Green Cadres

Last updated

Green Cadres
LeadersNo centralised leadership
Dates of operation1914–1919
MotivesDesertion, shortages, addressing real or perceived social injustices
Active regionsVarious parts of Austria-Hungary
OpponentsFlag of Austria-Hungary (1867-1918).svg  Austria-Hungary

The Green Cadres, [lower-alpha 1] or sometimes referred to as; Green Brigades or Green Guards, were originally groups of Austro-Hungarian Army deserters in the First World War. They were later joined by peasants discontented with wartime requisitioning, taxation, and poverty. A substantial number of desertions to the Green Cadres occurred as early as 1914, with their numbers peaking in the summer of 1918. They were present in nearly all areas of Austria-Hungary, but particularly large numbers were found in Croatia-Slavonia, Bosnia, Western Slovakia and Moravia, as well as in Galicia. The Green Cadres had no centralised structure and relied on peasants and banditry for food and shelter. As Austria-Hungary fell apart in October 1918, violent outbreaks associated with the Green Cadres peaked. These occurrences were particularly severe in Croatia-Slavonia, Slovakia and Galicia.

Contents

The Green Cadres were initially portrayed as desirable partners to the national movements working to achieve independence of Slavic peoples from Austria-Hungary. However, when Czechoslovakia and the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs were established, the new authorities found the Green Cadres problematic because of lack of discipline and suspected Bolshevik influence. The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs, faced with large-scale unrest in the countryside had to resort to inviting the Royal Serbian Army to restore order. The move significantly limited options available to the newly declared state, and gave the Kingdom of Serbia considerable advantage during the process of creating Yugoslavia. In Galicia, the short-lived Republic of Tarnobrzeg was established, with the help of the Green Cadres, until intervention by the Polish Army. From October to November 1918, violence was primarily directed against government officials and administration, landowners, and merchants – especially the Jews. The Green Cadres were largely dissolved by 1919.

Background

Austria–Hungary
Austria-Hungary map new.svg
Kingdoms and countries of Austria–Hungary: [1]
Cisleithania (Empire of Austria): 1. Bohemia, 2. Bukovina, 3. Carinthia, 4. Carniola, 5. Dalmatia, 6. Galicia, 7. Küstenland, 8. Lower Austria, 9. Moravia, 10. Salzburg, 11. Silesia, 12. Styria, 13. Tyrol, 14. Upper Austria, 15. Vorarlberg;
Transleithania (Kingdom of Hungary): 16. Hungary proper 17. Croatia-Slavonia; 18. Bosnia and Herzegovina (Austro-Hungarian condominium)

After Austria-Hungary invaded Serbia in 1914, major European powers entered what became the First World War, driven by imperialistic rivalries. Austria-Hungary was allied with Germany—the more powerful partner in the Central Powers. The Central Powers were opposed by the Triple Entente, which consisted of the United Kingdom supported by France and Russia. Germany saw an opportunity to expand its sphere of influence economically and expand into the Middle East, and used Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire as an overland route towards Mesopotamia. Alliance with the Ottomans was also designed to divert Russian resources from Galicia, where Austro-Hungarian forces were battling the Russian Imperial Army. [2]

Austria-Hungary suffered significant economic hardships due to the war. The country had no provisions for a long war and relied on Germany for supplies. Severe fuel shortages and food rationing led to demonstrations and strikes. Demands for political reforms, such as Austro-Slavism or trialism, were refused and replaced with demands for independence of Slavic peoples living in the Habsburg lands. Emperor Charles I proposed federalisation in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent the disintegration of the empire in October 1918. The Hungarian government considered this proposal a repudiation of the Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867 and declared the end of the dual monarchy. The political problems were reflected in the Austro-Hungarian military. The government feared upheaval inspired by the October Revolution and demands to end the war even without victory. [3]

Desertion

Austro-Hungarian prisoners of war returning home from Russia Avstro-ogrski vojaki po vrnitvi iz ruskega ujetnistva.jpg
Austro-Hungarian prisoners of war returning home from Russia

