Himalayan foreland basin

Last updated

Satellite image of the Himalayas with the Himalayan foreland basin highlighted in purple Himalayan foreland basin.png
Satellite image of the Himalayas with the Himalayan foreland basin highlighted in purple

The Himalayan foreland basin is an active collisional foreland basin system in South Asia. Uplift and loading of the Eurasian Plate on to the Indian Plate resulted in the flexure (bending) of the Indian Plate, and the creation of a depression adjacent to the Himalayan mountain belt. [1] This depression was filled with sediment eroded from the Himalaya, that lithified and produced a sedimentary basin ~3 to >7 km deep. [2] The foreland basin spans approximately 2,000 kilometres (1,200 mi) in length and 450 kilometres (280 mi) in width. [3] From west to east the foreland basin stretches across five countries: Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Bhutan.

Contents

The Himalayan foreland basin has been studied within the Himalaya (where the foreland basin succession has been uplifted and exposed in the Sub-Himalaya and Lesser Himalaya), and in the subsurface (where petroleum exploration wells and seismic data are used). The foreland basin fill traces back to the onset development of the foreland basin which started during the Paleogene period around 45 to 50 Ma. [4] Deposition in the foreland basin appears to be diachronous; a lag in time exists between parts of the basin. The western extreme of the basin started developing during the Paleocene around 57-54 Ma, the central portion began developing <2 Ma later, and the basin gets younger as it progresses towards the east. [5] [6] The stratigraphic succession of the basin is important as it preserves the sedimentary record of India-Eurasia collision.

Geologic setting

During the Late Cretaceous and early Cenozoic, the Indian Plate drifted northward a vast distance resulting in the closure of the Neo-Tethys Ocean. Approximately 40 to 50 million years ago remnants of the ocean vanished as India collided with the Eurasian Plate. As the continental plates are relatively low density they cannot be subducted. This results in the Eurasian Plate being thrusted up leading to the rise of the Tibetan Plateau, bounded to the south by the collisional Himalayan mountain range. The Himalayan foreland basin is adjacent to the Himalayan mountain belt; it laps onto the Indian Craton to the south and is bounded by stacked thrust sheets of the Himalayas to the north. The foreland basin, much like the Himalayan mountain range, spans approximately 2,000 kilometres (1,200 mi) west to east across Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh. The actively subsiding foreland basin lies beneath the Punjab region of Pakistan and the Gangetic plain of India and southernmost Nepal.

Basin subdivisions

The Himalayan foreland basin has been divided on the basis of modern drainage divides, [2] and subsurface topography. [7] [8] Subdivisions based on drainage divides are most commonly used, with the Indus Basin reflecting the drainage area of the Indus River, and the Ganga Basin representing the drainage area of the Ganges River. [2]

The basin overlies a series of Indian Plate depressions and ridges, that have also been used to subdivide the foreland basin. [7] [8] [9] The rock units that make up the Indian Plate vary dramatically along the length of the basin, changing from Proterozoic Mobile Belt rocks, to Archean Craton, and Proterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup sedimentary rocks. [10] These Indian Plate rock units extend under the foreland basin and have been correlated to a series of depressions and ridges underneath the foreland basin. [7] [8] As the Indian Plate has flexed (bent) under the Eurasian Plate, the depressions and ridges have acted as flexible and stiff areas respectively, influencing the thickness of the foreland basin fill. [9]

Stratigraphy

The Himalayan foreland basin has been divided into different rock units in different parts of the basin. The earliest deposits of the foreland basin are marine mudstones, which are unconformably overlain by continental deposits. [11] Neogene and Quaternary continental deposits make up the vast majority of the foreland basin fill. [2] The stratigraphy of the foreland basin is best known from studies of uplifted strata in the Lesser and Sub-Himalaya, supplemented by data from the small amount of wells that test the hydrocarbon potential of the foreland basin drilled in India and Nepal.

Subathu/Bhainskati/Kohat formations—earliest foreland basin fill

The Subathu formation containing predominantly of shales and minor amounts of sand. Field picture taken close to the city of Simia, India. Subathu.jpg
The Subathu formation containing predominantly of shales and minor amounts of sand. Field picture taken close to the city of Simia, India.

