Christian views on lying

Last updated
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor, Lucas Cranach the elder 8 Gebot (Lucas Cranach d A).jpg
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor, Lucas Cranach the elder

Lying is strongly discouraged and forbidden by most interpretations of Christianity. Arguments for this are based on various biblical passages, especially "thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour", one of the Ten Commandments. Christian theologians disagree as to the exact definition of "lie" and whether it is ever acceptable.

Contents

Biblical passages

One of the Ten Commandments is "thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour"; for this reason, lying is generally considered a sin in Christianity. [1] The story of Naboth in 1 Kings 21 provides an example where false witness leads to an unjust outcome. [2] The exact interpretation of the commandment is disputed: [3] [4] "Does the commandment pertain only to court or does it prohibit lying in general? Is it only a prohibition (not to lie in court, not ever to lie) or does it imply a positive injunction (truth-telling in court, truth-telling in general)? If positive, is one enjoined only to truth-telling or to veracity and honesty also?" [3] Other statements in the Bible express a negative view of lying, such as "You shall not steal, nor deal falsely, nor lie to one another" (Leviticus 19:11) and "Cursed is he who does the work of the Lord deceitfully" (Jeremiah 48:10). [5]

In the Hebrew Bible, those who practice lying and deceit are seemingly rewarded for their actions, posing problems for an exegesis that upholds a categorical prohibition. [6] Examples include the Hebrew midwives who lie after Pharaoh commands them to kill all newborn boys (Exodus 1:17–21), and Rahab (Joshua 2:1–7; cf. Hebrews 11:31), an innkeeper who lies to soldiers while hiding spies in her inn. The midwives appear to be rewarded for their actions (God "dealt well with the midwives” and "gave them families"). James 2:25 appears to praise Rahab as an example of good works: "And in the same way was not also Rahab the prostitute justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way?" [7] [8] In the Book of Judith, Judith deceives Holofernes in order to assassinate him. [9] Both Abraham and Isaac claimed that their wives were their sisters. [10]

Early Christian views

Among early Christian writers, there existed differing viewpoints regarding the ethics of deception and dishonesty in certain circumstances. Some argued that lying and dissimulation could be justified for reasons such as saving souls, convincing reluctant candidates to accept ordination, or demonstrating humility by refraining from boasting about one's virtues. Supporters of this position often referred to Paul's statement about becoming all things to all men in order to win them over as a basis for their arguments. [11] [12] [13]

Patristic views

Augustine devoted much attention to lying, which he contended was always wrong. He discussed the topic in four works ( De magistro , De doctrina christiana , De trinitate , and Enchiridion ) and wrote two treatises, De mendacio and Contra mendacium , specifically on the subject of lies. [1] According to Augustine, only four types of falsehood were not lies, because there was no desire to deceive: explanation of someone else's viewpoint, repetition of memorized words, a slip of the tongue, or misspeaking. [14] Augustine distinguished different situations of lying by blameworthiness, but argued that every lie was a sin. [15] The consensus among scholars is that Augustine did not accept any lies as necessary or justified, even to save an innocent life. [16]

However, there was an equally strong patristic tradition that defended lying for a worthwhile cause and considered it necessary or even righteous in some cases. Exponents of this view include Pseudo-Maximus, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Hilary of Poitiers, John Cassian, John Chrysostom, Dorotheus of Gaza, Palladius of Antioch, John Climacus, and Paulinus of Nola. [17] This second patristic tradition was summarized by Ambrose of Milan, whose argument, based on scripture, held that Judith's action was meritorious because "she undertook for religion, not love... she served religion... and the fatherland". [1]

Later views

Notable Christian theologians who argued that lying was never permissible for Christians include Thomas Aquinas and John Calvin. [18] [19] Both Augustine and Aquinas held that it was always possible to take a correct and blameless action in any circumstance. Some Waldensians weren't strongly opposed to lying if necessary for survival. [20] Defenders of lying in some cases, such as Cassian and H. Tristram Engelhardt, tended to hold the opposite view: that sometimes true moral dilemmas arise. [21] James VI and I once characterized England as a "most lying nation" due to what he perceived as slander directed at him from the citizenry. [22] [23]

Martin Luther argued that it is permissible to go as far as swearing an Oath in a lie in his commentary on Matthew. [24] where taking an oath of any sort, even if followed through is deemed impermissible, possibly using Paul's oath (1 Cor. 9:20), or unhonored oaths from the Crusades for his reasoning. [25]

So that some have stretched their conscience so tightly, that one doubts whether one ought to take a solemn oath not to avenge himself when he is set free from prison, or whether we are by an oath to make peace and a treaty with the Turks... As, if it should come to pass, that we would make a treaty and concord with our enemies or the Turks.