During the war, the Austro-Hungarian Army saw increasing numbers of deserters. Most of them were conscripts from rural areas who escaped from barracks, left hospitals while recovering from wounds or illnesses, or never reported back to their units after leave. Most lived at home and only fled to nearby forests to evade arrest when a patrol approached. They would often be warned of approaching gendarmes by the rural civilian population, which generally supported and fed the deserters. Some of the deserters helped as farmworkers. [4] In the first year of the war, 6,689 were apprehended by the authorities in the Hungarian half of the monarchy, and 26,251 more the following year. In 1916, the number reached 38,866, increasing to 81,605 in 1917. In the first three months of 1918, another 46,611 were arrested. The Austro-Hungarian Army deployed seven infantry divisions to the interior of the country to hunt down deserters, resulting in hundreds of armed clashes. [5]

In 1917, the deserters were first referred to as the Green Cadres by the authorities in Croatia-Slavonia – the crown land where Green Cadres were particularly numerous. In some instances, they were called the Green Brigades or the Green Guards. [6] Western Slovakia and Galicia also saw large numbers. [6] By September 1918, there were about 50,000 Green Cadres among the Croats, Serbs, and Bosniaks, with about 10,000 in Bosnia, and the rest in Croatia-Slavonia. [7] Particular centres of Green Cadres activity were the Petrova Gora hills and the Fruška Gora mountains where 8,000 and 6,000 took refuge respectively. Other major centres were the Zrinska Gora, and Papuk mountains, as well as in Hrvatsko Zagorje near Varaždin, and at the estate of the Metropolitanate of Karlovci near the village of Dalj. [8] There were about 10,000 Green Cadres in Galicia, 4,000 in western Slovakia, and 5,000 in Moravia (around Buchlov). A strong Green Cadres presence was also found in the Hungarian Bakony Mountains, Slovenian Trnovo Forest Plateau, Transylvania, as well as the Wechsel and Semmering Pass regions of Lower Austria. The Green Cadres kept weapons issued to them by the army – including some machine guns, explosives, and artillery. [9]

The Green Cadres had no centralised leadership or formal command structure, although some groups in Croatia-Slavonia had appointed leaders, and enforced rudimentary martial law. By the summer of 1918, their numbers grew as disgruntled peasants joined the ranks. They chose to join the Green Cadres as the armed groups became synonymous with rural rebelliousness. [10]

Banditry

Jovo Stanisavljevic Caruga joined the Green Cadres before gaining notoriety as a highwayman in Croatia-Slavonia. Jovo Stanisavljevic Caruga.jpg
Jovo Stanisavljević Čaruga joined the Green Cadres before gaining notoriety as a highwayman in Croatia-Slavonia.

Banditry was pervasive in the Green Cadres. Many peasants engaged in it as a form of social protest by stealing from the rich to give to the poor – especially in the Carpathian Mountains (in Slovakia and Moravia) and in Croatia-Slavonia. [11] The Green Cadres enjoyed the appeal of romantic liberty in oral folk culture. It associated them with the legend of Slovak highwayman Juraj Jánošík, Slovene Rokovnjači highwaymen who evaded Napoleonic Wars-era conscription in Carinthia, and the Austrian Trenck's Pandurs – a skirmisher unit raised in Slavonia and famous for pillaging in the First and Second Silesian Wars. Several contemporary Green Cadres gained notoriety for their actions – for example Alfonz Šarh  [ sl ] in Slovenia, and Jovo Stanisavljević Čaruga in Croatia-Slavonia. The latter joined forces with Božo Matijević to establish a band of highwaymen. [12] Čaruga gained a popular nickname, the"Slavonian Robin Hood" and was perceived as the sole champion of the common people. Čaruga was captured by authorities in 1923, convicted[ of what? ] and sentenced to death. His execution was witnessed by about 3,000 people. [13]

Austro-Hungarian authorities deemed the Green Cadres a major societal problem. In their view, it was particularly dangerous that the armed groups were significantly influenced by rumours spread by former prisoners of war returning from Russia after the October Revolution and the Brest-Litovsk treaty. [14] By June 1918 half a million of them returned, and another 1.5 million were expected to arrive in short succession. [15]

