Dynamic global vegetation model

Last updated
Example DGVM output DGVM.jpg
Example DGVM output

A Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (DGVM) is a computer program that simulates shifts in potential vegetation and its associated biogeochemical and hydrological cycles as a response to shifts in climate. DGVMs use time series of climate data and, given constraints of latitude, topography, and soil characteristics, simulate monthly or daily dynamics of ecosystem processes. DGVMs are used most often to simulate the effects of future climate change on natural vegetation and its carbon and water cycles.

Contents

Model development

DGVMs generally combine biogeochemistry, biogeography, and disturbance submodels. Disturbance is often limited to wildfires, but in principle could include any of: forest/land management decisions, windthrow, insect damage, ozone damage etc. DGVMs usually "spin up" their simulations from bare ground to equilibrium vegetation (e.g. climax community) to establish realistic initial values for their various "pools": carbon and nitrogen in live and dead vegetation, soil organic matter, etc. corresponding to a documented historical vegetation cover.

2011-2020 Global carbon budget The 2011-2022 decadal mean components of the global carbon budget.png
2011–2020 Global carbon budget

DGVMs are usually run in a spatially distributed mode, with simulations carried out for thousands of "cells", geographic points which are assumed to have homogeneous conditions within each cell. Simulations are carried out across a range of spatial scales, from global to landscape. Cells are usually arranged as lattice points; the distance between adjacent lattice points may be as coarse as a few degrees of latitude or longitude, or as fine as 30 arc-seconds. Simulations of the conterminous United States in the first DGVM comparison exercise (LPJ and MC1) called the VEMAP project, [1] in the 1990s used a lattice grain of one-half degree. Global simulations by the PIK group and collaborators, [2] using 6 different DGVMs (HYBRID, IBIS, LPJ, SDGVM, TRIFFID, and VECODE) used the same resolution as the general circulation model (GCM) that provided the climate data, 3.75 deg longitude x 2.5 deg latitude, a total of 1631 land grid cells. Sometimes lattice distances are specified in kilometers rather than angular measure, especially for finer grains, so a project like VEMAP [3] is often referred to as 50 km grain.

Several DGVMs appeared in the middle 1990s. The first was apparently IBIS (Foley et al., 1996), VECODE (Brovkin et al., 1997), followed by several others described below:

Groups

Several DGVMs have been developed by various research groups around the world:

The next generation of models – Earth system models (ex. CCSM, [22] ORCHIDEE, [23] JULES, [24] CTEM [25] ) – now includes the important feedbacks from the biosphere to the atmosphere so that vegetation shifts and changes in the carbon and hydrological cycles affect the climate.

DGVMs commonly simulate a variety of plant and soil physiological processes. The processes simulated by various DGVMs are summarized in the table below. Abbreviations are: NPP, net primary production; PFT, plant functional type; SAW, soil available water; LAI, leaf area index; I, solar radiation; T, air temperature; Wr, root zone water supply; PET, potential evapotranspiration; vegc, total live vegetation carbon.

process/attributeformulation/valueDGVMs
shortest time step1 hourIBIS, ED2
2 hoursTRIFFID
12 hoursHYBRID
1 dayLPJ, SDGVM, SEIB-DGVM, MC1 fire submodel
1 monthMC1 except fire submodel
1 yearVECODE
photosynthesisFarquhar et al. (1980) [26] HYBRID
Farquhar et al. (1980)
Collatz et al. (1992) [27]
IBIS, LPJ, SDGVM
Collatz et al. (1991) [28]
Collatz et al. (1992)
TRIFFID
stomatal conductanceJarvis (1976) [29]
Stewart (1988) [30]
HYBRID
Leuning (1995) [31] IBIS, SDGVM, SEIB-DGVM
Haxeltine & Prentice (1996) [32] LPJ
Cox et al. (1998) [33] TRIFFID
productionforest NPP = f(PFT, vegc, T, SAW, P, ...)
grass NPP = f(PFT, vegc, T, SAW, P, light competition, ...)
MC1
GPP = f(I, LAI, T, Wr, PET, CO2)LPJ
competitionfor light, water, and NMC1, HYBRID
for light and waterLPJ, IBIS, SDGVM, SEIB-DGVM
Lotka-Volterra in fractional coverTRIFFID
Climate-dependentVECODE
establishmentAll PFTs establish uniformly as small individualsHYBRID
Climatically favored PFTs establish uniformly, as small individualsSEIB-DGVM
Climatically favored PFTs establish uniformly, as small LAI incrementIBIS
Climatically favored PFTs establish in proportion to area available, as small individualsLPJ, SDGVM
Minimum 'seed' fraction for all PFTsTRIFFID
mortalityDependent on carbon poolsHYBRID
Deterministic baseline, wind throw, fire, extreme temperaturesIBIS
Deterministic baseline, self-thinning, carbon balance, fire, extreme temperaturesLPJ, SEIB-DGVM, ED2
Carbon balance, wind throw, fire, extreme temperaturesSDGVM
Prescribed disturbance rate for each PFTTRIFFID
Climate-dependent, based on carbon balanceVECODE
Self-thinning, fire, extreme temperatures, droughtMC1

