Corporate tax in the Netherlands

Last updated

Netherlands benefits from a strategic geographic location, a world-class economy, a stable political climate, and a skilled workforce. The Netherlands has a large network of tax treaties, a low corporate income tax rate and a full participation exemption for capital gains and profits. These characteristics, in addition to a favorable tax environment, make Netherlands one of the most open economies in the world for multinational corporations (MNCs). [1]

Contents

Overview


Corporate tax in the Netherlands deals with the tax payable in the Netherlands on the profits earned by companies. For tax purposes, a company formed under Dutch law is considered a resident of the Netherlands and personal and business income taxes are levied in the Netherlands on worldwide income earned by tax residents. Non-residents who operate a business in the Netherlands are subject to personal or corporate income tax in the Netherlands. As of January 1, 2022, the normal Corporate Income Tax Rate (CIT) rate is 25.8 percent (25 percent in 2021). There are two income tax brackets. The first income bracket is subject to a lower rate of 15%. This tax level has been increased to EUR 395,000 in taxable income (EUR 245,000 in 2021). The excess of taxable income is taxed at the usual rate. [2]

Profits earned by both public and private enterprises are normally subject to corporate income tax. Foundations and associations may be required to file corporate income tax reports in specific circumstances. Certain types of income, however, can be exempted or excluded from the tax base. When it comes to income from Dutch sources, non-resident entities only have a limited tax liability. Corporate income tax is not paid by some legal entities, such as fiscal investment institutions. Some legal entities may be free from corporate income tax if they invest jointly. [3]

Dividends distributed by Dutch resident corporations with capital divided into shares are subject to a withholding tax in the Netherlands. The general rate of dividend withholding tax that Dutch resident corporations are generally subject to pay is 15%. A double taxation treaty can lower the withholding tax rate for international receivers. Furthermore, dividends may be free from taxation in the Netherlands, subject to anti-abuse rules, if both of the following conditions are met:

The Netherlands has committed to accept the minimum criteria (primary purposes test and dispute resolution) as well as some optional aspects of the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI). [5]

A value-added tax (VAT) is levied in addition to income tax in compliance with EU Directives. The final burden of VAT is borne by the end consumer. This goal is met by subtracting the amount of input VAT paid on supplies by an entrepreneur from the amount of output VAT charged on goods or services supplied or rendered by the business. The tax authorities in the Netherlands should be paid the positive balance. [6]

Dutch Tax and Customs Administration

The Dutch Tax and Customs Administration (Belastingdienst) is in charge of administrating the Netherlands' tax system, and it operates through a network of regional offices and centralized information centers. The Dutch tax authorities treat taxpayers with professionalism and cooperation. Qualifying corporate taxpayers can participate in a horizontal monitoring program, which is a cooperative compliance program. A covenant is reached between a taxpayer and the Dutch tax authorities under the horizontal monitoring program, in which the taxpayer pledges to providing information proactively and discusses any concerns in advance during frequent meetings with the Dutch tax inspector. The goal is to give the taxpayer more certainty about his or her tax situation in the Netherlands. [7]

Ahead-of-time certainty is also available in the shape of an advance tax ruling. Only enterprises with a substantial economic connection with the country can get a tax ruling. For this to happen, the firm requesting the ruling should be a member of a group that performs economic operational activities in the Netherlands, and these economic operational activities should be undertaken by or for the company's account and risk. [8] If the other jurisdictions concerned in the ruling are members of the EU or are parties to a treaty with the Netherlands that allows for information exchange, information on the ruling will be automatically shared with the tax authorities in other jurisdictions. [9]

History of corporate tax rates

From 1981 to 2021, the corporate tax rate in the Netherlands has decreased by about half. It peaked at 48 percent in 1982 and fell to a new low of 25 percent in 2011. [10] The corporate tax rate dropped massively from 35 percent to 29.5 percent in 2006, and further to 25.5 percent in 2007. In 2006, the corporate local tax rate was decreased from 15% to 10%, and then to 5.5 percent in 2007. As a result, the absolute tax rates were reduced by 5.5 percent in 2006 and by 4 percent in 2007. Companies can save money on taxes by transferring income tax from 2006 or 2007 to a later year. As a result, executives can defer income tax to a lower tax tariff cycle. This tax reform, in theory, encouraged management to manage earnings in order to reduce tax payments. [11]

