Greenpeace v. Eni

Last updated

Greenpeace v. Eni
Emblem of Italy.svg
CourtCivil Court of Rome
Full case nameGreenpeace Italy v. ENI S.p.A., the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti S.p.A.

Greenpeace v. Eni is a 2024 human rights law and tort law suit heard by the Civil Court of Rome, Italy related to efforts by several NGOs to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by multinational corporations. [1] [2] The lawsuit was brought by the Italian branch of Greenpeace, the advocacy group ReCommon, and twelve civil plaintiffs. The suit was filed against energy company Eni and two of its co-owners, the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance and the investment bank Cassa Depositi e Prestiti. [3] [4]

Contents

The case, which is based on the 2021 Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell court case, is the first climate change lawsuit filed against a privately owned company in Italy. [3] [5]

Background and previous cases

In April 2019, Milieudefensie (the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth), Greenpeace, ActionAid and four other NGOs, together with 17,379 Dutch individual claimants, filed Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell , a class-action lawsuit against Shell plc, arguing that the oil corporation should change its business model to reduce their carbon emissions by 45% by 2030, in line with the goals set by Paris Agreement. [6] [7] According to the plaintiffs, by failing to adjust to a more sustainable model, Shell had failed to uphold the unwritten duty of care laid down in Book 6 Section 162 of the Burgerlijk Wetboek (Dutch Civil Code), as well as articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [7] [8] Hearings at the district court of The Hague were held in December 2020; [7] in May 2021, judges ordered Shell to reduce its global emissions by 45% by 2030, compared to 2019 levels, with the reduction targets including emissions both from its operations and products. [9] [10] Although Shell appealed the ruling, the case was considered the first major lawsuit to hold a corporation accountable for insufficient measures taken to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement. [10] [11]

On 5 June 2021, a group of 24 associations and 179 civil plaintiffs (17 of whom were minors), led by non-profit association A Sud (To South in Italian), filed a lawsuit against the Italian government in the Civil Court of Rome, with the main goals of holding national institutions "accountable for the state of danger caused by [their] inertia in tackling the climate change emergency", and securing a ruling that Italy must cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 92% by 2030, as compared to 1990 levels. [12] [13] While the co-plaintiffs included members of the Italian branch of Fridays For Future, [12] as well as meteorologist Luca Mercalli  [ it ], [12] [13] other notable environmentalist organizations, including Legambiente and the Italian branch of Greenpeace, opted not to support the lawsuit. The president of Greenpeace Italy, Giuseppe Onufrio, justified the decision by stating that court cases should focus on influential companies, rather than institutions, to be more effective. [12] [13]

On 9 May 2023, the Italian branch of Greenpeace, the advocacy group ReCommon, and twelve Italian civil plaintiffs announced that they would file a lawsuit against energy company Eni, as well as the Ministry of Economy and Finance and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti (both involved as co-owners), in the Civil Court of Rome, [3] [4] requesting that hearings begin in November of the same year. [4] [14] Having been modeled around the Milieudefensie et al v Royal Dutch Shell court case, [14] [15] the lawsuit became the first climate litigation against a privately owned company in Italy. [3] [4] [16] Greenpeace and ReCommon also launched a campaign in support of their lawsuit, named La Giusta Causa (The Right Cause in Italian). [15] [17]

The allegations against Eni focused on the company's central role in increasing fossil fuel usage during the latest decades, despite being aware of the risks related to carbon emissions. [3] [14] A DeSmog inquiry shared some of the documents used by the plaintiffs as evidence supporting their lawsuit: [18] firstly, a study commissioned by Eni itself to an affiliate research centre between 1969 and 1970, which had underlined the risk of a "catastrophic" climate crisis by 2000, posed by an unchecked rise in fossil fuel usage; [14] [18] secondly, a 1978 report produced by Tecneco, another sub-division of Eni, which had accurately estimated that the CO2 concentration would have reached 375-400 ppm by 2000, [5] [14] while noting that such changes to the thermal balance of the atmosphere of Earth could have had "serious consequences for the biosphere." [3] [14] DeSmog's investigation also found that Eni's magazine, Ecos  [ it ], had repeatedly included references to climate change in articles written throughout the late 1980s and 1990s, while hosting advertising campaigns wrongly claiming that natural gas was a "clean fuel". [5] [14] [18]