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecosystem</span> Community of living organisms together with the nonliving components of their environment

An ecosystem is a system that environments and their organisms form through their interaction. The biotic and abiotic components are linked together through nutrient cycles and energy flows.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon cycle</span> Natural processes of carbon exchange

The carbon cycle is that part of the biogeochemical cycle by which carbon is exchanged among the biosphere, pedosphere, geosphere, hydrosphere, and atmosphere of Earth. Other major biogeochemical cycles include the nitrogen cycle and the water cycle. Carbon is the main component of biological compounds as well as a major component of many minerals such as limestone. The carbon cycle comprises a sequence of events that are key to making Earth capable of sustaining life. It describes the movement of carbon as it is recycled and reused throughout the biosphere, as well as long-term processes of carbon sequestration (storage) to and release from carbon sinks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Primary production</span> Synthesis of organic compounds from carbon dioxide by biological organisms

In ecology, primary production is the synthesis of organic compounds from atmospheric or aqueous carbon dioxide. It principally occurs through the process of photosynthesis, which uses light as its source of energy, but it also occurs through chemosynthesis, which uses the oxidation or reduction of inorganic chemical compounds as its source of energy. Almost all life on Earth relies directly or indirectly on primary production. The organisms responsible for primary production are known as primary producers or autotrophs, and form the base of the food chain. In terrestrial ecoregions, these are mainly plants, while in aquatic ecoregions algae predominate in this role. Ecologists distinguish primary production as either net or gross, the former accounting for losses to processes such as cellular respiration, the latter not.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biogeochemical cycle</span> Chemical transfer pathway between Earths biological and non-biological parts

A biogeochemical cycle, or more generally a cycle of matter, is the movement and transformation of chemical elements and compounds between living organisms, the atmosphere, and the Earth's crust. Major biogeochemical cycles include the carbon cycle, the nitrogen cycle and the water cycle. In each cycle, the chemical element or molecule is transformed and cycled by living organisms and through various geological forms and reservoirs, including the atmosphere, the soil and the oceans. It can be thought of as the pathway by which a chemical substance cycles the biotic compartment and the abiotic compartments of Earth. The biotic compartment is the biosphere and the abiotic compartments are the atmosphere, lithosphere and hydrosphere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biogeochemistry</span> Study of chemical cycles of the earth that are either driven by or influence biological activity

Biogeochemistry is the scientific discipline that involves the study of the chemical, physical, geological, and biological processes and reactions that govern the composition of the natural environment. In particular, biogeochemistry is the study of biogeochemical cycles, the cycles of chemical elements such as carbon and nitrogen, and their interactions with and incorporation into living things transported through earth scale biological systems in space and time. The field focuses on chemical cycles which are either driven by or influence biological activity. Particular emphasis is placed on the study of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, iron, and phosphorus cycles. Biogeochemistry is a systems science closely related to systems ecology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iron cycle</span>

The iron cycle (Fe) is the biogeochemical cycle of iron through the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere and lithosphere. While Fe is highly abundant in the Earth's crust, it is less common in oxygenated surface waters. Iron is a key micronutrient in primary productivity, and a limiting nutrient in the Southern ocean, eastern equatorial Pacific, and the subarctic Pacific referred to as High-Nutrient, Low-Chlorophyll (HNLC) regions of the ocean.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecohydrology</span>

