Canadian Medical Protective Association

Last updated
Canadian Medical Protective Association
TypeNon-profit organization / Special Act Corporation
PurposeTo protect the professional integrity of physicians and promote safe medical care in Canada
HeadquartersOttawa, Ontario, Canada
Executive Director / CEO
Lisa Calder
Website cmpa-acpm.ca

The Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) is a membership-based, not-for-profit organization that provides legal defence, liability protection, and risk-management education for physicians in Canada. The CMPA also provides compensation to patients and their families proven to have been harmed by negligent medical care (fault in Québec). [1] In 2016, the CMPA's membership list totaled 95,691 physicians. [2]

Contents

The organization has its headquarters in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

History

Early days

Founded at the 1901 annual meeting of the Canadian Medical Association, the CMPA was incorporated by an Act of Parliament on 27 February 1913, and given Royal Assent on 16 May 1913. [3]

On its 100th anniversary, the CMPA published A History of the Canadian Medical Protective Association 1901-2001. [4] This document contains excerpts from the earliest CMPA annual reports. From pages 7–9:

Object of the New Association Dr. R.W. Powell, who was the first president of the CMPA, retained the position for 33 years. Dr. Powell’s annual reports optimistically predicted the CMPA would be a large and important organization while describing the difficulties in increasing the membership. His reports are interspersed with harangues on recruiting new members and the 1911 annual report boasted: We have struck terror into the evil minded who have sought to besmirch and even blackmail members of our noble profession. The business of the CMPA was and still is protecting physicians, which it does by hiring the best legal help. Testament to the calibre of the legal assistance is evidenced by the number of CMPA counsel who have been appointed to the bench in provincial and federal courts through the years.

Incorporation - A Stormy Passage The Act of Incorporation generated considerable lively debate in both the House of Commons and Senate of Canada. Members of Parliament received petitions objecting to it. Feelings ran high. An MP said in debate: I think this legislation is dangerous. It is legislation against the interests of the mass of the people, and is the creation of a monopolistic corporation... against the rights of the individual in the matter of the selection of his method of cure and treatment in the case of disease. Speaking about protecting the rights of the individual, another MP summed up: If the individual realizes that instead of going up against a man whom he believes to be guilty, he has to go up against a strong corporation composed of the medical men of the country, with a fund at their disposal to fight such cases, I think he will feel that an injustice is being done. There was also concern about recruiting physicians to support a plaintiff's case in court.

Consistent Core Values Dr Powell often reiterated the value: Our organization does not consist in the fights we have put up or in the open success we have had but rather in the silent influence we have swayed against litigants who for a money gain have sought to blast the reputation of conscientious, painstaking and reputable practitioners knowing or suspecting that they have an easy mark and that to avoid publicity a medical man will often submit to what amounts to blackmail. These litigants have found out that our Counsel stands ready to accept service of the writ and your Executive stands ready with a bank account to furnish the sinews of war. Dozens and dozens of cases have thus been strangled at their inception and have disappeared like dew off the grass. This feature gentlemen is the strength and glory of your association. (CMPA Annual Report, 1919)

The CMPA co-sponsored the 10th Annual International Conference on Medical Regulation, which took place at the Ottawa Convention Centre in October 2012. [5]

Governance

The CMPA is a Special Act corporation because it was established by virtue of an Act of Canadian Parliament. The CMPA is not a regulated insurer. It offers medico-legal services to members, defined in the act as licensed physicians practicing in Canada. Unlike some insurers, the CMPA offers discretionary medico-legal assistance and follows by-laws dictating how and when it can offer its services. [6]

In its Strategic Plan, [7] the CMPA's stated mission is "To protect the professional integrity of physicians and promote safe medical care in Canada." To that end, the CMPA seeks to resolve medico-legal matters on behalf of its member, identify and promote practices that reduce physicians' medical liability risk, identify system-level changes to reduce adverse events, and support public policy that contributes to an effective and sustainable medical liability system.