The Paleogene Subathu Formation of India (correlative to the Bhainskati Formation of Nepal, [12] and the Kohat Formation of Pakistan [13] ) represents the oldest known foreland basin deposits, and unconformably overlies older strata. The Subathu Formation and equivalents are relatively thin intervals (<150 m) predominantly composed of fossiliferous, organic-rich black shale. [12] These units are interpreted as shallow marine deposits. Marine to shallow marine facies in the form of shales and minor amounts of sand also consists of predominantly green mudstone with minor red facies and were dated back to the upper paleocene to lower mid eocene period based on the existence of Nummulites gathered from biostratigraphical data. petrographic interpretation of the green Subathu Formation were shown to be predominantly sedimentary with minor traces of serpentine schist input. Although the red facies shows a more felsitic and of volcanic origins, it entails that it originates from continental flood basalts of the Indian craton. The Subathu Formation was interpreted to be a preservation of the intense collision between the two plates in the western part of the foreland basin that leads to thrusting. An evidence of a silicified chert breccia strata existing just on top of the rigid precambrian basement was interpreted as a growth fault that developed as a result of compressional tectonics. The thrust slices in the sub-himalayan ranges now preserves some of the Subathu Formation. Although a debate has arise, it is inferred that some locations where the Subathu Formation is exposed are now considered to be the forebulge of the foreland basin as it is overlain by a much younger formation where a time hiatus or an unconformity has occurred. [14] A time hiatus of an approximately 10 MA are inferred based on thermochronology and magnetostratigraphy between the Subathu and the overlying formation, but it is highly controversial.

Dagshai/Dharamsala/Dumre formations - earliest continental deposits

Field photo of the Dagshai formation exposed in the town of Palampur, North India. Palampur Dagshai Fmn2.jpg
Field photo of the Dagshai formation exposed in the town of Palampur, North India.

The Dagshai Formation has been dated back to the Oligocene-Miocene Epoch where it consists of primarily fine grained material of alluvial origins. The Dagshai is distinctive by its red color consisting of mostly red mudstone, siltstone and grey sandstone. It is the oldest continental deposits and overlies the Subathu formation. A debate has arise of whether the Dagshai Formation overlies conformably or unconformably on top of the Subathu formation. recent research by dating detrital micas and fission track dating of detrital zircons shows conclusively that there is an unconformable nature between the Subathu and Dagshai Formation. [15] Magnetostratigraphic data suggests that the Daghsai formation was deposited at approximately 27 Ma with 2 Ma uncertainty. Previously, multiple studies of facies interpretation of the Dagshai formation has been conducted with varying results regarding the past depositional environment; the presence of quartzitic sandstones was thought to be leftovers of an extensive and prolonged weathering in alluvial plains in which time tropical weathering was intensifying. The study by Yani Najman et al. interpreted that the Dagshai is a result of crevasse play and overbank floodplain facies because of an abundance of fine grained material; The general setting of the Dagshai Formation was concluded to be a past alluvial environment.

Siwalik Group - the thickest record of Himalayan detritus

Field photo of the Siwalik sandstone complex taken in the city of Jawalamukhi, Northern India. Siwalik sandstone complex.jpg
Field photo of the Siwalik sandstone complex taken in the city of Jawalamukhi, Northern India.

The Siwalik Group is a coarsening upward siliciclastic succession that makes up the thickest accumulation of detritus derived from the Himalaya in the foreland basin. The deposits are continental, and largely reflect deposition in floodplain, meandering river, and braided river environments. [16] The Siwalik Group has been informally divided into the Upper, Middle, and Lower Siwalik since the early 1900s based on vertebrate fossil markers. [17] Numerous researchers have broken the Siwalik Group into formations at different locations along the Himalaya, but these formations are local-scale, and cannot be correlated regionally. [18] [19] [20] [21] Boundaries of the Siwalik Group are diachronous, [22] as they have been constrained to different times at different locations along the Himalaya. Because these boundaries are diachronous, it would be incorrect to assign a single specific age to the top or bottom of each subdivision.

Lower Siwalik

The Lower Siwalik is the base of the Siwalik Group. Deposition of the Lower Siwalik started in the Middle Miocene. [22] The Lower Siwalik is characterized by alternating facies of sandstone and mudstone, deposited in fluvial and floodplain environments. [23] Paleosol deposits are commonly interlayered with sandstone lenses on the scale of >1 m to 10 m. [23] The Lower Siwalik is conformably overlain by the Middle Siwalik.

