Battle of Morbihan

Battle of Morbihan
	Part of the Gallic Wars
Date	Summer 56 BC
Location	Quiberon Bay, France 47°30′N2°52′W / 47.50°N 2.87°W
Result	Roman victory
Belligerents
Roman Republic	Veneti
Commanders and leaders
Julius Caesar ; Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus	;
Strength
c. 110 ships	220 ships
Casualties and losses
Light	Almost all ships destroyed or captured

Last updated May 04, 2024

The Battle of Morbihan, also known as the Battle of Quiberon Bay, was a naval battle fought in the summer of 56 BC between the Gallic tribe of the Veneti and a Roman fleet sent by Julius Caesar. The battle was fought off the coast of Brittany in modern-day France, likely near Quiberon Bay. The battle was a part of the Gallic Wars. The battle ended in a decisive Roman victory.

Background

During the winter of 57–56 BC, Publius Crassus was stationed among the Andecavi. Since the Romans were undersupplied, Crassus sent officers to neighboring tribes to procure food and provisions. Quintus Velanius and Titus Silius were sent to the Veneti, where they were detained. The Veneti offered to return Velanius and Silius, if the Romans returned the hostages they had previously given to Crassus. Caesar interpreted these detentions as an act of war. After receiving word in Illyricum from Crassus, Caesar ordered a fleet to be built on the river Loire and rowers and seamen to be recruited.^[1] When the Veneti learned that Caesar was headed towards them, they prepared for war by gathering their navy and allying with the nearby Osismii, Lexovii, Namnetes, Ambiliati, Morini, Diablintes, and Menapii. Caesar appointed Decimus Brutus to command the Roman fleet.^[2]

The Veneti held the upper hand for much of the campaign. Their ships were well-suited to the region, and when their hill forts were under siege, they could simply evacuate them by sea. Despite having the superior army and great siege equipment, the Romans were making little progress. Caesar realized that the campaign could not be won on land and halted the campaign until the Roman fleet was complete. The fleet was complete near the end of the summer of 56 BC.^[2]

Battle

The Roman fleet met the Veneti fleet around Quiberon Bay. The Veneti fleet had around 220 ships while the Romans are estimated to be outnumbered around two to one, giving a fleet of 110.^[3] Caesar and the Roman army overlooked the battle from cliffs nearby, possibly in modern-day Saint-Gildas-de-Rhuys.^[3] The battle occurred close to shore allowing Caesar and his soldiers to watch and encourage the Roman fleet. The Venetic ships were designed for the open ocean of the Atlantic and so were much larger than the Roman ships adapted to the Mediterranean Sea. Merely the stern of the Venetic ship surpassed the height of the Roman ships, even when equipped with turrets. The Venetic ships were made out of sturdy oak and used sails made of leather to survive ocean-storm weather. Venetic ships were powered entirely by sails as opposed to Roman ships primarily powered by rowers. The Venetic ships were too large and sturdy to ram and so the Romans devised a different plan.^[2]

The Romans attached hooks to the end of wooden poles on their ships. During the engagement, Roman ships positioned next to the Venetic ships until the hooks would catch the Veneti's halyards that held the yard to the mast. Once the hook caught, the Romans rowed fast ahead so the halyard was cut causing the yard and sail to drop. With their sails disabled, the Venetic ships were rendered immobile leaving them vulnerable to encirclement by two or three Roman vessels, which boarded and overpowered the Veneti.^[1]^[4]

The remaining uncaptured ships saw the Roman tactics and began to flee. Soon after the retreat began, the wind stopped and the remaining Venetic ships were stuck in place since they lacked rowers. The attempted flight caused the Venetic ships to become dispersed and unable to help one another. The Romans continued to board the Venetic ships as they had before the flight. Almost all Venetic ships were captured or destroyed using these tactics. The battle lasted from around 10 o-clock in the morning until sunset. Only a few remaining Venetic ships escaped under cover of night.^[2]^[3]