Peasant revolt

In October and early November 1918, as Austria-Hungary disintegrated, violence involving the Green Cadres worsened – especially in Croatia-Slavonia, western Slovakia, and Galicia. The violence was especially targeted at (former) government officials, socio-economic elites, and Jews. Popular grievances, particularly peasant grievances, were based on ostensible injustices against impoverished peasants. They were aimed at restoring a perceived rightful order disrupted by the war and remedying associated injustices, such as profiteering by merchants and landowners enabled by corrupt officials. As such, the Green Cadres can be compared to earlier peasant revolts. [16]

Croatia-Slavonia and Bosnia

Areas of Green Cadres concentration in Croatia-Slavonia in 1918 (shaded green); locations of peasant (green flags) and soviet republics (red flags) Croatia-Slavonia Green Cadres 1918.png
Areas of Green Cadres concentration in Croatia-Slavonia in 1918 (shaded green); locations of peasant (green flags) and soviet republics (red flags)

On 5–6 October, representatives of Austro-Hungarian Croat, Serb, and Slovene political parties organised the Zagreb-based National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs, tasked with achieving independence from the empire. Within two weeks, the National Council proclaimed the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs encompassing the Slovene Lands, Croatia-Slavonia, Dalmatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. [17] On 26 October, the National Council authorised the Yugoslav Committee, an interest group advocating the unification of Austro-Hungarian South Slavic lands largely corresponding to the newly proclaimed state and Serbia, to speak on behalf of the National Council regarding international relations. [18] At the same time, the National Council president Anton Korošec left Zagreb for talks in Geneva with the Yugoslav Committee, Serbian government, and opposition representatives, to discuss the method of unification with Serbia. [19]

The worst violence in Croatia-Slavonia took place between 24 October and 4 November 1918 – the week before and after declaration of independence of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs. [20] It was precipitated by a mutiny in Požega; the mutineers were joined by the Green Cadres on 24 October. Two days later, soldiers of a Dalmatian and a Czech regiment clashed in nearby Orahovica. [21] Parts of the regiments mutinied and left after ransacking the barracks. [22] Violence spread from Požega westwards to Nova Gradiška and Kutina; and eastwards from Orahovica to Našice to Osijek where elements of the 23rd Regiment and the 28th Regiment of the Royal Croatian Home Guard joined in the looting. The Green Cadres also took part in looting Našice and Osijek, albeit in a secondary role. [21]

Pillaging and looting affected the entire regions of Slavonia and Hrvatsko Zagorje. The main targets were merchants – primarily Jews from Hungary or Austria – whose shops were looted and set on fire. The National Council hesitated to condemn the violence, reinforcing the sense of impunity. [20] The National Council deployed the local National Guards militia to little effect, because the National Guards were largely drawn from the same peasants who were looting. [23] Some gendarmerie barracks were abandoned to looters, while others were captured by the Green Cadres along with local officials as was done in Đakovo and Velika Gorica. [24] In such circumstances, the National Council relied on the conscription of Serbian prisoners of war (captured by the Austro-Hungarian Army during the war) to combat looting, and sent a delegation to the Royal Serbian Army command on 5 November to send troops to Croatia-Slavonia to help suppress the unrest. [25] The property of the nobility and other major landowners suffered heavy damage, and virtually all large estates (including those owned by the Roman Catholic and Serbian Orthodox Church) were plundered. [26] While looting in Petrovaradin, Pakrac, Daruvar, and Županja was led by rebelling army units, and even though released Russian prisoners of war and prisoners released by mob from Zagreb prisons joined the violence, most of the pillaging and looting was done by peasants, and the (mostly peasant) Green Cadres. [21]

Authorities were quick to assign part of the blame for the unrest on the communists and the Croatian People's Peasant Party (HPSS), and addressed genuine grievances by political repression. In the long run, the association of the HPSS with the popular discontent helped propel the party to become the most successful political party among the Croats in the interwar period. [27] The peasants of Croatia-Slavonia initially understood republicanism simply as negation of the existing order, including the abolition of military conscription and taxes, and the October to November unrest set it as the ultimate political objective for them. Three short-lived peasant republics were established in Slavonia. There were also two quickly defeated republics based on the Soviet model – one in the Central Croatia and one in neighbouring Carniola. [28] The HPSS subsequently adopted republicanism as its ideology. [29]

