Contact inhibition

Last updated

In cell biology, contact inhibition refers to two different but closely related phenomena: contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) and contact inhibition of proliferation (CIP). CIL refers to the avoidance behavior exhibited by fibroblast-like cells when in contact with one another. [1] In most cases, when two cells contact each other, they attempt to alter their locomotion in a different direction to avoid future collision. When collision is unavoidable, a different phenomenon occurs whereby growth of the cells of the culture itself eventually stops in a cell-density dependent manner. [2]

Contents

Both types of contact inhibition are well-known properties of normal cells and contribute to the regulation of proper tissue growth, differentiation, and development. Both types of regulation are normally negated and overcome during organogenesis during embryonic development and tissue and wound healing. However, contact inhibition of locomotion and proliferation are both aberrantly absent in cancer cells, and the absence of this regulation contributes to tumorigenesis. [3]

Mechanism

Contact inhibition is a regulatory mechanism that functions to keep cells growing into a layer one cell thick (a monolayer). If a cell has plenty of available substrate space, it replicates rapidly and moves freely. This process continues until the cells occupy the entire substratum. At this point, normal cells will stop replicating.

As motile cells come into contact in confluent cultures, they exhibit decreased mobility and mitotic activity over time. [4] Exponential growth has been shown to occur between colonies in contact for numerous days, with the inhibition of mitotic activity occurring far later. This delay between cell-cell contact and onset of proliferation inhibition is shortened as the culture becomes more confluent. Thus, it may be reasonably concluded that cell-cell contact is an essential condition for contact inhibition of proliferation, but is by itself insufficient for mitotic inhibition. In addition to making contact with other cells, the contact-inhibited cells must also be forced to reduce its cell area under the mechanical stress and constraints imposed by surrounding cells. [5] Indeed, it has been suggested that mechanical tension acts as an inhibitory signal for mitosis. [6] Moreover, it is important to note that such an inhibition of mitotic activity is a local phenomenon; it occurs between a select few cells in a likely heterogeneous culture.

Role in cancer

Untransformed human cells exhibit normal cellular behavior and mediate their growth and proliferation via interplay between environmental nutrients, growth factor signaling, and cell density. As cell density increases and the culture becomes confluent, they initiate cell cycle arrest and downregulate proliferation and mitogen signaling pathways regardless of external factors or cellular metabolism. [7] This property is known as contact inhibition of proliferation and is essential to proper embryonic development, as well as tissue repair, differentiation, and morphogenesis. Cancerous cells typically lose this property and thus divide and grow over each other in an uncontrolled manner even when in contact with neighbouring cells. This results in the invasion of surrounding tissues, their metastasis to nearby organs, and eventually tumorigenesis. Cells of naked mole rats, a species in which cancer has never observed, show hypersensitivity to contact inhibition. [8] This finding may provide a clue to cancer resistance. Furthermore, recent studies have further revealed some mechanisms of contact inhibition of proliferation and its potential implications in cancer therapy.

Furthermore, it has been shown that cell-cell adhesion formation not only restricts growth and proliferation by imposing physical constraints such as cell area, but also by triggering signaling pathways that downregulate proliferation. One such pathway is the Hippo-YAP signaling pathway, which is largely responsible for inhibiting cell growth in mammals. This pathway consists primarily of a phosphorylation cascade involving serine kinases and is mediated by regulatory proteins, which regulate cell growth by binding to growth-controlling genes. [9] The serine/threonine kinase Hippo (Mst1/Mst2 encoded by the STK4 and STK3 genes respectively in mammals) activates a secondary kinase (Lats1/Lats2), which phosphorylates YAP, a transcriptional activator of growth genes. The phosphorylation of YAP serves to export it from the nucleus and prevent it from activating growth-promoting genes; this is how the Hippo-YAP pathway inhibits cell growth. [10] More importantly, the Hippo-YAP pathway uses upstream elements to act in response to cell-cell contact and controls density-dependent inhibition of proliferation. For example, cadherins are transmembrane proteins that form cellular junctions via homophilic binding [11] and thus act as detectors for cell-cell contact. Cadherin-mediated activation of the inhibitory pathway involves the transmembrane E-cadherin forming a homophilic bond in order to activate α- and β-catenin, which then stimulate downstream components of the Hippo-YAP pathway to ultimately downregulate cell growth. [12] This is consistent with the finding that E-cadherin overexpression hinders metastasis and tumorigenesis. [13] Because YAP is shown to be associated with mitogenic growth factor signaling and thus cell proliferation, it is likely that future studies will focus on the Hippo-YAP pathway's role in cancer cells.

However, it is important to note that contact-inhibited cells undergo cell cycle arrest, but do not senesce. In fact, it has been shown that contact-inhibited cells resume normal proliferation and mitogen signaling upon being replated in a less confluent culture. Thus, contact inhibition of proliferation may be viewed as a reversible form of cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, to transition from cell cycle arrest to senescence, contact-inhibited cells must activate growth-activating pathways such as mTOR. [14] Once cells in high-density cultures become confluent enough such that the cell area falls below a critical value, [15] the adhesion formations trigger pathways that downregulate mitogen signaling and cell proliferation. [16] The growth-promoting mTOR pathway is therefore inhibited, and consequently the contact-inhibited cells cannot transition from cell cycle arrest to senescence. This has crucial implications in cancer therapy; even though cancer cells are not contact-inhibited, confluent cancer cell cultures still suppress their senescence machinery. Therefore, this may be a plausible explanation why senescence-inducing cancer therapy drugs are ineffective. [17]

Cell motility

In most cases, when two cells collide they attempt to move in a different direction to avoid future collisions; this behavior is known as contact inhibition of locomotion. [18] As the two cells come into contact, their locomotive process is paralyzed. This is accomplished via a multistep, multi-faceted mechanism that involves the formation of a cell-cell adhesion complex upon collision. The disassembly of this complex is thought to be driven largely by tension in the cells and ultimately results in the colliding cells' changing directions.

First, motile cells collide and touch via their respective lamellae, whose actin exhibit high retrograde flow. A cellular adhesion forms between the lamellae, reducing the actins' retrograde flow rate in the area immediately surrounding the adhesion. Consequently, the cells' velocity and motility are reduced. This then allows actin stress fibers and microtubules to form and align with each other in both colliding partners. The alignment of these stress fibers locally accumulates elastic tension in the lamellae. Eventually, the tension buildup becomes too great, and the cell adhesion complex dissociates, collapses the lamellae protrusions, and releases the cells in different directions in an effort to alleviate the elastic tension. A possible alternate event that also leads to the assembly dissociation is that upon stress fiber alignment, the cells' leading edges repolarize away from the contiguous lamellae. This produces significant elastic tension across the entire cell bodies, not only at the local site of contact, and likewise causes the adhesion complex's disassembly. [19] Elastic tension has been thought to be the primary driving force of the protrusion collapse, complex disassembly, and the cells' dispersion. [20] Though this hypothetical tension has been characterized and visualized, [21] how tension builds in lamellae and how cell repolarization contributes to tension buildup remain open to investigation.

Furthermore, as replication increases the amount of cells, the number of directions those cells can move without touching another is decreased. [22] Cells will also attempt to move away from another cell because they stick better to the area around them, a structure called the substratum, than on other cells. When the two cells colliding are different types of cells, one or both may respond to the collision. [23]

Some immortalised cell lines, despite being able to proliferate indefinitely, still experience contact inhibition, though generally to a lesser extent than normal cell lines. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

Morphogenesis is the biological process that causes a cell, tissue or organism to develop its shape. It is one of three fundamental aspects of developmental biology along with the control of tissue growth and patterning of cellular differentiation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paracrine signaling</span> Form of localized cell signaling

In cellular biology, paracrine signaling is a form of cell signaling, a type of cellular communication in which a cell produces a signal to induce changes in nearby cells, altering the behaviour of those cells. Signaling molecules known as paracrine factors diffuse over a relatively short distance, as opposed to cell signaling by endocrine factors, hormones which travel considerably longer distances via the circulatory system; juxtacrine interactions; and autocrine signaling. Cells that produce paracrine factors secrete them into the immediate extracellular environment. Factors then travel to nearby cells in which the gradient of factor received determines the outcome. However, the exact distance that paracrine factors can travel is not certain.

Mechanotaxis refers to the directed movement of cell motility via mechanical cues. In response to fluidic shear stress, for example, cells have been shown to migrate in the direction of the fluid flow. Mechanotaxis is critical in many normal biological processes in animals, such as gastrulation, inflammation, and repair in response to a wound, as well as in mechanisms of diseases such as tumor metastasis.

