Health action process approach

Last updated
Health action process approach Hapa.jpg
Health action process approach

The health action process approach (HAPA) is a psychological theory of health behavior change, developed by Ralf Schwarzer, Professor of Psychology at the Freie University Berlin of Berlin, Germany and SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland, first published in 1992. [1]

Contents

Health behavior change refers to a replacement of health-compromising behaviors (such as sedentary behavior) by health-enhancing behaviors (such as physical exercise). To describe, predict, and explain such processes, theories or models are being developed. Health behavioural change theories are designed to examine a set of psychological constructs that jointly aim at explaining what motivates people to change and how they take preventive action. [2] [3]

HAPA is an open framework of various motivational and volitional constructs that are assumed to explain and predict individual changes in health behaviors such as quitting smoking or drinking, and improving physical activity levels, dental hygiene, seat belt use, breast self-examination, dietary behaviors, [4] and avoiding drunk driving. [5] HAPA suggests that the adoption, initiation, and maintenance of health behaviors should be conceived of as a structured process including a motivation phase and a volition phase. The former describes the intention formation while the latter refers to planning, and action (initiative, maintenance, recovery). The model emphasizes the particular role of perceived self-efficacy at different stages of health behavior change. [6]

Background

Models that describe health behavior change can be distinguished in terms of the assumption whether they are continuum-based or stage-based. [7] A continuum (mediator) model claims that change is a continuous process that leads from lack of motivation via action readiness either to successful change or final disengagement. Research on such mediator models are reflected by path diagrams that include distal and proximal predictors of the target behavior. On the other hand, the stage approach assumes that change is non-linear and consists of several qualitative steps that reflect different mindsets of people. A two-layer framework that can be applied either as a continuum or as a stage model is HAPA. [8] It includes self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and risk perception as distal predictors, intention as a middle-level mediator, and volitional factors (such as action planning) as the most proximal predictors of behavior. (See Self-efficacy .)

Good intentions are more likely to be translated into action when people plan when, where, and how to perform the desired behavior. Intentions foster planning, which in turn facilitates behavior change. Planning was found to mediate the intention-behavior relation. [9] A distinction has been made between action planning and coping planning. Coping planning takes place when people imagine scenarios that hinder them to perform their intended behavior, and they develop one or more plans to cope with such a challenging situation. [10]

HAPA is designed as a sequence of two continuous self-regulatory processes, a goal-setting phase (motivation) and a goal-pursuit phase (volition). The second phase is subdivided into a pre-action phase and an action phase. Thus, one can superimpose these three phases (stages) on the continuum (mediator) model as a second layer, and regard the stages as moderators. This two-layer architecture allows to switch between the continuum model and the stage model, depending on the given research question.

Five principles

HAPA has five major principles that make it distinct from other models. [8]

Principle 1: Motivation and volition. The first principle suggests that one should divide the health behavior change process into two phases. There is a switch of mindsets when people move from deliberation to action. First comes the motivation phase in which people develop their intentions. Afterwards, they enter the volition phase.

Principle 2: Two volitional phases. In the volition phase there are two groups of individuals: those who have not yet translated their intentions into action, and those who have. There are inactive as well as active persons in this phase. In other words, in the volitional phase one finds intenders as well as actors who are characterized by different psychological states. Thus, in addition to health behavior change as a continuous process, one can also create three categories of people with different mindsets depending on their current point of residence within the course of health behavior change: preintenders, intenders, and actors. The assessment of stages is done by behavior-specific stage algorithms. [11]

Principle 3: Postintentional planning. Intenders who are in the volitional preactional stage are motivated to change, but do not act because they might lack the right skills to translate their intention into action. Planning is a key strategy at this point. Planning serves as an operative mediator between intentions and behavior.

