative net global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions that would result in limiting global warming to a given level". When expressed relative to the pre-industrial period it is referred to as the total carbon budget, and when expressed from a recent specified date it is referred to as the remaining carbon budget.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CO2balance</span>

CO2balance UK Ltd is a British profit-for-purpose carbon management consultancy and project developer founded in 2003. It is known for developing carbon finance projects in developing countries that reduce carbon emissions and support the Sustainable Development Goals. CO2balance also provides businesses and individuals with carbon footprint calculation and reduction services, bestowing the label of ‘CarbonZero’ on those organisations that completely offset the footprint of their operations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions by Russia</span> Greenhouse gas emissions originating from Russia and efforts to reduce them

Greenhouse gas emissionsbyRussia are mostly from fossil gas, oil and coal. Russia emits 2 or 3 billion tonnes CO2eq of greenhouse gases each year; about 4% of world emissions. Annual carbon dioxide emissions alone are about 12 tons per person, more than double the world average. Cutting greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore air pollution in Russia, would have health benefits greater than the cost. The country is the world's biggest methane emitter, and 4 billion dollars worth of methane was estimated to leak in 2019/20.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "atmosfair Annual Report 2017" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  2. 1 2 "CO2 Kompensation, diese Anbieter tun am meisten für den Klimaschutz". www.test.de. Stiftung Warentest. 2018-02-13. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
  3. "Signees of the Declaration against Corruption". www.transparency.de. Transparency International Deutschland e.V. Archived from the original on 2018-02-08. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
  4. "atmosfair Flight Emissions Calculator - Documentation of the Method and Data" (PDF). atmosfair gGmbH. 2016. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
  5. "CO2 Emissionsrechner für Hochseekreuzfahrten: Dokumentation der Berechnungsmethode, Version 1.1" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2010. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
  6. "Klimawirksamkeit des Flugverkehrs, Aktueller wissenschaftlicher Kenntnisstand" (PDF). www.umweltbundesamt.de. Umweltbundesamt. 2012. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
  7. "CO2-Emissions Calculator". www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. Retrieved 2019-03-11.
  8. "Article 12, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change" (PDF). UNFCCC, Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). United Nations Climate Change. 1998. p. 12. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
  9. "CDM Gold Standard for Climate Change Mitigation Projects". www.goldstandard.org. The Gold Standard Foundation. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
  10. 1 2 "atmosfair Annual Report 2008" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2009. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  11. "atmosfair Annual Report 2006" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2007. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  12. "atmosfair Annual Report 2007" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2008. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  13. "atmosfair Annual Report 2009" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2010. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  14. "atmosfair Annual Report 2010" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2011. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  15. "atmosfair Annual Report 2011" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2012. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  16. "atmosfair Annual Report 2012" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2013. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  17. "atmosfair Annual Report 2013" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2014. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  18. "atmosfair Annual Report 2014" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2015. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  19. "atmosfair Annual Report 2015" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2016. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  20. "atmosfair Annual Report 2016" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2017. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  21. "Treibhausgas Kompensationsanbieter in Deutschland" (PDF). Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development. 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 16, 2013. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
  22. "Voluntary Offsets For Air-Travel Carbon Emissions, Evaluations and Recommendations of Thirteen Offset Companies" (PDF). Tufts Climate Initiative. 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 12, 2012. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
  23. 1 2 "Test winner atmosfair; All comparative studies and tests since the founding of atmosfair" (PDF). www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2018. Retrieved 2021-01-24.
  24. "Nur drei Anbieter für CO2-Ausgleich von Flugreisen uneingeschränkt zu empfehlen". Verbraucherverband Bundeszentrale. 2010-08-06. Archived from the original on January 12, 2012.
  25. Hammer, Erwin; Vorbach, Stefan (March 2010). "Voluntary Carbon Offsets – Eine Bewertung europäischer Retailer von Zertifikaten zum Ausgleich von Treibhausgasemissionen". Uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum. 18 (1): 71–77. doi:10.1007/s00550-010-0171-y. S2CID   154437110.
  26. Heughebaert, André (2008). "Etude comparative des programmes de compensation volontaire de CO2 en Belgique" (PDF). Etude commandée par la Fédération Inter-Environnement Wallonie. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 19, 2012.
  27. "W2 On Test. Ofsetting Carbon Emissions" (PDF). BBC Wildlife. BBC. January 2007. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-11-24. Retrieved 2021-01-24.
  28. "About Us". Atmosfair GmbH. Archived from the original on 2019-07-23. Retrieved 2021-01-24.
  29. "Memorandum of Association of the atmosfair gGmbH, §9". www.atmosfair.de. atmosfair gGmbH. 2005. Retrieved 2019-03-11.
  30. Hammer, Benjamin (2007-09-18). "Umweltverbände kritisieren Berechnungen der Fluglinie, Lufthansa bietet Kunden freiwillige Klimaabgabe an". www.berliner-zeitung.de. Berliner Zeitung. Retrieved 2019-03-11.