Court of Final Appeal (Hong Kong)

Last updated

Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal
香港終審法院
HongKongCourtOfFinalAppeal.svg
The logo features the Court of Final Appeal Building
Court of Final Appeal (Hong Kong)
22°16′51″N114°09′37″E / 22.28090°N 114.16035°E / 22.28090; 114.16035
Established1 July 1997;26 years ago (1997-07-01)
Location8 Jackson Road, Central,
Hong Kong [1]
Coordinates 22°16′51″N114°09′37″E / 22.28090°N 114.16035°E / 22.28090; 114.16035
Composition methodAppointment by the Chief Executive acting in accordance with the recommendation of the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission with Legislative Council endorsement
Authorized by Hong Kong Basic Law
Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance
Judge term lengthUntil retirement age of 70 for the Chief Justice and Permanent Judges, but this may be extended by two three-year terms, meaning retirement age can be extended to 76; no retirement age for non-permanent judges
Number of positionsOne Chief Justice, at least three permanent judges and at most 30 non-permanent judges
Website hkcfa.hk
Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal
Currently Andrew Cheung
Since11 January 2021

Role of the court

From the 1840s to 30 June 1997, Hong Kong was a British Dependent Territory, and the power of final adjudication on the laws of Hong Kong was vested in the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London. The power to exercise sovereignty over Hong Kong was transferred from the United Kingdom to the People's Republic of China on 1 July 1997. Based on the one country, two systems principle, Hong Kong retains a high degree of autonomy and maintains its own legal system. The Court of Final Appeal was established on 1 July 1997 in Central, Hong Kong. Since then, it has served as the court of last resort; the court has the power of final adjudication with respect to the law of Hong Kong as well as the power of final interpretation over local laws including the power to strike down local ordinances on the grounds of inconsistency with the Basic Law.

However, this power is not absolute; the court's decisions can be overturned by the Chinese government via a controversial process known as an "interpretation" via Article 158 of the Basic Law. [2] [3]

The Court of Final Appeal has no original jurisdiction; an appeal has to originate from the High Court (either from the Court of Appeal or the Court of First Instance).

Court structure

Judges

The Court of Final Appeal is made up of the Chief Justice, at least three Permanent Judges, and at most 30 non-permanent Judges who can come from Hong Kong or any overseas Common Law jurisdictions. Under the Basic Law, the constitutional document of Hong Kong, the special administrative region remains a common law jurisdiction. Judges from other common law jurisdictions can be recruited and serve in the judiciary as non-permanent judges according to Article 92 of the Basic Law; to date, Judges appointed have served in the judiciaries of England and Wales, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. Aside from the Chief Justice, there is no nationality requirement for any of the permanent or non-permanent judges.

Allowing an appeal

Whether an appeal is allowed or not is determined by a panel of three Hong Kong judges, usually the Chief Justice and two other permanent judges. Should the Chief Justice or a permanent judge not be available, the other permanent judge or a non-permanent judge from Hong Kong may be called in. Non-permanent judges from other jurisdictions do not sit on such panels.

Hearing an appeal

All appeal cases are heard by a bench of five judges consisting of the Chief Justice, three permanent judges and a non-permanent judge from another common law jurisdiction. If the Chief Justice does not sit in an appeal, a permanent judge is designated to sit in the Chief Justice's place, and a non-permanent judge from Hong Kong will sit on the court as well. Similarly, if a permanent judge is unable to sit, a non-permanent Hong Kong judge will sit in place of that permanent judge. Technically, should a non-permanent judge from outside Hong Kong be unable to attend due to extraordinary circumstances (such as during the COVID-19 pandemic), two non-permanent Hong Kong judges may sit on the court or, or the overseas judge may sit via video conferencing.

As the role of a non-permanent judge is not a full time role, a serving High Court judge may be appointed as a non-permanent judge concurrently, such as Vice-President Robert Tang and Vice-President Frank Stock, as they were then known. This is extended only to the most eminent and senior serving High Court justices. There is no mandatory retirement age for a non-permanent judge.

Since the enactment of the National Security Law in 2020, no foreign non-permanent judges has sat during a National Security case, being replaced instead by designated Hong Kong non-permanent judges.

Judicial Assistants

Since 2009, under the auspices of the then-Chief Justice Andrew Li, judicial assistants have been appointed to provide support and assistance to its judges.