Principle 4: Two kinds of mental simulation. Planning can be divided into action planning and coping planning. Action planning pertains to the when, where, and how of intended action. Coping planning includes the anticipation of barriers and the design of alternative actions that help to attain one's goals in spite of the impediments. The separation of the planning construct into two constructs, action planning and coping planning, has been found useful as studies have confirmed the discriminant validity of such a distinction. [12] Action planning seems to be more important for the initiation of health behaviors, whereas coping planning is required for the initiation and maintenance of actions as well. [13]

Principle 5: Phase-specific self-efficacy. Perceived self-efficacy is required throughout the entire process. However, the nature of self-efficacy differs from phase to phase. This difference relates to the fact that there are different challenges as people progress from one phase to the next one. Goal setting, planning, initiation, action, and maintenance pose challenges that are not of the same nature. Therefore, one should distinguish between preactional self-efficacy, coping self-efficacy, and recovery self-efficacy. [14] Sometimes the terms task self-efficacy instead of preaction self-efficacy, and maintenance self-efficacy instead of coping and recovery self-efficacy are preferred.

Psychological interventions

When it comes to the design of interventions, one can consider identifying individuals who reside either at the motivational stage or the volitional stage. [15] Then, each group becomes the target of a specific treatment that is tailored to this group. Moreover, it is theoretically meaningful and has been found useful to subdivide further the volitional group into those who perform and those who only intend to perform. In the postintentional preactional stage, individuals are labeled "intenders", whereas in the actional stage they are labeled "actors". Thus, a suitable subdivision within the health behavior change process yields three groups: nonintenders, intenders, and actors. [16] The term "stage" in this context was chosen to allude to the stage theories, but not in the strict definition that includes irreversibility and invariance. The terms "phase" or "mindset" may be equally suitable for this distinction. The basic idea is that individuals pass through different mindsets on their way to behavior change. Thus, interventions may be most efficient when tailored to these particular mindsets. For example, nonintenders are supposed to benefit from confrontation with outcome expectancies and some level of risk communication. [17] They need to learn that the new behavior (e.g., becoming physically active) has positive outcomes (e.g., well-being, weight loss, fun) as opposed to the negative outcomes that accompany the current (sedentary) behavior (such as developing an illness or being unattractive). In contrast, intenders should not benefit from such a treatment because, after setting a goal, they have already moved beyond this mindset. Rather, they should benefit from planning to translate their intentions into action. [18] Finally, actors do not need any treatment at all unless one wants to improve their relapse prevention skills. Then, they should be prepared for particular high-risk situations in which lapses are imminent. Preparation can be exercised by teaching them to anticipate such situations and by acquiring the necessary levels of perceived recovery self-efficacy. [14] There are quite a few randomized controlled trials that have examined the notion of stage-matched interventions based on HAPA, for example in the context of dietary behaviors, [19] physical activity, [20] and dental hygiene. [21]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attitude (psychology)</span> Concept in psychology and communication studies

An attitude "is a summary evaluation of an object of thought. An attitude object can be anything a person discriminates or holds in mind." Attitudes include beliefs (cognition), emotional responses (affect) and behavioral tendencies. In the classical definition an attitude is persistent, while in more contemporary conceptualizations, attitudes may vary depending upon situations, context, or moods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Locus of control</span> Concept in psychology

Locus of control is the degree to which people believe that they, as opposed to external forces, have control over the outcome of events in their lives. The concept was developed by Julian B. Rotter in 1954, and has since become an aspect of personality psychology. A person's "locus" is conceptualized as internal or external.

Behavior change, in context of public health, refers to efforts put in place to change people's personal habits and attitudes, to prevent disease. Behavior change in public health can take place at several levels and is known as social and behavior change (SBC). More and more, efforts focus on prevention of disease to save healthcare care costs. This is particularly important in low and middle income countries, where supply side health interventions have come under increased scrutiny because of the cost.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theory of planned behavior</span> Theory that links behavior

The theory of planned behavior (TPB) is a psychological theory that links beliefs to behavior. The theory maintains that three core components, namely, attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, together shape an individual's behavioral intentions. In turn, a tenet of TPB is that behavioral intention is the most proximal determinant of human social behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transtheoretical model</span> Integrative theory of therapy

The transtheoretical model of behavior change is an integrative theory of therapy that assesses an individual's readiness to act on a new healthier behavior, and provides strategies, or processes of change to guide the individual. The model is composed of constructs such as: stages of change, processes of change, levels of change, self-efficacy, and decisional balance.