Ecohydrology is an interdisciplinary scientific field studying the interactions between water and ecological systems. It is considered a sub discipline of hydrology, with an ecological focus. These interactions may take place within water bodies, such as rivers and lakes, or on land, in forests, deserts, and other terrestrial ecosystems. Areas of research in ecohydrology include transpiration and plant water use, adaption of organisms to their water environment, influence of vegetation and benthic plants on stream flow and function, and feedbacks between ecological processes, the soil carbon sponge and the hydrological cycle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FLUXNET</span> Global network of micrometeorological towers

FLUXNET is a global network of micrometeorological tower sites that use eddy covariance methods to measure the exchanges of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy between the biosphere and atmosphere. FLUXNET is a global 'network of regional networks' that serves to provide an infrastructure to compile, archive and distribute data for the scientific community. The most recent FLUXNET data product, FLUXNET2015, is hosted by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (USA) and is publicly available for download. Currently there are over 1000 active and historic flux measurement sites.

IBIS-2 is the version 2 of the land-surface model Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS), which includes several major improvements and additions to the prototype model developed by Foley et al. [1996]. IBIS was designed to explicitly link land surface and hydrological processes, terrestrial biogeochemical cycles, and vegetation dynamics within a single physically consistent framework

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biosphere model</span>

In climate science, a biosphere model, is used to model the biosphere of Earth, and can be coupled with atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) for modelling the entire climate system. It has been suggested that terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) are a more inclusive term than land surface models (LSMs). The representation of roots in TBMs, however, remains relatively crude. Particularly, the dynamic functions of roots and phylogenetic basis of water uptake remain largely absent in TBMs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bacterioplankton</span> Bacterial component of the plankton that drifts in the water column

Bacterioplankton refers to the bacterial component of the plankton that drifts in the water column. The name comes from the Ancient Greek word πλανκτος, meaning "wanderer" or "drifter", and bacterium, a Latin term coined in the 19th century by Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg. They are found in both seawater and freshwater.

Berrien Moore III is the former director of the Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space at the University of New Hampshire and the founding director of Climate Central. In June 2010, he accepted a set of linked positions at the University of Oklahoma: Vice President, Weather & Climate Programs, Director, National Weather Center, and Dean, College of Atmospheric and Geographic Sciences. He holds the Chesapeake Energy Corporation Chair in Climate Studies. Moore was a coordinating lead author of the final chapter of the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an organisation that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Among his other honors are the 2007 Dryden Lectureship in Research from the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and NASA Distinguished Public Service Medal. Moore holds a Ph.D. in Mathematics from the University of Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change feedbacks</span> Feedback related to climate change

Climate change feedbacks are effects of global warming that amplify or diminish the effect of forces that initially cause the warming. Positive feedbacks enhance global warming while negative feedbacks weaken it. Feedbacks are important in the understanding of climate change because they play an important part in determining the sensitivity of the climate to warming forces. Climate forcings and feedbacks together determine how much and how fast the climate changes. Large positive feedbacks can lead to tipping points—abrupt or irreversible changes in the climate system—depending upon the rate and magnitude of the climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terrestrial biological carbon cycle</span>

The carbon cycle is an essential part of life on Earth. About half the dry weight of most living organisms is carbon. It plays an important role in the structure, biochemistry, and nutrition of all living cells. Living biomass holds about 550 gigatons of carbon, most of which is made of terrestrial plants (wood), while some 1,200 gigatons of carbon are stored in the terrestrial biosphere as dead biomass.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Beerling</span> British professor of natural sciences

David John Beerling FLSW is the Director of the Leverhulme Centre for Climate change mitigation and Sorby Professor of Natural Sciences in the Department of Animal and Plant Sciences (APS) at the University of Sheffield, UK. He is also Editor-in-Chief of the Royal Society journal Biology Letters.

CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization effect Fertilization from increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide

The CO2 fertilization effect or carbon fertilization effect causes an increased rate of photosynthesis while limiting leaf transpiration in plants. Both processes result from increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). The carbon fertilization effect varies depending on plant species, air and soil temperature, and availability of water and nutrients. Net primary productivity (NPP) might positively respond to the carbon fertilization effect. Although, evidence shows that enhanced rates of photosynthesis in plants due to CO2 fertilization do not directly enhance all plant growth, and thus carbon storage. The carbon fertilization effect has been reported to be the cause of 44% of gross primary productivity (GPP) increase since the 2000s. Earth System Models, Land System Models and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models are used to investigate and interpret vegetation trends related to increasing levels of atmospheric CO2. However, the ecosystem processes associated with the CO2 fertilization effect remain uncertain and therefore are challenging to model.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine biogeochemical cycles</span>

