Blind Landing Experimental Unit

Last updated

The Blind Landing Experimental Unit, abbreviated BLEU, [1] was a unit of the British government tasked with creating an early autolanding system for military and civilian aircraft from the late 1940s until the mid-1960s. [2]

Contents

Background

Pilots in the early days of aviation relied on dead reckoning to find out where they were flying, which proved difficult or impossible at night or in bad weather. [3] A 1925 United States Post Office study found that 76% of its forced landings were due to weather, which highlighted the early need for a system to facilitate blind landings. Early suggestions at addressing the problem ranged from using primitive radio signals [4] to placing emergency landing strips periodically near major highways. [5] Experiences from the Second World War called more attention to the problem. Bombers based in Britain would sometimes return to their home bases in the early morning hours to find all of their landing sites completely fogged in, which resulted in the senseless loss of airframes and aircrews. In the post-war period, aviation experts knew that there would be benefits to both military and civilian flyers, as military missions would be made possible in all conditions and airlines could avoid the wasteful and expensive practice of diverting away from fogged in airports. [6] [7]

Several blind-landing systems had been developed in the pre-war era, notably the US Diamond-Dunmore system and the German Lorenz beam concepts. Both relied, to some degree, on the voice radios in the aircraft, which were common on larger aircraft of the era. Diamond-Dunmore appears to have seen no active uses, but the Lorenz system was deployed at major airports in Germany, the UK and other European locations and their related foreign fields. These generally operated in common medium-wave frequencies on the order of 300 to 400 kHz, frequencies that were, by the mid-war era, on the decidedly low-frequency range. The optical resolution of any system is a combination of the wavelength and the size of the antenna system, so using these frequencies resulted in relatively low accuracy. During the war, experiments were carried out with similar systems working at VHF frequencies around 100 MHz and a variety of such systems were used at many military airfields.

Origins of autoland

DZ203, the airplane used in system trials Boeing 247D DZ203.jpg
DZ203, the airplane used in system trials

Before the formation of BLEU, an automatic landing was made at the Telecommunications Flying Unit (TFU) of the TRE at RAF Defford in a Boeing 247D aircraft, DZ203 , early in 1945, using the American SCS 51 radio guidance system. Landings were made in complete darkness, with no landing lights and all other lights obscured by the wartime blackout. There was no flare-out; the low approach speed and shallow glide angle meant that the aircraft could be allowed to fly straight onto the ground. [8] [9] SCS 51 was the basis for the Instrument Landing System (ILS), adopted by ICAO in 1948. [10]

There was an alternative system to the SCS 51 from Col. Moseley and that was a radar-based system wholly devised, developed and trialled by F/O L. C. Barber and his colleagues at Defford. [11] This system effectively gave range and height data which could be added to autopilot heading info. [lower-alpha 1]

The Blind Landing Experimental Unit (BLEU) of the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE) was formed at RAF Woodbridge and RAF Martlesham Heath during 1945 and 1946. It was a multi-disciplinary unit, drawing staff from the RAE, Farnborough and the Telecommunications Research Establishment, Malvern (TRE). [12] The terms of reference were that the unit "will operate as a satellite of the RAE and will be responsible for the development on blind approach and landing of RAF, Naval and Civil aircraft". [13] Research during the first few years at BLEU led to the conclusion that a promising approach to blind landing would be a fully automatic system, and produced a definition of the requirements for such a system, later designated Autoland.

The Instrument Landing System (ILS) was introduced in the post-war era based on the SCS 51 concepts. This used two separate radio signals, one for lateral guidance, the "localizer" and the other for vertical guidance, the "glideslope". They both worked on the same basic principle; each of the signals was broadcast on a separate carrier frequency with a fixed relationship so that the glideslope frequency was always a fixed amount away from the localizer.

The signals were split on their way to their respective antennas and amplitude modulated with a low-frequency signal, 90 Hz or 150 Hz. The two signals were then sent out of directional antennas that produced large broadcast patterns aimed slightly left (90) and right (150) of the runway mid-line or above (90) and below (150) the glideslope. The patterns were relatively wide and aimed such that they overlapped in the center, indicating the proper line to fly.