The twelve citizens who joint-filed the lawsuit lived in several different Italian areas that had been affected directly by the consequences of climate change: [3] [4] [17] for instance, four of them were from Polesine, [17] an area within the Veneto region at high risk of hydrogeological damage due to sea level rise and consequent saltwater intrusion within the delta of the Po River, [3] [4] whereas two other plaintiffs lived in heavily-polluted areas of Piedmont, a region hit by persistent droughts in previous years; [17] finally, two citizens hailed from areas that suffered the worst outcomes of the 2018 Vaia Storm. [17]

As a result of these allegations, the plaintiffs asked the court to "acknowledge the damage and the violation of [their] human rights to life, health and an undisturbed personal life" and rule that Eni must cut their emissions from 2020 levels by 45% by 2030, in order to reach the goals set by the Paris Agreement. [4] [16] In an official response, Eni's board said they would prove the lawsuit was "groundless", claiming that their decarbonisation plans satisfied "the essential objectives of sustainability, energy security and competitiveness of Italy", while labeling ReCommon's accusations as "repeated defamatory actions". [4] [14]

Protests at Eni's headquarters

In the night between 4 and 5 December 2023, a group of Greenpeace activists gathered in front of Eni's headquarters in the EUR district in Rome; [19] some of them scaled the building from both sides, before unfurling two banners with the phrase, "Today's emissions = tomorrow's deaths", while others projected anti-fossil fuel and pro-climate justice slogans onto the building. [20] [21] The activists also installed an eight-metre block with the phrase, "Eni's legacy = climate deaths" in proximity of the company's headquarters. [20] [21] The same day as the demonstration, at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Dubai, the Dutch branch of Greenpeace presented two reports on the estimated impact of carbon emissions from nine major European energy companies, including Eni itself, on premature deaths across the continent by 2100. [19] [20]

Court hearings

The first hearing of the court case took place on 16 February 2024. [1] [2] [17] Eni appointed liberist economist and Bruno Leoni Institute co-founder Carlo Stagnaro, as well as Polytechnic University of Milan professor Stefano Consonni, [1] [2] as their consultants. [1] [2] The decision received some criticism for the perceived lack of independence and competence of both consultants: [1] [2] Stagnaro and the IBL had openly supported climate change denial theories and groups throughout the 2000s and the 2010s, while the academic résumé of Consonni stated that, since 1993, he had been directly involved in research financed by multiple oil and gas companies, including Eni itself, ExxonMobil and BP Alternative Energy, as well as the U.S. Department of Energy. [2]

On the other hand, Greenpeace, ReCommon and the civil plaintiffs received consulting, among others, from CNR research director Nicola Armaroli, psychotherapist and eco-anxiety expert Rita Fioravanzo, and climate change experts Richard Heede and Marco Grasso. [1] Armaroli was already known for being an advocate for sustainable energy transition, [22] while Heede and Grasso had estimated in a 2023 joint-study, published in One Earth , [23] [24] that the 21 "major" fossil fuel companies in the world would owe $209 billion every year, from 2025 to 2050, [23] in compensation for their contributions to climate change. [1] [23] Moreover, Grasso had notably resigned from his post as director of an energy transition-related research unit at the University of Milano-Bicocca in October 2022, over the academic institution's failure to provide clarification regarding funding and management of a five-year joint research agreement with Eni. [25] [26]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Friends of the Earth</span> International network of environmental organizations

Friends of the Earth International (FoEI) is an international network of grassroots environmental organizations in 73 countries. About half of the member groups call themselves "Friends of the Earth" in their own languages; the others use other names. The organization was founded in 1969 in San Francisco by David Brower, Donald Aitken and Gary Soucie after Brower's split with the Sierra Club because of the latter's positive approach to nuclear energy. The founding donation of $500,000 was provided by Robert Orville Anderson, the owner of Atlantic Richfield oil company. It became an international network of organizations in 1971 with a meeting of representatives from four countries: U.S., Sweden, the UK and France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fossil fuel</span> Fuel formed over millions of years from dead plants and animals

