Family Justice System of England and Wales

Last updated

The Family Justice System of England and Wales is a branch of the Courts of England and Wales that deals with disputes within families through Family law. [1] Disputes are resolved in the family magistrates court and in the Family Division of the High Court. [2] The matters considered by the court include those arising from marriage, divorce, financial payments following divorce, protection from domestic abuse and the risk of domestic abuse, child custody matters, adoption cases, cases surrounding artificial insemination, and the medical treatment of children. [3]

Contents

Legislation creates some obligations of the state to children, disputes involving such matters aare dealt with by public family law. [4]

In 2021, 265,308 cases entered the family court system. There were 38,528 domestic violence orders and 1,054 adoption applications. [5]

History

Prior to the Guardianship of Infants Act 1925 in the case of divorce to married parents the father of a child was given custody over a child. The guardianship act gave courts the ability to rule on some disputes about the upbringing of a child. [6] :4 The Legitimacy Act 1959 gave courts the ability to rule on children born to unmarried parents. The Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1958 required all divorcing parents to file a statement of arrangements for the upbringing of a child which a court approved. [6] :5The foundation of current family law in England and Wales was the Children Act 1989. [7] :40 The Children Act introduced a no order principle, where no order will be made unless it improves the welfare of a child. [6] :11

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, LASPO, reduced funding for family courts. An earlier report in 2010 had argued that legal aid funding lead to drawn out cases. By April 2017 the number of cases where both parties did not have legal representation had increased to 36% from 19% in 2013. [8] :139

Transparency

Courts in England and Wales have a principle of open justice where hearings are held in public but family courts are held in private because it has been felt that this protects children. Concerns have been expressed in some sections of the media about a lack of accountability in the family courts. [9] :8 Some members of the Judiciary called for more people to have access to family courts. Certain judgments from the family are made public with some being available on BAILII. [9] :9

Litigants in person

Legal aid is generally not available for decisions involving child arrangements, which leads to parents representing themselves in court. [8] :139 Ligitants representing themselves cause delays in cases when compared to those who are represented by a lawyer. [8] :139 There are examples of the judiciary having to research law itself because the litigant does not present complex legal arguments well. [8] :143 There are cases where the behaviour of a litigator representing themselves in an emotional charged setting have led judges to make negative conclusions about themselves relevant to the case. [8] :139

Legal aid is available for those who make accusations of domestic abuse or child abuse but not for those accused of said abuse. [8] :139 Parents for whom there is no evidence of abuse are able to apply to the court for a non-molestation order and use this as evidence for obtaining legal aid and are able to apply for means-tested legal aid to apply for this non-molestation order. Protective injunctions such as a non-molestation are the most common evidence given for domestic abuse. Individuals are able to apply for non-molestation orders without informing the party to whom the order applies and those responding to the order do not have access to legal aid. [8] :146

Use of expert witnesses and research

In research internationally, scholars express fear about the misuse of social science literature as evidence in trials. [10] :186 Scholars argue that research may be used selectively to support arguments specific to a case and lawyers may lack the knowledge to cross-examine researchers. Some Judges were found to distrust evidence given working for local authorities and there were concerns about the lack of expertise. [10] :189

A scoping review in 2016 looked at attitudes to research in courts. Judges would try to keep up with social science research in general terms but would not introduce such evidence themselves to court relying on the advocates in the case to do so. [10] :191 Judges and lawyers are concerned about how authoritative research is and whether it includes a consideration of contradictory research. There is concern that research commissioned by Government Departments may be biased. [10] :194

In 2021, the President of the Family Division issued a memorandum regarding the criteria for use of expert witnesses citing Kennedy v Cordia (Services) LLP (Scotland). The criteria included expertise that will assist the court, impartiality, that the expert be necessary for the proceedings, and certain criteria surrounding bodies of knowledge. The memorandum states that the court will refuse to accept evidence where the methodology is not based on established body of knowledge. [11] [12]

Parental alienation

In 2017 and 2018 petitions were arranged by pressure groups calling for the legislatures of England and Wales to recognise parental alienation, where one parent attempts to cause a child have negative feelings towards their other parent. [13] :69 The Welsh branch CAFCASS, commissioned an independent literature review. While parental alienation is distinguished from cases where a parents own action causes a child to dislike them such as poor parenting or domestic abuse, researchers have found that claims of parental alienation and domestic abuse can occur at the same time. [13] :71 The research on parental alienation was found to often use self-report and retrospective reviews making identifying causality difficult and while there are various measures for parental alienation none were considered reliable by the review. [13] :73 Some barristers have claimed that parental alienation is used as a counter-allegation in response to claims of domestic abuse. [14]

In October 2022, an appeal to be heard by Andrew McFarlane was brought about the necessary credentials of expert witness giving evidence on parental alienation following an expert witness who had no psychological qualifications giving evidence. This witness had been accepted by both parties in the case. [12]

Related Research Articles

Family law is an area of the law that deals with family matters and domestic relations.