Martin Luther, Commentary on the Sermon on the Mount, [26]

In the twentieth century, Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Reinhold Niebuhr also took a non-absolutist position. [18] In Ethics , Bonhoeffer discusses Kantian ethics and contests the Kantian view of lying, because "Treating truthfulness as a principle leads Kant to the grotesque conclusion that if asked by a murderer whether my friend, whom he was pursuing, had sought refuge in my house, I would have to answer honestly in the affirmative." [27] Although he maintained that one should lie to save his friend in that situation, Bonhoeffer argued that either option incurred guilt. [27] In a later essay, “What Does It Mean to Tell the Truth?”, Bonhoeffer argued that "Lying … is and ought to be understood as something plainly condemnable" and that it did not always incur guilt. [27]

Professor Allen Verhey argued that lying is not always wrong, because "We live the truth not for its own sake, but for God's sake and for the neighbor's sake." [19] The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that lying is always wrong. [28] Different definitions of lying exist, such that Christians do not agree that all deception counts as "lying". Catholic writer and new natural law philosopher Christopher Tollefsen has also argued that lying is never permissible for Christians. [18] [29] In a review of Tollefsen's book, John Skalko stated that this is an unpopular and widely criticized view. [28]

Public opinion

According to a 2016 Pew Research Center survey, 67% of Christians in the United States, including 81% of those who defined themselves as "highly religious", agreed that "Being honest at all times" was "essential" to their Christian identity. [30] According to the 2014 Pew Religious Landscape study in the US, the Christian group that had the highest rate of telling white lies were Black Protestants. [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

Pelagianism is a Christian theological position that holds that the original sin did not taint human nature and that humans by divine grace have free will to achieve human perfection. Pelagius, an ascetic and philosopher from the British Isles, taught that God could not command believers to do the impossible, and therefore it must be possible to satisfy all divine commandments. He also taught that it was unjust to punish one person for the sins of another; therefore, infants are born blameless. Pelagius accepted no excuse for sinful behaviour and taught that all Christians, regardless of their station in life, should live unimpeachable, sinless lives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amalek</span> Nation and a character described in the Hebrew Bible

Amalek was a nation described in the Hebrew Bible as a staunch enemy of the Israelites. The name "Amalek" can refer to the nation's founder, a grandson of Esau; his descendants, the Amalekites; or the territories of Amalek, which they inhabited.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dietrich Bonhoeffer</span> German theologian and dissident anti-Nazi (1906–1945)

Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German Lutheran pastor, theologian and anti-Nazi dissident who was a key founding member of the Confessing Church. His writings on Christianity's role in the secular world have become widely influential; his 1937 book The Cost of Discipleship is described as a modern classic. Apart from his theological writings, Bonhoeffer was known for his staunch resistance to the Nazi dictatorship, including vocal opposition to Adolf Hitler's euthanasia program and genocidal persecution of the Jews. He was arrested in April 1943 by the Gestapo and imprisoned at Tegel Prison for one-and-a-half years. Later, he was transferred to Flossenbürg concentration camp.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legalism (theology)</span> Pejorative for performative Christianity

In Christian theology, legalism is a pejorative term applied to the idea that "by doing good works or by obeying the law, a person earns and merits salvation."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lie</span> Intentionally false statement made to deceive

A lie is an assertion that is believed to be false, typically used with the purpose of deceiving or misleading someone. The practice of communicating lies is called lying. A person who communicates a lie may be termed a liar. Lies can be interpreted as deliberately false statements or misleading statements. Lies may also serve a variety of instrumental, interpersonal, or psychological functions for the individuals who use them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divine command theory</span> Meta-ethical theory of morality

Divine command theory is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monotheistic and polytheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

Christian existentialism is a theo-philosophical movement which takes an existentialist approach to Christian theology. The school of thought is often traced back to the work of the Danish philosopher and theologian Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) who is widely regarded as the father of existentialism.

