Bar Standards Board

Last updated

Bar Standards Board logo Bar Standards Board logo.svg
Bar Standards Board logo

The Bar Standards Board regulates barristers in England and Wales for the public interest. It is responsible for:

Contents

The BSB's functions were originally carried out by the General Council of the Bar, the barristers' representative body, until 2006 when the Bar Council created the BSB as an independent regulator. The Legal Services Board has once - in 2013 - questioned the independence of the BSB from the Bar Council. [1]

The BSB's governing board meets monthly at its headquarters in High Holborn, London, and holds public and private sessions. It has a majority of lay (non-barrister) members and the remainder are barristers. Its chair is Kathryn Stone OBE. The vice-chair is Andrew Mitchell KC. since January 2021. He replaced Naomi Ellenbogen KC who was appointed to the High Court on 2 November 2020.

Members of the BSB's board as of December 2019 [2] are:

Barrister Members: Andrew Mitchell KC, Leslie Thomas KC, Elizabeth Prochaska, Adam Solomon KC and Irena Sabic.

Lay Members: Alison Allden OBE, Steven Haines, Emir Feisal, Kathryn Stone OBE, and Stephen Thornton CBE.

List of Chairs

Activity

Maintaining standards of conduct

The BSB is responsible for setting the standards of conduct at the Bar. This is delivered through the BSB Handbook, the current version of which was released in 2020. [3]

The BSB Handbook is structured around the Core Duties (Part 2 of the Handbook), which underpin the full regulatory framework. It also has specific rules for certain circumstances. The Handbook outlines the intended regulatory outcomes for the rules.

Enforcement

The BSB receives approximately 2,000 reports about the conduct of barristers each year. [4] Of these, less than one percent are typically suspended or disbarred.

Reports are categorised according to whether staff members at the BSB can impose an administrative sanction (typically a written warning or up to £1,000 fine) or whether they are required to be passed to the five-person panel of the Independent Decision-making Body. [5] If the barrister agrees and the matter is not serious, the panel can impose a fine, restrictions on their licence to practice, order them to complete ongoing professional development, or they can reprimand them.

If the barrister disputes what happened, or the matter is more serious, the case is passed onto a Disciplinary tribunal. [6] Disciplinary tribunals are arranged by the independent Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service and can be made up of either three or five people. [7]

Education and training

The BSB oversees the process to qualify as a barrister. After consultation, it approved four new pathways to qualifying as a barrister: the three-step pathway, the four-step pathway, the integrated pathway, and the apprenticeship pathway. [8] This replaced the Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) in 2020.

The BSB also oversees the arrangements for transferring lawyers and issues approvals from the Authorisations team to applicants. [9]

The BSB is responsible for assuring competence, which it does through the Professional Statement and through Continuing Professional Development (CPD). [10] There are separate programmes for CPD for new and established practitioners. [11]

BSB Entities and Alternative Business Structures

The Bar Standards Board also authorise and regulate "BSB entities", which fall into two distinct bodies: BSB authorised bodies (previously referred to as "entities") are fully owned and managed by authorised, such as lawyers with a current practising certificate. BSB licensed bodies (also known as "Alternative Business Structures" or ABSs), however, are owned and managed jointly by both authorised and non-authorised individuals. [12] The Bar Standards Board held a workshop at the 2016 Annual Bar Conference, [13] and authorised the first three Licensed Bodies in April 2017, including VII Law, Minerva Law and ShenSmith Law. [14] Licensed bodies have been reported by Thomson Reuters as a leading innovation of the legal industry. [15]

Criticism

In 2019, the BSB announced it would be withdrawing from Legal Choices, a consumer-facing website designed to help the public to access information about legal issues and legal advisers. [16] The Legal Services Board criticised the BSB's decision, suggesting that regulators needed to do more to help consumers to understand legal services and compare providers.

Handling of BPTC exams during the COVID-19 pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the BSB postponed the April sitting of the centralised assessments for the BPTC. It announced that Pearson VUE would deliver the exams remotely in August. [17] A small number of exams could be sat in physical centres where reasonable adjustments were required.

