Being You: A New Science of Consciousness

Last updated

Being You: A New Science of Consciousness
Being You by Anil Seth hardback cover (2021).jpg
Author Anil Seth
LanguageEnglish
Genre Philosophy, psychology, neuroscience
Publisher Faber and Faber
Publication date
September 2, 2021 [p 1]
ISBN 978-0-57133-770-5

Being You: A New Science of Consciousness is a 2021 non-fiction book by neuroscientist Anil Seth, published by Faber and Faber. The book explores the author's theory of consciousness and the self. Seth also looks at the relationship between humans, animals, and the potential for machines to have consciousness.

Contents

The writing process took Seth three years, with support from the Wellcome Trust. The ideas in the book come from Seth's long-standing interest in understanding the mind, combined with research and discussions with his team in Sussex.

The book was well-received by major publications and was awarded Best Book of 2021 from Bloomberg and The Economist and Best Science Book of 2021 by The Guardian and the Financial Times . Critics praised the book for being rigorous and meticulous in its research, and Seth's writing style. However, some reviewers pointed out concerns with the language and approach towards solving consciousness used in the book.

Context

Anil Seth is a neuroscientist based out of Sussex, England. [p 2] Having been interested in consciousness since childhood, [p 3] and after finding Totoni's 1998 paper [fn 1] compelling, [p 4] he developed his theory of "causal density" [p 5] with a different mathematical foundation. [p 4]

In an interview with The Guardian , Seth stated he wanted to understand himself and others. [p 2] His multidisciplinary team in Sussex helped in writing the book, all wanting to develop a "satisfying scientific explanation of conscious experience." [p 2] He described Being You as a means to weave multiple threads of ideas together. [p 6]

The book took three years to write. [p 6] Seth said the process was difficult due to other commitments, but the Wellcome Trust provided him with an Engagement Fellowship which helped him find time to write. [p 7]

Summary

The book is split into six parts and various chapters, each giving a broad overview of various philosophical and scientific positions that Seth relates to his own conclusions. Personal stories are also used to illustrate his points. Seth's theory of consciousness consists of three parts: conscious level, conscious content, and conscious self.

Conscious level is Seth's measurement of how conscious a being is. He defines it as a multilayered increase or decrease of brain activity, ranging between brain death, being comatose, being awake, and non-ordinary mental states caused by psychedelics. Conscious content is what a being is conscious of, be it their senses, emotions, thoughts, or beliefs. Conscious self is the pure awareness of the self, consisting of multiple facets Seth defines by their core focus: bodily self, perspectival self, volitional self, narrative self, and social self. [fn 2] These facets usually exist simultaneously, and all can exist at the same time. Seth argues the brain uses Bayesian inference and predictive modelling [fn 3] to produce a "controlled hallucination" which is a subjective rendering of the inside and outside world. The brain makes predictions, sensory signals keep the predictions tied to their causes, and subjective experiences are created via "top-down" predictions rather than "bottom-up." [fn 4]

He proposes a new problem of consciousness that differs from David Chalmer's hard problem of consciousness. Instead of asking why or how beings experience qualia, Seth states we should focus on asking why a particular brain pattern of activity maps to a particular kind of conscious experience. His solution, as a physicalist and as a scientist, is through understanding the underlying biological processes of the brain through explaining, predicting, and controlling them.

Anil Seth's Theory of Consciousness [p 8]
Conscious ...DefinitionConsists ofBrain usesBrain ouputs
... LevelHow conscious a being is.From least to most conscious: brain death, comatose, awake, non-ordinary mental states (under the influence of psychedelics). Bayesian inference, predictive modelling (using generative models, perceptual hierarchies, precision weighting of sensory signals).Controlled hallucinations.
... ContentWhat a person is conscious of. Senses, emotions, thoughts, beliefs.
... SelfThe conscious awareness of the self.Bodily self, perspectival self, volitional self, narrative self, social self.
Problem of consciousness
DescriptionSolution
Why a particular brain pattern of activity maps to a particular kind of conscious experience.Understanding the underlying biological processes of the brain through explaining, predicting, and controlling them. The question of how and why these processes exist in the universe is not necessary.

