Cohesion Fund

Last updated

The Cohesion Fund (CF), one of the five European Structural and Investment Funds of the European Union, provides support to Member States with a gross national income (GNI) per capita below 90% EU-27 average to strengthen the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the EU. Common regulatory provisions apply to the five ESIF funds, along with the Just Transition Fund, the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy. [1] : Article 1 

Contents

The fund's purpose includes support for investments in the environmental field and on Trans-European Networks in the area of transport infrastructure (TEN-T). [1] : Preamble 22 

History

The European Council meetings held in Lisbon, 26-27 June 1992, and Edinburgh, 11-12 December 1992, agreed the establishment of the Cohesion Fund. [2] This was formalized in 1993, as part of the Delros II package of the Treaty of Maastricht, with the goal of reinforcing the regional policy of the EU. [3] Since then, its goal has been the economic convergence among European regions, by means of public investment in transportation infrastructure and environmental projects. [4] It was a way to compensate, to a certain extent, the strict policies on public debt that were agreed by the European members: these funds allowed to maintain both a controlled deficit and public investment in strategic areas. [5]

Cohesion Funds cover seven-year funding periods:

Originally, the traditional recipients of these funds were Greece, Portugal, Spain and Ireland, among others; but since new countries joined the EU in 2004, 2007 and 2014, the funds have been located mainly in Central and Eastern Europe. [6] For the 2021–2027 period, the Cohesion Fund is available to Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. 37% of the overall financial allocation of the Cohesion Fund is expected to contribute to climate objectives. [7] Member states with above-average economic output per person, including the United Kingdom before Brexit, are unable to access Cohesion Fund resources. [8]

Effectiveness

The scientific literature on the topic is ambiguous, certain research projects show a positive impact of the funds on the economy of the recipient countries, while others have ambiguous results; more rarely, they find a negative effect. [9] Some studies point out that the impact depends on the area of investment: funds dedicated to transportation infrastructure and to the energy sector have the biggest positive effect, while allocation to environmental goals are negative in the short-term, but become positive in the medium and long-run . [9]

A weakness often associated to the allocation of the CF between countries is that it is solely determined using the GNI per capita. Experts have shown that, based on that criterium, some countries that are in a worst socioeconomic situation than some of the actual recipients are not getting funds. This is problematic from the point of view of the EU, since the evidence shows a relation between Euroscepticism and middle-income regions which do not receive enough funds. [10] To better evaluate the socioeconomic situation of the recipient countries, an index that includes more socioeconomic variables has been proposed. [11]

Another concern of the EU institutions and, more specifically, of the European Commission, is the lack of visibility of these funds. [12] The literature on the topic reveals that the citizens' awareness about the CF is not linked to the amount of funds invested in their regions. [13] In this regard, the more vulnerable groups of EU citizens such as the unemployed, the recipients of welfare, and those who live in economic destitution, have the most sceptic view of the European institutions as providers of social security. [14] To address this, the European Commission is stressing the importance of improving the communication with the citizenship and between the differente stakeholders (NGO's, EU institutions and national managing institutions). [14]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Region (Europe)</span>

The European Union created a Committee of the Regions to represent Regions of Europe as the layer of EU government administration directly below the nation-state level. The committee has its headquarters in Brussels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Investment Bank</span> Investment bank of the European Union

The European Investment Bank (EIB) is the European Union's investment bank and is owned by the 27 member states. It is the largest multilateral financial institution in the world. The EIB finances and invests both through equity and debt solutions companies and projects that achieve the policy aims of the European Union through loans, equity and guarantees.

The Trans-European Networks (TEN) were created by the European Union by Articles 154–156 of the Treaty of Rome (1957), with the stated goals of the creation of an internal market and the reinforcement of economic and social cohesion. To various supporters of this policy, it made little sense to talk of a big EU market, with freedom of movement within it for goods, persons and services, unless the various regions and national networks making up that market were properly linked by modern and efficient infrastructure. The construction of Trans-European Networks was also seen as an important element for economic growth and the creation of employment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Europe</span>

