Criminal transmission of HIV in the United States

Last updated

The criminal transmission of HIV in the United States varies among jurisdictions. More than thirty of the fifty U.S. states have prosecuted HIV-positive individuals for exposing another person to HIV. State laws criminalize different behaviors and assign different penalties. While pinpointing who infected whom is scientifically impossible, a person diagnosed with HIV who is accused of infecting another while engaging in sexual intercourse is, in many jurisdictions, automatically committing a crime. A person donating HIV-infected organs, tissues, and blood can be prosecuted for transmitting the virus. Spitting or transmitting HIV-infected bodily fluids is a criminal offense in some states, particularly if the target is a prison guard. Some states treat the transmission of HIV, depending upon a variety of factors, as a felony and others as a misdemeanor.

Contents

Criminal statutes were intended to reduce HIV transmission by encouraging safe sex practices, increased HIV testing, and disclosure of HIV status. The Ryan White CARE Act passed in 1990 had a significant influence on these laws, as states were required to have criminal regulations on HIV transmission to be eligible to receive federal funds for HIV-related health programs. Unfortunately, these laws did not appear to have the intended effect. In October 2012, the HIV Medicine Association (HIVMA) of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) called for the repeal of statutes that criminalize HIV-related behavior, writing: "Policies and laws that create HIV-specific crimes or that impose penalties for persons who are HIV-infected are unjust and harmful to public health around the world." It argued that such laws contribute to stigmatization and discrimination that inhibit diagnosis and result in "harsh sentencing for behaviors that pose little to no risk of HIV transmission." It advised that "All state and federal policies, laws and regulations ... be based on scientifically accurate information regarding HIV transmission routes and risk." [1]

In 2017 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stated that those who are on HIV medication and have undetectable viral loads can no longer transmit the virus while their viral load is undetectable, but the possibility for a person to not use a prescription and continue to infect others remains. [2] [3] [4] They did not specify how long after an undetectable viral load test a person can guarantee that they are still undetectable, as viral loads can rise very quickly.

Federal law and policy

National HIV/AIDS strategy

In July 2010, the White House announced a major change in its HIV/AIDS policy; the "National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States" stated that "the continued existence and enforcement of these types of laws [that criminalize HIV infection] run counter to scientific evidence about routes of HIV transmission and may undermine the public health goals of promoting HIV screening and treatment." [5] The administration's strategy cited a 2008 paper by Scott Burris and Edwin Cameron, a South African judge: "The use of criminal law to address HIV infection is inappropriate except in rare cases in which a person acts with conscious intent to transmit HIV and does so." [6]

In September 2010, the Center for HIV Law and Policy launched the Positive Justice Project, a campaign to combat HIV-related stigma and discrimination against people with HIV by the US criminal justice system. [7] In November the Project released a 293-page manual detailing HIV-specific laws and prosecutions in the 50 states, District of Columbia, U.S. Territories, Federal government, and the U.S. military. [8]

On March 15, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) along with the Centers for Disease Control published a study of HIV-specific state laws called "Prevalence and Public Health Implications of State Laws that Criminalize Potential HIV Exposure in the United States". [9]

On July 15, 2014, the DOJ released a paper called "Best Practices Guide to Reform HIV-Specific Criminal Laws to Align with Scientifically-Supported Factors", designed to guide states in updating their statutes to "reflect contemporary understanding of HIV transmission routes and associated benefits of treatment" and to establish policies that "do not place unnecessary burdens on individuals living with HIV/AIDS". [10]

Proposed federal legislation

REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act was the abbreviated name of the 'Repeal Existing Policies that Encourage and Allow Legal HIV Discrimination Act' (H.R. 3053), also called the REPEAL Act, proposed legislation that was introduced in the U.S. Congress on September 23, 2011, by Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA). [11] It called for review of all federal and state laws, policies, and regulations regarding the criminal prosecution of individuals for HIV-related offenses. It was the first piece of federal legislation to address HIV criminalization and provided incentives for states to reconsider laws and practices that target people with HIV for consensual sexual activity and conduct that poses no risk of HIV transmission. [12] The bill had 41 cosponsors and was referred in September/October 2011 to three subcommittees, where it died. [11]

Barbara Lee re-introduced the REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act 2013 as H.R. 1843 in May 2013 with 42 cosponsors, and it again died in three subcommittees. [13] Senator Chris Coons introduced the legislation as S.1790 on December 10, 2013, and it did not make it out of the Judiciary Committee. [14]

Immigration

In 2012, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) used the conviction of Jose Luis Ramirez, an HIV-positive immigrant, of solicitation for oral sex as an argument for his deportation, calling it a "particularly serious crime". An immigration judge ordered his deportation, but the DHS withdrew its argument and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed the deportation order on May 31, 2013. [15]