Reception

General

Gaia Vince in her review for The Observer describes the book as a "meticulously researched" scientific exploration of people's souls. [1] She identifies key themes throughout the book, such as consciousness, in Seth's view, being any and all subjective experiences as a key component to human identity. Disagreements between "perceptual expectations" and "conscious experience", she states, is how we bypass William Blake's so-called "doors of perceptions". [1] These "doors", she writes, are seen in the dress phenomena and through the usage of hallucinogenics and virtual reality, which Seth discusses in the book. These altered states of mind influencing personal characteristics was shown to Vince through her grandfather's transition from a "funny, gentle man" into a stranger who "spoke inappropriately and unkindly" due to dementia. [1] Despite this, she finds the book exhilarating and thinks it would "become a seminal text." [1]

Writing in The Business Standard , the journalist Sams Wahid Shahat describes Seth's real problem of consciousness as a way to "dissolve" the hard problem. [2] He details this being done through the various thought experiments which Seth presents throughout the book, which demystifies the hard problem by looking at the underlying biological processes in the mind. Shahat states that Seth borrowed the prediction machine concept from Hermann von Helmholtz, and controlled hallucinations are a part of these predictive processes. He describes the five facets of the conscious self as "theoretically distinct and can be understood independently" but we able to perceive either multiple or all of these processes at the same time. [2] Shahat praises the book as an "intriguing and accessible journey into the realm of consciousness" and "compelling" if one ignores "the book's emphasis on idea judgments [over] idea generation." [2]

The science journalist Maddie Bender, writing for Scientific American , describes the book as "logically rigorous" to the point of almost being tedious, and observes Seth's likeliness to both discuss Kant as well as recent studies in detailing his theory of consciousness. [3] She praises his vivid descriptions of scientific experiments, preferring them to the "philosophical hypotheticals of false selves and teleportation" also present in the book. [3]

Scientific

The neuroscientist Felix Haas in his review published in World Literature Today believes Seth's position on the hard problem of consciousness to fall in the middle between the two positions of either finding the hard problem to be meaningful or meaningless; rather, Haas states Seth's view is "not think[ing] that the hard problem is inherently meaningless" while also finding direct confrontation to it to be unproductive. [4] In his view, Seth instead wants to focus on the "real" problem of consciousness which is “why a particular pattern of brain activity ... maps to a particular kind of conscious experience", which Haas claimed is a "pivotal role" in Seth's thought process. [4] Haas found Seth's description of error minimisation, which results in the brain receiving controlled hallucinations, to have magnitude, though whether it is for the field of neuroscience or to world in general is left unclear in his review. The book has the same issues of many other introductory texts, Haas claims, such as it contains detail that would be "exciting to the researcher" but "frustrating to the novice" and the author defending their own school of philosophy, but Haas praises the book as being "more careful yet bolder than others." [4] He concludes his review in describing it as a "fantastic exposition" of ideas gaining support in both neuroscience and artificial intelligence, and that while it is too early to write a definite book on the subject, "[Being You] has gotten closer to it than any other." [4]

Paul Thagard, writing for Psychology Today , reiterates Seth's alternative real problem for consciousness in his review and states any theory of consciousness must specify mechanisms that apply to external and internal sensations, emotions, and thoughts, while also engaging with each experience's neural theory. Thagard is critical of the Bayesian inference theory of consciousness which Seth employs in his book, stating "the brain is ... more than a prediction machine, ... evidence is lacking [for the theory], ... and how Bayesian predictions produce a full range of conscious experiences remains unspecified." [5] He is also critical of calling perceptions "controlled hallucinations", but compliments Seth's presentation of the problem and the inclusion of "many interesting discussions" in-regards to neuroscience. [5]

Philosophical

Writing a review for Naturalism.org, the naturalist philosopher Tom Clark praises the book for its writing and "entertaining insight" into questions such as why the brain creates controlled hallucinations, who or what is the self, and where else beyond human brains "does consciousness arise", especially in the context of predictive processing. [6] He agrees with Seth in-regard to qualia, that their phenomenology is real and not an illusion. The proposition that Seth provides, that the experience of consciousness does not exist in the real world, is one Clark finds extraordinary, and questions if the position of physicalism can state whether qualia is "identical to, or an emergent property" of neural ensembles and other physical vehicles. [6] Controlled hallucinations are, at least to Clark's understanding of the book, to control the behaviour of an individual, and concerns about experiences' role as causal controllers do not worry him "since its associated neural processes ... are already reliably in control." [6] He describes Seth as a "skeptic about contra-causal, libertarian free will", and affirms consciousness as natural phenomena, but claims Daniel Dennett might disagree with Seth on the unconditional nature of causal determinism and human agency. [6] Despite disagreements with Seth's methodology or conclusions, Clark ends his review with describing the book as a lively, "important and original contribution to understanding how conscious minds arise in the natural world." [6]