Aftermath

The surviving Veneti surrendered to Julius Caesar following the Battle of Morbihan. Julius Caesar had all members of the Veneti's ruling senate put to death and sold the rest of the population into slavery.^[2] The severity of the punishment was most likely intended to make an example of the Veneti and deter any further uprisings in Gaul.^[1]^[4]

Caesar later used the fleet built for the Battle of Morbihan in his invasions of Britain.^[2]

Historiography

Similar to many events within the Gallic Wars, Commentarii de Bello Gallico by Julius Caesar is the only primary source documenting the events of the Battle of Morbihan. Unexplained within Caesar's account is the delay in constructing the fleet. The fleet took around nine months to prepare, longer than the standard time for fleet construction at the time.^[3]

Later historians have criticized the cruelty Caesar treated the Veneti to following the battle. Napoleon, in his commentaries on the wars of Julius Caesar, says "this conduct was not just; still less was it politic. Such means never achieve their aim; they anger and disgust the nations. The punishment of a few chief people is all that justice and policy permit; it is an important rule to treat prisoners well."^[5] Several historians argue that this punishment among other actions against the Gauls satisfy the modern definition of genocide.^[6]^[7]

Related Research Articles

Gaius Julius Caesar was a Roman general and statesman. A member of the First Triumvirate, Caesar led the Roman armies in the Gallic Wars before defeating his political rival Pompey in a civil war, and subsequently became dictator from 49 BC until his assassination in 44 BC. He played a critical role in the events that led to the demise of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire.

Marcus Antonius, commonly known in English as Mark Antony, was a Roman politician and general who played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic from a constitutional republic into the autocratic Roman Empire.

Vercingetorix was a Gallic king and chieftain of the Arverni tribe who united the Gauls in a failed revolt against Roman forces during the last phase of Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars. After surrendering to Caesar and spending almost six years in prison, he was executed in Rome.

This article concerns the period 59 BC – 50 BC.

Year 53 BC was a year of the pre-Julian Roman calendar. At the time, it was known as the Year of the Consulship of Messalla and Calvinus. The denomination 53 BC for this year has been used since the early medieval period, when the Anno Domini calendar era became the prevalent method in Europe for naming years.

Year 55 BC was a year of the pre-Julian Roman calendar. At the time, it was known as the Year of the Consulship of Crassus and Pompey. The denomination 55 BC for this year has been used since the early medieval period, when the Anno Domini calendar era became the prevalent method in Europe for naming years.

Year 56 BC was a year of the pre-Julian Roman calendar. In the Roman Republic, it was known as the Year of the Consulship of Lentulus and Philippus. The denomination 56 BC for this year has been used since the early medieval period, when the Anno Domini calendar era became the prevalent method in Europe for naming years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gallic Wars</span> 58–50 BC, Rome vs. Gallic tribes

The Gallic Wars were waged between 58 and 50 BC by the Roman general Julius Caesar against the peoples of Gaul. Gallic, Germanic, and Brittonic tribes fought to defend their homelands against an aggressive Roman campaign. The Wars culminated in the decisive Battle of Alesia in 52 BC, in which a complete Roman victory resulted in the expansion of the Roman Republic over the whole of Gaul. Though the collective Gallic armies were as strong as the Roman forces, the Gallic tribes' internal divisions eased victory for Caesar. Gallic chieftain Vercingetorix's attempt to unite the Gauls under a single banner came too late. Caesar portrayed the invasion as being a preemptive and defensive action, but historians agree that he fought the wars primarily to boost his political career and to pay off his debts. Still, Gaul was of significant military importance to the Romans. Native tribes in the region, both Gallic and Germanic, had attacked Rome several times. Conquering Gaul allowed Rome to secure the natural border of the river Rhine.

The Veneti were an Indo-European people who inhabited northeastern Italy, in an area corresponding to the modern-day region of Veneto, from the middle of the 2nd millennium BC and developing their own original civilization along the 1st millennium BC.

Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus was a Roman general and politician of the late republican period and one of the leading instigators of Julius Caesar's assassination. He had previously been an important supporter of Caesar in the Gallic Wars and in the civil war against Pompey. Decimus Brutus is often confused with his distant cousin and fellow conspirator, Marcus Junius Brutus.

The naval forces of the ancient Roman state were instrumental in the Roman conquest of the Mediterranean Basin, but it never enjoyed the prestige of the Roman legions. Throughout their history, the Romans remained a primarily land-based people and relied partially on their more nautically inclined subjects, such as the Greeks and the Egyptians, to build their ships. Because of that, the navy was never completely embraced by the Roman state, and deemed somewhat "un-Roman".

The Venetī were a Gallic tribe dwelling in Armorica, in the southern part of the Brittany Peninsula, during the Iron Age and the Roman period.

Illyricum was a Roman province that existed from 27 BC to sometime during the reign of Vespasian. The province comprised Illyria/Dalmatia in the south and Pannonia in the north. Illyria included the area along the east coast of the Adriatic Sea and its inland mountains, eventually being named Dalmatia. Pannonia included the northern plains that now are a part of Serbia, Croatia and Hungary. The area roughly corresponded to part or all of the territories of today's Albania, Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Slovenia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julius Caesar's invasions of Britain</span> Military campaigns in 55 and 54 BC

In the course of his Gallic Wars, Julius Caesar invaded Britain twice: in 55 and 54 BC. On the first occasion, Caesar took with him only two legions, and achieved little beyond a landing on the coast of Kent. The second invasion consisted of 800 ships, five legions and 2,000 cavalry. The force was so imposing that the Celtic Britons did not contest Caesar's landing, waiting instead until he began to move inland. Caesar eventually penetrated into Middlesex and crossed the Thames, forcing the British warlord Cassivellaunus to pay tribute to Rome and setting up Mandubracius of the Trinovantes as a client king. The Romans then returned to Gaul without conquering any territory.

Titus Terrasidius was a Roman Knight of the Equestrian order and an officer of the cavalry in Julius Caesar's Legio VII Claudia. He and other officers of the legion were sent out to negotiate provisions for the winter of 56–55 BC; they were captured by Breton tribes who were then subjugated as Caesar describes in his Commentarii de Bello Gallico:

The occasion of that war was this: Publius Crassus, a young man, had taken up his winter-quarters with the seventh legion among the Andes, who border upon the Ocean. He, as there was a scarcity of corn in those parts, sent out some officers of cavalry [who would be equites], and several military tribunes [who would be of senatorial rank] among the neighbouring states, for the purpose of procuring corn and provision; in which number Titus Terrasidius was sent among the Esubii; Marcus Trebius Gallus among the Curiosolitae; Quintus Velanius, [and] Titus Silius, amongst the Veneti.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ancient Celtic warfare</span> Warfare of the Ancient Celts

Ancient Celtic warfare refers to the historical methods of warfare employed by various Celtic people and tribes from Classical antiquity through the Migration period.

Quiberon Bay is an area of sheltered water on the south coast of Brittany. The bay is in the Morbihan département.

Publius Licinius Crassus was one of two sons of Marcus Licinius Crassus, the so-called "triumvir", and Tertulla, daughter of Marcus Terentius Varro Lucullus. He belonged to the last generation of Roman nobiles who came of age and began a political career before the collapse of the Republic. His peers included Marcus Antonius, Marcus Junius Brutus, Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus, the poet Gaius Valerius Catullus, and the historian Gaius Sallustius Crispus.

The Namnetes were a Gallic tribe dwelling near the modern city of Nantes during the Iron Age and the Roman period.

The military campaigns of Julius Caesar were a series of wars that reshaped the political landscape of the Roman Republic, expanded its territories, and ultimately paved the way for the transition from republic to empire. The wars constituted both the Gallic Wars and Caesar's civil war.

