Dimensionless physical constant

Last updated

In physics, a dimensionless physical constant is a physical constant that is dimensionless, i.e. a pure number having no units attached and having a numerical value that is independent of whatever system of units may be used. [1]

Contents

The concept should not be confused with dimensionless numbers , that are not universally constant, and remain constant only for a particular phenomenon. In aerodynamics for example, if one considers one particular airfoil, the Reynolds number value of the laminar–turbulent transition is one relevant dimensionless number of the problem. However, it is strictly related to the particular problem: for example, it is related to the airfoil being considered and also to the type of fluid in which it moves.

The term fundamental physical constant is sometimes used to refer to some universal dimensionless constants. Perhaps the best-known example is the fine-structure constant, α, which has an approximate value of 1137.036. [2]

Terminology

It has been argued the term fundamental physical constant should be restricted to the dimensionless universal physical constants that currently cannot be derived from any other source; [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] this stricter definition is followed here.

However, the term fundamental physical constant has also been used occasionally to refer to certain universal dimensioned physical constants, such as the speed of light c, vacuum permittivity ε0, Planck constant h, and the gravitational constant G, that appear in the most basic theories of physics. [8] [9] [10] [11] NIST [8] and CODATA [12] sometimes used the term in this less strict manner.

Characteristics

There is no exhaustive list of such constants but it does make sense to ask about the minimal number of fundamental constants necessary to determine a given physical theory. Thus, the Standard Model requires 25 physical constants. About half of them are the masses of fundamental particles, which become "dimensionless" when expressed relative to the Planck mass or, alternatively, as coupling strength with the Higgs field along with the gravitational constant. [13]

Fundamental physical constants cannot be derived and have to be measured. Developments in physics may lead to either a reduction or an extension of their number: discovery of new particles, or new relationships between physical phenomena, would introduce new constants, while the development of a more fundamental theory might allow the derivation of several constants from a more fundamental constant.

A long-sought goal of theoretical physics is to find first principles (theory of everything) from which all of the fundamental dimensionless constants can be calculated and compared to the measured values.

The large number of fundamental constants required in the Standard Model has been regarded as unsatisfactory since the theory's formulation in the 1970s. The desire for a theory that would allow the calculation of particle masses is a core motivation for the search for "Physics beyond the Standard Model".

History

In the 1920s and 1930s, Arthur Eddington embarked upon extensive mathematical investigation into the relations between the fundamental quantities in basic physical theories, later used as part of his effort to construct an overarching theory unifying quantum mechanics and cosmological physics. For example, he speculated on the potential consequences of the ratio of the electron radius to its mass. Most notably, in a 1929 paper he set out an argument based on the Pauli exclusion principle and the Dirac equation that fixed the value of the reciprocal of the fine-structure constant as 𝛼−1 = 16 + 12 × 16 × (16 − 1) = 136. When its value was discovered to be closer to 137, he changed his argument to match that value. His ideas were not widely accepted, and subsequent experiments have shown that they were wrong (for example, none of the measurements of the fine-structure constant suggest an integer value; in 2018 it was measured at α = 1/137.035999046(27)). [14]

Though his derivations and equations were unfounded, Eddington was the first physicist to recognize the significance of universal dimensionless constants, now considered among the most critical components of major physical theories such as the Standard Model and ΛCDM cosmology. [15] He was also the first to argue for the importance of the cosmological constant Λ itself, considering it vital for explaining the expansion of the universe, at a time when most physicists (including its discoverer, Albert Einstein) considered it an outright mistake or mathematical artifact and assumed a value of zero: this at least proved prescient, and a significant positive Λ features prominently in ΛCDM.