Middle Siwalik

The Middle Siwalik was deposited from the upper Miocene to the Pliocene. [22] This unit is dominated by sandstone beds, punctuated by thin mudstone to siltstone horizons. [23] The sediment supply for the Middle Siwalik originated from the main provenance of the rising Himalayas. With vertical facies variation from sandstone-mudstone to sandstone-mudstone-conglomerate with a thickness approximately 1,400 metres (4,600 ft). [24] The unique part of this multistorey sand complex is the fact that it is underlain by a major erosional surface which extends laterally for hundreds of meters. individual stories vary in thickness and are recognized by the presence of intra and extra-formational clasts along the base of each storey. These facies assemblages suggests a deposition by sheet floods in a braided channel environment. The vertical stacking of this multistorey sandstone complex further indicates of a channel bar that migrates with channels existing predominantly as depositional sites. The Middle Siwalik is conformably overlain by the Upper Siwalik.

Upper Siwalik

The Pliocene to Quaternary Upper Siwalik is interpreted as the sedimentary record of the last phase of Himalayan orogeny. [25] The Upper Siwalik predominantly consists of conglomerate facies in its upper layers and alternations of sandstone, mudstone and conglomerate in the lower part with a maximum thickness of 2,300 metres (7,500 ft). The Upper Siwalik is overlain by unlithified Quaternary sediments such as the Neogal conglomerate and red clays. The basal part of the Upper Siwalik shows predominantly of crudely stratified conglomerate, sandstone and massive mudstone which suggests a deposition of high energy conditions; this facies assemblage and characteristics are commonly found in gravel transport fans and suggests a deposition by gravelly braided rivers in medial to distal alluvial fan settings.

Basin evolution

Continental collision process between the drifting Indian Plate and the Eurasian Plate starting at 60 Ma. Original video courtesy of Tanya Atwater and Peter Molnar. More information regarding the video can be found at http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/atwater/ India-Eurasia collision.gif
Continental collision process between the drifting Indian Plate and the Eurasian Plate starting at 60 Ma. Original video courtesy of Tanya Atwater and Peter Molnar. More information regarding the video can be found at http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/atwater/

Initial collision and onset of the foreland basin development

The Paleocene epoch marked the initial time of the India-Eurasia collision. Based on paleomagnetic records, around the time of 55 to 50 Ma the velocity of the Indian Plate decreased rapidly [26] and is followed by a sequence of thrusts and compressional tectonics between the two plates which then triggered the development of the Himalayan Mountain belt. It is believed that the initial collision occurred close to the equator where deposits of bauxite is found within the stratigraphy of the foreland basin overlying a silicified chert breccia strata existing on the pre-existing basement of the basin. The chert breccia strata was interpreted as a growth fault in the fold thrust belt as a result of compressional tectonics. With the collision being an active ongoing process, it progressively generates weight which resulted a downward flexing of the subducting Indian Plate and created an accommodation space to be filled with sediments. The flexural subsidence of the basin is slow as a result of the hard and rigid precambrian basement making a relatively shallow foreland basin.

Active convergence

Topographic load exerted from the developing Himalayan mountain range results in the downward flexing of the Indian Plate. Modified from Egan and Williams, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Keele University Foreland basin development.png
Topographic load exerted from the developing Himalayan mountain range results in the downward flexing of the Indian Plate. Modified from Egan and Williams, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Keele University

During the Eocene epoch the ongoing process of an active convergence between the two plates increased crustal thickening and further increased the load that originated from the Himalayan mountain belt. From Eocene to early Miocene time, thrusts and uplifts are occurring at the Himalayan zone. [27] The initial development of the foreland basin indicated from the oldest marine deposits in the existing stratigraphy shows the basinal subsidence was shallow as a result of the rigid precambrian basement coupled with a slow rate of sedimentation and sediment starvation. The Eocene period also marked the onset of a shift from marine facies deposits on to fluvial deposits stratigraphically. Continued motion of the Indian Plate after the India-Asia collision further led the focus of the deformation of the Indian Plate across 200–300 kilometres (120–190 mi) of the marginal area of the Indian Shield. This type of event has resulted in intracontinental shortening. Major intracontinental shear associated with the Central Crystalline Zone has been also been recognized. [28] [29]

Climate change and erosion

The Oligocene-Miocene boundary has an important effect on the structure of the basin. Carbon Isotope data and Pollen analysis indicates of a climatic change around SE Asia which significantly increases humidity of the region. From this, reconstruction of monsoonal records was established and it is inferred that around 24-20 Ma is the time when the monsoon intensified. [4] The intensification of the monsoon also resulted in intensification of erosion around the Himalayas. This erosion then caused a reduction in mass of the Himalaya which made the foreland basin partly invert, rebound, and essentially uplift. This is supported by the discovery of the older marine deposition of the Subathu formation in parts of the thrust slices in sub-Himalayas, at a high elevation than it would normally be found.

