Chancery Amendment Act 1858

Last updated

Chancery Amendment Act 1858 [1]
Act of Parliament
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Variant 1, 2022).svg
Long title An Act to amend the course of procedure in the High Court of Chancery, the Court of Chancery in Ireland, and the Court of Chancery of the county palatine of Lancaster.
Citation 21 & 22 Vict. c. 27
Introduced by Hugh Cairns
Territorial extent United Kingdom
Dates
Royal assent 28 June 1858 [2]
Commencement 1 October 1858
Other legislation
Repealed by Supreme Court Act 1981
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

The Chancery Amendment Act 1858 (21 & 22 Vict. c. 27) also known as Lord Cairns' Act after Sir Hugh Cairns, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that allowed the English Court of Chancery, the Irish Chancery and the Chancery Court of the County Palatine of Lancaster to award damages, in addition to their previous function of awarding injunctions and specific performance. The Act also made several procedural changes to the Chancery courts, most notably allowing them to call a jury, and allowed the Lord Chancellor to amend the practice regulations of the courts. By allowing the Chancery courts to award damages it narrowed the gap between the common law and equity courts and accelerated the passing of the Judicature Act 1873, and for that reason has been described by Ernest Pollock as "prophetic". [3]

Contents

After the English Court of Chancery was dissolved by the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 the Act lost relevance, and in England and Wales it was gradually repealed by a succession of acts up to the 1880s. The Supreme Court of Judicature (Ireland) Act 1877, which reorganised the Superior Courts in Ireland to create the High Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal, similarly reduced the relevance of the Act in the Republic of Ireland.

Background

During the 19th century the higher courts were divided into two main types—courts of Common Law, such as the Court of Common Pleas, and Courts of Equity such as the Court of Chancery; this reflected the two English court systems which had existed since the Middle Ages. Rules on court jurisdiction meant that common law courts could not grant orders of specific performance or injunctions, only damages, and courts of equity could only grant injunctions and orders of specific performance, not damages. [4] This meant that a winning party in a chancery case who sought to claim damages was forced to open a second claim in a common law court, [3] filling the courts with unnecessary cases and causing additional expense for the parties. The same was true of winners of common law cases who sought specific performance or injunctions. The common law courts were authorised to issue injunctions and orders of specific performance by the Common Law Procedure Act 1854, but nothing in the Act mentioned the Chancery courts. [4]

A Royal Commission "appointed to inquire into the Process, Practice and System of Pleading in the Court of Chancery" had been created in 1850 to investigate possible reforms to the Courts of Chancery, [5] and they recommended (among other things) that the chancery courts be given the power to order damages and use a jury. [6]

The Act to implement the Commission's recommendations was introduced in 1857 as "Chancery amendment. A bill to amend the course of procedure in the High Court of Chancery, the Court of Chancery in Ireland, and the Court of Chancery of the county palatine of Lancaster", [7] and after passing through several committees was introduced to the House of Commons on 14 May 1858. [7] The Act was piloted through Parliament by Sir Hugh Cairns (later Lord Cairns), the Solicitor General for England and Wales, and for this reason is commonly known as Lord Cairns' Act. [8] It was passed by Parliament and came into force on 1 November 1858. [9]

Provisions of the Act

The Act is relatively small, containing only 12 sections, including several sections on procedures. [9]

Repeal

After the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 dissolved the English Court of Chancery and unified the common and equity courts into the High Court of Justice, the 1858 Act became irrelevant since the ability to issue injunctions, order specific performance or award damages was given to all of the senior courts. [3] In the United Kingdom the act was repealed piecemeal by multiple Acts of Parliament, including the Supreme Court of Judicature (Officers) Act 1879 and the Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1881. The act was formally repealed in its entirety by the Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1883. [3]