A fossil fuel is a hydrocarbon-containing material such as coal, oil, and natural gas, formed naturally in the Earth's crust from the remains of dead plants and animals that is extracted and burned as a fuel. Fossil fuels may be burned to provide heat for use directly, to power engines, or to generate electricity. Some fossil fuels are refined into derivatives such as kerosene, gasoline and propane before burning. The origin of fossil fuels is the anaerobic decomposition of buried dead organisms, containing organic molecules created by photosynthesis. The conversion from these materials to high-carbon fossil fuels typically require a geological process of millions of years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Business action on climate change</span> Range of activities by businesses relating to climate change

Business action on climate change includes a range of activities relating to climate change, and to influencing political decisions on climate change-related regulation, such as the Kyoto Protocol. Major multinationals have played and to some extent continue to play a significant role in the politics of climate change, especially in the United States, through lobbying of government and funding of climate change deniers. Business also plays a key role in the mitigation of climate change, through decisions to invest in researching and implementing new energy technologies and energy efficiency measures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shell Nigeria</span> Nigerian regional subsidiary of Shell plc

Shell Nigeria is the common name for Shell plc's Nigerian operations carried out through four subsidiaries—primarily Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC). Royal Dutch Shell's joint ventures account for more than 21% of Nigeria's total petroleum production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fossil fuel phase-out</span> Gradual reduction of the use and production of fossil fuels

Fossil fuel phase-out is the gradual reduction of the use and production of fossil fuels to zero, to reduce deaths and illness from air pollution, limit climate change, and strengthen energy independence. It is part of the ongoing renewable energy transition, but is being hindered by fossil fuel subsidies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shell plc</span> British multinational oil and gas company

Shell plc is a British multinational oil and gas company headquartered in London. Shell is a public limited company with a primary listing on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and secondary listings on Euronext Amsterdam and the New York Stock Exchange. A core component of Big Oil, Shell is the second largest investor-owned oil and gas company in the world by revenue, and among the world's largest companies out of any industry. Measured by both its own emissions, and the emissions of all the fossil fuels it sells, Shell was the ninth-largest corporate producer of greenhouse gas emissions in the period 1988–2015.

Greenpeace USA is the United States affiliate of Greenpeace International, an environmental nonprofit organization that spawned a social movement inspired by direct actions on the high seas to stop whaling and nuclear testing. Headquartered in Washington D.C., Greenpeace U.S.A. operates with an annual budget of approximately $40 million, employing over 500 people in 2020. The organization relies on donations from members, refuses corporate contributions and refrains from endorsing political candidates, though in 2020 Greenpeace USA issued climate scorecards for presidential candidates and ranked them from best to worst on climate

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in the United Kingdom</span> Emissions, impacts and responses of the United Kingdom related to climate change

Climate change is impacting the environment and human population of the United Kingdom (UK). The country's climate is becoming warmer, with drier summers and wetter winters. The frequency and intensity of storms, floods, droughts and heatwaves is increasing, and sea level rise is impacting coastal areas. The UK is also a contributor to climate change, having emitted more greenhouse gas per person than the world average. Climate change is having economic impacts on the UK and presents risks to human health and ecosystems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coal phase-out</span> Environmental policy intended to stop using coal

Coal phase-out is an environmental policy intended to stop burning coal in coal-fired power plants and elsewhere, and is part of fossil fuel phase-out. Coal is the most carbon-intensive fossil fuel, therefore phasing it out is critical to limiting climate change as laid out in the Paris Climate Agreement. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that coal is responsible for over 30% of the global average temperature increase above pre-industrial levels. Some countries in the Powering Past Coal Alliance have already stopped.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate movement</span> Nongovernmental organizations engaged in climate activism

The climate movement is a global social movement focused on pressuring governments and industry to take action addressing the causes and impacts of climate change. Environmental non-profit organizations have engaged in significant climate activism since the late 1980s and early 1990s, as they sought to influence the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Climate activism has become increasingly prominent over time, gaining significant momentum during the 2009 Copenhagen Summit and particularly following the signing of the Paris Agreement in 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in Turkey</span> Impact of global warming on Turkey and adaptation to it

Droughts and heatwaves are the main hazards due to the climate of Turkey getting hotter. The temperature has risen by more than 1.5 °C (2.7 °F), and there is more extreme weather.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles</span>

Vehicles that are powered by fossil fuels, such as gasoline (petrol), diesel, kerosene, and fuel oil are set to be phased out by a number of countries. It is one of the three most important parts of the general fossil fuel phase-out process, the others being the phase-out of fossil fuel power plants for electricity generation and decarbonisation of industry.

