Good moral character

Last updated

Good moral character is an ideal state of a person's beliefs and values that is considered most beneficial to society. [1] [2]

Contents

In United States law, good moral character can be assessed through the requirement of virtuous acts or by principally evaluating negative conduct. [3] [4] [5] Whether the assessment of good moral character depends more on the evaluator or the assessee has been the subject of significant debate, and a consensus has not been reached between scholars, [6] jurists, courts, administrative agencies, and legislators. [7] Legal judgments of good moral character can include consideration of honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, reliability, respect for the law, integrity, candor, discretion, observance of fiduciary duty, respect for the rights of others, absence of hatred and discrimination, fiscal responsibility, mental and emotional stability, profession-specific criteria such as pledging to honor the Constitution and uphold the law, and the absence of a criminal conviction. [8] Since the moral character of a person is an intrinsic psychological characteristic and cannot be measured directly, [9] some scholars and statutes have used the phrase "behaved as a person of good moral character". [10]

People must have good moral character determined as a fact of law in predominately two contexts – (1) state-issued licensure that allows one to work and practice a regulated profession [11] and (2) federal government-issued U.S. citizenship certificates whereby an immigrant undergoes naturalization to become a citizen. Many laws create a paradox by placing the burden of proof of good moral character on the applicant while such a proof, but not the law, necessitates that the evaluators assess the beliefs and values of the applicant. [12]

Good moral character is the opposite of moral turpitude, another legal concept in the United States used in similar instances.

Assessments

Good moral character is usually considered to be present when a person has several positive moral findings and has no-to-minimal negative moral findings. Positive evidence of good moral character can include letters of recommendation, pursuing education, working six days a week, owning one's home, attending church every Sunday, marrying one's high-school sweetheart, having strong ties to one's nuclear family, coaching little league teams, paying taxes, paying bills on time, and volunteering in the community. [13]

Moral luck might influence the assessments of moral character. If one volunteers to help others, they may be considered a better person if something bad, uncontrollable, and unexpected happens to them while they are working. For example, a man who is stung by a bee while mowing the lawn for an elderly neighbor is often rated as having a better moral character than a similar man who is not stung by a bee. [14]

Negative findings of moral character can include a single legal citation, working for a marijuana farm or dispensary, [15] having children without being married, not paying taxes, dishonesty, receiving government support, and advocating for racism. [16] According to some moral character assessors, virtually all crimes such as city ordinance violations, misdemeanors, as well as felonies are considered to be de facto evidence that a person does not have good moral character. However, many states exclude minor traffic violations as part of a person's character assessment. The presence of any negative finding can outweigh several positive findings.

In immigration law

Even minor violations of the law can be the sole reason for denying citizenship. [17] The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services describes "good moral character" as an absence of involvement in the following activities: [18]

Additionally, several other prior activities can disqualify a person from having a current "good moral character" [20]

In employment

Teachers, executioners, [21] nurses, physicians, attorneys, barbers, liquor salespersons, pharmacists, and many other professionals require a state-issued license to perform their job. [22] [23] [24] In order to obtain a license to work, one must meet the regular non-moral requirements such as years of education and also convince the state board that the applicant has good moral character. However, the criteria used to determine good moral character can vary significantly. [25] [26] [27] Background checks are a type of verification of good moral character and they are often accompanied by drug testing. For admission to the bar in the United States, lawyers must go through extensive moral character checks as part of the application process. [28]

On May 14, 2019, Oklahoma enacted a law to remove the good moral character clauses from their licensure requirements and implemented more objective standards. [29] In 2019, Mississippi enacted legislation to limit the use of "vague" terms such as "moral turpitude" and "good character" by state agencies. [30]

In medicine

A 1975 survey by Camenisch included responses from 19 state medical board presidents (respondents) wherein they placed eight characteristics of good moral character in order of importance from most to least.

They were (in ranked order):

  1. readiness to abide by laws governing medical practice (e.g., abortion and drug laws);
  2. willingness to abide by moral demands of doctor-patient relationship (e.g., to observe confidentiality);
  3. ranking patient's well-being as his highest goal in his practice of medicine;
  4. willingness to abide by professional etiquette (e.g., not to advertise);
  5. dedication to delivering the highest quality of medical care he and the science are capable of;
  6. dedication to enhancing public health through preventative as well as curative measures;
  7. dedication to seeing that all needing medical care get it under conditions they can meet without hardship; and
  8. preference for the traditional fee-for-service mode of practice.