While the system worked and was relatively simple to implement using 1940s technology, it was not accurate enough to provide guidance during landing, with accuracy on the order of a few hundred feet. ILS approaches ended at 200 feet over the runway, by which time the pilot had to be able to see the runway visually, or call off their approach. This was not nearly accurate enough for a truly automated system. [14] [15]

BLEU's first attempt at solving the problem was to place two cables, one mile long, extending along each side of the runway, similar to the Ambrose Channel pilot cable. A detector in the aircraft could see the signal from the cables and align itself very accurately along the midline of the runway. [16] For vertical guidance, a new FM radio altimeter that BLEU developed was capable of resolving height differences to 2 feet at low altitude. [17] The team safely conducted thousands of test landings using this system.

BLEU realized that most airports did not have room to place one-mile cables, so they continued working on a radio-driven solution. [14] [18] In collaboration with Smiths Industries Ltd., BLEU also developed coupling units to derive the commands to the autopilot from the guidance signals, and auto-throttle.

Components of the system were developed separately on several types of aircraft, including the Lancaster, Viking, Devon and the Albemarle. A demonstration of the techniques used was given to military and government representatives in May 1949. [19] By 1950 the entire system had been installed on a DH Devon and the first demonstration of Autoland was given on that aircraft on 3 July 1950. [20] Over the next 20 years, BLEU in conjunction with UK industry and the UK airworthiness authority, was responsible for almost all of the pioneering work needed to convert the concept of those experimental demonstrations into safe, accurate blind landings by large transport aircraft. [21] The system in use during the early 2000s is basically the same as that used experimentally in 1950. The following diagram, from J S Shayler's 1958 memorandum, shows how the different components of the system, and guidance signals, were used during the consecutive phases of an automatic landing.

Phases of the Automatic Landing System, as described by J S Shayler in 1958 Diagramautoland.jpg
Phases of the Automatic Landing System, as described by J S Shayler in 1958

BLEU during the 1950s and 1960s

During the early 1950s, as a preliminary to the development of the full Autoland system, automatic approach trials were carried out on Valetta, Meteor and Canberra aircraft. The Canberra, VN799, was acquired in 1953 but was a write-off following a crash landing in August that year due to a double engine failure, fortunately without serious injury to the crew.

At that time, Autoland had lower priority because efforts were concentrated on other projects including rapid landing of aircraft for RAF Fighter Command, visual aids for pilots, runway approach lighting and an approach aid using DME with Barbro. That changed when Operational Requirement 947 (OR947) for automatic landing on the V-Force bomber fleet was issued in 1954. [22] At that time the V-bomber force was the UK's main contribution to the strategic nuclear power of the west [23] and all-weather operation was essential. There was also renewed interest in automatic landing for civil aviation. As the next step in the development, the flare-out and coupling units from the Devon were linked to a Smiths Type D autopilot and installed in Varsity WF417, a much larger aircraft, capable of carrying 38 people rather than 10 in the Devon. The first fully automatic approach and landing was made by WF417 on 11 November 1954 under calm and misty conditions. [24] A similar system was installed in Canberra WE189 to provide the first application of Autoland to jet-type aircraft. [25] Automatic approaches [26] and automatic landings [27] were recorded by WE189 but the development was interrupted in April 1956 when the facilities at Woodbridge, which had the only suitable leader cable installation, ceased to be available to BLEU. Development of auto-flare and automatic kicking-off drift was continued at RAF Wittering, but in September that year WE189, returning from tests at Wittering, crashed due to engine failure on an approach when returning to its base at Martlesham Heath. The pilot, Flt. Lt. Les Coe, and the BLEU scientist in charge of the project, Mr. Joe Birkle, were killed.

