Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23

Last updated

Article 23 is an article of the Hong Kong Basic Law. It states that Hong Kong "shall enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies."

Contents

The first attempt to implement the article was foiled by a massive street protest on 1 July 2003, when a half-million people marched through downtown Hong Kong. The law was pulled from consideration after division in the pro-Beijing camp and lost the majority of support in the legislature. China's National People's Congress imposed a national security law with similar language (though without the treason component) on Hong Kong on 30 June 2020, citing its authority under Article 18 of the Basic Law. A second attempt at implementing the article has undergone the legislative process. The bill was officially passed on 19 March 2024 and came into effect on 23 March 2024.

Content

Article 23 of the Basic Law (BL 23) states:

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organisations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organisations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organisations or bodies. [1]

Background

Article 23 had undergone significant revisions before the promulgation of its current form on 4 April 1990. The 1987 version of Article 23 (Article 22 in 1987) was much shorter and only required that

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall prohibit by law any act that damages the national unity or subverts the Central People's Government. [2]

The 1989 February version of Article 23 only contained the first half of the enacted version, with identical wording with the promulgated version up to the phrase “or theft of state secrets”. The consultative committee noted views that Article 23 might affect the freedom of Hong Kong people. It also noted the view that the provision was against the Sino-British Joint Declaration since “it is generally held that the capitalist system is anti-communist and will undermine national unity and subvert the Central People's Government”. [3]

Similar laws had been in force during the British colonial period, but they had not been strictly enforced since 1945. [4] The Emergency Regulations Ordinance (ERO) from the colonial period remains in force, but in 2019 the Court of First Instance ruled that it was "not compatible with the constitutional order laid down by the Basic Law" due to its unchecked and wide scope. The Court of Appeal later varied this by permitting the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation as reasonable and valid, but stated Emergency Regulations Ordinance regulations were "subject to judicial scrutiny." [5]

Before 1997, the British colonial government introduced the Crimes (Amendment)(No.2) Bill 1996 in an attempt to concretise the concepts of "subversion" and "secession" by confining them to actual violent conduct but of no avail. The bill was voted down in the elected Legislative Council of Hong Kong amid opposition from Beijing and thus left a vacuum in the present legislation. [6]

2003 National Security Bill

Mainland national security laws do not apply in Hong Kong, by virtue of Article 18 of the Basic Law. As a result, there has been steady pressure from CPG on the HKSAR government to meet its obligations under Article 23. Laws for the purposes of this Article were introduced by the Tung administration in late 2002. [3] In February 2003, the HKSAR government proposed the National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill 2003 to the Legislative Council which aimed to amend the Crimes Ordinance, the Official Secrets Ordinance and the Societies Ordinance pursuant to the obligation imposed by Article 23 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and to provide for related, incidental and consequential amendments. [7] The proposed bill caused considerable controversy in Hong Kong and a massive demonstration on 1 July 2003. In the aftermath, Liberal Party chairman James Tien resigned from the Executive Council and the bill was withdrawn after it became clear that it would not get the necessary support from the Legislative Council for it to be passed. The bill was then shelved indefinitely. [4]

After 2003

There were calls for reintroducing the national security bill after the 2003 setbacks from the pro-Beijing camp occasionally. After the Beijing interpretation of the Basic Law in November 2016 over the Legislative Council oath-taking controversy to eject two pro-independence legislators from the legislature on the basis that "[Beijing] will absolutely neither permit anyone advocating secession in Hong Kong nor allow any pro-independence activists to enter a government institution," Chief executive Leung Chun-ying said Hong Kong would enact Article 23 targeting the pro-independence movement in Hong Kong. [8]

The Director of the Hong Kong Liaison Office Wang Zhimin accused pro-independence activists of "engaging in activities that sought to separate the motherland and subvert the national regime" and urged the Hong Kong government to enact national security legislation as he said "Hong Kong is the only place in the world without a national security legislation – it’s a major weakness in the nation’s overall security, and it has a direct impact on residents." Wang said without a national security law, "Hong Kong independence radicals have been challenging national sovereignty and security in recent years". [9]

Xi Jinping's accession to General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, the top position in November 2012, marked a more hardline authoritarian approach, most notably with the construction of Xinjiang internment camps. The spectre that Hong Kong may similarly be brought to heel became an important element in the democratic protests. [10]