Patient safety

In recent years the CMPA has promoted itself as a contributor to safer medical care, by claiming to reduce the number and severity of adverse medical events. Each year the CMPA hosts a series of "risk management" conferences and symposia for Canadian physicians, delivers approximately 400 customized workshops, and publishes a quarterly magazine (CMPA Perspective), among other activities. [ citation needed ]

The CMPA partners with the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) to develop programs and tools aimed at improving patient safety: Canadian Disclosure Guidelines, CPSI Safety Competencies, Canadian Patient Safety Officer Course, Patient Safety Education Program, and the Advancing Safety for Patients in Residency (ASPIRE) program. [8]

Nevertheless, as noted by the 2008 Canadian Healthcare Safety Symposium, there is more work to be done to improve patient safety:

The progress of the patient safety movement is being stymied by regulatory, structural and attitudinal problems, according to speakers at the eighth annual Canadian Healthcare Safety Symposium. A 'huge gulf' exists between the number of Canadian patients injured by negligence and those who receive compensation, said University of Alberta law professor Gerald Robertson. 'One must seriously question the efficacy of a model which compensates so few who are entitled to it.' Only about 2% of patients injured by negligence in Canada receive compensation, he said, basing his calculation on figures from the Canadian Medical Protective Association research estimating the number of preventable adverse events in Canadian hospitals. Meanwhile, the number of lawsuits against Canadian doctors is dropping — down 30% since 1998 (from 1339 suits commenced in 1998, to 928 suits in 2007) — and only 30% of plaintiffs seeking compensation are successful in court, Robertson noted. Medical negligence cases are complex, time-consuming, expensive and almost always undertaken on a contingency-fee basis. As a result, lawyers are unlikely to take on cases unless there is a chance of a settlement valued over $100 000, he said, noting that lawyers usually seek a fee equal to 30% of a successful settlement. The patient-safety movement may 'raise consciousness' about the need for better compensation for patients, since it will likely raise awareness about the frequency of adverse medical events. [9]

One claimant who received compensation, Campbellford resident John Lewis, said "one of the main barriers to patient safety in this country" is the Canadian Medical Protective Association. "It's extremely powerful because of the political influence it wields." [10]

Critics of loser-pays rules and bans on contingency fees say such efforts discriminate against patients who can't afford to pursue a claim. However, Canada's loser-pays rule is rarely invoked by the CMPA, largely because most plaintiffs are not in a position to pay. [11]

Liability protection

The CMPA describes itself as a "mutual defence" organization for doctors. In other words, it is not an insurance company. There is no contract between the CMPA and member physicians ensuring that the CMPA pays damages to victims of medical malpractice. When a doctor is brought before the Canadian justice system, the doctor's legal defence is funded by the CMPA, which uses its discretion on the cases it takes. The CMPA may defend a doctor sued in civil court for medical negligence causing injury, and may also defend a doctor charged in criminal court for offenses ranging from financial fraud (such as over-billing), to malfeasance, sexual battery, and felony crimes. [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]

CMPA - National Statistics 2012
ActionNumber
Legal actions commenced869
Legal actions proceeding to trial → won by the patient10
Legal actions proceeding to trial → won by the doctor63
Legal actions settled out of court444
Legal actions dismissed, discontinued, or abandoned514

The national statistics for negligence lawsuits shown in the table (right) are from the 2012 CMPA Annual Report. [17] The CMPA does not distinguish between lawsuits which are dismissed, discontinued, or abandoned, but provides only an accumulated total for this category. A lawsuit may be dismissed by the courts, or a lawyer may inform a plaintiff that there is no reasonable chance of success with a lawsuit, in which case it may be abandoned or discontinued. Often, a Statement of Claim is filed years before the case is resolved, thus the number of actions commenced in a given year need not equal the sum of the resolved cases in that year.

Financing

Doctors pay annual membership fees to the CMPA. Provincial governments reimburse a portion of those fees as part of negotiated contracts with provincial medical associations, in lieu of other forms of compensation provided to Canadian physicians.

Membership fees, together with investment income, have enabled the CMPA to acquire a $2.6 billion reserve fund used to provide doctors with legal defence for cases in which the CMPA deems are defensible. CMPA funds are also used to provide compensation, in the form of awards and settlements, to patients and their families found to have been harmed by negligent clinical care. In 2012, CMPA paid out $249 million in awards and settlements. [17]

No-fault medical compensation

When the CMPA was incorporated there was an imbalance of knowledge between doctor and patient, which in turn led to what may be considered an imbalance of power in the doctor-patient relationship. Some point to abuse by MDs, both in the healthcare system [18] [19] and in the court system. [20] [21] The arrival of the internet brought a sea change. [22] [23] Today, objective medical information is so readily available that patients no longer need to live in a city with a university medical library to become informed about their own health conditions. Doctor rating sites have sprung up, covering every continent. [24] [25] The skill level of MDs, or lack thereof, may be exposed on such sites. [26] [27] Doctors need to keep up to date with technical advances in their field, and demonstrate high ethical standards. [28] [29] Patients, meanwhile, are demanding a medical Glasnost of transparency and accountability. [30] [31] [32]

Some critics of the current system want to replace the current tort-based system with a so-called "no-fault" medical compensation system. In 2008, the Canadian Medical Association Journal printed a three-part series on this topic. [33] [34] [35] In 2008, Healthcare Quarterly published "Giving Back the Pen: Disclosure, Apology and Early Compensation After Harm in the Health Care Setting." The title refers to a comment made by Bishop Desmond Tutu regarding the importance of restitution after harm: If you take my pen and say you are sorry and don't give me back my pen, nothing has happened. [36]

In 2005 the CMPA published a comparative analysis of medical liability systems internationally, including in countries with "no fault" systems. It called for "common sense reforms" within the current tort-based compensation system, concluding that Canada's current system is fundamentally sound and "is very likely the best possible model for our circumstances." [37]

See also

Related Research Articles

A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. Tort law can be contrasted with criminal law, which deals with criminal wrongs that are punishable by the state. While criminal law aims to punish individuals who commit crimes, tort law aims to compensate individuals who suffer harm as a result of the actions of others. Some wrongful acts, such as assault and battery, can result in both a civil lawsuit and a criminal prosecution in countries where the civil and criminal legal systems are separate. Tort law may also be contrasted with contract law, which provides civil remedies after breach of a duty that arises from a contract. Obligations in both tort and criminal law are more fundamental and are imposed regardless of whether the parties have a contract.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare (Canada)</span> Canadas publicly funded, single-payer health care system

Medicare is an unofficial designation used to refer to the publicly funded single-payer healthcare system of Canada. Canada's health care system consists of 13 provincial and territorial health insurance plans, which provide universal healthcare coverage to Canadian citizens, permanent residents, and depending on the province or territory, certain temporary residents. The systems are individually administered on a provincial or territorial basis, within guidelines set by the federal government. The formal terminology for the insurance system is provided by the Canada Health Act and the health insurance legislation of the individual provinces and territories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Good Samaritan law</span> Legal protection for rescuers

Good Samaritan laws offer legal protection to people who give reasonable assistance to those who are, or whom they believe to be injured, ill, in peril, or otherwise incapacitated. The protection is intended to reduce bystanders' hesitation to assist, for fear of being sued or prosecuted for unintentional injury or wrongful death. An example of such a law in common-law areas of Canada: a Good Samaritan doctrine is a legal principle that prevents a rescuer who has voluntarily helped a victim in distress from being successfully sued for wrongdoing. Its purpose is to keep people from being reluctant to help a stranger in need for fear of legal repercussions should they make some mistake in treatment. By contrast, a duty to rescue law requires people to offer assistance and holds those who fail to do so liable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Life support</span> In medicine

Life support comprises the treatments and techniques performed in an emergency in order to support life after the failure of one or more vital organs. Healthcare providers and emergency medical technicians are generally certified to perform basic and advanced life support procedures; however, basic life support is sometimes provided at the scene of an emergency by family members or bystanders before emergency services arrive. In the case of cardiac injuries, cardiopulmonary resuscitation is initiated by bystanders or family members 25% of the time. Basic life support techniques, such as performing CPR on a victim of cardiac arrest, can double or even triple that patient's chance of survival. Other types of basic life support include relief from choking, staunching of bleeding by direct compression and elevation above the heart, first aid, and the use of an automated external defibrillator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Publicly funded health care</span> Form of health care financing

Publicly funded healthcare is a form of health care financing designed to meet the cost of all or most healthcare needs from a publicly managed fund. Usually this is under some form of democratic accountability, the right of access to which are set down in rules applying to the whole population contributing to the fund or receiving benefits from it.