Early in 1957 BLEU moved from Martlesham Heath to a newly equipped airfield at Thurleigh, the base for RAE Bedford. The development was continued in a third Canberra, WJ992, based on the results obtained with WE189. Experimental flights in WJ992 began late in 1957, leading to automatic landings with auto-throttle in March 1958. The following notes are from the logbook of the BLEU technologist carrying out the development: [28] 10 March 1958 (the 38th flight of that programme): "Very little drift, about 0.3g – heights 150-55-15-0". That was with manual throttle, but auto throttle was used on 12 March, in a strong crosswind. 17 March saw "strong tailwind, 20 – 25 kt., pronounced float" and on 20 June, after adjustments during a further 20 flights: "not bad – about 0.7 g nicely on main wheels – kicking off drift OK". Then on 26 June: "Throttles off at 50ft. Very pleasing results" and on 20 August "hands and feet off". Recordings of automatic landings in that aircraft started on 8 July 1958, flight no. 69. Results for automatic landings in Canberra aircraft were quoted by Wood in 1957 [29] and published by Charnley in 1959, as for a "medium size jet aircraft". [30] By October 1958, BLEU had completed over 2,000 fully automatic landings, mainly in the Canberra and Varsity aircraft. [31]

The V-bomber project to install and develop Autoland on Vulcan XA899, originally classified as Secret, ran in parallel with the Canberra and Varsity work. The first automatic landings in the Vulcan were made between December 1959 [32] and April 1960. [33] Trials were carried out later that year and the system was accepted for military service in 1961.

It was recognised that leader cable would be impractical at some airports, but that it could be dispensed with if improvements could be made to ILS. Some improvement resulted from a narrow beam localizer aerial system developed by BLEU during the early 1950s [34] and by 1958 automatic landings had been made using only ILS localiser for azimuth guidance. [35] That required a good site but by the early 1960s radically new aerial designs for the ILS transmitters developed by Standard Telephones & Cables (ST&C) improved ILS to an extent that leader cable could be dispensed with. [36]

For many years there had been discussions between the UK Ministry of Aviation and the US Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) on guidance aids for landing in poor visibility. The Americans favoured a "pilot in the loop" technique, with improved aids for the pilot, over the fully automatic system preferred in the UK. In 1961, to gain experience with "the BLEU automatic landing system" the FAA sent a Douglas DC-7 to RAE Bedford for the system to be installed and tested. After that and further tests on return to Atlantic City, the FAA were convinced and thereafter strongly supported a fully automatic solution to the all-weather problem which later was adopted internationally. [37]

Up to that stage the Autoland system had been realised only as a "single-lane" or single channel system, without any redundancy to protect against equipment failure. During the late 1950s and early 1960s increased cooperation between BLEU, the UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and companies in the aviation industry with BEA and BOAC led to the definition of safety requirements in terms of a specification for maximum tolerable failure rates. [38] In 1961, the UK Air Registration Board (ARB) of the CAA issued a working document BCAR 367 "Airworthiness Requirements for Autoflare and Automatic Landing" which formed the basis for the definitions for weather visibility categories adopted by ICAO in 1965. [39] In 1959, contracts were placed by BEA and BOAC to develop automatic landing, based on Autoland, for the Trident and the VC10. The Trident used a triplex system with no common elements, so that a failure in one of the three channels could be detected and that channel eliminated. "Nuisance disconnects" were an early problem with that system, eventually solved by the industry, using torque switches with a controlled degree of lost motion. The introduction of Autoland for Category 3 operation in BEA's Trident fleet required a huge effort by BEA, Hawker Siddeley Aviation, Smiths Industries and BLEU. [40] A triplex system was also developed by Smiths and BLEU for the RAF's Belfast freighter.

The VC10 used an Elliott duplicated monitored system. [41] Later, the Concorde system was basically an improved version of the VC10 one, benefiting from advances in electronic circuit technology during the late 1960s. By 1980, the Trident had carried out more than 50,000 in-service automatic landings. The VC10 accrued 3,500 automatic landings before use of the system was curtailed in 1974 for economic reasons. By 1980, Concorde had performed nearly 1,500 automatic landings in passenger service. [42]

BLEU (renamed the Operational Systems Division of RAE in 1974) continued to play a leading role in the development of aircraft guidance systems, using a variety of aircraft including DH Comet, BAC 1–11, HS 748 (to replace the Varsities, which had been the main "work horses" for BLEU experiments for more than a decade) and VC-10 until the closure of RAE Bedford in 1994.