Marine biogeochemical cycles are biogeochemical cycles that occur within marine environments, that is, in the saltwater of seas or oceans or the brackish water of coastal estuaries. These biogeochemical cycles are the pathways chemical substances and elements move through within the marine environment. In addition, substances and elements can be imported into or exported from the marine environment. These imports and exports can occur as exchanges with the atmosphere above, the ocean floor below, or as runoff from the land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FORMIND</span>

FORMIND is an individual based forest gap model that is able to simulate the growth of species-rich forests. It was developed in the late 1990s to simulate forest dynamics of tropical forests.

Philippe Ciais is a researcher of the Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), the climate change research unit of the Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (IPSL). He is a physicist working on the global carbon cycle of planet Earth, climate change, ecology and geosciences.

Dominique Bachelet is a senior climate change scientist and associate professor in Oregon State University, with over 38 years of education and work in the fields of climate change, fire, and ecology. She has worked to make science more accessible, by creating web based resources with various scientific organizations. She returned to Oregon State University in 2017 but has continued her outreach work, getting valuable information to students, scientists, and scholars.

References

  1. "Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project- Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling" (PDF). Global Biogeochamical Cucles. 9 (4): 407–437. December 1995.
  2. Cramer, Wolfgang; Bondeau, Alberte; Woodward, F. Ian; Prentice, I. Colin; Betts, Richard A.; Brovkin, Victor; Cox, Peter M.; Fisher, Veronica; Foley, Jonathan A.; Friend, Andrew D.; Kucharik, Chris; Lomas, Mark R.; Ramankutty, Navin; Sitch, Stephen; Smith, Benjamin (April 2001). "Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO 2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models: ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS, CO 2 and CLIMATE CHANGE". Global Change Biology. 7 (4): 357–373. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00383.x.
  3. "Vegetation-Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project". cgd.ucar.edu.
  4. Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC, Arneth A, Bondeau A, Cramer W, Kaplan JO, Levis S, Lucht W, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Venevsky S 2003. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ Dynamic Global Vegetation Model. Global Change Biology9, 161–185.
  5. "LPJ & LPJML Web Distribution Portal — PIK Research Portal". Archived from the original on 2010-12-13. Retrieved 2011-01-08.
  6. Foley, Jonathan A.; Prentice, I. Colin; Ramankutty, Navin; Levis, Samuel; Pollard, David; Sitch, Steven; Haxeltine, Alex (December 1996). "An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 10 (4): 603–628. doi:10.1029/96GB02692.
  7. Kucharik, Christopher J.; Foley, Jonathan A.; Delire, Christine; Fisher, Veronica A.; Coe, Michael T.; Lenters, John D.; Young-Molling, Christine; Ramankutty, Navin; Norman, John M.; Gower, Stith T. (September 2000). "Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 14 (3): 795–825. doi:10.1029/1999GB001138.
  8. "ORNL DAAC for Biogeochemical Dynamics". daac.ornl.gov. Retrieved 2023-09-07.
  9. Bachelet, Dominique; Lenihan, James M.; Daly, Christopher; Neilson, Ronald P.; Ojima, Dennis S.; Parton, William J. (2001). "MC1: a dynamic vegetation model for estimating the distribution of vegetation and associated carbon, nutrients, and water—technical documentation. Version 1.0". Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-508. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 95 p. 508. doi:10.2737/PNW-GTR-508.
  10. Daly, Christopher; Bachelet, Dominique; Lenihan, James M.; Neilson, Ronald P.; Parton, William; Ojima, Dennis (2000). "Dynamic Simulation of Tree-Grass Interactions for Global Change Studies". Ecological Applications. 10 (2): 449–469. doi:10.2307/2641106. ISSN   1051-0761.
  11. "MC1 Dynamic Vegetation Model". fsl.orst.edu/dgvm. 2018-06-20. Archived from the original on 2018-06-20. Retrieved 2023-09-07.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  12. Friend, A. D.; Stevens, A. K.; Knox, R. G.; Cannell, M. G. R. (1997-02-14). "A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v3.0)". Ecological Modelling. 95 (2): 249–287. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(96)00034-8. ISSN   0304-3800.