Hydrocarbon potential

Despite the presence of gas seeps along the Himalaya, and over 70 years of hydrocarbon exploration, no commercially viable hydrocarbon fields have produced from the foreland basin succession. [7] [8] [9] Exploration wells have been drilled in the Indian, Pakistani, and Nepalese portions of the basin.

Most of the drilled wells intersecting the Siwalik Group (Upper, Middle, and Lower Siwalik) indicate poor source rock potential. Organically rich Subathu Formation samples in the form of coal show total organic content levels up to 80%, suggesting the Subathu Formation (and correlative units) may have source rock potential. [30] Despite the high TOC levels, the coals exhibit low hydrogen index which indicates the potential to only form gaseous hydrocarbons. Furthermore, it is assumed that the gaseous hydrocarbon potential by them may have been lost by tectonic events that occurred in the basin. This is evident by palynological rock study that further indicates of more than 96% of the samples taken from the Subathu Formation was organically lean. Exploratory wells for hydrocarbon exploration were also drilled in the town Jawalamukhi. Although the discovery of gas seepages around this area was recorded, currently it does not hold any commercial value to be produced.

Active deformation of the foreland basin

Himalayan deformation was previously thought to stop at the foot of the Himalaya, or the northern boundary of the foreland basin (the Main Frontal Thrust). The Himalayan foreland basin was thus thought to be undeformed. Himalayan deformation has been shown to extend into the subsurface of the foreland basin, in the form of blind thrust faults, and strike-slip faults. [31] These faults reach over 37 km south of the Main Frontal Thrust, and are responsible for several modern-day topographic highs. [31] Active deformation of the foreland basin has only been mapped in one area of Nepal, but may be present in other regions. [31]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Los Angeles Basin</span> Sedimentary basin located along the coast of southern California

The Los Angeles Basin is a sedimentary basin located in Southern California, in a region known as the Peninsular Ranges. The basin is also connected to an anomalous group of east-west trending chains of mountains collectively known as the Transverse Ranges. The present basin is a coastal lowland area, whose floor is marked by elongate low ridges and groups of hills that is located on the edge of the Pacific Plate. The Los Angeles Basin, along with the Santa Barbara Channel, the Ventura Basin, the San Fernando Valley, and the San Gabriel Basin, lies within the greater Southern California region. The majority of the jurisdictional land area of the city of Los Angeles physically lies within this basin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flysch</span> Type of sedimentary rock sequence

Flysch is a sequence of sedimentary rock layers that progress from deep-water and turbidity flow deposits to shallow-water shales and sandstones. It is deposited when a deep basin forms rapidly on the continental side of a mountain building episode. Examples are found near the North American Cordillera, the Alps, the Pyrenees and the Carpathians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of the Himalayas</span> Origins and structure of the mountain range

The geology of the Himalayas is a record of the most dramatic and visible creations of the immense mountain range formed by plate tectonic forces and sculpted by weathering and erosion. The Himalayas, which stretch over 2400 km between the Namcha Barwa syntaxis at the eastern end of the mountain range and the Nanga Parbat syntaxis at the western end, are the result of an ongoing orogeny — the collision of the continental crust of two tectonic plates, namely, the Indian Plate thrusting into the Eurasian Plate. The Himalaya-Tibet region supplies fresh water for more than one-fifth of the world population, and accounts for a quarter of the global sedimentary budget. Topographically, the belt has many superlatives: the highest rate of uplift, the highest relief, among the highest erosion rates at 2–12 mm/yr, the source of some of the greatest rivers and the highest concentration of glaciers outside of the polar regions. This last feature earned the Himalaya its name, originating from the Sanskrit for "the abode of the snow".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maracaibo Basin</span> Foreland basin in Venezuela

The Maracaibo Basin, also known as Lake Maracaibo natural region, Lake Maracaibo depression or Lake Maracaibo Lowlands, is a foreland basin and one of the eight natural regions of Venezuela, found in the northwestern corner of Venezuela in South America. Covering over 36,657 square km, it is a hydrocarbon-rich region that has produced over 30 billion bbl of oil with an estimated 44 billion bbl yet to be recovered. The basin is characterized by a large shallow tidal estuary, Lake Maracaibo, located near its center. The Maracaibo basin has a complex tectonic history that dates back to the Jurassic period with multiple evolution stages. Despite its complexity, these major tectonic stages are well preserved within its stratigraphy. This makes The Maracaibo basin one of the most valuable basins for reconstructing South America's early tectonic history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Molasse basin</span> Foreland basin north of the Alps

