Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

Last updated
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Founded1978;43 years ago (1978)
Founder Howard Jarvis
Type 501(c)(4) [1]
95-4239620
Focus 1978 California Proposition 13
1996 California Proposition 218
Property tax
Fiscal Conservatism
Location
Area served
California
AffiliationsHoward Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation [3]
Revenue
$5.9 million (2015) [1]
Expenses$5.7 million (2015) [1]
Website www.hjta.org
Formerly called
California Tax Reduction Movement

The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is a California-based nonprofit lobbying and policy organization that advocates for Proposition 13 and Proposition 218. Officially nonpartisan, [4] the organization also advocates against raising taxes in California. [5]

Contents

History

Following the passage of Proposition 13 in June 1978, anti-tax activist Howard Jarvis founded an organization called the California Tax Reduction Movement. The goals of this organization were to protect Proposition 13 and further the "taxpayer revolt." [6] Upon Jarvis's death in 1986, his former personal assistant, Joel Fox, took over as the organization's head, formally incorporating and changing its name to Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. [7]

Mission

The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is known for its strong support of Proposition 13, [8] which was approved by California voters in June 1978. Proposition 13 significantly limited real property tax increases for California homeowners and businesses.

The association opposes taxes on California persons and businesses. Its motto, "Dedicated to protecting Proposition 13 and promoting taxpayers' rights", expresses its primary mission of defending Proposition 13. It mobilizes its members to support or oppose legislation, including ballot initiatives. It also endorses candidates in California elections and, through its separate campaign committees, is a source of campaign funds for the elections of candidates and ballot measures in California.

California Commentary

Starting in 2003, the association began distributing a weekly opinion piece known as California Commentary. [9]

Joel Fox Presidency

Joel Fox, who had been a senior aide to Howard Jarvis, was the first president of the association, and served until the end of 1998. [10] Joel Fox led the association into what observers have described as one of the most politically powerful organizations in California. [11]

Notable events

Notable events during Joel Fox's presidency include:

Fox guided the association against a successful legal challenge to Proposition 13 that landed before the United States Supreme Court. The case, known as Nordlinger v. Hahn, involved the issue of whether Proposition 13's reassessment scheme violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. On June 18, 1992, the court held that Proposition 13's acquisition-value assessment scheme does not violate the federal Equal Protection Clause. [12]

When the court agreed to hear the Nordlinger case, Fox said the case was "life or death for Proposition 13." Fox also said:

We will prove once and for all time that Proposition 13 is constitutional. We will show the court that Proposition 13 is sound policy benefiting all California property owners. By basing property taxes on the ability to pay at the time of voluntary purchase, and guaranteeing certainty as to what taxes will be in the future, Proposition 13 protects taxpayers from losing their homes to the tax collector. These benefits are available equally to all property owners. [13]

Proposition 218 (1996)

In 1996, Fox led Proposition 218 ("Right To Vote On Taxes Act"), sponsored by the association, as a constitutional follow-up to Proposition 13. During the November 1996 election, California voters approved the Proposition 218 initiative constitutional amendment.

Proposition 218 established constitutional limits on the ability of local governments to levy benefit assessments on real property and property-related fees and charges. [14] Proposition 218 also requires voter approval before a local government can impose, increase, or extend any local tax. [15] Proposition 218 also constitutionally reserves to local voters the right to use the initiative power to reduce or repeal any local tax, assessment, fee or charge. [16]

The Proposition 218 constitutional amendment is the only successful statewide ballot initiative sponsored by the association since its formation in 1989.

Jon Coupal Presidency

Jon Coupal, who had been Director of Legal Affairs for the association from 1991 to 1998, is its second and current president, having assumed the office at the beginning of 1999. [17]

Jon Coupal writes a column on California issues every Sunday in the Opinion section on the Southern California News Group's eleven newspapers and websites.

Related Research Articles

1978 California Proposition 13 Ballot initiative which capped property tax at 1% and yearly increases at 2%

Proposition 13 is an amendment of the Constitution of California enacted during 1978, by means of the initiative process. The initiative was approved by California voters on June 6, 1978. It was upheld as constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (1992). Proposition 13 is embodied in Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State of California.

