Healthcare in Nicaragua

Last updated
Nicaraguan nurse preparing to administer a Papanicolaou test Nicaraguan nurse preparing to administer a Papanicolaou test.jpg
Nicaraguan nurse preparing to administer a Papanicolaou test

Healthcare in Nicaragua involves the collaboration of private and public institutions. Although Nicaragua's health outcomes have improved over the past few decades with the efficient utilization of resources relative to other Central American nations, it still confronts challenges responding to its population's diverse healthcare needs. [1]

Contents

The Nicaraguan government guarantees universal free health care for its citizens. [2] However, limitations of current delivery models and unequal distribution of resources and medical personnel contribute to the persistent lack of quality care in more remote areas of Nicaragua, especially among rural communities in the Central and Atlantic region. [1] To respond to the dynamic needs of localities, the government has adopted a decentralized model that emphasizes community-based preventative and primary medical care. [3]

Healthcare system

History

Before the 1979 Sandinista Revolution

Before the 1979 Sandinista Revolution, the Nicaraguan health system consisted of four distinct agencies and independent health ministry offices in each province. There was little coordination amongst these institutions, and this system was fraught with provincial differences in salaries, administrative procedures, and more. [4] During this 1970s period, Nicaragua had one of the worst life expectancies at birth and one of the highest levels of infant mortality in the regional area. Both of these measures have improved markedly up to 2016, average life expectancy now reaching 74.5 years. [5] [6]

There also existed an unequal distribution of health resources. Only 25% of the total health budget was controlled by the Ministry of Health, and 90% of the services went to 10% of the population. [7] Even though only a quarter of the population lived in the capital city of Managua, health professionals were disproportionately concentrated there. In 1972, half of all Nicaraguan doctors and more than two-thirds of nurses worked in Managua. [8]

Post-revolution

After the 1979 Revolution, the new government established a new Unified National Health System that instated the Nicaraguan Ministry of Health (MINSA) at the head of health services throughout the nation. This system also integrated the Nicaraguan Social Security Institute (INSS) under MINSA's direction in order to make it financially feasible to provide a single national health service available to all Nicaraguan citizens, regardless of socioeconomic background. [9] With the combination of these institutions, the INSS hospitals and clinics, previously only accessible to insured employees, then opened their doors to the larger population. [4]

In 1984, in order to improve existing institutional infrastructure, 10% of the national budget was allocated to the health sector. From 1979 to 1984, the government also successfully pushed for the construction of 309 new primary healthcare facilities and the training of over 3,000 health professionals. [7] Following the wake of the Revolution, MINSA promoted several prevention-based health efforts, one of the earliest being its Brigadista program. This Brigadista program involved the training of community health advocates, the majority of whom were chosen from the Sandinista Youth Organization, who were selected to be trained and transported to serve in underserved rural regions. [10]

Since the 1990s the Nicaraguan government has been changing towards more market-oriented economic policies that have affected the health sector. This healthcare shift has involved increased private sector activity as well as the decentralization of public services. [3] Access to privately-operated healthcare services in Nicaragua may pose challenges for rural communities, influenced by factors including high costs, chronic under staffing, limited diagnostic and pharmaceutical resources, and the remote locations often requiring extended travel to reach such facilities. [11]

Non-governmental organizations (NGO) have become more active in impoverished communities like Nicaragua. [12] A particularly prevalent example of NGO work is medical volunteerism which encompasses free healthcare services, typically provided by international groups. NGO involvement became common around the year 2000, which is the year that the World Health Organization’s Alma Ata Declaration had identified for achieving the goal of health for all. [12] With support from humanitarian agencies and development organizations, NGOs work to meet health care needs that are not met by the country's public health institutions. There is ongoing discussion about the benefits and drawbacks of such medical volunteerism.

Levels

The current Nicaraguan public health system follows a decentralized model. This model consists of three distinct administrative levels, each associated with different health services. Levels include (1) the central level, (2) the SILAIS (Local Systems of Comprehensive Care) level, and (3) the municipal level. The Nicaragua Ministry of Health (MINSA) directs the central level and is committed to ensuring universal access to free health services. [2]

This decentralized model involves annual contracts between MINSA and local hospitals and health centers that are negotiated to set upcoming specific actions, goals, and funding allocation. The contract system is incentive based, and the amount of federal funding decided upon involves the consideration of institutional performance. [13] As part of the public sector, the revenue generated from hospitals, healthcare centers, and SILAIS are consolidated and calculated by the Ministry of Finance before redistribution of certain percentages to the original institutions. [14]