A biochemical cascade, also known as a signaling cascade or signaling pathway, is a series of chemical reactions that occur within a biological cell when initiated by a stimulus. This stimulus, known as a first messenger, acts on a receptor that is transduced to the cell interior through second messengers which amplify the signal and transfer it to effector molecules, causing the cell to respond to the initial stimulus. Most biochemical cascades are series of events, in which one event triggers the next, in a linear fashion. At each step of the signaling cascade, various controlling factors are involved to regulate cellular actions, in order to respond effectively to cues about their changing internal and external environments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Angiomotin</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Angiomotin (AMOT) is a protein that in humans is encoded by the AMOT gene. It belongs to the motin family of angiostatin binding proteins, which includes angiomotin, angiomotin-like 1 (AMOTL1) and angiomotin-like 2 (AMOTL2) characterized by coiled-coil domains at N-terminus and consensus PDZ-binding domain at the C-terminus. Angiomotin is expressed predominantly in endothelial cells of capillaries as well as angiogenic tissues such as placenta and solid tumor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catenin</span>

Catenins are a family of proteins found in complexes with cadherin cell adhesion molecules of animal cells. The first two catenins that were identified became known as α-catenin and β-catenin. α-Catenin can bind to β-catenin and can also bind filamentous actin (F-actin). β-Catenin binds directly to the cytoplasmic tail of classical cadherins. Additional catenins such as γ-catenin and δ-catenin have been identified. The name "catenin" was originally selected because it was suspected that catenins might link cadherins to the cytoskeleton.

The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process by which epithelial cells lose their cell polarity and cell–cell adhesion, and gain migratory and invasive properties to become mesenchymal stem cells; these are multipotent stromal cells that can differentiate into a variety of cell types. EMT is essential for numerous developmental processes including mesoderm formation and neural tube formation. EMT has also been shown to occur in wound healing, in organ fibrosis and in the initiation of metastasis in cancer progression.

Biological crosstalk refers to instances in which one or more components of one signal transduction pathway affects another. This can be achieved through a number of ways with the most common form being crosstalk between proteins of signaling cascades. In these signal transduction pathways, there are often shared components that can interact with either pathway. A more complex instance of crosstalk can be observed with transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the cytoskeleton.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catenin beta-1</span> Mammalian protein found in Homo sapiens

Catenin beta-1, also known as β-catenin (beta-catenin), is a protein that in humans is encoded by the CTNNB1 gene.

Stem-cell niche refers to a microenvironment, within the specific anatomic location where stem cells are found, which interacts with stem cells to regulate cell fate. The word 'niche' can be in reference to the in vivo or in vitro stem-cell microenvironment. During embryonic development, various niche factors act on embryonic stem cells to alter gene expression, and induce their proliferation or differentiation for the development of the fetus. Within the human body, stem-cell niches maintain adult stem cells in a quiescent state, but after tissue injury, the surrounding micro-environment actively signals to stem cells to promote either self-renewal or differentiation to form new tissues. Several factors are important to regulate stem-cell characteristics within the niche: cell–cell interactions between stem cells, as well as interactions between stem cells and neighbouring differentiated cells, interactions between stem cells and adhesion molecules, extracellular matrix components, the oxygen tension, growth factors, cytokines, and the physicochemical nature of the environment including the pH, ionic strength and metabolites, like ATP, are also important. The stem cells and niche may induce each other during development and reciprocally signal to maintain each other during adulthood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T-cadherin</span> GPI-anchored signaling protein

T-cadherin, also known as cadherin 13, H-cadherin (heart), and CDH13, is a unique member of the cadherin superfamily of proteins because it lacks the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains common to all other cadherins and is instead anchored to the cell's plasma membrane by the GPI anchor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CYR61</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61) or CCN family member 1 (CCN1), is a matricellular protein that in humans is encoded by the CYR61 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">YAP1</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

YAP1, also known as YAP or YAP65, is a protein that acts as a transcription coregulator that promotes transcription of genes involved in cellular proliferation and suppressing apoptotic genes. YAP1 is a component in the hippo signaling pathway which regulates organ size, regeneration, and tumorigenesis. YAP1 was first identified by virtue of its ability to associate with the SH3 domain of Yes and Src protein tyrosine kinases. YAP1 is a potent oncogene, which is amplified in various human cancers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cadherin-1</span> Human protein-coding gene

Cadherin-1 or Epithelial cadherin(E-cadherin), is a protein that in humans is encoded by the CDH1 gene. Mutations are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid, and ovarian cancers. CDH1 has also been designated as CD324. It is a tumor suppressor gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WWTR1</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