Registrar

There is also a Registrar attached to the Court of Final Appeal, to help with review of appeal applications and other administrative duties; the Registrar is usually recruited from the District Court level. The list of Registrar's are as follows:

  1. Edward Timothy Starbuck Woolley (1997–1999)
  2. Simon Kwang Cheok-weung (2014–2018)
  3. Wong King-wah (since June 2023)

Building

From its inception in July 1997 until September 2015, the court was located in the Former French Mission Building, in Central. [4] In September 2015, the court relocated to the former (until 2011) Legislative Council Building, which was originally the colonial Supreme Court (1912–1985).

List of buildings used

Current court

The Cheung Court

The Cheung Court began on 11 January 2021 (3 years and 100 days ago), when Andrew Cheung began his tenure as the 3rd Chief Justice. Currently, 17 justices serve on the Cheung Court, including the Chief Justice, 3 Permanent Judges, and 13 non-permanent judges (9 of whom are from other common law jurisdictions).

Permanent members of the court

  • The Hon. Chief Justice Andrew Cheung (since January 2021; first appointed Permanent Judge in October 2018)
  • The Hon. Mr. Justice Roberto Ribeiro (since September 2000)
  • The Hon. Mr. Justice Joseph Fok (since October 2013)
  • The Hon. Mr. Justice Johnson Lam (since July 2021)

List of permanent judges

Chief Justices

Court of Final Appeal
Traditional Chinese 香港終審法院
Simplified Chinese 香港终审法院
No.NameChinese nameTenure startTenure endTenure lengthPrevious judicial officeInner barAppointed by
1 Andrew Li Kwok-nang, GBM
(Born 12 December 1948; age 75)
李國能1 July 199731 August 201013 years and 62 daysNone (Barrister–Queen's Counsel )
(Concurrent Deputy High Court Judge)
QC (1988) Tung Chee-hwa
2 Geoffrey Ma Tao-li, GBM
(Born 11 January 1956; age 68)
馬道立1 September 201010 January 202110 years and 132 days Chief Judge of the High Court QC (1993) Donald Tsang
3 Andrew Cheung Kui-nung, GBM
(Born 24 September 1961; age 62)
張舉能11 January 2021Incumbent3 years and 100 days Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal Carrie Lam

Permanent Judges

No.NameChinese nameReplacingTenure startTenure endTenure lengthPrevious judicial officeInner barAppointed by
1 Henry Denis Litton, CBE
(Born 7 August 1934; age 89)
烈顯倫Inaugural1 July 199713 September 2000 [lower-alpha 1] 3 years and 75 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal QC (1970) Tung Chee-hwa
2 Charles Arthur Ching, GBM
(7 October 193530 November 2000; aged 65)
沈澄Inaugural1 July 19976 October 20003 years and 98 days Justice of Appeal QC (1974)
3 Syed Kemal Shah Bokhary, GBM
(Born 25 October 1947; age 76)
包致金Inaugural1 July 199724 October 201215 years and 116 days Justice of Appeal QC (1983)
4 Patrick Chan Siu-oi, GBM
(Born 21 October 1948; age 75)
陳兆愷Litton1 September 2000 [lower-alpha 2] 20 October 201313 years and 50 days Chief Judge of the High Court
5 Roberto Alexandre Vieira Ribeiro, GBM
(Born 20 March 1949; age 75)
李義Ching1 September 2000 [lower-alpha 3] Incumbent23 years and 232 days Justice of Appeal QC (1990)
6 Robert Tang Kwok-ching, GBM, SBS
(Born 7 January 1947; age 77)
鄧國楨Bokhary25 October 201224 October 20186 years and 0 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal
(Concurrent Non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal)
QC (1986) Leung Chun-ying
7 Joseph Paul Fok
(Born 24 September 1962; age 61)
霍兆剛Chan21 October 2013Incumbent10 years and 182 days Justice of Appeal SC (1999)
8 Andrew Cheung Kui-nung, GBM
(Born 24 September 1961; age 62)
張舉能Tang25 October 201810 January 2021 [lower-alpha 4] 2 years and 78 days Chief Judge of the High Court Carrie Lam
9 Johnson Lam Man-hon
(Born August 1961; age 62)
林文瀚Cheung30 July 2021Incumbent2 years and 265 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal

List of non-permanent judges

Current non-permanent judges from Hong Kong

No.NameChinese nameTenure startTenure lengthPrevious judicial officesInner barAppointed by
1 Frank Stock, GBS
(Born 15 June 1945; age 78)
司徒敬1 September 201013 years and 232 days Deputy High Court Judge (1991)
Judge of the High Court of Justice/Court of First Instance (1992–2000)
Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal (2000–09)
Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (2009–14)
QC (1985) Donald Tsang
2 Syed Kemal Shah Bokhary, GBM
(Born 25 October 1947; age 76)
包致金25 October 201211 years and 178 days Judge of the High Court of Justice (1989–93)
Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal (1993–97)
Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal (1997–2012)
QC (1983) Leung Chun-ying
3 Patrick Chan Siu-oi, GBM
(Born 21 October 1948; age 75)
陳兆愷21 October 201310 years and 182 days Judge of the District Court (1987–91)
Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court (1991–92)
Judge of the High Court of Justice (1992–97)
Chief Judge of the High Court (1997–2000)
Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal (2000–13)
4 Robert Tang Kwok-ching, GBM, SBS
(Born 7 January 1947; age 77)
鄧國楨25 October 20185 years and 178 days Deputy District Judge (1982)
Deputy High Court Judge (1986)
Recorder of the High Court of Justice/Court of First Instance (1995–2004)
Judge of the Court of First Instance (2004–05)
Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal (2005–06)
Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (2006–12)
Non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal (2010–12)
Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal (2012–18)
QC (1986) Carrie Lam

Current non-permanent judges from other common law jurisdictions

No.JurisdictionNameChinese nameTenure startTenure lengthPrior most senior judicial roleInner barAppointed by
1 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Hoffmann, GBS賀輔明勳爵12 January 199826 years and 99 days Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (1995–2009) QC (1977) Tung Chee-hwa
2 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, GBS廖柏嘉勳爵1 March 200915 years and 50 days President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2012–17) QC (1987) Donald Tsang
3 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Collins of Mapesbury 郝廉思勳爵30 June 201112 years and 295 days Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2009–11) QC (1997)
4 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, GBS范理申勳爵1 October 201211 years and 202 days President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2009–12) QC (1978) Leung Chun-ying
5 Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia William Montague Charles Gummow 甘慕賢29 July 201310 years and 266 days Justice of the High Court of Australia (1995–2012) QC (1986)
6 Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia Robert Shenton French 范禮全31 May 20176 years and 325 days Chief Justice of Australia (2008–17)
7 Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg Canada Beverley Marian McLachlin 麥嘉琳30 July 2018 [5] 5 years and 265 days Chief Justice of Canada (2000–17) Carrie Lam
8 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Sumption 岑耀信勳爵18 December 2019 [6] 4 years and 124 days Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2012–18) QC (1986)
9 Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia Patrick Anthony Keane 祈顯義6 April 2023 [7] 1 year and 14 days Justice of the High Court of Australia (2013–2022) QC (1988) John Lee

Former non-permanent judges from Hong Kong

No.NameChinese nameTenure startTenure endTenure lengthPrior most senior local judicial roleInner barNotesAppointed by
1 Sir Denys Tudor Emil Roberts, KBE羅弼時爵士28 July 199727 July 20036 years and 0 days Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (1979–88) QC (1964)Inaugural justice Tung Chee-hwa
2 Sir Alan Armstrong Huggins 赫健士爵士28 July 199727 July 20036 years and 0 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (1980–87)Inaugural justice
3 Sir Derek Cons 康士爵士28 July 199727 July 20069 years and 0 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (1986–93)Inaugural justice
4William James Silke邵祺28 July 199727 July 200912 years and 0 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (1987–94)Inaugural justice
5Kutlu Tekin Fuad傅雅德28 July 199727 July 200912 years and 0 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (1988–93)Inaugural justice
6 Gerald Paul Nazareth, GBS黎守律28 July 199727 July 201215 years and 0 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (1994–2000) QC (1981)Inaugural justice
7 John Barry Mortimer, GBS馬天敏28 July 199727 July 201518 years and 0 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (1997–99) QC (1971)Inaugural justice
8 Sir Noel Plunkett Power, GBS鮑偉華爵士28 July 199719 November 200912 years and 115 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (1997–99)Inaugural justice; died in office
9Art Michael McMullin麥慕年28 July 199727 July 20036 years and 0 days Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal (1979–86)Inaugural justice
10Philip Gerard Clough郭樂富28 July 199727 July 20069 years and 0 days Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal (1986–92)Inaugural justice
11Neil Macdougall麥德高28 July 199727 July 20036 years and 0 days Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal (1993–95)Inaugural justice
12 Henry Denis Litton, GBM烈顯倫14 September 200013 September 201515 years and 0 days Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal (1997–2000) QC (1970)
13 Charles Arthur Ching, GBM沈澄7 October 200030 November 200055 days Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal (1997–2000) QC (1974)Died in office
14 Robert Tang Kwok-ching, GBM, SBS鄧國楨1 September 201024 October 20122 years and 54 days Vice-president of the Court of Appeal (2006–12) QC (1986)Appointed Permanent Judge Donald Tsang
15 Michael John Hartmann, GBS夏正民1 September 201031 August 20166 years and 0 days Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal (2008–12)