State law and policy

Statutes

As of 2019, at least 29 states criminalize "nondisclosure, exposure or transmission" of HIV, [16] while an additional 5 states use this to justify enhancements for sentences for other crimes. [17] As of 2008, 33 states had laws regarding the criminalization of HIV transmission. [18]

The following states may currently have laws that prosecute individuals for criminal exposure of HIV: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, [19] Idaho, Illinois, [20] Indiana, [21] [22] Iowa, [23] Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, [24] Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, [25] Montana, [26] Nevada, New Jersey, New York, [27] North Carolina, [28] North Dakota, Ohio, [29] Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. [28] [30]

Minnesota has a statute that criminalizes the transmission of certain communicable diseases including HIV. Under that statute, Daniel James Rick, despite having informed his sexual partner of his HIV status, was charged with attempted first-degree assault with great bodily harm. His conviction in the trial court was overturned on appeal, and the Supreme Court of Minnesota on August 21, 2013, agreed that the prosecutor had misapplied the statute's provision meant to address the transmission of a communicable disease in non-sexual contexts, such as sperm or organ donations. [31] [32]

Iowa Code 709c was one of the most severe criminal transmission of HIV laws in the country until its repeal 1 May 2014. For 16 years it allowed anyone with HIV exposing another person without disclosing his or her positive status, whether infection occurred or not, to be convicted of a class B felony, i.e. up to 25 years in prison and mandated registration as a sex offender. [33] It has been called "draconian". [34] According to the Iowa Department of Public Health, Iowa ranked second in prosecutions behind Tennessee of persons with HIV, despite having a relatively small number of persons living with HIV/AIDS. [35] Efforts to modernize had been underway since at least 2009, led by Community HIV/Hepatitis Advocates of Iowa Network (CHAIN) and 12 other Iowa medical professional, public health, civil rights and stakeholder organizations. Senate File 2297 redefined crimes for transmission of HIV, as well as hepatitis, tuberculosis and meningococcal disease and introduced a tiered-system of sentencing: Intentional transmission remains a class B felony, but if there is intent and no transmission it is a class D felony. Exposing an individual due to reckless disregard without intent to transmit is also a class D felony. It also includes defense in court, if following a treatment regimen and physician’s advice, and no longer requires sex offender registration. On 27 February 2014, SF2297 passed the Iowa Senate by a 48-0 margin [36] attracting national media attention. [37] The House Judiciary passed an amended version on March 13, 2014 reintroducing "too much of the existing law". [34] Senate File 2297 remained on the House’s list of unfinished business and was passed after going virtually unmentioned just in time before the legislature's adjournment in the early hours of 1 May 2014. Its passage repealed 709C and codified its replacement 709D. [36] [38]

There are also a variety of state laws regarding perinatal HIV testing of the mother and/or newborn during and following birth. [39]

Prosecutions

Prosecutions have included:

The Center for HIV Law and Policy has documented 168 cases of prosecution between January 2008 and June 2013. [52]

See also

Related Research Articles

HIV-positive people, seropositive people or people who live with HIV are people infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a retrovirus which if untreated may progress to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

Criminal transmission of HIV is the intentional or reckless infection of a person with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This is often conflated, in laws and in discussion, with criminal exposure to HIV, which does not require the transmission of the virus and often, as in the cases of spitting and biting, does not include a realistic means of transmission. Some countries or jurisdictions, including some areas of the U.S., have enacted laws expressly to criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, charging those accused with criminal transmission of HIV. Other countries charge the accused under existing laws with such crimes as murder, manslaughter, attempted murder, assault or fraud.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bugchasing</span> Seeking HIV infection through sex

Bugchasing is the particularly rare practice of intentionally seeking human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection through sexual activity.

Johnson Aziga is a Ugandan-born Canadian man formerly residing in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, notable as the first person to be charged and convicted of first-degree murder in Canada for spreading HIV, after two women whom he had infected without their knowledge died.

<i>R v Cuerrier</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

R v Cuerrier was a 1998 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada, which ruled that knowingly exposing a sexual partner to HIV constitutes a prosecutable crime under Canadian law.