Pacayita health post in Catarina, Masaya, Nicaragua The Pacayita Health Post in rural Catarina, Masaya, Nicaragua.jpg
Pacayita health post in Catarina, Masaya, Nicaragua

Model of Family and Community Health (MOSAFC)

With the intention of maintaining decentralization while expanding citizens' access to quality healthcare, the Nicaraguan government implemented a structural framework model entitled the Conceptual Model of Family and Community Health (MOSAFC) in 2007. [15] As determined by Nicaragua's General Law of Health (No. 423) the overall aim of MOSAFC is to establish integrated networks of public and private service providers that work together to harbor the responsibility of addressing the health needs of specific populations. [16] The overarching goals of this framework were to offer more efficient delivery of health services, improve patient satisfaction with services, and advance the financial protection of citizen's health. [17]

Healthcare workers

There is an unequal distribution of healthcare workers throughout Nicaragua's different provinces. Most healthcare workers are located on the Pacific coast region, while there is a huge need for primary health professionals in the cities of Jinotega and Matagalpa, as well as along the Caribbean coast. [2] In the year 2000, while Managua contained 20% of the population, the city continued to harbor around half of the country's entire health care professionals. [18]

This trend can be explained by overall low financial incentives for health care personnel, especially for work in remote areas. The average monthly salary for a general practitioner in Nicaragua under MINSA is US$544 while that of Honduras is US$1,332 and that of Panama is US$1,025. [19] Additionally, although 52% of Nicaraguan doctors are specialized in training, this specialization level fails to meet widespread community needs for primary care. [18] In order to improve the healthcare access of those living in more isolated areas, the public medical schools in Nicaragua require their graduates to perform two years of social service in high-need settings, after which they can opt to work in private institutions. This requirement aligns with MINSA's objective to encourage these graduates to work for the public health sector. [4]

Amongst Nicaraguan doctors, there persists a lack of gender diversity. Nicaraguan women are underrepresented in the field of medicine, and within the healthcare field have an unemployment rate that is 3.5 times higher than that of men. [18]

Women and children's health

Women waiting outside a gynecological exam room in Masaya, Nicaragua Women waiting outside a gynecological exam room in Masaya, Nicaragua.jpg
Women waiting outside a gynecological exam room in Masaya, Nicaragua

Reproductive health

Nicaragua's adolescent fertility rate is one of the highest in Latin America. Around half of women in Nicaragua give birth before the age of 20. Approximately one-quarter of all the births in the country involve adolescent mothers. [20]

Lack of use of contraceptives contributes to this high pregnancy rate. Out of all sexually active female adolescents, only 7% utilize condoms and only 47% use any modern method of contraception. [21] A highly tradition-based culture, a conservative government, and the influence of the Catholic Church have limited contraceptive use. [22] Educational promotion of contraception is generally only conducted by nongovernmental agencies or women's groups, and it is popular belief among many that various forms of contraceptive methods are detrimental to one's health. [23]

Cervical cancer

Nicaragua has one of the highest cervical cancer incidence rates in the world and the second highest morbidity rate in Latin America, second only to Haiti. [24] Although screenings are provided through their national public health system, only 35% of women have had a Papanicolaou (PAP) smear test by the age of 35 years. [25] A study showed that even when screenings services are adequate, patient follow-up and treatment after abnormal results is of poor quality. [26] A low-cost early detection alternative to PAP smears used in Nicaragua involves visual inspection of cancerous cervical lesions with acetic acid. [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

A health system, health care system or healthcare system is an organization of people, institutions, and resources that delivers health care services to meet the health needs of target populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family planning</span> Planning when to have children

Family planning is the consideration of the number of children a person wishes to have, including the choice to have no children, and the age at which they wish to have them. Things that may play a role on family planning decisions include marital situation, career or work considerations, financial situations. If sexually active, family planning may involve the use of contraception and other techniques to control the timing of reproduction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare industry</span> Economic sector focused on health

The healthcare industry is an aggregation and integration of sectors within the economic system that provides goods and services to treat patients with curative, preventive, rehabilitative, and palliative care. It encompasses the creation and commercialization of products and services conducive to the preservation and restoration of well-being. The contemporary healthcare sector comprises three fundamental facets, namely services, products, and finance. It can be further subdivided into numerous sectors and categories and relies on interdisciplinary teams of highly skilled professionals and paraprofessionals to address the healthcare requirements of both individuals and communities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kerala model</span> Developmental model adopted in Kerala