"The law of Christ" is a New Testament phrase. The related Bible verses are in the Pauline epistles at Galatians 6:2 and parenthetically at 1 Corinthians 9:21.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ten Commandments</span> Biblical principles relating to ethics and worship

The Ten Commandments, or the Decalogue, are a set of biblical principles relating to ethics and worship that play a fundamental role in Judaism and Christianity. The text of the Ten Commandments appears twice in the Hebrew Bible: at Exodus 20:2–17 and Deuteronomy 5:6–21.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christian ethics</span> Branch of theology that defines virtuous and sinful behavior from a Christian perspective

Christian ethics, also known as moral theology, is a multi-faceted ethical system. It is a virtue ethic, which focuses on building moral character, and a deontological ethic which emphasizes duty. It also incorporates natural law ethics, which is built on the belief that it is the very nature of humans – created in the image of God and capable of morality, cooperation, rationality, discernment and so on – that informs how life should be lived, and that awareness of sin does not require special revelation. Other aspects of Christian ethics, represented by movements such as the social Gospel and liberation theology, may be combined into a fourth area sometimes called prophetic ethics.

Christian realism is a political theology in the Christian tradition. It is built on three biblical presumptions: the sinfulness of humanity, the freedom of humanity, and the validity and seriousness of the Great Commandment. The key political concepts of Christian realism are balance of power and political responsibility. This political-theological perspective is most closely associated with the work of the 20th-century American theologian and public intellectual Reinhold Niebuhr. Niebuhr argued that the Kingdom of God cannot be realized on earth because of the innately corrupt tendencies of society. Due to the injustices that arise among people, we must be willing to compromise the ideal of Kingdom of Heaven on earth. Niebuhr argued that human perfectibility was an illusion, highlighting the sinfulness of humanity at a time when the world was confronted by labor disputes and race riots in industrial hubs like Detroit, Michigan where he pastored, the horrors of the Second World War, the Communist and Fascist totalitarian regimes, and the Holocaust. Christian realism was in part a reaction to the 20th-century Social Gospel movement. Numerous American political figures have been influenced by Christian realism, among them Barack Obama, Martin Luther King Jr., and Jimmy Carter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Devil in Christianity</span> Concept of the personification of evil in Christianity

In Christianity, the Devil is the personification of evil who rebelled against God in an attempt to become equal to God himself. He is depicted as a fallen angel, who was expelled from Heaven at the beginning of time, before God created the material world, and is in constant opposition to God. The devil is identified with several figures in the Bible including the serpent in the Garden of Eden, Lucifer, Satan, the tempter of the Gospels, Leviathan, and the dragon in the Book of Revelation.

The Cost of Discipleship is a book by the German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, considered to be a classic of Christian thought. The original German title is simply Nachfolge. It is centered on an exposition of the Sermon on the Mount, in which Bonhoeffer spells out what he believes it means to follow Christ. The book was first published in 1937, when the rise of the Nazi regime was underway in Germany. It was against this background that Bonhoeffer's theology of costly discipleship developed, which ultimately led to his death.

Nancy J. Duff is an American professor of theology. Duff worked as the Stephen Colwell Associate Professor of Christian Ethics at Princeton Theological Seminary, where she taught from 1990 until 2020. Duff is also a Presbyterian minister in the PCUSA denomination. She is married to United Methodist Minister David Mertz. She has taught courses on the Decalogue, Biomedical ethics, human sexuality, liturgy and the Christian life, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, James Cone, types of Christian ethics, and vocation in Christian tradition and contemporary life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour</span> One of the Ten Commandments

"Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour" is one of the Ten Commandments, widely understood as moral imperatives by Jewish, Catholic, and Protestant scholars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jesus and the rich young man</span> Episode in the New Testament

Jesus and the rich young man is an episode in the life of Jesus recounted in the Gospel of Matthew 19:16–30, the Gospel of Mark 10:17–31 and the Gospel of Luke 18:18–30 in the New Testament. It deals with eternal life and the world to come.