Students alleged that the proposals were discriminatory against those with caring responsibilities, living in noisy houses or with poor internet connection, those menstruating, or those who required breaks. They also claimed that international students in different time zones would be negatively affected. [18] They therefore called for the exams to be delivered as open book. After the BSB responded, students also suggested that the arrangements were not suitable for those shielding from COVID-19. [19]

Pearson VUE also had extremely strict anti-cheating protocols, meaning that if another person was detected in any way, the exam would be terminated with no score given. [20]

During the exams, they were hit with a wide range of technical problems, such as exams being terminated without a reason given or loss of internet connection. [21] Students were also unable to take a break for any reason, leading to several students urinating in receptacles while still sitting their exams. [22]

The BSB apologised to students and appointed an independent review, led by Professor Rebecca Huxley-Binns. [23] The review concluded that the BSB had made the correct decision to cancel the April exams and take on the arrangements of the August exams, and the correct decision to use Pearson VUE to deliver online exams, either at home or in a test centre. [24] However, the review also concluded that the closed book format and the decision not to allow breaks both contributed to the outcomes. Finally, the review suggested that the statistical analysis provided by Pearson VUE about how many examinations had been successfully delivered was not reliable.

Handling of complaint against Dinah Rose KC

In 2022, the Bar Standards Board apologised to Dinah Rose KC for making a statement about how it handled a complaint against her. [25]

Rose had acted for the Cayman Islands government before the Privy Council, arguing that the Caribbean islands’ constitution did not give same-sex couples the right to marry. A complaint was made against her, and the BSB responded to the complainant that “As a senior barrister she could be expected to be aware of the cab-rank rule and its operation in practice. Taking this at its highest, this might possibly amount to evidence of recklessness.” [26] Rose had not been given the opportunity to respond to the complaint.

The BSB later clarified that no regulatory action had been taken against Rose, and that she had been correct to act in accordance with the cab-rank rule. [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrister</span> Lawyer specialised in court representation in certain jurisdictions

A barrister is a type of lawyer in common law jurisdictions. Barristers mostly specialise in courtroom advocacy and litigation. Their tasks include arguing cases in courts and tribunals, drafting legal pleadings, researching the law and giving legal opinions.

Legal ethics are principles of conduct that members of the legal profession are expected to observe in their practice. They are an outgrowth of the development of the legal profession itself.

A bar examination is an examination administered by the bar association of a jurisdiction that a lawyer must pass in order to be admitted to the bar of that jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barristers in England and Wales</span> One of the two main categories of lawyer in England and Wales

Barristers in England and Wales are one of the two main categories of lawyer in England and Wales, the other being solicitors. Barristers have traditionally had the role of handling cases for representation in court, both defence and prosecution.

Nottingham Law School is a law school in the UK with over 100 full-time lecturers and over 2,500 students. It is an academic and professional institution, part of Nottingham Trent University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solicitor advocate</span>

Solicitor advocate is a hybrid status which allows a solicitor in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong to represent clients in higher courts in proceedings that were traditionally reserved for barristers. The status does not exist in most other common law jurisdictions where, for the most part, all solicitors have rights of audience in higher courts.

In English law, the cab-rank rule is the obligation of a barrister to accept any work in a field in which they profess themselves competent to practise, at a court at which they normally appear, and at their usual rates. The rule derives its name from the tradition by which a hackney carriage driver at the head of a queue of taxicabs is obliged to take the first passenger requesting a ride.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal Services Board</span>

The Legal Services Board is an independent body responsible for overseeing the regulation of lawyers in England and Wales. It is a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Ministry of Justice, created through the Legal Services Act of 2007.

BPP University Law School is a private, for-profit provider of professional and academic legal education in the United Kingdom and one of the founding schools of BPP University.

Ombudsmen in Australia are independent agencies who assist when a dispute arises between individuals and industry bodies or government agencies. Government ombudsman services are free to the public, like many other ombudsman and dispute resolution services, and are a means of resolving disputes outside of the court systems. Australia has an ombudsman assigned for each state; as well as an ombudsman for the Commonwealth of Australia. As laws differ between states just one process, or policy, cannot be used across the Commonwealth. All government bodies are within the jurisdiction of the ombudsman.

The General Council of the Bar, commonly known as the Bar Council, is the representative body for barristers in England and Wales. Established in 1894, the Bar Council is the 'approved regulator' of barristers, but discharges its regulatory function to the independent Bar Standards Board. As the lead representative body for barristers in England and Wales, the Bar Council’s work is devoted to ensuring the Bar’s voice is heard, efficiently and effectively, and with the interests of the Bar as its focus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts and Legal Services Act 1990</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that reformed the legal profession and courts of England and Wales. The Act was the culmination of a series of reports and reforms that started with the Benson Commission in the 1970s, and significantly changed the way that the legal profession and court system worked.

