Elizabeth Zechmeister

Last updated

Elizabeth Jean Zechmeister (born 1972) is an American political scientist and Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt University, noted for her research on comparative political behavior, public opinion, Latin American politics, and terrorism studies.

Contents

Education

Zechmeister earned her BA from Loyola University Chicago in 1994, her M.A. in Latin American Studies from University of Chicago in 1996, and her Ph.D. from Duke University in 2003. [1]

Career

Zechmeister held her first position as an assistant professor at University of California, Davis, in 2003 before joining the faculty at Vanderbilt University in the Department of Political Science in 2008. [2] [3] She became Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor of Political Science in 2018. [2] Zechmeister is director of the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP). [4] As Director, she oversees the AmericasBarometer, a comparative public opinion survey that covers 34 nations including all of North, Central, and South America and many Caribbean nations. The survey typically includes more than 40,000 interviews, and is the most expansive regional survey project in the Western Hemisphere. [5] Zechmeister is also a co-founder of the South-east Latin American Behavior Consortium (SELAB). [6]

Her research has been supported by the National Science Foundation, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Open Society Foundations, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and the Inter-American Development Bank, among others. [4] In 2012, she received the Vanderbilt A&S Jeffrey Nordhaus Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching and in 2015 she received the Vanderbilt Award for Excellence in Graduate Teaching. [4]

Zechmeister is Associate Editor of the Journal of Experimental Political Science [7] and an editorial board member of the following journals: Comparative Political Studies, [8] The Journal of Politics, [9] and Political Behavior. [10]

Research

Much of Zechmeister's research focuses on voting behavior in Latin America, the emergence of political parties, and the volatility of party systems in the region. On these topics, she co-authored (with Herbert Kitschelt, Kirk Hawkins, Juan Pablo Luna, and Guillermo Rosas) the book Latin American Party Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2010). [11] With Ryan Carlin and Matthew Singer, she also co-edited The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts (University of Michigan Press, 2015), which examines similar themes of political behavior and electoral volatility in Latin America. [12]

Zechmeister's early work questions how voters in new Latin American democracies understood ideological labels, for example in her dissertation “Sheep or Shepherds? Voter Behavior in New Democratic Contexts”. [13] She finds that meanings of "left” and “right” over the initial years of Mexican democracy contained references to valence issues and political actors that varied by individuals’ partisanships and political sophistication. “Left” labels grew ever more associated with the Partido de la Revolución Democrática and its interventionist social welfare message, while “right” labels tended to be defined by the Partido Acción Nacional (PAN) and its neoliberal and socially conservative message. In related work, she demonstrates that the Partido Revoluncionario Institucional’s (PRI) decades-long hegemony made location for other parties in the left-right ideological space challenging. [14] A second study in this vein "What's Left and Who's Right?" compared the usage of ideological labels in Mexico and Argentina. [15] This study largely confirmed her previous findings from Mexico in the Argentine case, and making the point that left-right label meanings vary by context depending on how elites discourse colors such labels. Subsequent solo scholarship (e.g., the chapter "Left-Right Identifications and the Latin American Voter" in The Latin American Voter) [16] and co-authored work with Margarita Corral [17] developed these themes more deeply with the use of region-wide survey data. The most novel methodological contribution across many of these works is that they employ Q methodology, an inductive approach to the study of human subjectivity developed in cognitive psychology, her work being one of the few applications of Q methodology in Political Science.

In recent years, Zechmeister has examined public opinion in the wake of natural disasters. Building off surveys conducted following the Chilean and Haitian earthquakes in 2010, Zechmeister explores in a set of papers the effect material damage and loss has on democratic attitudes and interpersonal trust. In a paper coauthored with Ryan Carlin and Gregory Love, she shows disaster victims in Chile often become less tolerant and supportive of democracy while also becoming more civically engaged. [18] In a second paper with Carlin and Love, Zechmeister finds that, contrary to much of the existing scholarship, disaster loss can reduce social capital, but only in low state-capacity environments. [19]

Zechmeister has also contributed to terrorism studies. In her book Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public (University of Chicago Press, 2009), co-authored with Jennifer Merolla, she examines how threats of terrorism affect public opinion. Using survey data from the United States and Mexico, Zechmeister and Merolla argue that terrorist threat leads to increased citizen support for domestic political leaders, making them appear more charismatic than they otherwise would, and leads to increased public support for restrictive domestic laws. [20]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political party</span> Organization coordinating policy priorities and candidates for government positions

A political party is an organization that coordinates candidates to compete in a particular country's elections. It is common for the members of a party to hold similar ideas about politics, and parties may promote specific ideological or policy goals.