The Kerala model refers to the practices adopted by the Indian state of Kerala to further human development. It is characterised by results showing strong social indicators when compared to the rest of the country such as high literacy and life expectancy rates, highly improved access to healthcare, and low infant mortality and birth rates. Despite having a lower per capita income, the state is sometimes compared to developed countries. These achievements along with the factors responsible for such achievements have been considered characteristic results of the Kerala model. Academic literature discusses the primary factors underlying the success of the Kerala model as its decentralization efforts, the political mobilization of the poor, and the active involvement of civil society organizations in the planning and implementation of development policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Preventive healthcare</span> Prevention of the occurrence of diseases

Preventive healthcare, or prophylaxis, is the application of healthcare measures to prevent diseases. Disease and disability are affected by environmental factors, genetic predisposition, disease agents, and lifestyle choices, and are dynamic processes that begin before individuals realize they are affected. Disease prevention relies on anticipatory actions that can be categorized as primal, primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Community health</span> Field of public health

Community health refers to simple health services that are delivered by laymen outside hospitals and clinics. Community health is also the subset of public health that is taught to and practiced by clinicians as part of their normal duties. Community health volunteers and community health workers work with primary care providers to facilitate entry into, exit from and utilization of the formal health system by community members.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Pakistan</span> Overview of the health care system in Pakistan

The healthcare delivery system of Pakistan is complex because it includes healthcare subsystems by federal governments and provincial governments competing with formal and informal private sector healthcare systems. Healthcare is delivered mainly through vertically managed disease-specific mechanisms. The different institutions that are responsible for this include: provincial and district health departments, parastatal organizations, social security institutions, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and private sector. The country's health sector is also marked by urban-rural disparities in healthcare delivery and an imbalance in the health workforce, with insufficient health managers, nurses, paramedics and skilled birth attendants in the peripheral areas. Pakistan's gross national income per capita in 2021 was $4,990 and the total expenditure on health per capita in 2021 was Rs 657.2 Billion, constituting 1.4% of the country's GDP. The health care delivery system in Pakistan consists of public and private sectors. Under the constitution, health is primarily responsibility of the provincial government, except in the federally administered areas. Health care delivery has traditionally been jointly administered by the federal and provincial governments with districts mainly responsible for implementation. Service delivery is being organized through preventive, promotive, curative and rehabilitative services. The curative and rehabilitative services are being provided mainly at the secondary and tertiary care facilities. Preventive and promotive services, on the other hand, are mainly provided through various national programs; and community health workers’ interfacing with the communities through primary healthcare facilities and outreach activities. The state provides healthcare through a three-tiered healthcare delivery system and a range of public health interventions. Some government/ semi government organizations like the armed forces, Sui Gas, WAPDA, Railways, Fauji Foundation, Employees Social Security Institution and NUST provide health service to their employees and their dependants through their own system, however, these collectively cover about 10% of the population. The private health sector constitutes a diverse group of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, traditional healers, drug vendors, as well as laboratory technicians, shopkeepers and unqualified practitioners.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rural health</span> Interdisciplinary study of health and health care delivery in rural environments

In medicine, rural health or rural medicine is the interdisciplinary study of health and health care delivery in rural environments. The concept of rural health incorporates many fields, including wilderness medicine, geography, midwifery, nursing, sociology, economics, and telehealth or telemedicine.

Drinking water and sanitation in Nicaragua are provided by a national public utility in urban areas and water committees in rural areas. Despite relatively high levels of investment, access to drinking water in urban areas has barely kept up with population growth, access to urban sanitation has actually declined and service quality remains poor. However, a substantial increase in access to water supply and sanitation has been reached in rural areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Mexico</span> Overview of the health care system in Mexico

Healthcare in Mexico is provided by public institutions run by government departments, private hospitals and clinics, and private physicians. It is largely characterized by a special combination of coverage mainly based on the employment status of the people. Every Mexican citizen is guaranteed no cost access to healthcare and medicine according to the Mexican constitution and made a reality with the “Institute of Health for Well-being”, or INSABI.