WW domain-containing transcription regulator protein 1 (WWTR1), also known as Transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), is a protein that in humans is encoded by the WWTR1 gene. WWTR1 acts as a transcriptional coregulator and has no effect on transcription alone. When in complex with transcription factor binding partners, WWTR1 helps promote gene expression in pathways associated with development, cell growth and survival, and inhibiting apoptosis. Aberrant WWTR1 function has been implicated for its role in driving cancers. WWTR1 is often referred to as TAZ due to its initial characterization with the name TAZ. However, WWTR1 (TAZ) is not to be confused with the protein tafazzin, which originally held the official gene symbol TAZ, and is now TAFAZZIN.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hippo signaling pathway</span> Signaling pathway that controls organ size

The Hippo signaling pathway, also known as the Salvador-Warts-Hippo (SWH) pathway, is a signaling pathway that controls organ size in animals through the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. The pathway takes its name from one of its key signaling components—the protein kinase Hippo (Hpo). Mutations in this gene lead to tissue overgrowth, or a "hippopotamus"-like phenotype.

Pancreatic stellate cells (PaSCs) are classified as myofibroblast-like cells that are located in exocrine regions of the pancreas. PaSCs are mediated by paracrine and autocrine stimuli and share similarities with the hepatic stellate cell. Pancreatic stellate cell activation and expression of matrix molecules constitute the complex process that induces pancreatic fibrosis. Synthesis, deposition, maturation and remodelling of the fibrous connective tissue can be protective, however when persistent it impedes regular pancreatic function.

Cell–cell interaction refers to the direct interactions between cell surfaces that play a crucial role in the development and function of multicellular organisms. These interactions allow cells to communicate with each other in response to changes in their microenvironment. This ability to send and receive signals is essential for the survival of the cell. Interactions between cells can be stable such as those made through cell junctions. These junctions are involved in the communication and organization of cells within a particular tissue. Others are transient or temporary such as those between cells of the immune system or the interactions involved in tissue inflammation. These types of intercellular interactions are distinguished from other types such as those between cells and the extracellular matrix. The loss of communication between cells can result in uncontrollable cell growth and cancer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alan Hall</span> British cell biologist and professor

Alan Hall FRS was a British cell biologist and a biology professor at the Sloan-Kettering Institute, where he was chair of the Cell Biology program. Hall was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1999.

Barry James Thompson is an Australian and British developmental biologist and cancer biologist. Thompson is known for identifying genes, proteins and mechanisms involved in epithelial polarity, morphogenesis and cell signaling via the Wnt and Hippo signaling pathways, which have key roles in human cancer.