Julian Baggini, writing in The Wall Street Journal , states that if one could only read one book on consciousness, it should be Seth's. Believing most theories of consciousness are "doomed to fail" due to having the wrong focus, Baggini describes Seth's approach as neither addressing the hard or soft problem of consciousness, instead asking for the real problem of consciousness (discussed above). He argues Seth's prediction machine theory is not intended to be a definitive answer, and the problems of consciousness will "dissolve away" as science progresses. [7] While stating Seth is "meticulously precise" in his prose, Baggini questions if the terminology used in the book ("hallucination" and "fantasy") would invite misunderstandings, but concludes those concerns were minor. [7] Seth's chapter on free will, he says, should be read prior to any books on the subject, and he agrees with Seth when he wrote that "science has given back ... more" every time it refutes anthropocentrism. [7]

Awards

The book received various annual best book awards. It was chosen as one of the 49 Best Books of 2021 by Bloomberg, [8] one of the best books by The Economist , [9] one of the 8 Best Science Books of 2021 by The Guardian [10] and one of the best science books by the Financial Times , [11] and one of the 5 Best Philosophy Books of 2021 according to Nigel Warburton. [12]

Footnotes

  1. Tononi, G. (December 4, 1998). "Consciousness and Complexity". Science. 282 (5395): 1846–1851. doi:10.1126/science.282.5395.1846. PMID   9836628. Archived from the original on August 19, 2023. Retrieved July 14, 2023.
  2. Seth defines these like so:
    • Bodily self: the experience of being and having a body.
    • Perspectival self: the experience of first-person perspective of the world.
    • Volitional self: the experiences of intention and of agency.
    • Narrative self: the experience of being a continuous and distinctive person.
    • Social self: the experience of having a self refracted through the minds of others.
  3. Through the use of generative models, perceptual hierarchies (from large scale to low scale characteristics of something), and precision weighting of sensory signals (influence adjustment of each sense)
  4. Referring to how brain signals go from the inner brain (top) to the outside world via our senses (bottom) rather than the conventional view of the opposite occurring.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Consciousness</span> Awareness of existence

Consciousness, at its simplest, is awareness of internal and external existence. However, its nature has led to millennia of analyses, explanations and debate by philosophers, theologians, and all of science. Opinions differ about what exactly needs to be studied or even considered consciousness. In some explanations, it is synonymous with the mind, and at other times, an aspect of mind. In the past, it was one's "inner life", the world of introspection, of private thought, imagination and volition. Today, it often includes any kind of cognition, experience, feeling or perception. It may be awareness, awareness of awareness, or self-awareness either continuously changing or not. The disparate range of research, notions and speculations raises a curiosity about whether the right questions are being asked.

Epiphenomenalism is a position on the mind–body problem which holds that subjective mental events are completely dependent for their existence on corresponding physical and biochemical events within the human body, yet themselves have no influence over physical events. According to epiphenomenalism, the appearance that subjective mental states influence physical events is an illusion, consciousness being a by-product of physical states of the world. For instance, fear seems to make the heart beat faster, but according to epiphenomenalism the biochemical secretions of the brain and nervous system —not the experience of fear—is what raises the heartbeat. Because mental events are a kind of overflow that cannot cause anything physical, yet have non-physical properties, epiphenomenalism is viewed as a form of property dualism.

<i>Consciousness Explained</i> 1991 book by Daniel Dennett

Consciousness Explained is a 1991 book by the American philosopher Daniel Dennett, in which the author offers an account of how consciousness arises from interaction of physical and cognitive processes in the brain. Dennett describes consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. He compares consciousness to an academic paper that is being developed or edited in the hands of multiple people at one time, the "multiple drafts" theory of consciousness. In this analogy, "the paper" exists even though there is no single, unified paper. When people report on their inner experiences, Dennett considers their reports to be more like theorizing than like describing. These reports may be informative, he says, but a psychologist is not to take them at face value. Dennett describes several phenomena that show that perception is more limited and less reliable than we perceive it to be.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sentience</span> Ability to be aware of feelings and sensations

Sentience is the simplest or most primitive form of cognition, consisting of a conscious awareness of stimuli without association or interpretation. The word was first coined by philosophers in the 1630s for the concept of an ability to feel, derived from Latin sentiens (feeling), to distinguish it from the ability to think (reason).