While most Christian theology reflects the view that at least some Mosaic Laws have been set aside under the New Covenant, there are some theology systems that view the entire Mosaic or Old Covenant as abrogated in that all of the Mosaic Laws are set aside for the Law of Christ.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James 2</span> Chapter of the New Testament

James 2 is the second chapter of the Epistle of James in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. The author identifies himself as "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ" and the epistle is traditionally attributed to James the brother of Jesus, written in Jerusalem between 48 and 61 CE. Alternatively, some scholars argue that it is a pseudographical work written after 61 CE. This chapter contains an exposition about the commandment, "You shall love your neighbour as yourself", and about dead faith.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joshua 2</span> Book of Joshua, chapter 2

Joshua 2 is the second chapter of the Book of Joshua in the Hebrew Bible or in the Old Testament of the Christian Bible. According to Jewish tradition, the book was attributed to the Joshua, with additions by the high priests Eleazar and Phinehas, but modern scholars view it as part of the Deuteronomistic History, which spans the books of Deuteronomy to 2 Kings, attributed to nationalistic and devotedly Yahwistic writers during the time of the reformer Judean king Josiah in 7th century BCE. This chapter focuses on the spies sent by Joshua to Jericho and their encounter with Rahab, a part of a section comprising Joshua 1:1–5:12 about the entry to the land of Canaan.

In Jewish tradition, lying is generally forbidden but is required in certain exceptional cases, such as to save a life.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Colish 2005, p. 155.
  2. Swezey 1980, p. 406.
  3. 1 2 Swezey 1980, p. 408.
  4. du Preez 1998, p. 202.
  5. du Preez 1998, pp. 197, 201.
  6. Blacketer 2008, p. 267.
  7. Storms, Sam (25 January 2018). "Perplexing Passages: Do Exodus 1 and Joshua 2 Permit Christians to Lie?". The Gospel Coalition. Archived from the original on 19 August 2020. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
  8. du Preez 1998, pp. 187–188.
  9. Colish 2005, pp. 162–163.
  10. Weiss 2017, p. 1.
  11. Ramsey, Boniface (1985). "Two Traditions on Lying and Deception in the Ancient Church". The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review. 49 (4): 504–533. doi:10.1353/tho.1985.0001. ISSN   2473-3725. S2CID   171489661.
  12. "Bible Gateway passage: 1 Corinthians 9:20-23 - New International Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  13. Colish 2005.
  14. Colish 2005, p. 156.
  15. Colish 2005, p. 157.
  16. Puffer 2016, p. 685.
  17. Colish 2005, p. 162.
  18. 1 2 3 Tollefsen 2014, p. ix.
  19. 1 2 Verhey, Allen (1999). "Is Lying Always Wrong?". Christianity Today . Archived from the original on 17 February 2018. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
  20. Smelyansky, E. (2020). Heresy and Citizenship: Persecution of Heresy in Late Medieval German Cities. Studies in Medieval History and Culture. Taylor & Francis. p. 51. ISBN   978-1-000-19311-4 . Retrieved 2023-05-10.
  21. Tollefsen 2014, p. 61.
  22. MacLean, G. (2010). Britain and the Muslim World: Historical Perspectives. EBSCO ebook academic collection. Cambridge Scholars. p. 51. ISBN   978-1-4438-2592-4 . Retrieved 2023-04-27.
  23. Saxham Little, Eng. (Parish); Hervey, S.H.A. (1901). Little Saxham Parish Registers: Baptisms, Marriages, and Burials, with Appendices, Biographies, &c. 1559 to 1850. Little Saxham Parish Registers: Baptisms, Marriages, and Burials, with Appendices, Biographies, &c. 1559 to 1850. G. Booth. p. 169. Retrieved 2023-04-27.
  24. "Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 5:33-37 - New International Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  25. "Bible Gateway passage: 1 Corinthians 9:20-23 - New International Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  26. "MARTIN LUTHER - COMMENTARY ON THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT". godrules.net. Retrieved 2023-07-18.
  27. 1 2 3 Puffer 2019, Lying and Guilt Actively Embraced in "History and Good".
  28. 1 2 Skalko 2016, p. 1045.
  29. Spoerl 2015, p. 1.
  30. "Essentials of Christian identity vary by level of religiosity". Religion & Public Life Project. Pew Research Center. 12 April 2016. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
  31. "More than four-in-ten say they told white lie, lost temper in past week". Pew Research Center . Archived from the original on 2022-01-16.

Sources

Further reading