The Molasse basin is a foreland basin north of the Alps which formed during the Oligocene and Miocene epochs. The basin formed as a result of the flexure of the European plate under the weight of the orogenic wedge of the Alps that was forming to the south.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreland basin</span> Structural basin that develops adjacent and parallel to a mountain belt

A foreland basin is a structural basin that develops adjacent and parallel to a mountain belt. Foreland basins form because the immense mass created by crustal thickening associated with the evolution of a mountain belt causes the lithosphere to bend, by a process known as lithospheric flexure. The width and depth of the foreland basin is determined by the flexural rigidity of the underlying lithosphere, and the characteristics of the mountain belt. The foreland basin receives sediment that is eroded off the adjacent mountain belt, filling with thick sedimentary successions that thin away from the mountain belt. Foreland basins represent an endmember basin type, the other being rift basins. Space for sediments is provided by loading and downflexure to form foreland basins, in contrast to rift basins, where accommodation space is generated by lithospheric extension.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of Nepal</span>

The geology of Nepal is dominated by the Himalaya, the highest, youngest and a very highly active mountain range. Himalaya is a type locality for the study of on-going continent-continent collision tectonics. The Himalayan arc extends about 2,400 km (1,500 mi) from Nanga Parbat by the Indus River in northern Pakistan eastward to Namche Barwa by the gorge of the Tsangpo-Brahmaputra in eastern Tibet. About 800 km (500 mi) of this extent is in Nepal; the remainder includes Bhutan and parts of Pakistan, India, and China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecca Group</span> Second of the main subdivisions of the Karoo Supergroup of geological strata in southern Africa

The Ecca Group is the second of the main subdivisions of the Karoo Supergroup of geological strata in southern Africa. It mainly follows conformably after the Dwyka Group in some sections, but in some localities overlying unconformably over much older basement rocks. It underlies the Beaufort Group in all known outcrops and exposures. Based on stratigraphic position, lithostratigraphic correlation, palynological analyses, and other means of geological dating, the Ecca Group ranges between Early to earliest Middle Permian in age.

Provenance in geology, is the reconstruction of the origin of sediments. The Earth is a dynamic planet, and all rocks are subject to transition between the three main rock types: sedimentary, metamorphic, and igneous rocks. Rocks exposed to the surface are sooner or later broken down into sediments. Sediments are expected to be able to provide evidence of the erosional history of their parent source rocks. The purpose of provenance study is to restore the tectonic, paleo-geographic and paleo-climatic history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Columbus Basin</span>

The Columbus Basin is a foreland basin located off the south eastern coast of Trinidad within the East Venezuela Basin (EVB). Due to the intensive deformation occurring along the Caribbean and South American plates in this region, the basin has a unique structural and stratigraphic relationship. The Columbus Basin has been a prime area for hydrocarbon exploration and production as its structures, sediments and burial history provide ideal conditions for generation and storage of hydrocarbon reserves. The Columbus Basin serves as a depocenter for the Orinoco River delta, where it is infilled with 15 km of fluvio-deltaic sediment. The area has also been extensively deformed by series of north west to southeast normal faults and northeast to southwest trending anticline structures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offshore Indus Basin</span> Basin in offshore Pakistan

The offshore Indus Basin is one of the two basins in offshore Pakistan, the other one being the offshore Makran Basin. The Murray Ridge separates the two basins. The offshore Indus basin is approximately 120 to 140 kilometers wide and has an areal extent of ~20,000 square km.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kutai Basin</span>

The Kutai sedimentary basin extends from the central highlands of Borneo, across the eastern coast of the island and into the Makassar Strait. With an area of 60,000 km2, and depths up to 15 km, the Kutai is the largest and deepest Tertiary age basin in Indonesia. Plate tectonic evolution in the Indonesian region of SE Asia has produced a diverse array of basins in the Cenozoic. The Kutai is an extensional basin in a general foreland setting. Its geologic evolution begins in the mid Eocene and involves phases of extension and rifting, thermal sag, and isostatic subsidence. Rapid, high volume, sedimentation related to uplift and inversion began in the Early Miocene. The different stages of Kutai basin evolution can be roughly correlated to regional and local tectonic events. It is also likely that regional climate, namely the onset of the equatorial ever wet monsoon in early Miocene, has affected the geologic evolution of Borneo and the Kutai basin through the present day. Basin fill is ongoing in the lower Kutai basin, as the modern Mahakam River delta progrades east across the continental shelf of Borneo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pre-collisional Himalaya</span>

Pre-collisional Himalaya is the arrangement of the Himalayan rock units before mountain-building processes resulted in the collision of Asia and India. The collision began in the Cenozoic and it is a type locality of a continental-continental collision. The reconstruction of the initial configuration of the rock units and the relationship between them is highly controversial, and major concerns relate to the arrangements of the different rock units in three dimensions. Several models have been advanced to explain the possible arrangements and petrogenesis of the rock units.