Uganda's health system is composed of health services delivered to the public sector, by private providers, and by traditional and complementary health practitioners. It also includes community-based health care and health promotion activities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health care in Argentina</span>

Argentina's health care system is composed of a universal health care system and a private system. The government maintains a system of public medical facilities that are universally accessible to everyone in the country, but formal sector workers are also obligated to participate in one of about 300 labor union-run health insurance schemes, which offer differing levels of coverage. Private medical facilities and health insurance also exist in the country. The Ministry of Health (MSAL), oversees all three subsectors of the health care system and is responsible for setting of regulation, evaluation and collecting statistics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Senegal</span> Overview of the health care system in Senegal

Healthcare in Senegal is a center topic of discourse in understanding the well-being and vitality of the Senegalese people. As of 2008, there was a need to improve Senegal's infrastructure to promote a healthy, decent living environment for the Senegalese.

Various topics in medicine relate particularly to the health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex and asexual (LGBTQIA) individuals as well as other sexual and gender minorities. According to the US National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center, these areas include sexual and reproductive health, mental health, substance use disorders, HIV/AIDS, HIV-related cancers, intimate partner violence, issues surrounding marriage and family recognition, breast and cervical cancer, inequities in healthcare and access to care. In medicine, various nomenclature, including variants of the acronym LGBTQIA+, are used as an umbrella term to refer to individuals who are non-heterosexual, non-heteroromantic, or non-cis gendered. Specific groups within this community have their own distinct health concerns, however are often grouped together in research and discussions. This is primarily because these sexual and gender minorities groups share the effects of stigmatization based on their gender identity or expression, and/or sexual orientation or affection orientation. Furthermore, there are subpopulations among LGBTQIA+ groups based on factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and age, all of which can impact healthcare outcomes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health in Ghana</span>

In precolonial Ghana, infectious diseases were the main cause of morbidity and mortality. The modern history of health in Ghana was heavily influenced by international actors such as Christian missionaries, European colonists, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund. In addition, the democratic shift in Ghana spurred healthcare reforms in an attempt to address the presence of infectious and noncommunicable diseases eventually resulting in the formation of the National Health insurance Scheme in place today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health care in Spain</span> Universal health care system

Spain operates a universal health care system. According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, total health spending accounted for 9.4% of GDP in Spain in 2011, slightly above the OECD average of 9.3%. Spain's healthcare system ranks 19th in Europe according to the 2018 Euro health consumer index. As of 2016, Spain is ranked 1st in the world in organ transplants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Ghana</span>

Healthcare in Ghana is mostly provided by the national government, and less than 5% of GDP is spent on healthcare. The healthcare system still has challenges with access, especially in rural areas not near hospitals.

Health in Nicaragua is influenced by several factors including public health policies, the availability of healthcare facilities, environmental influences, individual lifestyle choices, and socioeconomic circumstances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Peru</span>

Peru has a decentralized healthcare system that consists of a combination of governmental and non-governmental coverage. Five sectors administer healthcare in Peru today: the Ministry of Health, EsSalud, and the Armed Forces (FFAA), National Police (PNP), and the private sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Birth control in Africa</span>

Access to safe and adequate sexual and reproductive healthcare constitutes part of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as upheld by the United Nations.