The 2019 Dutch corporate tax rate was 19% of the taxable income up to and including (euro) € 200,000, above which the rate was 25%. The lower rate decreased to 16.5% in 2020. In 2021 the rate for the first bracket further decreased to 15% with taxable income up to € 245,000. [12] The top Dutch corporate tax rate instead remained stable at 25%. As of 2022, the corporate tax rate stands at 15% for income below €395,000, above which the rate was 25.8%. These rates have been lowered by the Dutch government to stimulate a competitive tax environment for international businesses. [13]

Corporate tax fines in the Netherlands

The Netherlands tax system is administered by the “Belastingdienst” which is part of the Ministry of Finance. The Netherlands tax authority is accountable for the imposition or collection of any Tax. [14]

Corporate tax is collected based on the company’s profit during the year. As a rule, the corporate tax year follows the calendar year from 1 January to 31 December. However, companies can have options to choose a different financial year for reasonable purposes. If the company fails to pay corporate tax on time, they have to pay interest which starts from the day after the tax due date. If the company pays tax after the due dates, the tax authority regards them as debt. Therefore, they charge the company the recovery interest. The recovery interest is calculated based on the following:

A 4% interest fee is usually charged to payments that are made after the due date. The table below illustrates the interest percentages which are determined biannually. [15]

Periodpercentage
From 1-1-20244
From 7/1/2023 to 12/31/20233
From 1-1-2023 to 30-6-20232
From 1-7-2022 to 31-12-20221
From 3/23/2020 to 6/30/20220.01
From 4/1/2014 to 3/22/20204
1/1/2013 to 4/1/20143

Corporate Tax Fiscal Unity

Under Dutch tax laws, every company has to pay its own corporate income tax. When a parent company and its subsidiary companies form a tax group, they are treated as a single taxpayer. This means that instead of each company paying its own corporate income tax, it will be collected as a single entity. One of the advantages of forming a tax group is that if one company incurs a loss, it can be deducted from the profits of other companies. However, the parent company must have a significant level of control over its subsidiary. Firstly, the parent company should own at least 95% of the subsidiary's shares which entitles them to 95% or more of the subsidiary's profits. Secondly, the parent company should hold at least 95% voting rights in the subsidiary.  Besides both the parent company nad subsidiary must have the same financial year, apply the same accounting policies, and be established in the Netherlands. [16]

If a company is not based in the Netherlands, it would not fit the regular requirements for fiscal unity, which is a group of companies that can include both the Netherlands and non-Netherlands entities. However, if the members of the group include Netherlands companies, they can still form fiscal unity in two specific situations.

Exemptions

Certain items of income are exempt from Dutch corporate tax. The most important items of income that are exempt are:

Participation exemption

Capital gains, dividends and profit participation loan interest derived from a qualifying subsidiary are fully exempt from corporate tax in the Netherlands ("participation exemption"). A subsidiary qualifies for the Dutch participation exemption when:

Foreign branch

Any income received by a Dutch company from a foreign branch is exempt from Dutch corporate tax, provided such branch is a permanent establishment or representative. [17]

Anti-abuse clause

The Dutch Corporate income tax regulations have included a great many anti-avoidance clauses since 1969, to avoid abuse of the tax rules by corporations. There have been implemented anti abuse clauses for the participation exemption, interest deductions for hybrid loans and recently for the dividend withholding tax act. [18]

No exemptions

In certain cases, it may be advantageous to reject the exemption for your company such as allowing you to offset a loss. If this is the case, you must do so by sending a letter to your tax office before your corporation tax return for the first year of the five-year period is processed.

