Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021

Last updated

Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021
Act of Parliament
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Variant 1, 2022).svg
Parliament of the United Kingdom
Long title An Act to make provision for, and in connection with, the authorisation of criminal conduct in the course of, or otherwise in connection with, the conduct of covert human intelligence sources. [1]
Citation 2021 c. 4
Introduced by Priti Patel, Secretary of State for the Home Department (Commons)
Susan Williams, Baroness Williams of Trafford, Minister of State for Home Affairs (Lords)
Territorial extent 
[2]
Dates
Royal assent 1 March 2021 [1]
Commencement
Other legislation
Amends
Status: Current legislation
History of passage through Parliament
Text of statute as originally enacted
Revised text of statute as amended

The Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021 (c. 4) is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The act makes provision for the use of undercover law enforcement agents and covert sources and the committing of crimes in the undertaking of their duty. [4] [5] It was also referred to as the "Spy Cops Bill" – a reference to the UK undercover policing relationships scandal. [6]

Contents

Background

The government stated that the act was drafted in response to a court ruling in December 2019 which permitted, in a marginal decision, MI5 and other agencies to commit crimes in order to prevent more serious crimes from occurring. [7]

As a bill, the act was opposed by a number of political organisations and NGOs, including the international human rights advocacy organisation Amnesty International, the Green Party, Scottish National Party, Sinn Féin, and some Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs. [8] [9] In a statement, Amnesty International said: [10]

It's hugely worrying that we’re a step closer to seeing this deeply dangerous bill become law. MPs are signing off on a licence for government agencies to authorise torture and murder.

Giving such disturbing powers to bodies including MI5 and the police could have devastating impacts.

We are now urging peers who care about the rule of law to introduce urgent amendments before the bill progresses further through Parliament.

The Guardian ran an editorial against the bill, saying it was "unfit for purpose". [11] The Morning Star also ran an editorial against the Bill, noting that "even the equivalent legislation in the United States rules out torture and murder, yet nothing is ruled out in this Bill." [12] Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, who served as director of public prosecutions from 2003 to 2008, called for explicit limits on the crimes covered by the Bill. [13] Reprieve's director Maya Foa said that although "our intelligence agencies do a vital job in keeping the country safe, ... there must be common sense limits to their agents' activities". [14] Privacy International director and legal office Ilia Siatitsa added that "the public has a right to know what type of criminal acts MI5's policy authorises in the UK. That's why we're fighting them in court. The new Bill does not alleviate these concerns." [14]

The general secretaries of 14 trade unions and a number of campaign groups, including Reprieve, the Pat Finucane Centre, the Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign, Hillsborough Justice Campaign, and Justice 4 Grenfell, released a joint statement in October 2020 expressing their concerns over the bill. [15]

Provisions

The provisions of the act include:

Passage through Parliament

Rather than opposing the government, the Labour Party ordered its MPs to abstain on the vote. Labour's Shadow Security Minister Conor McGinn said that the Bill "addresses a vital issue" of "provid[ing] a clear lawful framework for the use of human intelligence sources", however also highlighted Labour's concerns of potential of the powers in the Bill to be misused. [24] However, the Socialist Campaign Group of MPs rebelled and voted against the Bill on its second reading. [25] The Bill passed a vote on its second reading in the House of Commons on 5 October 2020 by 182 votes to 20. [26] Of the 20 votes against the bill, 17 were Labour MPs, 2 were Plaid Cymru MPs and one was SDLP MP Colum Eastwood. [26]

On the third reading of the bill, on 15 October 2020, 34 Labour MPs rebelled against the order to abstain, including Shadow Ministers Dan Carden and Margaret Greenwood, [27] as well as five parliamentary private secretaries, who all resigned from their frontbench roles. [28] An amendment to prevent authorisation of serious offences was tabled by Labour leader Keir Starmer, but was defeated by 317 votes to 256. [29] The Bill's third reading passed by 313 votes to 98. [28]