In psychology, self-efficacy is an individual's belief in their capacity to act in the ways necessary to reach specific goals. The concept was originally proposed by the psychologist Albert Bandura.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theory of reasoned action</span> Psychological theory

The theory of reasoned action aims to explain the relationship between attitudes and behaviors within human action. It is mainly used to predict how individuals will behave based on their pre-existing attitudes and behavioral intentions. An individual's decision to engage in a particular behavior is based on the outcomes the individual expects will come as a result of performing the behavior. Developed by Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen in 1967, the theory derived from previous research in social psychology, persuasion models, and attitude theories. Fishbein's theories suggested a relationship between attitude and behaviors. However, critics estimated that attitude theories were not proving to be good indicators of human behavior. The TRA was later revised and expanded by the two theorists in the following decades to overcome any discrepancies in the A–B relationship with the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and reasoned action approach (RAA). The theory is also used in communication discourse as a theory of understanding.

The term eustress means "beneficial stress"—either psychological, physical, or biochemical/radiological (hormesis).

Social cognitive theory (SCT), used in psychology, education, and communication, holds that portions of an individual's knowledge acquisition can be directly related to observing others within the context of social interactions, experiences, and outside media influences. This theory was advanced by Albert Bandura as an extension of his social learning theory. The theory states that when people observe a model performing a behavior and the consequences of that behavior, they remember the sequence of events and use this information to guide subsequent behaviors. Observing a model can also prompt the viewer to engage in behavior they already learned. Depending on whether people are rewarded or punished for their behavior and the outcome of the behavior, the observer may choose to replicate behavior modeled. Media provides models for a vast array of people in many different environmental settings.

Behavioural change theories are attempts to explain why human behaviours change. These theories cite environmental, personal, and behavioural characteristics as the major factors in behavioural determination. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the application of these theories in the areas of health, education, criminology, energy and international development with the hope that understanding behavioural change will improve the services offered in these areas. Some scholars have recently introduced a distinction between models of behavior and theories of change. Whereas models of behavior are more diagnostic and geared towards understanding the psychological factors that explain or predict a specific behavior, theories of change are more process-oriented and generally aimed at changing a given behavior. Thus, from this perspective, understanding and changing behavior are two separate but complementary lines of scientific investigation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health belief model</span> Psychological model

The health belief model (HBM) is a social psychological health behavior change model developed to explain and predict health-related behaviors, particularly in regard to the uptake of health services. The health belief model also refers to an individual’s beliefs about preventing diseases, maintaining health, and striving for well-being. The HBM was developed in the 1950s by social psychologists at the U.S. Public Health Service and remains one of the best known and most widely used theories in health behavior research. The HBM suggests that people's beliefs about health problems, perceived benefits of action and barriers to action, and self-efficacy explain engagement in health-promoting behavior. A stimulus, or cue to action, must also be present in order to trigger the health-promoting behavior.

Fear appeal is a term used in psychology, sociology and marketing. It generally describes a strategy for motivating people to take a particular action, endorse a particular policy, or buy a particular product, by arousing fear. A well-known example in television advertising was a commercial employing the musical jingle: "Never pick up a stranger, pick up Prestone anti-freeze." This was accompanied by images of shadowy strangers (hitchhikers) who would presumably do one harm if picked up. The commercial's main appeal was not to the positive features of Prestone anti-freeze, but to the fear of what a "strange" brand might do.

The extended parallel process model (EPPM) is a fear appeal theory developed by communications scholar Kim Witte that illustrates how individuals react to fear-inducing messages. Witte subsequently published an initial test of the model in Communication Monographs.