Although the Act applied to the Irish courts, they were unaffected by any of the repealing legislation. [21] As a result, the provisions of the Act are still law in the Republic of Ireland, although they have been transferred several times. [21] The Irish Chancery was merged into the High Court of Ireland by the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877, but the same Act also transferred the rights under the 1858 Act to the new High Court. The Government of Ireland Act 1920 transferred these rights to the new Supreme Courts of Northern Ireland and Southern Ireland respectively, and the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 finally repealed the 1858 Act in Northern Ireland. [21] The Act is still valid in the Republic of Ireland, however, and the rights continue to be exercised by the High Court of Ireland. [21]

In many British Dominions local statute was passed to bring the 1858 Act into local law, and it is still valid in Ontario under the Courts of Justice Act 1984 and British Columbia under the Supreme Court Act 1986. [21]

The Act was influential as the first step towards a unified High Court, with equal abilities for both equity and common law branches. [22] Evidence suggests that the changes were easily absorbed by the Court, and there are no cases which suggest it caused problems either in cases or in Parliament. [23]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873</span> 1873 UK law reorganising the English court system

The Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in 1873. It reorganised the English court system to establish the High Court and the Court of Appeal, and also originally provided for the abolition of the judicial functions of the House of Lords with respect to England. It would have retained those functions in relation to Scotland and Ireland for the time being. However, the Gladstone Liberal government fell in 1874 before the Act entered into force, and the succeeding Disraeli Conservative government suspended the entry into force of the Act by means of the Supreme Court of Judicature (Commencement) Act 1874 and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1875.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equity (law)</span> Set of legal principles supplementing but distinct from the Common Law

In the field of jurisprudence, equity is the particular body of law, developed in the English Court of Chancery, with the general purpose of providing legal remedies for cases wherein the common law is inflexible and cannot fairly resolve the disputed legal matter. Conceptually, equity was part of the historical origins of the system of common law of England, yet is a field of law separate from common law, because equity has its own unique rules and principles, and was administered by courts of equity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English law</span> Legal system of England and Wales

English law is the common law legal system of England and Wales, comprising mainly criminal law and civil law, each branch having its own courts and procedures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of Chancery</span> Court of equity in England and Wales (c. 1350–1875)

The Court of Chancery was a court of equity in England and Wales that followed a set of loose rules to avoid a slow pace of change and possible harshness of the common law. The Chancery had jurisdiction over all matters of equity, including trusts, land law, the estates of lunatics and the guardianship of infants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876</span> United Kingdom law

The Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that altered the judicial functions of the House of Lords by allowing senior judges to sit in the House of Lords as life peers with the rank of baron, known as Lords of Appeal in Ordinary. The first person to be made a law lord under its terms was Sir Colin Blackburn on 16 October 1876, who became Baron Blackburn.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicature Acts</span> UK laws restructuring the English-Welsh court system (1873–1899)

In the history of the courts of England and Wales, the Judicature Acts were a series of Acts of Parliament, beginning in the 1870s, which aimed to fuse the hitherto split system of courts of England and Wales. The first two Acts were the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1875, with a further series of amending acts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts Act 1971</span> 1971 UK law reforming the court system of England and Wales

The Courts Act 1971 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the purpose of which was to reform and modernise the courts system of England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of equity</span> Court authorized to apply principles of equity to cases

A court of equity, also known as an equity court or chancery court, is a court authorized to apply principles of equity rather than principles of law to cases brought before it. These courts originated from petitions to the Lord Chancellor of England and primarily heard claims for relief other than damages, such as specific performance and extraordinary writs. Over time, most equity courts merged with courts of law, and the adoption of various Acts granted courts combined jurisdiction to administer common law and equity concurrently. Courts of equity are now recognized for complementing the common law by addressing its shortcomings and promoting justice.

The High Court of Ireland is a court which deals at first instance with the most serious and important civil and criminal cases. When sitting as a criminal court it is called the Central Criminal Court and sits with judge and jury. It also acts as a court of appeal for civil cases in the Circuit Court. It also has the power to determine whether or not a law is constitutional, and of judicial review over acts of the government and other public bodies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delaware Court of Chancery</span> Court of equity in Delaware, United States

The Delaware Court of Chancery is a court of equity in the U.S. state of Delaware. It is one of Delaware's three constitutional courts, along with the Supreme Court and Superior Court. Since 2018, the court consists of seven judges. The court is known for being a hub for corporate governance litigation in the United States, as two-thirds of Fortune 500 companies are incorporated in Delaware.

