Contio

Last updated

The contio (plural 'contiones', from the Latin word 'conventio', meaning 'gathering') was a public assembly in Ancient Rome, which existed during the monarchy as well as in the Roman Republic and Roman Empire. [1] At the contio, magistrates informed the Roman citizens on various topics related to politics. The main difference between the contio and other public assemblies in Rome, such as the comitia, is that the citizens who attended contiones did not get to vote. The contio merely served a communicative function, offering magistrates the opportunity to give the people a report of what had been decided during a senate meeting or to discuss a proposed legislative bill ( rogatio) in front of the citizens to help them make up their mind before they had to vote on it in other assemblies. [2] Magistrates also used the contio as a means of self-promotion, presenting themselves as capable and honest politicians who kept the interests of the people in mind (in other words, adhered to the popularis ideology), hoping to gain sympathy and support from the people. [3]

Contents

Aside from this political assembly, the word 'contio' could also refer to a type of Roman military speech. On this type of contiones, see section 5.

Function in Roman politics

The practice of holding contiones is said to have started under the Roman Monarchy, where the king (rex) was the only one who could summon a contio as well as the sole person who had the right to speak at this assembly. Therefore the contio is assumed to have originated earlier than the other public assemblies in Ancient Rome, since voting assemblies did not yet exist under the monarchy. [4]

The procedure and the function of contiones changed in the Republic and Empire. Every magistrate, as well as tribunes of the people, got the right to call a contio and address the crowd, or invite others to give a speech on a topic of the convener's choice. [5] In theory, a contio could be held anytime, on any day. [6] However, contiones were usually held on two specific occasions: right after a senate meeting and when a new legislative bill (rogatio) had been proposed.

Giving a report after a senate meeting

It was a common practice to hold a contio right after a senate meeting, to inform citizens about what had been discussed during the meeting and what decrees had been made. The magistrate who presided over the senate meeting decided who got to speak at this contio. He could choose to address the crowd himself or invite other senators to give a speech. Magistrates who were opposed to a decree that had been presented at this first contio, often chose to hold their own contio a few days later, to share their different perspective. Roman citizens could not attend senate meetings themselves, for only senators were allowed inside the curia during those meetings. Therefore the contio was an important source of information for citizens to who wanted to know what was going on in politics. [7]

Discussing a bill (rogatio)

Contiones formed a necessary step in the legislative process of validating new laws. When a magistrate or tribune wanted to propose a legislative bill (rogatio) which had to be validated by the voting process in the comitia, the rules for legislative processes ordained the bill to be presented and discussed from various points of view before the people in contiones first. This allowed people to make up their minds on the bill before voting and gave supporters as well as opponents of the bill a chance to share their views and shape public opinion, either in favor of the bill or against it. [8]

Other occasions

The two situations described above were the most common occasions on which a contio was held, but there were several special occasions on which this assembly could be summoned as well: [9]

The audience

In theory, every Roman citizen had the right to attend contiones. [10] The crowd at this assembly was seen as a representation of the Roman people (populus) and therefore also referred to by speakers as populus (or Quirites.). [11] However, it is generally assumed that the audience mainly consisted of citizens living within the city of Rome, for those city-dwellers had easier access to the voting assemblies in which they would vote on the bills (rogationes) that were the topic of many contiones. They also seem to have been more willing to participate in politics than their fellow citizens from other areas. [12] Over time, two distinct theories, which try to explain the composition of the audience in more detail, have developed. One theory assumes that contiones were mainly attended by lower-class locals, who lived near the forum on which the assembly gathered, while the second theory states that the crowd mainly consisted of well-to-do, high class citizens:

Theory 1: an audience of lower-class locals

This first theory implies that the largest part of the crowd at every contio consisted of the same group of local shopkeepers who lived near the forum and who sometimes seem to even have closed their businesses to attend a contio. These lower-class shopkeepers would have had the most to gain from the measures that were discussed at the contio, such as grain distributions, and therefore they would have been the most interested to go. According to this theory, these shopkeepers were joined by other lower-class Romans who sought to escape their narrow housing conditions by hanging out in public places such as the forum. Therefore, the majority of the crowd would have consisted of lower-class Romans. [13]