Eddington may have been the first to attempt in vain to derive the basic dimensionless constants from fundamental theories and equations, but he was certainly not the last. Many others would subsequently undertake similar endeavors, and efforts occasionally continue even today. None have yet produced convincing results or gained wide acceptance among theoretical physicists. [16] [17]

An empirical relation between the masses of the electron, muon and tau has been discovered by physicist Yoshio Koide, but this formula remains unexplained. [18]

Examples

Dimensionless fundamental physical constants include:

Fine-structure constant

One of the dimensionless fundamental constants is the fine-structure constant:

where e is the elementary charge, ħ is the reduced Planck constant, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. The fine-structure constant is fixed to the strength of the electromagnetic force. At low energies, α1137, whereas at the scale of the Z boson, about 90  GeV, one measures α1127. There is no accepted theory explaining the value of α; Richard Feynman elaborates:

There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the observed coupling constant, e  the amplitude for a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455. (My physicist friends won't recognize this number, because they like to remember it as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with about an uncertainty of about 2 in the last decimal place. It has been a mystery ever since it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it.) Immediately you would like to know where this number for a coupling comes from: is it related to pi or perhaps to the base of natural logarithms? Nobody knows. It's one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man. You might say the "hand of God" wrote that number, and "we don't know how He pushed his pencil." We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don't know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!

Richard P. Feynman (1985). QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton University Press. p. 129. ISBN   978-0-691-08388-9.

Standard model

The original standard model of particle physics from the 1970s contained 19 fundamental dimensionless constants describing the masses of the particles and the strengths of the electroweak and strong forces. In the 1990s, neutrinos were discovered to have nonzero mass, and a quantity called the vacuum angle was found to be indistinguishable from zero.[ citation needed ]

The complete standard model requires 25 fundamental dimensionless constants (Baez, 2011). At present, their numerical values are not understood in terms of any widely accepted theory and are determined only from measurement. These 25 constants are:

Cosmological constants

The cosmological constant, which can be thought of as the density of dark energy in the universe, is a fundamental constant in physical cosmology that has a dimensionless value of approximately 10−122. [19] Other dimensionless constants are the measure of homogeneity in the universe, denoted by Q, which is explained below by Martin Rees, the baryon mass per photon, the cold dark matter mass per photon and the neutrino mass per photon. [20]

Barrow and Tipler

Barrow and Tipler (1986) anchor their broad-ranging discussion of astrophysics, cosmology, quantum physics, teleology, and the anthropic principle in the fine-structure constant, the proton-to-electron mass ratio (which they, along with Barrow (2002), call β), and the coupling constants for the strong force and gravitation.

Martin Rees's Six Numbers

Martin Rees, in his book Just Six Numbers, [21] mulls over the following six dimensionless constants, whose values he deems fundamental to present-day physical theory and the known structure of the universe:

N and ε govern the fundamental interactions of physics. The other constants (D excepted) govern the size, age, and expansion of the universe. These five constants must be estimated empirically. D, on the other hand, is necessarily a nonzero natural number and does not have an uncertainty. Hence most physicists would not deem it a dimensionless physical constant of the sort discussed in this entry.

Any plausible fundamental physical theory must be consistent with these six constants, and must either derive their values from the mathematics of the theory, or accept their values as empirical.

See also

Related Research Articles

The anthropic principle, also known as the "observation selection effect", is the hypothesis, first proposed in 1957 by Robert Dicke, that the range of possible observations that could be made about the universe is limited by the fact that observations could happen only in a universe capable of developing intelligent life. Proponents of the anthropic principle argue that it explains why the universe has the age and the fundamental physical constants necessary to accommodate conscious life, since if either had been different, no one would have been around to make observations. Anthropic reasoning is often used to deal with the idea that the universe seems to be finely tuned for the existence of life.

A physical constant, sometimes fundamental physical constant or universal constant, is a physical quantity that cannot be explained by a theory and therefore must be measured experimentally. It is distinct from a mathematical constant, which has a fixed numerical value, but does not directly involve any physical measurement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmological constant</span> Constant representing stress–energy density of the vacuum

In cosmology, the cosmological constant, alternatively called Einstein's cosmological constant, is the constant coefficient of a term that Albert Einstein temporarily added to his field equations of general relativity. He later removed it, however much later it was revived and reinterpreted as the energy density of space, or vacuum energy, that arises in quantum mechanics. It is closely associated with the concept of dark energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fine-structure constant</span> Dimensionless number that quantifies the strength of the electromagnetic interaction

In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as the Sommerfeld constant, commonly denoted by α, is a fundamental physical constant which quantifies the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles.