Equitable remedies are judicial remedies developed by courts of equity from about the time of Henry VIII to provide more flexible responses to changing social conditions than was possible in precedent-based common law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of Chancery (Ireland)</span>

The Court of Chancery was a court which exercised equitable jurisdiction in Ireland until its abolition as part of the reform of the court system in 1877. It was the court in which the Lord Chancellor of Ireland presided. Its final sitting place was at the Four Courts in Dublin, which still stands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chancery Regulation Act 1862</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Chancery Regulation Act 1862, also known as Rolt's Act was an Act of the United Kingdom Parliament that was an important step in the fusion of law and equity.

<i>Attorney General v Blake</i> English contract law case on damages for breach of contract

Attorney General v Blake[2000] UKHL 45, [2001] 1 AC 268 is a leading English contract law case on damages for breach of contract. It established that in some circumstances, where ordinary remedies are inadequate, restitutionary damages may be awarded.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court of Justice</span> One of the Senior Courts of England and Wales

The High Court of Justice in London, known properly as His Majesty's High Court of Justice in England, together with the Court of Appeal and the Crown Court, are the Senior Courts of England and Wales. Its name is abbreviated as EWHC for legal citation purposes.

<i>Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd</i>

Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798 is an English land law and English contract law case, concerning the measure and availability of damages for breach of negative covenant in circumstances where the court has confirmed that a covenant is legally enforceable and refused, as unconscionable, to issue an order for specific performance or an injunction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877</span> Act reforming the Irish court system

The Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that brought about a major reorganisation of the superior courts in Ireland. It created a Supreme Court of Judicature, comprising the High Court of Justice in Ireland and the Court of Appeal in Ireland. It mirrored in Ireland the changes which the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 had made in the courts of England and Wales.

The High Court of Justice in Ireland was the court created by the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877 to replace the existing court structure in Ireland. Its creation mirrored the reform of the courts of England and Wales five years earlier under the Judicature Acts. The Act created a Supreme Court of Judicature, consisting of a High Court of Justice and a Court of Appeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1883</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1883 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Bill for this Act was the Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Bill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civil Procedure Acts Repeal Act 1879</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Civil Procedure Acts Repeal Act 1879 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is a public general Act. The bill for this act was the Civil Procedure Acts Repeal Bill.

References

  1. This short title was conferred on this Act by section 1 of this Act.
  2. "MINUTES. (Hansard, 28 June 1858)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . 28 June 1858. Retrieved 25 July 2009.
  3. 1 2 3 4 McDermott (1987) p.1
  4. 1 2 Ramjohn (1998) p.6
  5. Clarke, Sir Anthony (2008). "The Woolf Reforms: A singular event or an ongoing process?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2008. Retrieved 25 July 2009.
  6. 1 2 Lobban, Michael (2004). "Preparing for Fusion: Reforming the Nineteenth-Century Court of Chancery, Part II". Law and History Review. 22 (3). ISSN   0738-2480.
  7. 1 2 "HCCP - Full Papers". House of Commons Parliamentary Papers. Retrieved 25 July 2009.
  8. Millett, Peter (2005). "Lives of the Judges: Jessel, Cairns, Bowen and Bramwell". Law Quarterly Review (121). ISSN   0023-933X.
  9. 1 2 Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.1
  10. Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.2
  11. Sharma (2003) p.226
  12. 1 2 Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.3
  13. Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.4
  14. Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.5
  15. Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.6
  16. Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.7
  17. Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.8
  18. Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.9
  19. Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.11
  20. Chancery Amendment Act 1858 S.12
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 McDermott (1987) p.6
  22. Jolowicz (1975) p.224
  23. Jolowicz (1975) p.226

Bibliography

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources