Deposit return scheme (Scotland)

Last updated

The deposit-return scheme (DRS), is a container return scheme being planned for Scotland. The scheme has been delayed several times and is now due to start in 2025 to coincide with the a United Kingdom scheme. A not-for-profit, publicly owned company, Circularity Scotland Ltd, was set up to operate the scheme [1] however, it went into administration following the latest delay of the scheme. The total level of investment lost as a result of the delay is estimated at £300 million [2] including £9 million of public money which had been invested via the Scottish National Investment Bank. [3]

Contents

Background

The Scottish Government proposed a DRS in 2017 which would recycle single use containers made of PET and Aluminium to reduce litter and address environmental concerns. [4] In May 2019 the Environment Secretary Roseanna Cunningham announced that the scheme would also include glass and that the deposit would be set at 20p. All shops that sell drinks and also all producers would be required to accept all returned containers and pay deposits back the consumer. The scheme would be administered by a not-for-profit limited company called Circularity Scotland Ltd.

After initially being delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic implementation of the scheme came under the remit of the office of Minister for Green Skills, Circular Economy and Biodiversity Lorna Slater in August 2021. In November of that year Ms Slater announced a second delay so she could continue to work with producers to "agree a final timescale and clear milestones for delivery". [5]

Proposed scheme provisions

The scheme would operate along the "producer pays" principle, where the producer pays the proposed deposit amount (20p) to the scheme operator, Circularity Scotland. [6] At each point down the chain, the wholesaler, the retailer, and ultimately the consumer who buy the goods each pay the unit price plus the deposit. Every producer and retailer would also operate a return point, where the consumer would return the container and receive back the deposit. The return point operator would then request back the deposit from Circularity Scotland. [7]

Producers would pay a small surcharge to cover the cost of the scheme and retailers would receive a small handling fee to cover their costs. Each product would need a specific barcode to track returns. All producers and retailers of drinks in bottles and cans in Scotland would need to sign up the scheme to continue selling. [8] When a container is not returned then VAT would be due on the deposit with the liability falling on the producer. [9]

The scheme aimed to increase recycling of used containers to 90% by the second year, and reduce carbon emissions by 4 million tonnes over 25 years. The Scottish Government estimated that 42,000 fewer plastic bottles would be littered every day in Scotland. The direct costs saved by having spending less on cleaning up litter would be £46 million. Including glass would reduce CO2 emissions by 50,000 tonnes per year. [10]

Controversy

Critics argued the scheme would put undue pressure on small retailers as many would not have the staff nor the space to handle returned containers. Automated Reverse Vending Machines cost circa £30,000 with £2,000 for installation. [11] The Scottish Retail Consortium criticised the requirement for those selling drinks online to collect empty containers from customers, as they be unable to use their existing vehicles to collect empty drinks cans and bottles because of food safety risks. [12]

A Scottish Government report in March 2023 said there where major risks in key areas of the scheme. The report gave a "red/amber" status to the scheme meaning it doubted that it could be delivered successfully. [13]

The UK Government said the scheme would create a barrier on trade within the United Kingdom and that it would require an exemption from United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020. However, the UK Government granted an exemption, allowing the Scottish Government to proceed with the scheme provided they remove glass from the scheme. This was because the UK Government's own planned scheme did not include glass and having glass in the Scottish scheme would create a "permanent divergence" within the UK internal market. [14] Despite the removal of glass the chief executive of Circularity Scotland Ltd, David Harris, said the scheme remained "viable" and the impact was "minimal" [15] with drinks producers urging the Scottish Government to push on with the scheme. [16] Scottish Ministers accused the UK Government of sabotage, showing an "utter disregard for devolution" [17] and announced a delay to 2025 to coincide with the proposed UK-wide scheme. Following announcement of the delay major drinks firms including the producers of Irn-Bru, Red Bull and Coca-Cola pulled their financial support for Circularity Scotland Ltd citing "ongoing political uncertainty". [18] Circularity Scotland Ltd subsequently went into administration with the loss of 60 jobs. [19]

Following the delay, the minister in charge of implementing the scheme, Lorna Slater, survived a vote of no confidence by 68 votes to 55. [20] A veteran Scottish National Party Member of the Scottish Parliament Fergus Ewing was suspended from the SNP following his vote with opposition parties of no confidence in Lorna Slater, highlighting internal divisions and political tensions surrounding the scheme's implementation. [21]

Michael Topham, Biffa's chief executive said the company had invested £65 million in the scheme "in good faith" and that they would look to recover this investment over the coming decade. [22] In May 2024 it was confirmed that Biffa lodged a claim for compensation from the Scottish Government at the Court of Session and named the former Circular Economy minister Lorna Slater in the action. [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Product stewardship</span> Managing the environmental impact of different products and materials

Product stewardship is an approach to managing the environmental impacts of different products and materials and at different stages in their production, use and disposal. It acknowledges that those involved in producing, selling, using and disposing of products have a shared responsibility to ensure that those products or materials are managed in a way that reduces their impact, throughout their lifecycle, on the environment and on human health and safety. This approach focusses on the product itself, and everyone involved in the lifespan of the product is called upon to take up responsibility to reduce its environmental, health, and safety impacts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reuse of bottles</span> Waste management

A reusable bottle is a bottle that can be reused, as in the case as by the original bottler or by end-use consumers. Reusable bottles have grown in popularity by consumers for both environmental and health safety reasons. Reusable bottles are one example of reusable packaging.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oregon Bottle Bill</span>

The Oregon Bottle Bill is a container-deposit legislation enacted in the U.S. state of Oregon in 1971 that went into effect in October 1972. It was the first such legislation in the United States. It was amended in 2007 and 2011. It requires applicable beverages in applicable sizes in glass, plastic or metal cans or bottles sold in Oregon to be returnable with a minimum refund value. The refund value was initially 5 cents until April 1, 2017, when it increased to 10 cents. The Oregon Legislature has given the Oregon Liquor Control Commission the authority to administer and enforce the Bottle Bill. Oregon Beverage Recycling Cooperative (OBRC), a private cooperative owned by retailers and beverage distributors, administers the collection and transportation of returned containers and keeps all the unclaimed deposits. Materials from returned containers are sold by the OBRC and proceeds are handed out to beverage distributors. In 2022, the bottle bill was expanded to include canned wine, which will become eligible for redemption on July 1, 2025.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Container-deposit legislation</span> Return of beverage containers for refund

Container-deposit legislation is any law that requires the collection of a monetary deposit on beverage containers at the point of sale and/or the payment of refund value to the consumers. When the container is returned to an authorized redemption center, or retailer in some jurisdictions, the deposit is partly or fully refunded to the redeemer. It is a deposit-refund system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reverse vending machine</span> Machine for recycling bottles and cans

A reverse vending machine (RVM) is a machine that allows a person to insert a used or empty glass bottle, plastic bottle, or aluminum can in exchange for a reward. After inserting the recyclable item, it is then compacted, sorted, and analyzed according to the number of ounces, materials, and brand using the universal product code on the bottle or can. Once the item has been scanned and approved, it is then crushed and sorted into the proper storage space for the classified material. Upon processing the item, the machine rewards people with incentives, such as cash or coupons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glass recycling</span> Processing of turning glass waste into usable products

Glass recycling is the processing of waste glass into usable products. Glass that is crushed or imploded and ready to be remelted is called cullet. There are two types of cullet: internal and external. Internal cullet is composed of defective products detected and rejected by a quality control process during the industrial process of glass manufacturing, transition phases of product changes and production offcuts. External cullet is waste glass that has been collected or reprocessed with the purpose of recycling. External cullet is classified as waste. The word "cullet", when used in the context of end-of-waste, will always refer to external cullet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reuse</span> Using again

Reuse is the action or practice of using an item, whether for its original purpose or to fulfill a different function. It should be distinguished from recycling, which is the breaking down of used items to make raw materials for the manufacture of new products. Reuse—by taking, but not reprocessing, previously used items—helps save time, money, energy and resources. In broader economic terms, it can make quality products available to people and organizations with limited means, while generating jobs and business activity that contribute to the economy.

California Redemption Value (CRV), also known as California Refund Value, is a regulatory fee paid on recyclable beverage containers in the U.S. state of California. The fee was established by the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act of 1986 and further extended to additional beverage types in California State Senate Bill No. 1013, signed into law on September 28, 2022 and taking effect on January 1, 2024; since 2010 the program has been administered by the Cal/EPA California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle).

Recycling in the Netherlands is under the responsibility of local authorities. Different localities implement different systems, and also within a municipality there can be multiple regimes. Municipalities publish a yearly calendar of the pickup dates and the addresses of the waste separation and recycling stations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recycling in the United Kingdom</span>

In 2015, 43.5% of the United Kingdom's municipal waste was recycled, composted or broken down by anaerobic digestion. The majority of recycling undertaken in the United Kingdom is done by statutory authorities, although commercial and industrial waste is chiefly processed by private companies. Local Authorities are responsible for the collection of municipal waste and operate contracts which are usually kerbside collection schemes. The Household Waste Recycling Act 2003 required local authorities in England to provide every household with a separate collection of at least two types of recyclable materials by 2010. Recycling policy is devolved to the administrations of Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales who set their own targets, but all statistics are reported to Eurostat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tennessee Bottle Bill</span>

The Tennessee Bottle Bill is citizen-supported container-deposit recycling legislation, which if enacted will place a 5-cent deposit on beverage containers sold in Tennessee. The bill applies to containers made of aluminum/bimetal, glass or any plastic, containing soft drinks, beer/malt beverages, carbonated or non-carbonated waters, plain or flavored waters, energy drinks, juices, iced teas or iced coffees. Milk/dairy, nutritional drinks and wine and spirits are not included in the program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Container deposit legislation in the United States</span> Overview of the container deposit legislation in United States of America

There are ten states in the United States of America with container deposit legislation, popularly called "bottle bills" after the Oregon Bottle Bill, the first such legislation that was passed.

The Ontario Deposit Return Program (ODRP), also simply known as Bag it Back, is a regulation of the province of Ontario, Canada. Its purpose is to divert recyclable materials from landfill or low-quality recycling uses by charging a fee for each alcoholic beverage container sold in the province, and processing the material for re-use or other recycling activities once the containers are returned for a refund of the deposit fee. Customers forfeit the deposit fee if the container is not returned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Container deposit legislation in Australia</span>

Container deposit legislation (CDL), also known as a container deposit scheme (CDS), is a scheme that was first implemented in South Australia in 1977 and over the decades has spread to the Northern Territory in 2012, New South Wales in 2017, the Australian Capital Territory in June 2018, Queensland in November 2018, Western Australia in October 2020 and Victoria in November 2023. The scheme is due to commence in the last remaining state of Tasmania in early 2024.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deposit-refund system</span> Surcharge refunded when part of a product is returned

A deposit-refund system (DRS), also known as deposit-return system, advance deposit fee or deposit-return scheme, is a surcharge on a product when purchased and a rebate when it is returned. A well-known example is when container deposit legislation mandates that a refund is given when reusable packaging is returned. A DRS is a market-based instrument to address externalities, similar to a pigovian tax, with the key difference that a DRS refunds the fee after the product is returned. This provides an incentive to consumers to properly dispose of a product.

The Massachusetts Bottle Bill is a container-deposit legislation dealing with recycling in the United States that originally passed in the U.S. state of Massachusetts in 1982 as the Beverage Container Recovery Law. Implemented in 1983, the law requires containers of carbonated beverages to be returnable with a minimum return value of $0.05. The bottle bill does not cover containers of non-carbonated beverages like water, tea, or sports drinks. The law also establishes the handling fee paid by distributors to redemption centers, $0.0325 per unit as of July 5, 2013, and to retailers $0.0225 per unit. As the number of non-deposit beverage containers has increased to represent over one-third of beverage containers sold, the Bottle Bill has no influence on these non-deposit containers, with the result that these containers are three times more likely to be found as litter in Massachusetts communities. Additional studies indicate that beverage containers covered by the state's container deposit system are redeemed at approximately 70% and another 9% are recycled via curbside programs. Conversely, containers that are not covered, such as bottled water, juices, and sports drinks, are recycled at approximately 25%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recycling in Australia</span> Method of waste management in Australia

Recycling in Australia is a widespread, and comprehensive part of waste management in Australia, with 60% of all waste collected being recycled. Recycling is collected from households, commercial businesses, industries and construction. Despite its prominence, household recycling makes up only a small part (13%) of Australia's total recycling. It generally occurs through kerbside recycling collections such as the commingled recycling bin and food/garden organics recycling bin, drop-off and take-back programs, and various other schemes. Collection and management of household recycling typically falls to local councils, with private contractors collecting commercial, industrial and construction recycling. In addition to local council regulations, legislation and overarching policies are implemented and managed by the state and federal governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of bottle recycling in the United States</span>