Dimensionless quantities, also known as quantities of dimension one are implicitly defined in a manner that prevents their aggregation into units of measurement. Typically expressed as ratios that align with another system, these quantities do not necessitate explicitly defined units. For instance, alcohol by volume (ABV) represents a volumetric ratio. Its derivation remains independent of the specific units of volume used; any common unit may be applied. Notably, ABV is never expressed as milliliters per milliliter, underscoring its dimensionless nature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eddington number</span> Number of protons in the observable universe

In astrophysics, the Eddington number, NEdd, is the number of protons in the observable universe. Eddington originally calculated it as about 1.57×1079; current estimates make it approximately 1080.

The characterization of the universe as finely tuned intends to explain why the known constants of nature, such as the electron charge, the gravitational constant, and the like, have the values that we measure rather than some other arbitrary values. According to the "fine-tuned universe" hypothesis, if these constants' values were too different from what they are, "life as we know it" could not exist. In practice, this hypothesis is formulated in terms of dimensionless physical constants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hierarchy problem</span> Unsolved problem in physics

In theoretical physics, the hierarchy problem is the problem concerning the large discrepancy between aspects of the weak force and gravity. There is no scientific consensus on why, for example, the weak force is 1024 times stronger than gravity.

A variable speed of light (VSL) is a feature of a family of hypotheses stating that the speed of light may in some way not be constant, for example, that it varies in space or time, or depending on frequency. Accepted classical theories of physics, and in particular general relativity, predict a constant speed of light in any local frame of reference and in some situations these predict apparent variations of the speed of light depending on frame of reference, but this article does not refer to this as a variable speed of light. Various alternative theories of gravitation and cosmology, many of them non-mainstream, incorporate variations in the local speed of light.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dirac large numbers hypothesis</span> Hypothesis relating age of the universe to physical constants

The Dirac large numbers hypothesis (LNH) is an observation made by Paul Dirac in 1937 relating ratios of size scales in the Universe to that of force scales. The ratios constitute very large, dimensionless numbers: some 40 orders of magnitude in the present cosmological epoch. According to Dirac's hypothesis, the apparent similarity of these ratios might not be a mere coincidence but instead could imply a cosmology with these unusual features:

In quantum electrodynamics, the anomalous magnetic moment of a particle is a contribution of effects of quantum mechanics, expressed by Feynman diagrams with loops, to the magnetic moment of that particle. The magnetic moment, also called magnetic dipole moment, is a measure of the strength of a magnetic source.

In string theory, the string theory landscape is the collection of possible false vacua, together comprising a collective "landscape" of choices of parameters governing compactifications.

In physics, naturalness is the aesthetic property that the dimensionless ratios between free parameters or physical constants appearing in a physical theory should take values "of order 1" and that free parameters are not fine-tuned. That is, a natural theory would have parameter ratios with values like 2.34 rather than 234000 or 0.000234.

In physics, the proton-to-electron mass ratio is the rest mass of the proton divided by that of the electron, a dimensionless quantity, namely:

In physics, the Stoney units form a system of units named after the Irish physicist George Johnstone Stoney, who first proposed them in 1881. They are the earliest example of natural units, i.e., a coherent set of units of measurement designed so that chosen physical constants fully define and are included in the set.

In particle physics and physical cosmology, Planck units are a system of units of measurement defined exclusively in terms of four universal physical constants: c, G, ħ, and kB. Expressing one of these physical constants in terms of Planck units yields a numerical value of 1. They are a system of natural units, defined using fundamental properties of nature rather than properties of a chosen prototype object. Originally proposed in 1899 by German physicist Max Planck, they are relevant in research on unified theories such as quantum gravity.

In physics, natural unit systems are measurement systems for which certain physical constants have been set to 1 through nondimensionalization of physical units. For example, the speed of light c may be set to 1, and it may then be omitted, equating mass and energy directly E=m rather than using c as a conversion factor in the typical mass–energy equivalence equation E=mc2. A purely natural system of units has all of its dimensions collapsed, such that the physical constants completely define the system of units and the relevant physical laws contain no conversion constants.