Theory 2: an audience of high class citizens

A second major theory states that the audience was mainly made up of wealthy, higher-class Romans. According to this theory, regularly attending contiones would have been easier for these well-to-do individuals, since they had more time to spare than lower-class citizens. Moreover, these higher-class Romans would have had the education that was needed to appreciate and understand the argumentation the magistrates used in their speeches, which sometimes included complicated references to history or law. Lastly, this theory states that this class of citizens would have been the most interesting for magistrates to influence through contiones, since these wealthy individuals would in turn have influenced the political opinion among lower-class Romans through patron-client relationships. [14]

Preserved speeches and other ancient sources

Despite the frequency with which contiones were held, very few of the speeches delivered in this assembly are fully preserved until this day. Many contio speeches have been lost over time or have never been recorded in the first place, likely because the topics with which they dealt were not significant enough or because the speaker did not use interesting or engaging rhetorical strategies. [15]

Cicero is our main source for this type of oratory. [16] The table below gives an overview of all of his extant contio speeches.

Preserved contio speeches
TitleDelivered inTopic
Pro Lege Manilia/

De imperio Cn. Pompei

66 BCIn support of a law proposal by C. Manilius, to assign the command in the war against Mithridates to Pompey. [17]
De Lege Agraria 2 63 BCInaugural speech to the people in Cicero's consular year. Advising against an agrarian law proposed by Rullus, a tribune of the people. (Forms a pair with De Lege Agraria 1 in which he discusses the same topic before the senate) [18]
De Lege Agraria 3 63 BCShort speech on a specific section of the agrarian law discussed in De Lege Agraria 2. [18]
In Catilinam 2 63 BCInforming the people that Catiline had fled the city after Cicero had asked him to leave in his senate speech known as In Catilinam 1. [19]
In Catilinam 3 63 BCInforming the people how evidence for Catiline's conspiracy was found. [20]
Post Reditum ad Quirites 57 BCExpressing gratitude to the people after Cicero had been allowed to return to Rome after his exile. [21]
Philippic 4 44 BCInforming the people of the senate's decision to honor certain individuals, among whom the young Octavian, for the actions they took against Marcus Antonius, interpreting this as a decision to proclaim Antonius a public enemy. (this speech forms a pair with Philippic 3) [22]
Philippic 6 43 BCInforming the people of the senate's decision to send an embassy to Marcus Antonius for peace negotiations. [23]

Aside from the ones in the table above, no contio speeches have been fully preserved. There are, however, a few other ancient sources which provide knowledge on this topic. Historiographic works, mainly those of Sallust (a 1st century BC. Roman historiographer) describe some speeches that have been held at the contio on significant topics in Roman history. [24] Moreover, Cicero comments on contiones in several of his works: in De Oratore , we find some theoretical remarks on how to address this assembly (eg. De Oratore 2.333-240) and his letters to Atticus include some references to the contio as well (eg. Att. 7.8.5). [25]

Rhetoric

Judging from the ancient source material described above, speeches delivered at the contio seem to have shared several rhetorical and argumentative characteristics. This list gives an overview of such common characteristics of speeches addressed to this assembly:

Military contiones

Aside from the political assembly, the word 'contio' could also refer to a type of military speech in which a commander addressed his troops. The rules for summoning contiones of this kind were similar to those for the political assembly: under the monarchy only the king (rex) had the right to do so, while later, during the Republic, every magistrate received this right. They usually appointed the general as the only speaker. Military contiones shared the communicative character of their political counterparts: they did not serve to cast votes or make decisions. A military contio could be held on various occasions: [33]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Triumvirate</span> Alliance between Roman politicians Caesar, Pompey and Crassus