<i>Juliana v. United States</i> 2015 lawsuit

Juliana, et al. v. United States of America, et al. is a climate-related lawsuit filed in 2015 by 21 youth plaintiffs against the United States and several executive branch officials. Filing their case in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, the plaintiffs, represented by the non-profit organization Our Children's Trust, include Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, the members of Martinez's organization Earth Guardians, and climatologist James Hansen as a "guardian for future generations". Some fossil fuel and industry groups initially intervened as defendants but later requested to be dropped following the 2016 presidential election, stating that the case would be well defended under the new administration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change litigation</span> Use of legal practice to further climate change mitigation

Climate change litigation, also known as climate litigation, is an emerging body of environmental law using legal practice to set case law precedent to further climate change mitigation efforts from public institutions, such as governments and companies. In the face of slow climate change politics delaying climate change mitigation, activists and lawyers have increased efforts to use national and international judiciary systems to advance the effort. Climate litigation typically engages in one of five types of legal claims: Constitutional law, administrative law, private law (challenging corporations or other organizations for negligence, nuisance, etc., fraud or consumer protection, or human rights.

Our Children's Trust is an American nonprofit public interest law firm based in Oregon that has filed several lawsuits on behalf of youth plaintiffs against state and federal governments, arguing that they are infringing on the youths' rights to a safe climate system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in Italy</span> Impact of climate change in Italy

In Italy, widespread impacts of climate change are currently being felt. With an increase in extreme events such as heatwaves, droughts and more frequent flooding, Italy faces many challenges adapting to climate change.

<i>State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation</i> Dutch court case about carbon dioxide emissions

State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation was a court case heard by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands in 2019 related to government efforts to curtail carbon dioxide emissions. The case was brought against the Dutch government in 2013, arguing the government, by not meeting a minimum carbon dioxide emission-reduction goal established by scientists to avert harmful climate change, was endangering the human rights of Dutch citizens as set by national and European Union laws.

This is an environmental history of the 2020s. Environmental history refers to events and trends related to the natural environment and human interactions with it. Examples of human-induced events include biodiversity loss, climate change and holocene extinction.

BP P.L.C. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a case in the United States Supreme Court dealing with matters of jurisdiction of various climate change lawsuits in the United States judicial system.

<i>Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell</i> Dutch legal case (2021)

Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell (2021) is a human rights law and tort law case heard by the district court of The Hague in the Netherlands in 2021 related to efforts by several NGO's to curtail carbon dioxide emissions by multinational corporations. It was brought by the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth and a group of other NGO's against the oil corporation, Shell plc. In May 2021, the court ordered Shell to reduce its global carbon emissions from its 2019 levels by 45% by 2030, relating not only to the emissions from its operations, but also those from the products it sells. It is considered to be the first major climate change litigation ruling against a corporation.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cotugno, Ferdinando (15 February 2024). "Eni alla sbarra. Al via in Italia il primo processo climatico contro l'azienda". Domani (in Italian). Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Levantesi, Stella (19 February 2024). "Climate Trial Against Oil Giant Eni Opens in Italy". DeSmog . Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Due organizzazioni ambientaliste e 12 persone italiane hanno fatto causa a Eni e al ministero dell'Economia per i danni del cambiamento climatico". Il Post (in Italian). 9 May 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Talignani, Giacomo (9 May 2023). "Greenpeace, ReCommon e 12 cittadini fanno causa ad Eni per le sue emissioni". la Repubblica (in Italian). Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  5. 1 2 3 Romano, Angelo (12 May 2023). "L'ENI citata in giudizio da Greenpeace e ReCommon: "Sapeva delle cause del cambiamento climatico ma ha continuato a bruciare combustibili fossili". La prima causa 'climatica' in Italia". Valigia Blu (in Italian). Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  6. ↑ "Milieudefensie dagvaardt Shell in rechtszaak om uitstoot". NOS Nieuws (in Dutch). 5 April 2019. Archived from the original on 27 May 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
  7. 1 2 3 Boffey, Daniel (30 November 2020). "Shell in court over claims it hampered fossil fuels phase-out". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 17 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  8. ↑ "Climate change actions against corporations: Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell plc". Clifford Chance . 13 January 2021. Archived from the original on 19 January 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
  9. ↑ Brian, Stuart (26 May 2021). "Shell ordered to reduce CO2 emissions in watershed ruling". Deutsche Welle . Archived from the original on 26 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  10. 1 2 Boffey, Daniel (26 May 2021). "Court orders Royal Dutch Shell to cut carbon emissions by 45% by 2030". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 26 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  11. ↑ Zindy, Hanna (26 May 2021). "Court orders Shell to slash CO2 emissions in landmark climate ruling". CNN . Archived from the original on 26 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Cotugno, Ferdinando (6 June 2021). "Una causa ambientale allo stato per costringere la politica ad agire" . Domani (in Italian). Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  13. 1 2 3 "Anche in Italia c'è una causa allo stato per il clima". Il Post (in Italian). 6 June 2021. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Levantesi, Stella (9 May 2023). "Italian oil firm Eni faces lawsuit alleging early knowledge of climate crisis". The Guardian . ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  15. 1 2 "Causa civile contro ENI presentata da Greenpeace Italia, ReCommon e 12 cittadine e cittadini italiani: "L'operato della società peggiora la crisi climatica e viola i diritti umani"". Greenpeace Italia (in Italian). 9 May 2023. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  16. 1 2 Wright, Ruth (11 May 2023). "12 Italian citizens are suing one of the world's biggest oil companies". euronews . Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sclippa, Natalie (16 February 2024). "Processo contro Eni. Greenpeace e Recommon portano in tribunale il colosso energetico". lavialibera (in Italian). Retrieved 22 February 2024.
  18. 1 2 3 Levantesi, Stella (9 May 2023). "Italy's Eni Faces Lawsuit Alleging Early Knowledge Of Climate Change". DeSmog . Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  19. 1 2 "Blitz di Greenpeace a Roma, attivisti scalano palazzo dell'Eni all'Eur e espongono striscione: "Oggi emissioni = domani morte"". la Repubblica (in Italian). 5 December 2023. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  20. 1 2 3 Martellini, Laura (5 December 2023). "Attivisti di Greenpeace in azione al palazzo Eni a Roma: scalano l'edificio all'alba". Corriere della Sera (in Italian). Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  21. 1 2 "VIDEO - Blitz di Greenpeace sotto il quartier generale di Eni a Roma: stop a petrolio e gas". Rai News (in Italian). 5 December 2023. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  22. ↑ Armaroli, Nicola (20 September 2023). "Sappiamo come uscire dalla crisi climatica, dobbiamo solo decidere se farlo". la Repubblica (in Italian). Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  23. 1 2 3 Levantesi, Stella (30 June 2023). "Counting the cost of climate change – and what major emitters should pay for it". Nature Italy . doi:10.1038/d43978-023-00092-x. S2CID   259763334 . Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  24. ↑ Grasso, Marco; Heede, Richard (19 May 2023). "Time to pay the piper: Fossil fuel companies' reparations for climate damages". One Earth . 6 (5): 459–463. Bibcode:2023OEart...6..459G. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.04.012. hdl: 10281/416137 . ISSN   2590-3322 . Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  25. ↑ Levantesi, Stella (28 October 2022). "Professor Resigns from Research Center Over Partnership with Oil and Gas Major Eni". DeSmog . Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  26. ↑ Carrer, Laura (27 January 2023). "Prof si dimette per protesta dopo l'intesa fra Eni e Bicocca" . Domani (in Italian). Retrieved 26 February 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.