In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Green Cadres plundered provisioning depots in Varcar Vakuf, Glamoč, Jajce, and Travnik. [30] Inter-ethnic violence flared up in Semberija and Eastern Herzegovina where Bosnian Serbs attacked Bosniak landowners killing them and burning their estates. Bosniak mobs moved from Cazin to neighbouring Banija and Kordun regions to attack Serb villagers. [31] As the result of the violence, the National Council asked the Serbian Second Army commander Field Marshal Stepa Stepanović to maintain order in Bosnia and Herzegovina on 4 November. [32]

Slovakia, Bohemia and Galicia

Tomasz Dabal helped establish the Republic of Tarnobrzeg in Galicia. Dabal NKVD.jpg
Tomasz Dąbal helped establish the Republic of Tarnobrzeg in Galicia.

In Western Slovakia, the Green Cadres looted the area of Trstín in the Trnava Region. Like in Croatia-Slavonia, the violence was primarily aimed against Jews and landowners, as well as officials. According to Jozef Ferančík, a prominent Green Cadres figure in the region, this was divine justice, falsely claiming that neither Jews nor landowners fought in the war, and only the Green Cadres knew how to mete out their punishment. Peasants looted estates and granaries distributing liquor and cereal among themselves. Soldiers rebelled in Trnava and, taking a cue from the Green Cadres, proclaimed freedom before plundering town shops. As in Croatia-Slavonia, in addition to the antisemitic aspect, there was an ethnic element to the violence: the landowners, mostly ethnic Hungarians or Germans, were targeted by Slavic peasants. [33]

The Green Cadres had a substantial presence in Bohemia during the war, but there, they remained relatively peaceful, in the immediate aftermath of the dissolution of Austria-Hungary. Nonetheless, there were instances of individual acts of retribution against (former) officials and other authority figures. [34] In Galicia, the Green Cadres were active in the area ranging from Rzeszów and Przemyśl to the Carpathians. [35] The violence followed the same pattern and included the Lwów pogrom. However, violence against Galician landowners lacked the intra-ethnic aspect, as both the landowners and the peasants tended to be Poles. [36] On 6 November, the Republic of Tarnobrzeg was established in Galicia by socialist activists Tomasz Dąbal and Eugeniusz Okoń with support of the Green Cadres. [37]

National emancipation

Changes of borders after the Treaty of Trianon and Saint Germain
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Border of Austria-Hungary in 1914
Borders in 1914
Borders in 1920
Empire of Austria in 1914
Kingdom of Hungary in 1914
Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1914 Dissolution of Austria-Hungary.png
Changes of borders after the Treaty of Trianon and Saint Germain
  Border of Austria-Hungary in 1914
  Borders in 1914
  Borders in 1920
   Empire of Austria in 1914
   Kingdom of Hungary in 1914

In the final weeks of the war, the national movements and groups supporting independence of various Slavic peoples living in Austria-Hungary, including the Czechoslovak National Council and the Yugoslav Committee, unsuccessfully tried to enlist the Green Cadres in their nation-building projects. The Green Cadres' views often differed from those held by the national elites trying to attract their support. The existence of the Green Cadres and their purported strength was used in wartime airborne leaflet propaganda with the aim of demoralising the Austro-Hungarian troops. [38]