Camenisch writes, "The grouping of the eight elements in the order of importance makes it clear that 'good moral character' in the minds of the respondents emphatically has more to do with the professional's obligations to a limited number of specific individuals, to his patients, than to the society at large, to the entire population of those needing health care... this second area ... includes such matters as the distribution of health care and the mode and ease of patient access to it. ... this low ranking of societal issues and responsibilities is of special interest in light of the fact that these same respondents, when asked to indicate the major differences between professional and other occupational licensing, gave highest place to 'the degree of dedication to the public well-being expected of the licensee.'" [31]

Related Research Articles

A felony is traditionally considered a crime of high seriousness, whereas a misdemeanor is regarded as less serious. The term "felony" originated from English common law to describe an offense that resulted in the confiscation of a convicted person's land and goods, to which additional punishments including capital punishment could be added; other crimes were called misdemeanors. Following conviction of a felony in a court of law, a person may be described as a felon or a convicted felon.

A misdemeanor is any "lesser" criminal act in some common law legal systems. Misdemeanors are generally punished less severely than more serious felonies, but theoretically more so than administrative infractions and regulatory offences. Typically, misdemeanors are punished with prison time of no longer than one year, monetary fines, or community service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Naturalization</span> Process by which a non-national in a country acquires after birth the nationality of that country

Naturalization is the legal act or process by which a non-national of a country acquires the nationality of that country after birth. The definition of naturalization by the International Organization for Migration of the United Nations excludes citizenship that is automatically acquired or is acquired by declaration. Naturalization usually involves an application or a motion and approval by legal authorities. The rules of naturalization vary from country to country but typically include a promise to obey and uphold that country's laws and taking and subscribing to an oath of allegiance, and may specify other requirements such as a minimum legal residency and adequate knowledge of the national dominant language or culture. To counter multiple citizenship, some countries require that applicants for naturalization renounce any other citizenship that they currently hold, but whether this renunciation actually causes loss of original citizenship, as seen by the host country and by the original country, will depend on the laws of the countries involved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green card</span> Lawful permanent residency in the United States

A green card, known officially as a permanent resident card, is an identity document which shows that a person has permanent residency in the United States. Green card holders are formally known as lawful permanent residents (LPRs). As of 2019, there are an estimated 13.9 million green card holders, of whom 9.1 million are eligible to become United States citizens. Approximately 18,700 of them serve in the U.S. Armed Forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952</span> American immigration law

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran–Walter Act, codified under Title 8 of the United States Code, governs immigration to and citizenship in the United States. It came into effect on June 27, 1952. The legislation consolidated various immigration laws into a single text. Officially titled the Immigration and Nationality Act, it is often referred to as the 1952 law to distinguish it from the 1965 legislation. This law increased the quota for Europeans outside Northern and Western Europe, gave the Department of State authority to reject entries affecting native wages, eliminated 1880s bans on contract labor, set a minimum quota of one hundred visas per country, and promoted family reunification by exempting citizens' children and spouses from numerical caps.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996</span> Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 Key Provisions

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 made major changes to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). IIRIRA's changes became effective on April 1, 1997.

An Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility is an application for legal entry to the United States made by an individual who is otherwise inadmissible on one or more grounds. The application is submitted to the consular office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office or immigration court considering the immigrant visa or adjustment of status application.

A K-1 visa is a visa issued to the fiancé or fiancée of a United States citizen to enter the United States. A K-1 visa requires a foreigner to marry his or her U.S. citizen petitioner within 90 days of entry, or depart the United States. Once the couple marries, the foreign citizen can adjust status to become a lawful permanent resident of the United States. Although a K-1 visa is legally classified as a non-immigrant visa, it usually leads to important immigration benefits and is therefore often processed by the Immigrant Visa section of United States embassies and consulates worldwide.

Collateral consequences of criminal conviction are the additional civil state penalties, mandated by statute, that attach to a criminal conviction. They are not part of the direct consequences of criminal conviction, such as prison, fines, or probation. They are the further civil actions by the state that are triggered as a consequence of the conviction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philippine nationality law</span> History and regulations of Philippine citizenship

Philippine nationality law details the conditions by which a person is a national of the Philippines. The two primary pieces of legislation governing these requirements are the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines and the 1939 Revised Naturalization Law.

Moral turpitude is a legal concept in the United States and until 1976 in Canada that refers to "an act or behavior that gravely violates the sentiment or accepted standard of the community". This term appears in U.S. immigration law beginning in the 19th century. Moral turpitude laws typically deal with legal, judicial, and business related transgressions. Moral turpitude laws should not be confused with laws regarding social morality, those are more commonly called under the names of public order crimes, morality & decency laws, and vice crimes.