Theories of political behavior, as an aspect of political science, attempt to quantify and explain the influences that define a person's political views, ideology, and levels of political participation. Political behavior is the subset of human behavior that involves politics and power. Theorists who have had an influence on this field include Karl Deutsch and Theodor Adorno.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Populism</span> Political philosophy

Populism refers to a range of political stances that emphasize the idea of "the people" and often juxtapose this group against "the elite". It is frequently associated with anti-establishment and anti-political sentiment. The term developed in the late 19th century and has been applied to various politicians, parties and movements since that time, often as a pejorative. Within political science and other social sciences, several different definitions of populism have been employed, with some scholars proposing that the term be rejected altogether.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter turnout</span> Percentage of a countrys eligible voters who actually vote within elections

In political science, voter turnout is the participation rate of a given election. This is typically either the percentage of registered voters, eligible voters, or all voting-age people. According to Stanford University political scientists Adam Bonica and Michael McFaul, there is a consensus among political scientists that "democracies perform better when more people vote."

Political polarization is the divergence of political attitudes away from the center, towards ideological extremes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theda Skocpol</span> American sociologist and political scientist (born 1947)

Theda Skocpol is an American sociologist and political scientist, who is currently the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. She is a highly influential figure in both sociology and political science. She is best known as an advocate of the historical-institutional and comparative approaches, as well as her "state autonomy theory". She has written widely for both popular and academic audiences. She has been President of the American Political Science Association and the Social Science History Association.

An independent voter, often also called an unaffiliated voter or non-affiliated voter in the United States, is a voter who does not align themselves with a political party. An independent is variously defined as a voter who votes for candidates on issues rather than on the basis of a political ideology or partisanship; a voter who does not have long-standing loyalty to, or identification with, a political party; a voter who does not usually vote for the same political party from election to election; or a voter who self-describes as an independent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Name recognition</span>

In politics, name recognition is the ability a voter has to identify a candidate's name due to a certain amount of previous exposure through various campaigning methods. It can be described as the awareness voters have about specific candidates resulting from various forms of campaign advertising. Some of the advertising methods used by candidates running for various offices are creating posters, making yard signs, bumper stickers and attempting to get media exposure, are a few examples of how they achieve this. Though candidates can achieve high name recognition and exposure, this does not necessarily mean that the average voter has a good understanding of their ideologies, positions and stances on political issues.

The LAPOP Lab is a research institute specializing in the development, implementation, and analysis of public opinion surveys. Founded by Mitchell A. Seligson over two decades ago, its principal focus is on governance and democracy in Latin America. The AmericasBarometer is the best-known survey produced by LAPOP. It is the most extensive survey of democratic public opinion and behavior that covers the Americas. It measures democratic values and behaviors using voter surveys. Elizabeth Zechmeister is the director of LAPOP. Noam Lupu is associate director of LAPOP.

Herbert P. Kitschelt is a political science scholar and George V. Allen Professor of International Relations at Duke University, North Carolina. Kitschelt's key intellectual contribution is arguably his redefinition of the competitive space for political parties in Western Europe. Kitschelt claims that the traditional patterns along which parties competed had progressively shifted to a new pattern of political division: left-libertarian versus right-authoritarian as a result of social changes in advanced capitalist societies. He was also one of the first scholars to systematically study the rise of Green parties in Europe, which he understood as a form of 'left-libertarian' politics.

Myron Kent Jennings is an American political scientist best known for his path-breaking work on the patterns and development of political preferences and behaviors among young Americans. He is widely held in libraries worldwide and is recognized as one of the "founding fathers" of political socialization research and theory. He is Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Santa Barbara and Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Michigan. He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1982, and served as the president of the International Society of Political Psychology in 1989–1990 and as the president of the American Political Science Association in 1997–1998.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparative Study of Electoral Systems</span> Collaborative research project

The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) is a collaborative research project among national election studies around the world. Participating countries and polities include a common module of survey questions in their national post-election studies. The resulting data are collated together along with voting, demographic, district and macro variables into one dataset allowing comparative analysis of voting behavior from a multilevel perspective.

Susan Carol Stokes is an American political scientist and the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor in the Political Science department of the University of Chicago, and the faculty director of the Chicago Center on Democracy. Her academic focus is on Latin American politics, comparative politics, and how democracies function in developing countries. Stokes is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She was elected a member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2022.