When the Bill reached the House of Lords in January 2021, peers defeated the government in passing two amendments to curtail use of children, and to stop informants participating in the most serious crimes such as murder, torture, and rape. [30] A third amendment by Shami Chakrabarti seeking to prevent immunity for undercover agents was defeated after the Labour leadership chose to abstain. [31] The government argued in response that once a particular crime is explicitly outside the limit of the act, then that crime will be used as a way to "unmask infiltrators" in criminal organisations. [31] Shami Chakrabarti, a member of the House of Lords and the former director of Liberty, pointed out that as under UK law prosecution must be in the public interest, a prosecutor wouldn't charge an agent who was breaking the law in the course of their duty. [32]

Upon the return of the bill to the Commons, the amendments preventing the use of minors and vulnerable people and the participation in serious crimes were defeated in a 363 to 267 vote. [33] An amendment tabled by the Labour frontbench was not put to a vote. [34]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 Harm here means both physical injury and psychological distress.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, regulating the powers of public bodies to carry out surveillance and investigation, and covering the interception of communications. It was introduced by the Tony Blair Labour government ostensibly to take account of technological change such as the growth of the Internet and strong encryption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MI5</span> British domestic intelligence agency

The Security Service, also known as MI5, is the United Kingdom's domestic counter-intelligence and security agency and is part of its intelligence machinery alongside the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), and Defence Intelligence (DI). MI5 is directed by the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC), and the service is bound by the Security Service Act 1989. The service is directed to protect British parliamentary democracy and economic interests and to counter terrorism and espionage within the United Kingdom (UK).

The Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament (ISC) is a statutory joint committee of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, appointed to oversee the work of the UK intelligence community.

A covert operation or undercover operation is a military or police operation involving a covert agent or troops acting under an assumed cover to conceal the identity of the party responsible. Some of the covert operations are also clandestine operations which are performed in secret and meant to stay secret, though many are not.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Computer Misuse Act 1990</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Computer Misuse Act 1990 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, introduced partly in response to the decision in R v Gold & Schifreen (1988) 1 AC 1063. Critics of the bill complained that it was introduced hastily, was poorly thought out, and that intention was often difficult to prove, with the bill inadequately differentiating "joyriding" hackers like Gold and Schifreen from serious computer criminals. The Act has nonetheless become a model from which several other countries, including Canada and the Republic of Ireland, have drawn inspiration when subsequently drafting their own information security laws, as it is seen "as a robust and flexible piece of legislation in terms of dealing with cybercrime". Several amendments have been passed to keep the Act up to date.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intelligence Services Act 1994</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Intelligence Services Act 1994 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Essex Police</span> English territorial police force

Essex Police is a territorial police force responsible for policing the county of Essex, in the East of England. Essex Police is responsible for a population of over 1.8 million people and an area of 1,420 square miles (3,700 km2).

CONTEST is the United Kingdom's counter-terrorism strategy, first developed by Sir David Omand and the Home Office in early 2003 as the immediate response to 9/11, and a revised version was made public in 2006. Further revisions were published on 24 March 2009, 11 July 2011 and June 2018. An Annual Report on the implementation of CONTEST was released in March 2010 and in April 2014. The aim of the strategy is "to reduce the risk to the UK and its interests overseas from terrorism so that people can go about their lives freely and with confidence." The success of this strategy is not linked to total elimination of the terrorist threat, but to reducing the threat sufficiently to allow the citizens a normal life free from fear.

The powers of the police in England and Wales are defined largely by statute law, with the main sources of power being the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and the Police Act 1996. This article covers the powers of police officers of territorial police forces only, but a police officer in one of the UK's special police forces can utilise extended jurisdiction powers outside of their normal jurisdiction in certain defined situations as set out in statute. In law, police powers are given to constables. All police officers in England and Wales are "constables" in law whatever their rank. Certain police powers are also available to a limited extent to police community support officers and other non warranted positions such as police civilian investigators or designated detention officers employed by some police forces even though they are not constables.