  13. Woodward, F. I.; Lomas, M. R.; Betts, R. A. (1998-01-29). Beerling, D. J.; Chaloner, W. G.; Woodward, F. I. (eds.). "Vegetation-climate feedbacks in a greenhouse world". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 353 (1365): 29–39. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0188. ISSN   0962-8436. PMC   1692170 .
  14. Sato, Hisashi. "Spatially Explicit Individual Based - Dynamic Global Vegetation Model". Yokohama Institute for Earth Sciences seib-dgvm.com. Retrieved 2023-09-07.
  15. "Hadley Centre: Carbon cycle models". www.metoffice.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 2001-08-22.
  16. Brovkin, Victor; Ganopolski, Andrei; Svirezhev, Yuri (1997-08-15). "A continuous climate-vegetation classification for use in climate-biosphere studies". Ecological Modelling. 101 (2): 251–261. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00049-5. hdl: 11858/00-001M-0000-0023-E605-4 . ISSN   0304-3800.
  17. Levis, Samuel; Bonan, Gordon; Vertenstein, Mariana; Oleson, Keith (2004). The Community Land Model's Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (CLM-DGVM): Technical description and user's guide (Report). UCAR/NCAR. pp. 1505 KB. doi:10.5065/d6p26w36.
  18. Moorcroft, P. R.; Hurtt, G. C.; Pacala, S. W. (November 2001). "A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED)". Ecological Monographs. 71 (4): 557–586. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0557:AMFSVD]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   0012-9615.
  19. Medvigy, D.; Wofsy, S. C.; Munger, J. W.; Hollinger, D. Y.; Moorcroft, P. R. (March 2009). "Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: Ecosystem Demography model version 2". Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 114 (G1). doi: 10.1029/2008JG000812 . ISSN   0148-0227.
  20. Zeng, Ning (September 2003). "Glacial-interglacial atmospheric CO2 change—The glacial burial hypothesis". Advances in Atmospheric Sciences. 20 (5): 677–693. Bibcode:2003AdAtS..20..677N. doi:10.1007/BF02915395. S2CID   15094502.
  21. "UMD Earth system model". atmos.umd.edu.
  22. "Community Climate System Model (CCSM) | Community Earth System Model". www.cesm.ucar.edu. Retrieved 2023-09-07.
  23. "French Global Land Surface Model - Home". Archived from the original on 2008-11-11. Retrieved 2008-11-23.
  24. "Joint UK Land Environment Simulator - JULES". www.jchmr.org. Archived from the original on 2007-02-02.
  25. "The Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM)". CLASSIC. 2019-06-03. Retrieved 2023-09-07.
  26. Farquhar, G. D.; von Caemmerer, S.; Berry, J. A. (1980). "A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species". Planta. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 149 (1): 78–90. doi:10.1007/bf00386231. ISSN   0032-0935.
  27. Collatz, GJ; Ribas-Carbo, M; Berry, JA (1992). "Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants". Functional Plant Biology. CSIRO Publishing. 19 (5): 519. doi:10.1071/pp9920519. ISSN   1445-4408.
  28. Collatz, G.James; Ball, J.Timothy; Grivet, Cyril; Berry, Joseph A (1991). "Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer". Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Elsevier BV. 54 (2–4): 107–136. doi:10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8. ISSN   0168-1923.
  29. "The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. The Royal Society. 273 (927): 593–610. 1976-02-26. doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0035. ISSN   0080-4622.
  30. Stewart, J.B (1988). "Modelling surface conductance of pine forest". Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Elsevier BV. 43 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1016/0168-1923(88)90003-2. ISSN   0168-1923.
  31. LEUNING, R. (1995). "A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants". Plant, Cell and Environment. Wiley. 18 (4): 339–355. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00370.x. ISSN   0140-7791.
  32. Haxeltine, A.; Prentice, I. C. (1996). "A General Model for the Light-Use Efficiency of Primary Production". Functional Ecology. [British Ecological Society, Wiley]. 10 (5): 551–561. ISSN   0269-8463. JSTOR   2390165 . Retrieved 2023-09-07.
  33. Cox, P.M; Huntingford, C; Harding, R.J (1998). "A canopy conductance and photosynthesis model for use in a GCM land surface scheme". Journal of Hydrology. Elsevier BV. 212–213: 79–94. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00203-0. ISSN   0022-1694.