Negative partisanship is the tendency of some voters to form their political opinions primarily in opposition to political parties they dislike. Whereas traditional partisanship involves supporting the policy positions of one's own party, its negative counterpart in turn means opposing those positions of a disliked party. It has been claimed to be the cause of severe polarization in American politics. It has also been studied in the Canadian context, as well as in Australia and New Zealand. Cross-national studies indicate that negative partisanship undermines public satisfaction with democracy, which threatens democratic stability. Traditional partisans, on the other hand, are more likely to support their country's democracy, which promotes democratic stability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evelyne Huber</span> American political scientist

Evelyne Huber is an American and Swiss political scientist specializing in comparative politics and a scholar of Latin America, currently the Morehead Alumni Professor of Political Science at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, where she was the Department Chair for more than a decade. Her work has focused on democracy and redistribution, particularly in Latin America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political polarization in the United States</span> Divisions among people with different political ideologies in the United States

Political polarization is a prominent component of politics in the United States. Scholars distinguish between ideological polarization and affective polarization, both of which are apparent in the United States. In the last few decades, the U.S. has experienced a greater surge in ideological polarization and affective polarization than comparable democracies.

Karen L. Remmer is an American political scientist, academic, author and researcher. She is a professor emerita of political science at Duke University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Randy Stevenson</span> American political scientist

Randolph T. Stevenson is an American political scientist and professor at Rice University in Houston, Texas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jennie Stephens</span>

Jennie C. Stephens is an academic researcher, professor, author, and social justice advocate. She is Professor of Sustainability Science & Policy at Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts. She is also affiliated with the Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies Program, the department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and the department of Cultures, Societies & Global Studies.

References

  1. ↑ "Profile". Department of Political Science. Retrieved 2018-09-19.
  2. 1 2 "Profile". Department of Political Science. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
  3. ↑ "Elizabeth J. Zechmeister | Vanderbilt University". my.vanderbilt.edu. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
  4. 1 2 3 "Profile". Department of Political Science. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
  5. ↑ "Index". LAPOP. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
  6. ↑ "Executive Committee". Southeast Latin American Behavior Consortium. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
  7. ↑ "Editorial board". Cambridge Core. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
  8. ↑ "Comparative Political Studies". SAGE Publications Inc. 2015-10-28. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
  9. ↑ "The Journal of Politics: Editorial Board". www.journals.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
  10. ↑ "Political Behavior (Editorial Board)". springer.com. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
  11. ↑ Kitschelt, Herbert; Hawkins, Kirk A.; Luna, Juan Pablo; Rosas, Guillermo; Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. (2009). Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511750311. ISBN   9780511750311.
  12. ↑ Carlin, Ryan E.; Singer, Matthew M.; Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. (2015). The Latin American voter : pursuing representation and accountability in challenging contexts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. ISBN   9780472052875.
  13. ↑ Zechmeister, Elizabeth Jean (2003). Sheep or shepherds?: voter behavior in new democratic contexts (Thesis). OCLC   55951514.
  14. ↑ Zechmeister, Elizabeth (2006). "Qué es la izquierda y quién está a la derecha en la política mexicana. Un enfoque con el método Q al estudio de las etiquetas ideológicas". Política y Gobierno. XIII (1). ISSN   1665-2037.
  15. ↑ Zechmeister, Elizabeth (June 2006). "What's Left and Who's Right? A Q-method Study of Individual and Contextual Influences on the Meaning of Ideological Labels". Political Behavior. 28 (2): 151–173. doi:10.1007/s11109-006-9006-5. ISSN   0190-9320. S2CID   144588319.
  16. ↑ Carlin, Ryan E.; Singer, Matthew M.; Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. (2015-07-21). The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. University of Michigan Press. ISBN   9780472121434.
  17. ↑ Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.; Corral, Margarita (2013-06-01). "Individual and Contextual Constraints on Ideological Labels in Latin America". Comparative Political Studies. 46 (6): 675–701. doi:10.1177/0010414012463880. ISSN   0010-4140. S2CID   146997280.
  18. ↑ Carlin, Ryan E.; Love, Gregory J.; Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. (2013-07-17). "Natural Disaster and Democratic Legitimacy". Political Research Quarterly. 67 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1177/1065912913495592. ISSN   1065-9129. S2CID   154407185.
  19. ↑ Carlin, Ryan E.; Love, Gregory J.; Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. (2014-07-01). "Trust Shaken: Earthquake Damage, State Capacity, and Interpersonal Trust in Comparative Perspective". Comparative Politics. 46 (4): 419–453. doi:10.5129/001041514812522761. ISSN   0010-4159.
  20. ↑ Merolla, Jennifer L.; Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. (2009). Democracy at risk : how terrorist threats affect the public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN   9780226520544.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.