BLEU system

BLEU knew that an ideal system would require components based on the ground and in aircraft. The former system would have to consist of a signal without the land use problems of the cable-based system or the accuracy issues of ILS. All incoming aircraft would need to be equipped with a sensor to receive the signal, a super-precise altimeter, and a reliable autopilot. [14] The barometric altimeters in use at the time were only capable of providing a rough estimate of altitude, so BLEU developed a plane-based radar altimeter to complement its beam so planes knew when to flare up for landing. [14]

BLEU's work resulted in an eponymous system for controlling airplane landings. [43] Flight Lieutenant Noel Adams made the first automatic landing on 3 July 1950 in BLEU's test plane, a Vickers Varsity. [14] After demonstrating the system's success, BLEU needed to prove that it was safe. The required standard was that any landing system could not cause more than one accident in every ten million landings. [44] BLEU's engineers continued refining the system as its test pilots made countless automated landings in the Varsity. When it was closed due to fog, they would make test landings at London Heathrow International Airport.

In his 1959 paper [45] John Charnley, then Superintendent of the BLEU, concluded a discussion of statistical results by saying that "It is fair to claim, therefore, that not only will the automatic system land the aircraft when the weather prevents the human pilot, it also performs the operation much more precisely". The system was approved for commercial use in 1964, and on 4 November 1964, Captain Eric Poole landed a British European Airways flight at Heathrow with visibility of 40 meters, which was the first use of the system to land a commercial flight in such severe conditions. [46]

Legacy

The BLEU played a vital role in the development of autolanding, and descendants of its system are still in use around the world today. [47] [48]

See also

Notes

  1. The full technical description of this is available in the archives at RAF Museum Hendon, reference X005-4863, and includes original photographic records of Boeing 247 DZ203.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radio navigation</span> Use of radio-frequency electromagnetic waves to determine position on the Earths surface

Radio navigation or radionavigation is the application of radio frequencies to determine a position of an object on the Earth, either the vessel or an obstruction. Like radiolocation, it is a type of radiodetermination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instrument landing system</span> Ground-based visual aid for landing

In aviation, the instrument landing system (ILS) is a precision radio navigation system that provides short-range guidance to aircraft to allow them to approach a runway at night or in bad weather. In its original form, it allows an aircraft to approach until it is 200 feet (61 m) over the ground, within a 12 mile (800 m) of the runway. At that point the runway should be visible to the pilot; if it is not, they perform a missed approach. Bringing the aircraft this close to the runway dramatically increases the range of weather conditions in which a safe landing can be made. Other versions of the system, or "categories", have further reduced the minimum altitudes, runway visual ranges (RVRs), and transmitter and monitoring configurations designed depending on the normal expected weather patterns and airport safety requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vickers VC10</span> British narrow-body airliner

The Vickers VC10 is a mid-sized, narrow-body long-range British jet airliner designed and built by Vickers-Armstrongs (Aircraft) Ltd and first flown at Brooklands, Surrey, in 1962. The VC10 is often compared to the larger Soviet Ilyushin Il-62, the two types being the only airliners to use a rear-engined quad layout, while the smaller business jet Lockheed JetStar also has this engine arrangement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Autopilot</span> System to maintain vehicle trajectory in lieu of direct operator command

An autopilot is a system used to control the path of an aircraft, marine craft or spacecraft without requiring constant manual control by a human operator. Autopilots do not replace human operators. Instead, the autopilot assists the operator's control of the vehicle, allowing the operator to focus on broader aspects of operations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Distance measuring equipment</span> Radio navigation technology used in aviation

In aviation, distance measuring equipment (DME) is a radio navigation technology that measures the slant range (distance) between an aircraft and a ground station by timing the propagation delay of radio signals in the frequency band between 960 and 1215 megahertz (MHz). Line-of-visibility between the aircraft and ground station is required. An interrogator (airborne) initiates an exchange by transmitting a pulse pair, on an assigned 'channel', to the transponder ground station. The channel assignment specifies the carrier frequency and the spacing between the pulses. After a known delay, the transponder replies by transmitting a pulse pair on a frequency that is offset from the interrogation frequency by 63 MHz and having specified separation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instrument landing system localizer</span> Horizontal guidance system