One of the major depositional strata in the Himalaya is the Lesser Himalayan Strata from the Paleozoic to Mesozoic eras. It had a quite different marine succession during the Paleozoic, as most parts of it are sparsely fossiliferous or even devoid of any well-defined fossils. Moreover, it consists of many varied lithofacies, making correlation work more difficult. This article describes the major formations of the Paleozoic – Mesozoic Lesser Himalayan Strata, including the Tal Formation, Gondwana Strata, Singtali Formation and Subathu Formation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Val Verde Basin</span> Foreland basin

The Val Verde Basin is a marginal foreland basin located in West Texas, just southeast of the Midland Basin. The Val Verde is a sub-basin of the larger Permian Basin and is roughly 24–40 km wide by 240 km long. It is an unconventional system and its sediments were deposited during a long period of flooding during the Middle to Late Cretaceous. This flooding event is referred to as the Western Interior Seaway, and many basins in the Western United States can attribute their oil and gas producing basins to carbonate deposition during this time period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bolivar Coastal Fields</span>

The Bolivar Coastal Fields (BCF), also known as the Bolivar Coastal Complex, is located on the eastern margin of Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela. Bolivar Coastal Field is the largest oil field in South America with its 6,000-7,000 wells and forest of related derricks, stretches thirty-five miles along the north-east coast of Lake Maracaibo. They form the largest oil field outside of the Middle East and contain mostly heavy oil with a gravity less than 22 degrees API. Also known as the Eastern Coast Fields, Bolivar Coastal Oil Field consists of Tía Juana, Lagunillas, Bachaquero, Ceuta, Motatán, Barua and Ambrosio. The Bolivar Coast field lies in the Maracaibo dry forests ecoregion, which has been severely damaged by farming and ranching as well as oil exploitation. The oil field still plays an important role in production from the nation with approximately 2.6 million barrels of oil a day. It is important to note that the oil and gas industry refers to the Bolivar Coastal Complex as a single oilfield, in spite of the fact that the oilfield consists of many sub-fields as stated above.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of Somaliland</span>

The geology of Somaliland is very closely related to the geology of Somalia. Somaliland is a de facto independent country within the boundaries that the international community recognizes as Somalia. Because it encompasses the former territory of British Somaliland, the region is historically better researched than former Italian Somaliland. Somaliland is built on more than 700 million year old igneous and metamorphic crystalline basement rock.. These ancient units are covered in thick layers of sedimentary rock formed in the last 200 million years and influenced by the rifting apart of the Somali Plate and the Arabian Plate.

The geology of Venezuela includes ancient Precambrian igneous and metamorphic basement rocks, layered with sedimentary rocks from the Paleozoic and Mesozoic and thick geologically recent Cenozoic sediments with extensive oil and gas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Junggar Basin</span>

The Junggar Basin is one of the largest sedimentary basins in Northwest China. It is located in Xinjiang, and enclosed by the Tarbagatai Mountains of Kazakhstan in the northwest, the Altai Mountains of Mongolia in the northeast, and the Heavenly Mountains in the south. The geology of Junggar Basin mainly consists of sedimentary rocks underlain by igneous and metamorphic basement rocks. The basement of the basin was largely formed during the development of the Pangea supercontinent during complex tectonic events from Precambrian to late Paleozoic time. The basin developed as a series of foreland basins – in other words, basins developing immediately in front of growing mountain ranges – from Permian time to the Quaternary period. The basin's preserved sedimentary records show that the climate during the Mesozoic era was marked by a transition from humid to arid conditions as monsoonal climatic effects waned. The Junggar basin is rich in geological resources due to effects of volcanism and sedimentary deposition. According to Guinness World Records it is a land location remotest from open sea with great-circle distance of 2,648 km from the nearest open sea at 46°16′8″N86°40′2″E.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of Himachal Pradesh</span>

The geology of Himachal Pradesh is dominated by Precambrian rocks that were assembled and deformed during the India-Asia collision and the subsequent Himalayan orogeny. The Northern Indian State Himachal Pradesh is located in the Western Himalaya. It has a rugged terrain, with elevation ranging from 320m to 6975m. Rock materials in the region are largely from the Indian craton, and their ages range from the Paleoproterozoic to the present day. It is generally agreed that the Indian craton collided with Asia 50-60 million years ago (Ma). Rock sequences were thrust and folded immensely during the collision. The area has also been shaped by focused orographic precipitation, glaciation and rapid erosion.