In psychology, the I-change model or the integrated model, for explaining motivational and behavioral change, derives from the Attitude – Social Influence – Self-Efficacy Model, integrates ideas of Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior, Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory, Prochaska's Transtheoretical Model, the Health Belief Model, and Goal setting theories. Previous versions of this model have been used to explain a variety of types of health behavior.

Protection motivation theory (PMT) was originally created to help understand individual human responses to fear appeals. Protection motivation theory proposes that people protect themselves based on two factors: threat appraisal and coping appraisal. Threat appraisal assesses the severity of the situation and examines how serious the situation is, while coping appraisal is how one responds to the situation. Threat appraisal consists of the perceived severity of a threatening event and the perceived probability of the occurrence, or vulnerability. Coping appraisal consists of perceived response efficacy, or an individual's expectation that carrying out the recommended action will remove the threat, and perceived self efficacy, or the belief in one's ability to execute the recommended courses of action successfully.

Psychological hardiness, alternatively referred to as personality hardiness or cognitive hardiness in the literature, is a personality style first introduced by Suzanne C. Kobasa in 1979. Kobasa described a pattern of personality characteristics that distinguished managers and executives who remained healthy under life stress, as compared to those who developed health problems. In the following years, the concept of hardiness was further elaborated in a book and a series of research reports by Salvatore Maddi, Kobasa and their graduate students at the University of Chicago.

Help-seeking theory postulates that people follow a series of predictable steps to seek help for their inadequacies, it is a series of well-ordered and purposeful cognitive and behavioral steps, each leading to specific types of solutions.

The reasoned action approach (RAA) is an integrative framework for the prediction of human social behavior. The reasoned action approach states that attitudes towards the behavior, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control determine people's intentions, while people's intentions predict their behaviors.

Relapse prevention (RP) is a cognitive-behavioral approach to relapse with the goal of identifying and preventing high-risk situations such as unhealthy substance use, obsessive-compulsive behavior, sexual offending, obesity, and depression. It is an important component in the treatment process for alcohol use disorder, or alcohol dependence. This model founding is attributed to Terence Gorski's 1986 book Staying Sober.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rubicon model</span>

In psychological theories of motivation, the Rubicon model, more completely the Rubicon model of action phases, makes a distinction between motivational and volitional processes. The Rubicon model "defines clear boundaries between motivational and action phases." The first boundary "separates the motivational process of the predecisional phase from the volitional processes of postdecisional phase." Another boundary is that between initiation and conclusion of an action. A self-regulatory feedback model incorporating these interfaces was proposed later by others, as illustrated in the figure.