An instrument landing system localizer, or simply localizer, is a system of horizontal guidance in the instrument landing system, which is used to guide aircraft along the axis of the runway.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fireflash</span> Air-to-air missile

Fireflash was the United Kingdom's first air-to-air guided missile to see service with the Royal Air Force. Constructed by Fairey Aviation, the missile utilised radar beam riding guidance. Fireflash had relatively limited performance and required the launching aircraft to approach the target from a limited angle astern.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Critical area (aeronautics)</span> Airport area that must be clear to prevent against signal interference

In aviation, a critical area refers to a designated area of an airport that all aircraft, vehicles, persons or physical obstructions must remain clear of when one or more Instrument Landing Systems (ILS) are in use, to protect against signal interference or attenuation that may lead to navigation errors, or accident. Critical areas also protect the ILS system's internal monitoring.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instrument approach</span> Aircraft landing procedure

In aviation, an instrument approach or instrument approach procedure (IAP) is a series of predetermined maneuvers for the orderly transfer of an aircraft operating under instrument flight rules from the beginning of the initial approach to a landing, or to a point from which a landing may be made visually. These approaches are approved in the European Union by EASA and the respective country authorities and in the United States by the FAA or the United States Department of Defense for the military. The ICAO defines an instrument approach as "a series of predetermined maneuvers by reference to flight instruments with specific protection from obstacles from the initial approach fix, or where applicable, from the beginning of a defined arrival route to a point from which a landing can be completed and thereafter, if landing is not completed, to a position at which holding or en route obstacle clearance criteria apply."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Autoland</span> Automated aircraft landing procedure

In aviation, autoland describes a system that fully automates the landing procedure of an aircraft's flight, with the flight crew supervising the process. Such systems enable airliners to land in weather conditions that would otherwise be dangerous or impossible to operate in.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microwave landing system</span> All-weather, precision radio guidance system

The microwave landing system (MLS) is an all-weather, precision radio guidance system intended to be installed at large airports to assist aircraft in landing, including 'blind landings'. MLS enables an approaching aircraft to determine when it is aligned with the destination runway and on the correct glidepath for a safe landing. MLS was intended to replace or supplement the instrument landing systems (ILS). MLS has a number of operational advantages over ILS, including a wider selection of channels to avoid interference with nearby installations, excellent performance in all weather, a small "footprint" at the airports, and wide vertical and horizontal "capture" angles that allowed approaches from wider areas around the airport.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Precision approach radar</span> Type of radar guidance system

Precision approach radar orPAR is a type of radar guidance system designed to provide lateral and vertical guidance to an aircraft pilot for landing, until the landing threshold is reached. Controllers monitoring the PAR displays observe each aircraft's position and issue instructions to the pilot that keep the aircraft on course and glidepath during final approach. After the aircraft reaches the decision height (DH) or decision altitude (DA), further guidance is advisory only. The overall concept is known as ground-controlled approach (GCA), and this name was also used to refer to the radar systems in the early days of its development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Local-area augmentation system</span> All-weather aircraft landing system

The local-area augmentation system (LAAS) is an all-weather aircraft landing system based on real-time differential correction of the GPS signal. Local reference receivers located around the airport send data to a central location at the airport. This data is used to formulate a correction message, which is then transmitted to users via a VHF Data Link. A receiver on an aircraft uses this information to correct GPS signals, which then provides a standard instrument landing system (ILS)-style display to use while flying a precision approach. The FAA has stopped using the term LAAS and has transitioned to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) terminology of ground-based augmentation system (GBAS). While the FAA has indefinitely delayed plans for federal GBAS acquisition, the system can be purchased by airports and installed as a Non-Federal navigation aid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transponder landing system</span> All-weather, precision landing system

A transponder landing system (TLS) is an all-weather, precision landing system that uses existing airborne transponder and instrument landing system (ILS) equipment to create a precision approach at a location where an ILS would normally not be available.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RAF Martlesham Heath</span> Former RAF station 1917–1963

Royal Air Force Martlesham Heath or more simply RAF Martlesham Heath is a former Royal Air Force station located 1.5 miles (2.4 km) southwest of Woodbridge, Suffolk, England. It was active between 1917 and 1963, and played an important role in the development of Airborne Interception radar.