References

  1. 1 2 Angel-Urdinola D., Cortez R., Tanabe K. (2008). Equity, Access to Health Care Services and Expenditures on Health in Nicaragua. Health, Nutrition and Population of the World Bank.
  2. 1 2 3 Sequeira M., Espinoza H., Amador J. J., Domingo G., Quintanilla M., and de los Santos T. (2011). The Nicaraguan Health System. PATH.
  3. 1 2 Birn, A. E.; Zimmerman, S.; Garfield, R. (2000-01-01). "To decentralize or not to decentralize, is that the question? Nicaraguan health policy under structural adjustment in the 1990s". International Journal of Health Services: Planning, Administration, Evaluation. 30 (1): 111–128. doi:10.2190/c6tb-b16y-60hv-m3qw. ISSN   0020-7314. PMID   10707302. S2CID   1189417.
  4. 1 2 3 Garfield, R. M.; Taboada, E. (1984-10-01). "Health services reforms in revolutionary Nicaragua". American Journal of Public Health. 74 (10): 1138–1144. doi:10.2105/AJPH.74.10.1138. ISSN   0090-0036. PMC   1651882 . PMID   6476169.
  5. Golladay, F. (1980). Health sector policy paper. World Bank.
  6. "Nicaragua | Data".
  7. 1 2 Braveman, P. et al. (1985). Primary health care takes root in Nicaragua. World Health Forum. 6, 369–372.
  8. Holland B., Davis J., Syncrisis, G. (1972). The Dynamics of Health, #9: Nicaragua. U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare. DHEW Pub. No. 74-50007.
  9. Donahue, John (2009-02-02). "The Politics of Health Care in Nicaragua before and after the Revolution of 1979". Human Organization. 42 (3): 264–272. doi:10.17730/humo.42.3.x737h47hqw3r2785. PMID   10263281.
  10. Amador, C. (1980). Informe de la Situacion de Salud de Nicaragua. MINSA.
  11. Nouvet, Elysée; Chan, Elizabeth; Schwartz, Lisa J. (2018-04-03). "Looking good but doing harm? Perceptions of short-term medical missions in Nicaragua". Global Public Health. 13 (4): 456–472. doi:10.1080/17441692.2016.1220610. ISSN   1744-1692.
  12. 1 2 McKay, Ramah (2020). "Global health's durable dreams: ethnography, 'community health workers' and health without health infrastructure". Africa. 90 (1): 95–111. doi:10.1017/S0001972019000950. ISSN   0001-9720.
  13. Chalkley, Martin; Malcomson, James (2002-01-01). "Cost sharing in health service provision: an empirical assessment of cost savings". Journal of Public Economics. 84 (2): 219–249. doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00126-8. ISSN   0047-2727.
  14. Jack, W. (2003). "Contracting for health services: an evaluation of recent reforms in Nicaragua". Health Policy and Planning. 18 (2): 195–204. doi:10.1093/heapol/czg024. PMID   12740324.
  15. Muiser, Jorine; Sáenz, María del Rocío; Bermúdez, Juan Luis (2011). "The health system of Nicaragua". Salud Pública de México. 53: 233–242. PMID   21877088.
  16. Drake, J.; et al. (2011). "Stakeholder perceptions of a total market approach to family planning in Nicaragua". Rev Panam Salud Publica. 29 (5): 329–336. PMID   21709937.
  17. MINSA. (2007). Marco Conceptual del Modelo de Salud Familiar y Comunitario (MOSAFC). MINSA.
  18. 1 2 3 Nigenda, G. and Machado, M. (2000). From State to market: the Nicaraguan labour market for health personnel, 15(3): 312–318.
  19. Juan Roque. (2006). "Los salarios en Nicaragua". El Observador económico.
  20. Blandon L., et al. Early childbearing in Nicaragua a continuing challenge, In Brief, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2006, No. 3.
  21. Zelaya, E.; Peña, R.; García, J.; Berglund, S.; Persson, L. A.; Liljestrand, J. (1996-12-01). "Contraceptive patterns among women and men in León, Nicaragua". Contraception. 54 (6): 359–365. doi:10.1016/s0010-7824(96)00203-x. ISSN   0010-7824. PMID   8968664.
  22. The World Bank. Effective family planning programs. Washington D.C.: World Bank, 1993.
  23. Berglund, S.; Liljestrand, J.; Marin, F. M.; Salgado, N.; Zelaya, E. (1997-01-01). "The background of adolescent pregnancies in Nicaragua: a qualitative approach". Social Science and Medicine. 44 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00084-6.
  24. Drain, Paul K.; Holmes, King K.; Hughes, James P.; Koutsky, Laura A. (2002-07-10). "Determinants of cervical cancer rates in developing countries". International Journal of Cancer. 100 (2): 199–205. doi:10.1002/ijc.10453. ISSN   1097-0215. PMID   12115570. S2CID   25852758.
  25. Claeys, P.; Gonzalez, C.; Gonzalez, M.; Page, H.; Bello, R. E.; Temmerman, M. (2002-11-01). "Determinants of cervical cancer screening in a poor area: results of a population-based survey in Rivas, Nicaragua". Tropical Medicine & International Health. 7 (11): 935–941. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00953.x . ISSN   1365-3156. PMID   12390599.
  26. Vastbinder, M.; Castillo, C.; Bekkers, R. (2010). "Barriers to follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women in Leon, Nicaragua". Tropical Doctor. 40 (1): 22–26. doi:10.1258/td.2009.090076. PMID   20008060. S2CID   5078884.
  27. Claeys, P.; De Vuyst, H.; Gonzalez, C.; Garcia, A.; Bello, R. E.; Temmerman, M. (2003-08-01). "Performance of the acetic acid test when used in field conditions as a screening test for cervical cancer". Tropical Medicine & International Health. 8 (8): 704–709. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01082.x . ISSN   1365-3156. PMID   12869091. S2CID   36686753.