Artificial consciousness (AC), also known as machine consciousness (MC), synthetic consciousness or digital consciousness, is the consciousness hypothesized to be possible in artificial intelligence. It is also the corresponding field of study, which draws insights from philosophy of mind, philosophy of artificial intelligence, cognitive science and neuroscience. The same terminology can be used with the term "sentience" instead of "consciousness" when specifically designating phenomenal consciousness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panpsychism</span> View that mind is a fundamental feature of reality

In the philosophy of mind, panpsychism is the view that the mind or a mind-like aspect is a fundamental and ubiquitous feature of reality. It is also described as a theory that "the mind is a fundamental feature of the world which exists throughout the universe". It is one of the oldest philosophical theories, and has been ascribed to philosophers including Thales, Plato, Spinoza, Leibniz, William James, Alfred North Whitehead, Bertrand Russell, and Galen Strawson. In the 19th century, panpsychism was the default philosophy of mind in Western thought, but it saw a decline in the mid-20th century with the rise of logical positivism. Recent interest in the hard problem of consciousness and developments in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and quantum mechanics have revived interest in panpsychism in the 21st century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hard problem of consciousness</span> Philosophical concept, first stated by David Chalmers in 1995

In the philosophy of mind, the hard problem of consciousness is to explain why and how humans and other organisms have qualia, phenomenal consciousness, or subjective experience. It is contrasted with the "easy problems" of explaining why and how physical systems give a (healthy) human being the ability to discriminate, to integrate information, and to perform behavioral functions such as watching, listening, speaking, and so forth. The easy problems are amenable to functional explanation—that is, explanations that are mechanistic or behavioral—since each physical system can be explained purely by reference to the "structure and dynamics" that underpin the phenomenon.

Electromagnetic theories of consciousness propose that consciousness can be understood as an electromagnetic phenomenon.

Bicameral mentality is a hypothesis introduced by Julian Jaynes who argued human ancestors as late as the ancient Greeks did not consider emotions and desires as stemming from their own minds but as the consequences of actions of gods external to themselves. The theory posits that the human mind once operated in a state in which cognitive functions were divided between one part of the brain which appears to be "speaking", and a second part which listens and obeys—a bicameral mind, and that the breakdown of this division gave rise to consciousness in humans. The term was coined by Jaynes, who presented the idea in his 1976 book The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind wherein he made the case that a bicameral mentality was the normal and ubiquitous state of the human mind as recently as 3,000 years ago, near the end of the Mediterranean bronze age.

Jeffrey Alan Gray was a British research psychologist. Probably his most important contribution to science and humanity is his biopsychological theory of personality. He is also notable for his contributions to the theory of consciousness.

The Philosophy of mind is a branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of the mind and its relation to the body and the external world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mind–body problem</span> Open question in philosophy of how abstract minds interact with physical bodies

The mind–body problem is a philosophical problem concerning the relationship between thought and consciousness in the human mind, and the body.

Primary consciousness is a term the American biologist Gerald Edelman coined to describe the ability, found in humans and some animals, to integrate observed events with memory to create an awareness of the present and immediate past of the world around them. This form of consciousness is also sometimes called "sensory consciousness". Put another way, primary consciousness is the presence of various subjective sensory contents of consciousness such as sensations, perceptions, and mental images. For example, primary consciousness includes a person's experience of the blueness of the ocean, a bird's song, and the feeling of pain. Thus, primary consciousness refers to being mentally aware of things in the world in the present without any sense of past and future; it is composed of mental images bound to a time around the measurable present.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qualia</span> Instances of subjective experience

In philosophy of mind, qualia are defined as instances of subjective, conscious experience. The term qualia derives from the Latin neuter plural form (qualia) of the Latin adjective quālis meaning "of what sort" or "of what kind" in relation to a specific instance, such as "what it is like to taste a specific apple — this particular apple now".

<i>The Conscious Mind</i> 1996 philosophy book by David Chalmers

The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory was published in 1996, and is the first book written by David Chalmers, an Australian philosopher specialising in philosophy of mind. Although the book has been greatly influential, Chalmers maintains that it is "far from perfect", as most of it was written as part of his PhD dissertation after "studying philosophy for only four years".

Interactionism or interactionist dualism is the theory in the philosophy of mind which holds that matter and mind are two distinct and independent substances that exert causal effects on one another. An example of your mind influencing your body would be if you are depressed, you can observe the effects on your body, such as a slouched posture, a lackluster smile, etc. Another example, this time of your body affecting your mind would be: If you struck your toe very forcefully on a door, you would experience terrible pain. Interactionism is one type of dualism, traditionally a type of substance dualism though more recently also sometimes a form of property dualism. Many philosophers and scientists have responded to this theory with arguments both supporting and opposing its relevance to life and whether the theory corresponds to reality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Integrated information theory</span> Theory within consciousness research