The Authorised Conveyancing Practitioners Board is the regulatory organisation and professional association for authorised conveyancers in the United Kingdom. Created in 1990 by the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, the Practitioners Board oversees authorised conveyancers in the United Kingdom, advising the Lord Chancellor on conveyancing matters, regulating authorised conveyancers and preventing the creation of conveyancing monopolies like those that existed before the 1990 act.

Dinah Gwen Lison Rose KC is a British barrister. She has been President of Magdalen College, Oxford since 2020. A member of Blackstone Chambers, she was named Barrister of the Year in The Lawyer Awards 2009. In 2016, she was appointed a Deputy Judge of the High Court.

BPP University is a private university in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bar Professional Training Course</span>

The Bar Professional Training Course or BPTC is a postgraduate course which allows law graduates to be named and practise as barristers in England and Wales. The eight institutes that run the BPTC along with the four prestigious Inns of Court are often collectively referred to as Bar School. Until September 2010, it was known as the Bar Vocational Course, or BVC.

The Legal profession in England and Wales is divided into two distinct branches under the legal system, those of solicitors and barristers. Other legal professions in England and Wales include acting as a judge, as the Attorney-General, as the Solicitor-General, or as the Director of Public Prosecutions.

Robert Fredrick Behrens is the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. He has previously worked as the Chief Executive and Independent Adjudicator for the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA) and as the Complaints Commissioner for the Bar Standards Board.

Henry Joseph Christopher Hendron is an English barrister who has represented several celebrity clients. In 2016, Hendron pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of a controlled drug with intent to supply, for supplying chemsex drugs that killed his boyfriend in a drug overdose the previous year.

References

  1. ↑ "Brothers In Arms?" Legalfutures.co.uk, 13 December 2013. (Retrieved 18 December 2013.)
  2. ↑ "BSB board members".
  3. ↑ "The BSB Handbook". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
  4. ↑ "BSB Annual Report 2022-23" (PDF). Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  5. ↑ "How we make enforcement decisions". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  6. ↑ "How we make enforcement decisions". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  7. ↑ "The disciplinary tribunals process". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  8. ↑ "Bar Qualification Manual: Part 1 - Overview". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  9. ↑ "Bar Qualification Manual: Part 7 - Transferring Qualified Lawyers". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  10. ↑ "Assuring the competence of barristers". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
  11. ↑ "Continuing Professional Development". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
  12. ↑ Bar Standard Board. "Entities, including Alternative Business Structures".
  13. ↑ "BSB workshop on Alternative Business Structures".
  14. ↑ "BSB Entities' Register". Bar Standards Board. Archived from the original on 31 July 2017.
  15. ↑ Roxanne Selby (24 May 2017). "Innovation at the Bar: Who is leading the way?". Thomson Reuters.
  16. ↑ Hilborne, Nick (September 2019). "Revealed: BSB pulls plug on funding for Legal Choices". Legal Futures. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  17. ↑ "BSB ensures that August centralised assessments for the BPTC and Bar Transfer Test can be sat remotely". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  18. ↑ "Online exams will be discriminatory, bar students allege". Law Society Gazette. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  19. ↑ "BSB defends online exams after students raise discrimination concerns". Law Society Gazette. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  20. ↑ "The Bar Standards Board (BSB) Exam Fiasco". The Legal Journal. 18 September 2020. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  21. ↑ "STATEMENT BY THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  22. ↑ "Online law students 'had to use bucket toilet' in exams". BBC News. 13 August 2020. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  23. ↑ "STATEMENT BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  24. ↑ Professor Rebecca Huxley-Binns, Dr Sarabajaya Kumar. "Independent Review of the Bar Standards Board's management of the August sittings of the Centralised Examinations" (PDF). Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  25. ↑ Rose, Neil (23 November 2022). "BSB apologises to top KC over handling of complaint against her". Legal Futures. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  26. ↑ Rose, Neil (23 November 2022). "BSB apologises to top KC over handling of complaint against her". Legal Futures. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  27. ↑ "Statement concerning Dinah Rose KC". Bar Standards Board. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.