Protests in 2019 and imposition of security law in 2020

The 2019–20 Hong Kong protests led to an increasing desire within some pro-Beijing lawmakers [11] [12] for Hong Kong to legislate Article 23 of the Basic Law. [13] On 21 May 2020, the Chinese Government proposed a new law on national security regulations that may be enacted in Hong Kong under the provisions of Annex III of its Basic law. It may set up the legal framework to prevent and punish subversion, terrorism, separatism and foreign interference. [14] [15] The following day, a dozen pan-democrat lawmakers marched to the Chinese Liaison Office to show their disapproval. [16]

On 30 June 2020, the mainland 13th National People's Congress and it's Standing Committee imposed the Hong Kong national security law covering secession and subversion under Article 18 of the Basic Law. [12] [17] The areas of treason, sedition and theft of state secrets are not covered by the new Article 18 law, and remain to be implemented under Article 23 by the Hong Kong SAR. [12] On 12 January 2022, Chief Executive Carrie Lam announced at the first session of the new legislature that new "local legislation" would be created to meet the requirements of Article 23. [18]

Safeguarding National Security Bill

On 12 April 2022, Chief Executive John Lee stated that implementing security legislation under Article 23 of the Basic Law would be a top priority for him. [19] Lee later said in July 2022 that he preferred not to rush the law, which some saw as backtracking on his election pledge. [20] The legislation was put on the back burner and was not scheduled for Legislative Council discussion in 2022. [20]

In January 2023, after meeting with Chinese Communist Party officer Xia Baolong, who asked that the Lee administration revise local legislation to keep it aligned with the national security law, Lee said that he would once again prioritize legislation under Article 23 as soon as possible. [21]

Hong Kong's Security Bureau launched a public consultation on Article 23 legislation on 30 January 2024, which ended on 28 February 2024. [22] A draft of the Safeguarding National Security Bill was introduced to the Legislative Council on 8 March 2024, which includes penalties up to life imprisonment for treason, insurrection and incitement of a member of Chinese armed forces to mutiny. [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong Basic Law</span> Organic law of the Hong Kong SAR

The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China is a national law of China that serves as the organic law for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). Comprising nine chapters, 160 articles and three annexes, the Basic Law was composed to implement Annex I of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Executive of Hong Kong</span> Head of the government of Hong Kong

The chief executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is the representative of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and head of the Government of Hong Kong. The position was created to replace the office of governor of Hong Kong, the representative of the monarch of the United Kingdom during British rule. The office, stipulated by the Hong Kong Basic Law, formally came into being on 1 July 1997 with the handover of Hong Kong from the United Kingdom to the People's Republic of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-Secession Law</span> 2005 Chinese legislation authorizing military force for unification with Taiwan

The Anti-Secession Law is a law of the People's Republic of China, passed by the 3rd Session of the 10th National People's Congress. It was ratified on March 14, 2005, and went into effect immediately. President Hu Jintao promulgated the law with Presidential Decree No. 34. Although the law, at ten articles, is relatively short, Article 8 formalized the long-standing policy of the PRC to use military means against Taiwan independence in the event peaceful means become otherwise impossible. The law does not explicitly equate "China" with the People's Republic of China.

Establishment Day, formally the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Establishment Day, is celebrated annually on 1 July in Hong Kong, China since 1997. The holiday celebrates the transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong from the United Kingdom to the People's Republic of China and the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The similarly-named holiday in Macau occurs on 20 December, the day of its handover from Portugal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macau national security law</span>

The Macau national security law is a law in Macau which prohibits and punishes acts of "treason, secession, and subversion" against the Central government, as well as "preparatory acts" leading to any of the three acts. Taken into effect on 3 March 2009, the purpose of the law is to fulfil Article 23 of the Macau Basic Law, the de facto constitution of the Macau Special Administration Region. Macau National Security Law has been in force for eleven years. Pro-Beijing state-owned Hong Kong Newspaper Wen Wei Po claimed that Macau's National Security Law "has not been used".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong independence</span> Independence movement in East Asia