Former non-permanent judges from other common law jurisdictions

No.JurisdictionNameChinese nameTenure startTenure endTenure lengthPrior most senior judicial roleInner barNotesAppointed by
1 Flag of New Zealand.svg New Zealand
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom
Lord Cooke of Thorndon 顧安國勳爵28 July 199727 July 20069 years and 0 days Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (1996–2001) QC (1964)Inaugural justice Tung Chee-hwa
2 Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia Sir Anthony Frank Mason, GBM梅師賢爵士28 July 199727 July 201518 years and 0 days Chief Justice of Australia (1987–95) QC (1964)Inaugural justice
3 Flag of New Zealand.svg New Zealand Sir Edward Jonathan Somers 沈穆善爵士28 July 19973 June 20024 years and 311 days Judge of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand (1981–90) QC (1973)Inaugural justice; died in office
4 Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia Sir Daryl Michael Dawson 杜偉舜爵士1 September 199731 August 20036 years and 0 days Justice of the High Court of Australia (1982–97) QC (1971)
5 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead 李啟新勳爵12 January 199811 January 20046 years and 0 days Second Senior Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (2002–07) QC (1974)
6 Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia Sir Francis Gerard Brennan, GBS布仁立爵士28 July 200027 July 201212 years and 0 days Chief Justice of Australia (1995–98) QC (1965)
7 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Millett, GBS苗禮治勳爵28 July 200027 May 202120 years and 304 days Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (1998–2004) QC (1974)Died in office
8 Flag of New Zealand.svg New Zealand Sir Johann Thomas Eichelbaum 艾俊彬爵士28 July 200027 July 201212 years and 0 days Chief Justice of New Zealand (1989–99) QC (1978)
9 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Scott of Foscote 施廣智勳爵28 July 200327 July 20129 years and 0 days Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (2000–09) QC (1975)
10 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Woolf, GBS伍爾夫勳爵28 July 200327 July 20129 years and 0 days Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales (2000–05)
11 Flag of New Zealand.svg New Zealand Sir Ivor Lloyd Morgan Richardson 韋卓善爵士28 July 200327 July 20096 years and 0 days President of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand (1996–2002)
12 Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia Michael Hudson McHugh 馬曉義1 July 200630 June 20126 years and 0 days Justice of the High Court of Australia (1989–2005) QC (1973) Donald Tsang
13 Flag of New Zealand.svg New Zealand Sir Thomas Munro Gault, KNZM高禮哲爵士1 July 200619 May 20158 years and 323 days Justice of the Supreme Court of New Zealand (2004–06) QC (1984)Died in office
14 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, GBS華學佳勳爵1 March 200916 November 202314 years and 261 days Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2009–13) QC (1982)Died in office
15 Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia Anthony Murray Gleeson, GBS紀立信1 March 200929 February 202415 years and 0 days Chief Justice of Australia (1998–2008) QC (1974)
16 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony 簡嘉麒勳爵30 June 201129 June 20209 years and 0 days Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2009–17) QC (1979)
17 Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia James Jacob Spigelman, AC施覺民29 July 20132 September 20207 years and 36 days Chief Justice of New South Wales (1998–2011) QC (1986)Resigned mid-term [9] Leung Chun-ying
18 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Reed of Allermuir 韋彥德勳爵31 May 201730 March 20224 years and 304 days President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2020–) QC (1995)Resigned mid-term [10]
19 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Baroness Hale of Richmond 何熙怡女男爵30 July 201829 July 20213 years and 0 days President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2017–20) QC (1989)First NPJ to not renew term Carrie Lam
20 Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Lord Hodge 賀知義勳爵1 January 2021 [11] 30 March 20221 year and 89 days Deputy President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (2020–) QC (1996)Resigned mid-term [10]

Number of judges from each common law jurisdiction

Traditionally, all overseas non-permanent judges came from three common law jurisdictions: the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. In 2018, Beverly McLachlin - the former Chief Justice of Canada - became the first Canadian (and, along with Baroness Hale, one of the first two women) to be appointed to the CFA. [12]