The economy of Europe comprises about 748 million people in 50 countries. The formation of the European Union (EU) and in 1999 the introduction of a unified currency, the Euro, brought participating European countries closer through the convenience of a shared currency. The European Union is a unique global organisation, an entity forming one of the largest economies in the world. The European Union also “regulates” the global market by the single market. The difference in wealth across Europe can be seen roughly in the former Cold War divide, with some countries breaching the divide. Whilst most European states have a GDP per capita higher than the world's average and are very highly developed, some European economies, despite their position over the world's average in the Human Development Index, are relatively poor. Europe has total banking assets of more than $50 trillion and its Global assets under management has more than $20 trillion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regional policy of the European Union</span> Regional policy of the EU

The regional policy of the European Union (EU), also referred as Cohesion Policy, is a policy with the stated aim of improving the economic well-being of regions in the European Union and also to avoid regional disparities. More than one third of the EU's budget is devoted to this policy, which aims to remove economic, social and territorial disparities across the EU, restructure declining industrial areas and diversify rural areas which have declining agriculture. In doing so, EU regional policy is geared towards making regions more competitive, fostering economic growth and creating new jobs. The policy also has a role to play in wider challenges for the future, including climate change, energy supply and globalisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Structural and Investment Funds</span> European Union financial tools

The European Structural and Investment Funds are financial tools governed by a common rulebook, set up to implement the regional policy of the European Union, as well as the structural policy pillars of the Common Agricultural Policy and the Common Fisheries Policy. They aim to reduce regional disparities in income, wealth and opportunities. Europe's poorer regions receive most of the support, but all European regions are eligible for funding under the policy's various funds and programmes. The current framework is set for a period of seven years, from 2021 to 2027.

The Committee on Regional Development (REGI) is a committee of the European Parliament. Its current chair, elected on 10 July 2019, is Younous Omarjee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Budget of the European Union</span> Monetary budget of the EU

The budget of the European Union is used to finance EU funding programmes and other expenditure at the European level.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Regional Development Fund</span> Funds allocated by the European Union

The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) is one of the European Structural and Investment Funds allocated by the European Union. Its purpose is to transfer money from richer regions, and invest it in the infrastructure and services of underdeveloped regions. This will allow those regions to start attracting private sector investments, and create jobs on their own.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Social Fund Plus</span>

The European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) is one of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs), which are dedicated to improving social cohesion and economic well-being across the regions of the Union. The funds are redistributive financial instruments that support cohesion within Europe by concentrating spending on the less-developed regions.

Interreg is a series of programmes to stimulate cooperation between regions in and out of the European Union (EU), funded by the European Regional Development Fund. The first Interreg started in 1989. Interreg IV covered the period 2007–2013. Interreg V (2014–2020) covers all 27 EU member states, the EFTA countries, six accession countries and 18 neighbouring countries. It has a budget of EUR 10.1 billion, which represents 2.8% of the total of the European Cohesion Policy budget. Since the non EU countries don't pay EU membership fee, they contribute directly to Interreg, not through ERDF.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy</span>

The Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy is a Directorate-General of the European Commission.

The EEA Grants and Norway Grants represent the contributions of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway to reducing social and economic disparities in the European Economic Area (EEA) and strengthening bilateral relations with 15 EU countries in Central and Southern Europe. Through the Grants, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway are also contributing to strengthening fundamental European values such as democracy, tolerance and the rule of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lúcio Mauro Vinhas de Souza</span> Brazilian-Portuguese economist

Lúcio Vinhas de Souza is a Brazilian-Portuguese economist. His main research areas are global macroeconomics, development economics, monetary economics, finance and country risk, with extensive work experience at the developed economies of the European Union and the US, and in several emerging market regions, from the former Soviet Union to East Asia, Africa and Latin America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cross-border cooperation</span>

Cross-border cooperation is the collaboration between adjacent areas across borders. In the European Union this is one of the forms of territorial cooperation. The European model is very diverse with cooperation between border regions or municipalities, or through specific cooperation structures. These structures are usually composed by public authorities from different countries organized in working communities, euroregions or EGTCs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrey Novakov</span> Bulgarian politician

Andrey Grishev Novakov, Bulgarian: Андрей Гришев Новаков is a Bulgarian politician who is currently serving as a Member of the European Parliament. A member of the GERB party, which is affiliated with the European People’s Party on a European level, he was previously a leader of a youth wing of his party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Structural and Investment Funds in Bulgaria</span> European financier program for Bulgaria