As the new states were established, the Green Cadres became a potential threat. [39] On 18 October, a special court-martial was established in Croatia-Slavonia for the Green Cadres – without much success. [40] On 23 October 1918, days before the establishment of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs, the Green Cadres were cheered on at demonstrations held in Zagreb. Six days later, when the Croatian Sabor declared secession from Austria-Hungary, the delegates drew up a formal policy towards the Green Cadres. The president of the assembly Bogdan Medaković attacked them as thieves, arsonists, killers, and enemies of the people, while the HPSS leader Stjepan Radić unsuccessfully advocated a conciliatory approach, calling on the Green Cadres to join the new national armed forces. In newly established Czechoslovakia, the Green Cadres were called, in a newspaper announcement, to serve the national army by reporting to appropriate headquarters. Such appeals were generally disregarded. [39] The National Council of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs declared a general amnesty for those convicted of treason, crimes against public order, or joining the Green Cadres on 30 October. On 5 November, it introduced martial law to suppress acts of rebellion, murder, arson, and public violence. [41] Efforts were made in the newly formed Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes to address a concern shared by the Green Cadres through a land reform of 1919, [42] but those reforms, and those in Czechoslovakia, were half-hearted, or at least perceived as such. [43] Real or perceived influence of Bolshevism on the Green Cadres was a significant obstacle to greater inclusion of its members in the new national armed forces. [15]

In southeast Moravia, many Green Cadres members joined the Slovak Brigade formed in Hodonín. The regional character of the brigade and its Green Cadres history were frowned upon by the Czechoslovak Army. The brigade lacked discipline and was dissolved in 1919. [44] In Galicia, the Republic of Tarnobrzeg was suppressed by the Polish Army in January 1919. After 1918, the Green Cadres gradually dispersed. [45]

Impact and legacy

Interwar period

Proclamation of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs in front of the Sabor in Zagreb Proglasenje raskida veza s Austro-Ugarskom.jpg
Proclamation of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs in front of the Sabor in Zagreb

The October–November 1918 unrest in Croatia-Slavonia as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina limited the options available to the National Council in Zagreb, and destined the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs to failure. The National Council could not pacify the country on its own and saw the pillaging as likely causing further food shortages. Since local militias nominally under the National Council command could not or would not perform the task, there was no other option available other than to invite the Royal Serbian Army to intervene. This gave Serbia decisive advantage in the process of unification of the South Slavs and establishment of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. [46]

The Green Cadres reappeared in 1919 and 1920 in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and in Czechoslovakia in response to disappointment in reforms introduced by the new countries and to land seizures. There was some Green Cadres activity in parallel to a peasant revolt in Croatia-Slavonia and as a safe harbour for those avoiding conscription. [47]

Second World War

At the time of the Second World War, the Green Cadres were used as the name of a number of resistance groups in homage to the original Green Cadres. In 1938, throughout the Sudeten crisis, there were pro-Nazi Bohemian Germans avoiding draft to the Czechoslovak Army, calling themselves Greed Cadres. [48] In 1942, one of the first groups of partisans in the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, operating in the Hostýn-Vsetín Mountains, adopted the name Green Cadre. Carinthian Slovenes formed a Green Cadres partisan group in the Karawanks range, while Šarh reemerged as a resistance leader of the Yugoslav Partisans. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Green Cadres were established as a paramilitary organisation with changing wartime allegiances; [48] its activities continued until the 1950 Cazin rebellion. [49]

Notes

  1. Croatian: Zeleni kadar, Zeleni kader; Czech: Zelené kádry; German: Grüner Kader

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs</span> 1918 unrecognised pan-Slavic state in Southeast Europe

The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was a political entity that was constituted in October 1918, at the end of World War I, by Slovenes, Croats and Serbs (Prečani) residing in what were the southernmost parts of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Although internationally unrecognised, this was the first incarnation of a Yugoslav state founded on the Pan-Slavic ideology. Thirty-three days after it was proclaimed, the state joined the Kingdom of Serbia and the Kingdom of Montenegro to form the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corfu Declaration</span> 1917 manifesto on unification of South Slavs

The Corfu Declaration was an agreement between the prime minister of Serbia, Nikola Pašić, and the president of the Yugoslav Committee, Ante Trumbić, concluded on the Greek island of Corfu on 20 July 1917. Its purpose was to establish the method of unifying a future common state of the South Slavs living in Serbia, Montenegro and Austria-Hungary after the First World War. Russia's decision to withdraw diplomatic support for Serbia following the February Revolution, as well as the Yugoslav Committee's sidelining by the trialist reform initiatives launched in Austria-Hungary, motivated both sides to attempt to reach an agreement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yugoslav Committee</span> South Slavic unification ad-hoc body