References

  1. ↑ Schwarzer, Ralf (2014-06-11). Schwarzer, Ralf (ed.). Self-Efficacy. doi:10.4324/9781315800820. ISBN   9781317763703.
  2. ↑ Conner, M. & Norman, P., eds. (2005). Predicting health behavior: Research and practice with social cognition models (2nd ed.). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  3. ↑ Sniehotta, F. F. (2009). "Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: Plans, planning, and self-regulation". British Journal of Health Psychology. 14 (Pt. 2): 261–273. doi:10.1348/135910708X389042. PMID   19102817.
  4. ↑ Biddle, S. J. H.; Fuchs, R. (2009). "Exercise psychology: A view from Europe". Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 10 (4): 410–419. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.02.011.
  5. ↑ Wilson, Hollie; Sheehan, Mary; Palk, Gavan; Watson, Angela (2016). "Self-efficacy, planning, and drunk driving: Applying the health action process approach". Health Psychology. 35 (7): 695–703. doi:10.1037/hea0000358. PMID   27195901.
  6. ↑ Sutton, S. (2005). "Stage models of health behaviour". In M. Conner; P. Norman (eds.). Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press. pp. 223–275.
  7. ↑ Lippke, S.; Ziegelmann, J. P. (2008). "Theory-based health behavior change: Developing, testing and applying theories for evidence-based interventions". Applied Psychology: International Review. 57 (4): 698–716. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00339.x.
  8. 1 2 Schwarzer, R. (2008). "Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors". Applied Psychology: An International Review. 57 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x. S2CID   36178352.
  9. ↑ Gollwitzer, P. M.; Sheeran, P. (2006). "Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes". Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 38: 69–119. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1. ISBN   978-0-12-015238-4.
  10. ↑ Scholz, U.; Schüz, B.; Ziegelmann, J. P.; Lippke, S.; Schwarzer, R. (2008). "Beyond behavioural intentions: Planning mediates between intentions and physical activity". British Journal of Health Psychology. 13 (3): 479–494. doi:10.1348/135910707X216062. PMID   17553212.
  11. ↑ Lippke, S.; Ziegelmann, J. P.; Schwarzer, R.; Velicer, W. F. (2009). "Validity of stage assessment in the adoption and maintenance of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption". Health Psychology. 28 (2): 183–193. doi:10.1037/a0012983. PMC   2939463 . PMID   19290710.
  12. ↑ Sniehotta, F. F.; Schwarzer, R.; Scholz, U.; Schüz, B. (2005). "Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment". European Journal of Social Psychology. 35 (4): 565–576. doi:10.1002/ejsp.258.
  13. ↑ Sniehotta, F. F.; Scholz, U.; Schwarzer, R. (2006). "Action plans and coping plans for physical exercise: A longitudinal intervention study in cardiac rehabilitation". British Journal of Health Psychology. 11 (Pt 1): 23–37. doi:10.1348/135910705X43804. PMID   16480553.
  14. 1 2 Luszczynska, A.; Mazurkiewicz, M.; Ziegelmann J. P.; Schwarzer, R. (2007). "Recovery self-efficacy and intention as predictors of running or jogging behavior: A cross-lagged panel analysis over a two-year period". Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 8 (2): 247–260. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.010. S2CID   144677181.
  15. ↑ Schüz, B.; Sniehotta, F. F.; Schwarzer, R. (2007). "Stage-specific effects of an action control intervention on dental flossing". Health Education Research. 22 (3): 332–341. doi:10.1093/her/cyl084. PMID   16945985.
  16. ↑ Luszczynska, A.; Tryburcy, M.; Schwarzer, R. (2007). "Improving fruit and vegetable consumption: A self-efficacy intervention compared to a combined self-efficacy and planning intervention". Health Education Research. 22 (5): 630–638. doi:10.1093/her/cyl133. PMID   17060349.
  17. ↑ Schwarzer, R.; Cao, D. S.; Lippke, S. (2010). "Stage-matched minimal interventions to enhance physical activity in Chinese adolescents". Journal of Adolescent Health. 47 (6): 533–539. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.03.015. PMID   21094429.
  18. ↑ Wiedemann, A. U.; Schüz, B.; Sniehotta, F.F.; Scholz, U.; Schwarzer, R. (2009). "Disentangling the relation between intentions, planning, and behaviour: A moderated mediation analysis". Psychology & Health. 24 (1): 67–79. doi:10.1080/08870440801958214. PMID   20186640. S2CID   14857685.
  19. ↑ Wiedemann, A. U.; Lippke, S.; Reuter, T.; Schüz, B.; Ziegelmann, J. P.; Schwarzer, R. (2009). "Prediction of stage transitions in fruit and vegetable intake". Health Education Research. 24 (4): 596–607. doi:10.1093/her/cym092. PMID   19043065.
  20. ↑ Lippke, S.; Schwarzer, R.; Ziegelmann, J. P.; Scholz, U.; Schüz, B. (2010). "Testing stage-specific effects of a stage-matched intervention: A randomized controlled trial targeting physical exercise and its predictors". Health Education & Behavior. 37 (4): 533–546. doi:10.1177/1090198109359386. PMID   20547760. S2CID   18933664.
  21. ↑ Schüz, B.; Sniehotta, F. F.; Mallach, N.; Wiedemann, A.; Schwarzer, R. (2009). "Predicting transitions from preintentional, intentional and actional stages of change: Adherence to oral self-care recommendations". Health Education Research. 24 (1): 64–75. doi:10.1093/her/cym092. PMID   18245046.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.