Integrated information theory (IIT) proposes a mathematical model for the consciousness of a system. It comprises a framework ultimately intended to explain why some physical systems are conscious, and to be capable of providing a concrete inference about whether any physical system is conscious, to what degree, and what particular experience it is having; why they feel the particular way they do in particular states, and what it would take for other physical systems to be conscious.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anil Seth</span> British neuroscientist

Anil Kumar Seth is a British neuroscientist and professor of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience at the University of Sussex. A proponent of materialist explanations of consciousness, he is currently amongst the most cited scholars on the topics of neuroscience and cognitive science globally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Donald D. Hoffman</span> American cognitive psychologist and popular science author

Donald David Hoffman is an American cognitive psychologist and popular science author. He is a professor in the Department of Cognitive Sciences at the University of California, Irvine, with joint appointments in the Department of Philosophy, the Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, and the School of Computer Science.

Models of consciousness are used to illustrate and aid in understanding and explaining distinctive aspects of consciousness. Sometimes the models are labeled theories of consciousness. Anil Seth defines such models as those that relate brain phenomena such as fast irregular electrical activity and widespread brain activation to properties of consciousness such as qualia. Seth allows for different types of models including mathematical, logical, verbal and conceptual models.

References

Primary

  1. "Being You (Hardback)". Faber. Archived from the original on July 12, 2023. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  2. 1 2 3 Adams, Tim; Seth, Anil (August 21, 2021). "Neuroscientist Anil Seth: 'We risk not understanding the central mystery of life'". The Observer. ISSN   0029-7712. Archived from the original on July 12, 2023. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  3. Seth, Anil (January 15, 2022). "On 'Being You'". Interalia Magazine. Archived from the original on July 12, 2023. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  4. 1 2 Seth 2021, pg. 51
  5. Seth, Anil K.; Barrett, Adam B.; Barnett, Lionel (October 13, 2011). "Causal density and integrated information as measures of conscious level". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 369 (1952): 3748–3767. Bibcode:2011RSPTA.369.3748S. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0079 . ISSN   1364-503X. PMID   21893526. S2CID   12788294.
  6. 1 2 Middlebrooks, Paul; Seth, Anil. "BI 117 Anil Seth: Being You | Brain Inspired". Archived from the original on July 12, 2023. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  7. Cooke, Emily; Seth, Anil (February 23, 2023). "How I wrote a popular science book about consciousness — and why (Interview with Anil Seth)". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00541-z. PMID   36823269. S2CID   257152610. Archived from the original on July 17, 2023. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
  8. Seth, Anil K. (November 2, 2016). "The hard problem of consciousness is a distraction from the real one". Aeon. Archived from the original on May 29, 2023. Retrieved August 19, 2023.

Secondary

  1. 1 2 3 4 Vince, Gaia (August 25, 2021). "Being You by Professor Anil Seth review – the exhilarating new science of consciousness". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on July 12, 2023. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  2. 1 2 3 Shahat, Sams Wahid (June 12, 2023). "Being You by Professor Anil Seth - A fascinating dive into the world of consciousness". The Business Standard. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
  3. 1 2 Bender, M. (2021). Being You: A New Science of Consciousness. Scientific American , 325(4), 87.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Haas, Felix (March 2022). "Being You: A New Science of Consciousness by Anil Seth". World Literature Today . 96 (2): 72–73. doi:10.1353/wlt.2022.0093. ISSN   1945-8134. S2CID   247162023.
  5. 1 2 Thagard, Paul (February 12, 2022). "The Real Problem of Consciousness | Psychology Today". www.psychologytoday.com. Archived from the original on August 19, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Clark, Tom. "Naturalizing Consciousness: Review of "Being You" by Anil Seth | Naturalism.org". Naturalism. Archived from the original on July 12, 2023. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  7. 1 2 3 Baggini, Julian (December 9, 2021). "'Being You' Review: Why We Have a Sense of Self". Wall Street Journal. ISSN   0099-9660. Archived from the original on July 12, 2023. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  8. "The 49 Most Fascinating, Mind-Blowing, Challenging, Hilarious, and Urgent Titles of the Year". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on March 16, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
  9. "The best books of 2021". The Economist. ISSN   0013-0613. Archived from the original on July 14, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
  10. Sample, Ian (December 7, 2021). "The best science books of 2021". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on July 13, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
  11. Cookson, Clive (November 16, 2021). "Best books of 2021: Science". Financial Times. Archived from the original on July 13, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
  12. Warburton, Nigel. "The Best Philosophy Books of 2021". Five Books. Archived from the original on July 13, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.