The First Triumvirate was an informal political alliance among three prominent politicians in the late Roman Republic: Gaius Julius Caesar, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus and Marcus Licinius Crassus. The constitution of the Roman republic had many veto points. In order to bypass constitutional obstacles and force through the political goals of the three men, they forged in secret an alliance where they promised to use their respective influence to support each other. The "triumvirate" was not a formal magistracy, nor did it achieve a lasting domination over state affairs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plebeians</span> General body of free ancient Roman citizens who were not patricians

In ancient Rome, the plebeians were the general body of free Roman citizens who were not patricians, as determined by the census, or in other words "commoners". Both classes were hereditary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizens' assemblies of the Roman Republic</span> Political institutions in Roman Republic

The legislative assemblies of the Roman Republic were political institutions in the ancient Roman Republic. According to the contemporary historian Polybius, it was the people who had the final say regarding the election of magistrates, the enactment of Roman laws, the carrying out of capital punishment, the declaration of war and peace, and the creation of alliances. Under the Constitution of the Roman Republic, the people held the ultimate source of sovereignty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optimates and populares</span> Political labels in the Roman Republic

Optimates and populares are labels applied to politicians, political groups, traditions, strategies, or ideologies in the late Roman Republic. There is "heated academic discussion" as to whether Romans would have recognised an ideological content or political split in the label.

Lucius Cornelius Sisenna was a Roman soldier, historian, and annalist. He was praetor in 78 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curiate Assembly</span> Peoples assembly in ancient rome

The Curiate Assembly was the principal assembly that evolved in shape and form over the course of the Roman Kingdom until the Comitia Centuriata organized by Servius Tullius. During these first decades, the people of Rome were organized into thirty units called "Curiae". The Curiae were ethnic in nature, and thus were organized on the basis of the early Roman family, or, more specifically, on the basis of the thirty original patrician (aristocratic) clans. The Curiae formed an assembly for legislative, electoral, and judicial purposes. The Curiate Assembly passed laws, elected Consuls, and tried judicial cases. Consuls always presided over the assembly. While plebeians (commoners) could participate in this assembly, only the patricians could vote.

Publius Vatinius was a Roman politician during the last decades of the Republic. He served as a Caesarian-allied plebeian tribune in the year 59 – he was the tribune that proposed the law giving Caesar his Gallic command – and later fought on that side of the civil war. Caesar made him consul in 47 BC; he later fought in Illyricum for the Caesarians and celebrated a triumph for his victories there in 42 BC.

The term accensi is applied to two different groups. Originally, the accensi were light infantry in the armies of the early Roman Republic. They were the poorest men in the legion, and could not afford much equipment. They did not wear armour or carry shields, and their usual position was part of the third battle line. They fought in a loose formation, supporting the heavier troops. They were eventually phased out by the time of Second Punic War. In the later Roman Republic the term was used for civil servants who assisted the elected magistrates, particularly in the courts, where they acted as ushers and clerks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comitium</span> Original open-air public meeting space of Ancient Rome

The Comitium was the original open-air public meeting space of Ancient Rome, and had major religious and prophetic significance. The name comes from the Latin word for "assembly". The Comitium location at the northwest corner of the Roman Forum was later lost in the city's growth and development, but was rediscovered and excavated by archaeologists at the turn of the twentieth century. Some of Rome's earliest monuments; including the speaking platform known as the Rostra, the Columna Maenia, the Graecostasis and the Tabula Valeria were part of or associated with the Comitium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the Roman Republic</span> Norms, customs, and written laws, which guided the government of the Roman Republic

The constitution of the Roman Republic was a set of uncodified norms and customs which, together with various written laws, guided the procedural governance of the Roman Republic. The constitution emerged from that of the Roman kingdom, evolved substantively and significantly—almost to the point of unrecognisability—over the almost five hundred years of the republic. The collapse of republican government and norms from 133 BC would lead to the rise of Augustus and his principate.