The term aggravated felony was used in the United States immigration law to refer to a broad category of criminal offenses that carry certain severe consequences for aliens seeking asylum, legal permanent resident status, citizenship, or avoidance of deportation proceedings. Anyone convicted of an aggravated felony and removed from the United States "must remain outside of the United States for twenty consecutive years from the deportation date before he or she is eligible to re-enter the United States." The supreme court ruled 5-4 in Sessions v. Dimaya that the residual clause was unconstitutionally vague limiting the term.

The Security Through Regularized Immigration and a Vibrant Economy Act of 2007 or STRIVE Act of 2007 is proposed United States legislation designed to address the problem of illegal immigration, introduced into the United States House of Representatives. Its supporters claim it would toughen border security, increase enforcement of and criminal penalties for illegal immigration, and establish an employment verification system to identify illegal aliens working in the United States. It would also establish new programs for both illegal aliens and new immigrant workers to achieve legal citizenship. Critics allege that the bill would turn law enforcement agencies into social welfare agencies as it would not allow CBP to detain illegal immigrants that are eligible for Z-visas and would grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens with very few restrictions.

A deferred adjudication, also known in some jurisdictions as an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (ACOD), probation before judgment (PBJ), or deferred entry of judgment (DEJ), is a form of plea deal available in various jurisdictions, where a defendant pleads "guilty" or "no contest" to criminal charges in exchange for meeting certain requirements laid out by the court within an allotted period of time also ordered by the court. Upon completion of the requirements, which may include probation, treatment, community service, some form of community supervision, or some other diversion program, the defendant may avoid a formal conviction on their record or have their case dismissed. In some cases, an order of non-disclosure can be obtained, and sometimes a record can be expunged.

Employment discrimination against persons with criminal records in the United States has been illegal since enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Employers retain the right to lawfully consider an applicant's or employee's criminal conviction(s) for employment purposes e.g., hiring, retention, promotion, benefits, and delegated duties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Utah</span> Utahs gun law

Gun laws in Utah regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the state of Utah in the United States.

Expungement in the United States is a process which varies across jurisdictions. Many states allow for criminal records to be sealed or expunged, although laws vary by state. Some states do not permit expungement, or allow expungement under very limited circumstances. In general, once sealed or expunged, all records of an arrest and of any subsequent court proceedings are removed from the public record, and the individual may legally deny or fail to acknowledge ever having been arrested for or charged with any crime which has been expunged.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Passports Act</span>

The Passports Act is an act of the Parliament of India "for the issue of passports and travel documents, to regulate the departure from India of citizens of India and for other persons and for matters incidental or ancillary thereto." The Act applies to whole of India extending to citizens of India living outside the country. The Act replaced the Indian Passport Ordinance 1967 and was enacted by Act 15 of 1967 with retrospective effect from 5 May 1967. The act describes the procedures in getting an Indian passport, which replaced the British Indian passport and The Passport Act of 1920.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emirati nationality law</span> History and regulations of Emirati citizenship

Emirati nationality law governs citizenship eligibility in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The law is primarily jus sanguinis. Foreigners who meet certain criteria may be naturalized and granted citizenship. Gulf Cooperation Council citizens are allowed to live in the UAE without restriction and have the right of freedom of movement.

Pereida v. Wilkinson, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) an alien seeking to cancel a lawful removal order bears the burden of showing that he has not been convicted of a disqualifying offense. An alien has not carried that burden when the record shows he has been convicted under a statute limiting multiple offenses, some of which are disqualifying, and the record is ambiguous as to which crime formed the basis of his conviction.