The Canadian Medical Association is a national, voluntary association of physicians and medical learners that advocates on national health matters. Its primary mandate is to drive positive change in health care by advocating on key health issues facing doctors and their patients.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Canada</span> Overview of healthcare

Healthcare in Canada is delivered through the provincial and territorial systems of publicly funded health care, informally called Medicare. It is guided by the provisions of the Canada Health Act of 1984, and is universal. The 2002 Royal Commission, known as the Romanow Report, revealed that Canadians consider universal access to publicly funded health services as a "fundamental value that ensures national health care insurance for everyone wherever they live in the country."

Medical malpractice is professional negligence by act or omission by a health care provider in which the treatment provided falls below the accepted standard of practice in the medical community and causes injury or death to the patient, with most cases involving medical error. Claims of medical malpractice, when pursued in US courts, are processed as civil torts. Sometimes an act of medical malpractice will also constitute a criminal act, as in the case of the death of Michael Jackson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Personal injury</span> Legal term for an injury to a person

Personal injury is a legal term for an injury to the body, mind, or emotions, as opposed to an injury to property. In common law jurisdictions the term is most commonly used to refer to a type of tort lawsuit in which the person bringing the suit has suffered harm to their body or mind. Personal injury lawsuits are filed against the person or entity that caused the harm through negligence, gross negligence, reckless conduct, or intentional misconduct, and in some cases on the basis of strict liability. Different jurisdictions describe the damages in different ways, but damages typically include the injured person's medical bills, pain and suffering, and diminished quality of life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-economic damages caps</span> Limitations in lawsuits

Non-economic damages caps are tort reforms to limit damages in lawsuits for subjective, non-pecuniary harms such as pain, suffering, inconvenience, emotional distress, loss of society and companionship, loss of consortium, and loss of enjoyment of life. This is opposed to economic damages, which encompasses pecuniary harms such as medical bills, lost wages, lost future income, loss of use of property, costs of repair or replacement, the economic value of domestic services, and loss of employment or business opportunities. Non-economic damages should not be confused with punitive or exemplary damages, which are awarded purely to penalise defendants and do not aim to compensate either pecuniary or non-pecuniary losses.

Defensive medicine, also called defensive medical decision making, refers to the practice of recommending a diagnostic test or medical treatment that is not necessarily the best option for the patient, but mainly serves to protect the physician against the patient as potential plaintiff. Defensive medicine is a reaction to the rising costs of malpractice insurance premiums and patients’ biases on suing for missed or delayed diagnosis or treatment but not for being overdiagnosed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medical Defence Union</span>

The Medical Defence Union (MDU) is one of three major medical defence organisations (MDOs) in the United Kingdom, offering professional medical indemnity for clinical negligence claims and advice provided by medico-legal experts for its members. It is a mutual not for profit organisation.

Patient safety is a discipline that emphasizes safety in health care through the prevention, reduction, reporting and analysis of error and other types of unnecessary harm that often lead to adverse patient events. The frequency and magnitude of avoidable adverse events, often known as patient safety incidents, experienced by patients was not well known until the 1990s, when multiple countries reported significant numbers of patients harmed and killed by medical errors. Recognizing that healthcare errors impact 1 in every 10 patients around the world, the World Health Organization (WHO) calls patient safety an endemic concern. Indeed, patient safety has emerged as a distinct healthcare discipline supported by an immature yet developing scientific framework. There is a significant transdisciplinary body of theoretical and research literature that informs the science of patient safety with mobile health apps being a growing area of research.