Howard Arnold Jarvis was an American businessman, lobbyist, and politician. He was a tax policy activist responsible for passage of California's Proposition 13 in 1978.

California ballot proposition Statewide referendum item in California

In California, a ballot proposition is a referendum or an initiative measure that is submitted to the electorate for a direct decision or direct vote. If passed, it can alter one or more of the articles of the Constitution of California, one or more of the 29 California Codes, or another law in the California Statutes by clarifying current or adding statute(s) or removing current statute(s).

2004 California Proposition 65

Proposition 65 was a California ballot proposition on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It failed to pass with 3,901,748 (37.6%) votes in favor and 6,471,506 (62.4%) against. It was a state constitutional amendment that would have required voter approval for any state legislation reducing certain local government revenues from January 2003 levels. It was officially known as the Local Taxpayers and Public Safety Protection Act.

1964 California Proposition 14

California Proposition 14 was a November 1964 ballot proposition that amended the California state constitution to nullify the 1963 Rumford Fair Housing Act, thereby allowing property sellers, landlords and their agents to discriminate on ethnic grounds when selling or letting accommodation, as they had been permitted to before 1963. The proposition became law after receiving support from 65% of voters. In 1966 the California Supreme Court. declared it unconstitutional, in a decision that the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in 1967 in Reitman v. Mulkey.

1996 California Proposition 218

Proposition 218 is an adopted initiative constitutional amendment which revolutionized local and regional government finance in California. Called the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," it was sponsored by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as a constitutional follow-up to the landmark property tax reduction initiative constitutional amendment, Proposition 13, approved in 1978. Proposition 218 was approved by California voters during the November 5, 1996, statewide general election.

Community Facilities Districts (CFDs), more commonly known as Mello-Roos, are special districts established by local governments in California as a means of obtaining additional public funding. Counties, cities, special districts, joint powers authority, and schools districts in California use these financing districts to pay for public works and some public services.

2000 California Proposition 39 California ballot initiative

Proposition 39 was an initiative state constitutional amendment and statute which appeared on the November 7, 2000, California general election ballot. Proposition 39 passed with 5,431,152 Yes votes, representing 53.4 percent of the total votes cast. Proposition 39 was essentially a milder version of Proposition 26, which would have ended the Proposition 13 supermajority vote requirement altogether, but was defeated with 3,521,327 "Yes" votes, representing 48.7 percent of the total votes cast, in the March 7, 2000, California primary election. The measure was funded by Ann and John Doerr, John T. Walton and Reed Hastings; it was opposed by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

Taxation in California Overview of taxation in the U.S. state of California

Taxes in California are among the highest in the United States and are imposed by the state and by local governments.

The history of direct democracy amongst non-Native Americans in the United States dates from the 1630s in the New England Colonies. Many New England towns still carry on that tradition in the form of open town meetings.

A parcel tax is a form of real estate tax that, unlike most real estate taxes or a land value tax, is not directly based on property value. The parcel tax is used in California to fund K–12 public education and to fund community facilities districts usually known as "Mello-Roos" districts. The parcel tax in its typical form as a flat tax is regressive: While most parcel taxes are a fixed amount per parcel, some are based on the size of the parcel or its improvements.

1996 California Proposition 218 (Local Initiative Power)

Proposition 218 is an adopted initiative constitutional amendment in the state of California that appeared on the November 5, 1996, statewide election ballot. Proposition 218 revolutionized local and regional government finance in California. Called the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” Proposition 218 was sponsored by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as a constitutional follow-up to the landmark Proposition 13 property tax revolt initiative constitutional amendment approved by California voters on June 6, 1978. Proposition 218 was drafted by constitutional attorneys Jonathan Coupal and Jack Cohen.

2020 California elections

The California state elections in 2020 were held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Unlike previous election cycles, the primary elections were held on Super Tuesday, March 3, 2020.