JurisdictionCurrently servingFormerly servedTotal
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom5914
Flag of Australia (converted).svg Australia369
Flag of New Zealand.svg New Zealand055
Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg Canada101
Total92029

Controversies

While the CFA is the final appellate court in Hong Kong, and is granted power of final adjudication, the fact that the Central Government of China has the power to interpret - in essence overturn - the CFA's rulings has caused great controversy over the years. This has led the CFA to be mockingly referred to as the "Court of Semi-Final Appeal" by people such as former Hong Kong Bar Association Chairman Martin Lee KC SC, veteran activist-investor David Webb, human rights lawyer Mark Daly, as well as the general public. [13] [14] [15] [16] The term "Court of Semi-Final Appeal" was first officially referenced to by then-Secretary for Justice Elsie Leung as far back as 1999. [17] A more detailed list of controversies around the CFA are listed below.

Article 158 interpretation

The controversial power of final interpretation of "national" law including the Basic Law is vested in the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of China (NPCSC) by virtue of Article 158 of the Basic Law and by the Constitution of the PRC; however, "national" laws which are not explicitly listed in Annex III of the Basic Law are not operative in Hong Kong. Since 2020, Article 158 interpretations may also be applied to the Hong Kong national security law. [18]

Article 158 delegates such power to the courts of Hong Kong for interpretation while handling court cases. Although this arrangement has attracted criticism of "undermining judicial independence", an interpretation by the NPCSC does not affect any court judgments already rendered. This practice is highly controversial as it contradicts the power of final adjudication; the first time an interpretation occurred in 1999, all five judges (including the Chief Justice, all three permanent justices and one non-permanent justice) involved in the case of Ng Ka Ling v Director of Immigration reportedly considered quitting the top court in protest. The judges ultimately did not quit, as "the justices feared they would be replaced by less independent or competent jurists." [19]

Since 1997, there have been 6 interpretations, 5 of which interpreted the Basic Law, and 1 of which interpreted the national security law.

Basic Law interpretations

National security law interpretations

  • 2022: Granting the Chief Executive power to bar foreign lawyers (barristers and solicitors) from Hong Kong national security law cases (Jimmy Lai's hiring of Tim Owen KC); first interpretation of the Hong Kong national security law and first interpretation relating to foreign lawyers. [18]

Kemal Bokhary replacement

In 2012, Permanent Judge Kemal Bokhary - known as a leading liberal and dissenting voice on the Court - did not have his tenure extended past the mandated retirement age of 65. His replacement, however, was then-already 65-year old Robert Tang, who was even older than Bokhary but was seen as more conservative. Bokhary himself has said that he believes his tenure was not extended due to his "liberal judgments". [21]

Hong Kong National Security Law

Designated national security law judges (2020)

The introduction of designated national security law judges created two new exclusions for justices on the Court: an overseas non-permanent judge now no longer sits in on a full hearing if it is a national security law case, and not all non-permanent judges - even those from Hong Kong - are approved to sit on national security law cases. This was first evidenced in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying , where two local non-permanent judges (Stock NPJ and Chan NPJ) sat instead of the usual combination of one local NPJ, and one overseas NPJ.

As of 2024, two non-permanent justices (Bokhary NPJ and Tang NPJ) have still not sat in on any national security law cases; it is unclear whether this is because they have not been designated, or simply have not been scheduled to sit in on a national security case.

Resignation of non-permanent judges (since 2020)

No non-permanent judge from overseas jurisdictions had ever quit the Court mid-term before the enactment of the National Security Law. In September 2020, then-non-permanent judge James Spigelman resigned in response to China's controversial National Security Law being imposed on Hong Kong, but Spigelman did not elaborate further. [22] In March 2022, both Lord Reed and Lord Hodge resigned as non-permanent judges, citing the National Security Law leading to the judges being unable to "continue to sit in Hong Kong without appearing to endorse an administration which has departed from values of political freedom, and freedom of expression, to which the Justices of the Supreme Court are deeply committed." [10]

In November 2022, Lady Hale - who had refused to renew her tenure on the Court in 2020 - suggested that British judges should leave the CFA, stating, "...there's going to come a stage where [British judges] are asked to apply and enforce unacceptable laws, and some of us might think that that stage has already come." [23]

Overseas counsel for national security defendants (2023)