Divorce is the process of terminating a marriage or marital union. Divorce usually entails the canceling or reorganizing of the legal duties and responsibilities of marriage, thus dissolving the bonds of matrimony between a married couple under the rule of law of the particular country or state. It can be said to be a legal dissolution of a marriage by a court or other competent body. It is the legal process of ending a marriage.

Child custody, conservatorship and guardianship describe the legal and practical relationship between a parent and the parent's child, such as the right of the parent to make decisions for the child, and the parent's duty to care for the child.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fathers' rights movement in the United Kingdom</span>

The fathers' rights movement in the United Kingdom consists of a large number of diverse pressure groups, ranging from charities and self-help groups to civil disobedience activists in the United Kingdom, who started to obtain wide publicity in 2003. Studies show the majority of the UK population support the need for change and protection of fathers rights to meet the responsibility through 50:50 contact. The movement's origin can be traced to 1974 when Families Need Fathers (FNF) was founded. At the local level, many activists spend much time providing support for newly separated fathers, most of whom are highly distraught. Although some have been accused of being sexist by some commentators, these groups also campaign for better treatment for excluded mothers, women in second marriages, other step-parents and grandparents – all of whom suffer discrimination in respect of contact with their (grand) child(ren).

Parental alienation is a theorized process through which a child becomes estranged from one parent as the result of the psychological manipulation of another parent. The child's estrangement may manifest itself as fear, disrespect or hostility toward the distant parent, and may extend to additional relatives or parties. The child's estrangement is disproportionate to any acts or conduct attributable to the alienated parent. Parental alienation can occur in any family unit, but is claimed to occur most often within the context of family separation, particularly when legal proceedings are involved, although the participation of professionals such as lawyers, judges and psychologists may also contribute to conflict.

Parental alienation syndrome (PAS) is a term introduced by child psychiatrist Richard Gardner in 1985 to describe signs and symptoms he believed to be exhibited by children who have been alienated from one parent through manipulation by the other parent. Proposed symptoms included extreme but unwarranted fear, and disrespect or hostility towards a parent. Gardner believed that a set of behaviors that he observed in some families involved in child custody litigation could be used to diagnose psychological manipulation or undue influence of a child by a parent, typically by the other parent who may be attempting to prevent an ongoing relationship between a child and other family members after family separation or divorce. Use of the term "syndrome" has not been accepted by either the medical or legal communities and Gardner's research has been broadly criticized by legal and mental health scholars for lacking scientific validity and reliability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction</span> 1980 multilateral treaty

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction or Hague Abduction Convention is a multilateral treaty that provides an expeditious method to return a child who was wrongfully taken by a parent from one country to another country. In order for the Convention to apply, both countries must be “Contracting States”, i.e. both must have adopted the Convention.

Richard Alan Gardner was an American child psychiatrist known for his work in psychotherapy with children, parental alienation and child custody evaluations. Based on his clinical work with children and families, Gardner introduced the term parental alienation syndrome (PAS), which is now "largely rejected by most credible professionals". He wrote 41 books and more than 200 journal articles and book chapters. He developed child play therapy and test materials that he published through his company Creative Therapeutics. Gardner was an expert witness in child custody cases.

Child custody is a legal term regarding guardianship which is used to describe the legal and practical relationship between a parent or guardian and a child in that person's care. Child custody consists of legal custody, which is the right to make decisions about the child, and physical custody, which is the right and duty to house, provide and care for the child. Married parents normally have joint legal and physical custody of their children. Decisions about child custody typically arise in proceedings involving divorce, annulment, separation, adoption or parental death. In most jurisdictions child custody is determined in accordance with the best interests of the child standard.

In family law, contact, visitation and access are synonym terms that denotes the time that a child spends with the noncustodial parent, according to an agreed or court specified parenting schedule. The visitation term is not used in a shared parenting arrangement where both parents have joint physical custody.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family proceedings court</span> Magistrates court when the courts family panel sat to hear a family case, up to 2014

In England and Wales, family proceedings court was the name given to a magistrates' court when members of the court's family panel sat to hear a family case. It was a court of first instance in England and Wales that dealt with family matters. Cases were either heard in front of a bench of lay magistrates or a district judge.