The precise definitions of and punishments for aggravated sexual assault and aggravated rape vary by country and by legislature within a country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Jamaica</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Jamaica face legal and social issues not experienced by non-LGBT people. Consensual sexual intercourse between same-sex partners is legally punishable by imprisonment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HIV/AIDS</span> Spectrum of conditions caused by HIV infection

HIV is a retrovirus that attacks the immune system. It can be managed with treatment. Without treatment it can lead to a spectrum of conditions including AIDS.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HIV/AIDS in Taiwan</span> Overview of (typically) sexually transmitted disease in Taiwan

Taiwan's epidemic of HIV/AIDS began with the first case reported in December 1984. On 17 December 1990 the government promulgated the AIDS Prevention and Control Act. On 11 July 2007, the AIDS Prevention and Control Act was renamed the HIV Infection Control and Patient Rights Protection Act.

HIV exceptionalism is the term given to the trend to treat HIV/AIDS in law and policy differently from other diseases, including other sexually transmitted, infectious, lethal diseases. The term first appeared in print in an article in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1991.

Edgard Monge is a native of Nicaragua who is serving a ten-year sentence in Kingston Penitentiary, Ontario, Canada, for four counts of aggravated assault after he knowingly had unprotected sex while HIV infected and failed to inform his four sexual partners. Two of his partners also became infected with HIV. One of the two had a child from the union with Monge and the child also contracted HIV.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HIV/AIDS in Rwanda</span>

Rwanda faces a generalized epidemic, with an HIV prevalence rate of 3.1 percent among adults ages 15 to 49. The prevalence rate has remained relatively stable, with an overall decline since the late 1990s, partly due to improved HIV surveillance methodology. In general, HIV prevalence is higher in urban areas than in rural areas, and women are at higher risk of HIV infection than men. Young women ages 15 to 24 are twice as likely to be infected with HIV as young men in the same age group. Populations at higher risk of HIV infection include people in prostitution and men attending clinics for sexually transmitted infections.

UNAIDS has said that HIV/AIDS in Indonesia is one of Asia's fastest growing epidemics. In 2010, it is expected that 5 million Indonesians will have HIV/AIDS. In 2007, Indonesia was ranked 99th in the world by prevalence rate, but because of low understanding of the symptoms of the disease and high social stigma attached to it, only 5-10% of HIV/AIDS sufferers actually get diagnosed and treated. According to the a census conducted in 2019, it is counted that 640,443 people in the country are living with HIV. The adult prevalence for HIV/ AIDS in the country is 0.4%. Indonesia is the country in Southeast Asia to have the most number of recorded people living with HIV while Thailand has the highest adult prevalence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in New Jersey</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in New Jersey have the same legal rights as non-LGBT people. LGBT persons in New Jersey enjoy strong protections from discrimination, and have had the right to marry since October 21, 2013.

Discrimination against people with HIV/AIDS or serophobia is the prejudice, fear, rejection, and stigmatization of people with HIV/AIDS. Marginalized, at-risk groups such as members of the LGBTQ+ community, intravenous drug users, and sex workers are most vulnerable to facing HIV/AIDS discrimination. The consequences of societal stigma against PLHIV are quite severe, as HIV/AIDS discrimination actively hinders access to HIV/AIDS screening and care around the world. Moreover, these negative stigmas become used against members of the LGBTQ+ community in the form of stereotypes held by physicians.

HIV prevention refers to practices that aim to prevent the spread of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HIV prevention practices may be undertaken by individuals to protect their own health and the health of those in their community, or may be instituted by governments and community-based organizations as public health policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Virginia</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the Commonwealth of Virginia enjoy the same rights as non-LGBT persons. LGBT rights in the state are a recent occurrence with most improvements in LGBT rights occurring in the 2000s and 2010s. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Virginia since October 6, 2014, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal in the case of Bostic v. Rainey. Effective July 1, 2020, there is a state-wide law protecting LGBT persons from discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, and credit. The state's hate crime laws also now explicitly include both sexual orientation and gender identity.

The Center for HIV Law and Policy (CHLP) is a national legal and policy resource and strategy center in the United States working to reduce the impact of HIV on vulnerable and marginalized communities and to secure the human rights of people affected by HIV. CHLP's founder and executive director is Catherine Hanssens.

The first case of HIV in a woman was recorded in 1981. Since then, numerous women have been infected with the HIV/AIDS virus. The majority of HIV/AIDS cases in women are directly influenced by high-risk sexual activities, injectional drug use, the spread of medical misinformation, and the lack of adequate reproductive health resources in the United States. Women of color, LGBTQ women, homeless women, women in the sex trade, and women intravenous drug users are at a high-risk for contracting the HIV/AIDS virus. In an article published by the Annual Review of Sociology, Celeste Watkins Hayes, an American sociologist, scholar, and professor wrote, "Women are more likely to be forced into survival-focused behaviors such as transactional sex for money, housing, protection, employment, and other basic needs; power-imbalanced relationships with older men; and other partnerings in which they cannot dictate the terms of condom use, monogamy, or HIV." The largest motivator to become part of the sex trade was addiction, the second largest being basic needs, and the third was to support their children/family.