References

  1. Lyon-Caen, Hélène; Molnar, Peter (October 1985). "Gravity anomalies, flexure of the Indian Plate, and the structure, support and evolution of the Himalaya and Ganga Basin". Tectonics. 4 (6): 513–538. Bibcode:1985Tecto...4..513L. doi:10.1029/tc004i006p00513. ISSN   0278-7407.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Burbank, D. W.; Beck, R. A.; Mulder, T. (1996). Yin, A.; Harrison, T. M. (eds.). "The Himalayan foreland basin". The Tectonic Evolution of Asia: 149–188 via Cambridge University Press.
  3. Decelles, Peter (2012). "20. Foreland basin systems revisited: variations in response to tectonic settings" (PDF). Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins: Recent Advances. p. 413. doi:10.1002/9781444347166.ch20. ISBN   9781444347166.
  4. 1 2 Clift, Peter; VanLaningham, Sam (1 October 2010). "A climatic trigger for a major Oligo‐Miocene unconformity in the Himalayan foreland basin". Tectonics. 29 (5): n/a. Bibcode:2010Tecto..29.5014C. doi:10.1029/2010TC002711. S2CID   130624852.
  5. Singh, B.P. (March 2013). "Evolution of the Paleogene succession of the Western Himalayan foreland basin". Geoscience Frontiers. 4 (2): 199–212. Bibcode:2013GeoFr...4..199S. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2012.09.002 .
  6. DeCelles, P.G.; Gehrels, G.E.; Najman, Y.; Martin, A.J.; Carter, A.; Garzanti, E. (November 2004). "Detrital geochronology and geochemistry of Cretaceous–Early Miocene strata of Nepal: implications for timing and diachroneity of initial Himalayan orogenesis". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 227 (3–4): 313–330. Bibcode:2004E&PSL.227..313D. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.08.019. ISSN   0012-821X.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Sastri, V. V.; Bhandari, L. L.; Raju, A. T. R.; Datta, A. K. (1971). "Tectonic framework and subsurface stratigraphy of the Ganga basin". Journal of the Geological Society of India . 12–3: 222–233.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Rao, M. R. (1973). "The subsurface geology of the Indo-Gangetic plains". Journal of the Geological Society of India. 14: 217–242.
  9. 1 2 3 Raiverman, V. (1983). "Basin geometry, Cenozoic sedimentation and hydrocarbon prospects in north western Himalaya and Indo-Gangetic plains". Petroleum Asia Journal. 6: 67–92.
  10. Valdiya, K.S. (June 1976). "Himalayan transverse faults and folds and their parallelism with subsurface structures of North Indian plains". Tectonophysics. 32 (3–4): 353–386. Bibcode:1976Tectp..32..353V. doi:10.1016/0040-1951(76)90069-x. ISSN   0040-1951.
  11. DeCelles, Peter G. (30 January 2012), "Foreland Basin Systems Revisited: Variations in Response to Tectonic Settings", Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 405–426, doi:10.1002/9781444347166.ch20, ISBN   978-1-4443-4716-6
  12. 1 2 Sakai, Harutaka (1983). "Geology of the Tansen Group of the Lesser Himalaya in Nepal". Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology. XXV: 27–74. doi: 10.5109/1546083 .
  13. Pivnik, David A.; Wells, Neil A. (October 1996). "The transition from Tethys to the Himalaya as recorded in northwest Pakistan". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 108 (10): 1295–1313. Bibcode:1996GSAB..108.1295P. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<1295:ttfttt>2.3.co;2. ISSN   0016-7606.
  14. Singh, B.P (August 2003). "Evidence of growth fault and forebulge in the Late Paleocene (~57.9-54.7 Ma), western Himalayan foreland basin, India". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 216 (4): 717–724. Bibcode:2003E&PSL.216..717S. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00540-5.
  15. Najman, Yani; Johnson, Kit; White, Nicola; Oliver, Grahame (2004). "Evolution of the Himalayan foreland basin, NW India". Basin Research. 16 (16): 1–24. Bibcode:2004BasR...16....1N. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2117.2004.00223.x. S2CID   53689362.
  16. Gansser, Augusto (1964). Geology of the Himalayas. London, New York: Interscience Publishers.