The Intelligence Services Commissioner, was a regulatory official in the United Kingdom appointed under Section 59 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. They are tasked with reviewing actions and warrants taken by the Secretary of State under the Intelligence Services Act 1994 and the activities of British intelligence only in regard to the use of surveillance, covert human intelligence sources and interception of communications by MI5, MI6, and GCHQ assuming such actions and activities are not being reviewed by the Interception of Communications Commissioner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Investigatory Powers Tribunal</span> State surveillance tribunal in the United Kingdom

The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) is a first-instance tribunal and superior court of record in the United Kingdom. It is primarily an inquisitorial court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass surveillance in the United Kingdom</span> Overview of mass surveillance in the United Kingdom

The use of electronic surveillance by the United Kingdom grew from the development of signal intelligence and pioneering code breaking during World War II. In the post-war period, the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) was formed and participated in programmes such as the Five Eyes collaboration of English-speaking nations. This focused on intercepting electronic communications, with substantial increases in surveillance capabilities over time. A series of media reports in 2013 revealed bulk collection and surveillance capabilities, including collection and sharing collaborations between GCHQ and the United States' National Security Agency. These were commonly described by the media and civil liberties groups as mass surveillance. Similar capabilities exist in other countries, including western European countries.

The Government of the United Kingdom maintains several intelligence agencies that deal with secret intelligence. These agencies are responsible for collecting, analysing and exploiting foreign and domestic intelligence, providing military intelligence, and performing espionage and counter-espionage. Their intelligence assessments contribute to the conduct of the foreign relations of the United Kingdom, maintaining the national security of the United Kingdom, military planning, public safety, and law enforcement in the United Kingdom. The four main agencies are the Secret Intelligence Service, the Security Service (MI5), the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and Defence Intelligence (DI). The agencies are organised under three government departments, the Foreign Office, the Home Office and the Ministry of Defence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Margaret Greenwood</span> British politician

Margaret Greenwood is a British politician who has served as the Member of Parliament (MP) for Wirral West since 2015. She is a member of the Labour Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Investigatory Powers Act 2016</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which received royal assent on 29 November 2016. Its different parts came into force on various dates from 30 December 2016. The Act comprehensively sets out and in limited respects expands the electronic surveillance powers of the British intelligence agencies and police. It also claims to improve the safeguards on the exercise of those powers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Anderson, Baron Anderson of Ipswich</span> British barrister and life peer (born 1961)

David William Kinloch Anderson, Baron Anderson of Ipswich, is a British barrister and life peer, who was the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation in the United Kingdom between 2011 and 2017. On 8 June 2018 it was announced that he would be introduced to the House of Lords as a cross-bench (non-party) working peer. On the same day he was appointed a Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire (KBE), for services to national security and civil liberties, in the Queen's 2018 Birthday Honours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dan Carden</span> British Labour politician

Daniel Joseph Carden is a British Labour Party politician serving as the Member of Parliament (MP) for Liverpool Walton since 2017. He was reelected in 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kim Johnson (politician)</span> British Labour politician

Kim Marie Johnson is a British Labour Party politician. She has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for Liverpool Riverside since the 2019 general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rachel Hopkins</span> British Labour politician, MP for Luton South

Rachel Louise Hopkins is a British politician who has served as Member of Parliament (MP) for Luton South since 2019. A member of the Labour Party, she was a Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office from 2021 to 2023.

The powers of the prime minister of the United Kingdom come from several sources of the UK constitution, including both statute and constitutional convention, but not one single authoritative document. They have been described as "...problematic to outline definitively."