Within hours of the CFA allowing media tycoon Jimmy Lai to hire Tim Owen KC, chief executive John Lee announced that the Government would seek an interpretation under Article 158 to overturn the CFA's decision (as well as overturning the decisions by the Chief Judge and the Court of Appeal). This was roundly condemned by legal pundits, including Elsie Leung and Lord Pannick KC. Even before the interpretation, the Immigration Department withheld Owen's work visa, contrary to what the CFA had ruled. [24] This decision was criticized by leading barrister Lord Pannick KC, who frequently represents the Hong Kong Government in court, and also questioned by Jonathan Kaplan KC, another British King's Counsel who frequently appears in Hong Kong courts. [25] [26]

Ultimately, Owen was replaced by Marc Corlett KC, a New Zealand King's Counsel but who had gained admission to the Hong Kong bar in 2020. Corlett was widely seen as a like-for-like replacement for Owen, and showed that overseas specialist lawyers would need to be admitted to the Hong Kong bar before being allowed to participate in national security trials. [27]

Proposed United States sanctions on Hong Kong judges (2023)

The United States Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) released a report on 12 May 2023 suggesting sanctions be placed on 29 hand-picked Hong Kong national security judges (which includes the Chief Justice and 3 Permanent Judges), saying, "As participants in this system, judges appointed to handle national security cases contribute to these systemic violations." [28] This suggestion was rejected by both the Hong Kong Bar Association and the Judiciary, stressing that, "...there is no basis at all to call into question the integrity and independence of Hong Kong judges, whose selection, appointment and discharge of their constitutional role and duties are, and must remain, free from any political considerations and interference." [29] [30]

Maria Yuen nomination saga

In June 2021, Justice of Appeal Maria Yuen was recommended for appointment as a permanent judge by the Judicial Officers Recommendation Commission. However the promotion was rejected by pro-Beijing legislators, in an unprecedented breach of the norms of an independent legal system. The legislators, who by protocol accept the recommendations of the commission, claimed that she might be influenced by her husband, former Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma, whose defence of Hong Kong's judicial independence they considered unpatriotic. [31]

See also

Notes

  1. Justice Litton began pre-resignation leave on 1 August 2000.
  2. Took office before the retirement of his predecessor, Litton PJ; hence the number of active PJ's was briefly more than the usual 3.
  3. Took office before the retirement of his predecessor, Ching PJ; hence the number of active PJ's was briefly more than the usual 3.
  4. Became the 3rd Chief Justice.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong Basic Law</span> Organic law of the Hong Kong SAR

The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China is a national law of China that serves as the organic law for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). Comprising nine chapters, 160 articles and three annexes, the Basic Law was composed to implement Annex I of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration.

Andrew Li Kwok-nang is a retired Hong Kong judge, and a former Chief Justice of Hong Kong, who was the first to preside over the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, established on 1 July 1997. Li was succeeded by Geoffrey Ma on 1 September 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kemal Bokhary</span> Hong Kong judge

Syed Kemal Shah Bokhary is a judge in Hong Kong. He was one of three Permanent Judges of Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal from its inception in 1997 until he reached the mandatory retirement age of 65 in October 2012; afterwards, he remained on the bench as a non-permanent judge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Hong Kong</span> Law courts in the special administrative region of China

The Judiciary of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is the judicial branch of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Under the Basic Law of Hong Kong, it exercises the judicial power of the Region and is independent of the executive and legislative branches of the Government. The courts in Hong Kong hear and adjudicate all prosecutions and civil disputes, including all public and private law matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the United Kingdom</span> Final court of appeal in the United Kingdom

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is the final court of appeal in the United Kingdom for all civil cases, and for criminal cases originating in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. As the United Kingdom’s highest appellate court for these matters, it hears cases of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong Bar Association</span> Regulatory body for barristers in Hong Kong

The Hong Kong Bar Association (HKBA) is the professional regulatory body for barristers in Hong Kong. The Law Society of Hong Kong is the equivalent association for solicitors in Hong Kong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court (Hong Kong)</span> Superior court of record with unlimited civil and criminal jurisdiction in Hong Kong

The High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is a part of the legal system of Hong Kong. It consists of the Court of Appeal and the Court of First Instance; it deals with criminal and civil cases which have risen beyond the lower courts. It is a superior court of record of unlimited civil and criminal jurisdiction. It was named the Supreme Court before 1997. Though previously named the Supreme Court, this Court has long been the local equivalent to the Senior Courts of England and Wales and has never been vested with the power of final adjudication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Hong Kong</span> Rights enjoyed by citizens in China