<i>Philippicae</i> Speeches by Cicero condemning Mark Antony (44–43 BCE)

The Philippics are a series of 14 speeches composed by Cicero in 44 and 43 BC, condemning Mark Antony. Cicero likened these speeches to those of Demosthenes against Philip II of Macedon; both Demosthenes’s and Cicero's speeches became known as Philippics. Cicero's Second Philippic is styled after Demosthenes' De Corona.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribal Assembly</span> Assembly of the Roman Republic

The Tribal Assembly was an assembly consisting of all Roman citizens convened by tribes (tribus).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Writings of Cicero</span> Historical Roman statesman, theorist, and philosopher

The writings of Marcus Tullius Cicero constitute one of the most renowned collections of historical and philosophical work in all of classical antiquity. Cicero was a Roman politician, lawyer, orator, political theorist, philosopher, and constitutionalist who lived during the years of 106–43 BC. He held the positions of Roman senator and Roman consul (chief-magistrate) and played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. He was extant during the rule of prominent Roman politicians, such as those of Julius Caesar, Pompey, and Marc Antony. Cicero is widely considered one of Rome's greatest orators and prose stylists.

<i>Rogatio</i> Ancient Roman legislative process

In Roman constitutional law, rogatio is the term for a legislative bill placed before an Assembly of the People in ancient Rome. The rogatio procedure underscores the fact that the Roman Senate could issue decrees, but was not a legislative or parliamentarian body. Only the People could pass legislation.

Catherine Elizabeth Wannan Steel, is a British classical scholar. She is Professor of Classics at the University of Glasgow. Steel is an expert on the Roman Republic, the writings of Cicero, and Roman oratory.

Annales is the name of a fragmentary Latin epic poem written by the Roman poet Ennius in the 2nd century BC. While only snippets of the work survive today, the poem's influence on Latin literature was significant. Although written in Latin, stylistically it borrows from the Greek poetic tradition, particularly the works of Homer, and is written in dactylic hexameter. The poem was significantly larger than others from the period, and eventually comprised 18 books.

The lex Cassia de senatu was a Roman law, introduced in 104 BC by the tribune L. Cassius Longinus. The law excluded from the senate individuals who had been deprived of imperium by popular vote or had been convicted of a crime in a popular assembly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ballot laws of the Roman Republic</span> Ancient Roman laws

The ballot laws of the Roman Republic were four laws which introduced the secret ballot to all popular assemblies in the Republic. They were all introduced by tribunes, and consisted of the lex Gabinia tabellaria of 139 BC, applying to the election of magistrates; the lex Cassia tabellaria of 137 BC, applying to juries except in cases of treason; the lex Papiria of 131 BC, applying to the passing of laws; and the lex Caelia of 107 BC, which expanded the lex Cassia to include matters of treason. Prior to the ballot laws, voters announced their votes orally to a teller, essentially making every vote public. The ballot laws curtailed the influence of the aristocratic class and expanded the freedom of choice for voters. Elections became more competitive. In short, the secret ballot made bribery more difficult.

Lucius Vettius was a Roman equestrian informer who informed on the Second Catilinarian conspiracy in 63 BC and later, in 59 BC, denounced a supposed plot of many conservative-leaning senators to murder Pompey. He was jailed and then found dead.