The Yugoslav Committee was a World War I-era unelected, ad-hoc committee largely consisting of émigré Croat, Slovene, and Bosnian Serb politicians and political activists, whose aim was the detachment of Austro-Hungarian lands inhabited by the South Slavs and unification of those lands with the Kingdom of Serbia. The group was formally established in 1915, and it last met in 1919, shortly after the breakup of Austria-Hungary and the establishment of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. The Yugoslav Committee was led by the Croat lawyer Ante Trumbić as the committee president, and Croat politician Frano Supilo as its vice president.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ante Trumbić</span> Croatian politician

Ante Trumbić was a Yugoslav and Croatian lawyer and politician in the early 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen</span> Official name for the Hungarian territories of Austria-Hungary

The Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen, informally Transleithania, were the Hungarian territories of Austria-Hungary, throughout the latter's entire existence, and which disintegrated following its dissolution. The name referenced the historic coronation crown of Hungary, known as the Crown of Saint Stephen of Hungary, which had a symbolic importance to the Kingdom of Hungary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creation of Yugoslavia</span> Overview of the creation of Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia was a state concept among the South Slavic intelligentsia and later popular masses from the 19th to early 20th centuries that culminated in its realization after the 1918 collapse of Austria-Hungary at the end of World War I and the formation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. However, the kingdom was better known colloquially as Yugoslavia ; in 1929 it was formally renamed the "Kingdom of Yugoslavia".

The Croat-Serb Coalition was a major political alliance in Austria-Hungary during early 20th century that governed the Croatian lands, the crownlands of Croatia-Slavonia and Dalmatia. It represented the political idea of a cooperation of Croats and Serbs in Austria-Hungary for mutual benefit. Its main leaders were, at first Frano Supilo and Svetozar Pribićević, then Pribićević alone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yugoslavism</span> South Slavic unification ideology

Yugoslavism, Yugoslavdom, or Yugoslav nationalism is an ideology supporting the notion that the South Slavs, namely the Bosniaks, Croats, Macedonians, Montenegrins, Serbs and Slovenes, but also Bulgarians, belong to a single Yugoslav nation separated by diverging historical circumstances, forms of speech, and religious divides. During the interwar period, Yugoslavism became predominant in, and then the official ideology of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. There were two major forms of Yugoslavism in the period: the regime favoured integral Yugoslavism promoting unitarism, centralisation, and unification of the country's ethnic groups into a single Yugoslav nation, by coercion if necessary. The approach was also applied to languages spoken in the Kingdom. The main alternative was federalist Yugoslavism which advocated the autonomy of the historical lands in the form of a federation and gradual unification without outside pressure. Both agreed on the concept of National Oneness developed as an expression of the strategic alliance of South Slavs in Austria-Hungary in the early 20th century. The concept was meant as a notion that the South Slavs belong to a single "race", were of "one blood", and had shared language. It was considered neutral regarding the choice of centralism or federalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">May Declaration</span> Proposal for administrative reform of Austria-Hungary

The May Declaration was a manifesto of political demands for unification of South Slav-inhabited territories within Austria-Hungary put forward to the Imperial Council in Vienna on 30 May 1917. It was authored by Anton Korošec, the leader of the Slovene People's Party. The document was signed by Korošec and thirty-two other council delegates representing South-Slavic lands within the Cisleithanian part of the dual monarchy – the Slovene Lands, the Dalmatia, Istria, and the Condominium of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The delegates who signed the declaration were known as the Yugoslav Club.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs</span>

The National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was a group of political representatives of South Slavs living in Austria-Hungary and subsequently in the short-lived State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs formed in the wake of dissolution of Austria-Hungary. It was established in Zagreb on 8 October 1918, largely composed of members of various representative bodies operating in Habsburg crown lands inhabited by South Slavs. Founding of the National Council was fulfilment of the Zagreb Resolution on concentration of South Slavic political forces adopted earlier that year on the initiative of the Yugoslav Club. The council elected its central committee and the presidency led by Anton Korošec as the president and by Svetozar Pribičević and Ante Pavelić as vice-presidents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trialism in Austria-Hungary</span> Austria Hungary