The Swiss Statement, or the Swiss Consensus Statement, was an announcement published in January 2008 by the Swiss Federal Commission for AIDS/HIV outlining the conditions under which an HIV-positive individual could be considered functionally noncontagious—namely, adherence to antiretroviral therapy, a sufficiently low viral load, and a lack of any other sexually transmitted diseases. While lacking the backing of complete, fully randomized clinical studies, the Commission felt the contemporary evidence for non-contagiousness for people on antiretroviral treatment was nonetheless strong enough to warrant official publication.

References

  1. ↑ "HIVMA Urges Repeal of HIV-specific Criminal Statutes" (PDF). HIV Medicine Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 26, 2014. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  2. ↑ "HIV Treatment as Prevention - HIV Risk and Prevention - HIV/AIDS - CDC". www.cdc.gov. 10 September 2018. Retrieved 18 October 2018.
  3. ↑ "Those with undetectable HIV at "effectively no risk" of transmitting virus, CDC says". NBC News . Retrieved 18 October 2018.
  4. ↑ "HIV drugs now so effective people on them cannot transmit virus". Independent.co.uk . 2017-10-09. Retrieved 18 October 2018.
  5. ↑ "National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States" (PDF). The White House Office of National AIDS Policy. July 2010. p. 35. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  6. ↑ Scott Burris and Edwin Cameron, "The case against criminalization of HIV transmission", JAMA (2008). Retrieved December 6, 2012
  7. ↑ Heywood, Todd A. (September 28, 2010). "New group seeks end to HIV-specific criminal laws". The Iowa Independent. Archived from the original on August 9, 2014. Retrieved July 22, 2014.
  8. ↑ René Bennett-Carlson (Fall 2010). "Ending and Defending Against HIV Criminalization: State and Federal Laws and Prosecutions, Vol.1, First Edition". The Resource Bank. Center for HIV Law and Policy. Archived from the original on August 27, 2011. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  9. ↑ "Prevalence and Public Health Implications of State Laws that Criminalize Potential HIV Exposure in the United States", AIDS and Behavior, June 2014, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 997-1006., accessed July 21, 2014
  10. ↑ U.S. Department of Justice: "Justice Department Releases Best Practices Guide to Reform HIV-Specific Criminal Laws to Align with Scientifically-Supported Factors", July 15, 2014, accessed July 21, 2014
  11. 1 2 H.R.3053 - REPEAL Act, retrieved December 6, 2012
  12. ↑ "Why Federal Legislation Matters: The REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act, 26 September 2011". Center for HIV Law and Policy. Archived from the original on 25 April 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  13. ↑ Lee, Barbara (7 May 2013). "H.R.1843 - REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act of 2013". Congress.gov. Library of Congress. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
  14. ↑ Roberts, Dan (December 10, 2013). "New bill seeks to repeal outdated state HIV discrimination laws". The Guardian. Retrieved December 12, 2013.
  15. ↑ "Immigration Court rules in favor of HIV-positive man facing deportation". San Diego Gay & Lesbian News. June 5, 2013. Retrieved June 5, 2013.
  16. ↑ Beyrer, Chris; Suttle, Robert (2019-08-26). "Opinion | Living With H.I.V. Isn't a Crime. Why Is the United States Treating It Like One?". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2019-08-26.
  17. ↑ "HIV Criminalization in the United States (PDF infographic)" (PDF). The Center for HIV Law and Policy. 1 March 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 July 2019. Retrieved 26 August 2019.
  18. ↑ "Criminal statutes on HIV transmission" (pdf 123.67 KB). Lesbian and Gay Rights Project. ACLU. June 4, 2008. p. 13.
  19. ↑ "§ 16-5-60 - Reckless conduct causing harm to or endangering the bodily safety of another; conduct by HIV infected persons; assault by HIV infected persons or hepatitis infected persons :: 2010 Georgia Code :: US Codes and Statutes :: US Law :: Justia". law.justia.com/. Retrieved May 24, 2015.
  20. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-07-18. Retrieved 2012-12-06.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  21. ↑ "Indiana Code 35-42-1". In.gov. July 1, 1989. Retrieved October 17, 2011.
  22. ↑ "Indiana Code 35-42-2". In.gov. Retrieved October 17, 2011.