Tax haven

The Netherlands has been known internationally, since at least the 1970s, as a tax haven. A political debate about this issue started in 1977, when economist and social-democratic MP Flip de Kam published a book about corporations transferring large sums to Caribbean countries without paying Dutch corporate tax. Minister Van der Stee admitted that the country was internationally known as a tax haven, but refused to act, arguing that the problem could not be solved on a national level alone. [19] The debate raged for years; in 1986, Representative Willem Vermeend estimated that the country's tax service missed some ƒ4 billion per year due to companies such as The Rolling Stones' holding bv's using the "Caribbean route". [19]

Dutch tax laws have brought the country into conflict with the European Union several times, starting with strong criticism in the 1999 Primarolo Report. The Dutch government responded by having a group of high-ranking fiscal experts (known with the Ministry of Finance as the "Barbapapa group") create a smoke screen, changing the appearance of the fiscal system while leaving its structure intact. [19]

Starting 2009, the "tax haven" label resurfaced and sparked political controversy when the White House issued a press release in which the Netherlands was mentioned as tax haven. [20] [21] According to various NGO's the Netherlands "can be seen as an intermediary tax haven for foreign corporations". [22] [23] [24] In February 2013, the Dutch House of Representatives accepted a motion calling on cabinet members to "reject, and where possible in discussions to insist on not mentioning" the qualification of the country as a tax haven; the motion was drafted by MP Roland van Vliet, a former tax advisor with Ernst & Young. [25] Economist Ewald Engelen  [ nl ] estimated that at the time of the motion, the state earned some €1.5 billion in tax from €12 trillion being transferred through the country annually. [26]

As of 2013, the country harbors holding companies for various multinationals, participates in more than a hundred bilateral tax treaties, and the various exemptions facilitate tax avoidance by corporations. A notable example is most of the holdings of the Agnelli family which are incorporated there. [19] [24]

In June 2014 the EU initiated a new investigation relating to the Dutch corporate taxes as part of a State aid (European Union) case by the Directorate General for Competition. The case was specific to Starbucks. [27] The investigation ended in October 2015, with the EC ordering Starbucks to pay up to €30 million in overdue taxes. [28] The EC exposed in its decision a legal structure commonly used by companies established in the Netherlands to avoid corporate taxation, the so called Dutch BV-CV structure. [29] In 2017, the EU initiated another State aid (European Union) investigation into a special deal on corporate taxation between the Dutch public administration and IKEA. [30]

National and foreign companies known to have special agreements with the Dutch tax service include Starbucks, Microsoft and PostNL. A 2015 FOI request by de Volkskrant to unearth the agreements failed, because these secret agreements are not centrally administered by the Tax and Customs Administration; with even the House of Representatives not having access to them. [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

A dividend tax is a tax imposed by a jurisdiction on dividends paid by a corporation to its shareholders (stockholders). The primary tax liability is that of the shareholder, though a tax obligation may also be imposed on the corporation in the form of a withholding tax. In some cases the withholding tax may be the extent of the tax liability in relation to the dividend. A dividend tax is in addition to any tax imposed directly on the corporation on its profits. Some jurisdictions do not tax dividends.

Tax avoidance is the legal usage of the tax regime in a single territory to one's own advantage to reduce the amount of tax that is payable by means that are within the law. A tax shelter is one type of tax avoidance, and tax havens are jurisdictions that facilitate reduced taxes. Tax avoidance should not be confused with tax evasion, which is illegal.

A capital gains tax (CGT) is the tax on profits realized on the sale of a non-inventory asset. The most common capital gains are realized from the sale of stocks, bonds, precious metals, real estate, and property.

Income tax in the Netherlands is regulated by the Wet inkomstenbelasting 2001.

A corporate tax, also called corporation tax or company tax, is a type of direct tax levied on the income or capital of corporations and other similar legal entities. The tax is usually imposed at the national level, but it may also be imposed at state or local levels in some countries. Corporate taxes may be referred to as income tax or capital tax, depending on the nature of the tax.

Double taxation is the levying of tax by two or more jurisdictions on the same income, asset, or financial transaction.

International taxation is the study or determination of tax on a person or business subject to the tax laws of different countries, or the international aspects of an individual country's tax laws as the case may be. Governments usually limit the scope of their income taxation in some manner territorially or provide for offsets to taxation relating to extraterritorial income. The manner of limitation generally takes the form of a territorial, residence-based, or exclusionary system. Some governments have attempted to mitigate the differing limitations of each of these three broad systems by enacting a hybrid system with characteristics of two or more.