References

  1. ↑ Pina-Polo, Francisco (1995). "Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military contiones in Rome". Klio. 77: 205–206, 211–212.
  2. ↑ Van der Blom, Henriette (2016). Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 34. ISBN   9781107280281.
  3. ↑ Tan, James (April 2008). "Contiones in the Age of Cicero". Classical Antiquity. 27: 163–166. doi:10.1525/ca.2008.27.1.163 – via JSTOR.
  4. ↑ Pina Polo, Francisco (1995). "Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military contiones in Ancient Rome". Klio. 77: 205–206.
  5. ↑ Van der Blom, Henriette (2016). Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 33–34. ISBN   9781107280281.
  6. ↑ Pina-Polo, Francisco (1995). "Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military contiones in the Roman Republic". Klio. 77: 207.
  7. ↑ Morstein-Marx, Robert (2009). Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 246–248. ISBN   9780511482878.
  8. ↑ Pina-Polo, Francisco (1995). "Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military contiones in Rome". Klio. 77: 207–208.
  9. ↑ Pina-Polo, Francisco (1995). "Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military contiones in Rome". Klio. 77: 209–211.
  10. ↑ Pina-Polo, Francisco (1995). "Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military contiones in Ancient Rome". Klio. 77: 207.
  11. ↑ Mouritsen, Henrik (2017). Politics in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 75. ISBN   9781139410861.
  12. ↑ Jehne, Martin (2013). "Feeding the Plebs with Words". In Steel, Catherine; Van der Blom, Henriette (eds.). Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 51. ISBN   9780199641895.
  13. ↑ Tan, James (April 2008). "Contiones in the Age of Cicero". Classical Antiquity. 27: 172–180 – via JSTOR.
  14. ↑ Mouritsen, Henrik (2017). Politics in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 73–79. ISBN   9781139410861.
  15. ↑ Tan, James (April 2008). "Contiones in the Age of Cicero". Classical Antiquity. 27: 170 – via JSTOR.
  16. ↑ Manuwald, Gesine (Spring 2012). "The speeches to the People in Cicero's oratorical corpora". Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. 30– via JSTOR.
  17. ↑ Jehne, Martin (2013). "Feeding the Plebs with Words: The Significance of Senatorial Public Oratory in The Small World of Roman Politics". In Steel, Catherine; Van der Blom, Henriëtte (eds.). Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 53–58. ISBN   9780199641895.
  18. 1 2 Manuwald, Gesine (2018). Agrarian speeches: introduction, text, translation and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780198715405.
  19. ↑ Manuwald, Gesine (Spring 2012). "The Speeches to the People in Cicero's oratorical corpora". Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. 30: 162–163 – via JSTOR.
  20. ↑ Manuwald, Gesine (Spring 2012). "The Speeches to the People in Cicero's oratorical corpora". Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. 30: 165 – via JSTOR.
  21. ↑ Watts, N. H. (1923). "The speeches delivered by Cicero after his return from exile: introduction". Cicero Volume XI. Loeb Classical Library (158). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 45. ISBN   9780674991743.
  22. ↑ Manuwald, Gesine (Spring 2012). "The Speeches to the People in Cicero's oratorical corpora". Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. 30: 170–171 – via JSTOR.
  23. ↑ Manuwald, Gesine (Spring 2012). "The Speeches to the People in Cicero's oratorical corpora". Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. 30: 172.
  24. ↑ Tan, James (April 2008). "Contiones in the Age of Cicero". Classical Antiquity. 27: 164 – via JSTOR.
  25. ↑ Mouritsen, Henrik (2013). "From Meeting to Text: The Contio in the Late Republic". In Steel, Catherine; Van der Blom, Henriette (eds.). Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 63–71. ISBN   9780199641895.
  26. ↑ Jehne, Martin (2013). "Feeding the Plebs with Words". In Steel, Catherine; Van der Blom, Henriette (eds.). Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 55. ISBN   9780199641895.
  27. ↑ Jehne, Martin (2013). "Feeding the Plebs with Words". In Steel, Catherine; Van der Blom, Henriette (eds.). Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 59. ISBN   9780199641895.
  28. ↑ Morstein-Marx, Robert (2004). "Contional ideology: the political drama". Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 242. ISBN   9780511482878.
  29. ↑ Morstein-Marx, Robert (2004). "Contional ideology: the political drama". Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 251. ISBN   9780511482878.
  30. ↑ Van der Blom, Henriette (2016). Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 36–37. ISBN   9781107280281.
  31. ↑ Morstein-Marx, Robert (2004). "Contional ideology: the political drama". Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 271. ISBN   9780511482878.
  32. ↑ Morstein-Marx, Robert (2004). "The Voice of the People". Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–143. ISBN   9780511482878.
  33. ↑ Pina-Polo, Francisco (1995). "Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military contiones in Rome". Klio. 77: 213–215.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.