References

  1. 1 2 "Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  2. ↑ "10 - Extent and short title". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  3. ↑ "9 - Commencement and transitional provision". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  4. ↑ Home Office (11 January 2021). "Covert Human Intelligence Sources Bill Factsheet (accessible version)". GOV.UK . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  5. ↑ Marc D'Arcy (5 February 2021). "The week ahead in Parliament". BBC . Retrieved 3 March 2021.
  6. ↑ Francesca Newton (5 October 2020). "Labour Must Vote Against the Spy Cops Bill". Tribune . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  7. ↑ Bowcott, Oliver (20 December 2019). "MI5 policy allowing informants to commit serious crimes ruled lawful". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 October 2020.
  8. ↑ Jones, Jenny. "We pay police to uphold the law, not break it". Green World. Green Party . Retrieved 19 October 2020.
  9. ↑ "Undercover police and MI5 agents to be permitted to commit crimes". Scottish Legal News. 25 September 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  10. ↑ Allen, Kate (15 October 2020). "UK: MPs vote through 'deeply dangerous' Covert Human Intelligence Sources Bill" (Press release). London: Amnesty International UK. Archived from the original on 22 October 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  11. ↑ "The Guardian view on covert human intelligence sources: draw a line". The Guardian . London. 11 October 2020. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
  12. ↑ "Editorial: The Covert Intelligence Sources Bill is an authoritarian power-grab". Morning Star. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  13. ↑ Hamilton, Fiona (5 October 2020). "Call to rein in law that lets MI5 informants commit crimes". The Times. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  14. 1 2 Cowburn, Ashley (24 September 2020). "Boris Johnson to unveil legal protections for intelligence agents committing crimes while undercover". The Independent. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  15. ↑ "Unions, MPs and campaigners release joint statement on CHIS 'spycops' bill". Labour List. 13 October 2020.
  16. ↑ "1 – Authorisation of criminal conduct". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  17. ↑ "2 – Criminal conduct authorisations: safeguards for juveniles". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  18. ↑ "3 - Criminal conduct authorisations: safeguards for vulnerable adults". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  19. ↑ "4 - Authorities to be capable of authorising criminal conduct". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  20. ↑ "5 – Criminal injuries compensation". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  21. ↑ "6 – Notification to a Judicial Commissioner". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  22. ↑ "7 – Oversight by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  23. ↑ "Part 2 – Other Enactments". Legislation.gov.uk . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  24. ↑ McGinn, Conor (14 October 2020). "Voting down the CHIS bill would weaken national security and human rights". LabourList. Retrieved 30 October 2020.
  25. ↑ Waugh, Paul (5 October 2020). "Has Keir Starmer's 'Strong On Security' Stance Found Its Limits On The Covert Sources Bill?". Huffington Post. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  26. 1 2 "Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill". Hansard. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  27. ↑ Dan Lomas (3 February 2021). "The idea that the UK's intelligence agencies have an anti-Labour bias runs deep – but it is false". London School of Economics . Retrieved 3 March 2021.
  28. 1 2 Heffer, Greg (16 October 2020). "Sir Keir Starmer hit by series of Labour resignations over Covert Human Intelligence Sources Bill". Sky News. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
  29. ↑ Lizzie Dearden (15 October 2020). "MPs vote against attempt to ban undercover agents from committing murder, torture and rape". The Independent . Retrieved 3 March 2021.
  30. ↑ Lizzie Dearden (13 January 2021). "Peers vote to ban spies from committing murder, rape and torture under new law". The Independent . Retrieved 3 March 2021.
  31. 1 2 Sabbagh, Dan (13 January 2021). "Lords inflict two defeats on government over 'spy cops' bill". The Guardian.
  32. ↑ Shami Chakrabarti (14 October 2020). "The 'Spycops' bill undermines the rule of law and gives a green light to serious crimes". The Guardian . Retrieved 2 March 2021.
  33. ↑ Conrad Duncan (28 January 2021). "Government reverses attempt to explicitly ban spies from committing murder, torture or rape". The Independent . Retrieved 3 March 2021.
  34. ↑ "Supplement to the Votes and Proceedings - Wednesday 27 January 2021 - PROCEEDINGS ON CONSIDERATION OF LORDS AMENDMENTS - Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill" (PDF). Parliament.uk . 27 January 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2021.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.