In the history of Austria-Hungary, trialism was the political movement that aimed to reorganize the bipartite Empire into a tripartite one, creating a Croatian state equal in status to Austria and Hungary. Franz Ferdinand promoted trialism before his assassination in 1914 to prevent the Empire from being ripped apart by Slavic dissent. The Empire would be restructured three ways instead of two, with the Slavic element given representation at the highest levels equivalent to what Austria and Hungary had at the time. Serbians saw this as a threat to their dream of a new state of Yugoslavia. Hungarian leaders had a predominant voice in imperial circles and strongly rejected Trialism because it would liberate many of their minorities from Hungarian rule they considered oppressive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Croatia during World War I</span>

The Triune Kingdom of Croatia, Slavonia and Dalmatia was part of Austria-Hungary during World War I. Its territory was administratively divided between the Austrian and Hungarian parts of the empire; Međimurje and Baranja were in the Hungarian part (Transleithania), the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia was a separate entity associated with the Hungarian Kingdom, Dalmatia and Istria were in the Austrian part (Cisleithania), while the town of Rijeka had semi-autonomous status.

The armistice of Belgrade was an agreement on the termination of World War I hostilities between the Triple Entente and the Kingdom of Hungary concluded in Belgrade on 13 November 1918. It was largely negotiated by General Louis Franchet d'Espèrey, as the commanding officer of the Allied Army of the Orient, and Hungarian Prime Minister Mihály Károlyi, on 7 November. It was signed by General Paul Prosper Henrys and vojvoda Živojin Mišić, as representatives of the Allies, and by the former Hungarian Minister of War, Béla Linder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lipošćak affair</span> Alleged coup détat conspiracy in the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs in 1918

The Lipošćak affair was an alleged conspiracy led by the former Austro-Hungarian Army General of the Infantry Anton Lipošćak to seize power in the recently proclaimed State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs at the end of the First World War. The majority view of the allegations is that they were fabricated by allies of the Croat-Serb Coalition leader Svetozar Pribičević. Lipošćak was arrested on 22 November 1918 under suspicion of treason. He was accused of plotting to establish councils composed of workers, peasants and soldiers in place of the existing authorities with the aim of reviving the Habsburg monarchy, or working on behalf of foreign powers or the Bolsheviks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geneva Declaration (1918)</span> Abandoned agreement on the creation of Yugoslavia

The Geneva Declaration, Geneva Agreement, or Geneva Pact was a statement of political agreement on the provisional political system in the future union of the South Slavs living in the territories of the former Austro-Hungarian Empire and Kingdom of Serbia. It was agreed by Serbian Prime Minister Nikola Pašić on behalf of Serbia, representatives of Serbian parliamentary opposition, representatives of the National Council of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs which recently seceded from Austria-Hungary, and representatives of the Yugoslav Committee. The talks held in Geneva, Switzerland on 6–9 November 1918 built upon and were intended to supersede the 1917 Corfu Declaration agreed by Pašić and Yugoslav Committee president Ante Trumbić. The basis for the talks was provided by the Greek Prime Minister Eleftherios Venizelos on behalf of the Supreme War Council of the Triple Entente. The talks were necessary in the process of creation of Yugoslavia as a means to demonstrate to the Entente powers that various governments and interests groups could cooperate on the project to establish a viable state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anton Lipošćak</span> Austro-Hungarian World War I General

Anton Lipošćak, was an Austro-Hungarian Army General of the Infantry of Croatian descent who served as the Governor-General of the Military Government of Lublin during the World War I. After the war, Lipošćak returned to Zagreb where the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs declared independence from Austria-Hungary. He was accused of plotting a coup d'état and arrested. Most present-day sources consider the charges false. The charges were dropped and Lipošćak released in two months, in early 1919.