Tax consolidation, or combined reporting, is a regime adopted in the tax or revenue legislation of a number of countries which treats a group of wholly owned or majority-owned companies and other entities as a single entity for tax purposes. This generally means that the head entity of the group is responsible for all or most of the group's tax obligations. Consolidation is usually an all-or-nothing event: once the decision to consolidate has been made, companies are irrevocably bound. Only by having less than a 100% interest in a subsidiary can that subsidiary be left out of the consolidation.

Taxation in the Netherlands is defined by the income tax, the wage withholding tax, the value added tax and the corporate tax.

The Russian Tax Code is the primary tax law for the Russian Federation. The Code was created, adopted and implemented in three stages.

Taxation represents the biggest source of revenues for the Peruvian government. For 2016, the projected amount of taxation revenues was S/.94.6 billion. There are four taxes that make up approximately 90 percent of the taxation revenues:

Taxation in Greece is based on the direct and indirect systems. The total tax revenue in 2017 was €47.56 billion from which €20.62 billion came from direct taxes and €26.94 billion from indirect taxes. The total tax revenue represented 39.4% of GDP in 2017. Taxes in Greece are collected by the Independent Authority for Public Revenue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporate tax in the United States</span>

Corporate tax is imposed in the United States at the federal, most state, and some local levels on the income of entities treated for tax purposes as corporations. Since January 1, 2018, the nominal federal corporate tax rate in the United States of America is a flat 21% following the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. State and local taxes and rules vary by jurisdiction, though many are based on federal concepts and definitions. Taxable income may differ from book income both as to timing of income and tax deductions and as to what is taxable. The corporate Alternative Minimum Tax was also eliminated by the 2017 reform, but some states have alternative taxes. Like individuals, corporations must file tax returns every year. They must make quarterly estimated tax payments. Groups of corporations controlled by the same owners may file a consolidated return.

Participation exemption is a general term relating to an exemption from taxation for a shareholder in a company on dividends received, and potential capital gains arising on the sale of shares.

Taxes in Switzerland are levied by the Swiss Confederation, the cantons and the municipalities.

Taxes in Germany are levied by the federal government, the states (Länder) as well as the municipalities (Städte/Gemeinden). Many direct and indirect taxes exist in Germany; income tax and VAT are the most significant.

Taxation in Estonia consists of state and local taxes. A relatively high proportion of government revenue comes from consumption taxes whilst revenue from capital taxes is one of the lowest in the European Union.

The Tax Attractiveness Index (T.A.X.) indicates the attractiveness of a country's tax environment and the possibilities of tax planning for companies. The T.A.X. is constructed for 100 countries worldwide starting from 2005 on. The index covers 20 equally weighted components of real-world tax systems which are relevant for corporate location decisions. The index ranges between zero and one. The more the index values approaches one, the more attractive is the tax environment of a certain country from a corporate perspective. The 100 countries include 41 European countries, 19 American countries, 6 Caribbean countries, 18 countries that are located in Africa & Middle East, and 16 countries that fall into the Asia-Pacific region.

The organization responsible for tax policy in Ukraine is the State Fiscal Service, operating under the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. Taxation is legally regulated by the Taxation Code of Ukraine. The calendar year serves as a fiscal year in Ukraine. The most important sources of tax revenue in Ukraine are unified social security contributions, value added tax, individual income tax. In 2017 taxes collected formed 23% of GDP at ₴969.654 billion.

The European Union tax haven blacklist, officially the EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions, is a tool of the European Union (EU) that lists tax havens. It is used by the Member States to tackle external risks of tax abuse and unfair tax competition. It was adopted for the first time in 2017 as a response to tax avoidance in the EU, screening 92 countries. It is managed by the Code of Conduct Group for Business Taxation and monitored by the European Commission (EC). The most recent revision was released on 6 October 2020. The list is updated twice a year.