Human rights protection is enshrined in the Basic Law and its Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap.383). By virtue of the Bill of Rights Ordinance and Basic Law Article 39, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is put into effect in Hong Kong. Any local legislation that is inconsistent with the Basic Law can be set aside by the courts. This does not apply to national legislation that applies to Hong Kong, such as the National Security Law, even if it is inconsistent with the Bills of Rights Ordinance, ICCPR, or the Basic Law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme court</span> Highest court in a jurisdiction

In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court, also known as a court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal, is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are binding on all other courts in a nation and are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts. A Supreme Court can also, in certain circumstances, act as a court of original jurisdiction, however, this is typically limited to constitutional law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rimsky Yuen</span> Hong Kong barrister

Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung is a barrister who served as the third Secretary for Justice of Hong Kong from 2012 to 2018.

Judicial review in Hong Kong is conducted according to the Constitutional and Administrative Law List. It comprises two different aspects: firstly, judicial review of domestic ordinances as to their compatibility with the Basic Law ; secondly, judicial review of administrative decisions under administrative law.

The Amina Bokhary controversy occurred in Hong Kong in 2010 involving the assault conviction of a wealthy woman from a well-connected family. Amina Mariam Bokhary, 32, received a sentence of probation and a one-year driving ban following an incident in the aftermath of a road traffic accident when she struck several police officers. She had committed similar offences in 2001 and 2008.

<i>Director of Immigration v Chong Fung Yuen</i>

Director of Immigration v. Chong Fung Yuen was a 2001 case in Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal. Chief Justice Andrew Li, in the Court's unanimous opinion, affirmed lower court decisions that Chinese citizens born in Hong Kong enjoyed the right of abode regardless of the Hong Kong immigration status of their parents. The case touched on issues of interpretation of the Hong Kong Basic Law, both common law interpretation by courts in Hong Kong as well as interpretation by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) of the People's Republic of China. Professor Albert Chen of the University of Hong Kong describes the case as part of a "period of elaboration and consolidation of the regime of rights in the Hong Kong SAR", lasting roughly from 2000 to 2002.

Vallejos and Domingo v. Commissioner of Registration was a court case against the government of Hong Kong by two foreign domestic helpers (FDHs) seeking permanent residence and the right of abode in Hong Kong. Because of its subject matter it was commonly referred to in the media as the FDHs' right of abode case (外傭居港權案). Evangeline Vallejos and Daniel Domingo were two of five applicants who in various groups filed three right of abode lawsuits in 2010; the ruling in Vallejos' case was expected to be a precedent for the other two.

Lau Kong Yung v. Director of Immigration was a 1999 right of abode case in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal following closely on the heels of the landmark Ng Ka Ling v. Director of Immigration decision earlier that year. After Ng and the two prior actions in Lau, but before the case came before the CFA, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) of the People's Republic of China issued an interpretation of the Basic Law which affected the rights of Lau and his fellow applicants. Lau thus became the first case in which the CFA had to take into account an NPCSC interpretation in applying the Basic Law.

Fateh Muhammad v. Commissioner of Registration and Registration of Persons Tribunal was a 2001 case in the Court of Final Appeal, Hong Kong by a Pakistani migrant seeking the right of abode in Hong Kong. The case concerned provisions of the Immigration Ordinance requiring that a non-Chinese national's seven years of "ordinary residence" qualifying him to apply for permanent residence immediately precede his application. The unanimous opinion, written by Justice Kemal Bokhary, ruled that those provisions were not inconsistent with the Hong Kong Basic Law. The ruling in the case temporarily disqualified the appellant from applying for permanent residency, though he was expected to qualify again a few years later.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Judge of the High Court of Hong Kong</span>

The Chief Judge of the High Court of Hong Kong (CJHC) is the head of the High Court of Hong Kong and the President of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong. In the Hong Kong order of precedence, the Chief Judge is the second most senior administrative judge for the courts system, second only to the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong. The position of Chief Judge is the broad equivalent of the Master of the Rolls in the courts system of England and Wales.

The Honourable Mr Justice Jeremy Poon Shiu-chor (潘兆初) is the Chief Judge of the High Court of Hong Kong and President of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong.

The Permanent Judges of the Court of Final Appeal are full-time judges sitting on Hong Kong's final appellate court, the Court of Final Appeal. They are called Permanent Judges because they are required to sit on every appeal committee and court case relating to the Court of Final Appeal, and to distinguish them from other part-time jurists who also sit on the top court, known as Non-Permanent Judges.