The Zagreb Resolution was a political declaration on the need for political unification of the Croats, the Slovenes and the Serbs living in Austria-Hungary. It was adopted by representatives of opposition political parties in the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia presided by Ante Pavelić in a meeting held in Zagreb on 2–3 March 1918. The declaration relied on the right of self-determination and called for establishment of an independent democratic state respecting rights of individuals and historically established polities joining the political union. It also called for ensuring cultural and religious equality in such a union. The Zagreb Resolution established a preparatory committee tasked with establishment of the National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs intended to implement the resolution. The National Council was established on 5 October in proceedings described by Pavelić as a continuation of the Zagreb conference that March.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1918 protest in Zagreb</span> Event in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes

On 5 December 1918, the National Guards and Sokol volunteers suppressed a protest and engaged in a armed clash against the soldiers of the 25th Regiment of the Royal Croatian Home Guard and the 53rd Regiment of the former Austro-Hungarian Common Army on 5 December 1918, four days after the proclamation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. National Guardsmen stopped the soldiers at the Ban Jelačić Square in Zagreb.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1918 occupation of Međimurje</span> Conflict between the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and Hungary

In the immediate aftermath of World War I, the region of Međimurje was occupied by forces loyal to the National Council of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs, one of the predecessor states to the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, in November and December 1918. Predominantly inhabited by Croats, this territory was a part of the Kingdom of Hungary until it was captured by Yugoslav forces. The region was annexed by Yugoslavia, which was awarded it at the Paris Peace Conference (1919–1920).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion</span> Croatian peasant uprising against branding of draft animals

The 1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion, which is also known as the Križ Republic occurred from 4 to 12 September 1920 in the countryside north-west and west of Zagreb in the recently established Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. The rebellion, which centred around the town of Križ, was the result of predominantly economic grievances and resistance to conscription in Croatia-Slavonia. The immediate cause of the revolt was a campaign by the Royal Yugoslav Army, which was tasked with maintenance of public order in the area after the end of World War I, to register and brand draft animals for military use.

References

  1. Headlam 1911, pp. 4–5.
  2. Glenny 2012, pp. 308–312.
  3. Tucker 1998, pp. 204–205.
  4. Beneš 2017, p. 214.
  5. Beneš 2017, pp. 215–216.
  6. 1 2 Beneš 2017, p. 207.
  7. Beneš 2017, p. 217.
  8. Banac 1992, p. 285.
  9. Beneš 2017, pp. 217–218.
  10. Banac 1992, pp. 285–286.
  11. Beneš 2017, p. 220.
  12. Beneš 2017, pp. 218–220.
  13. Sablić-Tomić 2004, p. 171.
  14. Beneš 2017, pp. 218–219.
  15. 1 2 Beneš 2017, p. 234.
  16. Beneš 2017, pp. 233–234.
  17. Ramet 2006, pp. 42–43.
  18. Matijević 2008, p. 50.
  19. Matijević 2008, pp. 56–59.
  20. 1 2 Banac 1992, pp. 289–290.
  21. 1 2 3 Banac 1992, pp. 296–297.
  22. Štambuk-Škalić & Matijević 2008, p. 108.
  23. Banac 1992, pp. 297–298.
  24. Banac 1992, pp. 291–292.
  25. Banac 1984, p. 131.
  26. Banac 1992, pp. 294–295.
  27. Banac 1992, pp. 303–304.
  28. Banac 1992, p. 300.
  29. Ramet 2006, pp. 49–54.
  30. Banac 1992, p. 301.
  31. Banac 1992, p. 299.
  32. Ramet 2006, p. 43.
  33. Beneš 2017, pp. 225–227.
  34. Beneš 2017, p. 227.
  35. Beneš 2017, p. 236.
  36. Beneš 2017, pp. 233–236.
  37. Beneš 2017, pp. 236–237.
  38. Beneš 2017, pp. 227–229.
  39. 1 2 Beneš 2017, pp. 229–230.
  40. Bogdanović 2013, p. 107.
  41. Štambuk-Škalić & Matijević 2008, p. 416.
  42. Kosi 2020, p. 57.
  43. Beneš 2017, p. 239.
  44. Beneš 2017, pp. 232–233.
  45. Beneš 2017, p. 237.
  46. Beneš 2017, p. 238.
  47. Beneš 2017, pp. 238–239.
  48. 1 2 Beneš 2017, pp. 239–240.
  49. Glenny 2012, p. 548.

Sources

Further reading