  17. Pilgrim, Guy E. (1913). "The correlation of the Siwaliks with mammal horizons of Europe". Records of the Geological Survey of India. 42: 264–326.
  18. Kumar, Rohtash; Tandon, S. K. (1985). "Sedimentology of Plio-Pleistocene Late orogenic deposits associated with intraplate subduction—the Upper Siwalik Subgroup of a part of Panjab Sub-Himalaya, India". Sedimentary Geology. 42-1&2 (1): 105–158. Bibcode:1985SedG...42..105K. doi:10.1016/0037-0738(85)90076-4.
  19. Nakayama, Katsuhiro; Ulak, Prakash D. (1999). "Evolution of fluvial style in the Siwalik Group in the foothills of the Nepal Himalaya". Sedimentary Geology. 125–3 (3): 205–224. Bibcode:1999SedG..125..205N. doi:10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00012-3.
  20. Corvinus, Gudrun; Rimal, Lila Nath (2001). "Biostratigraphy and geology of the Neogene Siwalik Group of the Surai Khola and Rato Khola areas in Nepal". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 165–3 (3–4): 251–279. Bibcode:2001PPP...165..251C. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00163-2.
  21. Dhital, Megh Raj (2015). Geology of the Nepal Himalaya. Cham: Springer.
  22. 1 2 3 Ojha, T. P.; Butler, R. F.; DeCelles, P. G.; Quade, J. (February 2009). "Magnetic polarity stratigraphy of the Neogene foreland basin deposits of Nepal". Basin Research. 21 (1): 61–90. Bibcode:2009BasR...21...61O. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00374.x. ISSN   0950-091X. S2CID   128986815.
  23. 1 2 3 Quade, Jay; Cater, John M.L.; Ojha, Tank P.; Adam, Jon; Mark Harrison, T. (December 1995). <1381:lmecin>2.3.co;2 "Late Miocene environmental change in Nepal and the northern Indian subcontinent: Stable isotopic evidence from paleosols". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 107 (12): 1381–1397. Bibcode:1995GSAB..107.1381Q. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107<1381:lmecin>2.3.co;2. ISSN   0016-7606.
  24. Kumar, R.; Gosh, S.K. (1994). Evolution of the Mio-Pleistocene alluvial fan system in the Siwalik Foreland Basin, Dehra Dun, India. pp. 143–159.
  25. Verma, Narendra k.; Mohan, Chander; Mukherjee, Basudev (13 February 2012). "Thermal Modelling and Hydrocarbon Generation History of the Kangra - Mandi Sub - basin of the Himalayan Foreland Basin , Himachal Pradesh, India" (PDF). Search and Discovery. Retrieved 24 February 2012.
  26. Najman, Yani (4 April 2005). "The detrital record of orogenesis: A review of approaches and techniques used in the Himalayan sedimentary basins". Earth-Science Reviews. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.04.004.
  27. Acharyya, S.K (September 2000). "The Role of India-Asia Collision in the Amalgamation of the Gondwana-Derived Blocks and Deep-seated Magmatism During the Paleogene at the Himalayan Foreland Basin and Around the Gongha Syntaxis in the South China Block". Gondwana Research. 4: 61–74. doi:10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70655-9.
  28. "Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (under Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Govt. of India)". www.dghindia.org. Archived from the original on 22 October 2014. Retrieved 9 August 2016.
  29. Yin, An (February 2006). "Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history, and foreland sedimentation". Earth-Science Reviews. 76 (1–2): 100–131. Bibcode:2006ESRv...76....1Y. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.05.004.
  30. Mittal, A.K; Pandey, H.C; Singh, R.R; Uniyal, A.K (9–11 January 2006). Geochemistry of Gas Seeps from Surface Shows and Wells of the Himalayan Foreland Basin. 6th International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics. Kolkata: Society of Petroleum Geophysicists. pp. 235–241.
  31. 1 2 3 Duvall, Michael; Waldron, John W. F.; Godin, Laurent; Najman, Yani (2020). "Active strike-slip faults and an outer frontal thrust in the Himalayan foreland basin". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (30): 17615–17621. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11717615D. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001979117 . PMC   7395493 . PMID   32661172.