Hong Kong independence is the notion of Hong Kong as a sovereign state, independent from the People's Republic of China (PRC). Hong Kong is a special administrative region (SAR) of China and is thus granted a high degree of de jure autonomy, as stipulated by Article 2 of the Hong Kong Basic Law ratified under the Sino-British Joint Declaration. Since the transfer of the sovereignty of Hong Kong from the United Kingdom to the PRC in 1997, a growing number of Hongkongers have become concerned about what they see as Beijing's encroachment on the territory's freedoms and the failure of the Hong Kong government to deliver "genuine democracy". Advocating for Hong Kong independence became illegal after the Hong Kong national security law in 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2nd Legislative Council of Hong Kong</span> 2000–2004 Legislative Council of Hong Kong

The Second Legislative Council of Hong Kong was the meeting of the legislative branch of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government. The membership of the LegCo is based on the 2000 election. The term of the session was from 1 October 2000 to 30 September 2004, during the latter half of the first term of the Tung Chee-hwa's administration and the most of the Tung's second term in office. The pro-democratic Democratic Party remained the largest party with 13 seats. Notable newcomers to the Legislative Council included Wong Sing-chi, Michael Mak, Li Fung-ying, Lo Wing-lok, Abraham Shek, Tommy Cheung and Audrey Eu who won the seat vacated by Gary Cheng in the 2000 Hong Kong Island by-election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong National Party</span> Political party in Hong Kong

The Hong Kong National Party was a localist political party from 2016 to 2018 in Hong Kong. It was the first political party in Hong Kong to advocate for Hong Kong independence. The Hong Kong National Party is also the first political party to be outlawed since Hong Kong's 1997 handover to China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill 2003</span>

National Security Bill was a proposed bill which aimed to amend the Crimes Ordinance, the Official Secrets Ordinance and the Societies Ordinance pursuant to the obligation imposed by Article 23 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and to provide for related, incidental and consequential amendments. The proposed bill caused considerable controversy in Hong Kong and a massive demonstration on 1 July 2003. In the aftermath, James Tien resigned from the Executive Council and the bill was withdrawn after it became clear that it would not get the necessary support from the Legislative Council for it to be passed. The bill was then shelved indefinitely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Societies Ordinance</span>

The Societies Ordinance is a piece of primary legislation in Hong Kong. It was enacted in 1911 and has undergone major revisions. The Ordinance regulates incorporated and unincorporated associations of persons and requires registrations. In other words, it prohibits informal or secret societies and poses limits to freedom of association. It also prohibits triad societies and modern successor gangs.

Events in the year 2020 in Hong Kong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National People's Congress decision on Hong Kong national security legislation</span>

The Decision of the National People's Congress on Establishing and Improving the Legal System and Enforcement Mechanisms for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to Safeguard National Security is a congressional resolution passed by the third session of the 13th National People's Congress on 28 May 2020. This resolution authorizes the National People's Congress Standing Committee to promulgate a national security law in Hong Kong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Hong Kong national security law</span> Chinas 2020 national law on national security in Hong Kong

The Hong Kong national security law, officially the Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is a national law of China on Hong Kong national security passed in 2020. It is implemented in Hong Kong in accordance to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 18, which allows for Chinese laws to be valid in Hong Kong if they are included in Annex III. It was formulated under the authorization of the National People's Congress decision on Hong Kong national security legislation. The law was passed on 30 June 2020 by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress as a means of resolving the anti-extradition bill protests instigated by a Hong Kong local bill proposed in 2019 to enable extradition to other territories including the mainland, and came into force the same day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Hong Kong pro-democracy primaries</span>

The 2020 Hong Kong pro-democracy primaries were held on 11 and 12 July 2020 for selecting the numbers of pro-democracy candidates for the subsequently postponed 2020 Legislative Council election to maximise the chance for the pro-democrats to achieve a majority in the 70-seat Legislative Council.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Postponement of the 2020 Hong Kong legislative election</span>

The 2020 Hong Kong Legislative Council election was originally scheduled on 6 September 2020 until it was postponed by the government. On 31 July 2020, Chief Executive Carrie Lam announced that she was invoking the Emergency Regulations Ordinance to postpone the election under the emergency powers granted to her by it, citing the recent resurgence of the COVID-19 cases, adding that the move was supported by Beijing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2021 Hong Kong electoral changes</span> Hong Kong legislation

The 2021 Hong Kong electoral changes were initiated by the National People's Congress (NPC) on 11 March 2021 to "amend electoral rules and improve the electoral system" of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) for its Chief Executive (CE) and the Legislative Council (LegCo), in order to ensure a system in which only "patriots", according to the Chinese definition, govern Hong Kong. The reforms have been widely criticized for their negative impact on the democratic representation in the Hong Kong legislature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Safeguarding National Security Ordinance</span> 2024 Hong Kong law

The Safeguarding National Security Ordinance is a local law of Hong Kong. It was introduced by the Government of Hong Kong on 8 March 2024, passed by the Legislative Council on 19 March 2024, and took effect on 23 March 2024. The ordinance is enacted to implement Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law.