References

  1. Spenke, Gerrit te; Vries, Mark de (1 January 2011). Taxation in the Netherlands. Kluwer Law International B.V. ISBN   978-90-411-3167-6.
  2. "Netherlands - Corporate - Taxes on corporate income". taxsummaries.pwc.com. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  3. Zaken, Ministerie van Algemene (3 April 2014). "Corporate income tax - Taxation and businesses - Government.nl". www.government.nl. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  4. "Netherlands - Corporate - Withholding taxes". taxsummaries.pwc.com. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  5. "Should Developing Countries Sign the OECD Multilateral Instrument to Address Treaty-Related Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Measures?". Center for Global Development | Ideas to Action. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  6. Cnossen, Sijbren (1981). "Dutch Experience with the Value-Added Tax". FinanzArchiv / Public Finance Analysis. 39 (2): 223–254. ISSN   0015-2218. JSTOR   40911701.
  7. "Dutch Tax and Customs Administration". business.gov.nl. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  8. Janssen, Boudewijn (1 March 2005). "Corporate Effective Tax Rates in the Netherlands". De Economist. 153 (1): 47–66. doi:10.1007/s10645-004-7127-y. ISSN   1572-9982. S2CID   154321373.
  9. "EU rights and rules in the Netherlands". www.belastingdienst.nl. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  10. Bradford, David F. (1 February 1981). "The incidence and allocation effects of a tax on corporate distributions". Journal of Public Economics. 15 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(81)90049-9. ISSN   0047-2727.
  11. Wali, Kawa (6 November 2021). "The detection of earnings management through a decrease of corporate income tax". Future Business Journal. 7 (1): 36. doi: 10.1186/s43093-021-00083-8 . ISSN   2314-7210. S2CID   243842163.
  12. "Revenue Statistics 2021: The Initial Impact of COVID-19 on OECD Tax Revenues | en | OECD". www.oecd.org. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  13. "Netherlands - Corporate - Taxes on corporate income". taxsummaries.pwc.com. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  14. "Corporate tax in the Netherlands". Expatica Netherlands. Retrieved 16 April 2023.
  15. "Invorderingsrente, coulancerente en heffingsrente". www.belastingdienst.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 16 April 2023.
  16. Zaken, Ministerie van Algemene (3 April 2014). "Corporate income tax - Taxation and businesses - Government.nl". www.government.nl. Retrieved 16 April 2023.
  17. "Netherlands - Corporate - Income determination". taxsummaries.pwc.com. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
  18. "Amendments to anti-abuse provisions in Dutch tax legislation".
  19. 1 2 3 4 Vanheste, Tomas; Oberndorff, Map (6 August 2013). "Nederland belastingparadijs, met dank aan de PvdA" [The Netherlands a tax haven, thanks to the Labor Party]. Vrij Nederland .
  20. "The Netherlands a tax haven, a misunderstanding?". Tax Justice nl. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
  21. "US tax haven claim surprises Dutch". DutchNews.nl. 5 May 2009. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
  22. "New tax treaty policy prejudices developing countries". Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations. 20 April 2011. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
  23. Michielse, Geerten (24 February 2011). "Mag het een beetje minder koopman zijn?" (PDF) (in Dutch). Tijdschrift voor Fiscaal Recht.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  24. 1 2 "Dutch masters of tax avoidance". The Guardian . 19 October 2011.
  25. Smits, Henk Willem (19 February 2013). "Geert Wilders houdt wél van belastingparadijs Nederland" [Geert Wilders does love Holland, the tax haven].
  26. Engelen, Ewald (16 February 2013). "Nederland is een topplek voor belastingontwijking" [Holland is a great place for tax avoidance].
  27. "Starbucks Unit Swapped Millions of Euros for Roasting Art". Bloomberg. 14 November 2014.
  28. "Commission decides selective tax advantages for Fiat in Luxembourg and Starbucks in the Netherlands are illegal under EU state aid rules". European Commission. 21 October 2015.
  29. Vleggeert, J. (11 February 2016). "European Union/Netherlands - Dutch CV-BV Structures: Starbucks-Style Tax Planning and State Aid Rules". Bulletin for International Taxation. IBFD. 70 (3).
  30. "State aid: Commission opens in-depth investigation into the Netherlands' tax treatment of Inter IKEA". European Commission. 18 December 2017.
  31. "Belastingdienst: geen zicht op deals met bedrijven" [Tax Administration: no overview of deals with corporations]. De Volkskrant. 23 October 2015.