The asymptotic safety approach to quantum gravity provides a nonperturbative notion of renormalization in order to find a consistent and predictive quantum field theory of the gravitational interaction and spacetime geometry. It is based upon a nontrivial fixed point of the corresponding renormalization group (RG) flow such that the running coupling constants approach this fixed point in the ultraviolet (UV) limit. This suffices to avoid divergences in physical observables. Moreover, it has predictive power: Generically an arbitrary starting configuration of coupling constants given at some RG scale does not run into the fixed point for increasing scale, but a subset of configurations might have the desired UV properties. For this reason it is possible that — assuming a particular set of couplings has been measured in an experiment — the requirement of asymptotic safety fixes all remaining couplings in such a way that the UV fixed point is approached.

The term physical constant expresses the notion of a physical quantity subject to experimental measurement which is independent of the time or location of the experiment. The constancy (immutability) of any "physical constant" is thus subject to experimental verification.

References

  1. Stroke, H. H., ed., The Physical Review: The First Hundred Years (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1995), p. 525.
  2. Vértes, A., Nagy, S., Klencsár, Z., Lovas, R. G., & Rösch, F., eds., Handbook of Nuclear Chemistry, (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2011), p. 367.
  3. Baez, John (2011-04-22). "How Many Fundamental Constants Are There?". math.ucr.edu. Retrieved 2018-04-13.
  4. Rich, James (2013-04-02). "Dimensionless constants and cosmological measurements". arXiv: 1304.0577 [astro-ph.CO].
  5. Michael Duff (2014). "How fundamental are fundamental constants?". Contemporary Physics. 56 (1): 35–47. arXiv: 1412.2040 . Bibcode:2015ConPh..56...35D. doi:10.1080/00107514.2014.980093. S2CID   118347723.
  6. Duff, M. J. (13 August 2002). "Comment on time-variation of fundamental constants". arXiv: hep-th/0208093 .
  7. Duff, M. J.; Okun, L. B.; Veneziano, G. (2002). "Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants". Journal of High Energy Physics . 2002 (3): 023. arXiv: physics/0110060 . Bibcode:2002JHEP...03..023D. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/03/023. S2CID   15806354.
  8. 1 2 "Introduction to the Fundamental Physical Constants". physics.nist.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-13.
  9. http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ NIST
  10. "Physical constant". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2018-04-13.
  11. Karshenboim, Savely G. (August 2005). "Fundamental Physical Constants: Looking from Different Angles". Canadian Journal of Physics . 83 (8): 767–811. arXiv: physics/0506173 . Bibcode:2005CaJPh..83..767K. doi:10.1139/p05-047. ISSN   0008-4204. S2CID   475086.
  12. Mohr, Peter J.; Newell, David B.; Taylor, Barry N. (2016-09-26). "CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2014". Reviews of Modern Physics. 88 (3): 035009. arXiv: 1507.07956 . Bibcode:2016RvMP...88c5009M. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035009. ISSN   0034-6861. S2CID   1115862.
  13. Kuntz, I., Gravitational Theories Beyond General Relativity, (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2019), pp. 58–61.
  14. Parker, Richard H.; Yu, Chenghui; Zhong, Weicheng; Estey, Brian; Müller, Holger (2018-04-13). "Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model". Science. 360 (6385): 191–195. arXiv: 1812.04130 . Bibcode:2018Sci...360..191P. doi:10.1126/science.aap7706. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   29650669. S2CID   4875011.
  15. Prialnik, D. K., An Introduction to the Theory of Stellar Structure and Evolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 82.
  16. Kragh, Helge (2015-10-14). "On Arthur Eddington's Theory of Everything". arXiv: 1510.04046 [physics.hist-ph].
  17. Gamow, G. (1968-02-01). "Numerology of the Constants of Nature". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 59 (2): 313–318. Bibcode:1968PNAS...59..313G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.2.313 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   224670 . PMID   16591598.
  18. Rivero, A.; Gsponer, A. (February 2, 2008). "The strange formula of Dr. Koide". p. 4. arXiv: hep-ph/0505220 .
  19. Jaffe, R. L., & Taylor, W., The Physics of Energy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), p. 419.
  20. Tegmark, Max (2014). Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p.  252. ISBN   9780307599803.
  21. Radford, T., "Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe by Martin Rees—review", The Guardian , June 8, 2012.
  22. 1 2 Rees, M. (2000), p. .
  23. Rees, M. (2000), p. 53.
  24. Rees, M. (2000), p. 110.
  25. Rees, M. (2000), p. 118.

Bibliography

External articles

General
Articles on variance of the fundamental constants