In aviation, a ground-controlled approach (GCA) is a type of service provided by air-traffic controllers whereby they guide aircraft to a safe landing, including in adverse weather conditions, based on primary radar images. Most commonly, a GCA uses information from either a precision approach radar or an airport surveillance radar. The term GCA may refer to any type of ground radar guided approach such as a PAR, PAR without glideslope or ASR. When both vertical and horizontal guidance from the PAR is given, the approach is termed a precision approach. If no PAR glidepath is given, even if PAR equipment is used for lateral guidance, it is considered a non-precision approach.

The Aeroplane and Armament Experimental Establishment (A&AEE) was a research facility for British military aviation from 1918 to 1992. Established at Martlesham Heath, Suffolk, the unit moved in 1939 to Boscombe Down, Wiltshire, where its work continues following privatisation as part of the Qinetiq company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hawker Siddeley Trident</span> British trijet T-tail airliner

The Hawker Siddeley HS-121 Trident is a British airliner produced by Hawker Siddeley. In 1957, de Havilland proposed its DH.121 trijet design to a British European Airways (BEA) request. By 1960, de Havilland had been acquired by Hawker Siddeley. The Trident's maiden flight happened on 9 January 1962, and it was introduced on 1 April 1964, two months after its main competitor, the Boeing 727. By the end of the programme in 1978, 117 Tridents had been produced. The Trident was withdrawn from service in 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instrument landing system glide path</span> Aircraft guidance system

In aviation, instrument landing system glide path, commonly referred to as a glide path (G/P) or glide slope (G/S), is "a system of vertical guidance embodied in the instrument landing system which indicates the vertical deviation of the aircraft from its optimum path of descent".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DZ203</span> Test aircraft

DZ203, a Boeing 247 airliner, was among the most important single aircraft used in the development of various airborne radar and blind landing systems. It is particularly notable as the first aircraft to perform a completely automatic approach and landing, in January 1945.