  23. ↑ "Iowa Code 2003SUPPLEMENT: Section 709C.1". Archived from the original on May 6, 2010. Retrieved July 18, 2010.
  24. ↑ "Michigan Legislature – Section 333.5210". Legislature.mi.gov. March 30, 1989. Retrieved October 17, 2011.
  25. ↑ "Section 191-677 Prohibited acts, criminal penalties". Moga.mo.gov. August 28, 2010. Archived from the original on November 18, 2011. Retrieved October 17, 2011.
  26. ↑ "50-18-112. Infected person not to expose another to sexually transmitted disease". Data.opi.mt.gov. Archived from the original on October 3, 2011. Retrieved October 17, 2011.
  27. ↑ Richardson, Lynda (September 25, 1998). "Wave of Laws Aimed at People With H.I.V". The New York Times.
  28. 1 2 "Criminal Statutes on HIV Transmission, 2008". Statehealthfacts.org. Archived from the original on May 26, 2010. Retrieved July 18, 2010.
  29. ↑ "Lawriter – ORC – 2927.13 Selling or donating contaminated blood". Codes.ohio.gov. Retrieved October 17, 2011.
  30. ↑ "Criminal Transmission of HIV". Avert.org. Retrieved July 18, 2010.
  31. ↑ "Appeals Court Reverses Conviction In HIV Case". CBS Minnesota. September 24, 2012. Retrieved August 21, 2013.
  32. ↑ "Minn. Supreme Court Sides With HIV-Positive Man". CBS Minnesota. August 21, 2013. Retrieved August 21, 2013.
  33. ↑ "Iowa Code 709C, criminal transmission of HIV". Iowa Legislature. Archived from the original on 25 April 2014. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  34. 1 2 "Our view: Lawmakers must fix HIV law this session". Iowa City Press Citizen. 22 April 2014. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  35. ↑ Iowa Department of Public Health (2014). "Discussion of Revisions to Iowa Code 709C – Criminal Transmission of HIV" (PDF). Fact sheet. The Center for HIV Law and Policy. Retrieved 25 April 2014.
  36. 1 2 "Senate File 2297, Contagious or Infectious Disease Transmission Act". Iowa Legislature. Archived from the original on 25 April 2014. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  37. ↑ MOHNEY, Gillian (27 March 2014). "Controversial HIV Law in Iowa Could Be Changed". ABCnews.com. Retrieved 25 April 2014.
  38. ↑ Noble, Jason (1 May 2014). "Iowa Legislature rewrites 'draconian' HIV transmission bill". Des Moines Register. Archived from the original on 1 May 2014. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
  39. ↑ CDC (August 25, 2021). "Perinatal HIV Testing Laws" . Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  40. ↑ Michael E. Miller (2015-05-05). "Man who knowingly spread HIV sentenced to six months. Judge calls it a 'travesty.'". Washington Post. Retrieved 2015-05-07.
  41. ↑ Marcella Lee (2015-03-09). "Man pleads no contest to willfully spreading HIV". CBS8-San Diego. Retrieved 2015-05-07.
  42. ↑ Matthew Tharrett (2015-05-05). "Man Who Purposefully Infected His Boyfriend With HIV Gets Six Months In Prison". Logo. Retrieved 2015-05-06.
  43. ↑ Young, Saundra (November 9, 2012). "Imprisoned over HIV: One man's story". CNN Health. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  44. ↑ Tom Warnke (June 13, 2014). "Victory! Iowa Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Lambda Legal HIV Criminalization Case". Lambda Legal . Retrieved 2021-11-26.
  45. ↑ "Court of Appeals — Aggravated Assault of a Police Officer: People v. Plunkett". The Daily Record. June 28, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  46. ↑ Shevory, Thomas (2004). Notorious H.I.V.: The Media Spectacle of Nushawn Williams. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 146–7. ISBN   9780816643400.
  47. ↑ St. Clair, Mark (July 26, 2007). "Army: No link found between HIV-positive soldier and unit deployed to Afghanistan". Stars and Stripes. Retrieved December 30, 2012.
  48. ↑ Mims, Bryan (November 1, 2007). "Soldier Pleads Guilty to Passing HIV Infection". WRAL. Retrieved December 30, 2012.
  49. ↑ Melloy, Kilian (December 6, 2007). "Navy Chaplain Faces Court Martial for Gay Sexual Assaults". EDGE. Retrieved December 30, 2012.
  50. ↑ "Air Force "Swinger" In HIV Probe". The Smoking Gun. 2010-08-26. Retrieved 2019-09-12.
  51. ↑ Hegeman, Roxana (2017-08-08). "Lawyer: HIV assault ruling could end all such military cases". Military Times. Retrieved 2019-09-12.
  52. ↑ "Prosecutions for HIV Exposure in the United States, 2008–2013". The Center for HIV Law & Policy, Positive Justice Project. Retrieved August 13, 2013.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.