Sham peer review or malicious peer review is a name given to the abuse of a medical peer review process to attack a doctor for personal or other non-medical reasons. The American Medical Association conducted an investigation of medical peer review in 2007 and concluded that while it is easy to allege misconduct and 15% of surveyed physicians indicated that they were aware of peer review misuse or abuse, cases of malicious peer review able to be proven through the legal system are rare.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tort reform</span> Legal reforms aimed at reducing tort litigation

Tort reform consists of changes in the civil justice system in common law countries that aim to reduce the ability of plaintiffs to bring tort litigation or to reduce damages they can receive. Such changes are generally justified under the grounds that litigation is an inefficient means to compensate plaintiffs; that tort law permits frivolous or otherwise undesirable litigation to crowd the court system; or that the fear of litigation can serve to curtail innovation, raise the cost of consumer goods or insurance premiums for suppliers of services, and increase legal costs for businesses. Tort reform has primarily been prominent in common law jurisdictions, where criticism of judge-made rules regarding tort actions manifests in calls for statutory reform by the legislature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Choosing Wisely</span> U.S.-based educational campaign

Choosing Wisely is a United States-based health educational campaign, led by the ABIM Foundation, about unnecessary health care.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medical malpractice</span> Legal cause of action when health professionals deviate from standards of practice harming a patient

Medical malpractice is a legal cause of action that occurs when a medical or health care professional, through a negligent act or omission, deviates from standards in their profession, thereby causing injury or death to a patient. The negligence might arise from errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare or health management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Physicians in Canada</span> Canadian physician

Physicians and surgeons play an important role in the provision of health care in Canada. They are responsible for the promotion, maintenance, and restoration of health through the study, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of disease, injury, and other physical and mental impairments. As Canadian medical schools solely offer the Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) or Doctor of Medicine and Master of Surgery degrees, these represent the degrees held by the vast majority of physicians and surgeons in Canada, though some have a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (D.O.) from the United States or Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery from Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health Care In Danger</span> Red Cross campaign

Health Care In Danger is a campaign organized by the International Committee of the Red Cross that highlights violent attacks on patients, healthcare workers, and healthcare facilities in conflict zones.

Canadian Doctors for Medicare is a Canadian non-profit advocacy organization that was founded in Toronto in 2006. The organization argues against the privatization of healthcare.