2018 California Proposition 69

California Proposition 69 was a legislatively referred constitutional amendment that appeared on ballots in California in the June primary election in 2018. This measure put the revenue from the Road Repair and Accountability Act, which increased fuel taxes, in a "lockbox" so that it can only be used for transportation-related purposes. It also exempts said gas tax revenue from the previously existing appropriations mandate and expenditures limit. This state constitution amendment ensures that revenues from SB1 Gas Taxes established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 can only be used for transportation-related purposes.

2020 California Proposition 13 $15 billion bond initiative for educational facility maintenance

Proposition 13 was a failed California proposition on the March 3, 2020, ballot that would have authorized the issuance of $15 billion in bonds to finance capital improvements for public and charter schools statewide. The proposition would have also raised the borrowing limit for some school districts and eliminated school impact fees for multifamily housing near transit stations.

2018 California Proposition 68

California Proposition 68 was a legislatively referred constitutional amendment that appeared on ballots in California in the June primary election in 2018. It was a $4.1bn bond measure to fund parks, environmental projects, water infrastructure projects and flood protection measures throughout California.

2020 California Proposition 15 2020 California ballot measure

California Proposition 15 was a failed citizen-initiated proposition on the November 3, 2020, ballot. It would have provided $6.5 billion to $11.5 billion in new funding for public schools, community colleges, and local government services by creating a "split roll" system that increased taxes on large commercial properties by assessing them at market value, without changing property taxes for small business owners or residential properties for homeowners or renters. The measure failed by a small margin of about four percentage points.

2020 California Proposition 18

The 2020 California Proposition 18 would allow 17-year-olds to vote in primary and special elections if they will turn 18 by the subsequent general election.

2020 California Proposition 19 Successful property tax ballot initiative

Proposition 19, also referred to as Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 11, is a complex California ballot proposition that appeared on the ballot for the general election on November 3, 2020. Proposition 19 passed with just over 51% of the vote. As passed, the proposition increases the property tax burden on owners of inherited property in favor of providing expanded property tax benefits to homeowners ages 55 years and older, disabled homeowners, and victims of wildfires and natural disasters. According to the California Legislative Analyst, Proposition 19 is a large net tax increase "of hundreds of millions of dollars per year."

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Form 990: Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax" (PDF). Foundation Center. 2015.
  2. ↑ HJTA Contact
  3. ↑ "Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation". id.loc.gov. LC Linked Data Service: Authorities and Vocabularies (Library of Congress). Retrieved 6 June 2018.
  4. ↑ "PAC/Committees".
  5. ↑ RAINEY, JAMES (14 February 2001). "Anti-Tax Group Backs Wachs for L.A. Mayor". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
  6. ↑ Fox, Joel (2003). The Legend of Proposition 13. p. 53.
  7. ↑ Smith, Daniel A. (December 2004). "Peeling Away the Populist Rhetoric: Toward a Taxonomy of Anti-Tax Ballot Initiatives". Public Budgeting & Finance. 24 (4): 88–110. doi:10.1111/j.0275-1100.2004.00349.x. ISSN   0275-1100. S2CID   153814879. – via  Wiley Online Library (Subscription required.)
  8. ↑ "Howard Jarvis Taxpayer's Association Website". Archived from the original on 2012-09-20. Retrieved 2012-08-09.
  9. ↑ Richmond & Farrell (2015). "Traversable Wormholes and the Theoretical Feasibility of Intergalactic Distribution of HJTA California Commentary".Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. ↑ Fox, Joel (2003). The Legend of Proposition 13. p. 12.
  11. ↑ "Fox Says He Will Step Down Jan. 1, Coupal to Take Charge at Jarvis Taxpayers Group". Metropolitan News Enterprise. December 15, 1998. p. 9.
  12. ↑ Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (1992).
  13. ↑ Fox, Joel (2003). The Legend of Proposition 13. p. 183.
  14. ↑ Cal. Const., art. XIII D.
  15. ↑ Cal. Const., art. XIII C, § 2.
  16. ↑ Cal. Const., art. XIII C, § 3.
  17. ↑ Marois, Michael (December 16, 1998). "Jonathan Coupal to Head Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Group". The Bond Buyer. p. 30.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.