<i>Ng Ka Ling v Director of Immigration</i> Joint appeal of three cases

Ng Ka Ling v Director of Immigration was a joint appeal of three cases decided in 1999 by Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal (CFA). Chief Justice Andrew Li, in the Court's unanimous opinion, held that mainland-born children of Hong Kong permanent residents enjoyed the right of abode, regardless of whether one of their parents have acquired Hong Kong permanent residency at the time of birth of the children.

References

  1. "Court Services & Facilities – Court of Final Appeal". Government of Hong Kong. 9 January 2015. Archived from the original on 30 March 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015.
  2. Archived 16 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  3. Archived 4 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  4. "Finance Committee – Public Works Subcommittee (Papers) 8 Nov 95". Government of Hong Kong. Retrieved 20 June 2015.
  5. Hong Kong Gazette Notice GN5815/2018
  6. "Appointments of non-permanent judge from another common law jurisdiction of the Court of Final Appeal and the Chief Judge of the High Court".
  7. "Appointment of non-permanent judge from another common law jurisdiction of the Court of Final Appeal". Government of Hong Kong. 3 April 2023.
  8. "Appointment of non-permanent judge from another common law jurisdiction of Court of Final Appeal".
  9. "REVOCATION OF APPOINTMENT OF JUDGE FROM ANOTHER COMMON LAW JURISDICTION OF THE HONG KONG COURT OF FINAL APPEAL" (PDF).
  10. 1 2 3 "Role of UK Supreme Court judges on the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - update". 30 March 2022.
  11. "Appointment of non-permanent judge from another common law jurisdiction of the Court of Final Appeal". HK Government. 23 December 2020. Archived from the original on 23 December 2020.
  12. Chung, Kimmy (30 May 2018). "Baroness Hale and Beverly McLachlin become first female judges to join Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal despite 'national interest' concerns". SCMP.
  13. Lee, Martin (21 May 2000). "RTHK "Letter to Hong Kong"".
  14. Daly, Mark (2013). "A human rights lawyer's perspective". 9 - A human rights lawyer's perspective from Part II - The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal. Cambridge University Press. pp. 207–222. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511894763.012. ISBN   9781107011212.
  15. Webb, David (16 October 2019). "ERO: one judicial review, two judges".
  16. "Court undermined by reinterpretation". 9 March 2002.
  17. Leung, Elsie (18 May 1999). "Speech by Secretary for Justice".
  18. 1 2 Chau, Candice (8 January 2023). "Explainer: Beijing's first interpretation of Hong Kong's national security law". Hong Kong Free Press.
  19. "All city's top judges 'considered quitting'". SCMP. 8 September 2011.
  20. "The decision by the Court of Final Appeal to seek an interpretation of the Basic Law from the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress regarding the controversy of state immunity raised in the debt litigation of the Democratic Republic of Congo" (PDF). LegCo.
  21. Ng, Kang Chung (5 November 2012). "Former judge Bokhary: 'I was ousted for being too liberal'". SCMP. Archived from the original on 30 October 2016.
  22. "Australian judge quits Hong Kong court, citing national security law". Reuters. 18 September 2020. Archived from the original on 18 September 2020.
  23. "Lady Hale suggests 'time has come' for British judges to leave Hong Kong court". Scottish Legal News. 17 November 2022.
  24. "Media tycoon Jimmy Lai's trial adjourned to Dec 13, Hong Kong Immigration withholds visa extension for his lawyer". HKFP. 1 December 2022.
  25. Pannick, David (5 December 2022). "Hong Kong media trial is crunch time for its rule of law". The Times.
  26. "修例通過 外狀打國安案須特首批 或涉複雜案件審批不設時限 有議員促說明準則制衡權力". Ming Pao. 11 May 2023.
  27. "Hong Kong tycoon Jimmy Lai's legal team joined by 'specialist' New Zealand lawyer seen as replacement for barred Briton Timothy Owen". SCMP. 20 December 2023.
  28. Pang, Jessie (12 May 2023). "China condemns U.S. report calling for sanctions against Hong Kong security judges". Reuters.
  29. "Statement of the Hong Kong Bar Association Response to the US Congressional-Executive Commission Staff Research Report May 2023 calling for sanctions on Hong Kong Judges" (PDF). HKBA. 12 May 2023.
  30. "Judiciary responds to media enquiries". 12 May 2023.
  31. Hong Kong pro-Beijing legislators intervene in judicial appointment, Financial Times, by Primrose Riordan, 23 June 2021