References

  1. Oxford Dictionary of Abbreviations. Oxford University Press. 1998. p. 60. ISBN   978-0-19-280073-2.
  2. James Fuller (29 November 2012). Safety Was No Accident: History of the Uk Civil Aviation Flying Unit Cafu 1944 -1996. Trafford Publishing. p. 152. ISBN   978-1-4669-6893-6.
  3. G. C. Peden (8 February 2007). Arms, Economics and British Strategy: From Dreadnoughts to Hydrogen Bombs. Cambridge University Press. p. 66. ISBN   978-1-139-46292-1.
  4. "Achievements for 1932". Science News Letter: 399. 24 December 1932.
  5. Hearst Magazines (April 1938). "Popular Mechanics". Popular Mechanics. Hearst Magazines: 544. ISSN   0032-4558.
  6. ewen Tenby (3 March 2010). Miscellany. Lulu.com. p. 329. ISBN   978-1-4092-1833-3.
  7. Conway, Eric M. (October 2001). "The Politics of Blind Landing". Technology and Culture. 42: 81–106. doi:10.1353/tech.2001.0010. S2CID   109967435.
  8. R W Howard (1973) Automatic flight controls in fixed-wing aircraft – The first 100 years, The Aeronautical Journal, November 1973, p. 549
  9. McDonald J A (1964) Flight International, Letters, p. 727 30 April 1964
  10. Sir John Charnley (1989) Presidential Address: Navigation Aids to Aircraft – All-weather Landing, The Journal of Navigation, Vol. 42, No. 2 p. 166 http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0373463300014405
  11. T.F.U. Report 70, February 1945. Report on Controlled Approaches and Landing Trials carried out at Defford, Nov. 1944 – Feb. 1945. [UK National Archives AVIA 7/1599]
  12. Michael D. Dobson ed., (2001), Wings over Thurleigh, ISBN   0-9541594-0-3 Chapter 8 p. 123
  13. T. W. Prescott (1976) BLEU – The first decade. RAE Tech. Memo, FS 77 p. 21 [UK National Archives AVIA 6/25422]
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Graham Perry (September 2004). Flying People: Bringing You Safe Flying, Every Day. kea publishing. ISBN   978-0-9518958-6-3.
  15. J. S. Shayler (January 1961) Radio Guidance Elements of the B.L.E.U. Automatic Landing System for Aircraft, Journal Brit. I.R.E., U.D.C 621.396.933.23.
  16. Reed Business Information (7 December 1961). New Scientist. Reed Business Information. p. 601. ISSN   0262-4079.{{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  17. J. S. Shayler (1958) The application to civil aviation of an automatic landing system, R.A.E Technical Note No. BL.47 pp 4 & 8. [UK National Archives AVIA 6/17826]
  18. Reed Business Information (29 November 1962). New Scientist. Reed Business Information. p. 490. ISSN   0262-4079.{{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  19. B.L.E.U. Operation Order No. 1/49, 12 May 1949 [UK National Archives AIR 29/1295]
  20. Michael D. Dobson ed., (2001) Ibid. p. 126
  21. Sir John Charnley (1989) Ibid. p. 165
  22. T. W. Prescott (1976) Ibid. p. 19
  23. Defence White Paper, 1960, para. 36 [UK National Archives CAB 129/100]
  24. RAF Martlesham Heath, Operations Record Books, 1951–1955 [UK National Archives AIR 29/2364]
  25. T. W. Prescott (1976) Ibid. p. 41
  26. J. W. Birkle (1956) Automatic Approach Tests of a Type D Autopilot in a Canberra T.4 Aircraft at Woodbridge Airfield, R.A.E. Technical Note No: BL.41 [UK National Archives DSIR 23/24675]
  27. RAF Martlesham Heath, Operations Record Books, 1956–1957 [UK National Archives AIR 29/2860]
  28. Copy of Logbook for D. R. Easson, Scientist BLEU 1955 – 1958. Martlesham Aviation Museum document A2669/D1350
  29. RAE Technical Note No. BL 46, K A Wood, March 1957. Notes on a visit to Rome Air Development Centre, U.S.A., for demonstration of automatic ground controlled landing (August 1956) p. 17. [UK National Archives DSIR 23/25560]
  30. W. J. Charnley (1959). Ibid. p 127
  31. W. J. Charnley (1959) ibid. p. 127
  32. RAE Bedford Operations Record Books [UK National Archives AIR 29/2990]
  33. Flt. Lt. A J Camp AFC (1999) Testing Times, FlyPast, April 1999
  34. W. Makinson (1953) All-Weather Landings, Flight, 18 December, pp. 805–806 http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1953/1953%20-%201651.html
  35. J. S. Shayler (1958) Ibid. p.8
  36. Michael D. Dobson ed., (2001) Ibid. p. 137
  37. Michael D. Dobson ed., (2001) Ibid. p. 148
  38. Sir John Charnley (1989) Ibid. p. 172
  39. Wragg, David W. (1973). A Dictionary of Aviation (first ed.). Osprey. p. 44. ISBN   9780850451634.
  40. K. J. Wilkinson (1970) Automatic Landing in BEA's Trident Operations – a Review of Effort and achievement, The Aeronautical Journal, March 1970, Vol. 74, Number 711, pp. 187–196
  41. R W Howard (1973) Ibid. p. 556
  42. R W Howard (1980) Progress in the use of automatic flight controls in safety critical applications, The Aeronautical Journal, October 1980, p. 318
  43. Hearst Magazines (February 1965). "Popular Mechanics". Popular Mechanics. Hearst Magazines: 113–114. ISSN   0032-4558.
  44. Reed Business Information (10 February 1972). New Scientist. Reed Business Information. p. 322. ISSN   0262-4079.{{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  45. W. J. Charnley (1959). Blind Landing. Journal of Navigation, Vol. 12, No.2, April 1959, p 128 doi : 10.1017/S037346330001794X http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S037346330001794X
  46. Reed Business Information (13 November 1975). New Scientist. Reed Business Information. p. 398. ISSN   0262-4079.{{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  47. R. P. G. Collinson (1 January 2011). Introduction to Avionics Systems. Springer. p. 434. ISBN   978-94-007-0708-5.
  48. Charnley, Sir John (2011). "The RAE Contribution to All-Weather Landing". Journal of Aeronautical History. 1.