Hong Kong national security law may refer to:

References

  1. "Basic Law - Chapter 2". Hong Kong government. Archived from the original on 29 July 2010. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  2. Bokhary, Kemal; Ramsden, Michael; Hargreaves, Stuart (2015). Hong Kong Basic Law Handbook. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuter. p. 68.
  3. 1 2 Bokhary, Ramsden & Hargreaves 2015, p. 69.
  4. 1 2 C. George Kleeman (2005). "The Proposal to Implement Article 23 of the Basic Law in Hong Kong: A Missed Opportunity for Reconciliation and Reunification Between China and Taiwan". The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law. 23 (3). Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  5. Gupta, Sourabh (17 June 2020). "Hong Kong National Security Law". Institute for China-America Studies. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
  6. Wong, Yiu-chung (2008). One Country, Two Systems in Crisis: Hong Kong's Transformation since the Handover. Lexington Books. pp. 69–70.
  7. "National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill to be introduced into LegCo". Hong Kong government. 24 February 2003. Archived from the original on 20 March 2018. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  8. Cheung, Tony; Lam, Jeffie; Ng, Joyce; Cheung, Gary (7 November 2016). "Hong Kong will move on controversial security law, CY Leung says, as Beijing bars independence activists from Legco". South China Morning Post . Archived from the original on 2 February 2018. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  9. Cheung, Tony (15 April 2018). "Hong Kong is 'only place in the world without national security law', liaison office chief says". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 18 April 2018. Retrieved 17 April 2018.
  10. Branigan, Tania; Kuo, Lily (9 June 2020). "How Hong Kong caught fire: the story of a radical uprising". The Guardian . Retrieved 2 July 2020.
  11. Davidson, Helen (15 April 2020). "China's top official in Hong Kong pushes for national security law". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
  12. 1 2 3 Cross, Grenville (29 May 2020). "If Hong Kong had enacted national security laws on its own, Beijing wouldn't be stepping in". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  13. "Hong Kong 'must not delay national security law'". South China Morning Post. 21 December 2019. Archived from the original on 19 April 2020. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
  14. "China law requires Hong Kong to enact national security rules as soon as possible". Reuters. 22 May 2020. Archived from the original on 24 May 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
  15. "Hong Kong security law: What is it and is it worrying?". BBC News. 29 May 2020. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
  16. Editorial, Reuters. "Hong Kong lawmakers, activists condemn Beijing's national security law legislation | Reuters Video". www.reuters.com. Archived from the original on 24 May 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2020.{{cite web}}: |first= has generic name (help)
  17. Yuan, Dang (8 June 2020). "Hong Kong security law: What does China really intend?". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
  18. "Hong Kong to create more 'national security' crimes, Chief Exec. Carrie Lam says". Hong Kong Free Press . AFP. 12 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
  19. Cheng, Lilian; Lam, Nadia (12 April 2022). "Hong Kong elections: John Lee says Article 23 legislation will be a top priority". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 12 April 2022. Retrieved 12 April 2022.
  20. 1 2 Cheung, Tony (10 October 2022). "Hong Kong's own national security law put on hold for more research". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 10 October 2022. Retrieved 10 October 2022.
  21. "National security committee supports law change: CE - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 13 January 2023.
  22. "Public consultation on Basic Law Article 23 legislation commences". The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 30 January 2024. Archived from the original on 1 March 2024. Retrieved 9 March 2024.
  23. "As it happened: Hong Kong Article 23 bill readings advance in Legco, with lawmakers set for marathon meetings over weekend to push forward legislation". South China Morning Post . 8 March 2024. Archived from the original on 9 March 2024. Retrieved 9 March 2024.