References

1 2 3 Freeman, Philip (2008). Julius Caesar. Simon and Schuster. pp. 164–169. ISBN 978-1-4165-6588-8.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Hammond, Carolyn, ed. (1996). Caesar: The Gallic War . Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-283120-0.
1 2 3 4 Dodge, Theodore (1892). Caesar: A History of the Art of War Among the Romans Down to the End of the Roman Empire, With A Detailed Account of the Campaigns of Caius Julius Caesar. Houghton Mifflin Company. pp. 131–140.
1 2 Meier, Christian (1995). Caesar: A Biography. Translated by McLintock, David. Basic Books. pp. 273–275. ISBN 978-0-465-00894-0.
↑ Bonaparte, Napoleon (5 April 2018). Napoleon's Commentaries on the Wars of Julius Caesar: A New English Translation. Translated by Macguire, R. A. Pen and Sword Military. p. 16. One can only despise Caesar's treatment of the Senate of Vannes. This people had not revolted; they had provided hostages and promised to live quietly, but they were in possession of all their rights and liberties. They had indeed given Caesar grounds to make war against them, but not to violate the law of nations in their case and to misuse his victory in so atrocious a way. This conduct was not just; still less was it politic. Such means never achieve their aim; they anger and disgust the nations. The punishment of a few chief people is all that justice and policy permit; it is an important rule to treat prisoners well.
↑ Kiernan, Ben; Lemos, T. M.; Taylor, Tristan (2023). The Cambridge World History of Genocide: Volume 1, Genocide in the Ancient, Medieval and Premodern Worlds. Cambridge University Press. pp. 309–329.
↑ Raaflaub, Kurt (14 May 2021). "Caesar and Genocide: Confronting the Dark Side of Caesar's Gallic Wars". New England Classical Journal. 48 (1). doi:10.52284/NECJ/48.1/article/raaflaub . Retrieved 1 May 2024.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Freeman-1] 1 2 3 Freeman, Philip (2008). Julius Caesar. Simon and Schuster. pp. 164–169. ISBN 978-1-4165-6588-8.

[Commentarii-2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hammond, Carolyn, ed. (1996). Caesar: The Gallic War . Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-283120-0.

[Dodge-3] 1 2 3 4 Dodge, Theodore (1892). Caesar: A History of the Art of War Among the Romans Down to the End of the Roman Empire, With A Detailed Account of the Campaigns of Caius Julius Caesar. Houghton Mifflin Company. pp. 131–140.

[Meier-4] 1 2 Meier, Christian (1995). Caesar: A Biography. Translated by McLintock, David. Basic Books. pp. 273–275. ISBN 978-0-465-00894-0.

[5] Bonaparte, Napoleon (5 April 2018). Napoleon's Commentaries on the Wars of Julius Caesar: A New English Translation. Translated by Macguire, R. A. Pen and Sword Military. p. 16. One can only despise Caesar's treatment of the Senate of Vannes. This people had not revolted; they had provided hostages and promised to live quietly, but they were in possession of all their rights and liberties. They had indeed given Caesar grounds to make war against them, but not to violate the law of nations in their case and to misuse his victory in so atrocious a way. This conduct was not just; still less was it politic. Such means never achieve their aim; they anger and disgust the nations. The punishment of a few chief people is all that justice and policy permit; it is an important rule to treat prisoners well.

[6] Kiernan, Ben; Lemos, T. M.; Taylor, Tristan (2023). The Cambridge World History of Genocide: Volume 1, Genocide in the Ancient, Medieval and Premodern Worlds. Cambridge University Press. pp. 309–329.

[7] Raaflaub, Kurt (14 May 2021). "Caesar and Genocide: Confronting the Dark Side of Caesar's Gallic Wars". New England Classical Journal. 48 (1). doi:10.52284/NECJ/48.1/article/raaflaub . Retrieved 1 May 2024.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]