References

  1. ↑ Abercrombie, M. (September 1970). "Contact inhibition in tissue culture". In Vitro. 6 (2): 128–142. doi:10.1007/BF02616114. PMID   4943054. S2CID   11554527.
  2. ↑ Stoker, M.G. (1967). "Density dependent inhibition of cell growth in culture". Nature. 215 (5097): 171–172. Bibcode:1967Natur.215..171S. doi:10.1038/215171a0. PMID   6049107. S2CID   4150783.
  3. ↑ Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R. (7 January 2000). "The Hallmarks of Cancer" (PDF). Cell. 100 (1): 57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9 . PMID   10647931 . Retrieved 11 November 2016.
  4. ↑ Wieser, R.J.; Oesch, F. (August 1986). "Contact Inhibition of Growth of Human Diploid Fibroblasts by Immobilized Plasma Membrane Glycoproteins". Journal of Cell Biology. 103 (2): 361–367. doi:10.1083/jcb.103.2.361. PMC   2113841 . PMID   3733871.
  5. ↑ Nelson, C.M.; Chen, C.S. (March 2002). "Cell-cell signaling by direct contact increases cell proliferation via a PI3K-dependent signal". FEBS Letters. 514 (2–3): 238–242. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02370-0 . PMID   11943158.
  6. ↑ Shraiman, B. (July 2004). "Mechanical feedback as a possible regulator of tissue growth". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (9): 3318–3323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404782102 . PMC   552900 . PMID   15728365.
  7. ↑ Levine, E.; Becker, Y. (February 1965). "Contact Inhibition, Macromolecular Synthesis, and Polyribosomes in Cultured Human Diploid Fibroblasts". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 53 (2): 350–356. Bibcode:1965PNAS...53..350L. doi: 10.1073/pnas.53.2.350 . PMC   219519 . PMID   14294068.
  8. ↑ Seluanov, Andrei; Hine, Christopher; Azpurua, Jorge; Feigenson, Marina; Bozzella, Michael; Mao, Zhiyong; Catania, Kenneth C.; Gorbunova, Vera (26 October 2009). "Hypersensitivity to contact inhibition provides a clue to cancer resistance of naked mole-rat". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (46): 19352–19357. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10619352S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905252106 . PMC   2780760 . PMID   19858485.
  9. ↑ Yu, F.; Guan, K. (2013). "The Hippo pathway: regulators and regulations". Genes & Development. 27 (4): 355–371. doi:10.1101/gad.210773.112. PMC   3589553 . PMID   23431053.
  10. ↑ Gumbiner, B.; Kim, N. (2014). "The Hippo-YAP signaling pathway and contact inhibition of growth". Journal of Cell Science. 127 (4): 709–717. doi:10.1242/jcs.140103. PMC   3924201 . PMID   24532814.
  11. ↑ Gumbiner, B.; Stevenson, B. (October 1988). "The role of the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin in the formation and maintenance of the epithelial junctional complex". Journal of Cell Biology. 107 (4): 1575–1587. doi:10.1083/jcb.107.4.1575. PMC   2115263 . PMID   3049625.
  12. ↑ Nam-Gyun, K.; Koh, E. (July 2011). "E-cadherin mediates contact inhibition of proliferation through Hippo signaling-pathway components". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (29): 11930–11935. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10811930K. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103345108 . PMC   3141988 . PMID   21730131.
  13. ↑ Gottardi, C.; Wong, E. (May 2001). "E-Cadherin Suppresses Cellular Transformation by Inhibiting β-Catenin Signaling in an Adhesion-Independent Manner". Journal of Cell Biology. 153 (5): 1049–1060. doi:10.1083/jcb.153.5.1049. PMC   2174337 . PMID   11381089.
  14. ↑ Leontieva, O.; Blagosklonny, M. (December 2010). "DNA damaging agents and p53 do not cause senescence in quiescent cells, while consecutive re-activation of mTOR is associated with conversion to senescence". Aging. 2 (12): 924–935. doi:10.18632/aging.100265. PMC   3034181 . PMID   21212465.
  15. ↑ Puliafito, A.; Hufnagel, L. (November 2011). "Collective and single cell behavior in epithelial contact inhibition". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (3): 739–744. arXiv: 1112.0465 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007809109 . PMC   3271933 . PMID   22228306.
  16. ↑ Stoker, M.G. (1967). "Density dependent inhibition of cell growth in culture". Nature. 215 (5097): 171–172. Bibcode:1967Natur.215..171S. doi:10.1038/215171a0. PMID   6049107. S2CID   4150783.
  17. ↑ Leontieva, O.; Demidenko, Z. (June 2014). "Contact inhibition and high cell density deactivate the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, thus suppressing the senescence progra". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (24): 8832–8837. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.8832L. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405723111 . PMC   4066505 . PMID   24889617.
  18. ↑ Bell, P. (February 1978). "Contact inhibition of movements in transformed and nontransformed cells". Birth Defects Original Article Series. 14 (2): 177–194. PMID   346078.
  19. ↑ Roycroft, A.; Mayor, R. (July 2015). "Forcing contact inhibition of locomotion". Trends in Cell Biology. 25 (7): 373–375. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2015.05.001. PMC   4509518 . PMID   25981318.
  20. ↑ Abercombie, M.; Heaysman, J. (1953). "Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture: I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts". Cell. 5 (1): 111–131. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(53)90098-6. PMID   13083622.
  21. ↑ Davis, J.R.; Luchici, A. (April 2015). "Inter-cellular forces orchestrate contact inhibition of locomotion". Cell. 161 (2): 361–363. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.015. PMC   4398973 . PMID   25799385.
  22. ↑ Weiser, R.J.; Doris Renauer (1985). "Involvement of plasma membrane glycoproteins in the contact-dependent inhibition of growth of human fibroblasts". Experimental Cell Research. 158 (2): 493–499. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(85)90472-0. PMID   3924641.
  23. ↑ Lackie, John M. The Dictionary of Cell & Molecular Biology, Third Edition. Academic Press.
  24. ↑ Abercrombie, M. (27 September 1979). "Contact inhibition and malignancy". Nature. 281 (5729): 259–262. Bibcode:1979Natur.281..259A. doi:10.1038/281259a0. PMID   551275. S2CID   4322058.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.