References

  1. ↑ Canadian Medical Protective Association. "Empowering better healthcare | What we do | The Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA)". CMPA. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
  2. ↑ 2016 CMPA Annual Report
  3. ↑ CMPA Act of Incorporation 1913.
  4. ↑ A History of the Canadian Medical Protective Association 1901-2001
  5. ↑ "10th International Conference on Medical Regulation - Sponsors". BUKSA Strategic Conference Services. Archived from the original on 2012-10-05. Retrieved 2022-09-27.
  6. ↑ "CMPA - By-law 52". www.cmpa-acpm.ca. Retrieved 14 December 2017.
  7. ↑ CMPA Strategic Plan 2015-2019
  8. ↑ "Good practices to advance patient safety". Canadian Patient Safety Institute. Archived from the original on 2014-02-22. Retrieved February 14, 2014.
  9. ↑ Silversides A (2008). "Patient-safety reforms inhibited by systemic impediments". CMAJ. 179 (12): 1253–5. doi:10.1503/cmaj.081790. PMC   2585115 . PMID   19047600.
  10. ↑ 'Grieving Warrior' Pushes for Patient Safety Community Press (February 2010)
  11. ↑ Amy Lynn Sorrel (May 3, 2010). "Medical liability: A world of difference". American Medical News. Archived from the original on 2010-05-05. Retrieved May 5, 2010.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. ↑ "Under Exposed: The Secret Discipline of B.C.'s Professions". Victoria Times Colonist. 25 September 2008. Retrieved 25 February 2010.[ permanent dead link ]
  13. ↑ "Doctors in Trouble: How Taxpayers' Money Rescues Physicians Facing Legal Problems". Victoria Times Colonist. 19 February 2008. Archived from the original on 2010-05-01. Retrieved 25 February 2010.
  14. ↑ Jeff Rud (16 February 2008). "Taxpayers Helped Doctor Get Name Off Offender Registry". Victoria Times Colonist. Archived from the original on 2010-05-01. Retrieved 25 February 2010.
  15. ↑ "Confidential Programs Let Addicted Doctors Practice While in Rehab". Hamilton Spectator. 18 December 2007. Retrieved 25 February 2010.
  16. ↑ "Assault: The Doctors Who Committed These Offenses Are Still Working". Hamilton Spectator. 27 October 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-10-29. Retrieved 25 February 2010.
  17. 1 2 "CMPA Annual Report 2012". Archived from the original on 2014-02-22. Retrieved 2014-02-14.
  18. ↑ Understanding Performance Difficulties in Doctors: Bibliography National Clinical Assessment Authority (UK)
  19. ↑ "Teaching Disruptive Physicians Collegiality". Archived from the original on 2010-01-03. Retrieved 2010-02-27.
  20. ↑ Dr. Charles Smith: Goudge Report Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario 2008
  21. ↑ Dr. Joel Yelland: Testimony Convicts Innocents Injusticebusters 2004
  22. ↑ Asma Razzaq (1998). "Operating in the Dark: The Accountability Crisis in Canada's Healthcare System". Healthcare Quarterly. 2 (2): 72–73. doi: 10.12927/hcq..16740 .
  23. ↑ To Err Is Human ... in Canada Too Archived 2010-03-12 at WebCite 2004 Canadian Institute of Health Information
  24. ↑ Website RateMDs.com
  25. ↑ Website DoctorRate.com
  26. ↑ Website Medhaps: Case by Case Study of Medical Mishaps
  27. ↑ "Canadian Disclosure Guidelines" (PDF). The Canadian Patient Safety Institute. 2011. Retrieved 15 December 2017.
  28. ↑ Mandatory Reporting of Suspect Colleagues Coming in Ontario [ permanent dead link ]The Medical Post (26 September 2008)
  29. ↑ Levinson W., Gallagher T. H. (2007). "Disclosing Medical Errors to Patients: Status Report". Canadian Medical Association Journal. CMAJ. 177 (3): 265–267. doi:10.1503/cmaj.061413. PMC   1930188 . PMID   17664451.
  30. ↑ Rob Cribb; Tanya Talaga (1 December 2007). "Hospital Death-Rate Report Triggers Calls for Action". Toronto Star . Retrieved 14 December 2017.
  31. ↑ Rob Cribb; Tanya Talaga (5 May 2007). "Patients Win Right to Know". Toronto Star . Archived from the original on 5 September 2008. Retrieved 26 February 2010.
  32. ↑ Rob Cribb; Tanya Talaga (20 April 2007). "Stop Shielding Doctors, Patients Demand". Toronto Star. Retrieved 14 December 2017.
  33. ↑ Ann Silversides (2008). "Fault / No-Fault (Part 1): Bearing the Brunt of Medical Mishaps". CMAJ. 179 (4): 309–311. doi:10.1503/cmaj.081020. PMC   2492972 . PMID   18695171.
  34. ↑ Ann Silversides (2008). "Fault / No-Fault (Part 2): Uneasy Bedfellows". CMAJ. 179 (5): 407–409. doi:10.1503/cmaj.081130. PMC   2518178 . PMID   18725607.
  35. ↑ Ann Silversides (2008). "Fault / No-Fault (Part 3): Vested Interests and the Silence of Suffering Patients Cited as Obstacles to System Change". CMAJ. 179 (6): 515–517. doi:10.1503/cmaj.081201. PMC   2527390 . PMID   18779522.
  36. ↑ Pelletier, Elaine; Robson, Rob (2008). "Giving Back the Pen: Disclosure, Apology and Early Compensation After Harm in the Health Care Setting". Healthcare Quarterly. 11 (3 Spec No): 85–90. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2008.19655 . PMID   18382167.
  37. ↑ "Medical liability practices in Canada: Towards the right balance". Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-22. Retrieved 2014-02-14.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.