Since its accession in the European Union in 2007, Bulgaria has been part of the EU's Cohesion Policy. This program introduces financial instruments, also known as the European Structural and Investment Funds, which aim to reduce the gap between different regions of the EU and improve their economic wellbeing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pedro Marques (politician)</span> Portuguese politician

Pedro Manuel Dias de Jesus Marques is a Portuguese politician of the Socialist Party (PS) who has been serving as Member of the European Parliament since 2019. He is currently the vice-president for the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament. He previously served as Secretary of State for Social Security, between 2005 and 2011, and as Minister of Planning and Infrastructure in the government of Prime Minister António Costa, between 2015 and 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Next Generation EU</span> COVID-19 support funding

Next Generation EU (NGEU) is a European Commission economic recovery package to support the EU member states to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular those that have been particularly hard hit. It is sometimes styled NextGenerationEU and Next Gen EU, and also called the European Union Recovery Instrument. Agreed in principle by the European Council on 21 July 2020 and adopted on 14 December 2020, the instrument is worth €750 billion. NGEU will operate from 2021 to 2026, and will be tied to the regular 2021–2027 budget of the EU's Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). The comprehensive NGEU and MFF packages are projected to reach €1824.3 billion.

The Just Transition Mechanism is a policy framework developed by the European Union (EU) as part of the European Green Deal investment plan to ensure a just transition into a low-carbon economy.

References

  1. 1 2 EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy, accessed 10 November 2023
  2. 1 2 EUR-Lex, Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 of 16 May 1994 establishing a Cohesion Fund, accessed 9 November 2023
  3. ↑ Holgado Molina, María del Mar; Salinas Fernández, José Antonio; Rodríguez Martín, José Antonio (2015). "A synthetic indicator to measure the economic and social cohesion of the regions of Spain and Portugal" (PDF). Revista de economía mundial. 39: 223–240.
  4. ↑ Medeiros, Eduardo; Zêzere, José Luís; Costa, Nuno (2016). "The EU Cohesion Fund and Spatial Planning Strategies in Transport and Risk Prevention: Portugal (1995-2013)" (PDF). European Structural and Investment Funds Journal. 4 (2): 87–99.
  5. ↑ Dicharry, Benoit; Nguyen-Van, Phu; Pham, Thi Kim Cuong (2019). ""The winner takes it all" or a story of the optimal allocation of the European Cohesion Fund". European Journal of Political Economy. 59: 385–399.
  6. ↑ Moreno, Rosina (2020). "EU Cohesion Policy Performance: Regional Variation in the Efectiveness of the management of the Structural Funds". Journal of Regional Research. 46: 27–50.
  7. ↑ "Cohesion Fund (CF)". European Commission . Retrieved 22 March 2022. Creative Commons by small.svg  This article incorporates text available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
  8. ↑ Nice, A, European structural funds: the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, Institute for Government, published 4 September 2018, accessed 10 November 2023
  9. 1 2 Scotti, Francesco; Flori, Andrea; Pammolli, Fabio (2022). "The economic impact of structural and Cohesion Funds across sectors: inmediate, medium-to-long term effects and spillovers". Economic Modelling. 111.
  10. ↑ Schraff, Dominik (2019). "Regional redistribution and Eurosceptic voting". Journal of European Public Policy. 26 (1): 83–105.
  11. ↑ Rodríguez Martín, José Antonio; Martín Martín, José Antonio; Salinas Fernández, José Antonio; Zermeño Mejía, Karla Aída; Añaños Bedriñana, Karen G. (2019). "A Spatial Analysis of the Achievements, in Terms of Regional Development, Accomplished by the Initial EU-Member Cohesion Fund Beneficiaries Using a Synthetic Indicator". Sustainability. 11 (8).
  12. ↑ Madama, Ilaria (2018). "Enhancing the Visibility of Social Europe: A Practical Agenda for 'the Last Mile'". Debating European Citizenship. IMISCOE Research Series: 261–266.
  13. ↑ López-Bazo, Enrique (2021). "The Impact of Cohesion Policy on Regional Differences in Support for the European Union". Journal of Common Market Studies. 60 (5): 1219–1236.
  14. 1 2 Natili, Marcello; Ronchi, Stefano; Visconti, Francesco (2023). "Invisible social Europe? Linking citizens' awareness of European cohesion funds, individual power resources, and support for the EU". Journal of European Social Policy. 0 (0): 1–13.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.