The history of bottle recycling in the United States has been characterized by four distinct stages. In the first stage, during the late 18th century and early 19th century, most bottles were reused or returned. When bottles were mass-produced, people started throwing them out, which led to the introduction of bottle deposits. However, during the second stage, after World War II, consumption patterns changed and nonreturnable containers became popular, which littered the environment. Some states implemented "bottle bills" that instituted deposits. The beverage-container industry first implemented private recycling programs and then pushed for municipal curbside recycling as an alternative to "bottle bills". More recently, PET bottles have largely replaced other materials. The United States used to be the front-runner when it came to recycling PET, but European countries have since outpaced the US.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lorna Slater</span> Co-leader of the Scottish Greens

Lorna Slater is a Canadian-born Scottish politician, who served as Minister for Green Skills, Circular Economy and Biodiversity in the Scottish Government from 2021 to 2024.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 Scottish government crisis</span> Events leading to Humza Yousafs resignation

In April 2024, Humza Yousaf, first minister of Scotland and leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP), faced a confidence challenge following his termination of the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens, which meant that Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater, co-leaders of the Greens and their only government ministers, were removed from government. This was following changes to landmark climate policy by Cabinet Secretary for Wellbeing Economy, Net Zero and Energy Màiri McAllan, after which a planned Greens vote on the continuation of the agreement was announced. Facing a motion of confidence in him Yousaf announced his intention to resign as first minister and party leader on 29 April.

References

  1. ↑ "Scottish Government Deposit Return Scheme". Managing Waste. The Scottish Government.
  2. ↑ "Scottish Government could face £300m compensation bill over deposit return scheme delay". The Daily Record. 9 June 2023. Retrieved 30 June 2023.
  3. ↑ "Scotland recycling failure doubles National Investment Bank losses". The Financial Times.
  4. ↑ "Scotland plans deposit return scheme for bottles and cans". The Guardian. 5 September 2017.
  5. ↑ "Scotland's drinks recycling scheme delayed indefinitely, less than a week after COP26". iNews. 17 November 2021.
  6. ↑ "Why has Scotland's Deposit Return Scheme been delayed?". BBC. 7 June 2023.
  7. ↑ Greenfield, Patrick (4 September 2017). "Scotland plans deposit return scheme for bottles and cans". The Guardian.
  8. ↑ "Why is the deposit return scheme so controversial?". The Ferret. 10 March 2023.
  9. ↑ "HMRC clarifies VAT on DRS deposits, Scottish Government says". letsrecycle.com. 2023-02-14. Retrieved 2024-05-13.
  10. ↑ "Deposit Return Scheme Environmental Benefits". www.zerowastescotland.org.uk. Retrieved 2024-02-28.
  11. ↑ "The hidden dangers of deposit return schemes". Scottish Local Retailer Magazine. 4 September 2015.
  12. ↑ "Deposit return 'could end online drink sales' by some firms". The Insider. 18 May 2023.
  13. ↑ "Bottle return scheme problems reported months before UK rejection". BBC. 29 June 2023.
  14. ↑ "UK Government will permit Scottish deposit return scheme – but without glass". The Independent. 27 May 2023.
  15. ↑ "Biffa chief urges Scotland not to delay DRS". LetsRecycle.com. 7 June 2023.
  16. ↑ "Drinks producers urge Scottish Government to push on with DRS despite glass ban". The Herald. 6 June 2023.
  17. ↑ "Government accused of 'sabotage' over Scottish bottle return scheme". Sky News.
  18. ↑ "Major drinks firms pull support from company running recycling scheme". The Times. 16 June 2023.
  19. ↑ "Westminster accused of 'destroying' DRS as Circularity Scotland enters administration". The Drinks Business. 22 June 2023. Retrieved 30 June 2023.
  20. ↑ Media, P. A. (2023-06-20). "Lorna Slater no-confidence motion voted down by 68 votes to 55". STV News. Retrieved 2024-02-28.
  21. ↑ "Fergus Ewing loses appeal against SNP suspension". BBC News. 2024-02-27. Retrieved 2024-02-28.
  22. ↑ "SNP's failed bottle deposit scheme has cost £186m and taxpayers could bear brunt". The Dailly Telegraph.
  23. ↑ "Waste firm Biffa lodges claim over failed recycling plan". Daily Business. Retrieved 2024-05-12.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.