The fathers' rights movement has simultaneously evolved in many countries, advocating for shared parenting after divorce or separation, and the right of children and fathers to have close and meaningful relationships. This article provides details about the fathers' rights movement in specific countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International child abduction in Brazil</span>

International child abduction in Brazil comprises cases in which the removal of a child by one of the joint holders of custody or non-custodial or contested parents to Brazil in contravention of other laws of other countries and/or the desires of other custody claimants. The phenomenon of international child abduction is defined in international law and legislated on by the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which entered into force in Brazil on January 1, 2000, and aims to trace abducted children, secure their prompt return to the country of habitual residence and organize or secure effective rights of access. In 2010 Brazil was accused by the US State Department of being non-compliant with the Hague Convention.

A parenting coordinator (PC) is a court-appointed professional psychologist or lawyer who manages ongoing issues in high-conflict child custody and visitation cases.

A contact centre is a neutral place where children of separated families can enjoy contact with their non-resident parents and sometimes other family members, in a comfortable and safe environment. Child contact services are classified into two distinct categories, supported and supervised. Its primary role is to support and promote contact between those parents, grandparents, guardians and children that do not have a Residence Order.

Forced adoption is the practice of removing children permanently from their parents and the subsequent adoption of those children, following intervention by the Children's Services department of a Local Authority in the United Kingdom.

Domestic violence and abuse in the United Kingdom are a range of abusive behaviours that occur within relationships. Domestic violence or abuse can be physical, psychological, sexual, financial or emotional. In UK laws and legislation, the term "domestic abuse" is commonly used to encompass various forms of domestic violence. Some specific forms of domestic violence and abuse are criminal offences. Victims or those at risk of domestic abuse can also be provided with remedies and protection via civil law.

Minnie Gonzalez is an American politician who has been a member of the Connecticut House of Representatives since 1997, serving the 3rd district in Hartford. She is the Deputy Majority Leader since 2017.

Edward Kruk is a Canadian sociologist and social worker. He has conducted internationally recognized research on child custody, shared parenting, family mediation, divorced fathers, parental alienation, parental addiction, child protection, and grandparent access to their grandchildren. Kruk is an associate professor of social work at the University of British Columbia. He is the founding president of the International Council on Shared Parenting.

Emma Katz is a UK-based domestic violence researcher. Katz has contributed to policy and popular cultural discussion on coercive control, in particular in the UK, the United States, and Australia.

References

  1. "Family Justice System". Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. Retrieved 2022-11-27.
  2. "Family Judges". Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. Retrieved 2022-11-27.
  3. "Types of Family Cases". Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. Retrieved 2022-11-27.
  4. Garrison, Marsha (2022-10-28). Family Life, Family Law, and Family Justice: Tying the Knot. Taylor & Francis. ISBN   978-1-000-77794-9.
  5. "Family Court Statistics Quarterly: October to December 2021". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2022-12-03.
  6. 1 2 3 MacFarlane, Andrew. "When families fall apart, do they fall too easily into court? a Speech" (PDF). Judiciary of England and Wales.
  7. Family Justice Review Final Report (PDF). 2011.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Richardson, Kayliegh Leanne; Speed, Ana Kate (2019-04-03). "Restrictions on legal aid in family law cases in England and Wales: creating a necessary barrier to public funding or simply increasing the burden on the family courts?". Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 41 (2): 135–152. doi:10.1080/09649069.2019.1590898. ISSN   0964-9069. S2CID   149709317.
  9. 1 2 "Publishing and Reporting on Court Judgments", Transparency in the Family Courts: Publicity and Privacy in Practice, Bloomsbury Professional, 2018, doi:10.5040/9781526503886.ch-004, ISBN   978-1-52650-385-5 , retrieved 2022-11-28
  10. 1 2 3 4 Robertson, Laura; Broadhurst, Karen (2019-08-01). "Introducing Social Science Evidence in Family Court Decision-Making and Adjudication: Evidence from England and Wales". International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 33 (2): 181–203. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebz002 . hdl: 20.500.11820/25ed8c21-cde4-4bca-be80-19583e1ff764 . ISSN   1360-9939.
  11. "President's Memorandum: Experts in the Family Court" (PDF). Judiciary of England and Wales.
  12. 1 2 "Senior high court judge to address issues in 'parental alienation' cases". the Guardian. 2022-10-10. Retrieved 2022-11-29.
  13. 1 2 3 Doughty, Julie; Maxwell, Nina; Slater, Tom (2020-01-02). "Professional responses to 'parental alienation': research-informed practice". Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 42 (1): 68–79. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1701938. ISSN   0964-9069. S2CID   213328267.
  14. "Parental alienation and the unregulated experts shattering children's lives". the Guardian. 2022-06-12. Retrieved 2022-11-28.