References

  1. ↑ Nicomachean Ethics (PDF).
  2. ↑ Roy F. Baumeister (2018). Graham, Jesse; Gray, Kurt James (eds.). Atlas of moral psychology. New York: The Guilford Press. p. 334. ISBN   9781462532568. OCLC   1019835254.
  3. ↑ "In re Alpert, 269 Ore. 508, at 518 (1974)".
  4. ↑ "In Re Applicants for License, 131 S.E. 661, 191 N.C. 235 – CourtListener.com". CourtListener.
  5. ↑ "Good Moral Character [Contract] Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc". definitions.uslegal.com.
  6. ↑ Rhode, Deborah L. (27 December 2018). "Virtue and the Law: The Good Moral Character Requirement in Occupational Licensing, Bar Regulation, and Immigration Proceedings". Law & Social Inquiry. 43 (3): 1027–1058. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12332 .
  7. ↑ Keith, Swisher (2012). "The Troubling Rise of the Legal Profession's Good Moral Character". St. John's Law Review. 82 (3).
  8. ↑ Theresa, Keeley (2004). "Good Moral Character: Already an Unconstitutionally Vague Concept and Now Putting Bar Applicants in a Post-9/11 World on an Elevated Threat Level". University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. 6 (4). ISSN   1521-2823.
  9. ↑ Anderson, Barrett J. (2012). "Recognizing Character: A New Perspective on Character Evidence". The Yale Law Journal. 121 (7): 1912–1968. JSTOR   41510461.
  10. ↑ "Aliens guilty of crime here and pardoned not entitled to naturalization". The Albany Law Journal: 153–155. 1878.
  11. ↑ Craddock, Larry. ""Good Moral Character" As A Licensing Standard". www.texasbarcle.com.
  12. ↑ Cohen, Taya R.; Morse, Lily (2014). "Moral character: What it is and what it does". Research in Organizational Behavior. 34: 43–61. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.08.003. S2CID   144722348.
  13. ↑ Mendelson, Margot K. (2010). "Constructing America: Mythmaking in U.S. Immigration Courts". The Yale Law Journal. 119 (5): 1012–1058. JSTOR   20698316.
  14. ↑ Schaumberg, Rebecca L.; Mullen, Elizabeth (1 November 2017). "From incidental harms to moral elevation: The positive effect of experiencing unintentional, uncontrollable, and unavoidable harms on perceived moral character". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 73: 86–96. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.016. ISSN   0022-1031.
  15. ↑ U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (April 19, 2019). "Policy Alert 2019-02; Controlled Substance Related Activity and Good Moral Character Determinations" (PDF).
  16. ↑ Billy, Jason (2006). "Confronting Racists at the Bar: Matthew Hale, Moral Character, and Regulating the Marketplace of Ideas". Harvard Blackletter Law Journal. 22.
  17. ↑ http://www.seattlepi.com/local/172675_suit10.html One mistake robs man of citizenship
  18. ↑ "What is good moral character?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-11-27. Retrieved 2007-11-18.
  19. ↑ http://www.americanlaw.com/exclude3.html Aliens who have been convicted of, or who admit to having committed, or who admit to committing acts which constitute the essential elements of a crime involving moral turpitude, other than purely political offenses are excludable under INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I).
  20. ↑ Lapp, Kevin (2012). "Reforming the Good Moral Character Requirement for U.S. Citizenship". Indiana Law Journal. 87 (4). Retrieved 28 May 2018.
  21. ↑ Bastians, Dharisha; Victor, Daniel (15 February 2019). "Sri Lanka Seeks Executioner With 'Excellent Moral Character'". The New York Times.
  22. ↑ "Opinion, Trump Hotel keeps its liquor license — and that's as it should be". Washington Post. Retrieved 18 September 2018.
  23. ↑ Rhode, Deborah L. (1985). "Moral Character as a Professional Credential". The Yale Law Journal. 94 (3): 491–603. doi:10.2307/796236. JSTOR   796236.
  24. ↑ L., Baude, Patrick (1993). "An Essay on the Regulation of the Legal Profession and the Future of Lawyer's Characters". Indiana Law Journal. 68 (3). ISSN   0019-6665.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. ↑ Vranas, Peter B. M. (10 June 2009). "Against Moral Character Evaluations: The Undetectability of Virtue and Vice". The Journal of Ethics. 13 (2–3): 213–233. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.405.5757 . doi:10.1007/s10892-009-9049-z. S2CID   16896422.
  26. ↑ M., Clemens, Aaron (2007). "Facing the Klieg Lights: Understanding the "Good Moral Character" Examiniaton for Bar Applicants". Akron Law Review. 40 (2). ISSN   0002-371X.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ↑ K., McChrystal, Michael (1984). "A Structural Analysis of the Good Moral Character Requirement for Bar Admission". Notre Dame Law Review. 60: 67.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ↑ L., Rhode, Deborah (1988). "Moral Character: The Personal and the Political". Loyola University Chicago Law Journal. 20 (1). ISSN   0024-7081.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  29. ↑ "Oklahoma HB1373 2019 Regular Session". LegiScan.
  30. ↑ "Mississippi SB2781 Approved by Governor {2019} Regular Session". LegiScan.
  31. ↑ Camenisch, PF (August 1978). "On the matter of good moral character". The Linacre Quarterly. 45 (3): 273–83. PMID   11661606.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.